1

LONDONISTAN
(Little
Pakistan)
By Omar
Farooq Butt

Contents (2)
Introduction The rule of Muslims (4)
Chapter 1 -The religion of Islam in the Uk (7)
1.1 Biology
1.2 Religion
1.3 Religious practice
1.4 Religious affiliation
1.5 20,40
Chapter 2 The religion of Islam in the Uk and the Usa (32)
2.1 Outright
2.2 Baby names
2.3 The filter
2.4 The religion of Islam in Usa
2.5 The future statistical convergence of Muslim and Christian populations in
UK and USA
2.6 How will the world manage?

Chapter 3 The religion of Islam in the Uk and the Usa II (75)

3.1 Outcast America
3.2 The insignificance of Christianism
3.3 The liberation of Uk
3.4 Colonialism
3.5 Neo-colonialism and decolonialism
3.6 Statehood as atavism or antiquity
3.7 Religious ratios

3.8 The reproductive religious believers ratio

Chapter 4 Little Pakistan (91)

4.1 Shocking statistics revealing Islam has conquered Uks capital city,
London).
4.2 Conclusion a new survey

Introduction
The rule of Muslims
Given Uk as a whole has millions of Pakistanis whereas London hasnt, it is
natural to include Little Pakistan here as including Bangladeshis too. This gives
half a million. Perhaps a million with Indians too. In fact a relative majority by
20 to 30 years will be indeed considered an absolute majority if we include
Indians.

The moment that the white British become a minority will symbolize a huge
transfer of power
-

David Coleman, professor of demographics, University of Oxford

(regarding his own predicted date of 2066)

In this book, I could have drawn up tables which would have showed London in
the future has a Muslim majority after 30 odd years. This is assuming that the
Muslim population doubles and redoubles rapidly whilst the non-Muslim
population is stagnant. The example of 20 Muslims ruling the 80 non-Muslims
can take place in Crimea today. The country is 20% Muslim as say Hizb ut
Tahrir.
Notably London and therefore Uk and areas of earth such as Canada, Australia
and New Zealand too are 1/8 Muslim if not 1/5 at the last census. Very soon,
the Uk capital will be 1/7 or 14%, perhaps this year it already is. Soon this will
be 1/6 or 17% and then 1/5 or 20%.
Sociologists from this country have said that the coming generation will see a
huge transfer of power from Christians to Muslims as weekly participation in
religious services goes from being more in one party to more in the other.
Even now the man in the street being a practitioner of a Christian religious
activity is 1 in 100 whereas of being a congregant in a Muslim place of worship
is 1 in 50 or 2 in 100. The perceived unlikelihood of this is itself to be
eradicated over the next few decades, as church of England numbers decline
and Islam gathers adherents by the million or by the percentage point.

Whereas today out of 100 people, 1 practises Christianity, 2 are practising

Muslim, tomorrow it may be 1 is of the Anglican or other Christian
denominations, compared to several being practising Muslims. It is even
conceivable that under % will be practising Anglicanism, just like on a daily
basis at present in many areas in London.
This is the insignificance of Christianism. That today, even in the Uk, 0 or 1%
pray daily; whereas in Islam, the unofficial religion, several percentiles, maybe
similar to weekly basis where half the people are praying, maybe 6 % and 9%.
At this rate for Uk and Usa, we can predict for 50 years time:
ISLAM

CHRISTIANITY

UK
DAILY
7
0
WEEKLY
10
1
USA- DAILY
10
10
WEEKLY
20
16
Estimated 2065 figures for religious practice. Excludes catholics.
Indeed what is of note is that given, in London, for example the population is
Christian, so assumedly of these are White British and Christian, perhaps
slightly less. Muslim, Pakistanis (including Bangladeshis) are about a million
or 6 %. For these to equal off is possible in only 3 decades, that is 2 census
periods or the next census after the coming one:

White Christian
Muslim, Pakistani
2011
4m
m
2021
3m
1m
2031
2m
2m
Estimated 2031 equalisation of white christians and Pakistan Sub-continents
peoples in Britain, specifically London. Excludes Indians.
Mapping this for the Uk as a whole for the next 50 years or for the Usa for the
next 50 years is not impossible. What remains is the threat of ghettoisation,
Little Pakistan or North Pakistan. With only one census between now and then

(ie 2031), it is a much awaited one at that. Will Islam replace Christianity?
Remember 2030 is closer than 2000.
Thoughts
Britain is to become part of Islam in the eyes of the British, surely this is of
greater significance, culturally, politically, economically and religiously; and
that if it takes place, in 50 years, it is through our, as Muslims willingness to die
for our faith, and this is transition. That even a Pareto, or partial group can rule
the British Isles.

Chapter 1 - The religion of Islam in the UK

1.1- Biology
Islamic biological replacement theory- A study of UK birth rates
The non-Muslim faiths, led by christianism, in the UK, are going down in size of
population. They fail within consecutive census periods to reproduce or
replace the number of people. This is deemed as due to the break-down of
social structures such as prescribed by religious and faith practices. Specifically:

Marriage
Kinship and social structures
Sexual intercourse as sanctioned by revelatory ethics
Heterosexual norms
Punishments for sexual deviants

Note that these are anthropological, or biologically anthropological concepts,

not strictly sociological but rather closer to biological break-down. For
example, punishments and proscriptions (things labelled haram and deserving
of punishment in the next life) are not addressed directly, rather it is the breakdown of biology we are concerned with. Biological reproduction in its right
and wrong ways.
With divorce rates, homosexuality, and other non-reproductive sexual forms
soaring, reproduction has become impossible for Britons, especially those with
a non-replacing biology.
The economic argument too is completely separate. The rich may wish to
reproduce comparatively less, but in the UK we look at everybody and use a
normally representative sample. Everyone is slightly richer, so why would nonMuslims be biologically non-replacing?
Non-reproductive sexual activity
Courtship is an example of how non-Muslims spend their lives without finding
a sexual mate. Celibacy of the priesthood is another. What has happened, to
be frank and honest, is that perversions, such as pornography and paedophilia
have caused moral decay and demise of the system of reproduction of
humanity. Perhaps it is because of the warbent policy of the

warmongering armies who war in foreign lands: If they kill innocent fathers of
Muslim children, it lends for them to destroy the role of father within families.
The death of man/ the father
Fathers take care of families of a society. If they lose this place in societies of
foreign communities it will have an effect at home, here in the UK too.
Fatherless children are already more common in the USA, for example than
children with both parents, that is who live with and grow up with both
biological parents.
In Afghanistan, millions of martyrs have meant for (due to there being family
sizes of 5-10) almost tens of millions of orphans. It is no surprise out of under a
hundred million American children, in America, similarly tens of millions dont
live with both parents. Of just under a million children born in UK hospitals,
half will not live with both parents.
Biological replacement and reproduction
The study looks at both aspects of biological maladjustment, biological nonreplacement and biological non-reproduction. First I will deal with nonreplacement:
We should look at the change from one generation to another. An average age
at child-rearing age should be used as a yardstick for the length of study of
population change.
To calculate this we take the average age of child rearing add the average age
of having the last child and divide by two:
(28.1+30.1)/2=29.1 so three census periods. We will chose the last three, 1991
to 2011.
So, a rate of non-replacement can be studied. This is the change in birth rate or
the fertility rate. Specifically, the negativity of our non-Muslim religions birth
and fertility rates. Birth rate is defined as number of live births per 1000 of
population whereas fertility rate is taken to mean the change in the crude birth
rate annual figure.

Replacement theory concerns itself with Muslim population having high birth
rates and high fertility rates. Conversely, non-replacement is the negativity of
other religions birth rate, and non-reproduction is the negativity of other
religions fertility rates.
Here, we deduct from total population, atheist populations, assuming all the
rest are of other religions. The growth with Islam is compared, and
interestingly, there is a significant difference in all the last three censuses. Over
the generation the Muslim ummah outgrows non-Muslim religions by net
13,695 million. Over two million from Muslims born in the period and over
eleven million due to decline in kafir religions numbers.
The generation after this one (ie the next one after 1981-2011) will no doubt
see more Muslims than all other religions combined. So that would be about
2041, there will be more Muslims than non-Muslim religionists.
Now, I will deal with non-reproduction:
Assuming wedlock is the only appropriate form for marital relations, children
born out of wedlock will be taken as a percentage for non-reproduction:
So America has a half, Ireland a third and England a quarter of all live births are
to unmarried mothers. No doubt in all Muslim countries there is no figure for
this and it is deemed inappropriate and therefore insignificant . Muslims are
reproducing whereas non-Muslims it would seem are non-reproducing.
Birth rates, fertility rates and employment rates
In conclusion, to this chapter, we could have taken the fertility rate to mean
the rate of change of the birth rate, instead I have deducted the atheists from
the total and taken that to mean non-Muslim religions. Including those who
say they have no religion would be an unfair estimate to compare for religions.
New ideas are there in the sense that Muslim fertility is seen as the total (ie
gross) growth in the Muslim population in a year. The ideas of nonreplacement and non-reproduction too are new. Combining the two ideas, of
non- Muslims being both non-replacing and non-reproducing gives us
potentially a ratio of not how many are affiliated with Islam or not, nor how
many are married against single-parent families but how many from Islam and
from disbelievers collectively excluding atheists, are what I will term

10

reproductive religious believers. This rate is attained by multiplying the rate of

Muslims by the rate of legal marriages or the rate of disbelievers by the
number of non-single-parent families.
By comparing reproductive religious believers in all faith groups it is possible to
know, specifically with regard to social convention and the future, which group
has surpassed the rest, if it is Islam or not.
I will name this ratio the reproductive religious believers ratio. Accordingly, it
is very hard to show Islam doing badly as America, as an example, has its
Christian figure augmented for Religious and Believer in God as well as
having single-parent families taken out. It gives us a figure for religious practice
where the 50% of Christians, only 25% are practising, based on attendance
(number of congregants). This becomes 12.5% are religious, which becomes
6.25% believers and only 3% reproductive religious believers due to the
illegitimacy of half of the children. Muslims then are dominant as of 5% of the
population translates into 4% reproductive religious believers in most states,
all of whom are living with both parents, believers, religious and who practise.
The figure is similar to a productive religious believers percentage where
unemployed persons are deducted and employed believers percentage is
given.
For brevitys sake I will include my calculations for a few countries:
Islam vs Christianity
UK---4%/0.5%
(London)----15%/3%
USA----4%/3%
Ireland----- 1%/2%
Fig 21: non-replacement and ultimately non-reproduction of non-believers
The figures show how due largely to non-replacement and non-reproduction of
Christians, in the
UK, as in the US, the number of Muslims is not only growing but doubling very
quickly, for example between 1990 and 2010 (twenty years) and again
between 2010 and 2030 it is projected to do the same.

11

Further, the rate of growth, taken as a percentage is too doubling, in the UK,
every twenty years, displaying exponential growth.
The American data shows firstly that the non-Muslim birth rates worldwide are
lower and secondly that the predicted rates are falling below zero eventually.
Non-replacement corresponds to the first point, that the Muslim birth rates
are significantly above the non-Muslim ones, and non-reproduction
corresponds to the second point, that the overall non-Muslim rate is not only
heading below zero but that that means the total population is decreasing.
Just to reiterate, non-replacement and non-reproduction of disbelievers means
that they have a negative birth rate relatively (to the Muslim birth rate) and
absolutely (to their own previous years rates). It also means that their
numbers are falling whereas ours are rising and that their rate of decline is
rising whilst our numbers increase exponentially.
What we then need to look at instead of just birth rates being preferred over
population figures as a whole; is the religious practices and how they develop
into the future based on current trends.

12

1.2 Religion
Here, in the UK, Muslims are some 35% of the total population in certain
London boroughs. As we are (or at least our parents and grandparents were)
reproducing at disproportionately higher rates than our Christian counterparts,
sometimes we are tripling our population where theirs is levelling off, we
expect to become a majority over them within a few decades, in their own
eyes.
Perhaps, what is not relevant is the monarchy or the official religion of the
country (or countries) but that within a few decades, given that the population
change (largely due to our population explosion) is going to effect not only
schools and so on but the so-called establishment of the church and so on
(eg. Universities and so on) is that Islam needs to be mobilised to replace
churches with mosques, secular education with religious education and so on
as well as Christians with Muslims.
In fact, unless the legal institutions arent replaced with more humane and
equal ones, they will not stand as they will fail to bare the weight of a country
where people go to mosque more often than church.
If children go to madrassa or have a Molvi come home to teach why should we
expect them to settle with Jesus or Trinity college in Oxford or Cambridge?
If the Muslim population explosion yields a quadrupling within if not 20 years
then however many years (30 years then) we must assume that since
Catholicism is not allowed ascension to the throne yet churches are often
Catholic, due to their presumed higher level of attendance, that Muslims must
follow the same path. The 1,500 or so mosques in the UK accommodate a
maximum of, (times 500) 750,000 worshippers, congregations have to be
doubled per service. Should the population double, will they quadruple?
Should mosque-building take place so that, like catholics (and church of
England established churches) there are tens of thousands?
If there are more Muslim congregants in the UK in mosques (Muslim places of
worship) there should be more in a daily and weekly basis, than there are
Christian congregants in the UK in churches (Christian places of worship), there
should be more mosques than churches or at least more mosques should be
built than churches.

