No

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42

Year
1960
1961
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2011

RF
Desending
79.1
100
54
90
90
79.1
100
65.8
47
65.7
30
65.6
38
60.6
47
60.5
51.2
59.2
40.7
56.2
50
55.5
42.5
55.4
40.1
55.2
55.2
54.9
60.6
54
59.2
53.4
38.3
51.2
33
50.5
38.3
50
31
47
28.6
47
44.4
44.5
55.5
44.4
37.5
42.5
35.4
41.3
41.3
40.9
60.5
40.7
50.5
40.5
65.7
40.1
65.6
39.2
40.5
38.6
56.2
38.3
40.9
38.3
65.8
38
38.6
37.5
39.2
36.8
4.2
35.4
54.9
33
44.5
31
53.4
30
55.4
28.6
36.8
4.2

Desending
100
90
79.1
65.8
65.7
65.6
60.6
60.5
59.2
56.2
55.5
55.4
55.2
54.9
54
53.4
51.2
50.5
50
47
47
44.5
44.4
42.5
41.3
40.9
40.7
40.5
40.1
39.2
38.6
38.3
38.3
38
37.5
36.8
35.4
33
31
30
28.6
4.2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Year
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

Jan
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Feb
0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
7.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Mar
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
###
0.0
###
###
###
###
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
###
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Apr
11.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.2
33.4
0.0
2.8
72.0
30.2
13.7
0.0
64.1
13.9
6.7
0.0
52.1
0.0
30.9
0.0
61.7
0.0
0.0
0.0

May
112.7
34.5
31.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.5
0.0
88.0
110.1
203.9
54.1
44.1
35.3
196.8
3.5
0.0
18.8
63.4
112.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
58.5

Average

1.1

0.8

7.8

15.9

49.3

Year
1987
1988
1989
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001

Jan
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.5
0.0
0.0

Feb
0.0
7.9
0.0
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Mar
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
###
0.0
###
###
###
###
0.0
0.0
0.0

Apr
11.6
0.0
0.0
4.2
33.4
0.0
2.8
72.0
30.2
13.7
0.0
64.1
13.9

May
112.7
34.5
31.2
0.0
66.5
0.0
88.0
110.1
203.9
54.1
44.1
35.3
196.8

Jun
64.2
160.3
238.6
0.0
0.0
55.9
132.9
226.3
130.1
316.9
138.8
286.5
283.2
307.7
149.7
238.5
0.0
173.2
176.6
168.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
44.3

Jul
129.7
357.4
277.1
0.0
0.0
155.3
124.8
333.6
283.8
409.6
282.4
368.0
213.1
300.1
306.2
252.6
0.0
302.7
0.0
256.0
387.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
268.0

Aug
208.7
283.9
200.6
0.0
0.0
308.2
230.2
281.2
225.0
322.0
142.7
186.4
201.3
181.0
369.1
0.0
0.0
237.6
90.8
297.5
300.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
240.1

131.7 200.3 172.3

Jun
64.2
160.3
238.6
55.9
132.9
226.3
130.1
316.9
138.8
286.5
283.2
307.7
149.7

Jul
129.7
357.4
277.1
155.3
124.8
333.6
283.8
409.6
282.4
368.0
213.1
300.1
306.2

Aug
208.7
283.9
200.6
308.2
230.2
281.2
225.0
322.0
142.7
186.4
201.3
181.0
369.1

15
16
17
18
19
20

2002
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2011

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
0.0

3.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

3.5
0.0
###
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

6.7
52.1
0.0
30.9
0.0
61.7
0.0

3.5
18.8
63.4
112.3
0.0
0.0
58.5

Average

1.2

0.6

9.8

19.9

61.7

Month
jan
feb
mar
apr
may
jun
jul
aug
sep
oct
nov
dec
Annual
RF (MM)
Month
Mean

238.5
173.2
176.6
168.6
0.0
0.0
44.3

300.0
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0

903.85
Feb
0.65

Mar
9.76

Apr
19.87

May
61.69

0.0
237.6
90.8
297.5
300.8
0.0
240.1

164.6 250.4 215.4

Desendin Rank Probability Return Period

MRF(MeanMRF(Mea m P=m/(1+N) T=(N+1)/m
1.2 250.415 1
13.00
0.08
0.645 215.355 2
6.50
0.15
9.755 164.615 3
4.33
0.23
19.865 103.275 4
3.25
0.31
61.685
63.83 5
2.60
0.38
164.615 61.685 6
2.17
0.46
250.415 19.865 7
1.86
0.54
215.355
11.41 8
1.63
0.62
103.275
9.755 9
1.44
0.69
63.83
1.825 10
1.30
0.77
11.41
1.175 11
1.18
0.85
1.825
0.645 12
1.08
0.92
N= 12

Jan
1.18

252.6
302.7
0.0
256.0
387.9
0.0
268.0

M e a n m o n th ly RF(m m )

14

Jun
164.62

jan

feb

Jul
Aug
250.42 215.36

mar

apr

Sep
0.0
103.9
46.4
0.0
0.0
86.0
116.4
175.1
89.5
286.8
99.7
91.8
50.4
83.9
151.1
141.6
0.0
114.1
0.0
189.5
124.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
114.7
82.6

Sep
0.0
103.9
46.4
86.0
116.4
175.1
89.5
286.8
99.7
91.8
50.4
83.9
151.1

Oct
60.6
68.6
40.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
17.6
0.0
22.6
0.0
###
29.1
###
###
1.4
30.0
0.0
58.7
0.0
93.0
40.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Nov Dec Total

34.6 0.0 622.1
0.0 0.0 1017.1
0.0 0.0 834.8
0.0 0.0
4.8
0.0 0.0
0.0
4.0 0.0 613.6
25.2 0.0 764.9
11.7 0.0 1027.9
0.0 0.0 856.6
30.7 0.0 1601.3
91.0 5.3 1449.1
0.0 0.0 1064.5
0.0 5.2 1029.7
18.2 0.0 1152.0
4.2 ### 1202.7
0.0 0.0 679.4
0.0 0.0
7.0
8.6 2.5 969.0
0.0 0.0 376.3
0.0 ### 1161.0
0.0 0.0 853.7
0.0 0.0 75.7
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 725.6
51.1 9.1 1.5 723.6

