Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Methods
Data collection
We collected moss species inventories of political or
regional units worldwide (hereafter geographical
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Source
Ochyra et al., 2008
Matteri, 2003
Klazenga et al., 2009
Kockinger et al., 2008
OShea, 2003a
Sotiaux et al., 2007b
Long, 1994
Churchill et al., 2009
Forzza et al., 2010
Ireland et al., 1987
Delgadillo et al., 1995
Geffert et al.
Taxonomic standardization
Because the data were derived from diverse sources,
the quality of individual lists varied with age, scope,
and taxonomic concept of the original publication.
Older checklists listed outdated taxon names and
occasionally several synonymous names at a time.
Checklists varied in the way they were compiled (see
review of liverwort checklists in Soderstrom et al.,
2008), being based on literature records, verified
specimens, or field collections. Finally, different
authors adhered to different taxonomic concepts,
splitting or lumping different taxa, potentially compromising the comparability of species lists from
different sources by inflating or deflating species
numbers, and thus distorting observed patterns (as
was shown by Isaac et al., 2004).
We therefore deemed it important to standardize
our dataset using a reference species list. The
TROPICOS database of Missouri Botanical Garden
proved to be a unique resource for this purpose. This
database is freely available, continuously updated, and
includes the data of the Crosby et al. (1999) world
checklist of mosses (see Magill, 2010 for an in-depth
discussion). It has been frequently used as the standard
reference in the past and became the sole input for
mosses into The Plant List, the working list of all
known plant species (Royal Botanic Gardens Kew,
2010).
We linked our dataset to TROPICOS and extracted
further information on each given taxon in an
automated procedure: first, we used the automated
name matching tool of the TROPICOS website (http://
www.tropicos.org/NameMatching.aspx) to obtain the
unique identification number of each taxon used by the
TROPICOS data base system. This identification
number enabled us to access more detailed information
with R statistical software (R Development Core Team,
2011). The basic mechanism is to generate a specific web
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Figure 1 Documented patterns of global species richness in mosses based on national and regional checklists. Numbers
include all taxa listed as legitimate or no opinion by TROPICOS, but exclude illegitimate and invalid names that could not
be resolved.
Figure 2 Patterns of global species richness in mosses. Species numbers have been standardized for an area of 100 000 km2
using the species area model of Arrhenius (1921).
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Figure 3 Major orders of mosses for the main floristic kingdoms. The size of the pie charts indicates the total species richness
for the respective region. Global plot shown in the bottom left and regional plots for floristic kingdoms shown in the map.
Delineation of floristic kingdoms was adopted from Olson et al. (2001), but modified by merging Nearctic and Palaearctic regions.
Results
Species inventories and taxonomic
standardization
Inventory data covering the entire continental global
land surface were collected from a total of 55 national
and regional checklists, floras, and online databases
(listed in Table 1) on over 400 GUs. The final dataset
had over 100 000 records of moss species occurring in
a particular GU.
Of the original 14 804 species in the dataset, 13 371
were automatically matched to a TROPICOS entry as
our taxonomic reference list, 1362 species had to be
manually corrected because of typing errors, aberrant
authority abbreviations and superfluous or missing
hyphens, and 71 names could not be referenced to a
TROPICOS entry and were thus omitted in the further
analysis.
With the taxonomic standardization, 2327 species
names were reassigned to a new taxon name and the
total number of species in our dataset was reduced to
11 388 species. Of these, the vast majority (9272) were
listed as legitimate in TROPICOS. No current
opinion was available for 1925 taxa, while 173 names
were listed as invalid and 18 as illegitimate with no
accepted name to reassign them to.
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Figure 4 Patterns of species richness for the major subgroups of mosses. Species numbers as species per region, not
standardized by area. Classification based on TROPICOS and the Syllabus of plant families. Part 3: Bryophytes and seedless
vascular plants (Frey et al., 2009).
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Figure 4b
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Discussion
The data presented here give a much more detailed
picture of the global distribution of moss species
richness than any comparable prior analysis.