13

London boroughs
Camden
City of London
Hackney
Hammersmith and
Fulham
Haringey
Islington
Kensington and Chelsea
Lambeth
Lewisham
Newham
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
Wandsworth
Westminster
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet
Bexley
Brent
Bromley
Croydon
Ealing
Enfield
Greenwich
Harrow
Havering
Hillingdon
Hounslow
Kingston upon Thames
Merton
Redbridge
Richmond upon Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest
Total or average

Population
220,338
7,375
246,270

Muslims
26,643
409
34,727

182,493
254,926
206,125
158,649
303,086
275,885
307,984
288,283
254,096
306,995
219,396
185,911
356,386
231,997
311,215
309,392
363,378
338,449
312,466
254,557
239,056
237,232
273,936
253,957
160,060
199,693
278,970
186,990
190,146
258,249
8,173,941

18,242
36,130
19,521
15,812
21,500
17,759
98,456
24,551
87,696
24,746
40,073
25,520
36,744
5,645
58,036
7,841
29,513
53,198
52,141
17,349
29,881
4,829
29,065
35,666
9,474
16,262
64,999
6,128
7,726
56,541
1,012,823

Muslims
as a
percentage
12.09%
5.55%
14.10%
10.00%
14.17%
9.47%
9.97%
7.09%
6.44%
31.97%
8.52%
34.51%
8.06%
18.27%
13.73%
10.31%
2.43%
18.65%
2.53%
8.12%
15.72%
16.69%
6.82%
12.50%
2.04%
10.61%
14.04%
5.92%
8.14%
23.30%
3.28%
4.06%
21.89%
12.39%

Figure 4: 2011 Religious affliation in London boroughs

Source: 2011 Census data

Average weekly
worshippers
in Muslim
places of

Average daily
worshippers
in Muslim
places of

worship
9.07%
4.16%
10.58%

worship
6.05%
2.77%
7.05%

7.50%
10.63%
7.10%
7.47%
5.32%
4.83%
23.98%
6.39%
25.88%
6.05%
13.70%
10.30%
7.73%
1.82%
13.99%
1.90%
6.09%
11.79%
12.52%
5.11%
9.37%
1.53%
7.96%
10.53%
4.44%
6.11%
17.47%
2.46%
3.05%
16.42%
9.29%

5.00%
7.09%
4.74%
4.98%
3.55%
3.22%
15.98%
4.26%
17.26%
4.03%
9.13%
6.86%
5.16%
1.22%
9.32%
1.27%
4.06%
7.86%
8.34%
3.41%
6.25%
1.02%
5.31%
7.02%
2.96%
4.07%
11.65%
1.64%
2.03%
10.95%
6.20%

14

In fact, if Islam is growing at a greater pace than Christianity there should be

more Mosque-building. However this is precisely because UK masses and
classes are more mosque-going than church-going.
The principle that because Muslim congregants exceed Christian congregants
means Mosques should be built up until there are as many as there are
churches is one of equality and freedom of worship. It assumes only a respect
of rights of Muslims in a country where we are told we have both equal rights
and freedom of worship.
Given that many London Boroughs schools are of a Muslim majority and that
congregation numbers are of greater significance in Islam as opposed to
christianism (ie. Mosque numbers and sizes exceed church congregation sizes),
it is noted that the British Queen has no right to rule her own people let
alone those of Canada, West Indies, Australia and New Zealand.
If there are 16,000 English churches, there should be 15,000 or 20,000
Mosques, otherwise there is no equal rights. There is no freedom of worship.
If we are drawing graphs of religious worshippers with catholic, protestant and
Muslim (with Muslim equal to both combined and scheduled to double within
1 census and quadruple within 2), surely there should be more representation
at government level, ascension to the throne and more awareness of the
facts.All of these will allow for more mosque-building, which is clearly the
desire of the people, from its youth to its elderly.

15

1.3- Religious practice

In the battle of humanity versus humanism, antiquity versus iniquity, Islam
versus Christianity; the definition of religious practice based on those who say
they are religious and that they believe in God, over religious affiliation must
prevail.
Christians conduct their own surveys showing 40% say they go to Church but
when this is surveyed only 20% actually are attending. Also many Christian
religion affiliated people deny the existence of God and say they dont believe
there is a God and that they are not religious, yet instead of being atheist
in the Census, they are down as Christians. This makes no sense at all.
If there is one measure for religious affiliation, there are more Christians than
Muslims. If there are as well as that two measures for Religious practice,
Muslims far out-measure Christians in London and are the true heirs to the
throne of England, to the legal institutions and so on.
The analysis could go further, by asking firstly, does the respondent believe in
God Almighty? Further to this does he admit to being religious? This would
give us again, a five-fold scale to determine who is dominant. As this is an even
number it will be easy to see to which religion does each borough belong.
The UK is now a Muslim majority country, just like France and Germany, have
maximum Muslim worshippers, it is dar al Islam. Some ullema, such as ShafiI
scholar al-Rafii included in his definition that Dar al Islam once named as such
remains Dar al Islam until the day of Judgement.
Imam Abu Hanifa is said to have founded the concept based on the gate of
Paradise, dar as salam. Dar al-Islam is also known and referred to as Dar alSalam, or house/abode of Peace. The term appears in the Koran in 10.25 and
6.127 as a name of Paradise:
And [know that] God invites [man] unto the abode of peace, and guides him
that wills [to be guided] onto a straight way.
Theirs shall be an abode of peace with their Sustainer; and He shall be near
unto them in result of what they have been doing.
According to Abu Hanifa, considered to be the originator of the concept, the
two requirements for a country to be part of Dar al-Islam are:

16

1. Muslims must be able to enjoy peace and security with and within this
country.
2. It has common frontiers with some Muslim countries.
If the former does not apply then physical means such as Jihad can be used to
correct the situation and in the latter case, individuals are required to do hijra
to where they can practise their religion.
Other followers of Hanbali madhab have said:
There are only two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr. Any Dar (domain) where
Islamic law is dominant is Dar al Islam, and any domain where Kufr law is
dominant is Dar al Kufr, there are only these two camps.
- Ibn Muflih (died 884 AH)
There is not much explanation in the Holy Quran itself, of the concept of Dar Al
Islam, nonetheless, the term is used widely by the scholars. Sayyed Qutb, even
talks of Dar al Islams opposite being Dar al Harb. Others mention Dar al Hijra,
pointing out that this began when Rasulallah (SWS) migrated away from
Mecca. As opposed to Dar al Jihad, stands Dar al Ahd. Others have equated Dar
al Islam with Dar al Muslimeen.
Types of Dar (and ways of judging a land as Muslim or not)
1. Dar al Islam Are muslim religious worshippers in the majority?
2. Dar al Harb Are Muslims struggling militarily and persevering in their fight
in the land?
3. Dar al Aman - Is there safety and security?
4. Dar al Hijra Is this a land of immigration? A land for the Muslim Ummah to
emigrate to?
5. Dar al Ahd Are covenants kept? Are human rights met?
6. Dar al Muslimeen Is everything from government to social welfare in the
hands of Muslims done purely for Allahs sake?
7. Dar al Kufr? Are there still kafirs?
The above defintions, concern various Islaamic concepts, Ibadat, Jihad, Salam,
Risalat, Muamalat, Islam and finally, kufr.
The British Isles are dar al Islam and not Dar al Kufr, because:

17

1. France and Germany enjoy maximum Muslim worshippers, and they are the
nearest to border states.
2. The Islands themselves are enjoying maximum Muslim worshippers, over a
million per week in the
places of worship.
3. The authority invested in Muslim leaders (ie Sultans) to authorise others
behaviour. Eg UN, NATO, IMF, WB etc are often conducted through the British
system in some way or another.
4. Dawah in the UK
5. High Muslim birth rates
6. Christian homosexuality and divorce
7. Immigration from Muslim countries
Maybe America, one day too, replace its Judeo-Christian ideology with a
Muslim one. Ameen. Maybe Judaism will be replaced, in the occupied
Palestine, through dawah, reproduction and immigration, of Muslims, if not
the jihad fisabilillah in the occupied Palestine.
May the conquest of the British Isles serve as a means to ameliorate the
condition of the Muslims in the rest of the world. Ameen.
It is our sincere prayer that the English language and English literature type
culture be replaced, once for all with Arabic Studies and Islamic studies as a
mode of salvation for humanitys ills. Having begun a BA degree in Islamic
Studies I know how fulfilling and indeed spiritually rewarding it is to study the
deen of Allah Subhanahu wa Ta Ala, instead of the poets of the age of
perversity and ignorance. May Shirk and Kufr of these Islands be turned into
the fulfillment of its majority or maximum religion and our organised religion.
Amin
Now that it is established that Islam has been present in the now-EU countries,
and if we follow Ar Rafis statement that once part of the Muslim Ummah, a
nation is always part of the Muslim Ummah, we can draw further conclusions:
Firstly that al Andalus (Spain and Portugal) are still Muslim lands. Secondly,
that the British Islands, (where it is proved that at the seat of power, the
Muslims are the relative religious majority), too are Muslim lands.

18

Boo-e Yemen Aaj bhi us ki hawaoun mein hein, Rang e Hijaz Aaj bhi us ki
nawaoun mein hein, Deda e Anjum mein hein teri Zameen, Asmaan, Aah! Ke
Sadiyaoun se hein teri fiza be Azaan
Even today in its breeze fragrance of Yemen still floats, Even today in its songs
echoes live on of Hejaz, Under the stars your realm lies like a heaven; alas!
Ages are fled since your courts heard their last prayer-call sound.
The Mosque of Cordoba- Sir Muhammad Iqbal
The second assertion, being that London, therefore Britain is, in fact, part of
the Muslim lands, holds true due to the fact of the indigeneity of Islam in the
land. An indigenous people are those who live naturally inspite of imposition of
unnatural (if you like) government, by another people. In this case by
Brussels and Westminster (or the system, the machine, the Vikings etc). As
Muslims, our marginalisation is both historical, in the sense of radically altering
history and is conducted through the state (although not settlers), in this case
the so-called British government. These people are in fact pure bruts or brats,
and are themselves governed by Brussels and bring into disrepute every
civilised law.
The proof of this is that while we, Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding in the
Muslim British lands, historically Christian Westminster, NATO, EU etc (the
establishment) is warmongering, imposing mass murder, mass rape and
mass famine throughout this century and the last, at home and abroad. So
although the state has not been established in spite of a Muslim territory in
Britain, the present British royalty are self- imposed in the sense of having
imposed mega- murder, mega- rape, and mega- famine.
There is no alternative to recognition of the British Islands as part of the
Muslim empire. To do this we must reactivate an Islamic Political Party in
Britain, and begin our entrance into the political process. As the system of
tyranny founded terrorism as its politics, we must then launch a law suit
against the queen and the present British government based in London,
through the ICC in Malaysia.
Unfortunately, the philosophy of subversion and deviation, the path we have
been forced into practicing and will only continue to do so, tells us to hate our
religion and to be submissive to other religions. This is complete balderdash
and must be discontinued immediately.

19

The survey at the end of this book would give a clear answer, to how many of
the London boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them
How are figures for religious affiliation and practice calculated?
The two Projections (one of five years from now and the other of 15 years in
time), tell us very soon, half of London will enjoy mainly Muslims as the
inhabitants and not Christians.
They are based on 2.1 birth rate for Christians and 4.25 birthrate for Muslims.
They assume a stagnant Christian population against doubling of Muslim
population.The figures for practice are, for Islam, and for weekly and daily
worship. For Christianity, 5% and a seventh of that are taken for average. The
charts show this but the figures have now been changed by being capped at
50% for Muslim majority boroughs. This has meant overall domination has not
been shown as in previous versions of the figures.
I have already mentioned that by the turn of the next century, the British Isles
will, I am sure, will be a Muslim country, with its own place in the Ummah of
Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon Him).
The reasons for this are that London already has:
Maximum Muslim religious worshippers
London will, by 2031, the census 18 years from now:
Be a Muslim Majority.
And it will, in all probability, by the next census from then:
Have more Muslims than non-Muslims
We can put this another way: Islam has grown on the British Isles to the point
that for the children born at the beginning of this century:
1. A Muslim majority is statistically probable in their lifetime (Outright 1)
2. Maximum Muslim worshippers have already emerged as dominant in
London (Outright 2)
What is Outright?

