Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
It is not enough to just diagnose the condition but you have to search for the cause. facial nerve
contains three components ( sensory, motor and parasympathetic ) Sensory fibres supply anterior twothird of the tongue, floor of the mouth and palate, and cutaneous sensation from part of the external
ear
LOOK FOR facial asymmetry - Forehead wrinkles, Nasolabial folds ,Watch spontaneous movements
smiling, blinking. CONFIRM> The side of facial weakness by asking patient to raise eyebrows, shut
eyes tight, smile and show teeth and blow up cheeks..
Differential diagnoses :
- BELL'S PALSY(DIAGNOSES OF EXCLUSION)
-Ramsay Hunt syndrome
-Cerebellopontine angle tumor
-Parotid tumor
-Trauma/surgery
-Middle ear disease
-Pontine lesion eg stroke, multiple sclerosis
-mono neuritis multiplex
FROM ETIOLOGICAL POINT OF VIEW
LOOK >
Ear of the affected side for ( Ramsay Hunt syndrome as the cause )
Scar over the parotid gland and palpate for parotid tumor.
Eye movements particularly looking for nystagmus and abducens palsy over the affected side.
Check the corneal reflex and facial sensation.(Loss of corneal reflex is an early sign of
cerebellopontine lesion) Perform Rinne's and Weber's test (Sensory neural deafness in CP angle
tumor). Check Cerebellar signs and pronator drift (pontine lesion).
Tell examiner that you would like to do otoscopy (Middle ear disease) & fundoscopy (MS/DM/SLE)
.Ask examiner you want to check sensation over ant one third of toungue.
Prepare the following questions.
1) What are the common causes of lower motor facial nerv1e palsy?
2) Why there is sapring of upper portion of facial muscles in upper motor lesion of facial nerve?
3) How would manage Bell's palsy?
4) What are three components of facial nerve?.
Dr SHUHAIB.MBBS.MD (Internal Medicine).MRCP (UK).
Like
syndrome. I was asked what the other features of Cushings syndrome were. I was then
asked on how to investigate a patient with Cushings syndrome. I mentioned regarding taking
a history from the patient regarding steroid/traditional use then doing a 24 hour urine for
cortisol then the dexamethasone suppression test. The examiner then asked if the lady had
low dose dexamethosone test which was not suppressed and a high dose dexamethasone
test which was not suppressed ? I asked for the ACTH level and the examiner said that it
was raised. I said that it is most likely from the pituitary gland, probably a pituitary tumour
such as adenoma or craniopharyngioma.
The next was the fundus. I was asked to examine the Right fundus. It was totally normal and
I panic. I was also told off by the examiner that I was touching the eyelids with the
fundoscope and that is why the patient kept on blinking. I apologized and then went on to the
left eye. It was a clear cut battlefield fundus. The diagnosis was central retinal vein
thrombosis. I was asked regarding the causes of CRVO. Then I was asked regarding the
treatment of CRVO.
I score 4/4 for this station.
Next was Station 1 (Respiratory/Abdomen)
I was given a lady who was tachypnoeic and as I examined the lady, I noticed a swelling and
peau d orange appeance over the R breast. As I examined the lungs, I noticed an area of
bronchial breath sound over the R upper zone and thought the trachea was deviated to the
R. There was also signs of R lower zone pleural effusion. I concluded that this patient had R
sided pleural effusion with R UZ collapse consolidation most likely secondary to R ca breast
with mets. Unfortunately the trachea was actually central and there was no collapse
consolidation.
I scored 2/2
In the abdomen station, there was a Malay man with clear cut hepatosplenomegaly. Liver
was 2 finger breaths and spleen 3 finger breaths. They asked me what I found from the
peripheral signs. I only found palmar erythema and said that the most likely diagnosis was
chronic liver disease with portal hypertension. Retrospectively I noticed pigmentation in the
oral cavity but did not mention it because I could not correlate the findings at that time. They
asked me of other differential diagnosis and I gave a list. However coming out from the
examination hall, another candidate from Singapore mentioned that he thought it was
thalassaemia. It never clicked my mind coz I was so focused with the diseases from Ryder
which never mentioned this disease. The case thought me a great deal of lesson.
