Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
EVEN by the standards of the worst financial crisis for at least a generation, the
events of Sunday September 14th 2008 and the day before were extraordinary. The
weekend began with hopes that a deal could be struck, with or without government
backing, to save Lehman Brothers, Americas fourth-largest investment bank. Early
Monday morning Lehman filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. It has more
than $613 billion of debt.() Lehman Brothers one of the oldest and the most
successful investment banks
The biggest worry is the effect on derivatives markets, particularly the giant one for
credit-default swaps. Lehman is a top-ten counterparty in CDSs, holding contracts
with a notional value of almost $800 billion. On Sunday, banks called in their
derivatives traders to assess their exposures to Lehman and work on mitigating
risks. The Securities and Exchange Commission, Lehmans main regulator, said it is
working with the bank to protect clients and trading partners and to maintain
orderly markets.
2
This left Lehman with no option but to prepare for bankruptcy. Though the bank
has access to a Fed lending facility, introduced after Bears takeover by JP
Morgan Chase, the collapse of its share price left it unable to raise new equity
and facing crippling downgrades from rating agencies.
Moreover, rival firms that had continued to trade with it in recent weeks at
the urging of regulators had begun to pull away in the past few days.
The inability to find a buyer is a huge blow to Lehmans 25,000 employees, who
own a third of the companys now-worthless stock; in such a difficult
environment, most will struggle to find work at other financial firms. It also
makes for an ignominious end to the career of Dick Fuld, Lehmans boss since
1994, who until last year was viewed as one of Wall Streets smartest
managers.
3
4
5
6
7
8
Sources: Bank of England, Bloomberg, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Debt Management Office, London Stock Exchange, Merrill Lynch,
Thomson Datastream and Bank calculations.
(a) The liquidity index shows the number of standard deviations from the mean. It is a simple unweighted average of nine liquidity measures,
normalised on the period 19992004. The series shown is an exponentially weighted moving average. The indicator is more reliable after 1997
as it is based on a greater number of underlying measures. The recent fall in the indicator is largely due to a sharp decline in the interbank
9
market liquidity measure.
US
Euro Area
UK
10
05 June 2009
05 March 2009
05 December 2008
05 September 2008
05 June 2008
05 March 2008
05 December 2007
05 September 2007
05 June 2007
05 March 2007
05 December 2006
05 September 2006
05 June 2006
05 March 2006
05 December 2005
05 September 2005
05 June 2005
05 March 2005
05 December 2004
05 September 2004
05 June 2004
05 March 2004
05 December 2003
05 September 2003
05 June 2003
05 March 2003
05 December 2002
05 September 2002
05 June 2002
05 March 2002
05 December 2001
05 September 2001
05 June 2001
05 March 2001
05 December 2000
05 September 2000
05 June 2000
05 March 2000
10
11
Source: Eichengreen, Moby, Nedeljkovic and Sarno (2009).
12
Source: Eichengreen, Moby, Nedeljkovic and Sarno (2009).
US I NT EREST RAT ES
Euribor 3M
4
10Y
10Y
Eonia
Repo
3
Libor 3m
2
Discount
1
Fed Funds
Libor O/N
3M
0
0
J
O N
F M
M J
O N D
0
J
A S
O N
D J
F M A M
A S
O N D
US BOND 10Y
US DISCOUNT RATE
US T-Bi ll 3M
ECB REPO
EURIBOR 3 M
EONIA
13
14
Source: Eichengreen, Moby, Nedeljkovic and Sarno (2009).
15
Source: Bank of England
10/11/2008
-800 -750 -700 -650 -600 -550 -500 -450 -400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
BNPParibas
Fortis
IKB
Credit Suisse
LehmanBrothers
MorganStanley
RBS
WellsFargo
JPMorgan
National City
Bankof America
HSBC
UBS
WashingtonMutual
Merryll Lynch
Citigroup
Wachovia
ASIA
EUROPE
AMERICAS
WORLD
-800 -750 -700 -650 -600 -550 -500 -450 -400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Capital raised(USDbn)
16
Source IMF
17
18
Source: IMF
140
1.50
120
160
140
120
-5
100
-10
80
-15
60
-20
40
-25
20
-30
1.40
100
1.30
80
1.20
60
1.10
40
1.00
20
0.90
0.80
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
19
20
Source :IMF; WEO Nov 08
Europe in recession
Bad news for investment
E MU: GDP Gr owth and Ca pa c ity Utilis a tion r a tes
1/12/08
5.00
85
4.50
84
4.00
3.50
83
3.00
2.50
82
2.00
81
1.50
1.00
80
0.50
79
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
21
USA in recession
Unemployment soaring towards 7% - 8%...
