T Mobile Exhibit D

Date: June 04, 2013
S
AW Solutions
300 Crown Oak Centre Drive
Longwood, FL 32750
(407) 260-0231
Danielle Bavcevic
Crown Castle
5350 North 48th Street Suite 305
Chandler, AZ 85226
Subject:
Structural Analysis Report
Carrier Designation:
T-Mobile Co-Locate
Carrier Site Number:
Carrier Site Name:
BA21693B
N/A
Crown Castle Designation:
Crown Castle BU Number:

Crown Castle Site Name:
Crown Castle JDE Job Number:
Crown Castle Work Order Number:
Crown Castle Application Number:
824496
Hercules Tower Farm
235437
615863
189346 Rev. 1
Engineering Firm Designation:
AW Solutions Project Number:
824496
Site Data:
998 Turquoise Dr., Hercules, Contra Costa County, CA

Latitude 37 59' 35.57'', Longitude -122 16' 9.88''
40 Foot - Monopole Tower
Dear Danielle Bavcevic,

AW Solutions is pleased to submit this Structural Analysis Report to determine the structural integrity of the
above mentioned tower. This analysis has been performed in accordance with the Crown Castle Structural
Statement of Work and the terms of Crown Castle Purchase Order Number 550402, in accordance with
application 189346, revision 1.
The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the tower stress level. Based on our analysis we
have determined the tower stress level for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be:
LC5: Existing + Proposed Equipment
Sufficient Capacity
Note: See Table I and Table II for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively.
The analysis has been performed in accordance with the TIA-222-G standard and California Building Code
based upon a wind speed of 85 mph 3-second gust, exposure category C with topographic category 4 and crest
height of 226 feet.
All modifications and equipment proposed in this report shall be installed in accordance with the attached
drawings for the determined available structural capacity to be effective.
We at AW Solutions appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and
Crown Castle. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us
a call.
Structural analysis
an
na
ally
ys
siis pr
p
rep
epa
arre
ed
db
yy:: Q
ian Ma
ia
prepared
by:
Qian
Ma,E.I.
Resp
spectfully submitted
sp
sub
ub
u
bm
miitt
tted
ted
ed by:
by:
Respectfully
Exp. 6/30/13
Emma
manuel Pou
ma
ulliin,
n, P
.E
E.
Emmanuel
Poulin,
P.E.
VP of Engineering
Engi
En
g neering
g
tnxTower
nxTower Report
Rep
po
orrt - version
versio
on 6.0.4.0
6/4/13
40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

Project Number 824496, Application 189346, Revision 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) INTRODUCTION
2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA
Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information
Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information
Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information
3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Table 4 - Documents Provided
3.1) Analysis Method
3.2) Assumptions
4) ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary)
Table 6 Tower Components vs. Capacity
4.1) Recommendations
5) APPENDIX A
tnxTower Output
6) APPENDIX B
Base Level Drawing
7) APPENDIX C
Additional Calculations
tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 2
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 3

1) INTRODUCTION
This tower is a 40 ft Monopole tower designed by ROHN in August of 2009. The tower was originally designed
for a wind speed of 85 mph per TIA-222-G.
2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA
The structural analysis was performed for this tower in accordance with the requirements of TIA-222-G
Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures using a 3-second gust wind
speed of 85 mph with no ice, 30 mph with 0 inch ice thickness and 60 mph under service loads, exposure
category C with topographic category 4 and crest height of 226 feet.
Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information

Center
Number
Mounting
Line
Antenna
of
Level (ft) Elevation
Manufacturer
Antennas
(ft)
40.0
40.0
1
radiowaves
Antenna Model
HP2-18
Number Feed
of Feed
Line
Note
Lines Size (in)
1
13/32
Notes:
1)
Proposed Equipment
Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information

Center
Number
Mounting
Line
Antenna
of
Antenna Model
Manufacturer
Antennas
(ft)
3
andrew
E15S08P80
40.0
40.0
andrew
E15S08P80
6
3
1
ericsson
ericsson
tower mounts
AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe
Platform Mount [LP 303-1]
Number Feed
of Feed
Line
Note
Lines Size (in)
18
3
3
7/8
11/64
7/8
1
2
1
2
1
Notes:
1)
Existing Equipment
2)
Equipment To Be Removed
Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information

