Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Cytokine
journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/cytokine
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 September 2014
Received in revised form 24 January 2015
Accepted 28 January 2015
Available online 9 March 2015
Keywords:
Cutaneous lupus erythematous
Ultraviolet light
Interferon
Interleukin
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
a b s t r a c t
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an inammatory disease with a broad range of cutaneous
manifestations that may be accompanied by systemic symptoms. The pathogenesis of CLE is complex,
multifactorial and incompletely dened. Below we review the current understanding of the cytokines
involved in these processes. Ultraviolet (UV) light plays a central role in the pathogenesis of CLE, triggering keratinocyte apoptosis, transport of nucleoprotein autoantigens to the keratinocyte cell surface and
the release of inammatory cytokines (including interferons (IFNs), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-17). Increased IFN, particularly type I IFN, is central to the development of CLE lesions. In CLE, type I IFN is produced in response to nuclear antigens, immune complexes
and UV light. Type I IFN increases leukocyte recruitment to the skin via inammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, thereby inducing a cycle of cutaneous inammation. Increased TNFa in CLE
may also cause inammation. However, decreasing TNFa with an anti-TNFa agent can induce CLE-like
lesions. TNFa regulates B cells, increases the production of inammatory molecules and inhibits the production of IFN-a. An increase in the inammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17 and IL-18 and a
decrease in the anti-inammatory cytokine IL-12 also act to amplify inammation in CLE. Specic gene
mutations may increase the levels of these inammatory cytokines in some CLE patients. New drugs targeting various aspects of these cytokine pathways are being developed to treat CLE and systemic lupus
erythematosus (SLE).
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and chronic CLE (CCLE)
[2]. ACLE most commonly presents with erythematous macules
and papules classically in a malar (buttery) distribution along
with positive antinuclear, anti-double stranded deoxyribonucleic
acid (dsDNA) and anti-Smith (Sm) antibodies. ACLE is often associated with systemic symptoms. SCLE presents with annular or
papulosquamous morphologies. Patients with SCLE are highly photosensitive. Seventy percent of SCLE patients have anti-Ro/SSA
antibodies, 7080% have antinuclear antibodies and 5% have antidsDNA antibodies [3,4]. Fifty percent of SCLE patients meet criteria
for SLE, although they often have mild SLE symptoms [5]. CCLE
includes tumid lupus, lupus panniculitis, chilblain lupus and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). CCLE patients, less frequently
those with localized discoid lupus and tumid lupus, develop SLE,
but when they meet SLE criteria it is frequently with non-organthreatening criteria [6]. However, patients with SLE can develop
CCLE-type lesions. Patients with CCLE rarely have positive
antinuclear, anti-dsDNA or anti-Sm antibodies. They may have
low-titer anti-Ro/SSA antibodies [7]. In addition to the LE-specic
lesions of ACLE, SCLE and CCLE described above, Gilliam and
327
63% of SCLE, 60% of SLE and 45% of DLE subjects developed skin
lesions after exposure to UV irradiation [12]. Forty-two percent
of lesions were induced by UVB alone and 34% by UVA alone. In
the patients irradiated with combined UVA and UVB, 53% developed skin lesions.
UV light produces CLE lesions through multiple pathways. UV
light induces cytokine and chemokine production, keratinocyte
apoptosis and necrosis, expression of autoantigens on keratinocytes, recruitment of activated immune cells and increased
antibody binding to keratinocytes (Table 1). Through these actions
UV light causes CLE lesions and can aggravate systemic symptoms
in SLE.
Table 1
The role of UV light in the pathogenesis of CLE. CCL27 = Chemokine (CC motif) ligand
27. CLE = Cutaneous lupus erythematosus. IFN = Interferon. IL = Interleukin.
TNFa = Tumor necrosis factor-a. UV = Ultraviolet.
Potential
CLE
pathogenic
factors
Primary
source(s)
Primary function
UV light
Sun
Articial
lights
Proinammatory
Increases production of
inammatory
cytokines
and chemokines such as
IFN, TNFa, IL and CCL27,
which recruit activated
immune cells and cause
tissue inammation
Triggers
keratinocyte
apoptosis and necrosis
Increases expression of
autoantigens
on
keratinocytes and antibody
binding to keratinocytes
328
These studies describe multiple mechanisms for increased keratinocyte apoptosis in CLE.
