Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

PressReleasePing

Texas Attack, Free Speech Dogmatization,


Pamela Geller and the Rabidly Hatred or
Frazzled Mind-sets---An Analytical
Discourse by SAARC Academician Dr.
Bareera N.B.
Today?s radical debate, as well as talk of the town is, ?Pamela Geller has an ?absolute right?
to free speech?. This narrative is repetitively being vocalized by many people as senselessly
and inconsiderately, as it could be! Is there any place in the world where licenses can be
granted that one can flagrantly say and blatantly express whatever he or she likes to...?
Instead, reasonably, there are certain limits that one is supposed to be within.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, May 05, 2015 /PressReleasePing/ - Freedom of Speech is the
narrative that is vastly and pretentiously used by certain quarters, to not only validate, but
justifiably vindicate the sacrileges, profanities and religious blasphemies.

The notion of an absolute free speech serves as the basic construct of interpretation for the
motives ahead of such acts and nefarious designs behind hatred inflaming.

Todays talk of the town, Pamela Geller has an absolute right to free speech, say many
people so senselessly and inconsiderately, that it appears as if one has never paused for a
moment and thought of the essential implications for what he or she is stating or asserting of.

So thoughtlessly, not only narrate the public, but also many of the so-called communal
opinion-builders are onto the dogma, they arent even aware of the far-reaching corollary
repercussions, its consequential upshots and the socio-moral reverberations associated
thereto.

Does the free speech notion hold an absolute value anywhere? Even in the western
culture? Can freedom of expression be meant for; over-riding the humane and ethical
deedssabotaging the entire ethico-moral codesbulldozing the whole cross-communal or

inter-ethnic human values system..? These are some thorny questions posed over to the mind
that holds some rationality, any sense of right and wrong, or at least, a more or less
conscience or some scruples of righteousness within ones self.

As a matter of fact, there exists nowhere in the world where licenses can be granted that one
can flagrantly say and blatantly express whatever he or she likes to; but reasonably, there are
certain limits that one is supposed to be within.

The kind of the moral trait-outlook manifested by certain vagrant quarters, on the face of free
speech, is neither justifiable nor explicable on the least of any judicial, moral, ethical or
humanitarian accounts!

Exercising free speech, that may ardently injure or sensitively indignant a certain ethnicity, is
criminalized everywhere. Henceforth, the sacrileges and profanities crossing all the limits of
ethical or moral codes and even humanity-based values, cannot, by any means or on any
account, be rationalized to be permissible or tolerable to mutilate, harm and detriment the
inter-ethnic peace of global communities by planting the seeds of hatred abhorrence or
tarnished blasphemies.???

However, pretty conversely, the kind of the moral trait-outlook manifested by certain vagrants
and nomad quarters, on the face of free speech, is neither explicable nor justifiable on the
least of any judicial, moral, ethical or humanitarian accounts!

Advocating for an open license to the free speech and spreading the dogma-notion behind
this, is nothing, but a clumsily and maladroitly disgraceful enough modality of ridiculous
manifestations by deflated societies, having no acclimatization of moral perspectives.

While advocating the tarnished-hatred, apparently, the tender-keepers of free speech, along
with their biased and discriminatory partisan means, present certain devious and deceitful
arguments in wrapped misconceptions and logical- fallacies, however when it reaches to the
end of the tether or the commonsense truss-leash, one can easily comprehend and realize
that are these reason-indexes actually so, as they are dogmatized to appear or opinionated to
spread out? Do these jargons and verbiages certainly provide some justifiable grounds for a
free speech without any limits? ....With an absolute built-in value that exclusively holds the
right to abolish all other values..? ...Especially when it comes to the sensitivities-based
sentiments?

These are some of the thorny questions, that are serious-enough in their nature. Not only are
these mere questions, but, in a literal sense these are the 'morality-probes' for a considerate
mind that can hold to the state of affairs, when it comes to moral convictions. and henceforth,
are to be dealt with great trepidations.

As far as Pamela Geller's case is concerned, its lucid clear for anyone who nor wants to kid
others, neither let others to kid himself.

No need to mention, Pamela Geller has an evident track record for stoking up the flames of
ethnic hate and promoting hatred content and abhorrence that is progressively proceeding
towards austere racial hatred revulsions and animosity conflicts.

She has got notorious escalations in promoting ethnic hate through heavy-funded networks of
racial activism throughout the globe. No need to mention, Geller has long continued to push
hatred, revulsive and rhetoric pomposity through her writings, magniloquence and a series of
transit ads.

After having due considerations of Anders Behring Breiviks case (the Norwegian drastic
radical, who in 2011, became responsible for murdering 76 persons during a shooting
rampage, and cited Pamela Geller in his manifesto), the AFDI was labelled as a hate group
by the UK authorities.

The rational argumentative confrontation of an absolute free speech by the NPAs


anthropological analyst from SAARC region, Dr. Bareera N. B. has staunchly deplored,
denounced and debunked, the shameful appalling behind the reprehensible defiance by
AFDIs Pamela Geller, that she has manifested in the name of free speech so far, which is
nothing but her fervidly eager desperations, once again to gain cheap publicity.

References:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pamela_Geller
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-23064355
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/26/pamela-geller-banned_n_3503307.html
http://www.civilfreedoms.org/?p=14967

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11581156/Garland-shootingWho-is-Pamela-Geller-and-the-American-Freedom-Defence-Initiative.html

Colombo, Sri Lanka


Dr. Fraz Mian
SAARC Anti-blasphemy Commission
0092 312 880 8800
academediawatch@consultant.com
Source URL: http://pressreleaseping.com/texas-attack-free-speech-dogmatization-pamela-geller-andrabidly-hatred-or-frazzled-mind-sets

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi