Correlations for Heat Transfer Coefficients

Each flow geometry requires different correlations be used to obtain heat transfer coefficients. Initially, we
will look at correlations for fluids flowing in conduits.
Most correlations will take the "Nusselt form":

The correlations that follow are limited to conduit flow without phase change. Different geometries,
boiling, and condensation will be covered in later lectures. Frictional heating (viscous dissipation) is not
included in these correlations. This should not be a problem, since this phenomena is typically neglected
except for highly viscous flows or gases at high mach numbers.
Unless otherwise specified, fluid properties should be evaluated at the "bulk average" temperature -- the
arithmetic mean of the inlet and outlet temperatures:

Choosing a Correlation
When choosing a correlation, begin by asking:
1. What is the geometry? (Flow through a pipe, around an object, over a plane, etc.)
2. Is there a phase change?
3. What is the flow regime? (Check the Reynolds number to decide on laminar, transition, or turbulent
flow.)
4. If the flow is laminar, is natural convection important? (The Grashof number will be used for this.)

Turbulent Conduit Flow -- No Phase Change

The historic equation for use in turbulent conduit flow is the Dittus-Boelter Correlation (MSH Eq. 12.32):

The exponent on the Prandtl number depends on the service -- 0.4 is used for heating and 0.3 for cooling.
Different values are needed because of the variation of viscosity with temperature.
Heating and cooling effect the velocity profile of a flowing fluid differently because of the temperature
dependence of viscosity. Heating usually makes the fluid near the wall less viscous, so the flow profile
becomes more "plug-like." Cooling has the opposite effect, increasing the viscosity near the wall and
impeding heat transfer. The effect is most pronounced for viscous flows with large wall -- bulk temperature
differences.
Instead of using different exponents for heating and cooling, a direct correction for viscosity can be used.
This takes the form of the ratio of the viscosity at the bulk fluid temperature to the viscosity at the wall
temperature. The ratio is then raised to the 0.14 power.

When this is added, the result is the Seider-Tate Correlation (MSH Eq. 12.33), the correlation recommended
for use in this class:

Seider-Tate applies to "normal" fluids in turbulent flow in long, straight pipes, so:

Multiplicative correction factors are available to adjust for the entrance/exit consequences of short tubes:

and for pipe curvature

If the conduit does not have a circular cross-section, the inside diameter should everywhere be replaced by
the equivalent diameter

Transitional Conduit Flow -- No Phase Change

Levenspiel (1998) recommends the following correlation for transition flow. The entrance effect correction
may be omitted for "long" conduits.

Laminar Conduit Flow -- No Phase Change

Many of the laminar flow correlations are set up in terms of the Graetz Number. McCabe et al. define this as

but many other works do not limit evaluation to cylindrical geometries, and use

which differs from the MSH value by a factor of Pi/4. Consequently, you must be very careful to use the
form that matches the correlation you are using. Those that follow are based on the standard form, NOT the
MSH form.
Two correlations are provided for laminar flow, depending on the magnitude of the Graetz number. For
Gz<100

which approaches a limiting value of 3.66 in long pipes with uniform wall temperature (see MSH Fig, p.
344). For Gz>100, use

Both of these may need to be corrected when natural convection is significant.

Laminar Flow and Free Convection

Heat usually causes the density of a fluid to change. Less dense fluid tends to rise, while the more dense fluid
falls. The result is circulation -- "natural" or "free" convection. This movement raises h values in slow
moving fluids near surfaces, but is rarely significant in turbulent flow. Thus, it is necessary to check and
compensate for free convection only in laminar flow problems.
The Grashof Number is used to assess the impact of natural convection (MSH Eq. 12.66):

It makes use of the coefficient of volume expansion:

The fluid properties used to calculate the Grashof number should be evaluated at the film temperature, the
arithmetic mean between the bulk and wall temperatures. This will require determining an additional set of
property values.
The Grashof Number provides a measure of the significance of natural convection. When the Grashof
Number is greater than 1000, heat transfer coefficients should be corrected to reflect the increase due to free
circulation. Multiplicative correction factors are available to apply to the Nusselt Number or the heat transfer
coefficient (do NOT use both). These are:

References:
1. Brodkey, R.S. and H.C. Hershey, Transport Phenomena: A Unified Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1988,
pp. 510-15.
2. Levenspiel, O., Engineering Flow and Heat Exchange, Revised Edition, Plenum Press, 1998, pp.
173-78, 182-84.
3. McCabe, W.L., J.C. Smith, and P. Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (5th Edition),
McGraw-Hill, 1993, pp. 330-31, 333-34, 336-37, 339-41, 344-48, 353-55, 362-68.
4. McCabe, W.L., J.C. Smith, and P. Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (6th Edition),
McGraw-Hill, 2001, pp. 336-37, 339-40, 342-49, 365-71.