Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
February 1999
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
9/97
Issued
2/99
Complete Revision
REVISION
February 1999
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ..................................3
5. Design........................................... 8
2. References....................................4
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3. Definitions.....................................6
4. General..........................................7
4.1 Applicable PIP Documents................7
4.2 ASME Code Requirements ...............7
4.2.2 Applicable Code Scope
Exemptions ................................. 7
4.2.3 Waste Heat Recovery Vessels ..... 7
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
Page 1 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.14
5.15
5.16
5.17
5.18
Nozzles .......................................... 28
Manways........................................ 30
Anchor Bolts................................... 31
Internals ......................................... 32
Vessel Supports ............................. 33
5.18.1
5.18.2
5.18.3
5.18.4
General...................................33
Vertical Vessels ......................33
Horizontal Vessels ..................35
Stacked Exchangers ...............37
Page 2 of 56
Tubes .....................................37
Tubesheets .............................37
Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints........38
Tube Bundles..........................39
Expansion Joints.....................40
Vapor Belts .............................41
Exchanger Covers...................41
Pass Partition Plates...............42
Floating Heads........................42
Kettle Type Exchangers...........42
6. Materials......................................52
6.1 Material Specifications....................52
6.1.1 External Attachments .................52
6.1.2 Internal Attachments ..................52
7. Testing ........................................54
7.1 Hydrostatic Test..............................54
7.1.1 UG-99 Standard Hydrostatic
Test ...........................................54
7.1.2 Horizontal Vessels......................54
7.1.3 Vertical Vessels..........................54
7.1.4 Test Temperature.......................55
Appendices
A - General Considerations for Pressure Relief
Valve Application
B[V] - Welded Pressure Joint Requirements Form
B[E] - Welded Pressure Joint Requirements Form
C - Equivalent Pressure Formulas for Bending
Moment and Axial Tensile Load
D - Minimum Clearance for Nozzle Adjacent
to Integral Tubesheet
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
1.
Introduction
Note to Readers: This Practice contains design criteria for pressure vessels and shell-and-tube
heat exchangers. Corresponding subject matter for pressure vessels and shell-and-tube heat
exchangers is covered by paragraphs identically numbered. Paragraphs pertaining to pressure
vessels are preceded by [V]. Paragraphs pertaining to shell-and-tube heat exchangers are
preceded by [E]. Paragraphs pertaining to both are preceded by [V/E]. In addition, ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII, Division 2 requirements are shown in braces
{ }.
This Practice should be used for pressure vessels built to Division 1 or Division 2 of the
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, henceforth referred to as the Code. Shell-and-tube
heat exchangers are limited to Division 1 in this Practice.
1.1
Purpose
[V] The primary focus of this Practice is to communicate vessel design criteria and
methodology from the User to a Designer. This Practice is also intended as guidance
for the development of purchase specifications covering the construction of new
pressure vessels which meet the philosophy and requirements of Section VIII, Division
1 {or 2} of the Code.
[E] The primary focus of this Practice is to communicate vessel design criteria and
methodology from the User to a Designer. This Practice is also intended as guidance
for the development of purchase specifications covering the construction of new shelland-tube heat exchangers which meet the philosophy and requirements of Section VIII,
Division 1 of the Code and TEMA Standards of the Tubular Exchangers
Manufacturers Association.
1.2
Scope
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
Page 3 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
2.
February 1999
References
The following documents are only those specifically referenced in this Practice. In applications
where laws or regulations issued by municipal, state, provincial, or federal authorities cover
pressure vessels, those laws or regulations should be reviewed prior to the initiation of design
work since the requirements may be different or more restrictive than those covered in this
Practice. Short titles will be used herein when appropriate.
2.1
2.2
Page 4 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
ASME B1.1 - Unified Inch Screw Threads (UN and UNR Thread Form)
ASME B16.5 - Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, NPS 1/2 through NPS 24
2.3
WRC Bulletin 107 - Local Stresses in Spherical and Cylindrical Shells Due
to External Loadings
Other References
Process Equipment Design. Brownell and Young. Wiley & Sons Publishers,
1959.
Wind Loads on Petrochemical Facilities, ASCE Task Committee on WindInduced Forces, Wind Loads and Anchor Bolt Design for Petrochemical
Facilities. (ISBN-0-7844-0262-0)
Page 5 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
2.4
Government Regulations
3.
February 1999
Definitions
Code: ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII, Division 1{or 2}. References to
Division 2 are identified in braces { }.
Construction: An all-inclusive term comprising materials, design, fabrication, examination,
inspection, testing, certification (Code stamp and Manufacturers Data Report),
{Manufacturers Design Report} and pressure relief
Designer: The party responsible for defining and specifying the mechanical design
requirements (e.g., Vessel Drawing/Data Sheet {Users Design Specification}) consistent with
User criteria for use by the Manufacturer. The Designer is frequently an engineering
contractor, but could be the User, third party consultant, or the Manufacturer. The Designer is
also considered the thermal Designer with respect to heat exchanger design.
Manufacturer: The party entering into a contract with the Purchaser to construct a vessel in
accordance with the purchase order
National Board: The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, an
organization comprised of chief inspectors of various governmental jurisdictions in the United
States and Canada. Vessels meeting requirements of the Code, except those stamped with the
Code UM symbol, may be registered with the National Board.
Overlay Specification: Technical requirements that supplement or override the provisions of
this document, such as a User specification or a project specification
User: The party responsible for establishing construction criteria consistent with the Code
philosophy and service hazards. User refers to the owner and/or operator of the equipment.
Vessel: This term may be used as a non-specific reference to a pressure vessel or a shell-andtube heat exchanger
Page 6 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
4.
General
4.1
4.2
[V/E] Pressure vessels within the scope of this Practice shall satisfy all
applicable requirements, including Code symbol stamping.
4.2.2
4.2.2.2
The above is not intended to prohibit the use of other Scope exemptions in
Code Paragraph U-1(c)(2); however, such use shall be by agreement with the
User.
4.2.3
4.3
4.4
Jurisdictional Compliance
[V/E] All aspects of the work shall comply with applicable local, county, state, and
federal rules and regulations. This includes, but is not limited to, the rules and
standards established by EPA and OSHA. (See Section 2.4.)
Page 7 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
4.5
REVISION
February 1999
Units of Measurement
[V/E] US customary (English) units shall be regarded as standard; metric (SI units)
may be included for reference only and shall not be interpreted as a precise conversion.
4.6
Language
[V/E] The language of all documents shall either be English or include the English
translation.
4.7
5.
4.7.1
4.7.2
4.7.3
4.7.4
4.7.5
4.7.6
Design
5.1
Page 8 of 56
Initial startup
Normal operations
Temporary operations
Emergency shutdown
Emergency operations
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Normal shutdown
Upset conditions
[V/E] The margin above the maximum anticipated operating pressure selected to
establish the design pressure and coincident maximum metal temperature must be
carefully considered for each vessel component as a function of the overall objective
with respect to pressure relief, coupled with the uncertainties in determining what
actual pressures will be developed. For example, where minimization of severely
flammable or acutely toxic environmental hazards is a controlling design requirement,
the establishment of a design pressure and associated Maximum Allowable Working
Pressure (MAWP) {MAWP replaced by Design Pressure in Division 2, AD-121.1}
that will provide containment without actuation of the pressure relief device may be a
consideration.
