Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
23
Alpha Center for Engineering Studies and Technology Researches, Amman, Jordan . 2Mechatronics program,.
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Taif University, 888, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Email: salem_farh@yahoo.com
.
Index Term Mechatronics design, Electric vehicle, Electric
Motor, simulink function block model.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Mechatronics systems design is Modern interdisciplinary
design procedure; it is a concurrent selection, evaluation,
integration, and optimization of the system and all its
components as a whole and concurrently, all the design
disciplines work in parallel and collaboratively throughout the
design and development process to produce an overall optimal
design. Mechatronics engineer is expected to design products
with synergy and integration toward constrains like higher
performance, speed, precision, efficiency, lower costs and
functionality, and in order to evaluate concepts generated
during the design process, without building and testing each
one, the mechatronics engineer, also, must be skilled in the
modeling, simulation, analysis, and control of dynamic systems
and understand the key issues in hardware implementation.
The Electric Vehicle, EV, was invented around middle of 19th
century. An EV uses one or more electric or traction motors for
propulsion and can be separated into three groups, based on
how and where the electricity is produced; powered from an
external power station, e.g. trolleybuses, powered by stored
electricity from an off-board generation system e.g. battery
electric vehicles and powered by an on-board electrical
generator such as an internal combustion engine (a hybrid
electric vehicle)[1] the last two groups are shown in Fig. 1. EV
can also be categorized into two groups; big and small electric
vehicles. In this paper we are most interested in design and
control of Small Mechatronics Electric Vehicles, SMEV.
Application examples of SMEV include; golf cars, power chairs
for the disabled, go-karts, home mobile robots, mobility
scooters, sea scooters and tiny quad bikes . A general model
that can be used to simplify and accelerate the mechatronics
design process of SMEV is desired. This paper suggests such
model, we are to develop general mathematical and simulink
models that can be applied in mechatronics design of SMEV,
considering all dynamics, with corresponding optimal control
strategy for desired output response, a general model that can
be used to design, select, integrate, test, analyze and control
SMEV to achieve desired performance.
The EV system consists of two subsystems, the electric motor
and the vehicle systems, the main components of the electric
vehicle (see Fig.1) are an electric machine as drive system,
electrical energy sources, control systems as a central control,
and power converter as a device that converts electrical energy
source with variable needs of the electric vehicle by switching
devices [2]. Meanwhile electric vehicles generally use a battery
as its main energy source [3],[4],[5]. But the batteries on
electric vehicles have a weakness that has the capacity and
service life is limited so that necessary arrangements for
charging batteries do not work hard [2].To drive EV system,
one electric motor can be used or two electric motor each for
each wheel, we will consider the case of one front drive electric
motor used.
The EV system takes input voltage as electric motor input, and
outputs the rotational speed of electric motor or the motion of
electric vehicles, electric motors are capable of generating high
torque at low speed, can operate efficiently over a greater
range of speeds, that is their speeds can be smoothly
controlled and in most cases are reversible, also electric motors
and their features can be tested and analyzed both by control
system design calculation and by MATLAB software, also by
using a simple controller e.g. of PIC micro, with corresponding
program and drive circuit, the rotation of electric motor, that is
the motion of electric vehicles can be controlled easily and
smoothly. The electric actuator most used for SMEV are DC
motors, therefore, the SMEV motion control is simplified to a
DC motor motion control. Controlling the performance of EV, in
particular, smooth driving for comfortable riding, is not a
simple task, where the design and operation parameters of EV,
I J ENS
Electric motor
Controller
Power
converter
Drivers
Mechanical
transmission
Battery charger
Mechanical
coupling
Battery
Tacho
Fig. 1. (a) Architecture of electric vehicle
Electric motor
Controller
Power
converter
Drivers
Mechanical
transmission
Battery charger
Mechanical
coupling
Battery
Tacho
Controller
Battery
Battery charger
Power converter
Fuel tank
Mechanical
transmission
Drivers
Mechanical
coupling
Electric motor
Gasoline en.
II.
24
us Rs i s
j k s
dt
d R
us RR i R
j ( k Pb m ) R
(1)
dt
s Ls i s L i R
R LR i R L i S
I J ENS
Vin Va Vf
, im if ia
V in (s ) R f I a R a I a EMF
V in (s ) I a R f R a EMF
The torque developed in the rotor is:
Tm K * *i K f *i f
Tm Kt *i 2
The back EMF, also, can be expressed as:
EMF Kb * * n Kb (K f * I a )n
Ia
K t m
The DC shunt motor has the same equations for torque as for
the separately excited motor,
A compound wound DC motor is a combination of shunt wound
and series wound configurations as shown in Fig.2(c). This
allows the compound motor to be used in applications where
high starting torque and controlled operating speed are both
required.