Center
Number
Mounting
Line
Antenna
of
Manufacturer
Antennas
(ft)
70
70
9
RFS
60
60
9
RFS
50
50
9
RFS
40
40
9
RFS
30
30
9
RFS
Antenna Model
APX16DV-16DWV-S-E-A20
Number Feed
of Feed
Line
Lines Size (in)
18
18
18
18
18
7/8
7/8
7/8
7/8
7/8
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 4

3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
Table 4 - Documents Provided
Document
Remarks
4-GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS
Brown and Mills Inc
4-TOWER FOUNDATION
Rohn
DRAWINGS/DESIGN/SPECS
4-TOWER MANUFACTURER
Rohn
DRAWINGS
4-TOWER STRUCTURAL
Tower Engineering Professionals,
ANALYSIS REPORTS
Inc.
Reference
Source
3512422
CCISITES
3839311
CCISITES
3512423
CCISITES
3512424
CCISITES
3.1) Analysis Method

tnxTower (version 6.0.4.0), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a
three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases.
Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A.
3.2) Assumptions
1)
2)
Tower and structures were built in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
The tower and structures have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturers
specification.
3)
The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as
specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings.
This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. AW
Solutions should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the tower.
4) ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 5 - Section Capacity (Summary)
Section
Elevation (ft) Component Type
No.
L1
40 - 0
Pole
Size
Critical
Element
P (K)
TP26x18x0.25
-5.68
SF*P_allow
%
(K)
Capacity
1506.86
26.2
Pass / Fail
Pass
Summary
Pole (L1)
26.2
Pass
Rating =
26.2
Pass
Table 6 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity LC5

Notes
Component
Elevation (ft)
% Capacity
Pass / Fail
1
1
1
Anchor Rods
Base Plate
Base Foundation
0
0
0
30.5
24.5
53.2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Structure Rating (max from all components) =
53.2%
Notes:
1)
See additional documentation in Appendix C Additional Calculations for calculations supporting the % capacity
consumed.
4.1) Recommendations
The tower and its foundation have sufficient capacity to carry the existing and proposed loads. No
modifications are required at this time.

APPENDIX A
TNXTOWER OUTPUT
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 5
E15S08P80
Platform
(2)
HP2-18
AIR
5'x2 21
1/2"
Mount
w/Pipe
Mount
[LP
Mount
303-1]
Pipe
40
DESIGNED
APPURTENANCE LOADING
TYPE
40.0 ft
ELEVATION
TYPE
ELEVATION
E15S08P80
40
40
(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe
40
(2) 5'x2 1/2" Pipe Mount
40
E15S08P80
40
40
40
40
E15S08P80
40
HP2-18
40
40
MATERIAL STRENGTH
GRADE
A572-65
Fy
Fu
65 ksi
GRADE
Fy
Fu
80 ksi
TOWER DESIGN NOTES

Tower is located in Contra Costa County, California.
Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard.
Tower designed for a 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard.
Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind.
Tower Structure Class II.
Topographic Category 4 with Crest Height of 226.00 ft
TOWER RATING: 26.2%
2.3
A572-65
26.0000
18.0000
18
0.2500
40.00
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
ALL REACTIONS
ARE FACTORED
AXIAL
6K
SHEAR
7K
MOMENT
206 kip-ft
2.3
TORQUE 1 kip-ft
REACTIONS - 85 mph WIND
Weight (K)
Grade
Bot Dia (in)
Top Dia (in)
Thickness (in)
Number of Sides
Length (ft)
Section
0.0 ft
AW Solutions
300 Crown Oak Centre Drive
Longwood, FL 32750
AW Solutions
Phone: (407) 260-0231

FAX: (407) 260-0231
Job:
BU824496
Project: WO615863
Client:
Code:
Path:
Crown Castle
TIA-222-G
Drawn by:
App'd:
Date:
Scale:
Qian Ma
06/04/13
NTS
E-1
Dwg No.
R:\Central_Data\CROWN CASTLE\CRC - STRUCTURAL\BU824496 - WO615863\ENGINEERING\BU824496 - WO615863.eri
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 6