The fact that mosses occur in high numbers from
polar to tropical regions illustrates their high adaptability to different environmental conditions. The low
species richness in many dry-land regions, however,
demonstrates their high dependence on freely available water in the form of precipitation or cloud
moisture. Only a few specialized taxa manage to
reduce this dependence on moisture and are thus able
to survive in dry-land areas (Frahm, 2001).
The use of data derived from checklists and floras
is not without problems (Kreft et al., 2010), but
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this dataset had been established
with the help of Holger Kreft. Boon Chuan Ho,
Daud Rafiqpoor, Dietmar Quandt, and Eberhard
Fischer provided valuable assistance in obtaining
checklist publications. We thank these colleagues and
three anonymous reviewers as well for valuable
comments on this study. Parts of our work were
References
Arrhenius, O. 1921. Species and area. Journal of Ecology, 9: 959.
Balmford, A., Crane, P., Dobson, A.J., Green, R.E. & Mace, G.M.
2005. The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs
and extraterrestrial insights. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 306: 2218.
Barnosky, A.D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G.O.U., Swartz,
B., Quental, T.B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J.L., Lindsey, E.L.,
Maguire, K.C., Mersey, B. & Mersey, E.A. 2011. Has the Earths
sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471: 517.
Barthlott, W., Biedinger, N., Braun, G., Feig, F., Kier, G. & Mutke,
J. 1999. Terminological and methodological aspects of the
mapping and analysis of the global biodiversity. Acta Botanica
Fennica, 162: 10310.
Barthlott, W., Hoestert, A., Kier, G., Kuper, W., Kreft, H., Mutke,
J., Rafiqpoor, D. & Sommer, J.H. 2007. Geographic patterns of
vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales.
Erdkunde, 61: 30516.
Barthlott, W., Lauer, W. & Placke, A. 1996. Global distribution of
species diversity in vascular plants: towards a world map of
phytodiversity. Erdkunde, 50: 31728.
Bates, J.W. & Farmer, A.M. eds. 1992. Bryophytes and lichens in a
changing environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bebber, D.P., Marriott, F.H.C., Gaston, K.J., Harris, S.A. &
Scotland, R.W. 2007. Predicting unknown species numbers
using discovery curves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274:
16518.
Boggan, J., Funk, V., Kelloff, C., Hoff, M., Cremers, G. & Feuillet,
C. 1997. Checklist of the plants of the Guianas. Washington,
DC: Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural
History, Smithsonian Institution.
Carvalho, G.H., Cianciaruso, M.V. & Batalha, M.A. 2010.
Plantminer: a web tool for checking and gathering plant
species taxonomic information. Environmental Modelling &
Software, 25: 8156.
Chapin, F.S., Oechel, W.C., van Cleve, K. & Lawrence, W. 1987.
The role of mosses in the phosphorous cycling of an Alaskan
black spruce forest. Oecologia, 74: 3105.
Chiang, T.-Y., Hsu, T.-W., Moore, S.-J. & Tan, B.C. 2001. Updated
checklist of Taiwan mosses. Nantou: The Biological Society of
China.
Churchill, S.P. 2009. Moss diversity and endemism of the tropical
Andes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 96: 43449.
Churchill, S.P., Ninel, N., Sanjines, A. & Aldana, C. 2009. Catalogo
de las briofitas de Bolivia: diversidad, distribucion y ecologa.
Santa Cruz: Missouri Botanical Garden & Museo de Historia
Natural.
Costa, D.P., Camara, P.E.A.S., Porto, K.C., Luizi-Ponzo, A.P. &
Ilkiu-Borges, A.L. 2010. Musgos. In: Lista de especies da flora
do Brasil. Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro [online] [accessed
5 January 2011]. Available at: ,http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/
2010/FB000010.
Crosby, M.R., Magill, R.E., Allen, B. & He, S. 1999. A checklist of
the mosses. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden.
