Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Reg. No.
Under the guidance of
Prof.
CERTIFICATE
Place: Bengaluru
Date:
CERTIFICATE
Date:
Prof. Sriram M.
DECLARATION
Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am indebted to many people who helped me accomplish this
research project successfully. First, I thank the Vice Chancellor
Rev Fr Con Dr. Thomas C Matthew of Christ University for giving
me the opportunity to do my project. I thank Prof. Suresh Pai,
Associate dean, Dr. Jain Mathew, Head of department, Department
of Management Studies for their kind support. I thank Prof. Sriram
M. for his constant support and guidance during the course of my
project. I thank my parents for their blessings and support, without
which this project would not have seen the light of day.
Jahnvi Gupta
Table of Content
S.No
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.5
Title
Executive Summary
CHAPTER 1
Introduction to Marketing
Competitive Advantage
Social Cause
Cause Related Marketing
Review of Literature
CHAPTER 2
Industry Profile
Proctor and Gamble Co.
Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
ITC Ltd.
Tata Tea Ltd.
CHAPTER 3
Page No.
1
3
7
8
8
13
19
20
21
22
3.1
24
3.2
Research Design
24
3.3
Participants
25
3.4
Data Collection
25
3.5
Software used
26
3.6
26
CHAPTER 4
4
4.1
Descriptive Analysis
27
4.2
Inferential Analysis
69
CHAPTER 5
5.1
Findings
70
5.2
Recommendation
71
5.3
Conclusion
72
References
Annexure
List Of Tables
Table No.
4.1.1.1
4.1.2.1
4.1.3.1
4.1.4.1
Name
Company associate its brand with CRM
Corporate should promote its brand with CRM
CRM related Marketing Promotions
Simple to identify the company with its cause
Page no.
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
39
40
41
34
35
36
37
38
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
List Of Figures
Table
Table Name
No.
no.
4.1.1.1
4.1.2.1
4.1.3.1
4.1.4.1
4.1.5.1
4.1.6.1
4.1.7.1
4.1.7.2
4.1.7.3
4.1.7.4
4.1.8.1
4.1.9.1
4.1.10.1
4.1.11.1
4.1.12.1
4.1.13.1
4.1.13.2
4.1.13.3
4.1.13.4
4.1.13.5
4.1.14.1
4.1.15.1
4.1.15.2
4.1.15.3
Page
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
49
50
51
52
4.1.15.4
4.1.15.5
4.1.16.1
4.1.17.1
4.1.17.2
4.1.17.3
4.1.17.4
4.1.17.5
4.1.18.1
4.1.19.1
4.1.19.2
4.1.19.3
4.1.19.4
4.1.19.5
53
54
56
57
58
59
60
61
63
64
65
66
67
68
Executive Summary
To study the increased competitive advantage of companies by the use of
Social Cause Related Marketing.
The main purpose of this study is to know the concept of Cause Related
Marketing that is nowadays widely and extensively used by many big
organizations to build a competitive advantage and to create brand equity.
CRM is about forging long-term relationships between businesses & nonprofit organizations to market an image, product, service or cause for mutual
benefit. It provides the emotional as well as the rational engagement of the
consumer with the brand. Cause Related Marketing helps an organization to
cater more customers by acting socially responsible towards the society. In the
research it has been explained the concept of Cause Related Marketing by
taking four famous examples i.e. Tata Tea Jaago re and P&G Shiksha
Campaigns, ITC Ltd, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. According to the secondary
data, it is generally been noticed that a customer picks a product, which is into
promoting social campaigns as those products have a good image in the minds
of the customers. Even rural audiences have the tendency to purchase such
products because they can relate that campaigns to their well-being, growth
and development. Such social campaigns had faced a huge success in todays
scenario because people thinks that it is important for a company to be
consumer oriented but it is very important for a company to show concern
towards the society and should contribute something good for the well being
of the society. To check the impact of such social campaigns in the mind of
the customers and to know how such campaign influence people to buy a
product or how it effects their purchase decision, a small survey was
conducted with a sample size of 220 and result concluded out of it. The data
shows that it is very important factor of purchase decision for the customers
but there are other factors too, still Cause Related Campaigns influence
customers to buy a product. Further in this report the responses are collected
by showing the print advertisements of four known Cause Related Marketing
Campaigns and data is collected which tells that people recall such
advertisements quickly and has a good perception about the company.
However, some people have doubt in their minds that whether the companies
are actually pay this amount to non-profit organizations or not.
Chapter I
Introduction
more than fulfill the clients answer all their inquiries and request a referral it
is that basic.
Each little business manager's objective is to benefit and grow, and without
marketing, this is not going to happen.
Functions of Marketing
It alludes to those practice exercises that you as a marketer must perform with
a specific end goal to accomplish your set marketing destinations.
Research function:
The Research function of marketing is that function of marketing that
empowers you to create sufficient data in regards to your specific
market of target. You must do sufficient exploration to recognize the
size, conduct, society, accept, gender orientations and so on of your
target market fragment, their needs and need, and after that create
viable item that can meet and fulfill these market needs and need.
Purchase function
The Purchase is performed so as to procure quality materials for
creation. When you plan a decent item idea, you ought to additionally
guarantee you're purchasing the crucial materials for the item. This
capacity is done by the buy and supply office, however your details of
materials goes far in supporting the obtaining division to get the vital
materials required for creation.
Production function:
Production
is
the
function
performs
by
the
production
department.
Promotion function:
Promotion is one of the core functions of marketing since your finish
product must not remain in the place of production, hence, you as a
marketer must design effective communication strategies to informing
the availability of your product to your target market.
Pricing function:
The function of pricing on the product offerings by designing effective
pricing systems, base on the product stage and performance in the
product life cycle. Price is the actual value consumers perceive on your
product, so you as a marketer should ensure that your value of your
product is not too high or too low to that of your costumers.
Distribution function:
The function of distribution is to ensure that your product is easily and
effectively moved from the point of production to the target market,
the kind of transportation system to employ e.g. Road, rail, water or
air, and ensures that the product can be easily accessed by customers.
You as a Marketer should also design the kind of middlemen to engage
in the channel of distribution, their incentives and motivations etc.
