Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

3/24/15, 3:12 AM

Published on Process & Faith (http://processandfaith.org)

Home > Writings > Ask Dr. Cobb > Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

Question:
Process theology has been influential and controversial in Wesleyan-Holiness theology. What
about John Wesleys thought to you find most amenable to process theology?
Publication Month:
August 2014
Author - First Name:
John B.
Author - Last Name:
Cobb, Jr.
I appreciate this question. For a fuller answer, I refer to my book on Wesley, Grace and
Responsibility. I think the reader will see that I find most of Wesleys teaching highly amenable
to process theology. Indeed, I think that historically they belong to the same tradition. Like
Wesley, process theology comes from an Anglican background. Of course, it is mediated
through philosophers, but the two most influential ones, Alfred North Whitehead and Charles
Hartshorne, share that background.
This background is quite different from a Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinist one. Catholicism
promotes philosophical theology but exercises dogmatic control over its philosophers.
Lutherans and Calvinists want theology to be Biblical rather than philosophical. Anglicans are
open to philosophical influence in their thinking without exercising dogmatic control. Explicit
philosophy is not prominent in Wesley, but he was certainly not anti-philosophical. Hence the
prominence of philosophy in the process tradition has not been offensive to Episcopalians and
Wesleyans. Further, its independence from dogma is also acceptable. In this tradition one
expects reason to be supportive of good Christian thinking rather than a threat. This is how
process theologians experience it.
Im sure the reader understands that these are sweeping generalizations not intended to
reject Catholic, Lutheran, or Calvinist contributions. Wesley as a good Anglican deeply
appreciated the Reformers. His Aldersgate experience was a response to a reading from
Luther. He called his views a hairsbreadth removed from Calvinism. Among Protestants of his
day he was remarkably appreciative of Catholics. Like most Anglicans he felt himself in
continuity with the early church fathers a continuity shared by Roman Catholics as well as
the Eastern Church. All of this systems of connection is claimed by process theology as well.
Above all, Wesley was biblical to the core. I know of no more biblical preaching than his. But
precisely because it is authentically biblical, he is not Biblicist. He does not teach sola
http://processandfaith.org/print/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2014-08/wesleyan-theology-and-process-theology

Page 1 of 4

Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

3/24/15, 3:12 AM

scriptura. He appreciates tradition but he does not require acceptance of what are often
regarded as orthodox doctrines developed in that tradition. Process theologians could not ask
for more. We believe that process philosophy opens us to understanding scripture much more
in its own terms than has been true in the past. For a long time the shaping of thought by
Greek philosophies led to filtering biblical thought in a way that distorted it. Even the
Reformers who tried to free themselves from these distortions were not really successful in
doing so because they did not think through to an alternative set of glasses. Even the
translations into European languages suffered as a result. Wesley to a greater extent than
most really allowed the biblical vision to express itself through his preaching. We celebrate
this.
The most serious distortion of the Bible as a whole and the gospel in particular came about
through the translation of Shaddai by almighty. In the Bible Gods power is certainly
emphasized. Often, but certainly not always, this is depicted as controlling power. Jesus
pictured it quite differently. Nowhere does the Bible present God as omnipotent. But in the
early church it was often supposed that glorifying God appropriately led to attributing all power
to deity. This played the positive role of making the subordination of imperial power to divine
power evident, but it has had truly terrible consequences. One of these is the idea of
predestination. The Roman Catholic church wisely, but not very coherently, resisted this.
Calvin unwisely, and not very coherently, reasserted it, wrongly assuming that it was biblical.
Arminius sought to develop a coherent Calvinism that justified the responsibility that Calvin
had located with individuals, but he lost his battle, and the victors affirmed a Calvinism with
which Calvin himself would have been uncomfortable. Wesley identified himself with Arminius.
Neither Arminius nor Wesley explicitly worked out the implications of this view for the nature of
divine power. But Wesley at least avoided the language of omnipotence, recognizing its close
association with the idea of predestination that he so strongly opposed. Process theologians
rejoice that he did so, knowing the harm it causes. Today we can go further, first showing that
it is unbiblical, and then showing that it is irrational, even nonsensical. The Bible makes sense
and is believable. What is called Christian orthodoxy does not and is not. Lets be biblical and
work with the philosophy that helps us be that.
The congeniality with Wesley goes farther still. Some forms of Christianity, especially
Protestant Christianity, make one sharp division among people. They are either saved or they
are not. Some think this is a matter decided by God. Those who share Wesleys view that
human decision is involved often focus on a decisive moment of conversion. Of course they
affirm here, almost uniquely, the working of the Holy Spirit. Wesley, in contrast, sees the Holy
Spirit working in everyone in relation to their own free and responsible decisions throughout
the whole of life. It is at work before conversion (Wesley speaks of justification ); it
continues working in much the same way in sanctifying. The fact that one has experienced
justification does not insure that one will not return to a pre-justified state. The theologian
does not decide such matters by imposed doctrine but by observing what actually happens.
This is all pure process theology.