I scored 2/2
Station 2 (History)
A 25 year old lady who presented with stiffness and jerky movements, uprolling of the
eyeball and drooling of the saliva. Take a history.
It was clear from the stem that the lady had fits. However, after detail history, this was the
2nd episode that she had a fit and previously was on antiepileptic but defaulted due to
development of rash. She was not pregnant and works in a departmental store selling
clothes. She travels by bus.
I was asked regarding the social history where I was told that I had not taken a thorough one.
They wanted to know her hobbies which I missed and asked me how old her parents were.
Of course I did not ask those.
I scored 2/3
Station 3
Neurology
The stem : Examine this gentlemens upper limbs neurologically and locate the site of the
lesion
This gentleman has wasting of the right upper limb and was unable to move the R upper limb
at all. There was also hypotonia with areflexia. Sensory loss pin prick and light touch from C5
to T1. Left upper limb was normal. I finished rather fast and even saw an abrasion wound
over the R scapula region. The told me I still had time and I went on examine the lower limbs
which were perfectly normal. I mentioned that this gentleman has features of lower motor
neuron lesion of the R upper limb with sensory loss from C5 to T1. I mentioned the most
likely cause of trauma. I was asked regarding the investigation which I would have performed
and I answered Nerve conduction study. They then asked me the other differential diagnosis.
I was rather blank but when I wanted to open my mouth, thank god the bell rang. Looking
back, I think the answer would be a cervical rib and also Pancoast tumour.
I scored 4/4
Cardiovascular
I was once told that a scar is a gift ! Well, it could also be the killerI was rather confident in
this station, probably overconfident that I thought to myself after the exam that I certainly had
a 4/4 for this station. I was totally wrong and I would have passed this exam at that time if I
had a 4/4
The stem : This gentleman had palpitation. Please examine his cardiovascular system.
This gentleman had a midline sternotomy scar. The examination was smooth and I could
hear a metallic click of the first heart sound. There was also a flow murmur at the left sternal
edge.
I mentioned that this patient had a mitral valve replacement and in sinus rhythm with no
evidence of infective endocarditis and gave my reasons. However I also mentioned that this
patient had a raised JVP and a parasternal heave, most likely due to pulmonary
hypertension. Later when the feedback came back, I was told that I created the signs for
pulmonary hypertension. I was asked the reason for the palpitation and the investigations.
Lesson to learn do not create signs !
I scored 2/2
Station 4
I gave up this station before the exam, hoping other stations would cover this coz I was not
good at all in communication previously. Moreover, after the mock exam which was held in
Penang GH, I did so badly and thought to myself that it was impossible for me to pass this
station. However, it was actually a very straight forward case.
This middle aged man who had cough for the past 6 months and CXR and CT scan shows a
mass at the left apical region suggestive of a lung malignancy. The task was to break bad
news and to advise regarding further investigations.
I broke the bad news with empathy and he cried for only e few seconds then later just before
it ended, he asked me whether he could go to China. He said that he had booked the flight
earlier on and was very eager to go with his wife. I thought that there was a hidden agenda
here. So I went on a wrong track and asked regarding the China trip. I asked regarding which
part of China and whether it was on a hill and the reason why he was going to China. He
cornered me by asking me whether he could or could not go. I said that it should not be a
problem though I would want to discuss with his wife. I also mentioned regarding the need
for bronchoscopy and staging. The examiner told me that I should not have allowed him to
go to China as he would probably not be fit as would need a bronchoscopy, staging and
further treatment after that. I guess at that time I was thinking that if China meant so much for
him, I didnt want to see him die without able to fulfill his wishes to go to China.
I scored 2/2
So, even though I scored four 4s in the exam, I still failed because I had too many 2s. The
bottom line is that you must get the diagnosis right and not create any signs.
I waited for 6 months before I sat for the next exam. Dr. Ma sat after 3 months and passed
telling me that passing in London was very easyyea right, thats because he passed.