Financing function:
Financing deals with the part of marketing to providing incomes for
your business. It refers to how you can raise capital to start operation
and remain in business. It refers to your modes of payment for the
goods and services transferred to your costumers.
Features of Marketing
The marketing Management alludes to planning, organizing, directing, control
of the initiates that encourage the trading of products and administrations
between the makers to end consumers. Firms today need to invest cash to
make time, spot and proprietorship utilities .The principle features of modern
day marketing are as per the following:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
efforts of both profit as well as nonprofit organization for mutual benefit. This
type of term is sometimes used broadly as well as generally refers to any type
of marketing effort for social and other causes. It provides the emotional as
well as the rational engagement of the consumer with the brand. Cause related marketing is different from corporate giving as the corporate giving
generally involves some specific donation that is tax deductible, while cause
related marketing is a marketing which is based on marketing relation and not
necessarily based on a donation.
This concept came into existence in the early 1980s when a company named
American Express joined with a nonprofit group that helps it to raising the
funds to restore the Statue of Liberty. American Express gave a portion of
every purchase through their credit card to the endeavor and an additional
amount for every new application that resulted in a new credit card customer.
The company also launched a $4 million advertising campaign to generate the
awareness of the concept among the people and within three-month of that
Campaign American Express, 27% increases in their card users and the
Restoration Fund raised over $1.7 million. New card applications increased
45% over the previous year.
Everyone
involved
was
a
winner,
the
nonprofit
cause
received
needed
funds;
American
Express
increased
sales
of
its
product
and
achieved
a
reputation
for
social
responsibility.
American
Express
even
trademarked
the
term
cause-
related
marketing.
Now,
more
than
ever,
the
companies
are
realizing
the
potential
of
aligning
themselves
with
a
cause.
Earlier
it
was
used
mostly
to
increase
sales
and
profits,
but
now
it
is
used
as
a
great
brand
positioning
contrivance
as
it
works
on
vitalizing
brand
equity
and
enhancing
corporate
image
with
sound
economic
and
community
impacts.
In todays world CRM has different types of versions but in generally its is a
agreement which is done between business and non-profit to raise fund for a
particular cause. CRM program is not an unknown or low-key donation to a
nonprofit.
Product sales. Think of the Red campaign that has brought together many
companies to sell specially branded products (a red Gap T-shirt or a red
iPod for instance) with a portion of the selling price going to the Global
Fund for HIV/AIDS prevention.
Licensing of the nonprofit's logo, brand, and assets. Licensing runs the
gamut from products that are extensions of the nonprofit's mission to using
its logo on promotional items such as T-shirts, mugs, and credit cards to
having the nonprofit provide a certification or commendation of particular
products. An example of the latter is the American Heart Association,
which provides recognition for products that meet their standards for heart
health.
with the 3M Company to build and outfit a science gallery for children. The
involvement of the corporation in this program is deeper than the usual
"sponsorship" with scientists from the company involved in helping with
the exhibits to the company's employees serving as volunteers.
use
of
marketing
principles
and
techniques
to
It boosts sales.
The ability to sway selective consumers who want to support the cause
Grau S.L. & Folse J.A.G., (2011) through their research found that the CRM
campaigns are generally positive for companies as well as for causes. For
companies, CRM has been noted to increase sales and enhance companies
image. As for causes, they received greater funding and publicity. Causeproximity, which is one of the important elements of CRMs structure, has
been suggested to significantly influence consumers response towards CRM.
However the impacts of cause-proximity on consumers response are
inconsistent. In this light, this paper investigates two main things that is: The
effect of cause-proximity on consumers response to CRM and second is the
moderating role f gender on the relationship between cause-proximity and
consumers response to CRM. The results indicate that the effect of causeproximity is insignificant while gender does influence consumers response to
CRM. Based on these results, implications for CRM campaign managers and
research limitations are highlighted.
Shah, (2013) did a study and find out CRM is a form of marketing that uses
various strategies, tools and traditional advertising methods to change
attitudes, perceptions and behaviors as they relate to social issues. Non-profit
organizations and companies form alliances to market images, services and
products. People have a more favorable view of a company that contributes or
sponsors a cause that they think is worthy. For instance, people are more likely
to be interested in a company that is contributing to this research. CRM is an
existing concept where both business and charity or any good causes can
benefit. It also attracts new sources of funds, resources and support. It is an
innovative and potentially powerful tool to improve the lives and well-being
of individuals, create environments that support social objectives, re-orient
social services to be customer-driven, develop social capital, lead to improved
public policies, and ultimately, achieve social goals. This research paper
focuses the practices of cause related marketing of some of the selected firms
and how it affects the consumer in our country as a new policy.
In a study done by Rajput, Tyagi, & Bhakar, (2013) the researchers tried to
show the impact of Social Cause Related Marketing on customer brand
preferences. As we all know, Social Cause Related Marketing has emerged as
a top management priority in the last decade due to the growing realization
that it one of the most valuable intangible tool that firms have to gain better
corporate image from Internal as well as External Customers. Findings from
the study showed that the impact of Social Cause Related Marketing on
Customer Brand Preference has a significant relationship between the two.
And the respondents gave high importance to Self -Image in case of CRM and
Brand Awareness in Brand Preferences.
In a study done by ori, ivadinovi, & Dropulji, (2011) through their
research on effects of cause and donation size of cause related marketing
program on consumers intention to buy cause-related marketing by analyzing
to what extent consumers intention to buy a certain brand during a CRM
campaign has been influenced by their relation to the cause and donation size
from that campaign has been influenced by their relation to the cause and
donation size from that campaign. The results of the research, i.e. that personal
relation to a cause of the campaign and donation size from a single sale
positively influence consumers purchasing intention to buy a brand that is a
subject of CRM campaign. These results correspond to the results of previous
research.