20

1. The 1st method of outright Muslim domination

Evident, in London Boroughs such as Tower Hamlets, there are more Muslims
than Christians. In terms of religious affiliation, Muslims outnumber all other
religious groups. This concerns the census 2011 question What is your
religion? or What religion do you belong to?
The next census will see 3/33 London Boroughs Muslim majority included in
this is Shariah zone Walthamstow in the borough of Waltham Forest (which as
a whole has not been designated a Shariah zone, albeit part of it was,
temporarily)
2. Outright 2
By this method most of London is already Muslim and therefore as London is a
seat of power, so too are Canada, Jamaica, the Malvinas, Australia and New
Zealand (anywhere the Queen has dominion) as are the rest of the British Isles.
For outright 2 to be successful, and it has been, religious practice is considered
as well as religious affiliation, twice or four times as much. These are the
relevant questions to which the answer determines whether a population is
considered Muslim or not:
1. To which religion do you say you belong to?
2. Are you a believer in God?
3. Do you consider yourself religious?
Outright 1 takes just the first question only into account. Outright 2 may also
look at the second and third as well as daily worship and weekly attendance at
places of worship in Britain.
Muslims have in the London population:
1. Maximum Muslim worshippers already
2. A Muslim majority by 2031
3. More Muslims than unbelievers by, say 2041
What wed really like to see, is the people have some sort of plebiscite for Self
Determination for Londoners who are at least by Religious Practice and not
just affiliation, Muslim. In terms of religious affiliation, the London boroughs

21

are maximum Muslim by 2031, but by the strict terms of religious practice they
are majority Muslim already.
We can then assume a Muslim government between 2 and 3. Further to this,
Imam Hanifas two points of security and border states, there are Ibn Muflihs
arguments. That the two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr are independent. In this
case, it is not until all three points are achieved in this country that it is Dar al
Islam. This is only a difference in noting the presence of Islam in the country
between the maximum religion (now Islam in the major cities) and the
majority, or a relative majority and an absolute majority.
Our gift to the Christians of these Islands, the British Isles is Islam, which we
intend to leave in our children and grandchildren. Further to this we will inherit
the ethnic minority or silent minority status that they have given us, to them.
The very real threat of over a hundred years of war will bear the fruit of
Britain. Only megareligiousness, not just inner and outer religiousness can
bring this about. When we are allowed to practice and not just practise our
religion. I say that knowing that in London, the seat of all British power,
religious practice as per weekly attendance of Londons places of worship,
daily congregational worship as well as peoples own admissions in the
censuses as to their own religious affiliation, has swayed from Christian to
Muslim, perhaps 15 years ago. What is described as the outright domination of
religious practice is itself a somewhat different matter, as it is not deemed
appropriate to define as Muslim, an area where any one of, weekly worship,
daily worship or specified affiliation is not under the religion of Islam. The
nearest census at this point in time is in fact 2021, as it will be begun to be
collated in five years, and so it is of added relevance that outright religious
domination belongs to the religion of Islam for 3 of the 33 boroughs. That they
have maximum Muslims as opposed to Christians is the difference between
them.
The philosophy of Outright method
What is the philosophy of outright domination? Outright domination is where
a part of the Muslim Ummah, a community or nation, is practising the religion
of Islam more than practitioners of any other group are practicing their
religion. A statistical method of differentiating to some extent a relig-ion
having real and practical domination in any population and therefore having
the right to rule and govern In this country it is a cold fact that there are more
people observing the Islamic religion than Christianity. When we write it up as

22

a percentage sign, we see that the M% is Islam ie. 10% in the general
population are Muslim, so Islam is the relative majority. This no doubt reminds
us of the Messenger of Islam (SWS) whose name also begins with M Prophet
Mohammad (SWS).
In the battle of Islam, religion for Allah Alone, versus Christianism, we find
jahiliyya (unbelief) repre-sents the strength of Crescent as well C%. I say this
because, given the high number of atheists, nones, those who say they have
no religion, and the high ethnic diversity of London, the real test of our rule ie
Muslim rule over non-Muslims, will be how well we treat others and that
includes people of other faiths.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from where the Blessed Prophet Mohammad
(SWS) came from, Iraq from where science came from, Ash Sham from where
honourable people came from, Iran from where much of world religion came,
Hindustan, from where the father of humanity came, China, the richest
country in the world, Egypt, from where much scholarship is done, Turkey,
from where many peoples and languages come, Pakistan, from where is the
home of Sainthood in Islam, S.E. Asia from where there are many cultures, Mali
(Timbuktu) home of spirituality, Azerbaijan, from where scholars of ahadith
come and Yemen from where much is learned; all are falling in the Muslim
Ummah, in whole or in part.
As well as Badakhsha (Afghanistan), Bukhara (Uzbekistan) and Britannia (From
where we pray Islamic economics and finance, particularly will be given a
world vision). If not by 2031, let it be, may it be, by 2041, or thereabouts.
Allah says in the Qur'an:
"O believers, save yourselves and your family from the Hellfire whose fuel is
men and stones"
Surah e Tahrim, Verse 6
It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to
manifest it over all religion. And sufficient is Allah as Witness.
THQ 48:28

23

A movement for the Islamic conquest of Britain will seek to answer the
question of Muslim political participation as well as rule. Why is it our holiday
is not accepted in the public holidays of the public, and yet the matter is not in
the public eye?
The reason outright domination is twofold is that people do not complain:
1. That Islamic conquest is all-of-a-sudden
2. That the Islamic conquest of UK is relative No, It is a fact!
There are scientific, or statistical reasons. So we can make it clear, that over
the last 50 years, the incremental 100 and something mosques that have been
built are just the beginning. We NEED thousands of more by twenty years time.
Otherwise we will pray in the streets! We are going to be millions more
Muslims, in London.
In 20 years from now, Eid will be (inshallah) observed 4 or 5 times more than
xmas or easter on their own. The philosophy of replacement of UK Christianism
with Islam comes with the transference of political power from Christianism to
Islam (The rise of Islam is helped by the death of Christianity in Britain). What is
interesting is that 35-40% is the percentage of UK Muslims who are Pakistani.
Surely then UK is itself subject to the philosophy of Pakistaniat. It is itself a
little Pakistan.
What is this philosophy? It is that, you know when you pick up a musical
instrument for the first time and play a wrong note? It reminds us of somehow
China or India, or we hope of American music or something? In the
enlightened miracle of Pakistan (ie in the future), without the intervention of
Pakistani popular music, that off-key chord will remind us of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan. Wherever they may be in this world. Nay, whoever they
may be.
Like Mandarin, English, Spanish and Hindi are the most widely spoken
languages of the world, Pakistan, India, China and America will, by 2050
(inshallah) the four most populous countries in the world. So, why not?
So every drum will beat the rhythm of Pakistan and every instrument will play
to its tune....it will grow to being no smaller than America....3.9% of the world.
The philosophy of Inteqal (Transference/death/ transmission/ suicide)

24

Inteqal is one means by which English peoples and the English language will be
inherited to the Muslim Ummah due to the Muslim Ummahs outright
domination of human populations:
Death of Diana - Politically, what is relevant is not just the potential
ascension to the throne of Muslims, thwarted by the Elizabeth 2, but the
political suicide by the English through their debauchery and
warmongery.
Shame - The Europeans lost their shame a few centuries ago. We now
see how they will lose their British Isles. Why? Because in losing their
shame they lost all self-respect. Something Muslims value highly.
Genocide - Since Christianism is an obsession with genocide and a form
of violent extremism (racism) it is of no surprise that suicide is their
means of solving their own self-created menace.
Catholic terrorism They say terrorism has no religion. Yet I remember
clearly it was invented here in the British Isles. In Ireland.
The philosophy of the method of outright domination of Islam outlines how
between now and some point in the not too distant future, Muslims aim to
come to power over Christians in the UK.
I have shown convincingly that due to their being more worship (ibadah) in the
religion of Islam as compared to Christianism, there is more opportunity for
doing worship (ibadah). And because of there being more opportunity for
doing worship in the religion of Islam than in Christianism, there are more
Muslims in the places of worship in the UK, than Christians, today and for the
past 10-15 years, on a daily basis or on a weekly basis.
The crucial fact here is simply that if a congregational prayer takes place in a
place of worship in London:
1. On any given day there will be more Muslims in Muslim places of worship
than Christians in Christian places of worship.
2. In any given week there will be the same above situation and we can assume
(given two religious holidays each) the same for any given religious holiday.

25

3. More Muslims will be recorded in the next census after the coming one,
than Christians.
Admittedly, situation 3 is one which is still not an absolute majority and so the
Monarchy and the legal institutions remain in the hands of the enemy.
Nonetheless it has been situation 1 for over a decade now, and situation 2 has
recently come true.
ld
What we now await is a situation 4:
4. More Muslims than Non-Muslims in the UK seat of power (London).
We expect this to happen by the next census afterwards (ie 2051).
The end of genocide
Is one whose heart Allah has opened to Islam, so that he has received
Enlightenment from Allah, (no better than one hard-hearted)? Woe to those
whose hearts are hardened against celebrating the praises of Allah. they are
manifestly wandering (in error)!
The Holy Quran 39:22
Unfortunately the wicked Christians of these Islands have been falsely claiming
that they are children of Abraham, when a cursory look at the Bible reveals
Abraham came from Iraq originally so his progeny are the Iraqis. The progeny
of his childrens were settled in Palestine, so their children were Palestinians.
On what grounds do these unholy warmongers, America, Britain and Israel lay
claim to Abraham (PBUH) as their father we might ask? That they, instead of
honouring the poor of the respected countries, talk of war instead of peaceful
or Islamic reasons for their and anyone elses honour. This has got to stop!
Given their megamurder, megarape, megacrippling, megafamine and
megadrought, we can see:
1. The Murder of Christ is the cause of their vengeful evil.
2. Genocide has become through this the only legitimisation they seek to
obtain.

26

Every other country has suffered millions dying due to the actions of
Christianism and its evil:
1. Polluted water or energy shortages (eg. Pakistan)
2. Inadequate food (eg. Somalia)
3. Spasticism (eg. Iraq)
4. Genocidal rape (eg. Bosnia- Herzogovinia)
5. Direct military combat (eg. Afghanistan)
In fact when we look at how the world has suffered in the modern world it is
due largely to the menace of Judeo-Christianism and its need for committing
genocide.
Our response is to put right the wrong directly. If we can control the British
Kingdom. And by that I mean if we can infiltrate the institution of royalty and
the other legal institutions, there will be no dire need for the acceptance of the
spread of the Islamic faith.
By the British Kingdom I mean all of the UK and its dominion. And you could
say the new commonwealth. If the people are saying out with the Bible in with
the Holy Quran then the Monarchy and the other legal institutions MUST be
changed in time.
Judeo- Christianity is part of history, a legacy, it is of no use. Let us be merciful
and not vengeful by committing genocide the way they do. Let us allow UKs
Christians to commit political suicide in front of our very eyes on our British
Isles. Our by virtue of our being the conquering generation.
Allah ta Ala tells us in the Holy Quran:

"Those who believe, and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of
Allah. for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find
satisfaction.
The Holy Quran Surah Ar Rad Verse 28
Inteqaliat (transference or transition) of Uk power from Christian to Muslim
hands

27

Given that a Muslims life and property are a sacred trust in every other
Muslims hands, Christians are wrongfully assuming the right of life over the
Muslim Jesus. For this reason they are all committing a major sin and are like
murderers or far worse.
For this reason, we as Muslims must:
1. Take the power they have back for ourselves
2. Fight them and their forces with our full effort
3. Realise that a rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours.
Once we are just and mujahideen in the cause of Allah Almighty, we need to
adopt a certain effort to have a strategy or policy, whereby we accept that
regarding the UK and the British throne, we are nearly there, and regarding
political power in the houses of parliament and the houses of Lords, we are
getting there.
Perhaps the earliest and most crucial sign of Muslims conquering Britain were
Britains loss of The European wars of 1914 and 1939, to foreign majorly
Islamic forces. This has been a precursor to the loss of the Islands to outright
Muslim domination.

28

1.4 Religious affiliation

How many East London boroughs have more Muslim children, and we can infer
more Muslim births than Christian, for example? However as around 19% at
that age are Muslim, compared to around 15% overall, there is a higher ratio of
Muslim to Non-Muslim than if we measure the overall population.
If 6 boroughs have for the last 4 years had more births to Christian families,
only one has had more to Muslim families. Nevertheless the greatest religious
majority in any single London borough is in Tower Hamlets, a Muslim majority.
This evidence from local area authorities suggest to me that my child and
other Muslim children attending schools in the area are by no means a
minority or an exception to the rule. The table gives us a sample of the children
who begin school in the various boroughs of London as Muslim or Christian. It
also tells us of the last four years births, are they to, more Christians or
Muslim families, approximately. Perhaps it is better to compare the Muslim
faith with non-Muslim religions collectively. Noting the fact of Islams
populations surge by 2% (from census records) and other religions fall in
numbers, we can gauge the matter has historical implications for the Islamic
liberation of the United Kingdom. Indeed the question is not one of
percentages Muslim or Christian but one of the countries of the UK, also the
home countries of the UK, Muslim or Christian?
We look at the above data for a historical answer, sociologically (due to the
dominance of Islam in the world), biologically (due to the demise of nonMuslims), but the answer is history. If the view of anthropology is taken that
the crucial difference is one of culture of the people, then surely it is not the
name Jack, that is most popular and most chosen but the name Muhammad.
Indeed, it is not the union jack Sir, but the Unity of Divinity taught by the last
Messenger of Allah ta Ala, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which is the guiding
light for the religion of this country, this land, for 10-15 years now. For my
generation, for this generation. For generations to come, Inshallah azawajal.