UK experience (The Dark Side)
I would never forget my experience to UK. The journey was long and the price to pay is
enormous. Well I guess for Malaysians to go to UK for an exam is not easy as every pound
is almost RM7. This means that you have to multiply by 7 anything that you buy over there.
Im sure a lot of us do lots of locums with sleepless nights or over nights just to get enough
money to go for the exam. I guess it is the most expensive bet that I have made. So, for
those who are going, my advise is that you should also take it as a holiday(not easy though)
coz if you fail, you still gain something. A lot of people helped me through to UK. A group of
5 of us went to UK, 2 taking the MRCP, 2 taking Diploma of Dermatology which happens to
be the same time and 1(my wife) just went for shopping. I reached London and spent 4 days
there with one day in a Communication lecture course, then traveled to Stoke on Trent
whereby I failed to get an attachement there due to some unforeseen circumstances. I
stayed in the bed and breakfast for a week. Then I traveled to Edinburgh(Livingston)
whereby I was fortunate to have a friend who was in France and allowed me, my wife and 3
other friends to stay in her apartment for 2 weeks. I then traveled to Manchester for a
PACES course for 2 days before returning back to Edinburgh. I then went to Glasgow for 4
days to do an attachement plus enjoying the beautiful scenery. People in the hospital were
nice and friendly. My exam was in Perth, north to Edinburgh.
When I reached Perth by train in the evening, I was already so so tired with traveling. I
stayed in the nurses quarters but found it very uncomfortable and could not sleep the whole
night.
The next morning when I woke up, I was like zombie.
Station 3
I started of with the Neurology station. I was asked to examine the patients lower limbs. He
had stocking distribution of sensory loss with normal motor system examination so I
concluded that he had peripheral neuropathy. I was asked the causes and I mentioned DM,
drugs and they stopped me asking me which type of drugs. I mentioned anti TB and
chemotherapeutic agents. They asked me what was the other big group but I said I was not
very sure at the moment. I was also asked the investigations for which I answered FBS and
NCS. They asked me why I would want to perform an NCS since it was so clearcut. I
mentioned that it could differentiate between axonal and demyelinating and they agreed.
During the last one minute, they asked me to assess the patients speech. I mentioned that
he had dysarthria. They then just said look at the face. At that time the bell rang. My friend in
the next session mentioned that the man had resting tremor. This was obviously not there
when I examined. Probably he just took his Madopar when I examined him in the first
session.
I thought I did badly but actually got 3/4
CVS
This patient has an ejection systolic murmur at the aortic radiating to the neck with a soft
pansystolic murmur at the apex. I concluded in the end that this patient has an aortic
stenosis and gave my reasons. I was asked whether there was any other murmur. I said that
there was a pansystolic murmur in the apex and thought that it was a Gallavardin
phenomenon because the murmur did not radiate to the axilla. I was shot at this point. What
did you just mention ? Enlighten us about what you said. Is it pathological ? The examiners
obviously have not ever heard about Gallavardin phenomenon and thought I had created
something. This time I missed the signs of pulmonary hypertension (In Singapore I created
it). I was asked the investigations and as the bell rang, they asked me to look again at the
JVP and comment. I said it was raised and they were happier.
Station 4
After learning from what I did before the Singapore exam, I was trained by a fantastic
communication expert, Dr. Kok Lai Sun who happened to pass the exam in Singapore, the
same time I sat for that exam. She used to train me almost everyday during lunch time and
this time I felt very confident especially in the part of breaking bad news. This shows that
comm. Skill can be learned and practice, so do not give up this station.
The stem : A middle aged man with valve replacement on T. Warfarin. Came to casualty with
reduced consciousness CT brain shows a massive intracranial bleed. GSC 3/15 , referred
to Neurosurgical not suitable for surgical intervention. Please break the bad news to the
wife who just arrived to the hospital.
I broke the news with a warning shot and found out later that the patient actually defaulted
the INR appointment. I showed empathy. The examiners asked me what else may I have
asked and I said to ask regarding the advance directive. I said I did not ask that because I
felt that the patients wife was not prepared but I did say I would see her again in the
afternoon whereby I planned to ask her that. As I was walking out of the room, the examiners
said Good.I felt I performed well especially for an Asian in comm..