[V/E] As will be noted with reference to Appendix A, this margin is also dependent
upon the operational characteristics of the pressure relief device. For example, when
the maximum anticipated operating pressure of a gas/vapor service can be identified
with confidence and metal-seated, direct spring-operated valves will be used, the
design pressure is frequently established by dividing the maximum anticipated
operating pressure by 0.90. However, when a pilot-operated pressure relief device is
used, the design pressure is sometimes established by dividing the maximum
anticipated operating pressure by a factor as high as 0.98.
[V/E] Refer to the Overlay Specification for any margins to be applied to the
maximum operating pressure(s) and coincident temperature(s).
[V/E] Also use of Code Case 2211, entitled Pressure Vessels with Overpressure
Protection by System Design, Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2, may be an appropriate
option. Note that prior jurisdictional acceptance may be required and that this Code
Case Number shall be shown on the Manufacturers Data Report. Likewise, with
permission from the authority having legal jurisdiction over the installation of pressure
vessels (should one exist), the advantages of using the provisions of Code Case 2203
entitled Omission of Lifting Device Requirements for Pressure Relief Valves on Air,
Water over 140 F, or Steam Service, Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2, should be
considered.
[E] The shell side and tube side design pressures and temperatures shall be reviewed to
determine extreme conditions that may be encountered. During transients (startup,
pressure relief, or shutdown, etc.), the shell side or tube side fluid may be absent, not
flowing, or auto-refrigerating with design pressure in the other chamber. For
components subjected to both shell side and tube side conditions, the more severe
condition shall control. The following additional conditions shall be considered:
Page 9 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
5.2
REVISION
February 1999
5.1.1
[E] The exchanger shall be designed for full pressure on either side with
atmospheric (or full vacuum if specified) on the other side. If an exchanger is
designed for differential pressure, the Data Sheet and nameplate shall so
indicate.
5.1.2
5.2.2
Page 10 of 56
[V/E] To provide for future field tests, the vessel and foundation (provided by
others) shall be designed so that any component in the corroded condition will
withstand the combination of hydrostatic test pressure at the top of the vessel
(as defined in Paragraph UG-99 {Article T-3} of the Code) and the
hydrostatic head of the vessel full of water when the vessel is in its operating
position without exceeding the stress levels defined in Section 5.10.9(4).
Vessel designs that include such features as conical sections without knuckles,
torispherical heads with an inside crown radius/head thickness (L/t) ratio
greater than 500, openings in the shell that exceed the dimensional limits given
in Code Paragraph UG-36(b)(1) {Not Division 2 Applicable}, thermal
gradients, or body flanges may require special analysis for future tests. Refer
to Section 5.10 for additional requirements that apply. Note that the
equipment foundation must also be designed to support the loading of a future
test.
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.3
5.4
5.5
Cyclic Service
[V/E] The required service for all vessels shall include consideration by the Designer
of cyclic service. Paragraph UG-22(e) {AD-160} of the Code mandates that cyclic
and dynamic reactions from any mechanical or thermal loading source be considered in
design. Batch operation vessels and vessels having agitators, for example, quite
Page 11 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
frequently fall into this category. The following guidelines {AD-160} are
recommended as a starting point when determining if cyclic analysis will be required.
The need for a fatigue analysis by the Manufacturer shall be stated on the Data Sheet
by the Designer.
5.5.1
5.5.2
Fatigue Analysis
[V/E] In cases where the preliminary guidelines in Section 5.5.1 indicate that
a fatigue analysis may be required, the rules in Code Section VIII, Division 2,
Paragraph AD-160, Fatigue Evaluation, are recommended for use with
sound engineering judgment as a guideline for establishing further action. A
fatigue analysis shall always be performed for agitator mounting nozzles and
their attachment to the vessel. (See Sections 5.12.2 and 5.14.1.)
5.5.3
5.6
Page 12 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.6.2.2
5.6.2.3
5.6.2.4
5.6.2.5
5.6.2.6
Page 13 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
5.6.2.7
February 1999
5.6.2.6.2
5.6.2.6.3
Where:
Total cross-sectional metal area of tubes, sq. in.
Modulus of Elasticity of tube material at mean metal
temperature, psi
As = Cross-sectional metal area of shell based on actual
thickness less corrosion allowance, sq. in.
Es = Modulus of Elasticity of shell material at mean metal
temperature, psi
At =
Et =
5.7
Page 14 of 56
[V/E] Vessels shall be postweld heat treated per applicable sections of the
Code in accordance with material specifications or when specified by the User
due to service such as ammonia, caustics, amines, or wet hydrogen sulfide.
Requirements for PWHT of carbon and low-alloy steels are provided in Table
UCS-56 {AF-402.1} of the Code. Alternative PWHT requirements of Code
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.8
Wind Load
5.8.1
Page 15 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Page 16 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.8.2
Vessel Description
Cf
0.5
5.9
Seismic Loads
Note: Local codes and regulations may require compliance with UBC or other
rules for seismic design.
5.9.1
Page 17 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.9.3
Page 18 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
ac = 1.0, except for flexible equipment such as tall slender vessels, vessels on
tall legs, springs or other resilient supports. This factor is then given as
follows: for Tc/T < 0.6 or Tc/T > 1.4, ac = 1.0; for Tc/T 0.6 or Tc/T 1.4,
ac = 5.0. Tc is the first natural period of the equipment and T is the first
natural period of the structure.
Wc is the operating weight of the equipment.
Fp is the horizontal seismic force applied at the center of gravity of the
equipment and in the direction causing the highest stresses.
(See Section 5.10.7.)
5.10
Page 19 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
L1+L6
2.
L1+L2+L3+L4+L6+L8
3.
L1+L2+L3+L4+L7+L8
4.
L1+(F)L3+L5+(0.25)L6
Page 20 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.11
Page 21 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Formed Heads
5.12.1 [V/E] Design rules to prevent buckling of thin fabricated torispherical heads
subjected to internal pressure are not yet available in Division 1 or Division 2
of the Code. Accordingly, for L/t ratios greater than 500, design checks of the
Code-required thickness should be made based on equations for perfect
torispheres that have been modified to reflect experimental results on
fabricated models (see Section 2.3, Galletly). This check may reveal the need
for a head thickness greater than the Code-required minimum thickness.
Note: L is the inside spherical or crown radius and t is the minimum
required thickness of the head after forming (corroded condition).
5.12.2 [V/E] When an agitator is mounted on a nozzle (or studding outlet), in a
formed head, the head thickness determined from Code formulas for pressure
loadings and static local loadings analysis is often not sufficient to provide the
rigidity and stress levels acceptable for the dynamic loadings that will be
applied. Prior to ordering the head, the agitator manufacturer shall be
consulted regarding the recommended minimum head thickness for the agitator
installation under consideration.
5.13
Page 22 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
custom-designed per the Code. For nozzles larger than NPS 24 and for body flanges of
any size, the options available (as follows in Sections 5.13.1 through 5.13.4) to the
User must be carefully selected as a function of the need.
5.13.1 ASME B16.47, Series A (NPS 26 through NPS 60)
[V/E] These are standard carbon, low-alloy and austenitic stainless steel
flanges of the integral hub, welding neck style that are dimensionally the same
as MSS SP-44 flanges. The materials covered are identical with those in
Materials Groups 1 and 2 of ASME B16.5. Line valves and machinery nozzles
may be provided with flanges of MSS SP-44 dimensions. Therefore, vessel
nozzle flanges that meet the dimensions of Series A flanges may either be
necessary or desirable. Series A and Series B flanges are not dimensionally
compatible in all sizes.
