Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
1986 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Between
States and I.O. or Between I.O.
2. Definition of treaty (Art. 2(1)(a))
International agreement
Concluded between subjects of international law (States and
I.O.) >< State contracts
In written form >< oral agreement
Governed by international law (shall)
>< MOU = political agreement (will)
>< governed by national law
Embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related
instruments
Whatever its particular designation
3. Conclusion of treaties
A. Internal aspects
Municipal law determines organ(s) having treaty-making
power
2. International aspects
Negotiations (full powers, Art. 7)
Adoption of the text (Art. 9)
Brussels School of International Studies
Law of Treaties (2005-2006)
6. Treaty interpretation
General rule of interpretation (Art. 31)
Supplementary means of interpretation (Art. 32) : travaux
prparatoires (preparatory work) of the treaty and
circumstances of its conclusion
Interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more
languages (Art. 33)
7. Third States
General rule : pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt (a treaty
does not create either obligations or rights for a third State
without its consent) (Art. 34)
Treaties providing for obligations for third States (Art. 35)
Treaties providing for rights for third States (Art. 36)
8. Amendment and modification
Amendment (Art. 40)
Modification : modifying agreement inter se (Art. 41)
9. Invalidity of treaties : grounds of invalidity
A. Incapacity of a party (?)
States: Art. 6 of 1969 Vienna Convention (full capacity)
I.O.: Art. 6 of 1986 Vienna Convention (principle of
speciality). Quid Art. 46 (2)?
B. Vitiation of consent (defective intention)
Incompetence of an agent
The 1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties adopts the principle of continuance,
excepted if 1) the States concerned otherwise agreed (contrary agreement); 2) the application of the treaty in
respect of the successor State would be incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty; or if 3) the
application of the treaty in respect of the successor State would radically change the conditions for its operation
(cf. rebus sic stantibus). However, State practice and the practice of depositaries adopt the principle of
discontinuance, excepted if the States concerned otherwise agreed (contrary agreement).
2
Idem.