Tower Input Data

There is a pole section.
This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard.
The following design criteria apply:
2)
Tower is located in Contra Costa County, California.
3)
Basic wind speed of 85 mph.
4)
Structure Class II.
5)
Exposure Category C.
6)
Topographic Category 4.
7)
Crest Height 226.00 ft.
8)
Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.
9)
A non-linear (P-delta) analysis was used.
10)
Pressures are calculated at each section.
11)
Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.
12)
Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feedline supports, and appurtenance mounts are
not considered.
Options
Consider Moments - Legs
Consider Moments - Horizontals
Consider Moments - Diagonals
Use Moment Magnification
Use Code Stress Ratios
Use Code Safety Factors - Guys
Escalate Ice
Always Use Max Kz
Use Special Wind Profile
Include Bolts In Member Capacity
Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section
Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg
Use Diamond Inner Bracing (4 Sided)
Add IBC .6D+W Combination

Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform

Assume Legs Pinned
Assume Rigid Index Plate
Use Clear Spans For Wind Area
Use Clear Spans For KL/r
Retension Guys To Initial Tension
Bypass Mast Stability Checks
Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients
Project Wind Area of Appurt.
Autocalc Torque Arm Areas
SR Members Have Cut Ends
Sort Capacity Reports By Component
Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing
Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder

Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules
Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces
Ignore Redundant Members in FEA
SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression
All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable
Offset Girt At Foundation
Consider Feedline Torque
Include Angle Block Shear Check
Poles
Include Shear-Torsion Interaction
Always Use Sub-Critical Flow
Use Top Mounted Sockets
Tapered Pole Section Geometry

Section
Elevation
L1
ft
40.00-0.00
Section
Length
ft
40.00
Splice
Length
ft
Number
of
Sides
18
Top
Diameter
in
18.0000
Bottom
Diameter
in
26.0000
Wall
Thickness
in
0.2500
Bend
Radius
in
1.0000
Pole Grade
A572-65
(65 ksi)
Tapered Pole Properties

Section
L1
Tip Dia.
in
18.2777
26.4011
Area
2
in
14.0846
20.4326
Tower
Elevation
Gusset
Area
(per face)
ft
ft
I
4
in
560.6340
1711.6544
r
in
6.3012
9.1412
C
in
9.1440
13.2080
Gusset
Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor
Thickness
Af
in
I/C
J
3
4
in
in
61.3117 1122.0058
129.5922 3425.5610
Adjust.
Factor
Ar
It/Q
2
in
7.0437
10.2183
w
in
2.7280
4.1360
w/t
10.912
16.544
Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle

Stitch Bolt
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Spacing
Horizontals
Diagonals
in
in
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 7

Tower
Elevation
Gusset
Area
(per face)
ft
L1 40.00-0.00
ft
Gusset
Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor
Thickness
Af
Adjust.
Factor
Ar
Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle

Stitch Bolt
Stitch Bolt
Spacing
Spacing
Diagonals
Horizontals
in
in
1
in
1
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area

Description
LDF5-50A(7/8'')
7810A-RG-8 TYPE(
13/32'')
Face Allow
or Shield
Leg
B
No
B
No
Component
Type
Placement
Total
Number
ft
40.00 - 0.00
40.00 - 0.00
Inside Pole
Inside Pole
18
1
CAAA
Weight
plf
0.33
0.08
ft /ft
0.00
0.00
No Ice
No Ice
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas

Tower
Elevation
ft
40.00-0.00
Tower
Sectio
n
L1
Face
AR
AF
ft
0.000
0.000
0.000
A
B
C
CAAA
In Face
2
ft
0.000
0.000
0.000
ft
0.000
0.000
0.000
CAAA
Out Face
2
ft
0.000
0.000
0.000
Weight
K
0.000
0.241
0.000
Feed Line Center of Pressure

Section
Elevation
CPX
CPZ
L1
ft
40.00-0.00
in
0.0000
in
0.0000
CPZ
Ice
in
0.0000
CPX
Ice
in
0.0000
Shielding Factor Ka
Tower
Section
Feed Line
Record No.
Description
Feed Line
Segment
Elev.
Ka
Ice
Ka
No Ice
Discrete Tower Loads

Description
Face
or
Leg
Offset
Type
*40*
E15S08P80
From Leg
From Leg
E15S08P80
From Leg
Placement
CAAA
Front
ft
ft
ft
No Ice
0.89
0.36
0.010
40.00
No Ice
6.54
5.51
0.110
40.00
No Ice
0.89
0.36
0.010
Offsets:
Horz
Lateral
Vert
ft
ft
ft
Azimuth
Adjustmen
t
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.0000
40.00
0.0000
0.0000
CAAA
Side
2
Weight
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 8