There may also be impaired clearance of these apoptotic cells in
CLE. In one study, a high number of apoptotic keratinocytes were
still present in CLE lesions 72 h after UV-irradiation, while in
healthy control skin the apoptotic cells which were visible at
24 h had signicantly decreased by 72 h [20]. This accumulation
of apoptotic keratinocytes can result in secondary necrosis, and
the release of proinammatory cytokines and potential autoantigens [21]. However, other studies found that the number of apoptotic cells, clearance rate of apoptotic cells and level of secondary
necrosis after UV irradiation were not signicantly different in
the skin of SLE patients compared to controls [22,23].
3.4. UV light-induced autoantigens
Keratinocyte apoptosis and necrosis as well as UV irradiation
alone increase the presence of autoantigens in the skin. Both UV
irradiation and keratinocyte apoptosis increase the translocation
of nucleoproteins via blebs to the keratinocyte surface. These
nucleoproteins include CLE-associated autoantigens such as Ro/
SSA (Ro52 and Ro60) [24]. High-mobility group protein B1
(HMGB1), a proinammatory and immunogenic cytokine, is also
released from apoptotic or necrotic keratinocytes and acts as an
autoantigen [25,26]. These autoantigens are then targeted by
autoantibodies, resulting in the release of additional cytokines
and skin inammation [27]. Minimizing sun exposure and
maximizing sun protection are critical in the treatment of LE to
block the multiple UV-induced inammatory pathways.
4. Interferon
4.1. Key points
Increased IFN, especially type I IFN, plays an important role in
the pathogenesis of CLE.
In CLE, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) produce type I IFN in
response to nuclear antigens, immune complexes and UV light.
Type I IFN increases leukocyte recruitment to the skin via
inammatory cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules.
Type I IFN also upregulates the production of cytotoxic proteins.
In total, these actions induce and propagate cutaneous
inammation.
Mutations in the IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), tyrosine kinase 2
(TYK2) and three prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1) genes
increase type I IFN production in some people with CLE.
Like type I IFN, type II IFN increases the production of chemokines and adhesion molecules that recruit inammatory cells into
the skin. Type II IFN also increases the production of TNFa.
Increased levels of type II IFN are found in SLE. Type II IFNs role
in CLE is unclear.
Increased type III IFN in the lesions and serum of CLE subjects
points to a potential role for this cytokine in the pathogenesis
of CLE. Like the other types of IFN, type III IFN increases the production of inammatory cytokines.
Many new drugs are being developed to treat CLE and SLE that
target various aspects of the IFN pathway.
IFNs are important modulators of the immune system.
Increased IFN production was rst identied as a central factor in
the pathogenesis of lupus in 1979 [28]. IFN-a and IFN-b are classied as type I IFNs, while IFN-c is a type II IFN. Type I IFN is involved
in the early activation of innate and adaptive immunity as well as
autoimmunity. It has wide-ranging effects including: stimulating
proliferation and differentiation of B cells into plasma cells, and
monocytes into antigen presenting cells; activating the Th1 pathway; stimulating dendritic cells; suppressing regulatory T cells;
and modifying cytokine effects. Type II IFN inhibits viral replication
to ght infections, activates macrophages, monocytes and tumor
surveillance, and both stimulates and modulates inammation.
Increased IFN, particularly type I IFN, plays an important role in
the development of cutaneous inammation in CLE (Table 2).
4.2. Type I interferon
Type I IFN is elevated in the serum and lesional skin of lupus
patients. In CLE, pDCs residing in the dermis are the primary type
I IFN producing cells. PDCs produce type I IFN in response to nuclear antigens released through apoptosis or necrosis and to autoantibodies in immune complexes (such as anti-dsDNA and anti-U1ribonucleoprotein [RNP] antibodies) via the toll-like receptor
(TLR) 7 or TLR9 as well as through TLR-independent mechanisms
[29]. TLR7 and TLR9 are expressed on pDCs. Other stimulating factors for type I IFN remain poorly dened, but include UV light,
medications, trauma and infection.
IFN-a is composed of 13 subtypes with pleiotropic functions.