Oct
60.6
68.6
40.9
0.0
17.6
0.0
22.6
0.0
###
29.1
###
###
1.4

Nov Dec Total

34.6 0.0 622.1
0.0 0.0 1017.1
0.0 0.0 834.8
4.0 0.0 613.6
25.2 0.0 764.9
11.7 0.0 1027.9
0.0 0.0 856.6
30.7 0.0 1601.3
91.0 5.3 1449.1
0.0 0.0 1064.5
0.0 5.2 1029.7
18.2 0.0 1152.0
4.2 ### 1202.7

0.0 0.0 679.4

8.6 2.5 969.0
0.0 0.0 376.3
0.0 ### 1161.0
0.0 0.0 853.7
0.0 0.0 75.7
0.0 0.0 725.6
103.3 63.8 11.4 1.8 903.9

141.6
114.1
0.0
189.5
124.6
0.0
114.7

30.0
58.7
0.0
93.0
40.4
0.0
0.0

MRF(Mean)

jan

feb

mar

apr

may

jun

Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
103.28 63.83 11.41 1.83

Month
jul

Total
903.85

aug

sep

oct

nov

dec

Table 5-8 Runoff Curve Numbers- Urban Areas1

Cover description

Curve numbers for hydrologic soil groups

Cover type and Hydrologic

condition

Average %
impervious area2

Poor condition (grass cover

<50%)

68

79

86

89

Fair condition (grass cover 50

% to 75%)

49

69

79

84

Good condition (grass cover

>75%)

39

61

74

80

98

98

98

98

Gravel (including right-of-way)

98

98

98

98

Dirt (including right-of-way)

83

89

92

93

Desert urban areas:

76

85

89

91

Natural desert cover

72

82

87

89

63

77

85

88

85

89

92

94

95

72

81

88

91

93

65
38

77
61

85
75

90
83

92
87

0.135 hectare

30

57

72

81

86

0.2 hectare

25

54

70

80

85

0.4 hectare

20

51

68

79

84

0.8 hectare

12

46

65

77

82

77

86

91

94

Open space (lawns, parks,

cemeteries, etc.)3

Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs,
driveways, etc. (excluding right-ofway)
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm drains
(excluding right-of-way)
Paved; open ditches (including
right-of-way)

Urban districts:
Commercial and business
Industrial

Residential districts by average

plot
size:
0.05
hectare or less
0.1 hectare

Developing urban areas

Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no
vegetation)

Average runoff condition, and Ia = 0.2S

pervious areas are considered equivalent
to open space in good hydrologic condition. If the impervious area is not
connected,
the SCS method has an adjustment to reduce the effect.
3
CNs shown are equivalent to those of pasture. Composite CNs may be computed for other combinations of open
space cover type.
1

Table 5-9 Cultivated Agricultural Land1

Cover description
Cover Type

Hydrologic
condtion3

Bare soil

77

86

91

94

Poor

76

85

90

93

Good

74

83

88

90

Straight row
(SR)

Poor

72

81

88

91

Good

67

78

85

89

SR + CR

Poor

71

80

87

90

Good

64

75

82

85

Contoured (C)

Poor
Good

70
65

79
75

84
82

88
86

C + CR

Poor

69

78

83

87

Good

64

74

81

85

Contoured &
Poor
terraced (C & T) Good

66

74

80

82

62

71

78

81

C&T + CR

Poor

65

73

79

81

Good

61

70

77

80

Poor

65

76

84

88

Good

63

75

83

87

Poor

64

75

83

86

Good

60

72

80

84

Poor

63

74

82

85

Good

61

73

81

84

Poor

62

73

81

84

Good

60

72

80

83

Poor

61

72

79

82

Good

59

70

78

81

Poor
Good

60
58

71
69

78
77

81
80

Poor

66

77

85

89

Good

58

72

81

85

Poor
Good

64
55

75
69

83
78

85
83

Poor

63

73

80

83

Crop residue
cover (CR)

Fallow

Row Crops

Small grain SR
SR + CR
C
Small Grain

Curve numbers for Hydrologic soil group

Treatment2

C + CR
C&T
C&T + CR

SR
Close-seeded SR or broadcast
legumes or rotation meadow

C
C&T

Close-seeded SR or broadcast
legumes or rotation meadow
C&T

Good

51

Average runoff condition, and Ia = 0.2S.

Crop residue cover applies only if residue is on at least 5% of the surface throughout the year.

67

76

80

Hydrologic condition is based on a combination of factors that affect infiltration and runoff, including (a) density and canopy of vegetative areas, (b)
amount of year-round cover, (c) amount of grass or closed-seeded legumes in rotations, (d) percent of residue cover on the land surface (good >
Poor
: Factors impair/Diminishi infiltration and tend to increase runoff.
3

Good

: Factors encourage average and better than average infiltration and tend to decrease runoff.

Table 5-10 Other Agricultural Lands1

Cover description

Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group

Cover type

Hydrologic
condition

Pasture, grassland, or rangecontinuous forage for grazing2

Poor
Fair
Good
--

68
49
39
35

79
69
61
59

86
79
74
72

89
84
80
79

Poor
Fair
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
--

48
35
30
57
43
32
45
36
30
59

67
56
48
73
65
58
66
60
55
74

77
70
65
82
76
72
77
73
70
82

83
77
73
86
82
79
83
79
77
86

Meadow-continuous grass,
protected from grazing
Brush-weed-grass mixture with
brush the major element3
Woods-grass combination5

Woods6

Farmsbuildings, lanes,
driveways, and surrounding lots
1

Average runoff condition, and Ia = 0.2S

Poor: < 50% ground cover or heavily grazed with no mulch

Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover and not heavily grazed
Good: > 75% ground cover and lightly or only occasionally grazed

Poor: < 50% ground cover

Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover
Good: > 75% ground cover

Actual curve number is less than 30; use CN = 30 for runoff computations.

CNs shown were computed for areas with 50% grass (pasture) cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from
CNs for woods and pasture.
Poor :Forest litter, small trees, and brush are destroyed by heavy grazing or regular burning.
5
6

Fair: Woods grazed but not burned, and some forest litter covers the soil.
Good: Woods protected from grazing, litter and brush adequately cover soil.