US Une mployment and Cons umption E x penditur es (inv er te d)
1/12/08
8.00
-1
7.50
0
7.00
1
6.50
6.00
5.50
3
5.00
4
4.50
5
4.00
3.50
6
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
22
Europe in recession
Germany
E ur oz one and Ge r ma ny GDP Gr owth r a te s (qoq% )
1/12/08
2.00
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
-0.50
-0.50
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
23
Europe in recession
Spain
S P AIN: HOUS ING S E CTOR AND GDP GROW TH
1/12/08
30
10
20
9
10
8
0
-10
-20
6
-30
5
-40
-50
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
24
Europe in recession
E MU: GDP Gr owth and Ca pa c ity Utilis a tion r a tes
1/12/08
5.00
85
4.50
84
4.00
3.50
83
3.00
2.50
82
2.00
81
1.50
1.00
80
0.50
79
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
25
26
27
0
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
-1
-2
France
Germany
Spain
UK
US
20
07
20
05
20
03
20
01
19
99
19
97
19
95
19
93
19
91
19
89
19
87
19
85
19
83
19
81
19
79
19
77
19
75
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
29
2005Q1
2003Q2
2001Q3
1999Q4
1998Q1
1996Q2
1994Q3
1992Q4
1991Q1
1989Q2
1987Q3
1985Q4
1984Q1
1982Q2
1980Q3
1978Q4
1977Q1
1975Q2
1973Q3
1971Q4
1970Q1
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
31
32 / 12
Source: Wray, 2007, Lessons from the Subprime Meltdown
3232
Money savers
1.
2.
3.
4.
Households
Companies
Government
Central Bank
Financial Markets
Money Markets
Debt Markets
Equities Markets
Money spenders
1.
2.
3.
Companies
Government
Households
Direct Finance
34
35
37
38
Treasury bills
Certificates of deposit
Commercial Paper
Bankers Acceptances
Eurodollars
Repurchase Agreements (RPs) and Reverse RPs
Federal Funds
LIBOR
39
40
The interest rate that equates the present value of cash flow
payments received from a debt instrument with
its value today
YIELD TO MATURITY IS THE MOST ACCURATE MEASURE OF
INTEREST RATES
41
42
Coupon Bond
When the coupon bond is priced at its face value, the yield to
maturity equals the coupon rate
The price of a coupon bond and the yield to maturity are negatively
related
The yield to maturity is greater than the coupon rate when the bond
price is below its face value
44
Consol or Perpetuity
A bond with no maturity date that does not repay principal but
pays fixed coupon payments forever
P = C / ic
Pc = price of the consol
C = yearly interest payment
ic = yield to maturity of the consol
Discount Bond
For any one year discount bond
F-P
i=
P
F = Face value of the discount bond
P = current price of the discount bond
The yield to maturity equals the increase
in price over the year divided by the initial price.
As with a coupon bond, the yield to maturity is
negatively related to the current bond price.