Description
Face
or
Leg
Offset
Type
From Leg
E15S08P80
From Leg
From Leg
****
(2) 5'x2 1/2'' Pipe Mount
C
C
None
From Leg
From Leg
From Leg
Offsets:
Horz
Lateral
Vert
ft
ft
ft
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
Azimuth
Adjustmen
t
Placement
CAAA
Front
ft
ft
ft
CAAA
Side
Weight
0.0000
40.00
No Ice
6.54
5.51
0.110
0.0000
40.00
No Ice
0.89
0.36
0.010
0.0000
40.00
No Ice
6.54
5.51
0.110
0.0000
0.0000
40.00
40.00
No Ice
No Ice
14.66
1.33
14.66
1.33
1.250
0.030
0.0000
40.00
No Ice
1.33
1.33
0.030
0.0000
40.00
No Ice
1.33
1.33
0.030
Dishes
Description
Face
or
Leg
HP2-18
Dish
Type
Offset
Type
Paraboloid w/o From

Radome
Leg
Offsets: Azimuth
Horz Adjustment
Lateral
Vert
ft
4.00
45.0000
0.00
0.00
3 dB
Beam
Width
Elevation
Outside
Diameter
ft
40.00
ft
2.00
Load Combinations
Comb.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Description
Dead Only
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
Aperture
Area
2
No Ice
ft
3.14
Weight
K
0.030
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 9

Comb.
No.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Description
Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
Maximum Member Forces

Sectio
n
No.
L1
Elevation
ft
Component
Type
Condition
40 - 0
Pole
Max Tension
Max. Compression
Max. Mx
Max. My
Max. Vy
Max. Vx
Max. Torque
Gov.
Load
Comb.
1
10
20
14
20
14
20
Axial
K
0.00
-5.68
-5.68
-5.68
-6.58
6.58
Major Axis
Moment
kip-ft
0.00
-172.98
203.71
8.73
203.71
8.73
Minor Axis
Moment
kip-ft
0.00
-96.87
-8.55
-203.54
-8.55
-203.54
-1.07
Maximum Reactions
Location
Condition
Pole
Max. Vert
Max. Hx
Max. Hz
Max. Mx
Max. Mz
Max. Torsion
Min. Vert
Min. Hx
Min. Hz
Min. Mx
Min. Mz
Min. Torsion
Gov.
Load
Comb.
18
21
2
2
8
6
11
8
14
14
20
20
Vertical
K
Horizontal, X
K
Horizontal, Z
K
5.69
4.27
5.69
200.02
199.85
0.76
4.27
5.69
5.69
-203.54
-203.71
-1.07
5.70
6.58
-0.01
-0.01
-6.48
-5.65
-5.61
-6.48
0.22
0.22
6.58
6.58
-3.39
-0.22
6.48
6.48
0.01
3.27
-3.17
0.01
-6.58
-6.58
-0.22
-0.22
Tower Mast Reaction Summary

Load
Combination
Vertical
Shearx
Shearz
Dead Only
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg -
4.74
5.69
0.00
0.01
0.00
-6.48
Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
-0.14
-200.02
4.27
0.01
-6.48
-199.64
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
0.00
-0.36
-0.36
Torque
kip-ft
0.00
0.01
0.01
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 10

