Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.disabilityandhealthjnl.com
Research Paper
Abstract
Background: Attitudes of students of health care professions, such as physiotherapy, toward persons with disability may influence their
attitude and practice post-qualification.
Objective: To examine attitudes toward persons with disability among undergraduate physiotherapy students in Universities in Nigeria.
Methods: The 30-item Attitudes toward Disabled Persons e Form A (ATDP-A) scale was used to assess the attitudes of penultimate
and final year physiotherapy students in 3 Nigerian universities. Overall and item-by-item analyzes of responses to the ATDP-A scale were
carried out. Differences in attitude by sex, age, year and university of study were also examined using independent t-test and one-way
ANOVA.
Results: One hundred and sixty-nine students with a male majority (56.2%) participated in the study. Mean score on the ATDP-A was
94.95 6 17.50 with more students (60.4%) having a score O90 which depicts positive attitude. Item-by-item analysis of responses to the 30
items on the ATDP-A showed that negative attitudes were preponderant on items relating to the emotional component of the personality of
persons with disability. Only age of students and their university of study however resulted in statistically significant differences in attitudes
and older students reported better attitudes toward persons with disability.
Conclusions: Although the overall attitude of the physiotherapy students was positive, negative stereotypes and discriminatory tendencies were observed in issues relating to the perceived emotional capacity of persons with disabilities. Educational strategies capable
of effecting more positive attitudes in physiotherapy students in Nigeria toward persons with disability are urgently needed. 2015 Elsevier
Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Attitude; Physiotherapy; Physiotherapy students; Persons with disability; Nigeria
The acknowledged importance of physiotherapy students attitude toward persons with disability has resulted
in several studies in different countries of the world.5,7e12
The influence of culture on attitude toward persons with
disability13e15 further necessitates these country-specific
data. Additionally, with an estimated population of over a
billion people with various forms of disability worldwide,3
the attention on the attitude of future providers of care is
well placed and essential. There are however no data on
the attitude of physiotherapy students in Nigeria.
Nigeria is the most populous country on the African continent with an estimated population of 160 million people. With
an estimated 1250 practicing physiotherapists16 primarily
engaged in institution-based practice, the physiotherapistpatient ratio in the country is approximately 1 per 100, 000.
Over the past decade, the population of persons with disability
in Nigeria has been put at between 14 and 25 million17,18 but
there are no existing laws that protect the rights of persons
with disability or specific national policies and programs that
address issues of their education, housing, transportation,
employment and general welfare. However, in line with
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
articles 25 and 26 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities which emphasizes the rights of persons
with disability to good quality health care without discrimination (Nigeria is a signatory to the Convention), physiotherapists must be equipped with the attitude required for
effective management of individuals with disability. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to examine the attitude of Nigerian physiotherapy students toward persons with disability in
order to ascertain their attitudinal preparedness for their
future practice in this regard and address possible shortcomings. We therefore surveyed attitudes of physiotherapy students undergoing training at three universities in Nigeria
using the Attitude toward Disabled Persons Scale-Form A
(ATDP-A)19 and explored associations between attitude and
aspects of the students demographics and education.
Methods
Study design
This cross-sectional multi-center study examined attitudes toward persons with disability among students undergoing undergraduate physiotherapy training in 3 Nigerian
universities. The study was approved by the Research and
Ethical Committee of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital Maiduguri and was conducted in 2012.
Study location
Clinical physiotherapy students were recruited from
three universities in Nigeria namely Nnamdi Azikiwe
University, University of Ibadan and University of Maiduguri. These 3 universities were purposively selected based
on the geographical regions of Nigeria and the available
universities offering physiotherapy training programs (7 in
all) in the country. Nnamdi Azikiwe University is located
in eastern Nigeria and is one of the 2 universities with a
physiotherapy training program in the region. University
of Ibadan is situated in the Western part of Nigeria and is
one of the 3 universities that provide physiotherapy training
in Western Nigeria. University of Maiduguri is one of the 2
training institutions with physiotherapy training programs in
Northern Nigeria (no university in Southern Nigeria is
currently training physiotherapy students).
As at the time of this study, the total number of clinical
physiotherapy students at the three universities was 197.
One hundred and four students were in the clinical phase
of study at the University of Maiduguri, 56 were at the University of Ibadan while Nnamdi Azikiwe University had 39
clinical physiotherapy students. All clinical physiotherapy
students at these universities who were willing to participate
in the study by providing informed consent were recruited.
