Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PART 14
IN LAST months article we completed our review of Expansion Devices. In
this issue we commence a study of air to refrigerant and water to refrigerant
evaporators.
Direct Expansion Fin and Tube Evaporators
The primary function of any air conditioning system is to cool and dehumidify
air. In direct expansion (DX) systems this is achieved by bringing the air into
contact with an extended surface, which is being directly cooled by an
evaporating refrigerant. The evaporating refrigerant flows inside a tube, or
tubes, over which the air passes. The rate of heat transfer between the
refrigerant and the inside wall of the tube is very much greater than that
between the air and the outside of the tube. In order to compensate for this
inequality, the outside surface of the tube is enhanced by the addition of fins the ratio of external to internal surface area may be typically 20:1.
It is sometimes said that the last real advance in the design of air to fluid heat
exchangers was the addition of fins. Over the years various methods have
been used to achieve this, including the winding of a ribbon of copper,
aluminium or steel spirally round the outside of each tube, and even the use
of manually punched 'plate' fins individually soldered to the tubes. There have,
in reality, been a number of major advances in the manufacturing process,
and the modern day evaporator 'coil' is more compact, lighter in weight and
less expensive in real terms than its predecessors.
Manufacture
The basic construction of evaporator 'coils' today uses multi-row plate fins,
accurately spaced by collars raised during the punching process and thin wall
copper tubes. The tubes are inserted through the collared holes in the fins
and then expanded in diameter to give a good mechanical and thermal bond.
Fins
Fins are punched from very thin (0.1 - 0.25 mm) aluminium or copper strip or
foil on high-speed presses using specially designed tools. Each tool has a
fixed tube diameter and layout, but fin spacing, height of fins and rows deep
are usually adjustable. In addition to FLAT fins, different suppliers can also
offer a variety of fin patterns designed to enhance the heat transfer efficiency,
these include WAFFLED, WAVY and LOUVRED fins. The fin edges also may
be straight-cut or rippled.
Distributors
Distributors are used at the inlet to multi-streamed evaporators, to distribute
refrigerant to each stream. For two or three streams, distributors may be
formed from copper tube, but, more usually, they are accurately machined
brass components. Between the distributor and the evaporator inlets are the
'feeds', which are formed from lengths of small diameter copper tube. The
size of these 'feeds' is carefully selected so that their resistance accurately
controls the proportion of refrigerant entering each stream in the coil.
Suction Headers
Suction headers are simply pipes with stub tubes, which join together the
outlet ends of the streams of multi-streamed coils. They are of a diameter
appropriate to the number of streams and the total refrigerant flow through the
evaporator. In order to ensure circulation of oil and prevent oil logging in the
evaporator, the outlet from the suction header should be at, or below, the level
of the lowest stub tube, with any rise thereafter.
Pressure Testing
Following assembly, evaporator coils must be thoroughly tested for leaks.
This is normally carried out by immersing the coil in a tank of warm water and
filling it with dry air to a pressure of approximately 30 - 35 bar. The warm
water causes any bubbles, from leaking joints or faulty tubes, to rapidly
expand and thus becoming more readily visible.
Dehydration
After pressure testing, evaporator coils are internally dried, either by
evacuation in an oven, or by purging with dry (-40C dew point) air or
nitrogen.
DESIGN
Coil Face Dimensions
In designing an evaporator for a particular requirement, the factor which most
influences its dimensions is the volume flow rate of air to be cooled. The
finned height and finned length (face area) of the coil must be chosen to give
an acceptable face velocity (volume flow rate divided by face area). The rate
of heat transfer (ho) from the air to the surface of the fins increases with
increasing air velocity. The face velocity, therefore, should be sufficiently high
to ensure a good external heat transfer coefficient, but not so high that, too
high a resistance is imposed on the fan, or that any condensed moisture is
blown off the fins. The coil resistance varies roughly as the square of the face
velocity and moisture carryover can occur at velocities above 2 - 2.5 m/s.
FIGURE 1
Fin Spacing
Having chosen the coil face dimensions, fin spacing must be considered. As
the rate of heat transfer from the air to the evaporator is a function of surface
area, it would be natural to go for the maximum possible fin density.