I scored 3/3
Station 5
This station was so bad that I knew I failed as I came out of the station. The first case was a
middle aged lady. The examiner asked me to examine the patients eyes. I was not very
focus at that time and went to examine the visual field. The examiner said skip that. Then I
examined the visual field and he said skip that as well. The as I went to examine the
movements of the eyes, I noticed that she had diplopia on certain gaze and also her eyes
strted to droop so I went on to check for fatiguability without thinking which station I was in.
The examiner got really annoyed and started to show dissatisfaction in my performance. I
knew that I had approached the wrong way. He asked me what I was doing and I said but he
was really unhappy. So he asked me the causes of diplopia and I mentioned and I also said
dysthyroid eye disease but the lady did not have a goiter. He asked me whether goiter was
necessary and I said no. So I went on to examine the thyroid function whereby she was
euthyroid. Probably this lady only had exopthalmos(slight lower sclera seen but I thought
was rather common in the Caucasians) and diplopia.
The next was the skin station where it was an obvious necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum. I
said most likely due to diabetes mellitus. The examiner told me that she was not a diabetic.
He then asked me how many percent of necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum are diabetics. I
made a wild guess of 30%. Later I was asked the differential diagnosis and what I would do. I
mentioned skin biopsy but said that normally it is not done if the diagnosis is clear cut.
Next was a man sitting on a chair and from a far I noticed that the man had arthropathy of
the hands. However I was asked to examine the neck of the patient. This patient had
restriction of movement of the neck and I said the possible cause of atlantoaxial dislocation
with RA in view of the hands. I was then asked to examine the gait and I knew at once that
the patient had features of ankylosing spondylitis. Then I examined the hands and noted
some pitting of the nails with symmetrical deforming arthropathy but no rashes. Tying all that
together, I said that it is psoriatic arthropathy ankylosing spondylitis type. I was immediately
asked to go to the next station. When the answer came back, it was a RA + AS ( I thought
seropositive and seronegative never happens together).
The fundus station was bad too. I was asked to look at the left fundus. The fundus was not
fully dilated and when I looked inside, I noticed a large pigmented scar and nothing else. I
was then asked to look at the other eye. I found dot haemorrhage over the left eye. I
concluded that the patient had a choroidal scar. The examiner was surprised and asked me
about the other eye and I said that there was dot haemorrhages and my differential was a
laser scar. It turned out to be a proliferative DM retinopathy. I felt that I may have missed the
exudated as the eyes were not fully dilated.
I scored 1/1
Station 1
The abdomen was also a nightmare. I was brought to a corner room with a small yellow light
by the side. There was a lady with a branulla and I knew that she was definitely an inpatient.
She was obese and could not fit in the bed. She was also breathless and was lying at 45
degrees. I was asked to examine the ladys abdomen. I tried to lower the bed but the
examiner stopped me and told me to examine the abdomen as it is. This lady had
jaundice(difficult to appreciate as the light was yellow and it was winter) and multiple spider
naevi. I was stopped after examining the liver and was asked to present the findings. I
thought I felt a liver but it was so difficult as the patient was so obese. I then continued and
found ascites. I presented my findings and was asked the cause. I said she had features of
chronic liver disease and also hepatomegaly and ascites. I was asked the causes of
hepatomegaly in chronic liver disease. I was asked the underlying aetiology and I said
alcohol, hepatitis. I also mentioned PBC. They asked me whether the liver was big or small
in PBC. I said it is small (I was obviously wrong).
I scored 1/3
Station 1 (Respiratory)
I was shocked when I reach this station and the examiner asked me to do a running
commentary on what I find on my way. This patient was tachypnoeic and lung findings
suggestive of bilateral lower zone pulmonary fibrosis. I was asked to look at the hands again
of which there was very subtle swelling of the MCP joint. I asked the patient whether there
was any pain and he mentioned not now but last time. I then said that this patient most likely
has rheumatoid lung. They asked me for the causes and I said that I wanted to ask the
patients occupation and also drug history.
