Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Snchez-Arcilla, Agustn
Gmez, Jess
Van Vledder, Gerbrant Ph.
Index
1.
Introduction
2.
Physics
2.1. Wave energy balance
2.2. Source terms
3.
4.
Analysis
5.
Conclusions
6.
Recommendations
Appendix: El model WAM Cy 4.5
1. Introduction
2. Physics
2.1.
Energy balance
, ,
, ,
,
+
+
= , = + 4 +
2. Physics
2.1.
Energy balace
,
0
,
+
, ,
, ,
+
=
, = + 4 +
( 5 )
2. Physics
Simulation - Observation
Relationship b/w spectral and integral
parameters (by means of spectral moments):
Mean period:
02 =
0
2
Peak period:
1
=
1
2. Physics
2.2.
, =
1 +
Used as a closure
function (unknown
physics)
Tunable parameters
Latitude:
Longitude:
4045N - 4225N
045E - 315E
Orography
Acute spatial gradient:
Autumn
Winter
Marked seasonality:
Winter-Autumn: Tramuntana
(N) and Llevant (E).
Influence of orography:
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Spring
Summer
BS
Discretization of the domain
Two nested meshes (WM BS):
WM
4. Analysis
Simulation period
Generation of two
storms of different
nature
(representativeness).
4. Analysis
Simulation period
Generation of two
storms of different
nature
(representativeness).
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Subestimation of 0 during the
peak of the storm.
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Subestimation of 0 during the
peak of the storm.
= . (lower dissipation)
increases the energy content for
all frequencies (overestimation of
high-frequency energy).
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Better agreement during the second
part of the storm.
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Better agreement during the second
part of the storm.
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Better agreement during the second
part of the storm.
= . yields an excess of
energy (lower dissipation,
overestimation of energy at high
frequencies).
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Subestimation of mean period 02
throughout the length of the storm.
Mean period
02 =
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
02 =
First storm
1/7 1/11
Subestimation of mean period 02
throughout the length of the storm.
Smaller ratio
Decrease
Better agreement: =
Mean period
2 =
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Subestimation of mean period 02
throughout the length of the storm.
Smaller ratio
Decrease
Better agreement: =
Mean period
02 =
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Good agreement.
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Good agreement.
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
First storm
1/7 1/11
Good agreement.
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Wind-sea (NW)
generation 1/15
Energy mainly provided
by wind.
Peak associated to
coastal wind jet of
high intensity and short
duration.
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Generation of a coastal wind jet of
high intensity and short duration at
the Ebro Delta.
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Generation of a coastal wind jet of
high intensity and short duration at
the Ebro Delta.
Spatially local.
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Generation of a coastal wind jet of
high intensity and short duration at
the Ebro Delta.
Spatially local.
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
Waves
Winds
Mean velocity 10
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Subestimation of the peak of the
storm (coastal wind jet).
Subestimation of low-frequency
energy (swell) at the beginning.
0 4 0
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Subestimation of the mean period
02 during the storm.
Peak period
02 =
, = 1 +
4. Analysis
Second storm
1/14 1/16
Good agreement.
, = 1 +
5. Conclusions
= = 2
2
Presence of swell
, = 1 +
5. Conclusions
Overestimation of highfrequency energy
The model dissipates less energy
than the corresponding one at high
frequencies.
Due to the dependence of on
the mean steepness of the waves
.
Other source terms ( or 4).
= = 2
2
, = 1 +
5. Conclusions
Overestimation of highfrequency energy
The model dissipates less energy
than the corresponding one at high
frequencies.
Due to the dependence of on
the mean steepness of the waves
.
Other source terms ( or 4).
Parametric tail of the spectrum.
Subestimation of periods due to the
increase of 2.
= = 2
2
, = 1 +
5. Conclusions
= = 2
2
Presence of wind-sea
Swell (low )
Wind-sea (high )
5. Conclusions
Omission of various peaks associated with coastal
wind jets
Insufficient temporal
resolution of wind fields.
6. Recommendations
Update the prsent formulation of the dissipation model (Komen et al., 1984), with
= . and = .
Explore new dissipation models (avoid dependence of mean wave steepness):
Snchez-Arcilla, Agustn
Gmez, Jess
Van Vledder, Gerbrant Ph.
Metodologia
Instrumentaci disponible
413900N,024912E
411648N,020824E
404312N,005848E
BS
Metodologia
Discretitzaci del domini
Dues malles anidades (flux dinformaci WM BS):
WM
Metodologia
Rang de freqncia
Dacord amb el rang de freqncia dels registres de
les boies corresponents (0.030-0.625 Hz).
El model treballa amb escala logartmica
(adaptaci).
Inicialitzaci
Primera simulaci realitzada en mode cold start.
No sassumeix cap condici de contorn a la malla
WM.
PROPAGS: propagaci
(advecci) i refracci computada
utilitzant un first-order
upwinding scheme .
, ,
, ,
+
Tota la fsica del model est continguda dins del programa Processing, on es duu a terme la
integraci del balan denergies.