Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
National Die & Mold CAD Engineering Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Huashan Rd., Shanghai 200030, China
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 28 September 2014
Received in revised form
10 March 2015
Accepted 10 March 2015
Available online 18 March 2015
Due to its good toughness and high weldability, SA508-III steel has been widely used in the components
manufacturing of reactor pressure vessels (RPV) and steam generators (SG). In this study, the hot
deformation behaviors of SA508-III steel are investigated by isothermal hot compression tests with
forming temperature of (9501250)1C and strain rate of (0.0010.1)s 1, and the corresponding ow
stress curves are obtained. According to the experimental results, quantitative analysis of work
hardening and dynamic softening behaviors is presented. The critical stress and critical strain for
initiation of dynamic recrystallization are calculated by setting the second derivative of the third order
polynomial. Based on the classical stressdislocation relation and the kinetics of dynamic recrystallization, a two-stage constitutive model is developed to predict the ow stress of SA508-III steel.
Comparisons between the predicted and measured ow stress indicate that the established
physically-based constitutive model can accurately characterize the hot deformations for the steel.
Furthermore, a successful numerical simulation of the industrial upsetting process is carried out by
implementing the developed constitutive model into a commercial software, which evidences that the
physically-based constitutive model is practical and promising to promote industrial forging process for
nuclear components.
& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
SA508-III steel
Work hardening
Dynamic recrystallization
Flow stress
Forging
1. Introduction
Knowledge of the high-temperature deformation behavior of
metals and alloys is very important for the numerical modeling of
many industrial processes. Prerequisite for a successful modeling of
hot working processes by means of numerical techniques, such as
nite element and nite difference methods, one of the most
important items is a precise establishment of the constitutive equations which describe the dependence of the ow stress on strain,
strain rate and temperature. Therefore, an accurate constitutive
equation for the work-hardening and softening behavior is essential.
Meanwhile, the understanding of ow behavior of metals and alloys at
high temperature is of great importance for designers for hot forming
process, such as hot forging, rolling and extrusion. In the last two
decades, considerable investigations have been attempted to develop
constitutive equations of materials from the experimentally measured
data to describe the hot deformation behavior [15].
n
Corresponding authors at: National Die & Mold CAD Engineering Research
Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Huashan Rd., Shanghai 200030, China.
E-mail addresses: feechn@gmail.com, fei.chen@nottingham.ac.uk (F. Chen),
cuizs@sjtu.edu.cn (Z. Cui).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.036
0921-5093/& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
RPV and SG are the key components of nuclear power equipment which dominate the lifespan of nuclear power plants. At
present, ASME SA508-III steel has been extensively used as the
materials of RPV and SG due to its high strength and toughness to
prevent failure under severe working conditions [6]. As a key
equipment of the ultra-super-critical generator set, the RPV and SG
should have good mechanical properties through hot forging. In
the past, many investigations have been carried out on the
behavior of SA508-III steel. Kim et al. investigated the failure
behaviors of the weld heat-affected zones, strain aging and fatigue
crack propagation under certain experiment conditions [7]. At the
same time, a new heat treatment process was developed to
improve the toughness for SA508-III steel by Kim et al. [8]. Lee
et al. studied the relationship of the composition, structure and
mechanical properties for the steel [9]. Liu et al. studied the
fracture toughness of SA508-III steel in the temperature range
from room temperature to 320 1C using the J-integral method [10].
Based on the literature reviewed above, it is found that the
previous studies mainly focus on the service performance of
SA508-III steel. However, there are only few reports on the
properties of SA508-III steel during hot forming process. Therefore,
in order to study the workability and to optimize the hot forging
processing parameters, it is highly necessary to investigate the
104
Table 1
The chemical composition of SA508-3 forging billet (wt%).
C
0.18
Si
0.17
Mn
1.4
Cr
0.14
Mo
0.51
Ni
0.79
Cu
0.04
S
0.003
P
0.005
V
0.005
Al
0.022
N
0.008
Co
0.0008
As
0.004
Sn
0.0042
O
0.006
H
0.0003
Sb
0.00005
1250C, 300s
Temperature (C)
10C/s
Deformation
30s
10C/s
Deformation temperature:
950-1250C with 100C interval
Strain rate:0.001,0.005,0.01,0.1/s
Strain:0.6
2. Experimental procedures
Water quenching
Time (s)
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of hot deformation process used in the experiments.