Undergraduate physiotherapy training in Nigeria
Undergraduate physiotherapy education in Nigeria spans
5 academic calendars. The first year regarded as the
103
preliminary phase of study, entails classroom and laboratory courses in natural sciences, and selected general
courses. At the second phase of study also known as the preclinical phase, preclinical courses such as anatomy, physiology and biochemistry, and introductory physiotherapy
courses are taken although there are slight variations across
universities on the duration and end of the phase. The 4th
(penultimate) and 5th (final) years are characterized by core
physiotherapy courses including lectures, seminars and clinical placement. Regarded as the clinical phase, this period
of training also includes the Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES) which provides a platform for
students to gain work experience outside their training institutions. The Scheme involves rotations through different
physiotherapy work situations, including care homes for
persons with disabilities. Although slight variations exist
in the individual universities, the contents of the physiotherapy training curricula are as approved by the Medical
Rehabilitation Therapist (Registration) Board of Nigeria
(MRTB),20 the regulatory body for physiotherapy training
and practice in Nigeria, and the National Universities Commission (NUC) which is the body with the statutory role of
regulating university education in Nigeria.
Assessments and instruments
We obtained information on the students gender, age
and level of study using a demographic data form. Attitude
toward Disabled Persons Scale-Form A (ATDP-A)19 was
used to assess each students attitude toward persons with
disabilities. The ATDP-A is a self-administered instrument
that utilizes a six point Likert-type scale with responses
ranging from I agree very much to I disagree very
much. The overall score ranges from 0 to 180 and can
be divided into two categories namely; 0e90 (negative attitude) and 91e180 (positive attitude). The ATDP-A is a
valid, reliable and widely used instrument for the assessment of attitudes toward persons with disability.21 The
ATDP-A scale was used in this study because it assesses
the degree to which persons with disability are considered
different from other individuals which mirrors the predominant view in Nigeria. Furthermore, the ATDP-A has been
used in previous studies of attitudes of Nigerians toward
persons with disabilities.22,23
Procedure
Physiotherapy students were recruited from the 3 Universities through purposive sampling. The authors distributed and retrieved copies of the ATDP-A scale from
physiotherapy students at the University of Ibadan and
University of Maiduguri. The questionnaires for students
at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University were sent and duly
completed copies were received by post. Questionnaires
with missing data were not discarded as a large proportion
of the students left out responses to few items (<3)
104
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
Table 1
Characteristics of the participants
Variable
Age (years)
Mean (SD)
Range
Age group (years)a
19e24
25e29
30e34
Gender
Male
Female
Year of study
Penultimate
Final
University
University of Maiduguri
University of Ibadan
Nnamdi Azikiwe university
a
24.58 (2.47)
19e34
76
72
6
49.4
46.8
3.9
95
74
56.2
43.8
88
81
52.1
47.9
89
53
27
52.7
31.4
16.0
Figures are for the 154 students that provided data on age.
possibly signifying neutrality, an option which is not provided for in the ATDP-A scale. Also the unwillingness to
disclose age even for purposes of research is a common
feature in our settings. Although the data of students with
missing information on age was utilized, we examined
the effect of age on attitude only for students who provided
information on their age.
Statistical analyses
The overall ATDP-A scale score was presented as mean
and standard deviation while frequencies and percentages
were used to summarize the distribution of the students
by gender, year of study, and into the 2 attitude categories
namely positive attitude and negative attitude. The attitude
scores for the various demographic and educational categories were also presented as means and standard
deviations.
Results
One hundred and sixty-nine physiotherapy students
participated in the study giving a response rate of 86%.
Mean age of the 154 students that reported their ages was
24.58 6 2.47 years (range 5 19e34 years). Males and students in the penultimate year of study were in the majority
and accounted for 56.2% and 52.1% of the students respectively (Table 1).
Scores on the ATDP-A scale ranged from 57 to 150 with
an overall mean score of 94.95 6 17.50.
Based on the cut-off score for the scale, positive attitude
was observed in 60.4% of the students. Frequency and percentage distribution of responses to each of the scales 30
items however showed that more students held negative
attitudes in 13 out of the 30 items. The items were item
numbers 3e5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18, 19, 26, 28 and 30
(Table 2). These items consider persons with disability as
being generally different, more emotional, worrisome,
and untidy compared to those without disability. More positive attitudes were however reported on issues of intelligence, competitiveness, self confidence and independence
of persons with disability and the need for inclusion
(Table 3). Responses were not provided for some items
but these were presented as missing data and the frequency
distributions of the missing data were also calculated.
Table 2
Frequency distribution of responses to ATDP-A scale items indicative of a preponderance of negative attitude
Response (%)
Item
Agree
Disagree
No response
3.
4.
5.
8.
10.
11.
15.
16.
18.
19.
26.
28.
29.
