Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/102/Supplement_1/237.full.html
Present Significance
COMMENTARY
Intrauterine Growth as Estimated From Liveborn Birth-Weight Data at 24
to 42 Weeks of Gestation, by Lula O. Lubchenco et al, Pediatrics,
1963;32:793 800
Comments by Frank R. Greer, MD
ABSTRACT OF ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Data on the
birth weights of 5,635 live-born Caucasian infants at 24 to
From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
Wisconsin.
Received for publication Mar 19, 1998; accepted Mar 19, 1998.
Address correspondence to: Frank R. Greer, MD, Wisconsin Perinatal Center, Meriter Hospital, 202 S Park St, Madison, WI 53715.
PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright 1998 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
SUPPLEMENT
Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Indonesia:AAP Sponsored on March 22, 2014
237
238
SUPPLEMENT
Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Indonesia:AAP Sponsored on March 22, 2014
term outcome. According to Warkany: The unsatisfactoriness of our knowledge in this area is due,
to a great extent, to the false label attached to these
children, whose records are pooled with those of
the prematures. The lack of separation of the 2
types of children underweight at birth has led to a
neglect of observations and recordings necessary
for a better knowledge of this field. Indeed a
study in 1965 showed that there were as many
term as preterm infants born weighing ,2500 g in
the United States, and that the majority of preterm
infants were actually born with a birth weight
of .2500 g.7 Building on these reports and the
Lubchenco fetal growth curves, Battaglia and
Lubchenco8 then proposed the well known classification system of large for gestational age, small
for gestational age, and appropriate for gestational
age for determining at-risk infants for various
medical problems, initially focusing on increased
mortality rate8 and hypoglycemia.9 Usher10 and
Farr11,12 went on to begin the description of the
physical characteristics differentiating premature
and small for gestational age infants that also remain in wide use today.
After 35 years, the observations made by Lub-
chenco remain a keystone in the practice of neonatology. This work is truly a landmark in its field.
REFERENCES
1. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as
estimated from liveborn birth-weigh data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation.
Pediatrics. 1963;32:793 800
2. Parmelee AH. Management of the Newborn. Chicago, IL: The Year Book
Publishers, Inc; 1952;135
3. Silverman WA. Dunhams Premature Infants. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Paul
B. Hoeber; 1961:1
4. Babson SG, Behrman RE, Lessel R. Fetal growth: Liveborn birth weights for
gestational age of white middle-class infants. Pediatrics. 1970;45:937944
5. Usher R, McLean F. Intrauterine growth of live born Caucasian infants
at sea level: standards obtained from measurements of infants born
between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 1969;74:901910
6. Warkany J, Monroe BB, Sutherland BS. Intrauterine growth retardation.
Am J Dis Child. 1961;102:249 279
7. Jerushalmy J, van de Berg BJ, Erhardt CL, Jacobziner H. Birth weight
and gestation as indices of immaturity. Am J Dis Child. 1965;109:4357
8. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159 163
9. Lubchenco LO, Bard H. Incidence of hypoglycemia in newborn infants
classified by birth weight and gestational age. Pediatrics. 1971;47:831838
10. Usher R. Judgement of fetal age. II. Clinical significance of gestational
age and an objective method for its assessment. Pediatr Clin N Am.
1966;13:835 848
11. Farr V. The value of some external characteristics in the assessment of
gestational age at birth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1966;8:657 660
12. Farr V. The definition of some external characteristics used in the
assessment of gestational age in the newborn. Dev Med Child Neurol.
1966;8:507511
COMMENTARY
Reactions to the Threatened Loss of a Child: A Vulnerable Child Syndrome,
by Morris Green, MD, and Albert A. Solnit, MD, Pediatrics, 1964;34:58 66
Comments by Jack P. Shonkoff, MD
ABSTRACT OF ORIGINAL ARTICLE. This report describes a constellation of clinical features found in 25
children with a history of an illness or accident from
which they recovered, despite their parents anticipation
of a fatal outcome. The paper proposes the hypothesis
that children who are expected by their parents to die
prematurely often react with a disturbance in psychosocial development that is rooted in the parent-child relationship, which the authors characterize as a vulnerable
child syndrome. The essential features of the proposed
syndrome include difficulty with separation, infantile
behavior, bodily overconcerns, and school underachievement. The paper provides an overview of predisposing
factors and determinants of the presenting symptoms,
SUPPLEMENT
Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Indonesia:AAP Sponsored on March 22, 2014
239
References
Subspecialty Collections
Reprints