IFN-a binds the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR) to activate Janus-activated kinases (JAKs) including TYK2 and JAK1. JAK phosphorylates
signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 1 and
STAT2, which form a complex with other factors. This complex
translocates into the nucleus to initiate gene transcription of IFNstimulated genes. These genes increase IFN signaling, rapidly stimulate further cytokine release and increase leukocyte recruitment into the skin (including memory T cells, cytotoxic T cells
and pDCs) via the proinammatory chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10
and CXCL11 [16].
In particular, CXCL9 on dendritic cells and endothelial cells of the
supercial dermal plexus as well as CXCL10 in the basal epidermis
and perivascular leukocytes recruit chemokine (CXC motif) receptor
Table 2
The role of interferon (IFN) in the pathogenesis of CLE. CD95 = Cluster of differentiation 95. CLE = Cutaneous lupus erythematosus. CXCL = Chemokine (CXC motif)
ligand. IFN = Interferon. JAK = Janus-activated kinase. NK = Natural killer.
pDC = Plasmacytoid dendritic cell. STAT = Signal transducers and activators of transcription. Th1 = T-helper 1. TNFa = Tumor necrosis factor-a. TRAIL = TNF-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand.
Potential
CLE
pathogenic
factors
Primary
source(s)
Primary function
Type I IFN
pDCs
Proinammatory
Type II IFN
Th1 cells NK
cells
Proinammatory
Keratinocytes
Proinammatory
Activates transcription
of type I IFN-stimulated genes via the JAK/
STAT pathway, which
recruit leukocytes to
the skin via inammatory
cytokines,
chemokines
(particularly CXCL9 and
CXCL10) and adhesion
molecules
Increases the level of
cytotoxic
proteins
(perforin and granzyme B) and mediators
of
apoptosis
(CD95 and TRAIL)
Enhances production
of TNFa, inammatory
chemokines and adhesion molecules
Increases the level of
the inammatory chemokine CXCL9
329
TRAIL
Smulated
pDC
TRAIL R1 receptor
IFN-
Keranocyte
Apoptoc cell
Fig. 1. IFN-a induced apoptosis via TRAIL in the skin in CLE. IFN = interferon. pDC = plasmacytoid dendritic cell. TRAIL = TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.
330
[46,47]. The clinical studies of rontalizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 anti-IFN-a monoclonal antibody, found a signicant
decrease in IFN-regulated gene expression in whole blood-derived
RNA, but not in anti-dsDNA antibody levels [48]. The primary endpoint of the phase II study for rontalizumab, the British Isles Lupus
Assessment Group (BILAG) response index, was not signicantly
different between the treatment and placebo groups [49].
Amgens drug AMG 811, an anti-IFN-c monoclonal antibody, is also
currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of SLE.
Table 3
The role of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNFa) in the pathogenesis of CLE.
CCL = Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand. CLE = Cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
CXCL = Chemokine (CXC motif) ligand. ICAM-1 = Intracellular adhesion molecule 1.
IFN = Interferon. IL = Interleukin. pDC = Plasmacytoid dendritic cell. TNFa = Tumor
necrosis factor-a. VCAM-1 = Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.
Potential
CLE
pathogenic
factors
Primary
source(s)
Primary function
TNFa
Keratinocytes
Fibroblasts
Mast cells
Proinammatory
and antiinammatory
keratinocytes and the binding of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies to keratinocytes [62,63]. These ndings emphasize multiple potential
roles for TNFa in the pathogenesis of CLE.
Increased levels of TNFa have been found in many studies of
CLE and SLE patients. Refractory skin lesions in SCLE, the most photosensitive type of lupus, are strongly positive for TNFa in the epidermis [52]. The prevalence of the
308A TNFa promoter
polymorphism, which is associated with increased TNFa production, is higher in SCLE compared to healthy controls [50].
Circulating levels of TNFa are elevated in SLE and the levels of
the TNF soluble receptors (TNF-sR) TNF-sR55 and TNF-sR75 correlate with the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) index [64].
One study though had contradictory ndings with increased TNFa
levels in patients with inactive SLE (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI] 6 2) compared to patients with
very active SLE (SLEDAI P 13) and control patients, possibly suggesting that TNFa is a protective factor in SLE [65].