Load
Combination
Vertical
Shearx
Shearz
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
- No Ice
Dead+Wind 120 deg Service
Overturning
Moment, Mx
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, Mz
kip-ft
Torque
kip-ft
5.69
3.27
-5.65
-174.78
-101.02
-0.42
4.27
3.27
-5.65
-174.44
-100.85
-0.42
5.69
5.65
-3.27
-101.19
-174.61
-0.76
4.27
5.65
-3.27
-100.98
-174.31
-0.76
5.69
6.48
-0.01
-0.53
-199.85
-0.69
4.27
6.48
-0.01
-0.48
-199.51
-0.69
5.69
5.61
3.17
96.87
-172.98
-0.59
4.27
5.61
3.17
96.75
-172.69
-0.59
5.69
3.08
5.70
176.41
-93.65
0.40
4.27
3.08
5.70
176.16
-93.50
0.40
5.69
-0.22
6.58
203.54
8.73
1.05
4.27
-0.22
6.58
203.24
8.71
1.05
5.69
-3.39
5.70
176.47
106.01
1.05
4.27
-3.39
5.70
176.22
105.83
1.05
5.69
-5.70
3.39
105.84
176.65
0.96
4.27
-5.70
3.39
105.71
176.35
0.96
5.69
-6.58
0.22
8.55
203.71
1.07
4.27
-6.58
0.22
8.58
203.37
1.07
5.69
-5.70
-3.08
-93.83
176.58
0.98
4.27
-5.70
-3.08
-93.63
176.28
0.98
5.69
-3.17
-5.61
-173.15
97.04
0.03
4.27
-3.17
-5.61
-172.82
96.88
0.03
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
0.00
0.91
1.57
1.81
1.56
-1.81
-1.57
-0.91
-0.00
0.88
-55.77
-48.74
-28.26
-0.24
26.87
-0.10
-28.12
-48.60
-55.63
-48.15
0.00
-0.12
-0.21
-0.19
-0.17
4.74
0.86
1.59
49.01
-26.07
0.11
4.74
-0.06
1.83
56.56
2.43
0.29
4.74
-0.94
1.59
49.02
29.51
0.29
4.74
-1.59
0.94
29.36
49.17
0.27
4.74
-1.83
0.06
2.28
56.70
0.30
4.74
-1.59
-0.86
-26.21
49.15
0.27
4.74
-0.88
-1.56
-48.29
27.01
0.01
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 11

Solution Summary
Load
Comb.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
PX
K
0.00
0.01
0.01
3.27
3.27
5.65
5.65
6.48
6.48
5.61
5.61
3.08
3.08
-0.22
-0.22
-3.39
-3.39
-5.70
-5.70
-6.58
-6.58
-5.70
-5.70
-3.17
-3.17
0.00
0.91
1.57
1.81
1.56
0.86
-0.06
-0.94
-1.59
-1.83
-1.59
-0.88
Sum of Applied Forces

PY
K
-4.74
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-5.69
-4.27
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
-4.74
PZ
K
0.00
-6.48
-6.48
-5.65
-5.65
-3.27
-3.27
-0.01
-0.01
3.17
3.17
5.70
5.70
6.58
6.58
5.70
5.70
3.39
3.39
0.22
0.22
-3.08
-3.08
-5.61
-5.61
-1.81
-1.57
-0.91
-0.00
0.88
1.59
1.83
1.59
0.94
0.06
-0.86
-1.56
PX
K
0.00
-0.01
-0.01
-3.27
-3.27
-5.65
-5.65
-6.48
-6.48
-5.61
-5.61
-3.08
-3.08
0.22
0.22
3.39
3.39
5.70
5.70
6.58
6.58
5.70
5.70
3.17
3.17
-0.00
-0.91
-1.57
-1.81
-1.56
-0.86
0.06
0.94
1.59
1.83
1.59
0.88
Sum of Reactions
PY
K
4.74
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
5.69
4.27
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
4.74
Non-Linear Convergence Results

Load
Combination
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Converged?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Number
of Cycles
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Displacement
Tolerance
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
Force
Tolerance
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
PZ
K
0.00
6.48
6.48
5.65
5.65
3.27
3.27
0.01
0.01
-3.17
-3.17
-5.70
-5.70
-6.58
-6.58
-5.70
-5.70
-3.39
-3.39
-0.22
-0.22
3.08
3.08
5.61
5.61
1.81
1.57
0.91
0.00
-0.88
-1.59
-1.83
-1.59
-0.94
-0.06
0.86
1.56
% Error
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 12

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
0.00000001
Pole Design Data

Section
No.
Elevation
Size
ft
L1
40 - 0 (1)
TP26x18x0.25
Lu
ft
ft
40.00
0.00
Kl/r
A
in
0.0
Pu
IPn
K
1506.86
20.432
6
-5.68
Ratio
Pu
IPn
0.004
Pole Bending Design Data

Section
No.
Elevation
L1
40 - 0 (1)
Size
Mux
IMnx
kip-ft
TP26x18x0.25
205.93
kip-ft
796.43
ft
Ratio
Mux
IMnx
0.259
Muy
IMny
kip-ft
kip-ft
796.43
0.00
Ratio
Muy
IMny
0.000
Pole Shear Design Data