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
True stress(MPa)
True stress(MPa)
950C
1050C
1150C
80
60
1250C
950C
1150C
80
40
20
20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
0.0
0.6
1250C
60
40
0
0.0
1050C
100
0.1
0.2
160
160
140
140
120
120
950C
1050C
100
1150C
1250C
80
60
20
0.3
True strain
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
950C
1050C
1150C
1250C
60
20
0.2
0.5
80
40
0.1
0.4
100
40
0
0.0
0.3
True strain
True stress(MPa)
True strain
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
True strain
Fig. 2. Flow stressstrain curves of the SA508-III steel in different temperatures at the same strain rates (a) 0.001 s 1, (b) 0.005 s 1, (c) 0.01 s 1 and (d) 0.1 s 1.
750
750
950C
1050C
1150C
1250C
450
300
150
0
-150
10
20
30
40
50
60
950C
1050C
1150C
1250C
600
Work hardening Rate( )
600
450
300
150
0
-150
15
70
30
45
60
75
90
400
300
200
100
0
-100
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
500
105
950C
1050C
1150C
1250C
700
500
300
100
-100
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Fig. 3. Work hardening rate versus true stress on the strain rate (a) 0.001 s 1, (b) 0.005 s 1, (c) 0.01 s 1 and (d) 0.1 s 1.
a heating rate of 10 1C/s and held for 5 min and then cooled to the
test temperature at the cooling rate of 10 1C/s. Then, the specimens
were held at the forming temperature for 30 s to get a uniform
temperature distribution. The tests were performed at 950 1C,
1050 1C, 1150 1C and 1250 1C and strain rates of 0.001 s 1,
0.005 s 1, 0.01 s 1 and 0.1 s 1, respectively. The true stressstrain
curves were recorded automatically in the isothermal compression
process. All specimens were compressed to a true stain of 0.6 and
then instantly quenched into cold water in order to preserve the
hot deformation microstructure. In order to minimize the friction
between the specimen and the die during hot compression, the
at ends of the specimens were covered by a lubricant consisting
of graphite powder and machine oil. Finally, the quenched specimens were sliced along the axial section. All specimens were
sliced along the axial section and etched with (5 g saturated picric
acid 4 g SDBS 100 mL H2O) solution at 65 75 1C, and then
etching time varied from 10 s to 60 s to reveal austenite grain
boundaries. The optical micrographs were recorded. Microstructure evolution was observed by using Axio Imager M2m (Zeiss).
The grain size was determined by using the line intercept method
in two vertical directions as per ASTM E112-88 [11]. The distance
between adjacent parallel lines was 10 m, and the total true
length of the measuring line exceeded 1000 mm. The average
grain size characterized as equivalent circle diameter was
106
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
ln
ln
-1
-5
-5
-6
-7
-8
3.0
-6
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-7
-8
5.0
20
40
60
lnp
100
120
140
2.0
-1
1.5
-2
ln(sinh( p))
-3
ln
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-1.0
80
p(MPa)
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
ln(sinh( p))
1.0
0.5
0.0
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-0.5
1.5
-1.0
6.5x10 -4
2.0
0.001s -1
0.005s -1
0.01s -1
0.1s -1
7.0x10 -4
7.5x10 -4
8.0x10 -4
8.5x10 -4
1/T
0
Fig. 4. Plots used for calculation of hot deformation constants (a) , (b) n , (c) n, and (d) value of slope.
36
34
32
30
lnZ
28
26
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
24
3.2. Critical strain for DRX
During hot deformation process, it is generally accepted that
only when strain reaches a critical value can DRX occur [12]. The
values of work hardening rate are obtained by using the
following equation [1315]:
i 1 _
j _ ; T: i 1
j ; T:
i 1 i 1
22
-1.0
-0.6
-0.2
0.2
0.6
1.0
1.4
1.8
ln(sinh( p))
Fig. 5. Plot used regression determinate the relationship ln Z versus ln sinh p .