http://processandfaith.org/print/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2014-08/wesleyan-theology-and-process-theology

Page 2 of 4

Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

3/24/15, 3:12 AM

Today, process theologians would build on Wesleys empiricism. The study of what actually
happens in the lives of people can and should be extended even beyond the bounds of the
Christian community. I believe that Wesley himself would favor this. He responded to
outsiders with remarkable openness and appreciation. The world of outsiders has grown.
Process theologians feel no separation from Wesley in enlarging our study and reflection to
include the spiritual history of humankind.
The specific question has to do with Wesleyan-Holiness theology. This reflects a split among
Wesleys followers. No one questions that for Wesley, at every stage of spiritual growth, the
aim is to become more fully loving of God and neighbor. Perfection in love is the overarching
goal. Still, there has been a tragic split among his followers.
There are passages in Wesley that suggest that perfection in love or entire sanctification is
an achievable goal and even associate its achievement with a particular moment in a persons
life. One could judge that once that goal was reached, there was nothing more to be aimed
for. This second blessing, entire sanctification, can be understood to differ from the first,
therefore, in not being part of an ongoing process but being its completion.
If that was really Wesleys view, then this is a point at which process theology parts company.
We do believe it to be impossible that there are occasions in our lives when Gods aim for us,
the aim of perfect love, is actually attained. That attainment may be repeated in subsequent
moments. But this is not the end of growth. In each moment, what is available to be loved
changes. This provides an endless opportunity for extension. One may confront more and
more challenging enemies, which are harder and harder to love. There is no guarantee that
love will extend to them as well. We do not want to deny the possibility that in every
successive moment perfect love will again prevail. But any belief that one has arrived at final
achievement will make continuing success less likely. It is my opinion that this process
formulation is more Wesleyan than the seemingly static one that too often is presented as
Wesleyan. But of course I do not want to pretend to know what Wesley would say. If Wesley
held to the static view, then process theology disagrees with him.
The mainstream of Wesleyan thought split with those who emphasized holiness in a way that
sounded like the completion of the journey. Sadly, this has led to an overall decline of
emphasis on growth toward perfect love among many Wesleyans today. I indicated that I think
the idea of static fulfillment is not truly Wesleyan. I can say much more emphatically that a
decline of seriousness about reshaping our lives so as to become more truly loving of both
God and fellow humans is a betrayal of the Wesleyan heritage. It is my hope that process
theology can help to renew seriousness about the quest for ever more wholehearted and ever
more expanding love.
Ask Dr. Cobb [1] Empiricism [2] theology [3] Wesley [4] whitehead [5]
Process & Faith is a program of the Center for Process Studies, an affiliated program of the
Claremont School of Theology.
This site and all content 2012 Process & Faith, unless otherwise noted.
http://processandfaith.org/print/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2014-08/wesleyan-theology-and-process-theology

Page 3 of 4

Wesleyan Theology and Process Theology

3/24/15, 3:12 AM

Questions? Comments? Ask the P&F Web Team.

Source URL: http://processandfaith.org/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2014-08/wesleyan-theology-and-process-theology
Links:
[1] http://processandfaith.org/category/kind-content/writings/ask-dr-cobb
[2] http://processandfaith.org/category/keywords/empiricism
[3] http://processandfaith.org/category/keywords/theology
[4] http://processandfaith.org/category/keywords/wesley
[5] http://processandfaith.org/category/keywords/whitehead

http://processandfaith.org/print/writings/ask-dr-cobb/2014-08/wesleyan-theology-and-process-theology

Page 4 of 4