Section
No.
Elevation
L1
40 - 0 (1)
Size
Actual
Vu
K
TP26x18x0.25
6.64
ft
IVn
K
753.43
Ratio
Vu
IVn
0.009
ITn
Actual
Tu
kip-ft
Ratio
Tu
ITn
0.001
kip-ft
1594.80
0.96
Pole Interaction Design Data

Section
No.
Elevation
L1
40 - 0 (1)
ft
Ratio
Pu
IPn
0.004
Ratio
Mux
IMnx
0.259
Ratio
Muy
IMny
0.000
Ratio
Vu
IVn
0.009
Ratio
Tu
ITn
0.001
Comb.
Stress
Ratio
Allow.
Stress
Ratio
0.262
1.000
Criteria
4.8.2
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 13

Section Capacity Table

Section
No.
L1
Elevation
ft
Component
Type
Size
Critical
Element
P
K
Pallow
K
40 - 0
Pole
TP26x18x0.25
-5.68
1506.86
%
Capacity
Pass
Fail
26.2
Summary
Pole (L1)
26.2
RATING =
26.2
Pass
Pass
Pass

APPENDIX B
BASE LEVEL DRAWING
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 14

APPENDIX C
ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS
June 04, 2013

CCI BU No 824496
Page 15
Topographic Factors for use in tnxTower (v. 2.0)

per SEAW RSM-03 Figure 3-3
BU#: 824496
Site Name: Hercules Tower Farm
App#:
Topographic Feature
Exposure Category
Exposure B
Continuous Ridge
Exposure C
Exposure D
Flat Topped Ridge
Tower Type
Hill
Monopole
Flat Topped Hill
Guyed
Self Support (Truss Leg)
Continuous Escarpment
Self Support (Non-Truss Leg)
Featureisisolated
Towerbaseislocatedontheupperhalfofthefeature
Topographic Input
588
362
226
475
575
567
107
Crest Point Elevation (ft. AMSL)

Base Point Elevation (ft. AMSL)
Crest Height (H)(ft.)
Mid-Height Elevation (ft.)
Crest to Mid-Height Distance (L/2) (ft.)
Tower Point Elevation (ft. AMSL)
Structure Upwind Distance (x)(ft.)
KZT(RSM03)
tnxTower Input
Topographic Category:
Crest Height (ft.):
tnxTowerRow
SectionHeightAboveBase(ft.)
Number
1
4
226
AdjustmentFactor
WindPressure
FaceAr
Multiplier
40
0.794
1.000
AtBase:
2.258
2.111
Stiffened or Unstiffened, Ungrouted, Circular Base Plate - Any Rod Material

TIA Rev G
Assumption: Clear space between bottom of leveling nut and top of concrete not exceeding (1)*(Rod Diameter)
Site Data
BU#: 824496
Site Name: Hercules Tower Farm
App #:
Pole Manufacturer:
Other
Anchor Rod Data
Qty:
8
Diam:
1.5
in
Rod Material:
Other
Strength (Fu):
125
ksi
Yield (Fy):
105
ksi
Bolt Circle:
30.5
in
Plate Data
35
1.5
50
Single-Rod B-eff:
10.32
Diam:
Thick:
Grade:
in
in
ksi
in
Reactions
Mu:
206
6
7
0.5
Axial, Pu:
Shear, Vu:
Eta Factor,
If No stiffeners, Criteria:
ft-kips
kips
kips
TIA G (Fig. 4-4)
AISC LRFD <-Only Applcable to Unstiffened Cases
Anchor Rod Results

Max Rod (Cu+ Vu/):
Allowable Axial, *Fu*Anet:
Anchor Rod Stress Ratio:
Base Plate Results

Base Plate Stress:
Allowable Plate Stress:
Base Plate Stress Ratio:
Rigid
43.0 Kips
141.0 Kips
30.5% Pass
Flexural Check
11.0 ksi
45.0 ksi
24.5% Pass
AISC LRFD
*Tn
Rigid
AISC LRFD
*Fy
Y.L. Length:
15.00
Stiffener Data (Welding at both sides)