29

1.5 20, 40 (A philosophy for the future)

Muslim majority rule in the UK
We are living and breathing in the 2010's. The next decade is the 2020's, then
the 2030's.
According to my calculations for London and England (which already practice
Islam, although more profess Christianism outwardly) the UK will be, by the
2040's majorly or majority Muslim. London, Birmingham, Luton, Leicester,
Bradford and such like already have more Muslims than Christians as per
religion. Soon, Manchester, Liverpool, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Dublin and Belfast
and so on too will have in a couple of decades time. This is due largely to the
so-called "non-replacement" of British and European families and Muslim
families contrasting (much higher) family sizes. So where are our political
parties? Why are there anti-Muslim parties in parliament? Where our
hundreds of members of the houses of parliament? Where is our
representation in the media? Our Muslim English newspapers? What will, no
doubt start in 2040, when tens of millions will begin to try and institute our
rules in these islands is beginning to crystallise as a vision in the minds of our
children. The present respected Muslim peoples, the silent majority, in the
parameters of religious action, of 3-4 million will soon grow to 10 million. If, by
2040, it should double we will be able to rule the violent minority, christians
being technically the minority as per religious practice.
Replacement theory -Biological and religious
Replacement theory tells us that the Muslim peoples of the UK must, due to
the biological self-replacement of lineages (ie the sociological effect of
reproduction and higher fertility rates) as well as the religious desires of the
Muttaqun (the pious) to eliminate cultural Islam and create a pure Islamic
culture, succeed, in defeating:
The so-called "British" empire
So-called "American" exceptionalism
"White supremacy"
Racist Christianism
Colonial and neo-colonial oppression

30

If we are to defeat the motif of Islamophobia, rooted as it is in the drive to war

against every Muslim country over the past 100 years, we, as residents of
these Islands we should realise not just that our past, present and future
depends on our Islamic identity but that our children, who are named, more
than any other name, Mohammad, the name of the Prophet of Allah (SWS) and
of the religion of Al Islam, are growing up witnessing these same atrocities
carried out or supported by us in the name of, basically our own ignorance.
The indigenity of the respected Muslim peoples of the general population of
the UK
Generally, followers of religion in the major cities of UK (if a sample is drawn
from the general public of, for example London) are Muslim. As a
complementary point, worshippers or religious worshippers in UK countries
are generally Muslim, that is the indigenous religion in England is Al Islam.
2040 Future religion
The principle of 20/40%
A population of only 10% of a nation can double and redouble upon which it
would nearly succeed in becoming a majority.
The philosophy of 20/40 (Absolute majority)
Countries are either Dar al Islam or not. If 20 of 40 people are Muslim it rules
out there being any other religion which should rule.
The rule of Islam by 2040
By 2040 many countries with at present 20 % of our population being Muslim
will face their majority turning into a Muslim majority in the country eg UK,
France, Germany, Israel, Spain, India. 40% may represent a relative majority
only, but assuming other ethnicities constitute 20% it is an unsurpassable
majority, so the countries are Dar al Islam by virtue of not not
being so. These and other similar countries will find by 2040 they will be,
unless they can match Muslim fertility rates, be ruled by Muslims.
20 to 40 million Muslims in the lands
Some commentators estimate the true Muslim population of the UK to be 10
million at the present, it would then have to only double to become 20 million.
Then should it double muslims will outnumber everyone else.

31

20 if not 40%
Outright 2 is where all three criteria for religion are met and outright 1 is
where only the official definition is fulfilled. By these definitions, 1 and 2, only
Tower Hamlets in 2011, Tower Hamlets, Redbridge and Newham in 2021
(inshallah), and around half of the London boroughs by 2031 (13 of 33)
inshallah, have outright definition. And that is in the Islamic faith.
We therefore demand better representation for Muslims in the houses of
parliament, more honorific titles bestowed upon us as nobility, as well as
legislation to be passed by the Queen of England, legalising our right to
ascension to the throne.
What this proves is that the Uk countries are not non- Muslim countries in the
sense of being Christian countries, but rather (given a minority of people are
Christian), they are yet to be Muslim majority countries (albeit in non-Muslim
lands).
20, 40 teaches us that if in London Muslim births are some 20% of all births,
and Christians are only 40something % in the land anyways, Islam has the
upper hand biologically.

32

Chapter 2 - The Religion of Islam in the UK and the USA

2.1 Outright

50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Islam
Christianity

2020

2040

2060

2080

The overtaking of Islam over all religions in America (outright 2- Muslim

congregants are shown in millions against Christian)
Outright 1: Muslim majority by religion or religious affiliation.
Outright 2: Muslim maximum (daily observance and weekly attendance)
The religious practicability of Londoners has clearly swayed from Christian to
Muslim. Not only is there a Muslim majority where a Christian majority is
impossible but soon we will have a Muslim land where a Christian land will be
impossible.
The Christians will soon be living in quasi-Bantustans in cities like London. So
whereas today Redbridge, Tower Hamlets, Waltham Forest and Hackney form
the East London Muslim Crescent, soon, assuming West London and North

33

London only are dominated by Islam, Christians will live in the Bantustan of
South London in London as a whole. South of the River Thames being the only
place where they are still in the majority.
Whereas today the white British ethnic minority applies only in London,
Slough, Leicester and Luton; tomorrow Bradford, Birmingham, Sheffield and
other cities will see more people, for example from the Indo-Pak sub-continent
(by their roots) than white.
Therefore Hindi-Urdu will become the lingua franca and Anglicanism will
remain as it has this century or even this millennium, the occupying faith of the
violent minority throughout Britain and its dominion. English as a language
becomes the lingua franca of the capitalist or democratic movement in India.
However what is vital here is that in Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Virgin
Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands and the West Indies, and on the
British Isles themselves (anywhere considered part of Britain) we have
witnessed Islam take over Christianity as the practicable religion of the people.
It can realistically never win back the status of the religion of the UK.
Muslims are a religious grouping and we pray our eemaan never weakens.
Ameen.
The Islamic revolution in Britain is clearly threefold:
1. Maximum
2. Majority
3. Muslim
The millions of this Ummah are, in Urdu or Persian:
1. Jamhour (The majority)
2. Jamhouri (Democratic)
3. Jamhouriat (Persian for republic)
What is clear from the sources of Islaamic law is that democracy is not so much
a trickle-down from ijma, or consensual opinion of scholars, but that it is from

34

the very idea of dar al islam. In other words the ideas of democracy and
republic come from the ideas of:
1. Muslim countries
2. Muslim majority nations
Jamhour itself means majority or democracy. Therefore, The Islamic Republic
of Great Britain, is Britain as we now know it, where the majority practice Islam
and the only democratic ideology is one of the Muslims, Islam.
Interestingly, the right and left wing of American politics too, democratism and
republicanism, stem from these concepts of democracy and before that
majority.
Perhaps there is a lack of education about the meaning of, or the significance
of having a Muslim majority. Indeed Great Britain having a Muslim majority
implies it is an Islamic (Democratic) Republic. This Islamic Democratic
Republicanism is logically possible because of the majority Muslim
demography.
Legislation is only from Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no legislation
that is not for Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). If the ideology of the British
republic and democracy is pressed it therefore cannot yield to monarchy or
anarchy. The religion of Islam informs us of the superiority of Muslims and
Muslim rule over non-Muslims (who have no right to rule).
Officially, in the capital, London, the white British of the British Isles are now a
minority. The label of Black and minority ethnicity then applies no longer. It is a
majority (Islam) who are dominant.
Having acknowledged London as the seat of power of Britain, we conclude
Britain is already something like an Islamic democratic republic of Britain. The
moral majority of the British Isles have automatically replaced the violent
Christian minority and from now on our rules are going.
They tried to implement democracy at gunpoint in Iraq and Afghanistan and
not only killed thousands of thousands of people but created multi-holocaust

35

in their foreign wars. Now through peace and the hope of peace, we see Great
Britain is now something like an Islamic Democratic Republic of Britain.
Islamic democratic republic for the future, what a great idea! Islamic
Democratic Republic of UK in the future, what a wonderful thing! The
thousands of adherents of the church of England, the abolished religion of the
British Isles do not come near, do not compare to the millions of Muslims, Godfearing and coming from proper practising families not broken homes, who
seek only to defend the faith of God from being attacked and to prevent
blasphemy and calumny of our faith. Where is the sense in upholding the 800year old Magna Carta (so-called grand charter) when the people have long
abolished the religion?
Where are our childrens Muslim English newspapers, Muslim schools, Islamic
universities, mosques, madrassas and Islamic legislature (ie. Full
implementation of Islamic shariah and law after abolishment of the church)
going to come from?
Egyptian economist, Professor Samir Amin has gone on record as saying the
world needs a new (Communist) International. Let me say, I think
communism is an alternative to capitalism but what the world needs from
Britons is a new nation! We need more than a new newspaper or two that
addresses the concerns of the Muslim population, strives to create an
environment where Muslim schooling and Islamic universities are acceptable
in the eyes of all, and will represent the dominant religion of Britain.
The religiously affiliated, daily and weekly practitioners of religions in London,
especially and the UK and dominion generally are now swinging towards Islam.
Within twenty years the white British will be replaced by Pakistani Muslims.
The very same people who claim to rule us, the white British are now
becoming an ethnic minority in their own definition. Pakistani Muslims are
now the new, replacement majority, religious majority, religion etc. Why? The
white British are a racial category or an ethnic group (occupiers), whereas
Muslim Pakistanis are a modern religious current or tradition. The Muslim
country is ruled by justice and equity of Islam and so is associated with a
democracy, devoid of any tyrant or despotic ruler, whereas the Muslim

36

majority nation is like a democratic` republic, where other spheres of political

influence still exist such as political parties, though the word of Allah has not
necessarily become dominant just yet.
England, the place where the rules of the games of football, cricket and hockey
were written, and sportsmanship was written into the fabric of modern life,
now lies with more Muslim worshippers than Christian. When will the Queen
of England be a good sport, abdicate, and take her legal institutions and
courts with her?
We, as Muslims will not be happy unless and until we are free to not merely
practise but to practice our religion in this country. The acceptability of religion
is not that it is all acceptable but that it is all. If there are, at present between 4
and 5 million Catholics in the UK today and between 3 and 4 million Muslims, it
will not be long before there are more Muslims than Catholics in Britain.
Further, British authorities will have to admit the UK is not a Christian but a
Muslim country, starting with the NOMIS (National Office for Manpower
Information System, Office for National Statistics, UK).
In other words, it is a former Christian country, and it is basically (yet) to
become a Muslim country. It may well be the next UK census will show more
Muslims than Catholics by affiliation and more Muslims than all Christians by
practice and therefore will cede governance to Muslim hands, upon the
Queens abdication. As head of the failed Church surely this is her
responsibility, to ensure replacement takes place. These three terms express
Islams need to take over the British Isles. No one should ignore the desire of
all for the transference of sovereignty of UK from Christian to Muslim hands.
Indeed a political change is taking place in favour of Muslims in Britain. This is a
transfer of power and this we call transference. It is not simply practicability,
where there is an admission en masse of the overall ascendance of Islam and
Muslims over other religions (which is pertinent to the future of this and other
European countries). Nor is it a merely biological view of Islam and Christianity.
As a community here in the UK, we must stop trying to be relevant by saying
either that we are a culture or a civilisation, ie. an ethnicity or ethnic minority

37

or that we are a religion which is older than Judaism or Christianity. We are

neither a culture as opposed to nature nor a minority as opposed to a majority.
Indeed we will struggle to put forward an argument that we are trying to in
some circles where we are saying directly to the ahl e kitab that no you are not
ahl e qitaal, you are ahl e dhimmi. We are risking an air of conceit, superiority
and illness of temperance should we do this.
We have a very real chance here of obliterating the British empire, the Roman
empires main child, after America, in modern international politics.
Nevertheless we must see our hand is better than theirs. We must
acknowledge they are not our slaves, neither will they ever be. But they are
our beggars. Our equals in humanity who WILL bequeath the right to rule as a
religion over Britain and its dominion.
We will not invade Britain in a military sense. But in a society where there is
ongoing political transference (where the big players, be they white, British or
Christian) in the political lives of Muslims who by every right desire the power,
economic power or coming to power. We Muslims must accept that we should
expect more power.
We must refuse marginalisation at the hands our equals in humanity, or from
other religious or ethnic groups, rather than from our enemies, from whom,
we cannot continue to suffer. We do not really have to demand that the
Queen embrace Islam or that Jews, Christians are converted slowly. What we
need to do, generally, is accept that our community here lacks education, lacks
women in the workforce, lacks good skilled labour in the right jobs. To come to
power in Britain for the British Muslim is nothing. Here in our faith, deen e
Islam we must continually come to prayer and come to success!
The key issue of transference is, are we considering ourselves an internal
conceptualisation of religious values and of faith or do we, have a sense of
otherness in society? What I mean by this is not just are we dominant or is
someone else? But rather do we take a political rise for granted as opposed to
considering it as given to us by other powers?
Indeed our rise is granted us by Allah Almighty. Why? The fall of Christianity is
spelt out in

38

Maximum Muslim England

Capacity of Masjid

Number of
Masjids

Less than 50 people

50 to 100 people
101 to 200 people
201 to 300 people
301 to 400 people
401 to 500 people
501 to 750 people
751 to 1000 people
1001 to 2000 people
2000 to 4000 people
Greater than 4000 people
Not yet recorded

35
200
236
224
129
116
139
106
121
49
10
216

Number of congregants

1,750
40,000
94,400
134,400
103,200
116,000
104,250
106,000
242,000
196,000
80,000
108,000

Total
1,324,270
Unlike Christians, Muslims have in the UK, millions of congregants per week

39

the collapse of capitalism and the capitalist system. Christianism has committed
suicide, terrorist trinitarianism has killed itself.
Once we respect, for example, the Taliban, we will have respect for, indeed have
the utmost respect for the religion of Islam. The religion given to us people as Al
Islam is the reason to have respect. Today the English are recognising this power
and trying to fight it across the world. They cant, they are hereby made homeless
on the Islands from which they ruled of the planets lands.
Now we must recognise this, our power lies in their admission of guilt. Their suicide
is simply blaming themselves for their war, genocide and terrorism. To get them to
do this we must make them feel our pain.
The Italian peoples, in the Roman empire; the Greek peoples in the ancient Greeks,
the Spanish and Portugese etc in the Muslim Spain and the English in the British
empire, were all European or Western barbarians in history. They all achieved an
impact on history and were indeed a force on other peoples.
It is the Muslim outright domination of this last group or ethnicity, ie. the emerging
statistical religious majority of Muslims here in Britain which is of such great
significance as it is the only means by which, where historically only the Muslims of
London were granted Dar al Islam, now all of these groups, all of Europe and
indeed all of the world can come into the fold of Islam.
The Italian peoples, in the Roman empire; the Greek peoples in the ancient Greeks,
the Spanish and Portugese etc. in the Muslim Spain and the English in the British
empire, were all European or Western barbarians in history. They all achieved an
impact on history and were indeed a force on other peoples.
It is the Muslim outright domination of this last group or ethnicity, ie. the emerging
statistical religious majority of Muslims here in Britain which is of such great
significance as it is the only means by which, where historically only the Muslims of
London were granted Dar al Islam, now all of these groups, all of Europe and
indeed all of the world can come into the fold of Islam.
At present European Islam is largely in the Balkan areas of the various dar al
Islam countries of Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania, already mentioned. This

40

historical analysis then says, should it move into Spain, UK, Italy and Greece, it
will truly be a force to be reckoned with. In fact, if Britain should be conquered,
given Spain is still Muslim in the sense of dar al Islam, only the barbaric tribes
of the Romans and Greeks would remain as a historic force in Europe and the
West.