5.13.2 ASME B16.47, Series B (NPS 26 through NPS 60)
[V/E] These are standard carbon, low-alloy and austenitic stainless steel
flanges of the integral hub, welding neck flange style that are dimensionally
the same as flanges covered under the now obsolete API 605. The materials
covered are identical with those in Materials Groups 1 and 2 of ASME B16.5.
Machinery nozzles may be provided with flanges of Series B dimensions.
Therefore, vessel nozzle flanges that meet the dimensions of Series B flanges
may either be necessary or desirable. Series A and Series B flanges are not
dimensionally compatible in all sizes.
5.13.3 Custom-Designed Flanges per Code
5.13.3.1 [V/E] Custom-designed flanges may be required when:
a. Materials of construction covered in ASME B16.5 or ASME
B16.47 are not appropriate for the service conditions.
b. For NPS 26 through NPS 60, the desired flange style is other
than the welding neck type (e.g., lap joint, slip-on) covered in
ASME B16.47.
c. Design conditions for the intended service application exceed
the pressure-temperature ratings of ASME B16.5 or ASME
B16.47 flanges.
d. Service requirements result in significant mechanical loadings
other than pressure. The pressure-temperature ratings of both
ASME B16.5 and ASME B16.47 are based primarily on
pressure loadings and accordingly, the flanges may not be
suitably designed for externally-applied moment or axial
thrust loadings (e.g., as imposed by mating piping, weight,
wind, or seismic loadings), resulting in leak-tightness
problems. See Appendix C for the method usually employed
for considering such mechanical loadings.
Page 23 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
36
36 < OD 60
1-1/4
OD > 60
1-1/2
Notes:
1. Gasket Contact Width is the recommended minimum
width of the gasket in contact with both flange faces.
2. For 3-ply corrugated metal gaskets, the gasket OD
shall be a minimum of 1/4 inch less than the raised
face or lap ring OD. (See Section 5.13.4.4.)
5.13.3.3 [V/E] Design flanges not only for the design pressure, but also for
other loadings that will be applied to the joints during the project
life (e.g., externally-applied bending moment and axial thrust
loadings.) [See Section 5.13.3.1(d).]
5.13.3.4 [V/E] Select flange thickness so that, considering all loadings that
will be applied [see Section 5.13.3.1(d)], the Rigidity Index as
defined in Appendix S-2 {Appendix M} of the Code is 1.0, based
on the recommended value of KL of 0.2 or K1 of 0.3, as applicable.
5.13.3.5 [V/E] Flange bolts shall not be less than 3/4 inch nominal diameter.
Flange bolt holes shall be 1/8 inch larger than the diameter of the
bolts.
5.13.3.6 [V/E] Nubbins are permitted only by agreement with the User.
5.13.4 Custom-Designed Lap Joint Flanges
[V/E] Practices relative to lap joint flanges that experience has shown will
result in a level of damage tolerance, leak-tightness integrity, and gasket
replacement capability equivalent to the welding neck style are as follows:
Page 24 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
OD 18
18 < OD 36
1-1/2
36 < OD 60
1-3/4
OD > 60
[V/E] The difference between the flange Inside Diameter (ID) and the
shell OD shall not exceed:
1/16 inch for nominal diameters up to and including NPS 12
1/8 inch for nominal diameters over NPS 12 through 48 inches
OD
3/16 inch for nominal diameters over 48 inches OD
5.13.4.6 Flange Bevel and Lap Ring Weld
[V/E] The fillet weld attaching the lap ring to the shell shall be an
equal leg fillet weld with the leg dimension equal to the nominal shell
thickness (+1/16 inch, -0). The difference between the diameter of the
Page 25 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
flange bevel where the lap ring contacts the surface of the flange and
the nominal diameter at the toe of the lap ring attachment weld at the
back of the lap ring shall be 1/8 inch (+1/16 inch, -0).
5.13.5 Lap Joint Flanges NPS 24 and Smaller
[V/E] When ASME B16.5 lapped flanges are specified, the User is cautioned
to make the checks/inspections necessary to ensure that the flanges actually
are ASME B16.5 lapped flanges.
[V/E] For certain of the smaller sizes in each pressure class, the lengththrough-hub (dimension Y) of the slip-on flange and the lapped flange are the
same. (This is true through NPS 12 for Class 150, through NPS 8 for Class
300, etc.) Accordingly, since the slip-on flange is more commonly used, flange
manufacturers typically modify the small slip-on flanges to make the lapped
style. This modification consists of machining the corner radius of the bore as
specified in ASME B16.5 (dimension r) and removing the raised face. The
latter change is permitted in Interpretation 3-5 of
ASME B16.5, provided the resulting flange meets the requirements for a
lapped flange, including flange thickness, or a length-through-hub dimension.
[V/E] The caution is focused on larger sizes where the length-through-hub
(dimension Y) for lapped flanges is greater than that of the slip-on style. Some
flange manufacturers have furnished the modified versions of these slip-on
flanges as lapped flanges, calling them short-hubbed lapped flanges. These
flanges do not comply with ASME B16.5 and, as a result, do not comply with
either the Code or OSHA when Code construction is mandated. The strength
of the short-hubbed flanges cannot generally be justified by Code calculations.
5.13.6 Slip-on Flanges
[V/E] Slip-on flanges are limited to use under the following conditions:
Page 26 of 56
1.
2.
3.
[V/E] Corrosion allowance does not exceed 1/16 inch (1.6 mm)
4.
5.
[V/E] MDMT is not colder than minus 20 F for carbon and lowalloy steels
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
6.
7.
8.
[V/E] For vessels not in hot hydrogen service (Hot hydrogen service
is defined as hydrogen partial pressure exceeding 100 psia, with a
corresponding coincident temperature exceeding 400 F.)
Page 27 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Nozzles
5.14.1 [V/E] Nozzles supporting agitators, pumps, or other mechanical equipment
shall be suitably reinforced to withstand the mechanical loadings specified by
the device manufacturer. Likewise, nozzles for pressure relief devices shall be
designed and reinforced for thrust reaction. Use of heavier nozzle necks,
conventional reinforcing pads with properly contoured fillet welds, and formed
heads of appropriate stiffness are the elements that result in a design suitable
for an infinite number of cycles. Gussets shall not be used to strengthen,
stiffen, or reinforce nozzles, unless demonstrated by calculations to be suitable
for the specified cyclic life or thermal condition.
For such nozzles, consideration shall be given to the dimensional requirements
of the device as supplied by the device manufacturer (e.g., tolerances).
5.14.2 [V/E] Surface-attached nozzles as shown in Code Figures UW-16.1(a), (a-1),
(a-2), (a-3) and (b) {Figures 610.1(a) and (b)}, and those with internal
reinforcing pads, are not permitted.
Page 28 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.14.3 [V/E] Nozzle locations (including manways) and their reinforcing pads, if
necessary, shall preferably not interfere with or cover pressure vessel weld
seams [see PIP VESV1002, Section 5.2.2(c)]. When located in heads other
than hemispherical heads, all of the nozzle reinforcing shall preferably be
within the spherical portion of the head.