Config:
0
*
Weld Type:
Fillet
Groove Depth:
0.25
<-- Disregard
Groove Angle:
45
<-- Disregard
Fillet H. Weld:
0.25
in
Fillet V. Weld:
0.3125 in
Width:
5
in
Height:
18
in
Thick:
0.75
in
Notch:
0.5
in
Grade:
36
ksi
Weld str.:
70
ksi
Pole Data
26
0.25
65
18
80
Reinf. Fillet Weld
0
Diam:
Thick:
Grade:
# of Sides:
Fu
n/a
Stiffener Results
Horizontal Weld :
Vertical Weld:
n/a
n/a
Plate Flex+Shear, fb/Fb+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a
Plate Tension+Shear, ft/Ft+(fv/Fv)^2: n/a
Plate Comp. (AISC Bracket):
n/a
Pole Results
Pole Punching Shear Check:
n/a
in
in
ksi
"0" IF Round
ksi
"0" if None
* 0 = none, 1 = every bolt, 2 = every 2 bolts, 3 = 2 per bolt

** Note: for complete joint penetration groove welds the groove depth must be exactly 1/2 the stiffener thickness for calculation purposes
CCIplate 1.5 - Circular Base G 1.3, Effective March 19, 2012
Analysis Date: 6/4/2013
D A T A
AW Solutions Inc
Type
Thickness
Depth at Top
Density
CU
KP
PHI
of Layer
(ft)
(ft)
(lbs/ft^3)
(psf)
(deg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
Clay
2.25
0.00
100.0
0.0
2
Clay
13.25
2.25
100.0
500.0
Layer
Soil Properties
Distance Concrete
Steel
of Top of Pier Strength
Yield
above Ground
Strength
(ft)
(ft)
(ksi)
(ksi)
-----------------------------------------------4.50
0.50
4.00
60.00
Diameter
Pier Properties
******* I N P U T
Calculation Method: Full 8CD
Project Title: BU824496

Project Notes: WO615863
CAISSON Version 10.60

11:14:35 AM Tuesday, June 04, 2013
AW Solutions Inc
**************************************************************************************************
*
*
* CAISSON - Pier Foundations Analysis and Design - Copyright Power Line Systems, Inc. 1993-2010 *
*
*
**************************************************************************************************
Page 1/3
Axial
Load
Shear
Load
Additional Safety
Factor Against
Soil Failure
AW Solutions Inc
******* R E S U L T S
(ft-k) (kips)
(kips)
----------------------------------------------- 1.33/2.5=53.2%
206.0
6.0
7.00
2.50
Moment
Design (Factored) Loads at Top of Pier
Page 2/3
AW Solutions Inc
Page 3/3
Distance below
Shear
Moment
Shear
Moment
Top of Pier
(with Safety Factor)
(with Safety Factor)
(without Safety Factor)
(without Safety Factor)
(ft)
(kips)
(ft-k)
(kips)
(ft-k)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------0.00
17.6
566.3
7.1
226.5
1.55
17.6
593.6
7.1
237.5
3.10
11.3
619.9
4.5
247.9
4.65
-16.6
615.8
-6.6
246.3
6.20
-44.5
568.5
-17.8
227.4
7.75
-72.4
478.0
-28.9
191.2
9.30
-100.3
344.2
-40.1
137.7
10.85
-83.7
194.6
-33.5
77.8
12.40
-55.8
86.5
-22.3
34.6
13.95
-27.9
21.6
-11.2
8.6
15.50
0.0
-0.0
0.0
-0.0
Shear and Moments Along Pier
Distance of Top of Layer

Thickness
Density
CU
KP
Force
Arm
to Top of Pier
(ft)
(ft)
(lbs/ft^3)
(psf)
(kips)
(ft)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Clay
0.50
2.25
100.0
0.0
0.00
1.63
Clay
2.75
6.86
100.0
500.0
123.57
6.18
Clay
9.61
5.89
100.0
500.0
-105.93 12.56
Type
Ultimate Resisting Forces Along Pier
Weight
End Bearing
Pressure
(ft)
(kips)
(psf)
--------------------------------15.500
36.978
377.3
Length
Calculated Pier Properties
Moment Capacity of Drilled Concrete Shaft (Caisson) for TIA Rev F or G

Note: Shaft assumed to have ties, not spiral, transverse reinforcing
Site Data
BU#: 824496
Site Name:
App #:
Maximum Shaft Superimposed Forces
TIA Revision:
Loads Already Factored