41

2.2 Baby Names

Regions within England and Wales and most popular name for that region.
Region

Name

North East
Jack
North West
Harry
Yorkshire and The Humber
Harry
East Midlands
Harry
West Midlands
Harry
East
Harry
London
Muhammad
South East
Harry
South West
Harry
Wales
Jacob
Most popular name by region 2012
Source: Office for National Statistics

There must be a ceding of power where schools are taught why, for example
Muhammad is our (as Britons) most popular name. This is replacement theory.
A theory of the actual and unexpected precedence and supercession of the
religion of Islam on Judeo- Christian heritage of Europe and America, nonMuslim ruled lands. It is a biological view of Islam overcoming Christianity.
We have a sort of democracy, we know how practical Islam is in our lives, now
we must believe in practicability. By practicability, I mean the relevance of
Islam in the West and that it is the only religion that can be implemented fully.
In other words that beyond Zahir (overt religion) and Batin (esotericism) is
something else that cannot be achieved outside of the religion. Another word
for megareligiousity. You can call it the unofficial religion, or the religion in
practice.

42

In din, when you are on the road, you must believe in freedom for Palestine,
not in Israel. In practice, in Pakistan not in Great Britain; in Urdu not in English.
Ultimately in the Holy Quran to read not in the Bible. In ourselves as Muslims
not in Christians. Indeed, we must practise to believe in India not America. We
must accept our fard (duty) as Muslims not just talk about Islam, religion and
domination.
Briefly, the Ummah in Britain has an identity which is like a political party with
no doubt a power of lobby and veto. We believe in a scholarly consultation and
concensus through the Shariah and the Holy books.
Muslims are freedom fighters and unitarianists. Not terrorists or trinitarianists.
At the moment, democratism is associated with dar al Islam, whereas if we
consider the potential we have for swamping the Western base of electoral
voters, it should be a little more right wing. In fact it is this view that Britain
brings with it our Islam, our Holy book, our Divine Sources, that is the problem.
We must return to being Muslim even if that means being conservative or
republican or basically fighting our way out. We must learn to neglect our
society if we can still manage to remember the present, past and future
governments and kingdoms on earth are only made by the heavenly people.
Half of the people of heaven will be from Ummah of the Prophet (SWS). This
tells us how being Ummati of Prophet (SWS) is right way to be.
To reiterate, our politics advocates Islamic socialism, much like the Pakistan
Muslim League (PML) in Pakistan. This may lead to a struggle with enemies and
we may claim to have earnt a harn fought victory from the fight. Nevertheless,
we must advocate a pure, unadulterated Islam. Not a version of it, Not a vision
of it, not a social form of it, and not a utilitisation of it nor a utilisation of it will
be acceptable let alone the half-way house we see today; a utilitarian Islam,
immersed in science to the neglect of religion, art to the neglect of The
Creator, faith to the neglect of, and this is the real reason Islam is coming to
overpower all other faiths, religious practice. Islam is a very practical religion. It
is also the real religion or the practised or most practised religion. Without this
admission there is no allowance for the mutuality of personal, social,

43

community, familial elements of religious life in practice. Each person is a

believer but do we admit to any sort of religiousness in our life?
Religion can be important in just about anyones life but do we come from a
religious family? And if we are from such a family, do we practise what we
preach? In London, Muslims will rule Christians, in America, Muslims will rule
Christians. Why? In London, Muhammad is the most popular name for baby
boys, and even in America, there may be a hundred million plus Christians by
name, but there is no relationship between them, their parents, their hearts
and the church. Niether are they political, they are dead in the heart. Islam in
the USA, on the other hand is a Dawud to the Jalut, a Musa to the Pharawn,
increasingly they are healthy, wealthy and wise and as such, because of the
interplay in Islam between family, society, culture and so on, they will
outnumber, overpower, and indeed outmanoeuvre Christians very quickly. This
spells the death of Judeo-Christian ethics in USA in this century or we could
even say this or the next generation. Why? Let me explain...........

44

2.3 The Filter A model

Ethics

Christianity

Too many single-parent families

Few church-goers on Sundays

religious

Fewer daily practitioners

believers in God

Few define themselves as

Few define themselves as

Filter 1: Left-side showing religious practice of families and right-side showing

surveyed humanist measures

The above filter shows how not only is Christianity failing in America but the
faith has very little faith in its roots. The left side shows how it is impracticable
for the future and the right how it is faithless and irreligious.
Together the two sides give four more dimensions to religion other than plain
affiliation. We could decide which religion the person is by affiliation but these
measures show also how much the religion is practised and also how much
that person really believes or how religious the person is.

45

The next diagram shows instead of the left and right filters, the primary and
secondary filters. Left and right show how religious practice and belief systems
are interwoven. Only if you have a right side (ie beliefs, attitudes, values etc)
can you rely on the left side. In Filter 2, the primary filter shows religion and
ethics become ultimately religious practice whereas the secondary filter has
the middle intersection, pictured below giving us religious praxis.
Ethics

Christianity

Few church-goers on Sundays

Single-parent families

Dont define themselves as religious

Dont define themselves as believers in God

Filter 2: Two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in American
life as philosophically from Christianity although practice may be different;
and secondly, the three stages of secondary filter or 2020 vision (or 2040 or
2060), which prove America is a Muslim country

46

This is the vision for 2020, the 2020 vision, or 2040 or 2060. That, in Britain,
France, Germany, America etc, Islam will overtake and replace Christianity as
the religion of the masses, the ethical praxis for life in the west.

47

2.4 The religion of Islam in America

(and the reproductive religious believers practitioners ratio)

Religious

Believer

Dualparent

American Judeo-Christianism- hundreds of millions of people who are as of

yet unconnected to anything.

What we are concerned about is the movement from religious relative

minority to majority. It all comes down to the notion of praxis. When a people
have a lot going on between themselves, their family, their society, their
language and their culture that is from their religion, you have a religious
praxis.
Religion then becomes ingrained in the very fabric of life: in the individual, the
family, the society, the language, the culture and thus is born civilisation. If we
look at the practice of the middle section or intersection as above who are
praying ie. attending a place of worship weekly, we find even in America, more
Muslim families are, as compared to Christian families.

48

Religious
Believer Dualparent

Islam in the USA- mere millions of people, heavily interactive at the personal,
social, political, religious levels.
Notice how close the middle bubble in diagram 2 is in size to diagram 1. The
day is coming it will grow bigger. In 2015 there are over 6 million Muslims in
America. In the next time of counting after say 10 years, thats around 2% of
the total population, officially more Muslims recorded in America than Jews.
Of the religious, believing, practising American dual-parent families, more are
Muslim than any other faith. My proof? The ratio is calculated first as a type of
productivity or specifically reproductivity ratio. In its own way, the religious
belivers ratio shows that of 50% of Americans who are Christian, only 3%
answer yes to the following questions as opposed to 4% being Muslims:
1. Do you believe in God?
2. Are you religious?
3. Do you attend a place of worship on a weekly basis?
4. Did both your parents bring you up?

49

Religious

Dual-parent
families

Believer
In God

Americans may have big circles as above but there is an insignificant

intersection between faith, religion, family life and of course, practice.
This tells us eventually Muslims will be in the majority as it gives a good idea as
to the trend of how the situation will change in the future.
This reveals the reproductive, believing, religious, practitioners of religions in
America are more often Muslim than not. Islam then is a sort of maximum if
not a majority.
Americas demise.....
2015 is indeed a year in which the UN agencies admit China may well have
overtaken America in the size of its economy. Nevertheless, the habits of the
Irish are a good example of the failings of the established church in Britain,
which applies well to moral and ethical life in America. In the seventies, in
Ireland, 90% of the people were Christian, 90% of whom were regularly
church-going.
Now, 40 years later only 25% of Ireland go to church this Sunday. USA shows a
similar low attendance.

50

Religious

Believer

Dualparent

The middle intersection of American Christians- 10 m.

Religious
Believer Dualparent

The middle intersection of Muslim Americans- 11 m.

I dont prophesise a new Israel in the Islam of the USA, rather a new
America. With only 5% or 10% nationals as Muslims, all of whom are devout,

51

faithful, mosque-going (or at least are or will be), and most important of all,
from stable families, America will be more Muslim than Jewish or Christian.
American politics is relevant to here in the UK as well. Republicanism, the
right-wing, described as neo-conservative, responsible for enforcing war on the
blessed poor across the world tells us it is enforcing democracy.
Given that the left-wing of American politics informed them to continue
warring, successive governments of Obama have failed to fulfil promises to
end their false-flag wars.
The Muslim peoples of USA can be a Muslim majority, associated with the
political right; or a Muslim country, associated with the political left, in the
eyes of the very same crusaders.
It is not the conservatism that Mr Bush, enemy of the respected people of the
land of Prophet Abrahams birth, shoved down our throats. Rather it is the
democratism which is nearer, for now to what is Islamic. Wherever Muslims
live in the world, first we must do away with the Tony Blairs and Barack
Obamas then live according to Shariah. Having done that, it may become
important for us to denounce, in the UK, the Queen and the institution of
royalty, and only then can we become a Muslim country where the word of
God is utmost. Foremost is that the political will of the respected peoples is
carried out.
As for the accusation that Muslims are fanatical terrorists, in the last century,
only Christians had the monopoly on Fascism, Nazism (and indeed
Communism). Terrorists were born in Ireland we all know. As Muslims we
dont ask for democracy to be given to us on a plate nor for the Queen to
abdicate, rather we are associated with left-wing political views. Indeed the
whole argument only gives precedence to the fact that should we become
majority what would we do with the legal institutions if we were right-wing or
conservative?
Democracy is a Muslim invention. Many scholars have said democracy comes
from the Ijma or consensus form of Islamic legislation.

52

Personally, and given the increased use of Islam as a legal religion in the west, I
say the notion of voting in the team with the most support comes from dar al
Islam itself (like when there are more Muslims in a land than non-muslims) or
Muslim majority.
I say this because having read Aflatoon (Plato) and Arastu (Aristotle) etc. there
is no mention of democracy only republics.
So Democratism and democracy, which sound similar to dar al islam, come
from either:
1. Shaoorahum fil amri mentioned in the Quran as relevant when there
are hypocrites to be dealt with, it is necessary to know how to take
advise and counsel in ones matters whether one is a person, community
or a state, as in the need for the Prophet (PBUH) to take advice in
matters dealing with the munafiqun and their jihad.
2. The concept of Dar al Islam where a country is deemed Muslim such as
Muslim Spain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Southern France (Iberia
together) and we should not just think ruled by Muslims for almost a
thousand years but actually enjoyed Muslim majority and Muslim
government whilst including Jewish and Christian people.
3. Ijma The scholarly source of Islamic legislature, in communal
consensus, which along with the Quran and sunnah, and qiyas or
analogical reasoning; form the sources of the Divine Shareeah.

Islam is the main religion for America

I hold the claim that Americans are without a culture, a religion or a language
of their own. This invites the question as to how the neo-conservative lobby in
the USA manages to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people in different
countries of the world and get away with it, and no one seems to want to do
anything about it.
What needs to be said from here is that what prevails in America is in fact, a
perversion of Muslim culture. Like slavery.

53

The filter shows how, because half of the populous is lost in each stage of the
filter for Christianity, it is actually a great big lie. 40 something percent will say
that they attend their Church regularly when the attendance doesnt figureonly half of that are at Church according to their figures in the week.
Thus 50%, becomes 25% are practising weekly, which becomes 12.5% are from
nuclear families, which becomes 6.25% are considered believers, which
becomes 3.125% are considered religious. So only 10m are in fact considered
religious believers from regularly practising families (should the overall US
population reach 350 m and the figures dont deteriorate).
For Muslims, almost all (In fact 80%) are going through the filter. At each stage,
if 7 million in 2001 becomes 14 million for 2014, should this double again,
about 11m are in fact considered religious believers from regularly practising
families.