The research done by Garg, (2007) on Social cause related marketing and its
impact on customer Brand preferences the objectives of the study were to
understand the impact of cause related marketing on corporate brand image
and on sales and customers brand loyalty. The author adopts a descriptive
research design that helps to portray the characteristics of a group or
individual as a situation. It includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of
various kinds. Sample size for the study was taken as 200 respondents of
which 100 samples were of the customers and the rest were of the retailers in
Ambala and Yamuna Nagar cities of Haryana. The major findings of the
study were that, the different factors influencing the customers were - Brand
Name, availability, advertisement, price, quality and cause related marketing
concept. Suggesting that, the companies must generate more awareness
regarding its contribution to social causes through TV & Internet advertising
as it is directly related to increase in sales and brand loyalty.
Alcheva, Cai, & Zhao, (2009) conducted a study on This research paper talks
about the connection between the cause-related marketing and buying
behaviour and attitude by exploring consumers perception of CRM strategy,
their attitudes toward the CRM strategies and behavior. The research being
limited to sample of students who took part in the questionnaire. The survey
was designed as a questionnaire with fourteen close-ended questions. The
questionnaire started with the description Case of McDonalds Children
Charity, and the definition of CRM, so that, respondents could better
understand the CRM and to obtain real perception and attitude toward the
CRM, as well as their buying behavior. The findings being that consumers are
more likely to support companies that are engaged in cause campaigns and
tend to develop positive attitude toward this company and its products.
Kim, Kim, & Han, (2005) conducted a research in which; Participants were
presented with six different cause-related marketing contexts, corporate
credibility and product-cause relatedness. The authors try to understand why
cause-related marketing work for some firms more than others? Explaining the
success of a vast number of companies in the various industries sponsoring
causes related to environmentalism, but at the same time, evidently linked to
issues such as deforestation? (Such as pulp industry) The empirical model in
the paper examines how product-cause relatedness and corporate credibility
affect attitudes toward a company and the brand attempting to further break
down the construct of product-cause relatedness according to relevance of a
products risk. Based on the findings, the conclusions are drawn- Firstly;
cause-related marketing has a different effect on attitude toward the brand and
attitude toward the company. In spite of similar patterns in the responses,
attitudes toward the company are far more influenced by the level of corporate
credibility than attitudes toward the brand. On the other hand, consumers
attitude toward the company compared to that of the brand is less affected by
product cause relatedness. It was suggested that product-cause relatedness
directly affects attitude toward the product brand, whereas corporate
credibility directly influence corporate attitude. Shown that the two types of
attitude are highly correlated, these effects are likely to weaken as they are
passed on to company attitude and brand attitude. Attitude toward the brand is
more favorable for firms with a high credibility than for those with low
credibility. When firms support a cause consumers perceive as being related to
the products direct risk (e.g., obesity caused from eating hamburgers), not
only can attitude toward the brand become less favorable compared to when a
non-risk related cause or an unrelated cause is supported, but positive effect of
cause- related marketing actually backfires.
Hunjra, Azam, & Humayoun, (2012) made a study on Cause related marketing
and its impact on sales: mediating by brand loyalty and customer purchase
intention. In this study CRM and sales are tested so as to strike in any relation
and examine the impact of CRM campaigns on brand loyalty, consumer
purchase intention and ultimately on sales. The research design involved
distributing questionnaires among students and employees at different
universities and organizations. A total of 629 people filled questionnaires. A
five point Likert scale was used to assess the respondents' level of agreement
or disagreement. This study reviews the affects of CRM on sales specifically
in FMCG sector of Pakistani market, also some factors like brand loyalty and
consumer purchase intention participate in it and enhance the results. After an
intense literature review in this study, five hypothesis were developed CRM
campaigns have positive impact on consumer purchase intention, CRM
campaigns have positive impact on brand loyalty, Consumer purchase
intention has positive impact on sales, Brand loyalty has positive impact on
sales, CRM has positive impact on sales. This study concludes that cause
related marketing campaigns have positive influence on sales activities of
companies. This link is also mediated by brand loyalty and consumer purchase
intention that eventually has positive effect on sales. It is witnessed through
this study; it helps to increase customer base strategies. It also helps in
capturing more market share along with it increased brand loyalty index,
which pursue customers to make repetitive and bulk purchases.
In the study titled, Does cause congruence affect how different corporate
associations influence consumer responses to cause-related marketing? By
Chen, Su, & He, (2013), it is examined how diverse corporate affiliations may
Chapter II
Industry Profile
segment.
Today, Proctor & Gamble is the second largest FMCG Company in India after
Hindustan Unilever Limited.
Procter & Gamble (P&G) Cause-Related Marketing initiative
P&G includes conservational sustainability and social conscience to define
sustainability.
P&G Is measured to be the worlds best cause marketer. P&G has been
constantly taking up several CRM initiatives in every country they operate in.
If we talk about Shiksha it is an important part of P&G's philanthropy program
- Live, Learn & Thrive - focused on the development of children in need
across the globe. It is an exceptional method that permits customers in India to
lead social change in the area of education for underprivileged children.
Whenever, a consumer buys a large pack of Ariel, Tide, Vicks, Whisper,
Pantene, Gillette Mach 3, Head & Shoulders, Duracell, Oral B or Pampers
during the months of April - July, P&G donates a part of the profits to its
NGO partners who then organize the funds through various projects across the
country. Irrespective of sales, P&G will commit a minimum of Rs.1crore
towards the donation funds of Shiksha every year. With a motto of Padhega
India, Badhega India - Shiksha believes that the secret to a brighter India lies
in the quality education of our children.
Shiksha has been successful in impacting 150,000 children so far, in
association with leading NGOs - Round Table India (RTI), Child Rights &
You (CRY), NGO Round Table India is spearheading the identification,
establishment, completion and maintenance of RTI Shiksha School projects in
the country as a joint partner bringing onboard expertise in building schools as
well as contribution towards funds.
Strategy used by P&G
o
Partner with a leading media channel by leveraging the cause and also
offering exclusive content
deprived section of the society. These initiatives may give some positive
responses to the brand for a short term.
In India , HUL supports a long term cause-branding initiative for its
Lifebuoy brand ( Lifebuoy SwasthyaChetana) with the objective of spreading
the awareness of importance of washing the hands with soap in rural India.