5.14.4 [V/E] Vessels shall be provided with sufficient connections to permit purging,
pumpout, venting, decontamination, pressure relieving and draining. Vortex
breakers shall be provided on pump suction nozzles. (See PIP VEFV1124.)
5.14.5 [V/E] For vessels supported by a skirt, the flange of any nozzle in the bottom
head shall be located outside the skirt.
5.14.6 [V/E] In establishing nozzle and manway projections, clearance should be
provided for removing flange stud bolts from between the flange and vessel
and for accessing flange stud nuts. Clearance for flange studs and nuts should
be considered when nozzles penetrate insulation or platforms.
Minimum projection from the outside of the vessel wall to the nozzle face shall
be:
Round up the dimension from the face of the nozzle to the vessel centerline or
reference line to the next larger 1/2-inch increment.
5.14.7 [V/E] Minimum nozzle neck nominal thickness for carbon steel nozzles shall
be per Code Paragraph UG-45, except in no case shall the nominal thickness
selected for NPS 3 and smaller be thinner than Sch 80.
5.14.8 [V/E] Minimum nozzle neck nominal thickness for high-alloy and non-ferrous
alloy nozzles shall be per Code Paragraph UG-45, except in no case shall the
nominal thickness selected for NPS 3 and smaller be thinner than Sch 40S.
5.14.9 [V/E] {Not Division 2 Applicable} When there is concern that an overstress
condition may exist, the local membrane and surface stresses due to local
loads (e.g., piping loads, platform loads, etc.) shall be determined using the
WRC Bulletin 107 procedure, or other local stress analysis procedures. For
local loads and pressure, the allowable stresses are 1.5S for local primary
membrane stress and 3S for primary membrane plus secondary bending stress
at nozzles, platform lugs, etc. S shall be the Code-allowable stress at the
design temperature.
5.14.10 [E] Nozzles shall not be located closer to an integrally attached tubesheet,
either shell side or tube side, than shown in Appendix D.
5.14.11 [V/E] Openings exceeding the size limits stated in Code Paragraph
UG-36(b)(1) shall meet the supplemental rules of Code Appendix 1-7(a) and
(b). (Code Case 2236 covering alternative design rules for large openings
shall only be used with Users agreement.)
Page 29 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
5.14.12 [V/E] A minimum of three safety retainer clips shall be welded to the nozzle
neck at the back of NPS 4 and larger lap joint flanges that face upward.
(Facing upward is defined as inclination of the nozzle from the horizontal at
an angle of 30 degrees or greater.) These clips shall be located so that a
spacing of one Length-through-hub dimension (dimension Y in ASME B16.5)
will exist between the back of the lap and the face of the flange. This will
allow for future painting of the nozzle neck in this region.
5.15
Manways
[V/E] The location, quantity, and size of manways and internal ladder rungs shall be
specified to ensure that all interior areas are accessible as required. Minimum
requirements regarding manway and inspection openings are covered in Code
Paragraph UG-46 {Article D-10}, Inspection Openings.
5.15.1 [V/E] Service conditions, size, and configuration of the vessel may justify
manways other than (or in addition to) those mandated by the Code.
5.15.1.1 [V] Vessels with mixers/agitators shall be provided with at least one
manway that does not require removal of the mixer/agitator.
5.15.1.2 [V] Unless other provisions (e.g., body flanges) are made for tray
removal, trayed towers shall have at least two manways: one at the
top and one at the bottom. Additional manways shall be as specified
by the User.
5.15.2 [V/E] Manways shall be usable from a ladder, platform, or grade.
5.15.3 [V] Vessels smaller than 3 feet ID that are subject to internal corrosion,
erosion or mechanical abrasion shall be equipped with inspection openings as
described in Code Paragraph UG-46 {Article D-10}. Vessels in this size
category may justify the use of body flanges.
5.15.4 [V] Vessels 3 feet ID and larger that are subject to internal corrosion, erosion,
or mechanical abrasion shall be equipped with one or more flanged and
blinded manways.
5.15.5 [V/E] The nominal recommended manway size is NPS 24 with a finished ID
not less than 23 inches. Manways shall not be smaller than NPS 18 or have a
finished ID of less than 17 inches. Larger diameter manways should be used to
satisfy additional needs such as, but not limited to, installation of
internals/catalyst, packing, maintenance requirements, long projection due to
thick insulation, etc.
5.15.6 [V/E] To provide utility for entry and exit, vessel geometry and location of
access platforms shall be considered when locating manways. Internal ladders
or grab rungs may be needed at manway locations for entry and exit.
5.15.7 [V/E] Provisions shall be made for lifting devices (fixed or portable) at
manways for personnel rescue as described in OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146.
Page 30 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.15.8 [V/E] Manways shall be equipped with either a davit or hinge to facilitate
handling of the blind flange. Manways oriented with the nozzle neck axis in a
horizontal plane shall be equipped with a hinge in accordance with
PIP VEFV1116 or a davit in accordance with PIP VEFV1117. Attach the
davit-socket bracket to the nozzle neck when lap joint flanges are employed.
Manways on the top of vessels oriented with a vertical nozzle neck axis shall
be equipped with a davit in accordance with PIP VEFV1118.
5.15.9 [V/E] Consideration may be given for use of suitable process connections as
manways and handholes. (Consider both size and location.)
5.15.10 [V/E] When approved by the User, flanges and their pressure-retaining covers
for manways may be custom-designed, with due consideration being given to
providing a Rigidity Index in accordance with the recommendations in Code
Appendix S-2 {Appendix M}. A detail sketch describing the flange, cover,
bolting, and gasket, as well as Code calculations supporting the design, shall
be provided.
5.16
Anchor Bolts
5.16.1 [V/E] Materials for anchor bolts shall be selected from one of the following:
1. Carbon steel: A-36 or A-307 Grade B
2. Low-alloy steel: A-193 B7. The Users written approval shall be
obtained for the use of this low-alloy material.
5.16.2 [V/E] The allowable design stress, as calculated using the tensile stress area
of the threaded portion, shall not exceed the following (see Note):
[V/E] Anchor bolts selected shall not be smaller than 3/4 inch, shall be
selected in multiples of 4, and shall straddle normal centerlines.
5.16.3 [V/E] Anchor bolts shall be selected with the following threads and the tensile
stress area shall be selected accordingly:
Page 31 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
5.16.4 [V/E] For vessels on concrete foundations, the allowable concrete bearing
stress used in design shall be 1800 psi.
Note: This value is based on the use of concrete with an ultimate strength,
f'c, of 3000 psi for which the minimum allowable bearing is (0.7)(0.85)f'c
(approximately 1800 psi for 3000 psi concrete).
Higher values may be used consistent with the ulitmate strength chosen (if
known) and other provisions of state-of-the-art concrete foundation design.
The design loadings for anchor bolts embedded in concrete may be determined
by either the simplified method (neutral axis of bolt pattern at centerline of
vessel) or the shifted neutral axis method (See Section 2.3, Brownell &
Young). However, the use of the latter method is recommended for large
vertical vessels because of the economic benefit.
Note: The neutral axis shift method does not apply for vessels supported
by steel structures.
5.16.5 [V/E] Anchor bolts embedded in concrete foundations shall be zinc-coated
(hot dip galvanized or mechanically zinc-coated) so that the addition of a
corrosion allowance is not required.