When will Americans practise the religion of Islam more than Christianity?
It can be expected of areas like Illinois, Florida, California or New Jersey to have
as many more practitioners in the Islamic faith than any other by 2020, but
what about for America as a whole?
Well if the Muslim population doubles and redoubles it would mean mosque
numbers would have to be ten times as big. In such a situation, for Islam to
have more faithful in America, they would need to double congregations, with
mosques offering two or more services at each prayer.
This could be as soon as in our lifetimes. With the spread of secularism across
Europe likely to contaminate the figures for the states, Islam is most likely to
take over Christianity in this generation. The 50 million Sunday worshippers
could be replaced by Friday worshippers, as Christian worship is likely to fall in
number, perhaps even halve, whereas the millions of Muslims who go to
Mosque in America on Friday will only rise to many more millions.
This will mean for Islam to be a relative majority religion in America, the many
hundreds of thousands of churches in America will need to be succeeded by

54

the building of tens of thousands of Mosques. Mosque numbers themselves

double every 10-20 years as well.
For now the praxis of religious and ethical life in America will go from Christian
to Muslim, and it is only a matter of time before the official statistics show
more Muslim adherents (congregants) in the USA than Christian. It will happen
in this generation, or the very next generation.
Sometimes, what we all want to know, and a question that we all ask at one
time or another, is Why are Americans so disconnected to morality and
ethical understanding?. The answer is in fact, quite simple. The Holy Quran is
in all fact the Holy Book we should all read instead of the Bible. It is the
instruction manual for life as we know it. Basically to answer this point we
need to understand ethics in the USA comes from so-called Christianity. For
those of us who believe the future religion and ethics is Islam and that in actual
factual, heavenly guidance is to be found in The Holy Quran, we may call this
Christianism or whatever.
The fact is that in the States, although many claim to attend churches, there
are in actual fact very few church-goers now. Another reason for moral decay
is that there are no families anymore due to single-parent families becoming
the norm. Another reason is these people dont define themselves even as
religious. Lastly, if they do attend a church, come from a dual-parent family
and claim to be religious, they dont themselves define themselves as believing
in God.
The Holy Quran says,
O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about
Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a
messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul
[created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And
do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God.
Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens
and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs.
The Holy Quran 4:171

55

These points show two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianism although, in practice it may
be different. Secondly, the three points of the chasm between the claims (the
lies) and the facts (the truth) prove, in their economic, social and political
implications that America is to be a Muslim country.
Briefly the two angles I mentioned are indicative of praxis. What is praxis? How
is it different from lay ethics or general psychology? Can American christianism
based in non-catholicism be transferred into and replaced by militant, political
and intellectual Islam. Yes, in a matter of decades.
The idea of praxis is a concept which says that well, if the US army or armed
forces do XYZ and the church says its wrong, it is deemed wrong but nothing
will happen of it unless and until it is not prevented from materialising into
action. Unless the ethics is action, there is no praxis.
Let me explain. Modern USA has a shelf life, a sell-by date: 2080. The UK will be
relatively majority Muslim by 2060. The USA too, similarly, will have more
mosque-goers than non-catholic church-goers by 2080.
Why??
Non-reproductiveness.
We all say Americanism is destructive, obsessed with consumerism, no longer
the worlds biggest production power-house. Now? America is home to nonreproduction. No, its not to do with the inequality of distribution or economic
resource allocation on its own. Its a simple fact, they are either:
Gay
Divorced
Porn addicts
Premaritally sexually active
Celibate

56

Paedophiles
Adulterous
Use birth control
Etc.
When it comes to the ethics of reproduction and reproductive biology, it can
be seen that knowing which religious grouping is sexually reproductive is
something like knowing which religious group will ultimately survive over the
other.
The units of the human being as an organism tell us increasingly more about
the members of the human race: The family, the individual and the religious
grouping or circle. The greater the overlap, the higher the chance of ultimate
survival. The first question is one of reproductive biology, the second is one of
religiousness and the third is one of religious faith in a Supreme Being. All of
these point to one question, who actually practises more?
Given that the answer overall is Islam, the first three questions must be
rephrased in Islamic terminology:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Iqtisaad
Maasharat
Siyasat
Infiraadi haqooq o faraaiz

Indeed the idea of personal religious obligation or Fard gives rise to these
three areas of internal obligations or religiousity:
1. Daily worship (Aqeeda)
2. Weekly worship (Ibadaat)
3. Annual total (Rasm)
If 3 is equated with figures for affiliation, we can see Muslim or Christian is in a
sense, a question of Eid or Christmas. Christianism is mere culture as 1 and 2,
are more in the religion of Islam in the UK.

57

Ethics comes from revelatory ethics and from ethics we derive law. However
the Holy Book of Divine guidance for Americans by 2080 will be the Holy book
of The Holy Quran, Gods last revelation to humanity, revealed to Prophet
Muhammad (SWS) and not the Bible....

58

2.5 The future statistical convergence of Muslim and Christian populations

in UK and USA

Muslim majority UK in non-Muslim ruled land

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

Islam
Christian
Total

The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in UK in 2061 (in millions)

59

Muslim majority America in non-Muslim ruled land

50
40
30

Islam

20

Christianity

10
0
2020

2040

2060

2080

The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in America in 2060 (in
millions). Assuming Christians excludes Catholics and adherents are
measured by number of congregants.

It is probable the next census will reveal more practising Muslims than
Christians in the UK. Further it is possible by 2041 or 2051 the census will show
more lay Muslims than lay Christians. I am assuming the Muslim population
continues its trend over the last three censuses to double, again.

60

Thus we can prove mathematically a sequence of transference and

replacement of the religion of USA and UK into an eventual Dar al Islam in UK
and a religious majority in USA:
TIMELINE OF PROGRESSION
2nd religion or minority
2001- average daily practitioners
2011- average weekly practitioners
now
2021- annual congregants (estimate)
2031204120511st Religion or majority (estimate)
2061RULE OF ISLAM
We could easily map the progress of Islam in the UK on to the American
population:
now 2nd religion or minority
2020- average daily practitioners (estimate)
2030- average weekly practitioners (estimate)- over catholicism
2040- average weekly practitioners (estimate)- over non- catholic christianity
20502060- annual congregants (estimate)
2070- Most practiced faith

61

In 2001, the British showed more daily worshippers in Islam, ie our daily bread
became Islam; in 2011, the British showed more weekly observance of Islam as
per congregants in Mosques in the capital and in 2041 it is expected to be
made a public fact of public life, that adherents of Islam outnumber all other
faiths in London. All this additional data proves is that by 2061 there will be
more people admitting Islam as the faith than Christianity.

62

2.6 How will the world manage, economically?- Economic equality and
equilibrium
World equilibrium and global equality
Lets look at the present macroeconomic inequality at present:
1. The far east is too overpopulated, perhaps too is the Muslim Ummah.

Land and population distribution

Source: Basics of mega-economics - Hrant Bagratyan
2. Muslims are too poor

Distribution of the economies, 2008

Source: Basics of mega-economics - Hrant Bagratyan
Nevertheless, this country, like other Christian countries are on their way down
the list of GDP countries due to their lack of growth. The world wars, 1, 2, and
now a possible third mountain. If we see the debt, in the UK:

63

USA:

Here we see an economy of civil and world wars 1, 2, 3 etc.

64

The Asian economic miracles, Pakistan, India and China

Pakistan will overtake Britain in the size of its economy as per GDP (PPP). Jim
O Niel, who coined the BRICS, says Pakistan will be 18th biggest country in the
world by GDP (PPP). So this is the GDP as per the First world. Remember if

65

we take account of variations in the value of money (ie use PPP) we still ignore
the fact that some countries have small cities where things are cheaper still.
Pakistan has a GDP (PPP) of almost 10 trillion, like Brazil. Interestingly, above it
are the other Asian tiger economies, Malaysia, Hong Kong, etc and below it are
Iran, Turkey as well as France, Germany etc.
In peace is written the historical destiny of the enlightened future of the
blessed country of Pakistan, an economic miracle. Our destiny is of economic,
military, social and religious ascendency and domination over all European
peoples, by 2050. We are the policemen stopping European economies from
challenging the top 20 economies of the world.
Pakistan and the future generation The enlightened future of an economic
miracle
This theory spells the rise of Pakistan as a superpower through its goal of
ascendancy and domination. It may grow to be the largest of all Muslim
countries. Through a battle against deprivation and not just the unjust
assertion of the religion of the Muslim Pakistanis was formed the nation of
Pakistan, and so Pakistans creation till now we, as Muslim Pakistanis seek to
save ourselves from deprivation and not to unnecessarily assert religious rights
of self or other.
Citigroup predict, in 2050:
GDP (PPP):
1. India: $85.97 trillion
2. China: $80.02 trillion
3. United States: $39.07 trillion
4. Indonesia: $13.93 trillion
5. Brazil: $11.58 trillion
6. Nigeria: $9.51 trillion

66

7. Russia: $7.77 trillion

8. Mexico: $6.57 trillion
9. Japan: $6.48 trillion
10. Egypt: $6.02 trillion.
Followed by: Korea/Taiwan/Hong Kong/Singapore (4 Asian Tigers)
Vietnam
Philippines
Bangladesh
Pakistan
GDP per capita:
Singapore's per capita income is estimated by Knight Frank and Citi Private
Wealth's 2012 Wealth Report to be the highest in the world at $56,532 in
2010, measured by purchasing power parity. Norway follows at $51,226, then
the U.S. ($45,511), Hong Kong ($45,301) and Switzerland ($42,470). (The
International Monetary Fund listed Singapore 3rd in the world in 2010-11 by
per capita GDP, behind Qatar and Luxembourg, which weren't included in the
Knight Frank report).
By 2050, the Wealth Report estimates the world's wealthy citizens will be
dominated by Asia: Singapore ($137,710), Hong Kong ($116,639), Taiwan
($114,093) and South Korea ($107,752). The only western economy projected
to remain in the top five is the U.S., with an estimated per capita income of
$100,802.
- CNN

Theoretically, we could place the first, second and third worlds on a historical
timescale and relate their importance in this way. Accordingly, Pakistan and
India would, for example, take preference, in terms of development etc, over,
say, China or America, where 4.5% of the world has usurped 19.5% of the

67

worlds wealth. The American one percent will take a correction by future
religion. It is strange how they are rich and control so much. In fact they,
Americans, have amassed a fifth of the worlds wealth in terms of economic
resources, contrary to some depictions of the one percent having half or a
third of everything etc:
O mankind, fear your Lord, who created you from one soul and created
from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and women.
And fear Allah , through whom you ask one another, and the wombs.
Indeed Allah is ever, over you, an Observer.
The Holy Quran 4:1

If modernity or mercantilism has taught us any lesson it is that the export of

middle-classism is fruitful economically for humanity as a collective, and it
comes at a cost. We went to space at the cost of nuclear war, now we are
middle-class, at the cost of megamurder; to prove the first we see USSR
achieving and USA costing us, but the second is the fruit of countries like India
and Pakistan, economies like China, Malaysia and Indonesia, who will rise
above the first world economically despite being third world by most peoples
current definition.
For the greater part of the last century, more people were Indian than any
other nation amongst humanity. Indeed more Muslims were Indian than any of
other nation in the world. Now through Pakistani Mujahid struggle and Chinese
liberation struggle, the world will witness that even USSR and USA would be
content to be middle-class people, and worldly megamurder will dissipate.
Indeed the historical significance of being a victim of megafamine for India will
never and should never be denied.
The poor countries remain, of an authoritarian governance system, but in
terms of megasystems, murder will inshallah be eradicated from them as well
as from the rich. Whoever the USA invades is no longer seen as bad, rather
who USA doesnt murder is seen as evil and away from the cause. Whoever

68

puts the world first not second, like China or third, like India, is perceived
through the concepts of zuhad and tawadhu to be innately evil. Whomsoever
puts the Creator of all of the creatures first is pure and good.
A Quantitative theory of developmental economics
After study of both normative economics and the science of developmental
economics, it is clear a system or a method for the gradation of economies,
economic systems and indeed countries is required. Earlier, I suggest the older
and wiser the people of a country are the more they would have developed
their economic endeavour.

An Islamic model for economic enterprise is founded on solid social principles

and this is the grounding for my theory. Whereas age is considered as a
possible cause of the ideology of money ie wealth, it is dismissed and it is size
which is of most importance causally.
We can say that neither age nor wealth nor money causes economic activity.
Indeed it is people who do. So, assuming no diminishing returns, India or
China, being the only countries in the world with billions of people, should be
the biggest economies of the world, in the future.

Economic activity

Size of an economy

69

That means the new world order should be rephrased as the top 3 economies
of today reverse their positions. So USA, China.... become China, India and
America.
2012
1.CHN
2.USA
3.IND
4.JPN
5.DEU

1
2
3
4
5

USA
China
India
Japan
Germany

2014
16,244,600
14,802,942
6,354,588
4,543,515
3,434,191

China
USA
India
Japan
Germany

Approx. 18t
Approx. 17t
Approx. 7t
Approx. 5t
Approx. 3t

Table showing China as the new head of economically developed countries

The obligation to, the fairness for the poor and the rights of all of society, and
then all of the world should not be ignored. Further there should be wealth for
all continents in the world, Nigeria and Indonesia, for example should spread
wealth to Africa and so on. Wealth should not be restricted to Europe on its
own.
The subjugation and domination of even all European and American peoples
by the religion of Islam is possible too.
The superceding of China, in its population size over other countries,
particularly India (for some two hundred years) and its recent overtaking of all
other countries in terms of its economic power (particularly over the States),
inspite of the European and American countries having more economic power
(GDP) in terms of the individuals in those countries, shows how Islam is rising
to do the job of the subjugation and domination of European and American
peoples.
It is the dar al Islam and religious majority in some parts of Europe (Bosnia,
Kosovo and Albania) and is also now a religious majority in other countries in
Europe when participative measures of religion are taken. Very soon, in a
matter of decades, USA too, will have a religious majority similar to UKs (when

70

adherents or congregants are measured) where an Islamic religious majority

and thus dar al Islam are emerging or have emerged already.
Indeed, the supercession of the religion of Islam in the USA (which will take
place in a handful of decades) will mean al Islam has taken over as the outright
religion of the world and has in other words spread throughout the world.
Living here in Britain it is of less use, to involve ourselves in Dengs economic
reforms or the peaceful rise of China. No doubt the economic success over the
last decades and for this decade and for the coming decades in China is
immense, a greater historical achievement than European or American
economics ever made. Nevertheless the transference of power or the
transference of religious power here in the Uk (from christianists to Muslims) is
what I shall focus on here.
Much as I have written on London boroughs swaying towards Islam and
Muslim majority status, the MCB, if we study their publications on the census
and Islam in Britain, do not mention Muslims, boroughs or anything. They talk
about political constituencies. This means how many Muslim candidates are
representing the people as well as what kind of people are based in these
constituencies as per faith practices.
What we must accept here is that there is no division in Islam between Islam
(ie. Religion) and politics (ie. Local or governmental). Christianism is distinct
from the religion of Jesus and the Apostles as it is non-montheistic and nonAbrahamic. It is founded on there being dissonance between the religious and
non-religious leadership. Where we as Muslims are more interested in how
many mosques are we building to support the work of our leadership in our
communities and to support the growth of our communities, Allah is testing us
by interesting us in power, prestige and status.
This chart, below, shows how truly Great cultures or civilisations such as
mentioned in Divine texts of Abrahamic faiths, have made economic
systems and destroyed them, replacing them with more humane ones, the
most humane of all being dar al islam.