Table 5-11 Arid and Semiarid Rangelands

Cover description
Cover type

Curve numbers for hydrologic soil group

Hydrologic
condition2

Mixture of grass, weeds, and low- Poor

growing brush, with brush the
Fair
minor element

A3

80
71

87
81

93
89

Mixture of grass, weeds, and lowgrowing brush, with brush the

minor element

Good

62

74

85

Mountain brush mixture of small

trees and brush

Poor
Fair
Good

66
48
30

74
57
41

79
63
48

Small trees with grass understory

Poor
Fair
Good

75
58
41

85
73
61

89
80
71

Brush with grass understory

Poor
Fair
Good

67
51
35

80
63
47

85
70
55

Desert shrub brush

Poor
Fair
Good

77
72
68

85
81
79

88
86
84

63
55
49

Average runoff condition, and Ia = 0.2S

Poor : < 30 % ground cover (litter, grass, and brush overstory)

Fair : 30 to 70 % ground cover
Good: > 70 % ground cover

Curve numbers for Group A have been developed only for desert shrub

Table 5-12 Conversion from Average Antecedent Moisture

CNs For
to Dry Corresponding
and Wet Conditions

CN For AverageConditions
Conditions
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
15
5

Dry
100
87
78
70
63
57
51
45
40
35
31
26
22
18
15
12
6
2

Wet
100
98
96
94
91
88
85
82
78
74
70
65
60
55
50
43
30
13

Ethiopian Rainfall Region D1 (< 100 mm)

Ethiopian Rainfall Region A2 & B1 (mean monthly Peak > 300 mm)

Source:

Table 5-13 Rainfall Groups for Antecedent Soil Moisture

Conditions During Growing and Dormant Seasons

Ref. 15

Antecedent Condition

Dry
Average
Wet

Conditions Description

Growing
Dormant
Season Five- Season FiveDay
Day
Antecedent Antecedent
Rainfall
Rainfall

An optimum Condition of
Less than 36 Less than 13
catchment area soils, where soils
mm
mm
are dry but not to the wilting point,
The average case for annual
36 to 53 mm 13 to 28 mm
floods
When a heavy
rainfall, or light
Over 53 mm Over 28 mm
rainfall and low temperatures,

Soil Types
Calcaric Fluvisols

Hydrologic
Soil Group
B

Calcaric Regosols
Calcic Cambisols

A
B

Calcic Chernozems

Caloic Xerosols

Cambric Arenosols

Chromic Cambisols
Chromic Luvisols

B
B

Chromic Vertisols
Dystric Cambisols

D
B

Dystric Histosols

Dystric Nitosols
Eutric Cambisols
Eutric Fluvisols
Eutric Histosols
Eutric Nitosols
Eutric Regosols
Gleyic Solonchaks
Gypsic Yermosols
Haplic Phaeozems
Haplic Xerosols
Humic Andosols
Humic Cambisols
Lithosols
Luvic Phaeozems
Luvic Xerosols
Mollic Andosols
Orthic Acrisols
Orthic Luvisols
Orthic Solonchaks
Pellic Vertisols

B
B
B
D
B
A
D
B
C
B
B
C
D
C
C
B
B
B
B
D

Rendzinas
Vertic Cambisols
Vertic Luvisols
Vitric Andosols
Eutric Vertisols
Haplic Luvisols
Lithic Leptosols

Water
Humic Nitosols
Rendzic Leptosols
Haplic Nitosols

Eutric Leptosols
Haplic Alisols

D
B
C
B
D
B
B
D
B
B
B
B
A

FROM GIS CATCHMENT LAND USE LAND COVER AN

Shape_Area

BasinSlope

LC1

LC1LU_D LC1_MA SOIL_T

ES
SDES
YPE

25368585.028397
Cultivated
4.1147119Land;
CRCL
Rainfed;
Cultivation
Cereal Land
Chromic
Cover
Vertisols
System; ligh
1318117.336278
Cultivated
3.5535445Land;
CRCL
Rainfed;
Cultivation
Cereal Land
Eutric
Cover
Fluvisols
System; ligh
188364.397828
Cultivated
4.325742 Land;
CRCL
Rainfed;
Cultivation
Cereal Land
Chromic
Cover
Luvisols
System; ligh
1550138.890456 Cultivated
4.4055845
Land; CRCB
Rainfed;
Cultivation
Cereal Land Cover
Orthic System;
Luvisols unstoc
8353.604607
Cultivated
3.466277
Land; CRCB
Rainfed;
Cultivation
Cereal LandEutric
CoverCambisols
System; unstoc
2568531.180864
4.0367396
GB
Grassland;
Grassland
unstocked
Chromic
(woody
Vertisols
plant)
363764.533444
3.5826337
GB
Grassland;
Grassland
unstocked
Eutric
(woody
Fluvisols
plant)
234739.379711
4.157685
GB
Grassland;
Grassland
unstocked
Orthic
(woody
Luvisols
plant)
78376.444114
3.466277
SHO
Shrubland;
Shrubland
Open (20-50%
Eutricwoody
Fluvisols
cover)
121052.901145
4.6873572
SHO
Shrubland;
Shrubland
Open (20-50%
Chromic
woody
Vertisols
cover)
213217.097748
3.1286292
HSS
Wetland;
Wetland
Seasonal
Chromic
SwampVertisols
/ Marsh
32013240.794592
m2
32.0132407946
Km2

D USE LAND COVER AND SOIL(ARANGED)

MAJOR MINOR
_SOIL
_SOIL
VertisolsChromic
Fluvisols Eutric
LuvisolsChromic
Luvisols Orthic
CambisolsEutric
VertisolsChromic
Fluvisols Eutric
Luvisols Orthic
Fluvisols Eutric
VertisolsChromic
VertisolsChromic

Hydrology soil Group

High runoff
D
potential
Moderet
B
Inflitration
Moderet
B
Inflitration
Moderet
B
Inflitration
Moderet
Inflitration
B
High runoff
potential
D
Moderet
Inflitration
B
Moderet
B
Inflitration
Moderet
B
Inflitration
High
runoff
D
potential
High runoff
D
potential

CN for
Hydroli Hydrol
Area
c
ogic
Reduct Conditi
soil
ion(%)
on
group
79.244
4.1174
0.5884
4.8422
0.0261
8.0233
1.1363
0.7333
0.2448
0.3781
0.666

Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor

88
84
84
84
84
86
73
73
66
83
100

CASE-1
AVERAGE
RIVER BED SLOPE
ACCUMUL
CH
0
976.95
3945
4997
7001
8003
9081
12888

ELV
2020.96
1988.935
1928.283
1893.833
1847.737
1837.548
1812.802
1788.056

PD
0
977
2968
1052
2004
1002
1078
3807

ATIVE
HEIGHT
0
32.025
60.652
34.45
46.096
10.189
24.746
24.746

Total area
0
15643.41
119652.08
86103.65
161376.27
40794.33
112364.31
159475.60

12888

233

695410

Hav

Iav

107.91584 0.008373

TC

3.1

3.07

CASE-2
slope
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01

Time of Concentration
,TC1=1/3000(L1/(S1)1/2 )0.77
TC
0.249211
0.703376
0.26393
0.496661
0.398796
0.308357
1.324197
3.744528
3.74