Despite this evidence for the inuence of increased TNFa in the
pathogenesis of LE, medications that inhibit TNFa and TNFas
actions also induce lupus. One study reported the incidence of
TNFa inhibitor-induced lupus to be 0.93% (25/2682) for iniximab,
0.81% (9/1110) for adalimumab and 0.37% (5/1360) for etanercept
[66]. Anti-TNFa agents can produce a myriad of systemic symptoms
and cutaneous symptoms equivalent to those found in idiopathic LE
such as fever, arthritis and rashes. TNFa inhibitors can also induce
lupus antibodies. Positive anti-dsDNA antibodies were found in
20% of iniximab, 1012% of adalimumab, 15% of etanercept and
4% of certolizumab pegol treated patients who had previously tested negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies [67]. Antiphospholipid antibodies may also be present in TNFa inhibitor-induced lupus. Antihistone antibodies are found in some types of drug-induced lupus,
but are uncommon in TNFa inhibitor-induced lupus.
In cases of TNFa inhibitor-induced lupus, once the offending
TNFa inhibitor causing lupus-like symptoms is stopped the patient
usually improves over days to weeks with antibodies normalizing
over months. Treatment with topical steroids, topical non-steroidal
immunomodulators or oral antimalarials may be needed. Rarely,
systemic steroids or steroid-sparing agents must be used.
331
332
Table 4
The role of interleukin (IL) in the pathogenesis of CLE. CCL = Chemokine (CC motif)
ligand. CD = Cluster of differentiation. CLE = Cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
CXCL = Chemokine (CXC motif) ligand. IFN = Interferon. IL = Interleukin. Th1 = Thelper 1 cell. Th17 = T-helper 17 cell. TNFa = Tumor necrosis factor-a.
UV = Ultraviolet.
Potential
CLE
pathogenic
factors
Primary
source(s)
Primary function
IL-1
Keratinocytes
Proinammatory
IL-6
Keratinocytes
Proinammatory
and antiinammatory
IL-10
B cells
Monocytes
CD4 + T cells
CD8 + T cells
Proinammatory
and antiinammatory
IL-12
B cells
Dendritic
cells
Macrophages
Antiinammatory
IL-17
Th17 cells
Proinammatory
IL-18
Macrophages
Proinammatory
Amplies production
of TNFa and the
inammatory
chemokines
CCL5,
CCL20, CCL22 and
CXCL8
Triggers
B
cell
maturation
and
immunoglobulin
secretion
Increases cytotoxic T
cell production and
differentiation
Suppresses Th1 cells,
macrophages
and
dendritic cells
Stimulates
B
cell
hyperactivity
Regulates
T
cell
function
Reduces immunoglobulin production
Protects
keratinocytes from UVinduced apoptosis
Stimulates T cells
Increases the production of autoantibodies
Triggers the production of inammatory
cytokines
and
chemokines including
IL-1, IL-6, CCL2, CCL7,
CCL20, CXCL1 and
CXCL5
Stimulates the production of the inammatory
cytokines
IFN-c, TNFa and IL-1b
Potentiates IFN-c-induced production of
CXCL9, CXCL10 and
CXCL11
7. Conclusions
Many studies point to cytokines as important factors in the
pathogenesis of CLE. IFNs, TNFa and ILs all play signicant roles.
The actions and interactions of these cytokines in CLE are complex.
The cytokine pathways are impacted by UV light, genetic and other
environmental factors. They are further complicated in that they
may vary with CLE subtype. Current research is continuing to
expand our knowledge of these pathways and identify potential
targets for the treatment of CLE.
Acknowledgements
This material is supported by the Veterans Health
Administration, Ofce of Research and Development, Biomedical
Laboratory Research and Development and a VA Merit Review grant
to VPW.
References
[1] Durosaro O, Davis MD, Reed KB, Rohlinger AL. Incidence of cutaneous lupus
erythematosus, 19652005: a population-based study. Arch Dermatol
2009;145(3):24953.
[2] Gilliam JN, Sontheimer RD. Distinctive cutaneous subsets in the spectrum of
lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981;4(4):4715.
[3] Tebbe B, Mansmann U, Wollina U, et al. Markers in cutaneous lupus
erythematosus indicating systemic involvement. A multicenter study on 296
patients. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1997;77(4):3058.