71

Economic system

Problematic
metaphor

Islamic solution
(Diagnosis)

Cure

Communism

Inequality

Wealth is a trust
from God

Generosity

Socialism

Iniquity

100% circulation
of wealth

Forgiveness

Capitalism

Irreligiousity

Hoarding of
assets is
prohibited

Egalite

Table showing the causes, diagnoses and cure of the post-mercantile

condition

Post-mercantile or neomercantile economics

Post- mercantile economics focuses on secondary and tertiary production and
the concept of wealth not just money. This concerns the 3rd world as much as
the so-called 1st world. It uses a quantitative approach as regards the wealthdriven and sees money-driven economics as slave-driving or slave-driven. We
note economics is not differentiated age-wise, so there is little regard between
true economics and slave-driven economics in the sense of classifying
economic systems age-wise.
Ideally there is an improvement in the sense that zakat on wealth is peaceful
whereas tax on money or income is warmongery. Post-mercantilism rejects the
use of colonial arrogance and aggression as well as failing UN, UK, US, NATO,
IMF etc. protection. In this sense it is against extreme economic forms, as well
of course as in the sense of public versus private or state ownership. It finds a
balance between both oppression versus rigid controls on the one hand, and
market forces versus governance on the other. The result is the end of the
foggy notion of the superiority of first world over second over third world.

72

In the future Islamic economies will be the only First world and the capitalists
will be relegated to the present Second world. The third world will be
destroyed as a term and it will no longer be relevant to any countries as such.
Examples of countries estimated change in GDP and relative GDP between
2012 and 2019:
Country
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Albania
Albania
Algeria
Algeria
Argentina
Argentina
Australia
Australia
Austria
Austria
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Belgium
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Brazil
Brazil
Canada
Canada
China
China
Denmark

2012
1,033.59
0.04
1,326.47
0.031
15,843.02
0.329
2,163.00
0.883
1,501.33
1.155
307.004
0.426
53.968
0.115
375.881
0.499

2019
2,057.32
0.043
1,994.36
0.031
24,752.60
0.338
11,180.22
0.784
2,096.67
1.092
378.954
0.365
93.87
0.12
445.354
0.422

25.734

37.6

0.038
4,392.09
2.803
1,819.97
1.77
51,947.01
14.72
1,825.58

% diff
0.003
0
0.009
-0.099
-0.063
-0.061
0.005
-0.077

0.036 -0.002
7,783.55
2.653 -0.15
2,412.78
1.605 -0.165
99,027.47
18.477 3.757
2,254.15

73

Denmark
Germany
Germany
Greece
Greece
India
India
Indonesia
Indonesia
Islamic Republic
of Iran
Islamic Republic
of Iran
Iraq
Iraq
Ireland
Ireland
Israel
Israel
Italy
Italy
Nigeria
Nigeria
Malaysia
Malaysia
Morocco
Morocco
Pakistan
Pakistan
Russia
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Turkey

0.25
2,666.40
3.804
193.347
0.327
101,132.80
5.748
8,229,439.40
1.446

0.216 -0.034
3,307.19
3.246 -0.558
226.487
0.289 -0.038
234,478.59
6.779 1.031
17,491,703.74
1.677 0.231

6,793,170.00

29,881,769.97

1.138
251,907.66
0.292
163.938
0.224
993.365
0.313
1,566.91
2.179
41,061.32
0.534
941.238
0.594
828.169
0.203
20,090.86
0.657
61,810.80
2.986
2,752.33
1.068
1,415.79

0.993
431,410.70
0.376
202.569
0.2
1,453.86
0.308
1,798.05
1.77
84,216.24
0.658
1,592.81
0.651
1,366.26
0.223
44,430.19
0.68
104,322.03
2.696
3,495.80
1.106
2,762.95

-0.145
0.084
-0.024
-0.005
-0.409
0.124
0.057
0.02
0.023
-0.29
0.038

74

Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
United Arab
Emirates
United Arab
Emirates
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United States
United States

1.332
100.218
0.058

1.308 -0.024
266.436
0.086 0.028

1,409.50

1,919.63

0.307
1,567.17
2.78
16,244.58
19.511

0.319 0.012
2,109.25
2.551 -0.229
22,089.99
18.216 -1.295

Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database,

April 2014

All the Muslim countries, UAE, KSA, Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, Malaysia,
Morocco, Iraq, Afghanistan and Algeria will increase their share of World GDP
(only Iran, Bosnia and Turkey have decreased shares). All of the non-Muslim
countries, US, UK etc will have less in output with the exception of China and
India.

75

Chapter 3- The religion of Islam in the UK and USA II

3.1 Outcast America
The decimation of America through the decimation of its system of allies is
taking place today. Today, we find America and all its rich friends are attacking
the blessed land of Ash Shaam. It occurs to me, and I note that our neighbour
from across the Atlantic Ocean is outcast from the land of Prophet Adam (AS),
Prophet Noah (AS) and Prophet Ibrahim (AS) by losing the war of Iraq. Even if
she should be expelled from Ash Shaam, which I pray America will be, she will
be outcast of the lands of Prophet Dawud (AS) and Sulaimaan (AS) as well.
In other words, like the first man was outcast from heaven, American forces
will be outcast from the Holy Land as they see it. No doubt they will admit once
that has happened that we are being fair when we swear that there is no God
but Allah and that Muhammad (SWS) is His Messenger and fight for the word
of God to be utmost in the land.
The dismantling of the American war machine is taking place through the
dismantling of its system of allies. America as most of the world

50
40
30

Islam

20

Christianity

10
0
2020

2040

2060

2080

The rise of the Islamic faith in America- Millions of congregants per week
knows has invaded Iraq and Afghanistan for periods of around 10 years. In
both cases in fact they are still there. The world wars combined lasted for
shorter than these wars individually.

76

This asymmetric war-bent people are obsessed with cold, world, just,
permanent, perpetual war. What is less well known is that they being
evangelical and neo-conservative should have invaded Britain, at least that
way, the UK would have more Christians than Muslims.
This is obviously their only interest, religious terrorism. Logically, Fascism
comes from Catholics and Nazism from Protestants. So they, Americans are
Nazis, well, failed Nazis. As it is Britain has been conquered by the Islamic faith.
In France and Germany too, the main religion being practised is Al Islam. The
top three American allies then have been proselytised into Al Islam. America
itself has been declared as the height of all evil and the greatest threat to
humanitys survival as well as the systems of economic production and
biological reproduction.

80
60
Christianism

40

Islam

20

Total
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050

The rise of the Islamic faith in Britain - Millions of congregants per week
Saudia Arabia and Pakistan, countries which are 100% Muslim, are left, as well
as Japan, to serve on the list of Americas allies as Imperialists. Other than this,
Turkey, which is no longer an ally of Israel and instead MPs wear Muslim
hijab and so on, may well be the only major power which doesnt fight America
or doesnt try to hamper American interests.

77

3.2 The insignificance of Christianism

The practical denunciation of the Christianist faith by Great Britain and
therefore the common wealth, have served to enforce a slogan of no war
on the poor. War is the health of the States and its cause is the wealth that it
has usurped from the rest of the respected peoples of the world. Not only are
there many countries who subscribe to the imperialist design (eg. in Africa, the
Carribean and the Pacific) but of the top 20 richest countries of the world half
are part of British dominion.
Nevertheless, the number of active Muslims in London, for example, is much
greater than the number of Christians. Scores more on a daily basis, almost
twice as many on a weekly basis, if C of E is considered on its own, and no less
on a monthly or annual basis. Why then are we not allowed to be Earls,
Viscounts or Dukes? Why then, the Queen and Western and other
institutions? Why do the people use this absurd calendar or pray for daily
bread (from the lords prayer) when it is statistically absurd to occupy and
continue occupying these, as well as other lands?
I read recently about a British public school banning bearded pupils. This
meant their being coerced to shave (ie. threatened) and eventually barred
from outside contact (ie from classroom) for the 6 and a half hours duration of
the school day. Its not as if you are allowed to ask them why they dont
worship God Almighty with compassion instead of the false Jesus, after all,
Fascism and Nazism is all they own. They act as if, as Muslims we have a
monopoly on terror. No sir! As Christians you have the monopoly on Fascism
and Nazism. Thats historical fact.
And why? Because of your religious fanaticism or fundamentalism, ie. Violent
extremism. Christ, you say died a bloody death! Why dont you sympathise
with communists or do something nice for once? That would make a bloody
change!

Every soul will taste death, and you will only be given your *full+ compensation
on the Day of Resurrection. So he who is drawn away from the Fire and

78

admitted to Paradise has attained [his desire]. And what is the life of this world
except the enjoyment of delusion.
The Holy Quran 3:185

79

3.3 The liberation of Uk

Nonetheless, we have seen the beginning of the entrance of the Muslims into
the British royalty and nobility. Too, what has happened in the UK is a story of
the people gradually denouncing the wicked church, the Queen and so on and
accepting as Ash Shaoob (literally The peoples), the right of legitimacy of
Allah Subhanaha wa ta Ala (literally, God, Glorious and Exalted be His
mention).
It is perhaps true that we are yet to be Mosque-builders or people of an
established Mosque-going nature, in the sense that neither are the Muslims of
the UK, nor the people at large, a splinter of any Rome or any Khalifat of the
Muslim Ummah as a whole, and neither is it practicable to be a part of the
establishment given that there is no official clergy working effectively in our
religion.
It is also true that the present corrupt system bares no heed to our (ie. As
Muslims) pressing need for domination of the system or the institutions such
as royalty and legal structures, yet we deserve respect above both Catholicism
(around one million adherents weekly) and Protestantism (church of England
figures reveal only 900,000 weekly adherents) .
It is no longer a question of the church and the state, it is now Islam and the
state. In Europe and soon to be in America, Australia and so on. Nevertheless,
political life is maintained under the guidance of the Shariah.
It is not a question anymore of a division between church and state, now Islam
and the state, but increasingly here in Europe, there is a divorce between the
concepts of statehood and the people.
Somehow, we practise Islam yet our official religion is something else. As it
stands, what with the lacite policy of the west to divide religion and statehood,
Islam is the unofficial religion, but we are living with a non-Muslim system.

80

3.4 Colonialism
Colonialism (Al Istemar in Arabic) is defined by slavery as well as the invasion
and occupation of foreign lands by the so-called European peoples. In fact they
have no real linguistic, cultural nor religious right on Europe itself, although we
are not only dealing with this point here.
The best example of the colonial dream and the worst example of humanity
was the cause of the starved generation of the Pak-indo sub-continent before
the creation of Pakistan.
Even today the people of the sub-continent are dropping like flies by the
million due to enforced famine and starvation. When Pakistan was created in
1947 with a population of around 30 million, some 50 million had already
perished due to the British enforced famine through the invasion and
occupation of the British over the preceding two centuries.
The dispossession of life through the dispossession of staple foods to my
people remained a constant factor in maintaining the infidel alliance between
hindus and Christians and their theft of Muslim India. Just like in the Americas,
Columbus was busy megamurdering natives and Africans alike, the occupiers
of Muslim India were slaying millions of people indigenous to the Pak subcontinent by the dispossession of food and water.
The starved people could only beg then to the point that the overt policy was
that we should fall with one hand on the British loins when really their both
hands were around our neck. A deliberate policy was undertaken at
government level to withhold grain and any cheap staple from Indians, those
being at the time of the invasion of the east india co. Muslim Indians of the
Muslim India too.
Of this country of some 300 million almost 20% of that had perished of the
preceding generation. These are named the starved generation. Starved to
death by the British. Why? So Brits could grow fat and keep England. Did it
work? NO!
It is shocking to note the statistic, that when Muslim India was invaded by the
British, it had a population of some 150 million. In 200 years, instead of

81

contributing to the Muslim way of life and the truth of Islam as the last Divine
religion on earth, they savagely and barbarically killed some 35% of the first or
second largest country on earth.
They brutally murdered 50 million innocent Muslim Indians when they
themselves were barely 35-40 million in number. It was a non-stop exhibition
of wanton atrocity that was, along with slavery of Africans, the joy of
colonialism.