2.3 ITC Limited
ITC Limited or ITC is an Indian conglomerate headquartered in Kolkata, West
Bengal. Its diversified business includes five segments: Fast Moving
Consumer Goods (FMCG), Hotels, Paperboards, Paper & Packaging and Agri
Business. A line of premium range of notebooks under brand Paperkraft was
launched in 2002. To reach a wider student population, a range of notebooks
was launched under brand Classmate in 2003. Classmate over the years has
grown to become Indias largest notebook brand. In Years 2007 - 2009 they
launched Children Books, Slam Books, Geometry Boxes, Pens and Pencils
under the Classmate brand. In 2008, ITC repositioned the business as the
Education and Stationery Products Business and launched India's first
environment friendly premium business paper under the Paperkraft brand.
Paperkraft offers a diverse portfolio in the premium executive stationery and
office consumables segment. ITC introduced Essenza Di Wills, a range of
fragrances and bath & body care products for men and women in July 2005.
The company launched 'Fiama Di Wills' range of Shampoos, Shower Gels and
Soaps in 2007. The Company also launched the 'Superia' range of Soaps and
Shampoos in the mass-market segment in 2007 and Vivel De Wills & Vivel
range of soaps and shampoos in 2008.
ITC ltd. Cause-Related marketing initiative:
ITC has launched their Classmate notebooks with the initiative of donating 1
rupee towards the education of underprivileged students.
ITC Classmate, has also launched a program called Classmate Ideas for India
challenge. This program would be a part of the company's centenary
initiative. The nation-wide program would invite ideas of the youth, who have
the potential to transform India. Classmate Ideas for India challenge plans to
reach out to 25 lakh students across 30 cities, 500 schools and 200 colleges
across the country.
2.4 Tata Tea Ltd.
Tata Tea was set up in 1964 through a joint venture with UK-based James
Finlay and the Tata Group for manufacturing tea and coffee. Currently Tata
Tea and the UK-based Tetley group have the worlds second largest branded
tea operations with a presence in 40 countries. The company has portfolio of
five brands in the domestic market namely Tata Tea, Tetley, Kanan Devan,
Chakra Gold and Gemini. Tata Tea has evolved from being a brand that
promised freshness of the tea gardens, to a brand that awakens every Indian.
We have come to stand for a way of life to our consumers.
The brand enjoys almost 'legendary' status in India as a trusted 'Super brand'
that not only enjoys market leadership in branded packet tea, but has also
transformed the way beverages are marketed through its 'Jaago Re' campaigns.
Tata Tea has promoted social awakening and action encouraging young
people to vote, inviting consumers to pledge against bribery and
through www.jaagore.com bringing citizen volunteers together with 70+
NGOs to give their time for a range of good causes.
The brand has also initiated the Tata Tea Jaago Re Inter Milan Soccer Stars
program. This is a unique soccer tournament that promotes soccer among
school children and helps talented young soccer players in India to access the
best in terms of infrastructure, training and above all an International platform
to exhibit India's future talent.
TATA Tea ltd. Cause-Related marketing initiative:
The company seems to have got the faultless blend of ad campaign and social
awareness programs. When it launched the Jaago Re campaign in 2007, it had
no idea what it stumbled on to. Jaago Re meaning Wake Up was a brand
campaign to bring all the Tata brands of tea.. The marriage between Jaago Re,
a social awakening, and Tata Tea created a case study for any cause marketing
campaign not only because of the scale of the idea but also for its reach.
Mr. Sanjiv Sarin, regional president, South Asia, Tata Global Beverages, says,
"While tea may wake you up, Tata Tea awakens you. The campaign
demonstrated Tata Tea's thought leadership in positioning tea as a medium of
'social awakening' and not just 'physical awakening'.
While the theme matched the anxiety of youngsters, it also helped Tata Tea
reach scale. By propagating their theme during the 2009 elections, the
campaign ensured that it addressed at least 720-780 million people, those
above 18 and eligible to vote.
Company has been able to ride the wave of movements in social activism.
After the buzz of elections died down, and even before anyone could
anticipate the spate of corruption scandals that would unfold in the years to
come, Jaago Re had moved on to the theme of corruption. They decided to
take on a campaign that saw two lakh people pledging never to bribe again.
This is what made Jaago Re a huge success. Tata Tea did not stop there. Since
the online format would help only those with Internet connectivity, it built
teams to go on the ground to help people vote. Talks were organized in over
200 of India's largest colleges and companies to spread the message and to
organize on-the-spot voter registration drives.
The campaign also became agnostic to the medium but loyal to the message.
Tata Tea put its muscle behind every single communication medium: TV,
print, radio, online, and even sent volunteers to places that have no access to
these forms of communication.
Chapter III
Research Methodology
3.3 Participants
A sample size of 220 respondents was taken, with responses from men and
women. Number of male respondents were 131 and female respondents 89.
Company records
Internet
Newspapers
Magazines
Online Journals
Chapter IV
Data Analysis and
Interpretation
Valid
Cumulative Percent
Yes
186
84.5
84.5
84.5
No
34
15.5
15.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.1.1
Fig 4.1.1.1
Inference: 84.55%of people think that it is very important for a company to
associate their brands with Cause Related Marketing.
Q2. Do you think corporate should promote its brand that it is using Cause
Related Marketing?
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Yes
155
70.5
70.5
70.5
No
65
29.5
29.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.2.1
Fig 4.1.2.1
Inference: 70.45% people think that corporate should promote its brand that
they are using CRM activities to promote their brands as well as increase their
goodwill with the help of CRM activities
Strongly Disagree
1.4
1.4
1.4
Disagree
21
9.5
9.5
10.9
Neutral
75
34.1
34.1
45.0
Agree
98
44.5
44.5
89.5
Strongly Agree
23
10.5
10.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.3.1
Fig 4.1.3.1
Inference: 44.55% people agree that they have often see CRM related
marketing promotions and 9.55% people disagree that they had not seen CRM
marketing promotions not often.
Valid
Yes
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
192
87.3
87.3
87.3
No
28
12.7
12.7
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.4.1
100.0
Fig 4.1.4.1
Inference: 70.45% people think that corporate should promote its brand that
they are using CRM activities to promote their brands as well as increase their
goodwill with the help of CRM activities.