46
Rate of Return
The payments to the owner plus the change in value
expressed as a fraction of the purchase price
Pt +1 - Pt
C
RET =
+
Pt
Pt
RET = return from holding the bond from time t to time t + 1
Pt = price of bond at time t
Pt +1 = price of the bond at time t + 1
C = coupon payment
C
= current yield = ic
Pt
Pt +1 - Pt
= rate of capital gain = g
Pt
47
48
49
50
51
Interest-Rate Risk
Prices and returns for long-term bonds are more volatile than
those for shorter-term bonds
There is no interest-rate risk for any bond whose time to
maturity matches the holding period
52
Example
53
54
55
Preferred stock
- Fixed dividends - limited
- Priority over common
- Tax treatment
56
Div1
P1
P0 =
+
(1 + ke ) (1 + ke )
P0 = the current price of the stock
Div1 = the dividend paid at the end of year 1
ke = the required return on investment in equity
P1 = the sale price of the stock at the end of the first period
57
The value of stock today is the present value of all future cash flows
Dn
Pn
D1
D2
+
+ ... +
+
P0 =
n
1
2
(1 + ke ) (1 + ke )
(1 + ke ) (1 + ke )n
If Pn is far in the future, it will not affect P0
Dt
P0 =
t
(1
+
k
)
t =1
e
The price of the stock is determined only by the present value of
the future dividend stream
58
59
P0 =
D0 (1+ g)
D1
=
(ke g) (ke g)
60
Rate of Return
The payments to the owner plus the change in value
expressed as a fraction of the purchase price
P - Pt
C
+ t +1
RET =
Pt
Pt
RET = return from holding the bond from time t to time t + 1
Pt = price of bond at time t
Pt +1 = price of the bond at time t + 1
C = coupon payment
C
= current yield = ic
Pt
Pt +1 - Pt
= rate of capital gain = g
Pt
61
62
64
65
66
67
Money savers
1.
2.
3.
4.
Households
Companies
Government
Central Bank
Financial Markets
Money Markets
Debt Markets
Equities Markets
Money spenders
1.
2.
3.
Companies
Government
Households
Direct Finance
68
Financial Intermediaries
Over the past several decades, the non-bank financial institutions have become
important players in financing business.
69
70
71
Moral Hazard:
After transaction occurs
Hazard that borrower has incentives to engage in undesirable (immoral) activities
making it more likely that wont pay loan back
Example:
72
1
0,5
80,000
200,000
2
0,5
180,000
40,000
Total value
130,000
120,000
Both projects require an investment of 90,000 EUR in t=0. To keep things simple, assume that all people are risk
neutral and the risk-free interest rate is 0. The problem here is that of assymetrical information and incentives to
hurt the other party. Potential providers of capital cannot observe and therefore not enforce by legal means
which project the enterprenuer finally implements. But they are clevel enough to understand that they are
exposed to the danger of moral hazard.
a) Which project should/would the enterprenuer undertake if he were to provide all of the require funding by
herself or if she could effectively commit herself to invest in the project which she promises to others.
b) Now assume that the entreprenuer looks for a loan to fully finance her preferred investment project. The
enterprenuer does not have any money. Which repayment would a bank request to receive (and thus at the
same time: what would bet he agreed nominal interest rate on a loan of 90,000 EUR) provided that:
i) the enterprenuer/borrower can make a credible and binding commitment concerning her
investment choice
ii) the enteprenuer/borrower cannot make a credible and binding commtiment which project she
selects. Please explain why commitment is important in this specific case. What might motivate
the borrower not to select the seeminlgy efficient alternative?
73
74
Example:
Say you have 5,000 you would like to invest, and you think about investing in the stock
market. Because you have only 5,000 you can buy only a small number of shares. The
stockbroker tells you that your purchase is so small that the brokerage commission for
buying the stock you picked will be large percentage of the purchase price of shares. If
instead you decide to buy a bond, the problem is even worse. Indeed, the broker may
not be interested in your business at all, because the small size of your account does
not make spending time on it worthwhile. You are disappointed and realize that you
will not be able to use financial markets to earn a return on your hard-earned savings.
You can take some consolation, however, in fact you are not alone in being stymied by
high transaction costs. This is a fact of life of many of us: only around on-half of
American households own any securities.
75
76
Mobilization of funds and converting the unproductive and illiquid savings into the
productive investments thanks to information unavailable to private and public markets
Delegated monitoring thanks to monitoring of financing firm, the financial
intermediaries are able to ensure that the distributed funds are allocated with the aim of
its destination
Corporate control through the ability of monitoring borrowers, the financial
intermediaries allow the economy to overcome moral hazard problems and reduce the
agency costs
Risk-sharing banks, mutual funds and other financial intermediaries all provide useful
vehicle for pooling, trading and risk-diversifying leading to the shift of investors portfolios
towards more uncertain but higher return
Intertemporal risk-smoothing as long-lived institutions, they may facilitate
intergenerational risk arising from investing in the long-run projects offering relatively low
returns in the boom times and high in the slack times.