A1 3 A2 2 A3 A4
107
-0.5
-1.0
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
ln c
ln p
-1.5
-2.5
-2.0
-3.0
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-2.5
-3.0
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-3.5
-4.0
22
36
24
26
28
lnZ
30
32
34
lnZ
2.0
1.5
1.5
ln (sinh( ss ))
ln (sinh(sat ))
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-0.5
-1.0
22
24
26
28
lnZ
30
32
34
0.5
0.0
-0.5
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
-1.0
36
-1.5
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
lnZ
Fig. 6. Plot used regression determinate the relationship ln p (a), ln c (b), ln sinh sat (c), and ln sinh ss (d) versus ln Z.
3.7
d
3A1 2 2A2 A3
d
d
6A1 2A2
d 2
3.5
ln 0
3.9
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
21
A
c 2
3A1
T=950C
T=1050C
T=1150C
T=1250C
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
lnZ
Fig. 7. Relationship between ln 0 and ln Z.
2A32
27A21
A2 A3
A4
3A1
0c can be expressed as
0c A3
A22
3A1
108
Fig. 8. Microstructure of tested steel at strain rate 0.1 s 1on different deformation temperature (a) 950 1C, (b) 1050 1C, (c) 1150 1C and (d) 1250 1C; (e) strain rate 0.01 s 1
and (f) strain rate 0.001 s 1 at deformation temperature 1150 1C.
A
A
4
3
3A1
3A1
27A21 3A1
A2
3A1
p 1:384 10 3 Z 0:1715
19
c 0:0004 Z 0:19602
20
21
22
0 2:1829Z 0:08901
23
22
14
20
ln _
n
ln sinh p
18
15
16
T constant
ln sinh p
16
Q act Rn
1=T
_ constant
According to the relationship of ln sinh p versus 1=T, the
linear slope increases with the increase of strain rate, the average
value of these slopes is 9434.037 as shown in Fig. 4d. According to
Eq. (16), the Qact of SA508-III steel during hot deformation can be
obtained as 376,088 J/mol.
Fig. 5 illustrates the relationship between ln Z and ln sinh p .
Eq. (17) can be obtained by taking the logarithm of both sides of Eq.
(12).
ln Z n ln sinh p ln A
17
By regression from the resultant equation in Fig. 5, a new
equation was obtained as following:
!
376:088 103
Z _ exp
8:5983 1011
RT
4:6899
sinh0:019 p
18
In order to establish the expression of feature parameters, the
values of characteristic points such as peak strain p , critical
strain c , saturation stress s and steady-state stress ss can be
easily obtained from the ow stress curves. Fig. 6 ad shows that
the linear relation exist between ln p , ln c , lnsinh s , and
lnki
"
14
lnk1
12
lnk2
k1 value Line Fit
10
8
6
4
2
0
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
lnZ
Fig. 9. Plot used regression determinate the relationship between ln ki and ln Z.
6
5
4
3
ln(-ln(1-Xdrx))
109
T=1050C,0.01s
T=1150C,0.01s
T=1250C,0.01s
T=1050C,0.1s
T=1150C,0.1s
T=1250C,0.1s
T=1050C,0.001s
T=1150C,0.001s
T=1250C,0.001s
T=1050C,0.005s
T=1150C,0.005s
T=1250C,0.005s
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-3
-2
-1
0
ln((c)/p)
110
80
100
-1
0.1s
-1
0.01s
-1
0.005s
-1
0.001s
60
40
20
0
0.0
100
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
80
60
40
20
0
0.0
0.6
-1
0.1s
-1
0.01s
-1
0.005s
-1
0.001s
0.1
0.2
Strain
80
60
40
20
0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.6
100
-1
0.1s
-1
0.01s
-1
0.005s
-1
0.001s
100
0.3
Strain
0.2
0.3
Strain
0.4
0.5
0.6
80
60
40
-1
0.1s
-1
0.01s
-1
0.005s
-1
0.001s
20
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Strain
Fig. 11. Dynamic recrystallization fraction for SA508- steel under the different strain rates with deformation temperature: (a) 950 1C, (b) 1050 1C, (c) 1150 1C and
(d) 1250 1C.