Q5. Are you ready to pay a bit higher price for the company's product, which
is related to a social cause?
.
Valid Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Yes
143
65.0
65.0
65.0
No
77
35.0
35.0
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.5.1
Fig 4.1.5.1
Inference: 65% of people say that they are ready to pay a bit higher price for
the companys products which are related to a social cause.
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Yes
160
72.7
72.7
72.7
No
60
27.3
27.3
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Valid
Table 4.1.6.1
Fig 4.1.6.1
Inference: 72.73% people say that the companies are doing these types of
activities to overcome competition.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
4.1
4.1
4.1
Disagree
24
10.9
10.9
15.0
Neutral
47
21.4
21.4
36.4
Agree
110
50.0
50.0
86.4
Strongly Agree
30
13.6
13.6
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.7.1
Fig 4.1.7.1
Inference: 50% of people agree that the companies do CRM activities give a
favorable impression to the society.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
4.1
4.1
4.1
Disagree
.9
.9
5.0
Neutral
48
21.8
21.8
26.8
Agree
113
51.4
51.4
78.2
Strongly Agree
48
21.8
21.8
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.7.2
Fig 4.1.7.2
Inference: 51.63% think that in todays Scenario it is important for a
company to be socially responsible.
Cumulative Percent
Strongly Disagree
12
5.5
5.5
5.5
Disagree
19
8.6
8.6
14.1
Neutral
82
37.3
37.3
51.4
Agree
80
36.4
36.4
87.7
Strongly Agree
27
12.3
12.3
100.0
Total
220
100.0
Table 4.1.7.3
100.0
Fig 4.1.7.3
Inference: 36.4% people agree that CRM have appositive impact on the
society that helps the company to do lots of CRM activities for the growth of
the company.
Strongly Disagree
21
9.5
9.5
9.5
Disagree
.9
.9
10.5
Neutral
58
26.4
26.4
36.8
Agree
77
35.0
35.0
71.8
Strongly Agree
62
28.2
28.2
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.7.4
Fig 4.1.7.4
Inference: 35% of respondents agree that the some corporate in India think
that the corporate who doing CRM activities are sometimes misused it only
for profit.
Descriptive Statistics
N
Std.
Deviation
220
3.58
.992
220
3.86
.908
220
3.41
.996
220
3.73
1.162
220
Table 4.1.7.5
Q8. Will you stop using the products of the company if they stop contributing
to a social cause?
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Yes
85
38.6
38.6
38.6
No
135
61.4
61.4
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.8.1
Fig 4.1.8.1
Inference: 61.36% people say that they will not stop using the products of the
company if they stop contributing to a social cause.
126
25%
TV
160
31%
Billboards
23
5%
Internet
116
23%
Campaigns
81
16%
Other
1%
Table 4.1.9.1
Sales
Newspaper
TV
Billboards
Internet
Campaigns
Other
Fig 4.1.9.1
Inference: 31% of people think that TV is the best source to promote Cause
Related Marketing.
Q10. If you have to choose between different brands with the same price and
quality, you will choose the brand that you know supports a social cause.
.
Valid
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Strongly Disagree
10
4.5
4.5
4.5
Disagree
18
8.2
8.2
12.7
Neutral
49
22.3
22.3
35.0
Agree
106
48.2
48.2
83.2
Strongly Agree
37
16.8
16.8
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.10.1
Fig 4.1.10.1
Inference: 48.18% respondents agree that between different brands with the
same price and quality, they will choose the brand that they know supports a
social cause.
Q11. Do you agree most statements made by the companies in advertising or
product labels about supporting a social cause are true and they are actually
spending that amount on some noble social cause?
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.3
2.3
2.3
Disagree
32
14.5
14.5
16.8
Neutral
85
38.6
38.6
55.5
Agree
81
36.8
36.8
92.3
Strongly Agree
17
7.7
7.7
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.11.1
Fig 4.1.11.1
Inference: 36.82% respondents agree that the most statements made by the
companies in advertising or product labels about supporting a social cause are
true and they are actually spending that amount on some noble social cause.
Q12. Try to identify this advertisement and answer the below questions
accordingly:
I remember this Ad campaign
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
.9
.9
.9
Disagree
16
7.3
7.3
8.2
Neutral
54
24.5
24.5
32.7
Agree
109
49.5
49.5
82.3
Strongly Agree
39
17.7
17.7
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.12.1
Fig 4.1.12.1
Inference: 49.55% respondents remember this Ad campaign. This seems that
the corporate is making a good effort in CRM activities.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.7
2.7
2.7
Disagree
21
9.5
9.5
12.3
Neutral
49
22.3
22.3
34.5
Agree
119
54.1
54.1
88.6
Strongly Agree
25
11.4
11.4
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.13.1
Fig 4.1.13.1
Inference: 54.09% respondents agree that the message given by this campaign
is understandable to them.
Valid
Strongly Disagree
2.7
2.7
2.7
Disagree
19
8.6
8.6
11.4
Neutral
66
30.0
30.0
41.4
Agree
110
50.0
50.0
91.4
Strongly Agree
19
8.6
8.6
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.13.2
Fig 4.1.13.2
Inference: 50% of respondents agree that the message they want to give
through this ad campaign of CRM is authentic.
Strongly Disagree
2.3
2.3
2.3
Disagree
16
7.3
7.3
9.5
Neutral
75
34.1
34.1
43.6
Agree
103
46.8
46.8
90.5
Strongly Agree
21
9.5
9.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Fig 4.1.13.3
Fig 4.1.13.3
Inference: 46.82% of respondents agree that the benefits described in
the Ad are believable to me.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1.8
1.8
1.8
Disagree
23
10.5
10.5
12.3
Neutral
98
44.5
44.5
56.8
Agree
80
36.4
36.4
93.2
Strongly Agree
15
6.8
6.8
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Fig 4.1.13.4
Fig 4.1.13.4
Inference: 36.36% respondents think after viewing this ad they are ready to
buy this product as it is doing a CRM campaign.