DESIGN RAINFALL ANALYSIS

1

DATA QALITY TAST

AVG RF Nr
48.87317
1
48.87317
2
48.87317
3
48.87317
4
48.87317
5
48.87317
6
48.87317
7
48.87317
8
48.87317
9
48.87317
10
48.87317
11
48.87317
12
48.87317
13
48.87317
14
48.87317
15
48.87317
16
48.87317
17
48.87317
18
48.87317
19
48.87317
20
48.87317
21
48.87317
22
48.87317
23
48.87317
24
48.87317
25
48.87317
26
48.87317
27
48.87317
28
48.87317
29
48.87317
30
48.87317
31
48.87317
32
48.87317
33
48.87317
34
48.87317
35
48.87317
36
48.87317
37
48.87317
38
48.87317
39
48.87317
40
48.87317
41
48.87317
42

Year
1960
1961
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2011

Max.
RF(Xi)
(mm)
79.1
54
90
100
47.0
30.0
38.0
47.0
51.2
40.7
50.0
42.5
40.1
55.2
60.6
59.2
38.3
33.0
38.3
31.0
28.6
44.4
55.5
37.5
35.4
41.3
60.5
50.5
65.7
65.6
40.5
56.2
40.9
65.8
38.6
39.2
4.2
54.9
44.5
53.4
55.4
36.8

Descending
order (X)
100
90
79.1
65.8
65.7
65.6
60.6
60.5
59.2
56.2
55.5
55.4
55.2
54.9
54.0
53.4
51.2
50.5
50.0
47.0
47.0
44.5
44.4
42.5
41.3
40.9
40.7
40.5
40.1
39.2
38.6
38.3
38.3
38.0
37.5
36.8
35.4
33.0
31.0
30.0
28.6
4.2

Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42

Y = Log(Xi)
(Y-Ym)^2
2.00
0.1203441608
1.95
0.0906907615
1.90
0.0600656978
1.82
0.027268727
1.82
0.0270510153
1.82
0.0268338467
1.78
0.0167389731
1.78
0.0165538932
1.77
0.0142153794
1.75
0.0093398452
1.74
0.0083173565
1.74
0.0081751116
1.74
0.0078935472
1.74
0.0074786008
1.73
0.0062885406
1.73
0.0055424773
1.71
0.0031558014
1.70
0.0025198329
1.70
0.0021046591
1.67
0.0003611679
1.67
0.0003611679
1.65
2.240536E-005
1.65
3.260948E-005
1.63
0.0006103129
1.62
0.0013796314
1.61
0.0017114879
1.61
0.0018921658
1.61
0.0020828652
1.60
0.0024949094
1.59
0.003576922
1.59
0.0044230661
1.58
0.0048852645
1.58
0.0048852645
1.58
0.0053743333
1.57
0.0062508272
1.57
0.0076117986
1.55
0.0108347653
1.52
0.0181116421
1.49
0.026157158
1.48
0.0309662103
1.46
0.0387016729
0.62
1.0605789742

SUM
Mean Q
SD
SKEWNESS
COEFICIENT
Max
Min
N
42

2040.6
48.6
16.7

48.6
16.7

X=

Xm =X/N
2040.6 48.58571429

69.4
1.7
0.2

0.7254
100.0 mm
4.2 mm

1.7

-3.074328524

(X-Xm) = n-1

Y=

11470.4 16.726225522

69.4

Ym =Y/N
1.65309344

(Y-Ym) =
2

1.7

Before proceeding to the other analysis, the adequacy of rainfall data series should be checked and it should be realized. The d
considered and adequate if relative standard error,
where

e<10%, where se is the relative standard error

2.58091 standard eror

e =

5.3121 < 10%

Ok!

There for the data is reliable and adequate

Data quality test

Case 1
If Skew ness (Cs) < -0.4 check for lower outlier
Case 2
If Skew ness (Cs) > +0.4 check for higher outlier
Case 3
If Skew ness (Cs), -0.4<CS< +0.4 check for both outlier
In our case Cs =-3.074 i.e < -0.4 so check for higher outlier
Determination of threshold value for higher outliers of daily heaviest rainfall
Parameters

Values log
transferred

Coefficient of skewness, Cs

-3.0743285241

Standard deviation Sy = n
Mean(Ym)
No. Data
Kn( for 41 years of data (from
standard table above)

Remark

0.2032591071
1.6530934408
42
2.7

From table

1. Data consistency checking

Relative standard= /xmean=

5.312

2. Chexk for outliers

2.1 Test for higher outlier

Y H =Y mean + K n n
YH =

Depth=10

2.20
YH

159.2

2.2 Test for lower outlier

Y L=Y mean K n n

The highest recorded valuein the da

recorded didn't departs significantly

Y L=Y mean K n n
YH =

1.10

The lower limit for the series is

Depth=10YH

12.7

Design rainfall

DATA

1 LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTION
C.Skewness
S.devation
mean
Retern period (T)
P

(3.07)
0.2
1.7
50
0.02

N.B,only for 0<p0.5 but for P >0.5

=

2.79714962

K50=

=
XT(50)

2.07062598

117.65922385 117.659224

2 LOG-PERSON TYPE-III DISTRIBUTION

k=
z=

Cs/6

-0.5123880873
2.0541885887

Y50

1.7846738101

XT(50)

60.907925817

3 EXTREME VALUE DISTRIBUTION (Type-1)

=

2.18026686

2.5936029427

XT(50)

151.4491566

4 GAMBLE'S METHOD

PT=P+Kn-1
P
K=
YT = for N =X tabel 5.5

48.6
(YT-Yn)/Sn
Ln(Ln(T/T-1))