Davis, F.W., Storms, D.M., Estes, J.E., Scepan, J. & Michael, S.J.
1990. An information systems approach to the preservation of
biological diversity. International Journal of Geographical
Information Science, 4: 5578.
de Lucia, E.H., Turnbull, M.H., Walcroft, A.S., Griffin, K.L.,
Tissue, D.T., Glenny, D., McSeveny, T.M. & Whitehead, D.
2003. The contribution of bryophytes to the carbon exchange
for a temperate rainforest. Global Change Biology, 9: 115870.
Delgadillo, C., Bello, B. & Cardenas, A. 1995. Latmoss: A catalogue
of neotropical mosses. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden
[online] [accessed 2 March 2009]. Available at: ,http://
www.mobot.org/MOBOT/tropicos/most/latmoss.shtml.
Erzberger, P. & Papp, B. 2004. Annotated checklist of Hungarian
bryophytes. Studia Botanica Hungarica, 35: 91149.
ESRI. 2009. ArcMap 9.2. Redlands, CA: ESRI (Environmental
Systems Resource Institute).
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
10
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
Geffert et al.
Tan, B.C. & Iwatsuki, Z. 1996. Hot spots of mosses in East Asia.
Anales del Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional
Autonoma de Mexico, Serie Botanica, 67: 15967.
Tan, B.C. & Pocs, T. 2000. Bryogeography and conservation of
bryophytes. In: A.J. Shaw, & B. Goffinet, eds. Bryophyte
biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40348.
Tan, B.C. & Soon, C.K. 1997. Malesian Moss Database [accessed 5
March 2010]. Available at: ,http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/sinu/mal_
moss/mal_moss_index.html.
The New York Botanical Garden. 2003. American Bryophyte
Catalog. New York Botanical Gardens Virtual Herbarium
[accessed 26 January 2010]. Available at: ,http://sciweb.nybg.
org/science2/hcol/bryo/index.asp.
Tsegmed, T. 2001. Checklist and distribution of mosses in
Mongolia. Arctoa, 10: 118.
Turetsky, M.R. 2003. The role of bryophytes in carbon and
nitrogen cycling. Bryologist, 106: 395409.
Villarreal, J.C., Cargill, D.C., Hagborg, A., Soderstrom, L. &
Renzaglia, K.S. 2010. A synthesis of hornwort diversity:
patterns, causes and future work. Phytotaxa, 9: 15166.
Vitt, D.H. & Wieder, R.K. 2008. The structure and function of
bryophyte-dominated peatlands. In: B. Goffinet & A.J. Shaw
eds. Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 35792.
von Konrat, M., Hagborg, A., Soderstrom, L., Mutke, J., Renner,
M., Gradstein, S.R., Engel, J., Zhu, R.-L. & Pickering, J. 2008.
Early land plants today: global patterns of liverwort diversity,
distribution and floristic knowledge. In: H.B.B. Mohamed, A.
Baki, A. Nasrulhaq-Boyce & P.K.Y. Lee, eds. Bryology in the
new Millennium. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, pp.
42538.
von Konrat, M., Soderstrom, L. & Hagborg, A. 2010. The Early
Land Plants Today project (ELPT): a community-driven effort
and a new partnership with Phytotaxa. Phytotaxa, 9: 1121.
Werner, J. 2008. Checklist and Red List of the bryophytes of
Luxembourg [accessed 5 March 2009]. Available at: ,http://
www.mnhn.lu/colsci/weje/pdf/checkliste.pdf.
Yano, O. 1981. A checklist of Brazilian mosses. Journal of the
Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 50: 279456.
Zander, R. 2010. Personal communication to Jan Laurens Geffert,
5 November 2010.
Ziemmeck, F. & Gradstein, S.R. 2009. List of all known species from
the Galapagos Islands [accessed 5 March 2009]. Available at:
,http://checklists.datazone.darwinfoundation.org.
Journal of Bryology
2013
VOL .
35
NO .
11