[4] Lee LA, Werth VP. Lupus Erythematosus. In: JL B, editor. Dermatology. 3rd ed.
London: Elsevier Ltd; 2012, p. 601.
[5] Cohen MR, Crosby D. Systemic disease in subacute cutaneous lupus
erythematosus: a controlled comparison with systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Rheumatol 1994;21(9):16659.
[6] Wieczorek IT, Propert KJ, Okawa J, Werth VP. Systemic symptoms in the
progression of cutaneous to systemic lupus erythematosus. JAMA Dermatol
2014;150(3):2916.
[7] Lee LA, Roberts CM, Frank MB, McCubbin VR, Reichlin M. The autoantibody
response to Ro/SSA in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol
1994;130(10):12628.
[8] Klein R, Moghadam-Kia S, Taylor L, et al. Quality of life in cutaneous lupus
erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64(5):84958.
[9] Chang AY, Ghazi E, Okawa J, Werth VP. Quality of life differences between
responders and nonresponders in the treatment of cutaneous lupus
erythematosus. JAMA Dermatol 2013;149(1):1046.
[10] Freutel S, Gaffal E, Zahn S, Bieber T, Tuting T, Wenzel J. Enhanced CCR5+/CCR3+
T helper cell ratio in patients with active cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Lupus 2011;20(12):13004.
[11] Ullrich SE. Does exposure to UV radiation induce a shift to a Th-2-like immune
reaction? Photochem Photobiol 1996;64(2):2548.
[12] Kuhn A, Sonntag M, Richter-Hintz D, et al. Phototesting in lupus
erythematosus: a 15-year experience. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45(1):8695.
[13] Kock A, Schwarz T, Kirnbauer R, et al. Human keratinocytes are a source for
tumor necrosis factor alpha: evidence for synthesis and release upon
stimulation with endotoxin or ultraviolet light. J Exp Med
1990;172(6):160914.
[14] Takashima A, Bergstresser PR. Impact of UVB radiation on the epidermal
cytokine network. Photochem Photobiol 1996;63(4):397400.
[15] Kuhn A, Sontheimer RD. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: molecular and
cellular basis of clinical ndings. Curr Direct Autoimmunity 2008;10:11940.
[16] Meller S, Winterberg F, Gilliet M, et al. Ultraviolet radiation-induced injury,
chemokines, and leukocyte recruitment: an amplication cycle triggering
cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(5):150416.
[17] Norris DA, Whang K, David-Bajar K, Bennion SD. The inuence of ultraviolet
light on immunological cytotoxicity in the skin. Photochem Photobiol
1997;65(4):63646.
[18] Chung JH, Kwon OS, Eun HC, et al. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis of cutaneous
lupus erythematosus. Am J Dermatopathol 1998;20(3):23341.
[19] Zhang M, Zhang Y, Wang L, Li F. [Expression of Fas and Fas ligand in lesions of
patients with discoid lupus erythematosus]. Hua xi yi ke da xue xue
bao = Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences = Huaxi yike
daxue xuebao/[bian ji zhe, Hua xi yi ke da xue xue bao bian wei hui].
December 2001;32(4):513515.
[20] Kuhn A, Herrmann M, Kleber S, et al. Accumulation of apoptotic cells in the
epidermis of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus after ultraviolet
irradiation. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54(3):93950.
[21] Munoz LE, Lauber K, Schiller M, Manfredi AA, Herrmann M. The role of
defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity. Nat Rev
Rheumatol 2010;6(5):2809.
[22] Reefman E, de Jong MC, Kuiper H, et al. Is disturbed clearance of apoptotic
keratinocytes responsible for UVB-induced inammatory skin lesions in
systemic lupus erythematosus? Arthrit Res Therapy 2006;8(6):R156.
[23] Reefman E, Kuiper H, Jonkman MF, Limburg PC, Kallenberg CG, Bijl M. Skin
sensitivity to UVB irradiation in systemic lupus erythematosus is not related to
the level of apoptosis induction in keratinocytes. Rheumatology
2006;45(5):53844.
[24] Oke V, Vassilaki I, Espinosa A, et al. High Ro52 expression in spontaneous and
UV-induced cutaneous inammation. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129(8):
200010.