Manufacturing considerations limit the closest fin spacing to around 1.5 mm
but, at this density, problems of high air resistance and the need for increased
levels of filtration to prevent blockage by dust particles make 1.8 - 2 mm a
more common choice. Moisture carryover is also likely to be more of a
problem with close fin spacing.
A further consideration regarding fin spacing are the operating conditions of
the evaporator. At low air volumes (fan speed at minimum) and low 'air-on'
temperatures (process rooms) there can be a risk of frosting. Once a coil
begins to be blocked by frost, the evaporating temperature will quickly fall,
leading to more latent cooling and increasing frost accumulation. Where these
conditions are likely, a wider fin spacing is usually chosen.
Dehumidification In the majority of air cooling processes using direct
expansion evaporators, moisture will be removed from the air. This process is
called dehumidification and is represented by the solid line on the
psychrometric chart shown in Figure 2. The total cooling duty per unit weight
of air is represented by the difference H on H off, whilst the weight of water
removed is W on W off.
FIGURE 2
Bypass Factor
It is clear that the slope of the solid line can be varied to give different values
of W off whilst keeping Hoff the same. This means that it is possible to have
the same total cooling duty with different amounts of dehumidification.
A method of predicting the slope of the cooling line has been developed which
uses the theory of 'bypass factors'. The idea of this assumes that some of the
air passes through the evaporator coil without coming into contact with any
cold surface, and consequently is unaffected. The remainder of the air is
assumed to be cooled to some point on the saturation curve. Mixing these two
air streams gives the actual air leaving condition. The proportion of the total
air stream, which bypasses the coil, is the 'bypass factor', and is represented
by B divided by A.
Bypass factors (BPF) have been established for various fins, which can be
used in predicting coil cooling performances. Knowing the heat transfer
performance of a particular coil design, together with the air and refrigerant
temperatures, it is possible to calculate a value for Hoff. The position of H sat
can be found by trying different values until (Hoff-H sat)/(Hon-H sat) = BPF.
The following graphs show typical values for bypass factors. The first shows
the effect of varying the fin spacing on a coil with a fixed number of rows of
tubes. As would be expected, higher bypass factors and hence more
dehumidification will result from wider fin spacing. In practice, with a fixed air
velocity and number of rows of tubes, the only way to maintain the total
cooling capacity of the evaporator would be to reduce the evaporating
temperature. This is why more moisture would be removed.
FIGURE 3
The second graph shows the effect of the number of rows of tubes in the coil
on the bypass factor, whilst keeping the fin spacing constant. It will be no
surprise to see less 'bypass' air with increasing coil depth and rows of tubes.
Again, however, if everything else is fixed, fewer rows of tubes will require
lower evaporating temperatures to achieve the same cooling duty.
FIGURE 4
Tube Size
The rate of heat transfer from the inside tube surface to the boiling refrigerant
(hi) increases with refrigerant velocity, as with air to fins. Again there has to be
a balance between high values of (hi) and system penalties associated with
high evaporator pressure drops. Unnecessary pressure losses through the
evaporator result in lower suction pressures at the compressor and reduced
compressor performance. Conversely, too low a pressure drop in a multistream coil can lead to poor refrigerant distribution.
In order to maintain an acceptable balance, the majority of evaporator coils
are multi-streamed. That is, the refrigerant flows through a number of
separate but parallel paths, or streams, from the inlet to the outlet of the coil.
At the inlet, the refrigerant is distributed between the various streams, using a
distributor as discussed earlier. Although some evaporator coils have large
numbers of streams in order to limit the pressure drop, ultimately a change in
coil tube diameter becomes necessary. Common tube diameters include 3/8",
1/2", 5/8" and 3/4". In some small domestic size air conditioners, even smaller
tubes are now being used. As a general rule, larger diameter tubes will be
spaced further apart, both vertically and between rows.
Coil Streaming
For optimum performance, evaporator coil streams are arranged to rise from
inlet to outlet. This is to allow the vapour to flow upwards through the boiling
liquid, rather than being forced downwards against its natural buoyancy.
Pressure drop through the coil causes the evaporating temperature to fall
from inlet to outlet. To take advantage of this, by maximising the effective
temperature difference between the air and refrigerant, a parallel flow
arrangement is used where the number of rows of tubes makes this possible.
The final one or two tubes in each stream, however, are arranged on the
warmer, air-on, side of the coil, in order to superheat the outlet gas with the
most efficient use of coil surface.