E) This Ad is much better than other Ads for products in this product
category.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1.8
1.8
1.8
Disagree
25
11.4
11.4
13.2
Neutral
85
38.6
38.6
51.8
Agree
86
39.1
39.1
90.9
Strongly Agree
20
9.1
9.1
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Fig 4.1.13.5
Fig 4.1.13.5
Inference: 39.09% respondents say that CRM campaign ad of this product is
much better than the other ads for products in this same product category.
Std.
Deviation
3.62
.906
3.53
.873
3.54
.851
3.36
.829
3.42
.875
220
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.3
2.3
2.3
Disagree
2.7
2.7
5.0
Neutral
34
15.5
15.5
20.5
Agree
129
58.6
58.6
79.1
Strongly Agree
46
20.9
20.9
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.14.1
Fig 4.1.14.1
Inference: 58.64% respondents agree that they remember this ad campaign
completely
Q15.Based on the above advertisement, answer the following.
Please mark on your opinion
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1.8
1.8
1.8
Disagree
10
4.5
4.5
6.4
Neutral
41
18.6
18.6
25.0
Agree
122
55.5
55.5
80.5
Strongly Agree
43
19.5
19.5
100.0
220
100.0
Table 4.1.15.1
100.0
Total
Fig 4.1.15.1
Inference: 55.45% respondents agree that the message is understandable to
them and they can easily get to know what the corporate is trying to say.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1.8
1.8
1.8
Disagree
3.2
3.2
5.0
Neutral
57
25.9
25.9
30.9
Agree
117
53.2
53.2
84.1
Strongly Agree
35
15.9
15.9
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.15.2
Fig 4.1.15.2
Inference: 53.18% respondents agree that the message in the ad Authentic to
the customers.
Cumulative
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.3
2.3
2.3
Disagree
2.7
2.7
5.0
Neutral
58
26.4
26.4
31.4
Agree
114
51.8
51.8
83.2
Strongly Agree
37
16.8
16.8
100.0
220
100.0
Table 4.1.15.3
100.0
Total
Fig 4.1.15.3
Inference: 51.82% respondents agree that the benefits described in the ad are
believable to them and they can easily trust on this ad.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
1.8
1.8
1.8
Disagree
3.6
3.6
5.5
Neutral
67
30.5
30.5
35.9
Agree
104
47.3
47.3
83.2
Strongly Agree
37
16.8
16.8
100.0
220
100.0
Table 4.1.15.4
100.0
Total
Table 4.1.15.4
Inference: 47.27% respondents agree that the after viewing this ad, they
would consider purchasing this product.
E) This Ad is much better than other Ads for products in this product category.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.7
2.7
2.7
Agree
10
4.5
4.5
7.3
Neutral
71
32.3
32.3
39.5
Agree
95
43.2
43.2
82.7
Strongly Agree
38
17.3
17.3
100.0
220
100.0
Table 4.1.15.5
100.0
Total
Table 4.1.15.5
Inference: 43.18% think that this ad is much better than other ads for products
in product category.
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean
Std.
Deviation
3.86
.844
3.78
.815
3.78
.837
3.74
.846
3.68
.907
220
Table 4.1.15.6
Q16. Try to identify this advertisement and answer the below questions
accordingly:
I remember this Ad campaign
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.3
2.3
2.3
Disagree
.9
.9
3.2
Neutral
24
10.9
10.9
14.1
Agree
123
55.9
55.9
70.0
Strongly Agree
66
30.0
30.0
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.16.1
Fig 4.1.16.1
Inference: 55.91%agree that they remember this ad campaign completely.
Q17.Based on the above advertisement, answer the following.
Please mark on your opinion
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
2.7
2.7
2.7
Disagree
2.7
2.7
5.5
Neutral
32
14.5
14.5
20.0
Agree
120
54.5
54.5
74.5
Strongly Agree
56
25.5
25.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.17.1
Fig 4.1.17.1
Inference: 54.55% respondents agree that the message in this ad is
understandable to them.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
3.6
3.6
3.6
Disagree
1.4
1.4
5.0
Neutral
46
20.9
20.9
25.9
Agree
119
54.1
54.1
80.0
Strongly Agree
44
20.0
20.0
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.17.2
Fig 4.1.17.2
Inference: 54.09% respondents agree that the message in this ad is
authentic.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
3.2
3.2
3.2
Disagree
1.8
1.8
5.0
Neutral
49
22.3
22.3
27.3
Agree
113
51.4
51.4
78.6
Strongly Agree
47
21.4
21.4
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.17.3
Fig 4.1.17.3
Inference: 51.36% respondents agree that the benefits described in the ad are
believable to them.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
.5
.5
.5
Disagree
11
5.0
5.0
5.5
Neutral
61
27.7
27.7
33.2
Agree
97
44.1
44.1
77.3
Strongly Agree
50
22.7
22.7
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.17.4
Fig 4.1.17.4
Inference: 44.09% of respondents agree that after viewing this a, they would
consider purchasing the product.
E) This Ad is much better than other Ads for products in this product
category.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
.5
.5
.5
Disagree
3.6
3.6
4.1
Neutral
67
30.5
30.5
34.5
Agree
101
45.9
45.9
80.5
Strongly Agree
43
19.5
19.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.17.5
Fig 4.1.17.5
Inference: 45.91% think that this ad is much better than other ads for products
in product category.
Descriptive Statistics
Std.