160
160
140
120
True stress(MPa)
True stress(MPa)
140
950C
100
1050C
80
1150C
1250C
60
1150C
0.4
0.5
0
0.0
0.6
0.1
0.2
140
1150C
1250C
80
60
80
60
20
20
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1150C 1250C
100
40
0.1
0.6
120
40
0.0
1050C
1050C
100
0.5
-1
950C
120
0.4
160
-1
True stress(MPa)
140
0.3
True strain
True strain
160
1250C
60
20
0.3
1050C
80
20
0.2
950C
100
40
0.1
120
40
0
0.0
111
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
True strain
True strain
Fig. 12. Comparisons experimental and predicted ow stress value of SA508- steel under various hot deformation conditions.
relation and the kinematical recrystallization proposed by Laasraoui and Jonas [22,23], the ow stress constitutive equations of
the WH-DRV period and DRX period were established, respectively. According to effects of the WH and DRV, the evolution of
the dislocation density with strain is generally considered to
depend on the following two components [2426]:
p
d
k1 k2
d
24
26
Fig. 13. Correlation between the experimental and predicted ow stress data from
the developed constitutive equation.
112
Start
Input data
t=t+t
Read simulation results
Strain increment
Yes
No
Yes
No
Output data
End
Fig. 14. Flowchart of the secondary development of the ow stress subroutine.
WH s 0 s e
k
22
; o
c
27
According to the strain and stress determined by the experiment ow stress curves, k2 can be calculated under deformation
conditions. Therefore, Eq. (27) is derived as
2
0 s
28
k2 ln
WH s
p
k1 can also be calculated from Eq. (26) and b .
Considering the shear modulus changes with deformation
temperature, the equation [28] can be expressed as
0
k1 @
0 1 0:91
T 300
Tm
A s k2
29
25000
Strain rate:0.1s-1
20000
Load Force, N
15000
1050C
10000
1150C
5000
1250C
0
0.0
k2 A1 Z n1
1.5
3.0
k2 319:1847Z 0:0788
31
At high temperatures and low strain rates the DRX phenomenon is more obvious. The volume fraction of DRX (Xdrx) can be
determined by [2527,29]:
c ndrx
X drx 1 exp kdrx
; Z c
32
6.0
7.5
Fig. 15. Variation of anvil load force with stroke for SA508-III steel under strain
rates 0.1 s 1with deformation temperature: (a) 950 1C, (b) 1050 1C, (c) 1150 1C and
(d) 1250 1C.
WH
; Z c
s ss
33
c ndrx
; Z c
WH s ss 1 exp kdrx
34
30
4.5
Stroke,mm
X drx
where 0 is the shear modulus when temperature is 300 K, Tm is
melting point. Therefore, regression model can be established in
the Eq. (24). A1 and n1 are constants, so the value of k1, k2 can be
determined in Fig. 9.
950C
Experiment
Simulation
where X drx is the volume fraction of DRX. kdrx and ndrx are DRX
parameters depending on chemical composition and hot deformation conditions.
Then, Eq. (32) can be rewritten as following,
c
ln ln1 X drx ln kdrx ndrx ln
35
The relationship between ln ln1 X drx and ln c =p
is used to determine kdrx and ndrx . As shown in Fig. 10, the kinetic
model of DRX can be acquired with the average value of kdrx and
113
Fig. 16. The forming process of experiment (a) preheating of the die, (b) initial forging state, (c) nal 80% reduction forming and (d) dimension measurement.
Table 2
Simulation conditions for the hot upsetting experiments.
Process condition
Value of parameter
1200 1C
300 1C
H13
56018
16958
16866
0.02 N/s/mm/1C
5 N/s/mm/oC
0.3
2 mm/s
0.1 s/step
0.5 mm/step
summarized as
8
k
22
>
; o c
>
> WH s 0 s e
>
n
h
io
>
>
c ndrx
>
; Z c
> WH s ss 1 exp kdrx
>
p
>
>
>
>
0:08901
>
0 2:1829Z
>
>
>
>
>
c 0:0004 Z 0:19602
>
>
>
>
>
< p 0:001384 Z 0:17152 ;
1
>
0:003646Z 0:2092
> s 52:687 sinh
>
>
>
>
>
>
ss 52:687 sinh 1 0:002805Z 0:2070
>
>
>
>
>
>
0:0788
>
>
> k2 319:1847Z
>
>
>
kdrx 0:6949; ndrx 1:7916
>
>
>
>
: Z _ exp 376088
RT
37
c
X drx 1 exp 0:6949
P
1:7916 !