The separately excited DC motor (Fig.2(d)) The voltage is
applied to both to field and armature terminals, as shown, there
are two currents, filed current, if and armature current, ia in
order to have linear system, one of these two currents most
held constant, this motor allows having independent control of
both the magnetic flux and the supply voltage, which allows
the required torque at any required angular speed to be set
with great flexibility. The biggest drawback is they are nois y. In
[12] the mathematical model, transfer function and simulink
model of separately excited DC motor were derived and built,
where from Eqs. (1);
The air-gap flux, is proportional to the field current and
given by:
K f *if
2
EMF K* * m V in - Ia Ra
Motor Torque T m K 1 * *i a (t )
From this equation, if the input voltage Vin is kept constant, the
output angular speed is almost inversely proportional to the
square root of the torque, therefore a high torque is obtained at
low speed and a low torque is obtained at high speed. The sum
of the torques must equal zero, we have:
Te T T - TEMF = 0
Substituting the following values, gives :
L mutual * i 2 T Load
, i m if ia
V * Kt
Ra R f
Vin Va Vf
V in (s )
R a R f K b m
2
in
25
d 2
J m 2 bm
dt
0
dt
T m K 1 * K f *i a (t ) * i f (t )
i f (t )
Tm
Tm
K 1 * K f *i a (t ) K b *
T
V in - K* * m R a m
Kb
The torque developed, is given by:
K*
Tm
V in K b n
Ra
The transfer function relating input filed voltage Vin_field(s), and
motor output speed m(s), with armature current ia (t) held
constant and ,given by:
G angle (s )
(s )
V in _ filed (s )
Km
Lf s R f Js b
I J ENS
(s )
V armature (s )
Kt If
Ra R f b
K V
La J 2 La J
s 1 b field
s
R a R f2b
R ab
Ra b
Te
Pe
26
d (t )
di (t )
V in R a i a (t ) La a K b
dt
dt
G speed (s )
Kt
(s )
V in (s )
La s R a J m s bm K t K b
Kt
(s )
7
G speed (s )
V in (s ) (La J m )s 2 (R a J m bm La )s (R abm K t K b )
N
bequiv b m b Load 1 J equiv J m J Load
N2
bh 3
J load
12
8
N1
N2
I J ENS
G speed (s )
robot (s )
V in (s )
Kt / n
(La J equiv )s 2 (R a J equiv bequiv La )s (R abequiv K t K b )
9
The next open loop transfer function, relating the armature
input terminal voltage, Vin(s) to the output terminal voltage of
the tachometer Vtach(s), with most corresponding load torques
applied are considered, is given by:
27
V s
K tach * K t
Gopen (s ) in
V tach s La s R a (J m s bm ) La s R a T K b K t
T=Tload+Tf
For high accuracy, the inertias of the gears and wheels have to
be included in the calculations, this value can be obtained from
literature or calculated using the equations for the inertia of a
cylinder since the gear has a form of cylinder, this can be
rewritten as follows:
N
mr ) 1
N2
V d R * i d Ld
di d
e Lq * i q
dt
di
V q R * i q Lq d e Ld * i d K b m
dt
The equations giving the stator current can be written in the
following form:
Id
Iq
1
V d e Lq * i q
Ld s r
1
V q e Ld * i d K b m
Lq s R
Tm
3K b I q
2
0.5* P (Ld I d I q Lq I d I d )
I J ENS
motor
torque
filed
current
Km
Lf.s+Rf
Step
12 V
Gain
filed
Transfer Fcn
28
PTotal ( F ) * FTotal *
11
Electrical
power
(in
watts)
in
a
DC
circuit
can
be
calculated
by:
Motor
Torque
angular
1
P=
I
x
V
1
speed
Km
1/n
-KLa.s+Ra
Vin
Jequiv.s+bequiv
Where: I is current in Amps and V is voltage. Based on
armature
Armature
.,
rad2mps
motor
gear ratio
linear speed
constant
,
n=3.1 V=W*r1
fundamental principle of dynamics the acceleration of the
1
motor.mat
vehicle is given: by
Field
Lf.s+Rf
current
To File..