Yn

0.545

Sn

1.143

K
n-1

2.93764866

PT=

97.7214883

16.7

table- 3 Summary of calculated values of design rainfall

S.N
Method
XT
1 LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTION
117.66
2 LOG-PERSON TYPE-III DISTRIBUTION
60.91
3 LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
151.449
4 GAMBLE'S METHOD
97.72

remark

largest

weibull formula

(X-Xm)^2
(R/(N+1))*100
931.121632653
2
29.3144897959
5
1715.14306122
7
2643.42877551
10
2.5144897959
12
345.42877551
15
112.057346939
17
2.5144897959
20
6.8344897959
22
62.1844897959
24
2.0002040816
27
37.0359183673
29
72.0073469388
32
43.7487755102
34
144.343061224
37
112.663061224
39
105.795918367
41
242.914489796
44
105.795918367
46
309.257346939
49
399.42877551
51
17.5202040816
54
47.8073469388
56
122.893061224
59
173.863061224
61
53.0816326531
63
141.950204082
66
3.6644897959
68
292.89877551
71
289.485918367
73
65.3787755102
76
57.9773469388
78
59.0702040816
80
296.331632653
83
99.7144897959
85
88.0916326531
88
1970.09163265
90
39.8702040816
93
16.6930612245
95
23.1773469388
98
46.4344897959
100
138.903061224
102

120
100

RF(daily max)

(Y-Ym)^3
0.041748
0.027311
0.014721
0.004503
0.004449
0.004396
0.002166
0.00213
0.001695
0.000903
0.000759
0.000739
0.000701
0.000647
0.000499
0.000413
0.000177
0.000126
9.7E-005
6.9E-006
6.9E-006
-1E-007
-2E-007
-2E-005
-5E-005
-7E-005
-8E-005
-1E-004
-0.000125
-0.000214
-0.000294
-0.000341
-0.000341
-0.000394
-0.000494
-0.000664
-0.001128
-0.002437
-0.00423
-0.005449
-0.007614
-1.092231

80
60
1987

40
20
0
Max. RF(Xi)(mm)

Year

AVG RF

-1.0081

11470.4

(Y-Ym)

3=

-1.0081

Sy
Cs
0.2032591071 -3.07432852

and it should be realized. The data series could be

rror

is reliable and adequate

< 10%, There for the data recored for 42 years of period could not be regarded as reliable and adequate

highest recorded valuein the data is (100mm)that is Less than high outlier (159.2mm). Hence the daily heaviest rain fall data
rded didn't departs significantly from the threshold value of higher outliers.

he lower limit for the series is (22.2 mm) but there is data in our record less than this values(4.2mm).hence there is lower out lier in
needs to removed continue with the analysis!!!!

(KT)from tabel

nfall

Cs-P
0.000
0.40
0.50
(3.07)
0.60

nly for 0<p0.5 but for P >0.5 "P2" will be (1-P)2

N.B
=

if Cs=0 then z=KT

0.65

2.4936

2.054

2.494

retern period(T)
25
50
100
Exceedence probability (p=1/T)
0.040 0.020 0.010
1.751 2.054 2.326
1.88
2.26
2.62
1.91 2.311 2.686
0.8734 2.494 2.90318
1.939 2.36
2.755

freqency factor
3.901939

0.98

Interpolet

Sn= n

N
40
41
50

N
1.141
1.143
1.160

Yn
40
41
50

0.544
0.545
0.549

104.3

1987

AVG RF

Outlier test Kn
values

81.3
80.7

sample
size n

Kn

80.6

2.036
2.088
2.134
2.175
2.213
2.247
2.279
2.309
2.335
2.361
2.385
2.408
2.429
2.448
2.467
2.486
2.502
2.519
2.534
2.549
2.563
2.577
2.591
2.604
2.616
2.628
2.639
2.65
2.661
2.671
2.682
2.692
2.7
2.71
2.719
2.727
2.736
2.744
2.753
2.76

75
71.2
70.9
69.9
67.7
67
66
63.8
62.7
62
58
58
58
55.5
55
54.5
54
53.6
53.4
52
51.4
50.6
50.6
47.3
47
47
45.8
45.1
45
44.6
44.5
44
42.5
42
35.5

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49

iest rain fall data

50 2.768

ence there is lower out lier in our record which

om tabel

ern period(T)

200
ce probability (p=1/T)
0.005
2.576
2.95
3.041
3.2922895
3.13

DESIGN RAINFALL ANALYSIS

1

DATA QALITY TAST

Nr
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
SUM

Year
1960
1961
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2004
2005
2006
2007
2011

Max.
RF(Xi)
(mm)
79.1
54
90
100
47.0
30.0
38.0
47.0
51.2
40.7
50.0
42.5
40.1
55.2
60.6
59.2
38.3
33.0
38.3
31.0
28.6
44.4
55.5
37.5
35.4
41.3
60.5
50.5
65.7
65.6
40.5
56.2
40.9
65.8
38.6
39.2
54.9
44.5
53.4
55.4
36.8

Descending
order (X)
100
90
79.1
65.8
65.7
65.6
60.6
60.5
59.2
56.2
55.5
55.4
55.2
54.9
54.0
53.4
51.2
50.5
50.0
47.0
47.0
44.5
44.4
42.5
41.3
40.9
40.7
40.5
40.1
39.2
38.6
38.3
38.3
38.0
37.5
36.8
35.4
33.0
31.0
30.0
28.6
2036.4

Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41

Y = Log(Xi)
(Y-Ym)^2
2.00
0.1035477803
1.95
0.076193068
1.90
0.048384554
1.82
0.019604005
1.82
0.0194194756
1.82
0.0192355398
1.78
0.0108703631
1.78
0.0107213152
1.77
0.0088567139
1.75
0.0051157862
1.74
0.0043667504
1.74
0.0042638515
1.74
0.0040611926
1.74
0.0037651421
1.73
0.0029357074
1.73
0.002433416
1.71
0.0009646224
1.70
0.0006289957
1.70
0.0004309117
1.67
3.737773E-005
1.67
3.737773E-005
1.65
0.0008911168
1.65
0.0009504039
1.63
0.0024822975
1.62
0.0038764993
1.61
0.0044206918
1.61
0.0047083176
1.61
0.0050064919
1.60
0.0056350873
1.59
0.0072123446
1.59
0.0083950098
1.58
0.0090274354
1.58
0.0090274354
1.58
0.00968807
1.57
0.0108535397
1.57
0.0126256173
1.55
0.0166947922
1.52
0.0255033397
1.49
0.034912884
1.48
0.0404373233
1.46
0.0492154515
68.8
0.6