I scored 3/3
Station 2 (History)
It was a good start in this station but a very bad ending. The interview went on very
smoothly. It was a 42 years old lady with central chest pain, gripping and she did mention a
few worries. I mentioned that this patient most likely has a cardiac origin chest pain (IHD).
They asked me what was against it (It was not on exertion). I was asked the differential
diagnosis but did not mention anxiety which was the actual diagnosis. I was asked the
investigations and mentioned the investigations for the cardiac. The examiners were not
happy because I could not get the diagnosis of anxiety.
I scored 1/2
As I went out from the hall, I knew I failed. So, I took the train back to Edinburgh and went on
a tour to Edinburgh town. I knew I just wasted about RM20,000 (about 80 nights of locum).
But I guess it was an experience I would never forget. Well, at least I saw snow in
England(Stoke on trent) when I was there. That was the first time I saw real snow. I was
rather depressed when I came back to Malaysia and even applied to change hospital. I am
sure that those who have failed twice before would definitely understand my feeling at that
time. I even thought of quitting becoming a general practitioner. Well, I do have good friends
who tried to console me. I received many sms at that time trying to console me and I do
thank all my colleagues in Penang GH who helped me through this period.
I then had to decide on whether to take the exam again in Singapore next or to wait for
Malaysia. When I reached my house after coming back, I went through the net and applied
for the course in Singapore. I did not get a place as I applied rather late.
My juniors pass the exam and this gives me even more tension and stress. Well, I guess it is
not easy to see your houseman become your specialist.
Malaysia experience (The return of the jedi)
I promised myself not to make the same mistakes I made again. I prepared myself very hard
and more importantly, I prayed very hard too. I had a new sparing partner Dr. Tee CH who
helped me much. Dr. Kok LS continued to give me encouragement and lessons on history
and communication. I travel to Sungai Petani every Saturday to do short cases, whereby I
was taught by Dr. James Smitt who was so nice to take time to train us for short cases every
week without fail. I learned so much especially clinical skills from him and it is rare to find
people like him. Before the exam I went for courses in IMU, Penang Hospital (which was
organized by Dr. Ma) and mock exams (Alor Setar, Penang GH, Sungai Petani). They were
indeed helpful not only to gain confidence but to see such beautiful cases.
This time I brought everything to KL, especially my tie. I went to KL 2 days before to prevent
me getting exhausted the next day from traveling. I booked a 4 star hotel in bukit bintang 2
days before and a 5 star hotel one day before, near the exam centre. I felt so comfortable
and for the first time could have a good night sleep the day before the exam. Well, anyway
our 5 star hotel is much cheaper than a 3 star hotel in Singapore.
This time the first station was the history station which I was not very good in but gave my
very best.
Station 2 History
55 years old lady with fever for 2 weeks and FBC shows Hb 8.2 g/dL, WBC 2.4 Plt 108.
Please take a history from this patient.
The lady told me that her GP said she had jaundice and also had a thyroid surgery done 3
years ago for a thyroid ca.
The diagnosis was a thyroid ca with bone marrow and liver mets.
I was asked the differential diagnosis SLE, chronic infection eg malaria, BM disease, HIV. I
gave my points for and against.
I was asked of other infection that could happen if patient was swimming in a pond I said
Leptospirosis.
I was also asked the investigations that I would do.
Station 3 CNS
I was asked to examine the gait of a patient middle aged. On examination of the gait, there
was broad based and unable to perform tendem walking, falling to the R side. There was
cerebellar signs. I noticed loss of arm swing but there was no tremor and I went on
examining the lower limbs which was normal. I was then asked to present and state the
cause. I said he had cerebellar signs but could not find out the underlying aetiology. I slowly
mentioned the causes. The examiner asked me to examine the tone of the upper limb again
and I still felt it was not increase or cogwheel. I said in fact it was reduced, thinking in mind
the cerebellar signs I got. Just before the bell rang, he asked me to look at the face and I
mentioned masked like most likely Parkinsonism. My other friend in the same exam got the
Parkinson features but missed the cerebellar signs. In fact the man had Parkinson Plus
syndrome (Olivopontocerebellar degeneration).