Deviation
3.97
.870
3.85
.879
3.86
.883
3.84
.850
3.80
.807
220
Table 4.1.17.6
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
48
21.8
21.8
21.8
Disagree
52
23.6
23.6
45.5
Neutral
58
26.4
26.4
71.8
Agree
46
20.9
20.9
92.7
Strongly Agree
16
7.3
7.3
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.18.1
Fig 4.1.18.1
Inference: Only 20.91% respondents say that they remember this ad
completely.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
43
19.5
19.5
19.5
Disagree
65
29.5
29.5
49.1
Neutral
58
26.4
26.4
75.5
Agree
39
17.7
17.7
93.2
Strongly Agree
15
6.8
6.8
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.19.1
Fig 4.1.19.1
Inference: 29.55% of respondents disagree that they did not understand the
message what the company is trying to say.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
42
19.1
19.1
19.1
Disagree
61
27.7
27.7
46.8
Neutral
69
31.4
31.4
78.2
Agree
36
16.4
16.4
94.5
Strongly Agree
12
5.5
5.5
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.19.2
Fig 4.1.19.2
Inference: 31.36% 0f respondents say that they have neutral reaction towards
the authentication of this ad.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
39
17.7
17.7
17.7
Disagree
60
27.3
27.3
45.0
Neutral
79
35.9
35.9
80.9
Agree
31
14.1
14.1
95.0
Strongly Agree
11
5.0
5.0
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.19.3
Fig 4.1.19.3
Inference: 35.91% of respondents had neutral response about the benefits
described in this ad is believable to them
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
25
11.4
11.4
11.4
Disagree
47
21.4
21.4
32.7
Neutral
96
43.6
43.6
76.4
Agree
44
20.0
20.0
96.4
Strongly Agree
3.6
3.6
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.19.4
Fig 4.1.19.4
Inference: 43.64% respondents has neutral response about after viewing this
ad, they would consider to purchase this product or not.
E) This Ad is much better than other Ads for products in this product category.
Valid
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Strongly Disagree
38
17.3
17.3
17.3
Disagree
50
22.7
22.7
40.0
Neutral
92
41.8
41.8
81.8
Agree
26
11.8
11.8
93.6
Strongly Agree
14
6.4
6.4
100.0
Total
220
100.0
100.0
Table 4.1.19.5
Fig 4.1.19.5
Inference: 41.82% of respondents have neutral response about this ad
is much better than other Ads for products in this product category
Independent t tests 1
F
Are you
ready to pay a
bit higher
price for the
company's
product,
which is
related to a
social cause?
Equal
variances
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
1.155
Sig.
.284 .529
df
218
.597
.035
.066
-.095
.164
.035
.065
-.094
.163
Table 4.2.1.1
Interpretation: Therefore, we reject H1 in favor of H0. We accept the null
hypothesis i.e. there is no significance between the difference in the opinion
that the respondents are ready to pay a bit higher price to the CRM companies
with respect to gender. In other words, females do mind paying a higher price
for CRM activities in comparison to men.
Chapter V
Findings and Suggestions
5.1 Findings:
70.45% people think that corporate should promote its brand that they
are using CRM activities to promote their brands as well as increase
their goodwill with the help of CRM activities
44.55% people agree that they have often seen Cause Related
Marketing promotions and 9.55% people disagree that they have not
seen CRM promotions often.
65% of people say that they are ready to pay a bit higher price for the
companys products that are related to a social cause.
72.73% people say that the companies are doing these types of
activities to overcome competition.
50% of people agree that the companies that do CRM activities have a
favorable impression in the society.
36.4% people agree that CRM has a positive impact on the society,
which helps the company to do lots of CRM activities for the growth
of the company.
35% of respondents agree that the some corporates in India think that
the corporates that are doing CRM activities are sometimes misused it
only for profit.
61.36% people say that they will not stop using the products of the
company if they stop contributing to a social cause.
48.18% respondents agree that between different brands with the same
price and quality, they will choose the brand that they know supports a
social cause.
cause are true and they are actually spending that amount on some
noble social cause.
5.2 Recommendations:
A company can easily increase their revenue and sales with such social
cause promotions as people would not mind paying a rupee extra for a
product, which is contributing, to a social cause and rather people have
a tendency to buy a product which is associated with social cause
campaign.
Company built an image in the minds of the present consumer and has
acquired customers on the basis of Cause-Related Marketing campaigns
and in order to attract new segment they need to continue with such
campaigns.
Company should give their message very clearly so that people can
easily understand what they are trying to say as many companies came
up with the Cause Related Marketing campaign but failed as they dont
give that message clearly.
5.3 Conclusion
Most people say that they are even ready to pay a higher price for such
product that does social cause campaign and they will not switch over
to another brands if they know that the brand they use is actually
contributing to a society.
There are a large number of people who say that they will not stop
using the product if the company stops contributing to a social cause
because now a company has already built an image in the mind of the
consumers and those consumers are now their loyal customers.
If people are getting same quality and price, they usually choose a
product that does Cause Related marketing campaigns because that
company has a better image and reputation among people.
Very significant population think that the best way to promote Cause
Related Marketing is television and after this newspaper
Bibliography
Bibliography
Shah,
M.
G.
(2013).
Cause-Related
Marketing
Practice
of
Some
Selected
Firms
In
Bangladesh
And
Its
Effect
On
Target
Segment.
INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL
OF
SCIENTIFIC
&
TECHNOLOGY
RESEARCH
,
2
(1),
123-127.
Garg,
B.
(2007).
Social
cause
related
marketing
and
its
impact
on
customer
Brand
preferences.
International
Marketing
Conference
on
Marketing
&
Society
,
219-222.
Shabbir,
S.,
&
Kaufmann,
H.
R.
(2010).
Cause
related
marketing
campaigns
and
consumer
purchase
intentions:
The
mediating
role
of
brand
awareness
and
corporate
image.
African
Journal
of
Business
Management
,
1229-1235.
Burton,
S.,
&
Kees,
J.
(2010).
The
Moderating
influence
of
consumers
temporal
orientation
on
the
forming
of
Societal
needs
And
corporate
responses
in
cause-related
marketing
campaigns.
Journal
of
Advertising
,
39,
35-50.
Hunjra,
A.
I.,
Azam,
R.
I.,
&
Humayoun,
A.
A.
(2012).
CAUSE
RELATED
MARKETING
AND
ITS
IMPACT
ON
SALES:
MEDIATING
BY
BRAND
LOYALTY
AND
CUSTOMER
PURCHASE
INTENTION.
Munich:
ACTUAL
PROBLEMS
OF
ECONOMIICS.
ori,
D.
S.,
ivadinovi,
N.
K.,
&
Dropulji,
M.
(2011).
The
effects
of
cause
and
donation
size
of
cause-related
marketing
program
on
consumers'
intention
to
buy.
Econ
Papers
,
11-08.
Kim,
H.
J.,
Kim,
J.-I.,
&
Han,
W.
H.
(2005).
The
Effects
of
Cause-Related
Marketing
on
Company
and
Brand
Attitudes.