P Ptotal
Vin.
field
,.
filed
m
M *
Kb
Where: Pm :The power
available
in the wheels of the vehicle.
Armature
Fig. 3. (b) Simulink model of separately excited DC motor
resistance
M,: vehicle mass
and speed
Table: Parameters of the DC Motor.
1
1/La
The totalsresistiveRa torque, TTotal is the torque of all acting Vf=240[V]
Load
Tload
torque
armature
Current,i
V armature
Armature
inductance
Integrator,
La=0.012[mH]
Twheel G * *T shaft
12
La
Current,i
1
Vin
La.s+Ra
Transfer function
1/(Ls+R)1
Load
torque
Torque
Kt
1/n
angular
speed
-K-
Jequiv.s+bequiv
torque
constant
Transfer function
1/(Js+b)1
Kb
armature
Ra=0.6[W]
This wheel
torqueinductance
provides the resultant driving, tractive force,
1
Cr=29.2[N.m]
Rf
s
F
to
the
vehicle:
Total Integrator.
Lf=120[mH]
Field
Field
Fc=0.0005[N.m.Sec/Rad]
inductance
resistance
TField
G * *T shaft
wheel
inductance.
FTotal
13
r1/Lf
r
Referring to Fig.4, the relationship between the resultant
1
tractive force
andfc the torque produced angular
by the motor Tshaft ,can
s
speed
Integrator.,as: friction
be obtained
coefficient
rCr
T shaft FTotal
* Couple
14
-Kresisting
*
mutual G
Product1
.1
inductance
The vehicle inertia
torque can, also, be defined by the
1/J
following relationship:
Inertia
1/Lf
V Field
Tload
Rf=240[W]
J=1[Kg.m2]
To File..
EMF constant
T JVehicl
d vehicl
dt
r * / G
Fwheel_powertrain
Faerod
=r
F tractive
M*g
Fig. 4. (a)
I J ENS
Road incl.
M*g
g *m
Fig. 4. (b)
Fig. 4. (a)(b) Forces acting on moving vehicle.
15
Where : M : The mass of the SMEV and cargo (Kg). g .Cr The
rolling resistance coefficients is calculated by the following
expression:
3.6
Cr 0.011
robot
100
16
* sign (vehicle )
CD
II.II.III
The aerodynamics lift force, Flift; is caused by
pressure difference between the SMEV's roof and underside,
and is given by:
19
M * g *Cr *cos( ) * rr
18
L * h R *L
M * 0 1
TO
R *T
2
Flift 0.5* * C L * B * vehicle
Trolling
29
Faerod
0.5 2S
20
Fclimb M * g *sin( )
21
22
II.VI The normal force Fnorm: is the force exerted by the road
on the mobile SMEV's tires, the magnitude of Fnorm equals the
magnitude of the Facc in the direction normal to the road, The
normal force Fnorm can be found as by:
Fnorm Fclimb Flift M * g *sin( ) 0.5* *C L * B * 2
23
I J ENS
d
M
dt
T
J
Facc _ angle J
G2
a
2
rwheel
25
K
K
K D s 2 P s I
KD
KD
K
K s K Ps K I
G PID K P I K D D
s
s
s
The transfer function of PID control can be rewritten in terms
of derivative time and integral time to have the form:
2
26
T T s 2 T I s 1
1
G PID K P 1
T D s K P I D
TI s
TI s
G2
G2
*J 2 a J
a
rwheel
rwheel
Where:
30
J
d
FLinear_acc M wheel
2
r
dt
K
K P and
T D is the derivative time D
KP
KI
V C (t ) K P e (t ) K I e (t )dt
0
27
K P s K I
K
Gcurrent (s ) G PI (s ) K P I
s
s
G PI (s ) K PI *
K
K P s I
K P K P s Z o
s
s
(T I s 1)
K PI
TI s
1
* 1
TI s
I J ENS
G Pr efilter (s )
ZO
s Z O
28
G Pr efilter (s )
Z PI
s Z PI
29
31
V in s K b s (s ) La s R a
In practical systems, due to the fact that the electromagnetic
time constant is smaller than electromechanical time constant,
current regulation is faster than speed regulation. Hence,
speed regulation is faster than the variation of back EMF,
therefore, the effect of back EMF on current regulation loop
can be neglected, therefore (32), can be rewritten as
I s
V in s
La s
1
Ra
V in s Telectric s 1
Where : Telectric electrical motor (stator circuit) time constant.