Station 3 CVS
I moved on without thinking of that station which I did not do that well. As I examined the
patient, I noticed the patient had collapsing pulse and a Corrigans sign. Apex was displaced
and normal S2 with a EDM at LSE and ESM at aortic radiating to the carotids. I diagnosed as
mixed aortic valve disease with predominant AR. I was asked the causes of the mixed aortic
valve and mentioned degenerative, bicuspid valve and collagen vascular disease. I was
asked one single blood test I would perform for this patient and I mentioned VDRL. I was
asked the other investigations of which I mentioned ECG, CXR and Echo stating what I
would like to look for in those investigations.
Station 4 Comm
The stem was this middle aged man with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and atrial
fibrillation on T. warfarin, T. Carvedilol, T. Perindopril, T. Frusemide. Explain the diagnosis to
the patient and also the medications that he is taking. After explaining to the patient the
diagnosis, he asked me the cause and I mentioned that it is not known even after tests such
as Echo, ECG, CXR and so on. I mentioned that this is common and it happens. I explained
regarding the medications and he was worried about the T. warfarin as he said that he is
working in a construction site and risk of trauma. I told him that the risk is even higher if he
does not take the T. Warfarin and told him the complications including a stroke.I advise for
regular INR check. He was also worried about impotence with the beta blocker. I also
mentioned the side effect of chronic cough with the T. Perindopril. It went on quite smoothly
and the examiner asked me whether I thought the patient would comply. I said yes and he
asked me whether I was sure. I said probably I would need to reinforce this and perhaps my
consultant would also help me advise him. I was asked regarding the impotence part but I
mentioned that I did try to ask further on why the patient was worried but he just said nothing.
Station 5 Fundoscopy
I was asked to look at the fundus. There was laser scars in both eyes with lots of hard,soft
exudates and also dot blot haemorrhages. There was also flamed shaped haemorrhages in
the right eye. Both optic disc looks pale but more on the right. I have never seen such
beautiful silver wiring in the left eye before. I told the diagnosis except the optic disc but was
later asked regarding that and gave my diagnosis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with
hypertensive retinopathy. I was asked for differential and I said that the left eye could also be
a central retinal vein thrombosis as a differential.
Hands
I was asked to examine the patients hands. There was bilateral symmetrical deforming
arthropathy over the MCP and PIP joints of both hands. They were rather subtle. There were
no nail changes and rashes. There was positive Tinel on the right and a Rh nodule on the R
elbow. I went on to examine the movements, function and other systems including the lungs
but was stopped. The examiner asked me my diagnosis and I said that it is RA and the
disease is inactive and gave my reasons with carpal tunnel syndrome on the R. I was asked
regarding what other signs and I looked back and noticed I forgot to mention the wasting and
also the swelling over the wrist and mentioned those confidently. I was then asked the signs
of activity and as I was answering, the alarm rang for me to go to the next substation.
I was asked to examine the pateints face. This time I am very focus after my experience
from the UK experience(The Dark side). I screen through first without touching the patient
from a far and noticed he had large hands and feet. I knew that it was a acromegaly and
went on examining the face, tongue, teeth, visual field. Then I went on to the hands and look
for proximal myopathy. When I reached the neck, I noticed a small scar at the throat and
then I wanted to ask the patient to open the shirt but was asked and the examiner told me it
was ok. Then I went on the the feet. I was then asked my findings of which I mentioned it
smoothly. I was asked what else in the neck besides the scar and I mentioned a goiter. I was
then asked about the feet. I mentioned regarding heel pad of the feet and also a large feet,
putting my foot next to the patients. The examiner told me that mine was also big and he
smiled. Then both the examiners laughed.
I was brought to a lady with a rash on the face and was asked to examine the face. I
mentioned that she has a malar rash with some areas of hyperpigmentation but no follicular
plugging. I was asked other presentation and I mentioned. I was also asked what the
commonest mode of presentation neurologically and I said cerebral lupus initially but then
later said I was not sure. I was asked regarding activity and mentioned ESR . I was then
asked also regarding CRP and said yes I would do that too.