[25] Barkauskaite V, Ek M, Popovic K, Harris HE, Wahren-Herlenius M, Nyberg F.
Translocation of the novel cytokine HMGB1 to the cytoplasm and extracellular
space coincides with the peak of clinical activity in experimentally UVinduced
lesions
of
cutaneous
lupus
erythematosus.
Lupus
2007;16(10):794802.
[26] Urbonaviciute V, Furnrohr BG, Meister S, et al. Induction of inammatory and
immune responses by HMGB1-nucleosome complexes: implications for the
pathogenesis of SLE. J Exp Med 2008;205(13):300718.
[27] Caricchio R, McPhie L, Cohen PL. Ultraviolet B radiation-induced cell death:
critical role of ultraviolet dose in inammation and lupus autoantigen
redistribution. J Immunol 2003;171(11):577886.
[28] Hooks JJ, Moutsopoulos HM, Geis SA, Stahl NI, Decker JL, Notkins AL. Immune
interferon in the circulation of patients with autoimmune disease. New
England J Med 1979;301(1):58.
333
[54] Fujisawa H, Wang B, Kondo S, Shivji GM, Sauder DN. Costimulation with
ultraviolet B and interleukin-1 alpha dramatically increase tumor necrosis
factor-alpha production in human dermal broblasts. J Interferon Cytokine
Res: Ofc J Int Soc Interferon Cytokine Res 1997;17(5):30713.
[55] Bashir MM, Sharma MR, Werth VP. UVB and proinammatory cytokines
synergistically activate TNF-alpha production in keratinocytes through
enhanced gene transcription. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129(4):9941001.
[56] Wang D, Drenker M, Eiz-Vesper B, Werfel T, Wittmann M. Evidence for a
pathogenetic role of interleukin-18 in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.
Arthritis Rheum 2008;58(10):320515.
[57] Fisher GJ, Datta SC, Talwar HS, et al. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature
skin ageing and retinoid antagonism. Nature 1996;379(6563):3359.
[58] Bazzoni F, Kruys V, Shakhov A, Jongeneel CV, Beutler B. Analysis of tumor
necrosis factor promoter responses to ultraviolet light. J Clin Investig
1994;93(1):5662.
[59] Bashir MM, Sharma MR, Werth VP. TNF-alpha production in the skin. Arch
Dermatol Res 2009;301(1):8791.
[60] Wang B, Fujisawa H, Zhuang L, et al. Depressed Langerhans cell migration and
reduced contact hypersensitivity response in mice lacking TNF receptor p75. J
Immunol 1997;159(12):614855.
[61] Palucka AK, Blanck JP, Bennett L, Pascual V, Banchereau J. Cross-regulation of
TNF and IFN-alpha in autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
2005;102(9):33727.
[62] Gerl V, Hostmann B, Johnen C, et al. The intracellular 52-kd Ro/SSA
autoantigen in keratinocytes is up-regulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha
via tumor necrosis factor receptor I. Arthrit Rheum 2005;52(2):5318.
[63] Dorner T, Hucko M, Mayet WJ, Trefzer U, Burmester GR, Hiepe F. Enhanced
membrane expression of the 52 kDa Ro(SS-A) and La(SS-B) antigens by human
keratinocytes induced by TNF alpha. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54(11):9049.
[64] Gabay C, Cakir N, Moral F, et al. Circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor
soluble receptors in systemic lupus erythematosus are signicantly higher
than in other rheumatic diseases and correlate with disease activity. J
Rheumatol 1997;24(2):3038.
[65] Gomez D, Correa PA, Gomez LM, Cadena J, Molina JF, Anaya JM. Th1/Th2
cytokines in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: is tumor necrosis
factor alpha protective? Semin Arthrit Rheum 2004;33(6):40413.
[66] Moulis G, Sommet A, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL, on behalf of the
Association Francaise des Centres Regionaux de P. Is the risk of tumour
necrosis factor inhibitor-induced lupus or lupus-like syndrome the same with
monoclonal antibodies and soluble receptor? A case/non-case study in a
nationwide pharmacovigilance database. Rheumatology 2014. Jun 4.
[67] Kerbleski JF, Gottlieb AB. Dermatological complications and safety of anti-TNF
treatments. Gut 2009;58(8):10339.