Depending on [15],[16] , the open loop transfer function of
current loop is given by:
Gcurrent _ loop (s )
KP
1
(R aT electric )s (2T s s 1)
G generic (s )
1
2 s ( s 1)
KP
KI
T electric
R aT electric
4T s
Therefore, the current regulator transfer function, PI controller,
is given by:
K I _ current
K P s
K P _ current s K I
K P _ current
G PI _ current (s )
s
s
(T s 1)
1
G PI _ current (s ) K P _ current * I
K P _ current * 1
TI s
T
Is
Where: KP_current: the proportional gain; KI_current: integral gain;
TI: time constant of current regulator. mainly the PI zero, Zo=KI/ KP, will inversely affect the response and it could be
cancelled by prefilter, the required prefilter transfer function to
cancel the zero is given by:
Zo
1 /TI
33
G Pr efilter (s )
s Z o s 1 / T I
KP
I J ENS
K I _
K P _ s
K P _s K I
K P _
G PI _ speed (s )
s
s
(T s 1)
1
G PI _ speed (s ) K P _ *
K P _ * 1
T s
T
s
K P _
32
K
J
K I _ P
2T c
4T c
Where: Tc is the sum time delay due to speed loop, The same
approach, with PI prefilter to cancel the zero, can be applied to
speed loop PI controller.
The inverter: The input voltage Vin to inverter is considered as
constant (36V), the main voltage conversion is done very
efficiently using PWM techniques, the output voltage is
adjustable via the duty cycle ,of the PWM signal. The
transfer function of the inverter can be given as in [6] The PI
current controller is affecting the inverter switching frequency
to reduce the ripples in the torque and current
Gconverter (s )
Speed loop
prefilter
1/T i
1/Tw
s+1/T i
s+1/Tw
S1
Constant1
Constant
Tw.s+1
Kpw
T w.s
Manual Switch
Add,
Speed regulator
PI Controller
,.
Volt(0:36)
Add.1
Kb
K PWM
Ts s 1
Fig. 7. (a)
Kpw
T w.s
-1
.,1
speed
regulator
PI Controller
Fig. 7. (b) T wo PID controllers for both inner current and outer speed
regulations loops.
Kpw
Tw.s+1
T w.s
(speed)
Add
.
Speed
regulator
PI controller
Add.3
Kpi*T i.s+Kpi
Kpwm
T i.s
Ts.s+1
inverter T F .2
current regulator
PI Angular
Controller.1 speed/time
30
20
EMF constant Kb
-K-
m2
Rad/sec
A
30
Kb
20
10
vehicle anglular
feedbacK
Fig. 7. (c) PI controllers for both; inner current and outer speed
-10
0
2
4
6
regulation loops.
sec
Angular speed/time
m2
Rad/sec
0
-10
20
20
m2
30
20
10
10
10
4
6
sec
Acceleration/time
Fig. 8. (a)
30
-10
Acceleration/time
30
-10
4
sec
4 6
sec
Fig. 8. (b)
Fig. 8. 20
(a) linear speed/time and (b) acceleration/time responses of SMEV
using two
10 separate PI controllers for inner current and outer speed loops.
0
-10
4
sec
I J ENS
10
-10
Acceleration/time
30
m2
IV.