Station 1 (Abdomen)
This was a young Malay lady who has a moon face at a glance with a scar at the RIF. I
thought to myself that this must be a renal transplant ! As I went on to examine her, she did
not have any fistula and no evidence of cyclosporine usage. She was pale and there was
hepatosplenomegaly with liver 2FB and spleen 4 FB. I was thinking to myself this must be
ACROMEGALY
LOOK FOR - Scar (trasfrontal),large hands,protrusion of lower jaw,inter dental separation,Visual
field defects,fundosopy (HTN,DM,intracranial tension)
ASK ABOUT- Size of hat,shoes,change in appearance,HTN,DM
COMMENT ON DISEASE ACTIVITY - Sweating,HTN,glycosuria,Headache,skin tags
TESTS - ECG,CXR- Cardiomegaly, Oral GTT- failure of suppression of GH,IGF-1 level,MRI
pituitary fossa,thyroid function,prolactin, testosterone, perimetry
THE GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST IS DIAGNOSTIC - Acromegalics fail to suppress GH below
1mU.IGF-1 is almost always rised in Acromegaly
TREATMENT - Most patient are treated with surgery usually trassphenoidal.Radiation if surgery not
feasible.Somatostatin analogues (octreotide) or Bromocryptin Can be tried.
CAUSE OF DEATH - Cardiac failure,HTN complications,Tumor expansion /hemorrhage
Like
Like
Like
Hiii FRIENDS
THESE ARE THE COMMON CASES CASES FOR PACES YOU MAY COME ACROSS IN
YOUR MRCP PACES . YOU MAY PLEASE ADD CASES THAT YOU REMEMBER as
Comments please .....
LikeLike Share
SPOT DIAGNOSIS.
LikeLike Share
Shuhaib Kunjhibava The diagnosis is central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO). The veins
are tortuous and engorged. Hemorrhages are scattered riotously over the whole retina,
irregular and superficial, like bundles of straw alongside (papilloedema and soft exudates
may also ...See More
1 November 2013 at 01:56 Edited Like 7
LikeLik
THIS Patient has painful, erythematous discrete, nodular lesions in the anterior
aspect of the legs.These lesions are are very typical of erythema nodosum.
Proceed by asking for symptoms and looking for signs of diseases that can cause erythema
nodosum. ..like the following
Have you had a recent sore throat? (post- streptococcal infection).
Are you taking any drugs?
Do you have a cough or are you short of breath? (sarcoidosis).
Do you have chronic diarrhoea? (inflammatory bowel disease).
Causes can be memorized - DIPS OUT
DRUGS ( Penicillin, sulfa drugs)
Infections (streptococcal.)
Pregnancy
SARCOIDOSIS
Oral contraceptive pills)
Ulcerative colitis (Inflammatory)
TUBERCULOSIS).
LikeLike Share
If you suspect liver disease during PACES examination, check for peripheral stigmata of chronic liver
disease which indicate chronic liver disease.
TOP 5 causes of chronic liver disease/cirrhosis in MRCP examination are 1.Alcohol (Always the
number one cause in western countries) 2. Chronic hepatitis (top in the list in Asian countries) From
MRCP, points of view other causes you need to remember- 3. Liver malignancy 4.Cryptogenic
(idiopathic), 5.Budd-chiari syndrome and 6.haemochromatosis.
Look for ant evidence of decomposition. 3A's > 1. Asterixis, 2.Ascites & 3. Altered consciousness
(encephalopathy).