77
78
79
80
1.
2.
3.
4.
82
83
84
What do you need in order to sleep well after having invested your
money in Opania?
Would you invest there at all?
1. legal system
2. accounting standards
3. government credit (directs)
4. financial institutions (not nationalized)
5. adequate government regulation
85
86
Money savers
1.
2.
3.
4.
Households
Companies
Government
Central Bank
Financial Markets
Money Markets
Debt Markets
Equities Markets
Money spenders
1.
2.
3.
Companies
Government
Households
Direct Finance
87
89
Financial System
Indicators 1994
% of GDP
% of GDP
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
% of GDP
% of GDP
160
160
140
140
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
0
Euro area
Bank loans
Japan
Non-Japan
Asia
0
Euro a re a Unit e d
Unit e d
Kingdom S t a t e s
J a pa n
NonJ a pa n
Asia
Source: Allen, F., F.Chui and A.Maddaloni, Financial Systems in Europe, the USA and Asia,Oxford Review of Economic Policy,Vol.20(4), 2004
90
Source: Allen, F., F.Chui and A.Maddaloni, Financial Systems in Europe, the USA and Asia,Oxford Review of Economic Policy,Vol.20(4), 2004
91
Households
average 1995-2002
Source: Allen, F., F.Chui and A.Maddaloni, Financial Systems in Europe, the USA and Asia,Oxford Review of Economic Policy,Vol.20(4), 2004
92
Capital-based financial
system
93
Bank-based
Capital-based
Financial Systems
Financial Systems
?
Banks and stocks markets have independent effects on growth as they provide different financial services
(Levine and Zervos, 1998)
There may be a positive relationship between different measures of financial sector size, but the type of the
system does not seem to matter (Levine, 1999)
It would be important to better measure financial sector quality. Looking at its internal consistency might
provide an answer to this question
94
U.S.
Germany
Bank-based
Financial Systems
Japan
France
Capital-based
Financial Systems
U.K.
95
96
97
Alternative Views
Economists hold startlingly different views about the impact of finance on
long-run economic growth?
Finance promotes growth (Hamilton-Schmupeter):
banks are the happiest engines that ever were invented for creating
economic growth
Finance hurts growth (Adams):
banks have done more harm to the mortality, tranquility, and even
wealth of this nation than they have done or ever will do good
Finance follows growth (Robinson)
Finance doesnt matter (Solow growth accounting):
growth is mainly due to technological progress, leaving little role for
finance
98
Investment
Proposals
Potential
Investors
Financial Sector:
Resource Allocator
Resource
Deprivation
Investment
Failure
Bad loan
Inefficient Allocation
Production
Land
Labor
Equipment
Case
approved
Resource Acquisition/Allocation
Efficient Allocation
99
Channels to Growth
- capital accumulation, physical and human
- technological innovation
GROWTH
100
That
is to say that countries whose financial systems
perform their functions better, grow faster.
101
102
The protection of shareholders and creditors by the legal system helps explain the
patterns of corporate finance in different countries:
breadth and depth of capital markets
pace of new security issues
corporate ownership structure
dividend policy
efficiency of investment allocation
e(Private Credit | X)
Residuals
Values
Fitted
104
Efficiency in terms of our previous figure, the issue is how effectively funds flow from borrowers to
lenders so that everbodys wealth is maximized.
(a) how financial system allows risk to be shared and who bears that risk
(b) incentives to produce and use information; in particular,where the resources can
be most profitably invested.
(c) how effective is corporate governance implemented?
(d) how financial sytstem evolves over time and the role of law and politics in
determining it.
Financial Stability what is the relationship between the struture of the financial system and the
banking crises, currency crises, asset-price bubbles and crashes, contagion and financial fragility.