Mean Q
SD

49.7
15.37

SKEWNESS
COEFICIENT
Max
Min

X=

1.678
0.123

1.3692
100.0 mm
28.6 mm

Xm =X/N
41 2036.4 49.66829268

49.7
15.4

0.5299

(X-Xm) = n-1
2

9452.3 15.372287387

Y=
68.8

Ym =Y/N
1.67821159

(Y-Ym) =
2

0.6

Before proceeding to the other analysis, the adequacy of rainfall data series should be checked and it should be realized. The d
considered and adequate if relative standard error,
where

Where

Sy =
N=
Xm =
Se =

e10%, where se is the relative standard error

2.40075 standard eror

e =
n-1

4.8336 < 10%

Ok!
There for the data is reliable and adequate
Standard devation of the sample data
Number of the data
Mean of the data
Standard error

Data quality test

Case 1
If Skew ness (Cs) < -0.4 check for lower outlier
Case 2
If Skew ness (Cs) > +0.4 check for higher outlier
Case 3
If Skew ness (Cs), -0.4<CS< +0.4 check for both outlier
In our case Cs =0.5299 i.e Case-2 so check for higher outlier
Determination of threshold value for higher outliers of daily heaviest rainfall
Parameters

Values log
transferred

Coefficient of skewness, Cs

0.5298646574

Standard deviation Sy = n
Mean(Ym)
No. Data
Kn( for 41 years of data (from
standard table above)
Max value of the data
Min Value of the data

Remark

0.1232312963
1.6782115909
41
2.692

From table

100
28.6
1. Data consistency checking

Relative standard= /xmean=

0.04833562
2.40074795
2. Chexk for outliers

5%

2.1 Test for higher outlier

Y H =Y mean + K n n
YH =

2.01

Depth=10YH

The highest recorded valuein the da

recorded is not departs significantly

102.3

2.2 Test for lower outlier

Y L=Y mean K n n
YH =

1.35

The lower limit for the series i

Depth=10YH

22.2

Design rainfall

DATA

1 NORMAL DISTRIBUTION METHOD

C.Skewness

0.53

S.devation(Sy = n-1)
mean
Retern period (T)
P

15.4
49.7
50
0.02

N.B,only for 0<p0.5 but for P >0.

=

2.79714962

K50=

DATA

2 LOG-PERSON TYPE-III DISTRIBUTION

C.Skewness
S.devation(Sy = n-1)
mean
Retern period (T)
P

k=
z=

Cs/6

0.0883107762
2.0541885887

81.24587

0.53
0.1
1.7
50
0.02

Y50

XT(50)

1.9649614868
92.2

3 LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

C.Skewness

0.53

S.devation(Sy = n-1)
mean
Retern period (T)
P

XT(50)

0.1
1.7
50
0.02

2.80

1.93135191

85.38

4 GAMBLE'S METHOD
Mean of all values annual rain falXm

=
KT =

(YT-Yn)/Sn where

YT = -

Ln(Ln(T/T-1))

49.7

Yn

Reduced mean in Gambles extreme value

distribution
for N sample
sizeinfrom
table;
Reduced standard
deviation
Gambles

0.545

Sn

extreme value distribution for N sample size

from table;

1.143

KT=
Standard deviation of annual rainn-1
XT =

3.9019386579

for N =X tabel 5.5

2.93764866
15.4
94.8266722

table- 3 Summary of calculated values of design rainfall

S.N
Method
XT
1 NORMAL DISTRIBUTION METHOD
81.25
2 LOG-PERSON TYPE-III DISTRIBUTION
92.25
3 LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
85.379
4 GAMBLE'S METHOD
94.83

remark

Largest

weibull formula

(Y-Ym)^3
0.0333205
0.0210316
0.0106429
0.0027448
0.0027062
0.0026678
0.0011334
0.0011101
0.0008335
0.0003659
0.0002886
0.0002784
0.0002588
0.000231
0.0001591
0.00012
3.00E-005
1.58E-005
8.95E-006
-2.3E-007
-2.3E-007
-2.7E-005
-2.9E-005
-0.000124
-0.000241
-0.000294
-0.000323
-0.000354
-0.000423
-0.000613
-0.000769
-0.000858
-0.000858
-0.000954
-0.001131
-0.001419
-0.002157
-0.004073
-0.006523
-0.008132
-0.010918
0.0377

(X-Xm)^2
(R/(N+1))*100
866.225395598
2
18.7636882808
5
1626.64661511
7
2533.28076145
10
7.1197858418
12
386.841737061
14
136.149054134
17
7.1197858418
19
2.3461273052
21
80.4302736466
24
0.1100297442
26
51.3844199881
29
91.5522248662
31
30.5997858418
33
119.502224866
36
90.8534443783
38
129.238078525
40
277.831980964
43
129.238078525
45
348.505151695
48
443.872956573
50
27.754907793
52
34.008810232
55
148.067346817
57
203.584176086
60
70.0283224271
62
117.325883403
64
0.6917370613
67
257.0156395
69
253.819298037
71
84.0575907198
74
42.6632004759
76
76.8829565735
79
260.231980964
81
122.507102915
83
109.585151695
86
27.3707614515
88
26.7112492564
90
13.9256395003
93
32.8524687686
95
165.592956573
98
9452.3

(Y-Ym)

3=

0.0377

Sy
Cs
0.1232312963 0.529864657

and it should be realized. The data series could be

or

is reliable and adequate

< 10%, There for the data recored for 41 years of period could be regarded as reliable and adequate

highest recorded valuein the data is (100mm)that is Less than high outlier (102.3mm). Hence the daily heaviest rain fall data
rded is not departs significantly from the threshold value of higher outliers.

The lower limit for the series is (22.2 mm) and also there is no data in our record less than this values.hence there is no lower out lier
continue with the analysis!!!!