5.17
Internals
[V/E] Functional design of trays and other removable internals are outside the scope
of this Practice.
5.17.1 [V/E] Removable internals shall be sized to pass through designated vessel
openings. On vessels with internals where a vessel manway is not located in
the top head, internal rigging clips shall be provided to facilitate handling of
the internals.
5.17.2 [V/E] Vessel internals such as distributors, dip tubes, baffles, and
thermowells should not be located near manways in a manner that would
interfere with personnel access or rescue. Special consideration should be
given to the area directly below manways and to head knockers above
manways. In some circumstances, the addition of grab rungs may be
necessary.
5.17.3 [V/E] In services the User has defined as corrosive, welding of vessel internals
attached to a pressure boundary component shall be continuous on all surfaces
in order to eliminate corrosion pockets. All seams and corner joints shall be
sealed.
5.17.4 [V/E] Internal piping and baffles shall be mounted in a manner that will not
unduly restrict thermal expansion. Consideration shall be given to vibration
and the possibilities of fatigue failure. Where vibration and fatigue are
governing design requirements, internal non-pressure parts (e.g., baffles that
may be subject to vibration or cyclic loading) shall be continuously welded.
Page 32 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.17.5 [V/E] Internal bolting in vessels, especially where vibration is expected (e.g.,
where agitators are installed), shall either be double nutted, tack-welded to the
clip (or baffle) or have a lock wire placed in the nut/bolt or other supports.
5.17.6 [V/E] The nominal chemical composition of internal non-pressure piping shall
be compatible with that of the inside surface of the vessel and the process.
Flanges for internal non-pressure piping may be fabricated from plate but
must conform to ASME B16.5 Class 150 bolting dimensions.
5.17.7 [V/E] Vessel internals and all portions of each vessel shall be self-draining to
ensure complete elimination of liquid from the vessel when drained.
5.17.8 [V/E] For integrally clad and/or weld overlayed vessels, lightly loaded (as
defined in Code Section VIII, Division 2, Paragraph AD-912, footnote 4)
supports, such as those for trays, baffles, etc., may be welded directly to the
alloy clad or weld overlay. Where supports are carrying an appreciable load
(> 25% of the allowable stress for fillet welds), such as packing bed support
rings, the Designer shall determine and specify if the support is to be welded
directly to the base metal.
5.18
Vessel Supports
5.18.1 General
5.18.1.1 [V/E] Code-allowable stresses {design stress intensity} shall be
used for vessels and their supports. For combinations of earthquake
or wind loadings with other loadings listed in Code Paragraph UG22 {AD-110}, the allowable stresses {design stress intensity} may
be increased as permitted by Code Paragraph UG-23(c) {AD151.1}. See Section 5.10.9 for load combinations to be considered.
See also Code Appendix G {AD-940}.
5.18.1.2 [V/E] For structural-shape support members in compression where
slenderness ratio is a controlling design consideration, no increase in
the allowable compressive stress is permitted.
5.18.1.3 [V/E] For supports outside the scope of the Code, either Codeallowable stresses {design stress intensity} or, for structural shapes,
those in the AISC Manual of Steel Construction may be used.
5.18.1.4 [V/E] The MDMT for the vessel support assembly shall not be
warmer than the lowest one-day mean atmospheric temperature at
the installation site. (See Section 5.3.)
5.18.1.5 [V/E] Localized shell stresses at all support-to-shell locations shall
be considered, as applicable, for wind load, earthquake and all other
loadings described in Paragraph UG-22 {AD-110} of the Code.
(See Sections 5.8, 5.9 and 5.18.2.5.)
5.18.1.6 [V/E] Where reinforcing pads are used under supports,
consideration shall be given to stresses due to possible temperature
differentials among the vessel, pads, and supports.
Page 33 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Page 34 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Page 35 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.18.3.2 [V/E] Saddle wear plates, when required, shall have the following
proportions:
Page 36 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Page 37 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Page 38 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.19.4.4 [E] Each support plate and baffle in horizontal exchangers shall be
provided with a 1/2 inch x 90 degree notch in the bottom for
draining.
5.19.4.5 [E] All TEMA Type S and T (with removable shell cover)
exchangers shall have a floating head support plate located 4 to 6
inches from the inside face of the floating tubesheet.
5.19.4.6 [E] Except for shell side isothermal boiling, isothermal condensing,
or kettles, bypass sealing devices shall be provided as follows:
Seal strips are required when the radial clearance between
shell and the outer tubes exceeds 5/8 inch.
Exchangers with vertical cut baffles (baffle cut parallel to
shell side nozzle centerline) shall have seal strips installed to
seal the by-pass areas caused by the omission of tubes.
Dummy tubes, rods, or seal strips shall be provided for any
pass partition lanes which are parallel to the shell side flow.
Page 39 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Seal strip thickness shall not be less than the greater of 75%
of baffle thickness or 1/4 inch.
For vertical cut baffles (baffle cut parallel to shell side nozzle
centerline), seal strips shall not extend into the inlet or outlet
baffle spaces. For horizontal cut baffles (baffle cut
perpendicular to shell side nozzle centerline), seal strips shall
extend from the front or stationary tubesheet to the last baffle
or support plate.
One pair of seal strips or one dummy tube shall be provided
for each 5 tube rows between baffle cuts. Minor adjustments
may be made to suit actual tube layout.
5.19.4.7 [E] Exchangers with removable tube bundles weighing 20,000
pounds or more shall have bundle skid bars.
5.19.4.7.1 A minimum of two skid bars shall be provided. The
bars shall be 1/2 inch minimum thickness by 1-1/2 inch
minimum height flat bar. The skid bars shall be located
no more than 30 degrees from the vertical centerline.
5.19.4.7.2 The skid bars shall extend from the stationary tubesheet
to floating head support plate (TEMA Types S and T)
or end baffle (TEMA Types P, U and W).
5.19.4.7.3 When skid bars interfere with nozzle openings, the skid
bars shall be terminated at the baffle or support plate
adjacent to the nozzle. A tie rod/spacer of adequate
strength to carry the bundle pulling load shall be
located close to the tube field and within 3 inches of the
skid bar and shall extend from the tubesheet or
baffle/support plate on one side of the nozzle to the
baffle/support plate on the other side of the nozzle.
5.19.4.8 [E] Perforated or slotted impingement plates shall not be used.
5.19.4.9 [E] Multiple exchangers of the same TEMA size and material, either
stacked or parallel, shall have interchangeable components to the
maximum extent possible.
5.19.5 Expansion Joints
5.19.5.1 [E] Shell expansion joints shall be of the thick wall flanged and
flued type or flanged only type. Thin wall bellows type shall only
be used by User agreement, shall conform to Code Appendix 26,
and shall have the welding stubs of the same material as the shell.
5.19.5.2 [E] The design of expansion joints shall be performed by any
method of stress analysis (e.g., finite element analysis), including
TEMA Paragraph RCB-8, which can be shown to be applicable to
Page 40 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
expansion joints. The allowable stresses and cycle life for design
shall conform to Code Appendix CC. The need for and design of
expansion joints shall satisfy the following condition:
Differential thermal expansion encountered in the most
adverse combination of temperature combinations
anticipated and specified by the User -- for all normal
operating (including shutdown and startup) and upset
conditions or operation based on metal temperatures rather
than fluid temperatures and MAWP rather than operating
pressures
5.19.5.3 [E] Shell expansion joints shall be ventable and drainable in the
operating position.