SIM ULATION AND RESULTS
The SMEV subsystems; including the electric motor, the
vehicle systems and dynamics considering all acting forces
and control system; all was modeled and coupled, were SMEV
is coupled with the wheel rotational velocity via characteristics
of the electric motor and surface and both coupled with control
systems. The simulink model is shown in Fig. 6. Three control
strategies are introduced; first strategy controlling both loops;
current and speed loops with two separate PID controllers for
each, second strategy, controlling the whole system with one
PID controller and third strategy controlling both loops;
current and speed loops with two separate PI controllers for
each current and speed loop. The simulation of these
strategies are shown in Fig.7(a)(b)(c), For our design and
simulation, the desired output max linear speed is to be 23 m/s,
(that is 82.8 km/h)
Running simulink model applying two separate PI controllers,
one for inner current regulation and other for outer speed
regulation will result in linear speed/time curve shown in Fig. 8
, adding PI controllers prefilter to simulink block, will eliminate
the affect of PI zeros on the response, resulting in more
Nm
Rad/sec
200
50
100
0
International Journal
of Mechanical & Mechatronics
Engineering IJMME-IJENS Vol:13 No:01
0
-50
-100
10
5
sec (s)
10
Amp
M/s
1000
5
sec (s)
Linear speed/time
23m/s Current/time
(82.8 km/h), and tuning ,will return response curves
30
1000
shown in Fig. 13(a). Now, keeping same arrangement (PI and
20
PD controller) but switching input signal to motion profile will
10
500
return response curves shown in Fig. 13(b). Response curves
0
show that using PI controller for inner current loop and PD for
-10
0 outer speed loop, will result in system response without
0
5
10
0
5
10
sec (s)
(s)
overshootsecand
in smooth driving for comfortable riding, as well
Fig. 9(a)
Fig. 9(b)
as settling time is about 1.8 seconds
Fig. 9. (a)(b) T wo linear speed/time of SMEV response curves using two
Switching the general model, to PI control with prefilter for
PID controllers for current and speed regulations loops, obtained for
both , inner and outer, loops, considering that the time
different values of PID gains.
constants (speed gain Kpw=3.3,
speed time constant
Current/time
Linear speed/time
30
Tw=0.009 , current regulator and current prefilter values Kpi =
1.51, time constant Ti=0.08, and inverter time constant
20
Ts=0.0025, Kpwm=5), Running model for desired output linear
10
speed of 23m/s ( 82.8 km/h), will return response curves shown
in Fig. 14 , settling time is about 5.3 seconds , the performance
0
of SMEV is controlled desired response that is with smooth
-10
driving for comfortable riding,
2
4
6
0
2
4
6
Time (seconds)
Time (seconds)
The proposed model can be modified, where only the electric
Torque/time
Angular speed/time
Fig. 10. linear speed/time
motor can be replaced with different types of electric motors
100 of SMEV using one PID controller for whole
SMEV system.
most used for EV, also with different electric motors, it is
50
necessary to use different control strategies, model can be
V. A SUGGEST ED FUNCTION BLOCK WIT H IT S FUNCT ION
modified to include PI with dead beat response and IMC
BLOCK WIT H0 IT 'S PARAMET ERS WINDOW FOR
control.
Linear speed/time
Angular speed/time
M ECHAT RONICS SMEV DESIGN, T EST ING AND VALIDAT ING.
30
100
To simplify and accelerate
Mechatronics design process of
-50
2
4
6
0
2
4
6
20
SMEV
in terms of most mechanical
components and control
Time
(seconds)
Time (seconds)
50
system selection and integration, a function block with its
10
function block parameters window is proposed, shown in Fig.
0
0
11, , this function block can be used as follows: using
supporting m.file , designer is to define form, dimensions and
-10
-50
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
weight of required SMEV, define required variables and
Seconds (s)
Seconds (s)
coefficients for calculating acting forces e.g. CD, CL A, also
linear acceleration m/sec 2
Torque/time
150
1000
selected controller and its corresponding gains and/or zeros,
100
use manual switch to switch between controller types, PI,PD,
500
PI with prefilter, PID for the whole system , one PID for current
50
loop and other PID for speed loop, one PI for inner current
0
0
loop and other PD for outer speed loop, finally run the
suggested model with defined parameters, analyze, evaluate
-50
-500
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
and decide.
Seconds (s)
Seconds (s)
M/s
1500
33
500
600
-200
VI.
Torque Nm
200
lin. speed M
Rad/sec
400
Acceler. m/sec 2
I J ENS
Kpw
-50
-5
2
4
Seconds (s)
2
4
Seconds (s)
100
Linear speed/time
2
4
Seconds (s)
2
4
Seconds (s)
100
Torque Nm
20
10
0
2
4
Seconds (s)
lin. speed M
2
4
Seconds (s)
Add,
,.
15
Angular speed/time
50
10
4
6
Seconds (s)
-50
4
6
Seconds (s)
Torque/time
20
300
10
50
-10
0
-50
2
4
Seconds (s)
4
6
Seconds (s)
200
100
0
-100
Kpi*Ti.s+Kpi
Kpwm
Tw.s
Ti.s
Ts.s+1
La.s+Ra
current regulator
PI Controller.2
inverter TF .