(KT)from tabel

nfall

retern period(T)
25
50
100
Exceedence probability (p=1/T)
Cs-P
0.000
0.40
0.50
0.53
0.60

nly for 0<p0.5 but for P >0.5 "P2" will be (1-P)2

N.B
=

2.054

if Cs=0 then z=KT

2.33

2.311

2.325

0.040
1.751
1.88
1.91
1.9187
1.939

0.020
2.054
2.26
2.311
2.325
2.36

0.010
2.326
2.62
2.686
2.707
2.755

2.054

freqency factor

0.98

Interpolet

Sn= n

N
40
41
50

N
1.141
1.143
1.160

Yn
40
41
50

0.544
0.545
0.549

Outlier test Kn
values
sample
size n

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
43
44
45
46
47
48
49

Kn

2.036
2.088
2.134
2.175
2.213
2.247
2.279
2.309
2.335
2.361
2.385
2.408
2.429
2.448
2.467
2.486
2.502
2.519
2.534
2.549
2.563
2.577
2.591
2.604
2.616
2.628
2.639
2.65
2.661
2.671
2.682
2.692
2.71
2.719
2.727
2.736
2.744
2.753
2.76

50 2.768

aviest rain fall data

.hence there is no lower out lier in our record

rom tabel

tern period(T)

200
nce probability (p=1/T)
0.005
2.576
2.95
3.041
3.0681768
3.13

GEBEZA HY
Step

Parameter

Unit

Value

Km2

32.01

Length of main river

12,888.00

Time of concentration, Tc

hr

3.7

Rain fall exess duration,

Tc/6

hr

1.00

Time to peak,
+ 0.5 D

hr

2.7

Time base of hydrograph,

Tb = 2.67tp

hr

7.33

Lag time, te= 0.6 Tc

hr

2.2

m3/s/mm

2.4

10

11

Duration

Daily point rainfall

hr

mm

Catchment Area

D=

Tp= 0.6 Tc

Peak rate of discharge created by

1mm RF excess on whole of the
catchment Qp=0.21*QA/Tp
,Qp=1mm(assumed)

0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00

1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00

94.83

18

19

20

If TC is < 3hr duration is TC/6;

=1hr if >10hr then dur

End of base of
Hydrograph

12

13
Areal to point
rainfall ratio

Rainfall Profile
%

mm

44.90

42.58

76.04

58.90

55.85

80.88

66.30

62.87

84.16

73.00

69.22

86.16

76.30

72.35

87.16

79.30

75.20

87.72

81.40

77.19

90.44

83.50

79.18

91.44

84.90

80.51

92.44

86.00

81.55

90.77

85.40

80.98

91.11

21

22

23

Times of incremental hydrograph

Rearranged
order

Rearranged incremental order

Cummulative order

Rearranged
order

Rearranged incremental order

Cummulative order

No.

mm

10

Time of beginning

Time to peak

Time to end

mm

hr

hr

hr

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.75

7.33

2.59

2.59

1.00

3.75

8.33

2.90

5.49

2.00

4.75

9.33

6.73

12.23

3.00

5.75

10.33

12.80

25.02

4.00

6.75

11.33

32.37

57.40

5.00

7.75

12.33

7.74

65.14

6.00

8.75

13.33

3.42

68.56

7.00

9.75

14.33

3.85

72.40

8.00

10.75

15.33

2.02

74.42

9.00

11.75

16.33

11

0.00

74.42

10.00

12.75

17.33

26

27

Hydrologic Soil
group

Textural Class

24

25
Area ratio

Land use or cover

NO

Area (Km )

Ratio

25.37

0.792

Cultivation
Cultivation

1.32

0.041

Cultivation

0.19

0.006

Cultivation

1.55

0.048

Cultivation

0.01

0.000

2.57

0.080

Grassland
Grassland

0.36

0.011

Grassland

0.23

0.007

0.08

0.002

0.12

0.004

0.21

0.007

32.01

1.000

Shrubland
9
10
11

Shrubland
Wetland

14.52
22

The maximum potential difference

b/n Rainfall (p) and direct runoff (Q),
S = (25400/CN) - 254,
CN=Value corresponding to AMC III

33

mm

( P 0.2S )
Q
( P 0.2S )

(p-3.2)2/(p+13)

p (mm)

Q (mm)

0.00

0.00

2.59

0.00

5.49

0.39

12.23

3.64

25.02

13.35

57.40

43.03

65.14

50.46

68.56

53.76

72.40

57.48

74.42

59.44

74.42

59.44

36

37

38

Cumulative run off

Incremental run off

Peak run off for

increment

Time of beginning

hrs

mm

mm

m3/sec

hrs

1.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.00

2.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.00

3.00

3.00

0.39

0.39

0.96

2.00

4.00

4.00

3.64

3.25

7.96

3.00

5.00

5.00

13.35

9.71

23.76

4.00

6.00

6.00

43.03

29.67

72.63

5.00

7.00

7.00

50.46

7.43

18.18

6.00

8.00

8.00

53.76

3.30

8.08

7.00

34

25400
S=
254
CN

35
NO
Duration

39

9.00

9.00

57.48

3.73

9.12

8.00

10.00

10.00

59.44

1.96

4.80

9.00

11.00

11.00

59.44

0.00

0.00

10.00

(hr)

0.000

0.000

1.000

0.000

40
Time

Ordinate of Hydrograph (m^3/Sec)

0.000

2.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

3.000

0.000

0.000

0.320

0.000

4.000

0.000

0.000

0.639

2.653

0.000

5.000

0.000

0.000

0.959

5.306

7.921

6.000

0.000

0.000

0.835

7.959

15.842

7.000

0.000

0.000

0.729

6.467

23.763

8.000

0.000

0.000

0.614

4.975

19.308

9.000

0.000

0.000

0.499

3.482

14.853

10.000

0.000

0.000

0.384

1.990

10.397

9.747

0.000

0.000

0.413

2.368

11.526

10.747

0.000

0.000

0.298

0.876

7.071

0.000

0.183

-0.616

2.615

0.068

-2.109

-1.840

0.000

4.455

11.747
12.747
11.334
12.334

0.000

13.334
14.334
15.334
16.334
17.334

41

120.000

DISCHARGE (m3/Sec.)

100.000

80.000

60.000

40.000

20.000

COMPLEX HYDROGRA

12

DISCHARG

60.000

40.000

20.000

0.000
0.000

3.000

6.000

9.000 (hr)
TIME

12.000

Table: Base flow (m3/s) Estimation by Separation Method

Months
Parameter
RFKamashi (mm)
RFKamashi (cm)
Base flow (m3/s)

1
JAN
1.2

2
FEB
0.6

3
MAR
9.8

4
APR
19.9

5
MAY
61.7

0.1175
0.017

0.0645
0.01

0.9755
0.14

1.9865
0.28

6.1685
0.88

GEBEZA HYDROLOGY
Time

Rain Fall
Ratio of

If TC is < 3hr duration is TC/6; if >3hr then duration

=1hr if >10hr then duration=2hr

Daily R.Fall

14

15

16

17

Areal-rainfall

Incremental rainfall

Descending
order

Descending
order

mm

mm

No.