[68] Aringer M, Smolen JS. Efcacy and safety of TNF-blocker therapy in systemic
lupus erythematosus. Exp Opin Drug Safety 2008;7(4):4119.
[69] McCarthy EM, Smith S, Lee RZ, et al. The association of cytokines with disease
activity and damage scores in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.
Rheumatology 2014. Apr 4.
[70] Urbanski A, Schwarz T, Neuner P, et al. Ultraviolet light induces increased
circulating interleukin-6 in humans. J Invest Dermatol 1990;94(6):
80811.
[71] Wozniacka A, Lesiak A, Boncela J, Smolarczyk K, McCauliffe DP, SysaJedrzejowska A. The inuence of antimalarial treatment on IL-1beta, IL-6
and TNF-alpha mRNA expression on UVB-irradiated skin in systemic lupus
erythematosus. British J Dermatol 2008;159(5):112430.
[72] Mellor-Pita S, Citores MJ, Castejon R, et al. Monocytes and T lymphocytes
contribute to a predominance of interleukin 6 and interleukin 10 in systemic
lupus erythematosus. Cytomet. Part B, Clin Cytomet 2009;76(4):26170.
[73] Chun HY, Chung JW, Kim HA, et al. Cytokine IL-6 and IL-10 as biomarkers in
systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Immunol 2007;27(5):4616.
[74] Grondal G, Gunnarsson I, Ronnelid J, Rogberg S, Klareskog L, Lundberg I.
Cytokine production, serum levels and disease activity in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18(5):56570.
[75] Werth VP, Bashir MM, Zhang W. IL-12 completely blocks ultraviolet-induced
secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha from cultured skin broblasts and
keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2003;120(1):11622.
[76] Houssiau FA, Mascart-Lemone F, Stevens M, et al. IL-12 inhibits in vitro
immunoglobulin production by human lupus peripheral blood mononuclear
cells (PBMC). Clin Exp Immunol 1997;108(2):37580.
[77] Yang J, Chu Y, Yang X, et al. Th17 and natural Treg cell population dynamics in
systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Rheum 2009;60(5):147283.
[78] Wong CK, Lit LC, Tam LS, Li EK, Wong PT, Lam CW. Hyperproduction of IL-23
and IL-17 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for
Th17-mediated
inammation
in
auto-immunity.
Clin
Immunol
2008;127(3):38593.
[79] Dong G, Ye R, Shi W, et al. IL-17 induces autoantibody overproduction and
peripheral blood mononuclear cell overexpression of IL-6 in lupus nephritis
patients. Chin Med J 2003;116(4):5438.
[80] Chang SH, Dong C. Signaling of interleukin-17 family cytokines in immunity
and inammation. Cell Signal 2011;23(7):106975.
[81] Tanasescu C, Balanescu E, Balanescu P, et al. IL-17 in cutaneous lupus
erythematosus. Eur J Int Med 2010;21(3):2027.
[82] Jabbari A, Suarez-Farinas M, Fuentes-Duculan J, et al. Dominant Th1 and
minimal Th17 skewing in discoid lupus revealed by transcriptomic
comparison with psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2014;134(1):8795.
334
[88] Illei GG, Shirota Y, Yarboro CH, et al. Tocilizumab in systemic lupus
erythematosus: data on safety, preliminary efcacy, and impact on
circulating plasma cells from an open-label phase I dosage-escalation study.
Arthrit Rheum 2010;62(2):54252.
[89] Makol A, Gibson LE, Michet CJ. Successful use of interleukin 6 antagonist
tocilizumab in a patient with refractory cutaneous lupus and urticarial
vasculitis. J Clin Rheumatol: Pract Rep Rheum Musculoskeletal Diseases
2012;18(2):925.
[90] Szepietowski JC, Nilganuwong S, Wozniacka A, et al. Phase I, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple intravenous, dose-ascending study
of sirukumab in cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthrit Rheum
2013;65(10):266171.
[91] Llorente L, Richaud-Patin Y, Garcia-Padilla C, et al. Clinical and biologic effects
of anti-interleukin-10 monoclonal antibody administration in systemic lupus
erythematosus. Arthrit Rheum 2000;43(8):1790800.