,,
Add.1
4
6
Seconds (s)
Tw.s+1
Speed regulator
PI Controller
Load
Dynamics
Kpw
5
10
Seconds (s)
100
input (0:36)
Torque/time
150
-50
15
20
-10
30
-10
5
10
Seconds (s)
20
-20
50
Linear speed/time
Torque/time
30
40
Rad
lin. speed M
-10
15
Angular speed/time
60
10
5
10
Seconds (s)
100
0
-100
-20
15
-5
-10
5
10
Seconds (s)
10
200
Torque Nm
m
0
15
300
10
Torque/time
20
Torque Nm
2
4
Seconds (s)
20
Torque Nm
Rad
40
Rad
Rad
lin. speed M
50
10
.
sp
Angular speed/time
10
lin. speed M
100
20
-10
Linear speed/time
Angular speed/time
30
34
-K-
-K-
1/n
angular
linear speed.
speed
-K-
den(s)
Kt.
gear ratio
Transfer function n=3.1
1/(Js+b).
rad2mps
V=W*r1
Kb
-K-
EMF constant Kb
I J ENS
35
aerodaynamic torque,
0.5*p*A*Cd*v^1
Divide31
Divide45
Divide46
Cd
CL
,1
. 0.5
r/2
.1
SinCos.1
Cd=0.1
Cd
12
Divide47
Divide35
Derivative,1
Divide48
Divide49
0.5
-K-
r*m*g/2 , correct2
r^2*m*g/1
du/dt
r^2m/2. correct2
r*m/2
wheel radius,
V=W*r2
Divide50
PI or PID (Inner current) 3
Current PI Prefilter 18
Speed PI Prefilter 17
INNER controller
output
Divide23
Divide20
Coloum friction
Divide24
4 Current, I
16 Inverter
L, Armature
Inductance
Kt, Torque
10
constant
11
Divide1
r, wheel radius
T, Torque, 2
1
Vin, Input Volt,(0 :30)
current
d1
d2
10
10
7
Torque
Divide,2
rads2mps=
R_wheel*(2*pi)/(2*pi).1
du/dt
Derivative1
den(s)
Divide41
Divide39 Integrator1
Transfer function
1/(Js+b).
1
Divide40
angular
speed
Saturation
1
s
linear speed
in m/s
Acceleration
in m/(s^2)
Divide19
8
R, Armature Resistance
9
Divide42
7 All viscous damping
Divide36
n, Gear ratio
5
6
Ktac, Tachometer constant ,
acceleration
Signal 1
Signal Builder
Speed regulator
PI Controller
Acceleration in m/(s^2)
electic_vehicl1.mat
Subsystem1
Tw.s+1
Kpw
,1
Vin, Input Volt,(0 :30)
Out1
T orque
T w.s
.,
-C-
1
PID(s)
T, Torque,
electic_vehicl2.mat
B3
n, Gear ratio
,2
Angular speed
PID speed
n
Ktach
current regulator
PI Controller.
-C-
Ktach
Kpi*T i.s+Kpi
La
T i.s
Ra
Ra
PID(s)
electic_vehicl3.mat
B4
L, Armature Inductance
Current ,3
La
R, Armature Resistance
Kt
electic_vehicl4.mat
Kt
PID current
Current, I
r, wheel radius
linear speed in m/s
,4
Linear speed
9.8
inverter T F .
g
Kpwm
electic_vehicl5.mat
CL
Ts.s+1
Cl
Speed loop
prefilter
B
B
1/Tw
s+1/Tw
Speed PI Pref ilter
Current loop
Prefilter
1/T i
s+1/T i
-CKb, EMF
Cd
3
A
Cd
Rou, air
Cr
0
Cr
Road slope
Out1
Subsystem
Subsystem3
Fig. 11. (b) Function block with its function block with it's parameters window for SMEV design, testing and validating
1310701-5252-IJMME-IJENS February 2013 IJENS
I J ENS
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
36
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
Authors Profile:ta
Farhan Atallah Salem : B.Sc., M.Sc
and Ph.D., in Mechatronics of
production systems, Moscow state
Academy. He is author and co-author of
textbooks and scientific papers in
Refereed Journals. Now he is ass.
Professor
in
T aif
University,
Mechatronics program, Dept. of
Mechanical Engineering and gendirector of alpha center for engineering
studies and technology researches.
Research Interests; Design, modeling
and analysis of primary Mechatronics Machines, Control selection,
design and analysis for Mechatronics systems. Rotor Dynamics and
Design for Mechatronics applications
I J ENS