82

3.5 Neo-colonialism and decolonialism

The revolutionary praxis of decolonialism is suggested as the solution to
societys problems and the ills of materialism. However whereas Islamic
socialism says this revolutionary alternative is purely Marxist, the people of the
countries of the west have voiced their opinion to the effect that it is a
religious change that is to be executed. One that swings governance of society
from Christianism to Islam. When we look at history we see that from the
European peoples history, with the exception of the central Al Andalus Muslim
kingdom, Muslims have been attacked by western violent extremism and
world war, inventions of Christians. Now, we must have the self-realisation of
our potential and for our self-actualisation we must exert our utmost selves
and turn this into love and affection if we so desire, for example, that British
children, in British schools, those being Muslim by majority, should have the
freedom to have even their holidays according to their religion.
The Islamic model of peace shows us how all facets of society in Islam, for
example economics, is the highest of the economic systems known to man,
whereas America is the lowest of the low. What do Americans do to value and
rent? They war by ending all value as well as all human values. Above and
beyond being rent-destroying, usa actually destroyed the atom which the
universe consists of, in order to borrow more from the lenders in order to
finance the murder of the same lenders.
Here, we have won the war against American religious inaction, down to
economic and financial inaction. We have won the battle for American hearts
and minds, not just have we won over the land, but the households, the
families, the businesses, the corporations, but the NGOs etc who make up the
land.
And do not be like the ones who became divided and differed after the clear
proofs had come to them. And those will have a great punishment.
The Holy Quran 3:105

83

3.6 Statehood as atavism or antiquity

Do not become confused with Marxism and its idea of fighting the unjust
power of internal oppression, social suppression or cultural repression etc is a
move from mercantilism (characterised by international free market
protectionism) to post-mercantilism (characterised by post-feudalism). It is not
both are forms of serfdom and serve the interests of pan-world-ism and
globalisation. Scientific socialism and socialism, be it Islamic, can only serve to
change the basic factors of production and distribution etc, it has a negative
effect on protectionism, war and the level of centrality of command in a
government. This is due to the innate evil of the globalist drive at its and
capitalisms very plight and fight.
Do not confuse the inferiority of a prophet of Allah (which is being always
inferior to Allah) with a mans inferiority before another man. Do not confuse
the Islamic monotheism of belief in One God with the idea that doing good and
benefitting others with ones good works and social welfare are somehow
fighting the system.
The Marxist idea of exploitation was a shift from slave-driven to wealth-driven
economics. Values changed as people realised that the Muslim Prophets who
Jews and Christians alike, so admired, were actually relatively hard-up, made a
profit from their own hands work and shared in that.
Although this was described as simplicity of life, humbleness and
abstentiousness by some, it was for the ahlekitabs concept of challenging
exploitation en masse, yet was never removed from the religion or Divine
simplicity of Islam.
Capital, profit and expenses, and assets and liabilities accounts show a
different picture than income and expenditures and assets and liabilities and
equity changes in financial statements. Marxism, like capitalism shows a
fixation with capital and an ignorance of economics and accounting due to the
ignorance of the purposes of profit:
1. Personal
2. Social

84

In our society we are taught to earn an honest wage. But are we really
deserving of it? We are obsessed with financing ourselves at the cost of others
when we should see the harmony between conventional uses of profit such as
financing and re-enacting what we do ourselves, and Zakat.
For Marx the object or commodity is an object of fetishisation, for me it is the
subject of sacrifice. Zakat, unlike the refinancing of sales can be used to cover
losses. Indeed it is a reason to have created a governing state and works in the
service of God and His creatures. Nonetheless it is a form of magnanimity or
philanthropy.

85

3.7 Religious ratios

Ratios for religiousness, belief and participation in family and religious life:

RRB RATIO

UK
MUSLIM

WEEKLY
PARTICIPATION

DAILY
OBSERVANCE
IN PLACES OF
WORSHIP

2
CHRISTIAN
USA
MUSLIM
CHRISTIAN

Table showing RRB ratio and participation

The value of p of the general population is the nearest percentile of the

general population. So, for example, the p for daily observance as measured by
congregations in places of worship is taken, we have twice in Islam as for
Christianity, as the value of p is 2 for Islam and 1 for Christianity. In short, the
religious obligation on a daily basis, in Britain is to practise Islam, whereas in
America, it is still to participate in going to Church on the weekend, for now, in
the UK, the participative religious activity is very soon going to be Mosque on
Friday.
CENSUS
FIGURE
UK
MUSLIM

WEEKLY
PARTICIPATION

DAILY
OBSERVANCE
IN PLACES OF WORSHIP
2

86

2
CHRISTIAN
USA
MUSLIM
CHRISTIAN

30

30

Table showing religion and participation

Daily Weekly RRB Census

ISLAM
CHRISTIANITY

ISLAM

CHRISTIANITY

30

30

UK

USA

Percentile practising religious participation in Islam and Christianity

87

UK graph

Islam
Christian
Other -INSIG.

Daily

Weekly

Ratio

Census

Charting the change of daily observance, weekly attendance, RRB ratio and
the official census population in the UK
USA graph
35
30
25
20
Islam
15

Christianity

10
5
0
Daily

Weekly

Ratio

Census

Charting the change of daily observance, weekly attendance, RRB ratio and
the official census population in the USA

88

In the case of UK, USA, they still go more to the church in the week than the
mosque. However without the spurt at the end, perhaps Uk and Usa are evenly
split between Muslims and Christians, a half-way house.
The people are on an even keel between Islam and Christianity. In terms of the
raw data plus weekly worship, we are still following Christianity but in terms of
daily obligations and sort of family or future measures, we are now Muslim.

89

3.8 The reproductive religious believers ratio

1. Do you have faith in God?
2. Do you act on the faith that you have in God?
There is a clear difference between belief in God Almighty on its own and the
measurement for this, and a measurement for participation in religious activity
with its corresponding dimension of religious practice or in German, praxis.
The above two questions show how any measurement for determining the
religion of a people as belonging to one religion or another, must go beyond
the simple Which faith do you ascribe to? question.
The reproductive religious believers ratio (RRP ratio) gets into three or four
different things:
1. Biological survival- It tells us about reproduction. It tells us about
fertility. By including those people who have grown up living with both
parents instead of with single parents, it comes to a sensible idea over
which religion is producing and reproducing people who will prolong a
propagated faith. So it tells us about which religion is procreating the
faith as well as propagating the faith.
2. Religiousity- It tells us about a religion and its followers, whether they
themselves consider themselves to be a religion. So, by including those
who say they are religious, it attests to the validity of a religion ie. If
those surveyed agree with the notion of the measurement take or not.
3. Faith in God- It reminds us of what is at heart, whether the sample
population believe in this God or that, or the other. By including those
who say they believe in a God, it looks beyond religion and participation
and moves into the area of faith and its praxis.
4. Daily praxis- This measurement is to include as our definition of Muslims
or Christians, only those who pray in congregation daily. It has not been
calculated.

90

5. Weekly praxis- At the moment the RRP ratio, or simply the ratio includes
only those people in the general population who go to the places of
worship on a weekly basis.

It is therefore interesting to note that whereas in Islamic countries, eg.

Afghanistan, 99 or 100% people are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Muslim
Have both parents bringing them up
Pray daily and weekly
Believe conscientiously
Are religious

In countries like USA which can only be described as half-way house (or even
keel between Muslim and Christian), only half are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Of a certain faith, by admission

Have both parents bringing them up
Pray daily and weekly
Believe conscientiously
Are religious

It is not surprising that one expects Afghanis, Pakistanis, Indians, Bengalis, who
are Muslim to overtake the other religions in the west.

91

Chapter 4 Little Pakistan

4.1 Shocking results from the 2011 Census revealing Islam has conquered UKs capital city,
London.
August 2011 riots If there were riots across England last year why did they start in London,
where 12% are Muslim religious worshippers (of Allah ta Ala)? Because of the selfdestructing warbent economic and foreign policies of the self-imposed government.
History of Islamic Khilafa state The Arab Spring produced Islamic civilisations to revolt to
produce or renew their political situation. Egypts Muslim Brotherhood coming to power in
Egypt was the reinstitution of Islamic Khilafa State and itself created the Ramadhan Riots
which were a condoning of President Mursis Egypt as well as other revolutions.
History of Middle Eastern civilisations From Prophet Yusha (AS) who formed Israel as he
first formed 12 armies for the tribes ( al Asbat) to the acceptance of Palestine at the UN as a
non-observer state, the history of individual civilisations and cultures is rich let alone as an
Ummah, or entirety.
Historical re-emergence of civilisations and cultures- This century is the century in which
history will be written again and China and India will rise in the economic realm.
Fall of the west The rise of either China or India, of course will defeat America and its
plans for hegemony. Although it will be 100 years of superpower status, a multi-power
world will require a new sack of the new Rome.
London as UK seat of power The UK is ruled by London, but in London the people follow
Islam, so surely UK, Canada, The West Indies, Australia and New Zealand are basically ruled
by Muslims.
Shariah as a new source of law- Shariah zones are creeping into London boroughs,
seeing as Christians have blatantly failed to rule the world, the Muslim Ummah, with
a unique Divine code, the Shariah now do so, the British and so on, being part of
the dominion.

92

2011 Census table of worshippers in London places of worship who are

Muslim or Christian
London

Average

Average

boroughs

weekly

daily

worshippers

worshippers

in Muslim

in Muslim

places of

places of

worship

worship

Pop.

Camden
City of London

Muslim

220,338

Christians

26,643

M%

74,821

C%

12.1%

34.0%

9.1%

6.0%

7,375

409

3,344

5.5%

45.3%

4.2%

2.8%

Hackney

246,270

34,727

95,131

14.1%

38.6%

10.6%

7.1%

Hammersmith and Fulham

182,493

18,242

98,808

10.0%

54.1%

7.5%

5.0%

Haringey

254,926

36,130

114,659

14.2%

45.0%

10.6%

7.1%

Islington

206,125

19,521

82,879

9.5%

40.2%

7.1%

4.7%

Kensington and Chelsea

158,649

15,812

86,005

10.0%

54.2%

7.5%

5.0%

Lambeth

303,086

21,500

160,944

7.1%

53.1%

5.3%

3.5%

Lewisham

275,885

17,759

145,588

6.4%

52.8%

4.8%

3.2%

Newham

307,984

98,456

123,119

32.0%

40.0%

24.0%

16.0%

Southwark

288,283

24,551

151,462

8.5%

52.5%

6.4%

4.3%

Tower Hamlets

254,096

87,696

68,808

34.5%

27.1%

25.9%

17.3%

Wandsworth

306,995

24,746

162,590

8.1%

53.0%

6.0%

4.0%

Westminster

219,396

40,073

97,877

18.3%

44.6%

13.7%

9.1%

Barking and Dagenham

185,911

25,520

104,101

13.7%

56.0%

10.3%

6.9%

Barnet

356,386

36,744

146,866

10.3%

41.2%

7.7%

5.2%

Bexley

231,997

5,645

144,093

2.4%

62.1%

1.8%

1.2%

Brent

311,215

58,036

129,080

18.6%

41.5%

14.0%

9.3%

Bromley

309,392

7,841

187,656

2.5%

60.7%

1.9%

1.3%

Croydon

363,378

29,513

205,022

8.1%

56.4%

6.1%

4.1%

Ealing

338,449

53,198

148,055

15.7%

43.7%

11.8%

7.9%

Enfield

312,466

52,141

167,417

16.7%

53.6%

12.5%

8.3%

Greenwich

254,557

17,349

134,632

6.8%

52.9%

5.1%

3.4%

Harrow

239,056

29,881

89,181

12.5%

37.3%

9.4%

6.2%

Havering

237,232

4,829

155,597

2.0%

65.6%

1.5%

1.0%

Hillingdon

273,936

29,065

134,813

10.6%

49.2%

8.0%

5.3%

Hounslow

253,957

35,666

106,660

14.0%

42.0%

10.5%

7.0%

Kingston upon Thames

160,060

9,474

84,684

5.9%

52.9%

4.4%

3.0%

Merton

199,693

16,262

111,993

8.1%

56.1%

6.1%

4.1%

Redbridge

278,970

64,999

102,755

23.3%

36.8%

17.5%

11.6%

93

Richmond upon Thames

186,990

6,128

103,319

3.3%

55.3%

2.5%

1.6%

Sutton

190,146

7,726

111,086

4.1%

58.4%

3.0%

2.0%

Waltham Forest

258,249

56,541

124,939

21.9%

48.4%

16.4%

10.9%

8,173,941

1,012,823

3,957,984

11.8%

48.6%

8.9%

5.9%

London

94

4.2 Conclusion
On the presence of Islam in the British Islands. A relative not absolute
majority
There is no alternative to recognition of the British Islands as part of the
Muslim empire. To do this we must reactivate an Islamic Political Party in
Britain, and begin our entrance into the political process. As the system of
tyranny founded terrorism as its politics, we must then launch a law suit
against the queen and the present British government based in London,
through the ICC in Malaysia.
Unfortunately, the philosophy of subversion and deviation, the path we have
been forced into practicing and will only continue to do so, tells us to hate our
religion and to be submissive to other religions. This is complete balderdash
and must be discontinued immediately.
The following survey would give a clear answer, to how many of the London
boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them:

London
borough

Newham
Redbridge
Hillingdon

Admitted Admitted
Daily
Believes Termed
Weekly
Christianity in God themselves attendees practitioners
Islam
religious

95