Performance appraisal policy

In this file, you can ref useful information about performance appraisal policy such as
performance appraisal policymethods, performance appraisal policy tips, performance appraisal
policyforms, performance appraisal policy phrases If you need more assistant for performance
appraisal policy, please leave your comment at the end of file.
Other useful material for you:
performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases
performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms
performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal

I. Contents of getting performance appraisal policy

==================
Performance evaluations are one component of a workplace policy referred to as a performance
management system. Performance management is the process that employers use for measuring
how well employees perform their job tasks. A performance management system typically
consists of a job description, performance standards, informal feedback, disciplinary procedures
and a formal evaluation. While it's not required for employers to have a formal performance
evaluation process, HR best practices suggest them, particularly for justifying employment
decisions.
Performance Standards
Job descriptions and performance standards are fundamental to a performance evaluation policy.
A job description contains the essential functions of a job and provides the employee with
guidelines for her responsibilities. Performance standards tell the employee how she must
perform her job functions to meet the employer's expectations. For example, to meet her
employer's performance expectations, a sales representative might be required to achieve $3,000
monthly sales of office equipment and gain two new customers every quarter. However, if she
maintains monthly sales of $5,000 for six months and gains three new customers every quarter,
she has exceeded her employer's expectations.
Introductory Performance Evaluation
Many employers evaluate performance when an employee completes his first 90 days on the job.
This first evaluation is to determine whether the employee understands his role and actually has
the skill set and qualifications to perform his job duties. If the employee's initial performance
evaluation reflects substandard work, the company can offer remedial training or pair him with

an experienced employee for further orientation on company or department work processes.

Employers that don't offer additional training may reconsider whether to keep the employee
onboard or give him another opportunity to improve his performance.
Supervisor Preparation
When a supervisor prepares for an employee's annual performance evaluation, he reviews the
employee's job performance for the entire evaluation period -- 12 months -- and substantiates his
ratings with progress reports, disciplinary action memos, commendations, attendance records and
informal feedback on the employee's performance from other managers, employees or
customers. Depending on the type of performance evaluation, preparation could take two to three
weeks. Supervisors might review the employee's personnel file or consult other supervisors or
managers with whom the employee may have worked during the 12-month period.
Types of Evaluations
The simplest evaluations use numerical ratings for categories of job functions. These are graphic
rating scales, and they are suitable for production work environments where employees'
performance can be easily measured using a scale of 1 to 5 in areas such as attendance,
reliability, accuracy and teamwork. At the other end of the spectrum are more complex forms of
performance evaluations, such as management by objectives, or MBO. Performance evaluations
might also include narratives that require supervisors to construct essays about employees' work.
Evaluations known as "forced ranking" were popularized by former CEO of GE, Jack Welch.
Forced ranking entails classifying workers into three groups: 20 percent as high-performing
employees, 70 percent as average performers and 10 percent of the employee base as lowperforming employees.
Evaluation Meeting
The final stage in many performance evaluation procedures is the face-to-face meeting that
supervisors have with their employees to discuss their ratings. The meeting is intended to foster
two-way supervisor-employee dialogue and prepare the employee for the next evaluation period
through goal-setting and correcting existing performance deficiencies. In addition, many
employers tie performance evaluation to salary or wage increases and use the ratings to
determine the percent by which to raise the employee's compensation.
==================

III. Performance appraisal methods

1. Essay Method

In this method the rater writes down the employee

description in detail within a number of broad categories
like, overall impression of performance, promoteability
of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of
performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training
needs of the employee. Advantage It is extremely
useful in filing information gaps about the employees
that often occur in a better-structured checklist.
Disadvantages It its highly dependent upon the writing
skills of rater and most of them are not good writers.
They may get confused success depends on the memory
power of raters.

2. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales

statements of effective and ineffective behaviors
determine the points. They are said to be
behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to
say, which behavior describes the employee
performance. Advantages helps overcome rating
errors. Disadvantages Suffers from distortions
inherent in most rating techniques.

3. Rating Scale
Rating scales consists of several numerical scales
representing job related performance criterions such as
dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc.
Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total
numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are
derived. Advantages Adaptability, easy to use, low cost,
every type of job can be evaluated, large number of
employees covered, no formal training required.
Disadvantages Raters biases

4. Checklist method
Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of
employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is
prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation.
Advantages economy, ease of administration, limited
training required, standardization. Disadvantages Raters
biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow
rater to give relative ratings

5.Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his
subordinates on overall performance. This consists in
simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method,
the ranking of an employee in a work group is done
against that of another employee. The relative position of
each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It
may also be done by ranking a person on his job
performance against another member of the competitive
group.
Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their
performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst
employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The whole man is compared with another
whole man in this method. In practice, it is very difficult
to compare individuals possessing various individual
traits.

This method speaks only of the position where an

employee stands in his group. It does not test anything
about how much better or how much worse an employee
is when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working,
ranking of individuals become a difficult issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking
individuals in the organization. The ranking system does
not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.

6. Critical Incidents Method

The approach is focused on certain critical behaviors of
employee that makes all the difference in the
performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record
such incidents. Advantages Evaluations are based on
actual job behaviors, ratings are supported by
descriptions, feedback is easy, reduces recency biases,
chances of subordinate improvement are high.
Disadvantages Negative incidents can be prioritized,
forgetting incidents, overly close supervision; feedback
may be too much and may appear to be punishment.

III. Other topics related to Performance appraisal policy (pdf,

doc file download)
Top 28 performance appraisal forms
performance appraisal comments
11 performance appraisal methods
25 performance appraisal examples
performance appraisal phrases
performance appraisal process
performance appraisal template
performance appraisal system
performance appraisal answers

performance appraisal questions

performance appraisal techniques
performance appraisal format
performance appraisal templates
performance appraisal questionnaire
performance appraisal software
performance appraisal tools
performance appraisal interview
performance appraisal phrases examples
performance appraisal objectives
performance appraisal policy
performance appraisal letter
performance appraisal types
performance appraisal quotes
performance appraisal articles