Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
In the past sand specimens were prepared for
laboratory model testing by using Tamping,
vibration and pluviation techniques [2, 13]. Among
these methods pluviation method is widely adopted
by various researchers because of its unique
advantage, wide range of density of sand bed can
be achieved compared to other techniques and
there is no possibility of particle breakage during
preparation of sand specimen. It is easy to prepare
the sand samples in stages, which facilitate
placement of instrumentation, such as load cells,
pressure cells or accelerometers, etc., at various
locations within the specimen during the sample
preparation process.
The method employed to prepare the reconstituted
sand specimen has to fulfill the following criteria,
as suggested by Kuerbis and Vaid [8]: 1) the
method must be able to produce loose to dense
sand beds in the unit weight range expected within
an in-situ soil deposit; 2) the sand bed must have a
uniform void ratio throughout; 3) the samples
should be well mixed without particle segregation,
regardless of particle gradation or fines content; 4)
sample preparation method should simulate the
mode of soil deposition commonly found in the
soil deposit being modeled.
LITERATURE REVIEW
For the last 4 decades air pluviation techniques
have been used to prepare large and small sand
specimens to conduct model foundation testing
[21], calibration chamber testing [6, 9], centrifuge
model tests [15, 19, 21], model tests using shaking
table [8], and triaxial tests [12, 17]. A wide range
of densities were achieved by controlling the sand
flow from hopper by using roller and deflector
[21], shutter and diffuser [18], nozzle and diffuser
[22] orifice, rigid tube and diffuser [7].
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
Present study uses portable travelling pluviator
(PTP) device, as shown in Figs.1, 2 and 3
developed by Dave and Dasaka [7] for sand bed
preparation. PTP device was designed on the basis
of simultaneous control of number of sieves, height
of fall (distance between the lowermost diffuser
sieve to the top of the sand bed) and deposition
intensity (mass of soil falling in the chamber per
unit effective area of diffuser per unit time) to
achieve a wider range of RD. This device has an
advantage of preparing large size sand specimens
for laboratory model testing.
Page 1 of 6
Cylinder
method
14.28
Can method
14.34
14.60
14.18
14.48
14.39
14.18
14.45
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Tests are performed in order to evaluate effect of
HF (varied from 2.5 cm to 30 cm), DI (using
orifice diameter of 5 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm and
12 mm), and number of diffuser sieves (varied
from 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10) on RD of pluviated
specimen. Sieves are rotated 450 horizontally with
respect to each other [18]. A cylindrical mould of
volume 3213 cm3 is used for preliminary studies on
evaluation of DI and density of sand bed. The
effect of orifice size on the DI for Grade II sand is
presented in Table 3. Observed DI increases with
increase in diameter of orifice. Lower density of
sand specimens can be achieved at higher DI,
Page 3 of 6
Page 4 of 6
REFERENCES
1. ASTM D4253-06 (2006). Standard Test
Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit
Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM Intl.,
West Conshohocken, PA.
2. ASTM D4254-00 (2006). Standard Test
Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit
Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative
Density. Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
ASTM Intl., West Conshohocken, PA.
3. Butterfield, R., and Andrawes, K. Z. (1970).
An Air Activated and Spreader for Forming
Uniform Sand bed. Geotechnique, 20(1), 97100.
4. Bolton, M. D., Gui, M. W., Garnier, J., Corte,
J. F., Bagge, G., Laue, J., and Renzi, R. (1999).
Centrifuge Cone Penetration Tests in Sand.
Geotechnique, 49(4), 543-552.
5. Cresswell, A., Barton, M. E., and Brown, R.
(1999). Determining the maximum unit
weight of sands by pluviation. Geotechnical
Testing Journal, 22(4), 324-328.
6. Choi, S.K., Lee M.J., Choo, H., Tumay, M. T.,
and Lee, W. (2010). Preparation of a Large
Size Granular Specimen Using a Rainer System
with a Porous Plate. Geotechnical Testing
Journal, 33(1), 1-10.
7. Dave, T. N. and Dasaka, S. M. (2012).
Assessment of portable traveling pluviator to
prepare reconstituted sand specimens.
Geomechanics and Engineering An
International Journal, 4(2), 79-90.
8. Dief. H. M., and Figueroa, J. L. (2003). Shake
table calibration and specimen preparation for
liquefaction studies in the centrifuge.
Geotechnical testing journal, 26(4), 1-8.
9. Fretti, C., Lo Presti, D. C. E., and Pedroni, S.
(1995). A Pluvial deposition method to
reconstitute specimens well-graded sand.
Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(2), 292-298.
Page 5 of 6
Page 6 of 6