66.8
67.4
32.0
66.2
63.9
61.5
50.8
72.2
57.4
43.2
72.8
53.4
42.0
32.0
31.4
66.8
32.0
34.9
36.8
45.6
27.8
40.2
56.8
26.6
46.2
57.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.2
1.8
3.6
e
2.4
e
0.6
0.6
0.6
Items are presented according to their sequence in ATDP-A scale. Item 16 is not exactly as it appears on the ATDP-A scale.
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
105
Table 3
Frequency distribution of responses to ATDP-A scale items indicative of a preponderance of positive attitude
Response (%)
Item
Agree
Disagree
No response
1.
2.
6.
7.
9.
12.
13.
14.
17.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
27.
30.
45
39
45
27.2
65.1
55.6
44.4
52.6
49.7
47.3
56.8
60.4
82.2
74.6
66.3
14.2
37.3
53.8
60.4
53.8
72.8
33.1
42.6
55.6
43.8
47.9
52.1
43.2
37.8
17.8
24.2
33.1
83.4
62.7
1.2
e
1.2
e
1.8
1.8
e
3.6
2.4
e
e
1.8
e
1.2
0.6
2.4
e
Items are presented according to their sequence on the ATDP-A scale. Item 13 is abridged.
Table 4
Attitude of physiotherapy students by demographic and educational
characteristics
Characteristic
ATDP-A score mean (SD)
t-test/ANOVAa
P
Gender
Male
94.12
Female
96.03
Year of study
Penultimate
93.36
Final
96.68
Age group (years)
19e24
90.58
25e29
98.49
30e34
113.50
University
UNIMAID
101.15
UI
88.53
NAU
87.15
(18.92)
(15.54)
0.70
0.30
(18.39)
(16.42)
1.23
0.29
(15.28)
(17.52)
(26.06)
7.80
0.01
(17.79)
(14.82)
(13.78)
13.61
0.00
a
t-test for gender and year of study; one-way ANOVA for age group and
University. UNIMAID.
University of Maiduguri; UI: University of Ibadan; NAU: Nnamdi Azikiwe
University.
Discussion
Attitude of physiotherapy students toward persons with
disability may provide insights into their disposition about
disability and future attitudes as practitioners. Based on the
ATDP-A scale utilized in this study, undergraduate physiotherapy students in Nigeria could be said to possess a
generally positive attitude toward persons with disability.
With an overall mean score of 94.95 6 17.50 that falls
within the range of positive attitude, attitudes of Nigerian
physiotherapy students toward people with disability also
appear to be similar to that of physiotherapy students in
other African countries such as Ghana10 and Malawi,12
notwithstanding the heterogeneity of methods of attitude
assessment. It is however also important to note that in spite
of the positive attitude reflected, the overall mean score in
this study is lower than the ATDP scale mean scores reported in studies of physiotherapy and other health professions students in Asian and Western countries.5,24e26
In addition to overall attitude, information on the nature of
the students attitude as it relates to specific perceptions about
persons with disability may better assist in identifying and
addressing possible misconceptions and negative attitudes.
The multi-item structure of the ATDP-A scale allowed for
such specific scrutiny in this study. Consistently, a majority
of the students held negative attitudes regarding emotional
aspects of the personality of individuals with disability. Responses to six out of the seven ATDP-A items on emotional
disposition of persons with disability revealed certain misconceptions. Persons with disability were perceived as more
sympathy-, praise-, affection- and attention-seeking, and
more easily discouraged, more emotional, self-conscious
and sensitive than other people. The majority of the students
also considered severely disabled persons as worrying more
106
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
33
Conclusion
The outcome of this study showed that physiotherapy
students in Nigeria have a generally positive attitude toward
persons with disability. However, the specific negative perceptions held by the students regarding persons with
disability should be a source of concern to all stakeholders.
These negative attitudes, if retained post-qualification, may
serve as barriers and impediments to effective health care
for persons with disabilities. The urgent need to integrate
core courses on disability into the undergraduate physiotherapy training curricula in Nigeria that will among other
things emphasize the social model of disability is therefore
brought to the fore. Furthermore, the findings that the
perceived differentness of persons with disability was more
pronounced in some aspects of life than others should also
serve as an impetus for the development and integration of
107
References
1. World Health Organization, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, 2001, World Health Organization;
Geneva, Switzerland, URL www3.who.int/icf/onlinebrowser/icf.cfm?
parentlevel-2&childlevel.
2. American Physical Therapy Association, Role of a Physical Therapist.
Guide to Physical Therapist Practice, 2nd ed., 2003.
3. World Health Organization. Disability and Health. Fact Sheet N0352.
URL, www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs352/en/; September 2013.
4. Satchindanand N, Gunukula SK, Lam WY, et al. Attitudes of healthcare
students and professionals toward patients with physical disability: a
systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:533e545.