32.37

32.37

32.37

45.17

12.80

12.80

52.91

7.74

7.74

59.64

6.73

6.73

63.06

3.42

3.42

65.96

2.90

2.90

69.81

3.85

3.85

72.40

2.59

2.59

74.42

2.02

2.02

74.03

0.00

10

73.78

0.00

11

hr.

0.000

0.000

0.000
0.081
0.138
0.275

10
15
20
25

0.375
0.500
0.563
0.719
1.094
1.250
1.500
1.744
2.188
2.500
2.794
3.625
4.625
6.563
10.000
14.000

30
32.5
35
40
45
50
53.125
55
60
62.5
65
70
75
80
85
90

18.688
23.000

Area

28

29

30

Stream Flow
Potential

Curve No. 'CN'

Weighted "CN"

31

32

Sum weighted "CN"

Duration
I (hrs)

100
68
61
57
54
52
50
44
42
41
40
38
39
38
37
36
36
35
34
34
33
33
31

30

Poor
Good

88

69.73

84

3.46

Good
Good

84

0.49

84

4.07

Good
Poor
Poor

84

0.02

86

6.90

73

0.83

Poor

73

0.54

Poor
Poor

66

0.16

750

83

0.31

Poor

100

0.67

CN

II

87.18

III

0.5

0
25
50
75
100
125
150
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
550
575
600
725

AMC

95
100

94.59

int
area =

32.01

87.18

32.01 Km2

66.04

Duration
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00

39
Time to

peak

Time to end

2.75

7.33

3.75

8.33

4.75

9.33

5.75

10.33

6.75

11.33

7.75

12.33

8.75

13.33

9.75

14.33

10.75

15.33

11.75

16.33

12.75

17.33

10

Total

0.000
0.000

Arial to pt. RF ratio

76.04
80.88
84.16
86.16
87.16
87.72
90.44
91.44
92.44
90.77
91.11

0.000
0.320
3.293
0.000

14.186

24.210

0.000

48.847

48.420

6.062

0.000

72.630

12.123

2.694

0.000

59.013

18.185

5.389

5.220

0.000

106.640

45.396

14.775

8.083

10.441

2.747

94.213

48.844

15.639

8.467

9.118

2.051

98.427

35.227

12.230

6.951

7.734

4.797

75.184

21.610

8.820

5.436

6.350

3.939

48.337

7.993

5.411

3.920

4.966

3.341

21.750

27.234

10.228

6.062

6.922

4.370

59.271

13.617

6.819

4.546

5.537

3.642

34.161

0.000

3.409

3.031

4.153

2.913

13.507

0.000

1.515

2.769

2.185

6.469

0.000

1.384

1.457

2.841

0.000

0.728

0.728

0.000

0.000

85.441
112.344

0.000

112.344

EX HYDROGRAPH

12

9.000 (hr)
TIME

12.000

Months
6
JUN
164.6
16.4615
2.35

15.000

18.000

7
JUL
250.4

8
AUG
215.4

9
SEP
103.3

10
OCT
63.8

11
NOV
11.4

12
DEC
1.8

Mean

25.0415
3.57

21.5355
3.07

10.3275
1.47

6.383
0.91

1.141
0.16

0.18
0.03

7.532083
1.08

30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Bas e flow (m3/s )

10

12

14

75.3

RainFall
Ratio

Hr

1.00

44.9

RAIN FALL RATIO AS % OF DAILY RAINFALL

Duration

110

2.00

58.9

3.00

66.3

TIME DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL RATIO AS % OF

100
90
80
70

4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00

73.0
76.3
79.3
81.4

8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00

83.5
84.9
86.0
85.4

60
50
40
30
20
10
0

1.000
3.000
5.000
7.000
9.000 11.000 13.000 15.000 17.000 19.000 21.000 23
0.000
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000 10.000 12.000 14.000 16.000 18.000 20.000 22.000
TIME (hr)

Table - IVA-1B.1 Arial to Point Ratio (%)

12

15

18

100
78
71
67
65
63
61
55
54
53
53
52
51
50

100
82
78
75
73
72
70
66
65
54
63
63
62
61

100
85
82
79
78
76
75
71
70
70
58
68
68
67

100
87
84
82
80
79
78
74
74
73
72
72
71
71

100
88
85
84
82
81
80
77
76
75
73
74
74
73

100
88
87
83
83
82
61
78
78
77
77
76
78
75

100
91
89
87
86
85
84
82
81
81
80
80
80
79

100
92
90
89
88
87
86
84
84
83
83
82
82
82

100
93
91
90
89
88
88
86
85
85
84
84
84
83

100
93
92
91
90
89
89
87
86
86
86
85
85
85

50
49
48
48
47
47
46
45
45

61
60
60
59
59
58
58
57
55

67
66
66
66
65
64
64
63
62

70
70
69
69
68
68
68
67
69

73
72
72
72
71
71
71
70
69

75
74
74
74
73
73
73
72
71

79
79
78
78
78
77
77
77
75

81
81
81
80
80
80
80
80
78

83
83
83
82
82
82
82
81
80

84
84
84
84
83
83
83
83
82

43

55

61

68
49

68

71

75

78

80

82

interpolation for the given catchment area

80.88
84.16
86.16
87.16
87.72

90.44

91.44

92.44

92.72

76.04

Hr
9

inte
90.44

Table - IVA-1B.3 Runoff CN

CN for AMC
II
I
III
100
100
100
98
94
99
96
89
99
94
85
98
92
81
97
90
78
96
88
75
95
86
72
94
84
68
93
82
66
92
80
63
91
78
60
90
76
58
89
74
55
88
72
53
86
70
51
85

68
66
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
40
38
36
34
32
30
25
20
15
10

48
46
44
42
40
38
36
34
32
31
29
22
21
19
18
16
15
12
9
6
4

84
82
81
79
78
76
75
73
71
70
68
60
58
56
54
52
50
48
37
30
22

12

91.44

10

90.77
91.11

11

5
0

2
0

13
0

ALL RATIO AS % OF DAILY RAINFALL

17.000 19.000 21.000 23.000

.000 18.000 20.000 22.000 24.000

21

24

100
94
92
91
91
90
89
88
87
87
87
87
86
86

100
94
93
92
91
91
90
89
88
88
87
87
87
87

85
85
85
85
85
84
84
84
83

86
86
86
86
85
85
85
85
84

83

84

93.44

93.72

w
32.37411
12.79854
7.737813
6.731379
3.419666
2.901385
3.84594
2.592768
2.018998
0
0