of
the
book
G.
Buonomo,
Lo scudo di cartone
(The
shield
of
cardboard),
Rubbettino
ed.,
2015,
p.
254.
The
alternative
-
between
fraud
and
abuse
of
the
parliamentary
privilege
-
is
perceived,
in
Italy,
with
a
greater
pathos
of
many
other
modern
democracies.
It
can
be
explained
by
the
exasperation
of
the
parliamentary
Republic,
only
recently
corrected
by
a
electoral
system;
it
can
be
explained
by
the
lack
of
public
spirit
of
many
holders
of
public
functions,
ready
to
bend
them
for
private
or
not
legitimate
aims.
It
can
be
explained
by
the
change
in
the
traditional
border
between
politics
and
justice,
since
the
authorization
to
proceed
was
abolished
in
1993,
but
in
the
meanwhile
it
has
been
introduced
an
authorization
on
wiretaps
difficult
to
manage.
The
explanation,
which
favors
the
author
of
this
book,
is
instead
that
it
is
a
byproduct
of
the
dogma
of
the
sovereignty
of
Parliament.
In
the
British
parliamentarianism
that
was
the
role
of
judicial
review,
exercised
in
the
Palace
of
Westminster;
in
the
Italian
peninsula
it
has
been
evolving
differently,
and
do
not
yet
know
how
to
get
out.
The
book
explains
paths
through
which
Italy
came
to
this
slow
evolution,
and
what
are
the
tools
to
move
forward
according
to
the
principles
of
rule
of
law.
The
result
will
be
not
only
more
clarity
in
the
use
of
the
parliamentary
privilege;
but
it
will
also
avoid
that
-
on
important
matters
of
the
institutional
life
(such
as
the
regulation
of
lobbyists,
conflict
of
interest,
the
contributions
to
the
groups,
equal
access
to
the
media
during
the
election
campaign,
the
requirements
for
appointments
to
the
independent
Authorities)
-
the
lack
of
protection
leads
the
injured
parties
to
report
to
international
bodies
lack
of
access
to
a
judge
in
the
Italian
legal
system.