5.19.5.4 [E] Expansion joints for single pass floating head units may be of
the thin wall bellows type. The expansion joint manufacturer
shall provide the bellows with welding stubs of the same material as
the tail pipe material. The design of the expansion joint shall
conform to Code Appendix 26.
5.19.5.5 [E] The expansion joint-to-shell weld shall not be located less than
2 ( Rt ) from the back of the tubesheet, where R is the outside
radius of the shell, in inches, and t is the actual thickness of the
shell less corrosion allowance, in inches.
5.19.6 Vapor Belts
5.19.6.1 [E] The design of vapor belts shall include:
5.19.6.2 [E] Vapor belts may be used as expansion joints provided all
requirements of Section 5.19.5 are met. Whether or not vapor belts
are used as expansion joints, vapor belt flexibility shall be
considered in the design of exchanger shell, tubes, and tubesheets.
5.19.7 Exchanger Covers
5.19.7.1 [E] TEMA Type T exchangers (except kettle type reboilers) shall
have removable shell covers.
5.19.7.2 [E] When full diameter tubesheets are specified on exchangers with
removable tube bundles, the following shall apply:
Page 41 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.19.9
Floating Heads
5.19.9.1 [E] Floating heads shall be designed and dimensioned in
accordance with Code Figure 1-6(d).
5.19.9.2 [E] Nubbins shall only be used by agreement with the User.
5.19.9.3 [E] Floating heads shall be designed with respective corrosion
allowance applied to the inside and outside of the floating head
and flange. Corrosion allowance on the OD of the flange shall be
added to the recommended edge distance for the selected bolt size.
Page 42 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
5.19.10.4 [E] All kettle type exchangers shall either have a 3-inch minimum
length cylindrical section (includes flanged hub, if any) between
the shell flanges and conical transitions or be provided with other
alternatives for cone-to-flange fit-up and bolting clearance. For
kettle type exchangers with tubesheets integral with the shell, the
minimum length of cylindrical section between the tubesheet and
the conical transition shall be the greater of 3 inches or ( Rt ) ,
where R is the mean radius of the cylindrical section and t is the
thickness of the section.
5.19.11 Instrument, Vent and Drain Connections
5.19.11.1 [E] Additional connections (such as specified by TEMA) shall not
be provided in the nozzle necks.
5.19.11.2 [E] Consideration should be made to placing vents in the
tubesheet to meet specific process needs. When vents/drains are
specified to be in the tubesheet, installation shall be per standard
details. (See PIP VEFV1127.)
5.19.12 Nameplates and Stampings
5.19.12.1 [E] Required nameplate markings shall not be stamped directly on
the exchanger.
5.19.12.2 [E] In addition to required Code information, the following
information shall be stamped on the nameplate:
Page 43 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Clean service
Page 44 of 56
Slurry service
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
High-pressure service
[E] Advantages:
Typically lowest cost design
No gasketed joint between tube side and shell side fluids
Shell side has no gasketed girth joints
Can handle temperature crosses with counterflow designs
Low circumferential bypass area around the bundle
Straight tubes allow mechanical tube side cleaning
[E] Disadvantages:
Shell side cannot be mechanically cleaned
Limited access for internal shell inspection
Limited differential thermal expansion allowed without the
use of an expansion joint
5.20.3.2 U-Tubes
[E] Advantages:
Typically lowest cost removable bundle design
No thermal expansion problems between shell and tubes
Removable bundle for shell side mechanical cleaning
Allows for internal shell inspection
Low circumferential bypass area
Page 45 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
[E] Advantages:
Removable bundle for shell side mechanical cleaning
No thermal expansion problems between shell and tubes
Straight tubes allow mechanical tube side cleaning
Allows for internal shell inspection
[E] Disadvantages:
Higher cost
Internal gasketed joint
Larger circumferential bypass area
Labor intensive to pull bundle
5.20.3.4 TEMA Type T (pull through floating head)
[E] Advantages:
Removable bundle for shell side mechanical cleaning
No thermal expansion problems between shell and tubes
Straight tubes allow mechanical tube side cleaning
Allows for internal shell inspection
[E] Disadvantages:
Highest cost
Internal gasketed joint
Largest circumferential bypass area around the bundle
Page 46 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
[E] The preferred tube size for use in heavy tube side fouling (dirty
service) (0.002 hr ft2 F/BTU or greater) is 1 inch OD. For light tube
side fouling (clean service), 3/4 inch OD tubes are preferred.
5.20.5.2 Length
inches
mm
14*
0.083*
2.1*
16*
0.065*
1.7*
16**
0.065**
1.7**
Titanium
BWG = Birmingham Wire Gauge
* = minimum
** = average
20**
0.035**
1.2**
Page 47 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Tube side inlet temperatures are well above the shell side
stream pour-point temperature.
Page 48 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
Page 49 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
[E] When the cooling water is on the tube side, water velocity
significantly affects the fouling rate, erosion, corrosion, and resulting
maintenance of installed equipment. The Designer should therefore
attempt to select an optimal velocity with considerations given to
installed and maintenance cost. The following tabulated values for
minimum and maximum velocities and maximum tube wall
temperature provide accepted practical limitations. Site-specific water
quality and treatment practices may justify deviations from these
limits.
Page 50 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
CTW
Closed
loop
Brackish
Raw
surface
Seawater
Ferrous
5*
---
---
---
Nonferrous
5*
CTW
Closed
loop
Brackish
Raw
surface
Seawater
Ferrous
10
16
---
---
---
Admiralty
---
---
---
---
Al-Brass
---
---
---
CuproNickel
12
---
Aust. SS
---
16
---
---
---
Monel
16
16
14
14
14
Titanium
16
16
16
16
16
CTW
Closed
loop
Brackish
Raw
surface
Seawater
140
No Limit
140
120
140
Page 51 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
5.20.9 Vibration
[E] The Designer shall include a check for flow-induced tube vibration. The
method of vibration analysis shall be acceptable to the User. The vibration
analysis shall consider, as a minimum, vortex shedding, fluid elastic
instability, turbulence excitation (buffeting), and acoustic resonance.
Generally, the natural frequency (or harmonics) of the tubes should not be
within 20% of the predicted flow vibration frequency produced by any
excitation mode, unless the vibration amplitude is within accepted practices.
6.
Materials
6.1
Material Specifications
[V/E] Materials not specified by the User shall be selected based on known or
anticipated process conditions and approved by the User.
[V/E] The cost of heating the test fluid for shop or future field hydrostatic tests (so
that the temperature of the pressure-resisting components is MDMT plus 30 F during
the test) should be a consideration when selecting the materials of construction and the
associated MDMT to be stamped on the vessel.
6.1.1
External Attachments
[V/E] External attachments welded to pressure-resisting components shall be
made of Code-approved materials. (External attachments such as nozzle
reinforcing pads and stiffening rings are, by Code definition, pressureresisting components.) The material selected is often the same type as the
pressure-resisting component to which it is attached. The selection of the type
of external attachment material and the specific ASME SA material
specification should be made with due consideration being given to the
following:
1. Potential problems associated with welding dissimilar materials
2. Compatibility with the Code nameplate maximum and minimum design
metal temperatures
3. Whether or not the attachment is essential to the structural integrity of
the vessel (see Code Paragraph UCS-66 {AM-204})
4. Differential thermal expansion characteristics and associated stresses
5. Corrosion resistance
6. Painting requirements
7. Suitability for the anticipated loadings
6.1.2
Internal Attachments
[V/E] See Section 5.17 for commentary.