Seoul
Journal
of
Business
,
11,
83-117.
Anuar,
M.
M.,
&
Mohamad,
O.
(2011).
Examining
the
Effects
of
Cause-
Proximity
and
Gender
on
Consumers
Response
to
Cause-Related
Marketing:
Evidence
from
Malaysia.
International
Journal
of
Marketing
Studies
,
3,
174-
181.
Chen,
R.,
Su,
S.,
&
He,
F.
(2013).
Does
cause
congruence
affect
how
different
corporate
associations
influence
consumer
responses
to
cause-
related
marketing?
Australian
Journal
of
Management
,
39,
191-206.
Rajput,
S.,
Tyagi,
N.,
&
Bhakar,
S.
(2013).
SOCIAL
CAUSE
RELATED
MARKETING
AND
ITS
IMPACT
ON
CUSTOMER
BRAND
PREFERENCES.
Prestige
International
Journal
of
Management
&
IT-
Sanchayan
,
2,
2278
8441.
Alcheva,
V.,
Cai,
Y.,
&
Zhao,
L.
(2009).
How
does
a
cause-related
marketing
strategy
shape
consumer
perception,
attitude
and
behaviour?
20-21.
Till,
B.
D.,
&
Nowak,
L.
I.
(2000).
Toward
effective
use
of
cause-related
marketing
alliances.
Journal
of
Product
&
Brand
Management
,
9,
472
-
484.
Gupta,
S.,
&
Pirsch,
J.
(2006).
The
company-cause-customer
fit
decision
in
cause-related
marketing.
Journal
of
Consumer
Marketing,
,
23,
314
-
326.
Irwin,
R.
L.,
Lachowetz,
T.,
Cornwell,
T.
B.,
&
Clark,
J.
S.
(2003).
Cause-
related
sport
sponsorship:
an
assessment
of
spectator
beliefs,
attitudes,
and
behavioral
intentions.
Sport
Marketing
Quarterly
,
131-139.
Pracejus,
J.
W.,
&
Olsen,
G.
(2004).
The
role
of
brand/cause
fit
in
the
effectiveness
of
cause-related
marketing
campaigns.
Journal
of
Business
Research
,
57,
635640.
Shell,
A.
(1989).
Cause-Related
Marketing:
Big
Risks,
Big
Potential
.
Public
Relations
Journal
.
Moosmayer,
D.
C.,
&
Fuljahn,
A.
(2010).
Consumer
perceptions
of
cause
related
marketing
campaigns.
Journal
of
Consumer
Marketing
,
543
-
549.
Annexures
Questionnaire
Q1. Do you think Corporate should associate its brand with Cause Related
Marketing?
Yes
No
Q2. Do you think corporate should promote its brand that it is using Cause
Related Marketing?
Yes
No
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q4) Is it simple to identify the company with its cause on which it is
promoting?
Yes
No
Q5. Are you ready to pay a bit higher price for the company's product which is
related to a social cause?
Yes
No
Yes
No
Somewhat
Agree
Neither
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Companies that do
CRM activities
have a favorable
impression in the
society.
In todays
Scenario it is
important for a
company to be
socially
responsible.
CRM has a
positive impact on
countrys
development
growth
CRM is
sometimes
misused for profits
Q8. Will you stop using the products of the company if they stop contributing
to a social cause?
Yes
No
d) Internet
e) Campaigns
f) Others _______________
Q10. If you have to choose between different brands with the same price and
quality, you will choose the brand that you know supports a social cause.
Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (1-Strongly Disagree,2-Disagree,3Neutral,4-Agree,5-Strongly Agree)
1) Strongly Disagree
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q11. Do you agree most statements made by the companies in advertising or
product labels about supporting a social cause are true and they are actually
spending that amount on some noble social cause?
Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (1-Strongly Disagree,2-Disagree,3Neutral,4-Agree,5-Strongly Agree)
1) Strongly Disagree
2) Disagree
3) Maybe
4) Agree
Strongly Agree
Q12. Try to identify this advertisement and answer the below questions
accordingly:
5)
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q13. Based on the above advertisement, answer the following. Please mark on
your opinion
Strongly
Agree
Somewhat
Neither
Agree
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
The ad message is
understandable.
The message in the
Ad is Authentic.
The benefits
described in the ad
are believable to
me.
After viewing this
ad, I would
consider
purchasing the
product.
This ad is much
better than other
ads for products in
this product
category.
Q14. Try to identify this advertisement and answer the below questions
accordingly:
Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (1-Strongly Disagree,2-Disagree,3Neutral, 4-Agree,5-Strongly Agree)
1) Strongly Disagree
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q15. Based on the above advertisement, answer the following. Please mark on
your opinion
Strongly
Agree
Somewhat
Neither
Agree
Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
The ad message is
understandable.
The message in the
Ad is Authentic.
The benefits
described in the ad
are believable to
me.
After viewing this
ad, I would
consider
purchasing the
product.
This ad is much
better than other
ads for products in
this product
category.
Q16. Try to identify this advertisement and answer the below questions
accordingly:
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q17. Based on the above advertisement, answer the following. Please mark on
your opinion
Strongly Somewhat
Somewhat Strongly
Neither
Agree
Agree
Disagree Disagree
The ad message is
understandable.
The message in the
Ad is Authentic.
The benefits
described in the ad
are believable to me.
After viewing this
ad, I would consider
purchasing the
product.
This ad is much
better than other ads
for products in this
product category.
Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (1-Strongly Disagree,2-Disagree,3Neutral, 4-Agree, 5-Strongly agree)
1) Strongly Disagree
2) Disagree
3) May be
4) Agree
5)
Strongly Agree
Q19. Based on the above advertisement, answer the following. Please mark on
your opinion
Strongly Somewhat
Somewhat Strongly
Neither
Agree
Agree
Disagree Disagree
The ad message is
understandable.
The message in the
Ad is Authentic.
The benefits
described in the ad
are believable to me.
After viewing this
ad, I would consider
purchasing the
product.
This ad is much
better than other ads
for products in this
product category.
Name: ______________________
Gender:
Male
Female
Age Group
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
Occupation
Student
Service
Business
Other ______