Clues that you look for from MRCP point of view > check
1. Parotid swelling/Dupuytren's contracture (Signs of peripheral neuropathy, proximal myopathy,
beriberi heart (CCF), cerbellar signs > Alcoholic liver disease
2. Tattoo marks, thrombosed veins > hepatitis B or C (paucity of liver cirrhosis signs in hep C)
3. Skin pigmentation / slate grey skin/2nd & 3rd metacarpal arthropathy > Hemochromatosis
4. Xanthelasma with scratch marks /Middle aged ladies > Primary biliary cirrhosis ( Can keep patient
with mild hepatomegaly with sratch marks (cholestasis) & jaundice may not be that evident or with
very minimal icterus)
5. Barrel shaped chest with tachypnea Alpha one antitrypsin deficiency
6. Kayser Fleischer ring, family h/o neuropsychiatric l problem, involuntary movements > Wilsons
disease
7. Elevated JVP > heart failure/TR/constrictive pricarditis
8. Palpate Breast for malignancy ( cause liver secondaries).
9. Evidence of Diabetes > fatty liver
Causes of enlarged liver in chronic liver disease
- Alcoholic liver disease
- Primary biliary cirrhosis
- Malignant transformation.
Like
Typical presentation for a patient with hepatic malignancy>> This patient is cochectic.' There is no evidence
of anemia, icterus, or stigmata of chronic liver disease. There is no lymphodenapothy.The abdomen is not
distended.' and there is no clinical evidence of
ascites
There is hepatomegaly with a non-tender liver edge palpable 4 inch below the costal margin.' There is also a
palpable umbilical nodule.There is no evidence of splenomegaly. There are no audible bruit or a hepatic
venous hum.There are no signs of encephalopathy to suggest hepatic failure'
This patient has hepatomegaly. The presence of cachexia and an umbilical nodule suggests malignancy as
the most likely cause...
Like
Like
Like
YES, Answer is Myesthenia Gravis. Myasthenia gravis is a relatively uncommon disorder. However, it is the
most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission..
NEUROFIROMATOSIS IN PACES
Neurofibromatosis > AD, involves skin, nervous system and skeleton. There are 2 types:
Neurofibromatosis 1 (Von Recklinghausen's disease). Chromosome 17, 1:2500 Cafe au lait
spots/ axillary/ inguinal freckling/Lisch nodules in iris (seen in 90%)/peripheral
neurofibroma/optic gliomas (2%) ,may have low IQ or renal artery stenosis.
Suggest that you would like to order MRI to look for optic glioma /osseous lesions (sphenoid
dysplasia or thinning of long bone cortex with or without Pseudoarthroses).
Neurofibromatosis 2. (Chromosome 22) Features: bilateral acoustic neuromas sensorineural hearing loss is first sign. cafe au lait spots/juvenile posterior sub capsular
lenticular opacity ( a form of cataract).
1)look for fibroma, plexiform neurofibroma, cafe-au-lait spots, axillary freckles, Lisch nodules
in the iris .
2). Ask for family history.
3). Check for 1.Hearing (acoustic neuroma) 2.Visual acuity and fundi (optic glioma) 3.Look
for kyphoscoliosis 4.Check BP for HPT (phaeochromocytoma IS AN ASSOCIATION) .
Common questions examiners would ask you, 1) What is the inheritance pattern of this
disease? 2) What are the possible complications of this illness? 3)How do you manage this
gentleman? 4) What is your advice if this gentleman is going to get married?.
LikeLike Share
LikeLike Share
LikeL
LikeLike Share
Mohammed Elagouri history( details of joint pain ....details of rash....then screening of all possible features
of sle. like lung heart renal nervous and psychiatric manifestions...history of abortion...drug history for drug
induced lupus....history of ttt especially steroids and chloroquine.....and side effects like cushing and
retinopathy....childrens born with heart block....social history completely...concerns......examination ...rash
alopecia..hands...lower limbs.....lung heart auscultations..abdomen HSM...signs of cushing...
23 October 2013 at 14:38 Like 6
Shuhaib Kunjhibava well done Mohammed Elagouri. You covered most of the points in history & focused
examination. The remaining part is explain your diagnosis to the patient & plan of management. Address
patients concern. And get prepared for questions by examiners (2 minutes session).
See specifically for distribution of rash, presence/absence of /any vasculitic rash/Any signs to suggest
patient is on long term steroid therapy/ look for other systems involvement.
Tell examiner you want to check blood pressure/fundoscopy for cytoid body/ urine for proteinuria and ask for
drugs history.
Remember in drug-induced SLE patients, their anti-histon antibody is positive.common drugs causing SLE >
hydralazine, procainamide and isoniazide.