Page 52 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
6.2
Source of Materials
[V/E] If the User restricts sources of fabrication materials, the prospective
manufacturers must be informed at the time of bidding. Some reasons for restrictions
may include, but are not limited to:
6.3
Corrosion/Erosion Allowance
6.3.1
Basis
[V/E] The required design life shall be based on written agreement between
User and Engineering Contractor. Allowances specified by the Designer shall
be based on need and can best be determined by past experience in similar
operating environments. If no past experience is available, such as with a new
process, a materials engineer should examine the process and make judgment
on the expected corrosion rate. Corrosion allowance should not be arbitrary;
rather, it should be compatible with design life requirements.
6.3.2
Corrosion Loss
[V/E] Additional metal thickness must be added to compensate for anticipated
loss due to metal reacting with the environments to which it is subjected
(including cleaning operations, shutdowns, etc.).
6.3.3
6.3.2.1
6.3.2.2
Erosion Loss
[V/E] Additional metal thickness must be added in specific locations where
metal loss is expected due to stream flow that is of high velocity or abrasive
for any reason. Erosion loss usually occurs within a definable area, and
compensation can be made as follows:
Page 53 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Weld overlay of the area with the intent that the overlay is sacrificial
Addition of a welded wear plate with the intent that the plate is
sacrificial
Note: Use caution when using this method in hydrogen service.
6.4
Gaskets
[V/E] In no case shall the nominal thickness of sheet or laminate service gasketing be
greater than 1/16 inch.
7.
Testing
[V/E] All new pressure vessels shall be pressure tested prior to being placed in service. The
following paragraphs provide guidance and references to design and execution considerations
relative to hydrostatic and pneumatic pressure testing.
7.1
Hydrostatic Test
7.1.1
7.1.2
Horizontal Vessels
[V/E] A horizontal vessel designed to support a full weight load of water shall
be tested while resting on its support saddles, without additional supports or
cribbing.
7.1.3
Vertical Vessels
7.1.3.1
7.1.3.2
7.1.3.3
Page 54 of 56
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
7.1.4
Test Temperature
[V/E] See PIP VESV1002, Section 6.3.8.
7.2
Pneumatic Test
[V/E] Caution: Pneumatic testing presents hazards that must be addressed as part
of the engineering design of the pressure vessel.
(Reference Code Paragraph UG-100 {AT-400}, Pneumatic Test and Code
Paragraph UW-50 {Not Division 2 Applicable}, Nondestructive Examination Of
Welds On Pneumatically Tested Vessels.)
[V/E] Due to the additional hazards of pneumatic testing, vessels shall be designed to
minimize the possibility of failure during the test. The vessels shall be constructed of
materials that ensure fracture toughness during the test. Additional nondestructive
examination may be required of main seams, nozzle attachments, and some structural
attachments. All such nondestructive examination shall be performed in accordance
with Code methods and acceptance criteria.
[V/E] Large diameter low-pressure designs, vessels with exceptionally large volume,
service that would not allow residual water in the process, and designs that would
force great overdesign of the vessel and foundation only to support a water full test
may be considered for pneumatic testing.
7.3
Proof Test
[V/E] (Code reference - Paragraph UG-101, Proof Tests To Establish Maximum
Allowable Working Pressure.) Proof tests are highly individualized and are not
included in this Practice.
8.
Impact Factor
[V/E] Unless otherwise specified by the User, a minimum impact factor of 1.5 shall be
applied to the lift weight for designing lifting devices. The basis for the lift weight
must be established during the design phase of the vessel so that the design of lifting
devices includes all components to be included in the lift (e.g., trays,
ladders/platforms, insulation, additional piping with insulation, etc.).
8.2
Vertical Vessels
[V/E] Vertical vessels having h/D ratios greater than 8 and weighing more than
25,000 pounds shall have bending stresses in the vessel shell/skirt checked from the
loadings imposed during the lift from the horizontal to vertical position. Calculated
general primary membrane tensile stress shall not exceed 80% of the materials
specified minimum yield strength at 100 F. Calculated compressive stress shall not
exceed 1.2 times the B factor obtained from the Code. Vessel lifts are recommended to
be made when wind speeds are less than 33% of design wind velocity and the resulting
wind load (at 33% design wind velocity) is included in the consideration of the lift.
Page 55 of 56
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
8.3
REVISION
February 1999
Local Stresses
[V/E] Local stresses in the vessel shell/head/skirt/base rings from the lifting
attachments (e.g., lugs, trunnions, etc.) shall be determined for the imposed loadings
using local stress analysis procedures such as WRC Bulletin 107 or other accepted
local stress analysis procedures (e.g., finite element analysis). For the rigging
condition, the allowable stresses as shown in Section 5.14.9 shall be used.
8.4
Welds
[V/E] Shear stresses for fillet welds on the lifting attachments to the vessel shell/head
shall not exceed 0.55 times the Code-allowable stress {design stress intensity} at 100
F for the material selected.
Page 56 of 56
APPENDIX A
General Considerations
for
Pressure Relief Valve Application
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
DO NOT USE
Polymerization process
Coking service
The point where leakage begins to be a concern when using direct spring-operated valves
depends on the disk seat design. Metal-to-metal contact seats will begin to leak at about 90% of
set pressure. O-ring soft seat disk type direct spring-operated valves will not leak below 95% of
set pressure. Pilot-operated valves will not leak below 98% of set pressure. The recommended
maximum equipment operating pressure is slightly below, but many times considered to be equal
to, the start-to-leak limit for the valve.
Page A-2
APPENDIX B [V]
Welded Pressure
Joint Requirements Form
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
(SEE NOTE 5)
TYPE OF JOINT
NDE
(SEE LETTERED NOTES)
HEAD -TO-SHELL
CATEGORY B
CATEGORY C
NOZZLE FLANGES
CATEGORY D
FIGURE 2-4
SEE GENERAL NOTE (6)
GENERAL NOTES:
1) Unless otherwise indicated, all references on this form are to ASME Code paragraphs, tables, and figures. All nondestructive examination
shall be performed per Code methods.
2) Joints supplied shall be either detailed or identified by use of standard AWS welding symbols on the vessel Manufacturer's drawings.
3) Permanent weld joint backing strips are not permitted.
4) Separate internal nozzle reinforcing plates are not permitted.
5) The flat plate from which formed heads are to be made shall be either seamless or made equivalent to seamless in which all Category A
welds are Type (1) and fully radiographed per UW51 before forming. After forming, the spin hole, if it remains in the final construction, shall
be closed with a metal plug which is butt-welded in place with the weld meeting the Category A weld joint requirements shown in the table.
6) Category D welds shall be per Figure UW-16.1 using full penetration welds through vessel wall and through inside edge of external
reinforcing plates, when used. Nozzle necks designated to extend beyond the inside surface of the vessel wall shall have a fillet weld at the
inside corner.