36
114
Fig. 17. The results of numerical simulation (a) strain-effective and (b) stress-effective.
1200000
Experiment
Simulation
Load Force, N
1000000
800000
600000
400000
200000
0
10
20
30
Stroke,mm
40
50
Fig. 18. Comparison between the load of FEM simulation and the experimental
results.
1 XN Y i X i
100%
i1 X
N
i
39
where Xi, Yi are the measured and predicted ow stress, respectively. X, Y are the mean values of Xi and Yi, respectively. N is the
total number of data used in this investigation. The calculated
correlation coefcient (R) is 0.997, which indicates that there is a
good correlation between the predicted and measured data.
Meanwhile, the average absolute relative error (AARE) is only
3.26%, which illustrates the good prediction capability of the
developed model. Therefore, the developed constitutive equation
can be applied to numerical simulation for describing the ow
behavior of the SA508- steel under the elevated forming
temperature.
4.3. Experimental verication
In order to carry out numerical simulation of hot forging, the
developed consitituve euqations were implemented into three
dimensional DEFORM commercial software. Fig. 14 gives the
owchart of secondary development of the ow stress subroutine.
5. Conclusions
In this study, the hot deformation behavior of SA508-III steel
has been investigated by means of the compression test over a
practical range of temperatures and strain rates. The ow stress
constitutive equations for the work hardening-dynamical recovery
period and dynamical recrystallization period were developed for
SA508-III steel. By comparing the predicted and measured results,
it is conrmed that the proposed constitutive equations can be
used in numerical simulation in hot forming process of SA508-III
steel. By integrating the developed ow stress model into DEFORM3D, a three-dimensional hot upsetting experiment in the
115
[8] B.J. Lee, H.D. Kim, J.H. Hong, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 29 (1998) 1441.
[9] K.H. Lee, S.G. Park, M.C. Kim, B.S. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 534 (2012) 75.
[10] J. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Song, J. Luo, D. Yuan, Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater. 21
(2014) 1187.
[11] Y. Estrin, Unied Constitutive Laws of Plastic Deformation, Academic Press,
New York (1996) 69.
[12] F. Chen, Z.S. Cui, S.J. Chen, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 5073.
[13] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 127.
[14] Y.C. Lin, X.M. Chen, Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 1733.
[15] E.I. Poliak, J.J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 43 (2003) 684.
[16] Y. Deng, Z.M. Yin, J.W. Huang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 1780.
[17] A. Laasraouia, J.J. Jonas, Metall. Trans. A 22 (1991) 151.
[18] C. Zener, H.J. Hollomon, Appl. Phys. 15 (1944) 22.
[19] C.M. Sellars, Acta Met. 14 (1966) 1136.
[20] J. Jonas, C.M. Sellars, Int. Metal. Rev. 14 (1969) 1.
[21] H. Shi, A.J. McLaren, C.M. Sellars, R. Shahani, R. Bolingbroke, Mater. Sci.
Technol. 13 (1997) 210.
[22] A. Laasraouia, J.J. Jonas, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 22 (1991) 1545.
[23] H. Merking, U.F. Kocks, Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 1865.
[24] U.F. Kocks, A. Argon, M. Ashby, Prog. Mater. Sci. 19 (1975) 1.
[25] C.M. Sellars, Acta Met. 14 (1966) 1136.
[26] J.H. Beynon, C.M. Sellars, ISIJ Int. 32 (1992) 359.
[27] Z.Y. Zeng, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 27 (2011) 913.
[28] N.M. Xiao, C.W. Zheng, D.Z. Li, Y.Y. Li, Comput. Mater. Sci. 41 (2008) 366.
[29] Y.C. Lin, X.M. Chen, D.X. Wen, M.S. Chen, Comput. Mater. Sci. 83 (2014) 282.