1.3
<----Disregard
1.3
<----Disregard
For M (WL)
For P (DL)
Pier Properties
Concrete:
Pier Diameter =
4.5
Concrete Area = 2290.2
Reinforcement:
Clear Cover to Tie=
Horiz. Tie Bar Size=
Vert. Cage Diameter =
Vert. Cage Diameter =
Vertical Bar Size =
Bar Diameter =
Bar Area =
Number of Bars =
As Total=
A s/ Aconc, Rho:
3.30
5
3.75
45.02
9
1.13
1
12
12
0.0052
in
Material Properties
Concrete Comp. strength, f'c =
Reinforcement yield strength, Fy =
Reinforcing Modulus of Elasticity, E =
Reinforcement yield strain =
Limiting compressive strain =
psi
ksi
ksi
2008
Select Analysis ACI Code=
Seismic Properties
in
in2
Seismic Design Category =
Seismic Risk =
in2
0.52%
Solve
(Run)
Flexural
C
Moderate
<-- Press Upon Completing All Input
Results:
Governing Orientation Case: 2
EQ
Mu
0.33%
0.52%
4000
60
29000
0.00207
0.003
ACI 318 Code
ft
in
ACI 10.5 , ACI 21.10.4, and IBC 1810.

Min As for Flexural, Tension Controlled, Shafts:
(3)*(Sqrt(f'c)/Fy: 0.0032
200 / Fy: 0.0033
Minimum Rho Check:

Actual Req'd Min. Rho:
Provided Rho:
Shaft Factored Loads

Mu:
247.9 ft-kips
Pu:
6
kips
Load Factor
1.00
1.00
ft
in2
Max. Factored Shaft Mu:

247.9 ft-kips (* Note)
Max. Factored Shaft Pu:
6
kips
Max Axial Force Type: Comp.
(*) Note: Max Shaft Superimposed Moment does not necessarily
equal to the shaft top reaction moment
EQ
Mu
Case 1
Case 2
Dist. From Edge to Neutral Axis:
7.55
in
Extreme Steel Strain, t:
0.0164
t > 0.0050, Tension Controlled
Reduction Factor,:
0.900
OK
Ref. Shaft Max Axial Capacities, Max(Pn or Tn):
Max Pu = (=0.65) Pn.

Pn per ACI 318 (10-2) 4402.29 kips
at Mu=(=0.65)Mn= 1710.28 ft-kips
Max Tu, (=0.9) Tn =
at Mu==(0.90)Mn=
648
0.00
kips
ft-kips
Output Note: Negative Pu=Tension

For Axial Compression, Pn = Pu:
Drilled Shaft Moment Capacity, Mn:
Drilled Shaft Superimposed Mu:
6.00
1224.27
247.90
(Mu/Mn, Drilled Shaft Flexure CSR:
20.2%
Drilled_Shaft_Moment_Capacity, DSMC, Version 1.1 - Effective 04/01/ 2010
kips
ft-kips
ft-kips
Analysis Date: 6/4/2013

T Mobile Exhibit D

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

T Mobile Exhibit D

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Date: June 04, 2013

Structural Analysis Report

Crown Castle Designation:

Crown Castle BU Number:

Engineering Firm Designation:

AW Solutions Project Number:

998 Turquoise Dr., Hercules, Contra Costa County, CA

Dear Danielle Bavcevic,

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

June 04, 2013

June 04, 2013

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information

Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information

AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

Table 3 - Design Antenna and Cable Information

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

June 04, 2013

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

3.1) Analysis Method

Table 6 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity LC5

Structure Rating (max from all components) =

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

June 04, 2013

Platform Mount [LP 303-1]

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

(2) 5'x2 1/2" Pipe Mount

(2) 5'x2 1/2" Pipe Mount

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

(2) 5'x2 1/2" Pipe Mount

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

TOWER DESIGN NOTES

Bot Dia (in)

Top Dia (in)

Phone: (407) 260-0231

June 04, 2013

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

Tower Input Data

Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform

Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder

Tapered Pole Section Geometry

Tapered Pole Properties

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle

June 04, 2013

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle

Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances - Entered As Area

Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas

Feed Line Center of Pressure

Discrete Tower Loads

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

June 04, 2013

40 Ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

(2) AIR 21 w/ Mount Pipe

(2) 5'x2 1/2'' Pipe Mount

(2) 5'x2 1/2'' Pipe Mount

Paraboloid w/o From

tnxTower Report - version 6.0.4.0

June 04, 2013

Ref. Shaft Max Axial Capacities, Max(Pn or Tn):

Max Pu = (=0.65) Pn.