WELDED PRESSURE
JOINT REQUIREMENTS
PRESSURE VESSELS
EXCLUDING HEAT EXCHANGERS
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWING NUMBER
PAGE 1 OF 2
Page B[V]-2
REVISION
February 1999
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
H. Butt welds exempt from radiography by Paragraph UW-11(a)(4) shall have accessible
surfaces of completed welds MT or PT examined. (Only applies to designs employing
impact-tested steels when Category A joints are based on a joint efficiency of 1.00.)
Item Number:
Vessel Assembly Dwg.:
Reference paragraphs are contained in Division 1 of the ASME Code.
MT = Magnetic Particle Examination
PT = Liquid Penetrant Examination
PAGE 2 OF 2
Page B[V]-3
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
EXAMPLE
Use Of Welded Pressure Joint Requirements Form
To illustrate the use and usefulness of the Welded Pressure Joint Requirements form for communicating welded pressure
joint requirements to manufacturers for quotation and purchase specification purposes, the following completed form shows
the requirements described in Sections 5.6.2.1, 5.6.2.2, 5.6.2.3, and 5.6.2.4. With reference to the lettered Nondestructive
Examination Notes (page 2 of the form), note that other options are available for convenient use or may be provided.
DESIGN BASIS
SHELL AND CONE THICKNESS BASED ON:
JOINT EFFICIENCY. E = __0.85_______
(SEE NOTE 5)
TYPE OF JOINT
NDE
(SEE LETTERED NOTES)
HEAD -TO-SHELL
CATEGORY B
OTHER
B
BODY FLANGES
CATEGORY C
-NOZZLE FLANGES
CATEGORY D
GENERAL NOTES:
1)
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL REFERENCES ON THIS FORM ARE TO ASME CODE PARAGRAPHS.
TABLES AND FIGURES. ALL NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER CODE METHODS.
2)
JOINTS SUPPLIED SHALL BE EITHER DETAILED OR IDENTIFIED BY USE OF STANDARD AWS WELDING
SYMBOLS ON THE VESSEL MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS.
3)
PERMANENT WELD JOINT BACKING STRIPS ARE NOT PERMITTED.
4)
SEPARATE INTERNAL NOZZLE REINFORCING PLATES ARE NOT PERMITTED.
5)
THE FLAT PLATE FROM WHICH FORMED HEADS ARE TO BE MADE SHALL BE EITHER SEAMLESS OR MADE
EQUIVALENT TO SEAMLESS IN WHICH ALL CATEGORY A WELDS ARE TYPE (1) AND FULLY RADIOGRAPHED
PER UW51 BEFORE FORMING. AFTER FORMING, THE SPIN HOLE, IF IT REMAINS IN THE FINAL
CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE REPAIRED WITH A METAL PLUG THAT IS BUTT-WELDED IN PLACE WITH THE
WELD MEETING THE CATEGORY. A WELD JOINT REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE.
6)
CATEGORY D WELDS SHALL BE PER FIG. UW-16.1 USING FULL PENETRATION WELDS THROUGH VESSEL
WALL AND THROUGH INSIDE EDGE OF EXTERNAL REINFORCING PLATES WHEN USED. NOZZLE NECKS
DESIGNATED TO EXTEND BEYOND THE INSIDE SURFACE OF THE VESSEL WALL SHALL HAVE A FILLET WELD
AT THE INSIDE CORNER.
WELDED PRESSURE
JOINT REQUIREMENTS
PRESSURE VESSELS
EXCLUDING HEAT EXCHANGERS
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWING NUMBER
PAGE 1 OF 2
Page B[V]-4
APPENDIX B [E]
Welded Pressure
Joint Requirements Form
REVISION
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
February 1999
SHELL
(SEE NOTE 5)
TYPE OF JOINT
NDE
(SEE LETTERED NOTES)
HEAD-TO-SHELL
CATEGORY B
SIDE
CATEGORY C
TUBESHEETS
FIGURE UW-13.2
NOZZLE FLANGES
FIGURE 2-4
CATEGORY D
CATEGORY A
TUBE
HEAD-TO-CHANNEL
CATEGORY B
SIDE
CATEGORY C
BODY FLANGES
FIGURE 2-4
NOZZLE FLANGES
FIGURE 2-4
CATEGORY D
GENERAL NOTES:
1) Unless otherwise indicated, all references on this form are to ASME Code paragraphs, tables and figures. All nondestructive examination
shall
be performed per Code methods.
2) Joints supplied shall be either detailed or identified by use of standard AWS welding symbols on the vessel Manufacturer's drawings.
3) Permanent weld joint backing strips are not permitted.
4) Separate internal nozzle reinforcing plates are not permitted.
5) The flat plate from which formed heads are to be made shall be either seamless or made equivalent to seamless in which all Category A
welds
are Type (1) and fully radiographed per UW51 before forming. After forming, the spin hole, if it remains in the final construction, shall be
closed with a metal plug which is butt-welded in place with the weld meeting the Category A weld joint requirements shown in the table.
6) Category D welds shall be per Figure UW-16.1 using full penetration welds through vessel wall and through inside edge of external
reinforcing
plates, when used. Nozzle necks designated to extend beyond the inside surface of the vessel wall shall have a fillet weld at the inside corner.
WELDED PRESSURE
JOINT REQUIREMENTS
SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
DATE
DRAWING NUMBER
PAGE 1 OF 2
Page B[E]-2
REVISION
February 1999
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
H. Butt welds exempt from radiography by Paragraph UW-11(a)(4) shall have accessible
surfaces of completed welds MT or PT examined. (Only applies to designs employing
impact-tested steels when Category A joints are based on a joint efficiency of 1.00.)
J.
Page B[E]-3
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Item Number:
Vessel Assembly Dwg.:
Reference paragraphs are contained in Division 1 of the ASME Code.
MT = Magnetic Particle Examination
PT = Liquid Penetrant Examination
PAGE 2 OF 2
Page B[E]-4
APPENDIX C
Equivalent Pressure Formulas for
Bending Moment and Axial Tensile Load
PIP VECV1001
Vessel/S&T Heat Exchanger Design Criteria
ASME Code Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2
REVISION
February 1999
Equivalent Pressure Formulas for Bending Moment and Axial Tensile Load
When sustained bending moments or axial thrust loadings are applied to the flanged joint during
operation in sufficient magnitude to warrant consideration in the flange design, the design
pressure, P, used in the calculation of total hydrostatic end load, H, in the flange design
calculations should be replaced by the following design pressure:
PFLG = P + PEQ
The equivalent pressure PEQ is determined as follows:
PEQ =
16M
G
4F
G 2
Where:
M = Sustained bending moment applied across full section at flange during the design
condition, in-lb
F = Sustained axial tensile force applied at flange, lb
G = Diameter at location of gasket load reaction, in (See Appendix 2 {Appendix 3} of the
Code for full definition.)
Note: Experience has shown that axial tensile forces resulting from a properly
designed piping system have no significant effect on the flange design and hence are
typically not included in the PEQ determination.
Therefore, the hydrostatic end load, H, used in the flange calculations is determined as follows:
H = 0.785 G2 PFLG
8M
G 3
Where:
M = Bending moment, as defined above, but including dynamic bending moment (e.g.,
seismic moment) applied across full section at flange during the design condition, in-lb
Other Terms = Same as above
Page C-2
APPENDIX D
Minimum Clearance for
Nozzle Adjacent to Integral Tubesheet