5. Vargo JW, Semple JE. Professional and personal attitudes of physiotherapy students toward disabled persons. Aust J Physiother. 1988;34:
23e26.
6. Lyons M. Enabling or Disabling? Students attitudes toward persons
with disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;45:311e316.
7. Au KW, Man DW. Attitudes toward people with disabilities: a comparison between health care professionals and students. Int J Rehabil Res.
2006;29:155e160.
8. Stachura K, Garven F. A national survey of occupational therapy students and physiotherapy students attitudes to disabled people. Clin
Rehabil. 2007;21:442e449.
9. Williams RM, Geddes EL, Moll S, Li CY. Physical therapy students
perspectives on disability. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2007;5:
1e9.
10. Quartey JNA, Horton E, Owusu-Ansah B, Bello AI. Professional attitudes of clinical physiotherapy students and interns toward persons
with disabilities. GJP. 2009;1:23e25.
11. Arooj A, Malik AN, Siddiqi FA. Professional and personal attitude of
medical students towards disabled persons. Rawal Med J. 2013;38:
332e334.
12. Amosun S, Kambalametore S, Maart S, Ferguson G. Undergraduate
physiotherapy education in Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2013;25:40e44.
13. Pfeiffer D, Sam AA, Guinan M, et al. Attitudes toward disability in the
helping professions. DSQ. 2003;23:132e149.
14. Al-Abdulwahab SS, Al-Gain SI. Attitudes of Saudi Arabian health
care professionals towards people with physical disabilities. Asia
Pac Disabil Rehabil J. 2003;14:63e70.
15. Robey KL, Minihan PM, Long-Bellil LM, et al. Teaching health care
students about disability within a cultural competency context. Disabil
Health J. 2013;6:271e279.
16. World Congress of Physical Therapy. Nigeria: a profile of the profession. URL: www.wcpt.org/node/24323/cds.
17. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
18. United Nations. Statistics. URL, www.un.org/en/population; 2007.
108
G.O. Vincent-Onabajo and W.S. Malgwi / Disability and Health Journal 8 (2015) 102e108
19. Yuker HE, Block JR, Younng JH. The Measurement of Attitudes toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center;
1966.
20. Medical Rehabilitation Therapists (Registration) Board of Nigeria
(MRTB) Harmonised Curriculum of Studies for the Bachelor
of Physiotherapy (B.PT) Degree Programme in Nigerian Universities. MRTB. URL: www.mrtbnigeria.org.ng/media/archive1/docs/
curricula/professional/BPTCurriculum.pdf.
21. Yuker HE, Block JR, Younng JH. The Measurement of Attitudes toward
Disabled Persons. Human Resources Center. NY: Albertson; 1970.
22. Bamisaiye A, Dastoor D. Socio-economic and Cultural Differences in
Attitudes toward the Physically Handicapped in Nigeria. Behavioral
Sciences Research Unit, University of Ibadan; 1976.
23. Ekpro ET. Attitude of Nigerian students in the United States towards
disabled persons. MJAE. 2012;8:1e8.
24. Yuker HE, Block JR. Research with the Attitudes towards Disabled
Persons Scales (ATDP) 1960-1985. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Bookstore; 1986.
25. Paris MJ. Attitudes of medical students and health care professionals toward people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;78:818e825.
26. Chan CC, Lee TM, Yuen HK, Chan F. Attitudes toward people with
disabilities between Chinese rehabilitation and business students: implications for practice. Rehabil Psychol. 2002;47:324e338.
27. Oermann MH. Personal Experience with People Who Have Disabilities: The Effects on Nursing Students Attitudes. Rehabil Nurs Res.
1995;4:28e32.
28. Tervo RC, Palmer G. Health professional students attitudes towards
people with disability. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:908e915.
29. Beckwith B, Matthews JM. Measurement of attitudes of trainee professionals to people with disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1995;39:
255e262.
30. Stachura K, Garven F. Comparison of occupational therapy and physiotherapy students attitudes towards people with disabilities. Physiotherapy. 2003;89:653e664.
31. Seccombe JA. Attitudes towards disability in an undergraduate
nursing curriculum: a literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;
27:459e465.
32. Marini I. Attitudes toward disability and the psychosocial implications for persons with SCI. SCI Psychosocial Process. 1994;7:
147e152.
33. Shakespeare T, lezzoni LI, Groce NE. Disability and the training of
health professionals. Lancet. 2009;374:1815e1816.
34. Lam WY, Gunukula SK, McGuigan D, et al. Validated instruments
used to measure attitudes of healthcare students and professionals towards patients with physical disability: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;7:55e61.