Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CWA of Missouri
314-608-0168
director@missouri.cwfa.org
--OR-Missouri Precinct Project/MOPP
Attn: Judy
via email at: missouriprecinctproject@gmail.com
The Missouri Parents Bill of Rights Amendment will:
Protect a parents ability to direct the education, upbringing, religious instruction, discipline, physical and
mental health care without government interference.
Require government entities to obtain parents explicit permission before gathering or sharing information or
data about their child or the childs family members. This amendment will protect child and parent from being
punished for their rights to protect a childs private information. (This amendment will not protect a childs
information or data as it pertains to a criminal investigation.)
Every parent has the right to decide what educational setting they choose for their child.
In cases of clear, immediate and substantial threat of physical injury, and where a court of law has found by
clear and convincing evidence that a parent has knowingly exposed a child to neglect, abandonment, reckless
endangerment, or physical abuse as defined by state statute it shall not be considered interference with the parental
rights acknowledged in this amendment.
If any parents, whose rights under this section have been adversely affected by any statute regulation,
ordinance, policy or other act of government authority shall be permitted to file a lawsuit challenging the
constitutionality of the statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other act of government authority, seeking damages
against the government entity against the violation of these parental rights.
oOo
them.
It is time to strike back.
Traditionally, parents have had the right to direct the upbringing,
education, and care of their children unless there was proof of abuse
or neglect. Sadly, those days are fading fast.
But ParentalRights.org is working to adopt the Parental Rights
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This simple article will
protect this essential liberty in a way that our courts have no choice
but to understand.
The government would be prohibited from limiting this right without
first demonstrating a governmental interest of the highest order that
cannot be otherwise served. This is a very high legal standard
that would protect any parent not shown to be unfit due to abuse
or neglect.
More importantly, the courts would be mandated to protect this
right in the face of growing bureaucratic and corporate overreach.
But to pass this Amendment, we must work together. We must
become one strong voice for the rights of parents and the freedom of
our families.
To add your voice to ours, please join our online network here.
We will send you an email newsletter update about once a week that
includes an action item you can take to see these rights secured. (You
can unsubscribe any time, and we will not share your information with
anyone.)
Only by standing together can we defend the right of parents
to provide the best possible care for their children. Please sign
up today, then share this message with your friends!
Sincerely,
Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research
Join the
Discussion
oOo
The CRC has some elements that are self-executing, while others would require implementing legislation. Federal courts would have the
power to determine which provisions were self-executing.5.
The courts would have the power to directly enforce the provisions that are self-executing.6.
A committee of 18 experts from other nations, sitting in Geneva, has the authority to issue official interpretations of the treaty which are
entitled to binding weight in American courts and legislatures. This effectively transfers ultimate authority for all policies in this area to this
foreign committee.8.
Congress would have the power to directly legislate on all subjects necessary to comply with the treaty. This would constitute the most
massive shift of power from the states to the federal government in American history.7.
Reservations, declarations, or understandings intended to modify our duty to comply with this treaty will be void if they are determined to be
inconsistent with the object and purpose of the treaty.10.
Ten things you need to know about the substance of the CRC:
Children would have the ability to choose their own religion while parents would only have the authority to give their
children advice about religion.13.
The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every
parent if a government worker disagreed with the parents decision.14.
A childs right to be heard would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which
the child disagreed.15.
According to existing interpretation, it would be illegal for a nation to spend more on national defense than it does on
childrens welfare.16.
Allowing parents to opt their children out of sex education has been held to be out of compliance with the CRC.19.
Christian schools that refuse to teach "alternative worldviews" and teach that Christianity is the only true religion "fly in the
face of article 29" of the treaty.18.
Children would have the right to reproductive health information and services, including abortions, without parental
knowledge or consent.20.
A murderer aged 17 years and 11 months and 29 days at the time of his crime could no longer be sentenced to life in
prison.12.
A DIFFERENCE!!