BEVERLY HILLS LAW CORP.

, PC
1 Sagar Parikh, Esq. (SBN 282655)
th
2 433 N. Camden Drive, 6 Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
3 Telephone: (310) 887-1338
Facsimile: (310) 982-2603
4
Bimali Walgampaya (SBN 266856)
5 LAW OFFICES OF WELLMAN & WARREN LLP
24411 Ridge Route Drive Suite 200
6 Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Telephone: (949) 580-3737
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
9
10

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

11

COUNTY OF ORANGE

12
13

ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a

Wyoming limited liability company,

COMPLAINT FOR:

14
15
16
17

Case No.:

Plaintiff,
1.
2.
3.

v.
IDRIS D. CLARK, an individual; and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

FRAUD AND DECEIT

MONEY HAD AND RECEIVED
CONVERSION

Defendants

18
19
20
21
22
23

COMES NOW, Plaintiff ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (Plaintiff) and hereby

24 submits its Complaint and alleges as follows:

25
26

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1.

Plaintiff is now, and at all times relevant herein has been a Wyoming limited liability

27 company.
28

2.

Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereupon alleges that Defendant IDRIS D.

-1COMPLAINT

1 CLARK (Clark) is an individual who at all times relevant herein has resided in the County of
2 Orange, State of California.
3

3.

Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate,

4 associate, or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, and, therefore,
5 sues these Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to allege their
6 true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon allege
7 each of these fictitiously named Defendants is responsible in some manner for the occurrences
8 herein alleged, and that Plaintiffs damages, as herein alleged, were proximately caused by such
9 Defendants.
10

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

11

COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION

12

4.

Plaintiff is a business entity that operates a variety of multi-level marketing

13 companies, including those in the medical industry.

14

5.

In or about July 2012, Clark represented to Plaintiffs principal, Jason Caramanis,

15 that Clark would provide medical consulting services to Plaintiff .

16

6.

In reliance on these representations made to Plaintiff, Plaintiff paid Clark $25,000

17 via check on July 7, 2012.

18

7.

Clark cashed this check, however, as of the date of this Complaint, Clark has not

19 provided any medical consulting services, or any other services to Plaintiff.

20

8.

Nor has Clark returned the $25,000 or any portion of this money to Plaintiff.

21

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

22

(Fraud and Deceit Against All Defendants)

23

9.

Plaintiff adopts and incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs by reference as

24 though fully set forth herein.

25

10.

In or about July 2012, Clark represented to Plaintiff that Clark could and would

26 provide medical consulting services to Plaintiff.

27

11.

Plaintiff, who needed such medical consulting services, relied on these

28 representations made by Clark and paid Clark a sum of $25,000 for medical consulting services.
-2COMPLAINT

12.

Plaintiff is informed, believes, and thereupon alleges that when Clark made the

2 representations to Plaintiff regarding the medical consulting services, Clark knew that he would not
3 be able to provide any such medical consulting services and that Clark never intended to provide
4 medical consulting services or help Plaintiff in any other manner.
5

13.

Plaintiff is further informed, believes, and thereupon alleges that when Clark made

6 the above representations to Plaintiff, Clark had the specific intention of defrauding Plaintiff by
7 misrepresenting to Plaintiff that Clark would provide medical consulting services to Plaintiff.
8

14.

Plaintiff actually and justifiably relied on the foregoing representations and paid

9 Clark a sum of $25,000.

10

15.

As a direct and proximate result of Clarks fraudulent actions and representations,

11 Clark has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but no less than $25,000. Plaintiff
12 has discovered the fraudulent misrepresentations of Clark within the last 3 years.
13

16.

Plaintiff is informed, believes, and thereupon alleges that the foregoing

14 representations of Clark were made willfully, wantonly, maliciously, intentionally, oppressive and
15 despicable and were done in willful and conscious disregard of the rights, welfare and safety of
16 Plaintiff, and that such fraudulent or wrongful conduct justifies an award of punitive damages
17 against Clark in an amount to be determined at time of trial.
18

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

19

(Money Had and Received Against All Defendants)

20

17.

Plaintiff adopts and incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs by reference as

21 though fully set forth herein.

22

18.

Clark received $25,000 that was to be used for the benefit of Plaintiff, specifically,

23 to provide Plaintiff with medical consulting services from Clark.

24

19.

This $25,000 was not used for the benefit of Plaintiff, as Clark did not ever provide

25 any medical consulting services or any other services for Plaintiff.

26

20.

As of the date of this Complaint, Clark has not returned any of the $25,000 to

27 Plaintiff.
28 //
-3COMPLAINT

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

(Conversion Against All Defendants)

21.

Plaintiff hereby adopts and incorporates by reference all prior paragraphs as though

4 fully set forth herein.

5

22.

Plaintiff gave Clark $25,000 for medical consulting services.

23.

Instead of providing medical consulting or any other services to Plaintiff, Clark

7 converted the funds for his own use.

24.

As a proximate result of Clarks conversion, Plaintiff has sustained damages in an

9 amount in excess of $25,000, precise amount to be proven at trial. Plaintiff has also expended
10 substantial time and money, including attorneys fees, in pursuit of the converted property as a
11 result of Clarks intentional acts.
25.

12

Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereupon alleges that in committing the acts

13 and/or omissions herein alleged, Clark acted willfully and with the intent to cause injury and
14 converted the above-described property belonging to Plaintiff, and acted with malice, oppression
15 and/or fraud as defined under Civil Code 3294, warranting an award of punitive damages against
16 Clark.
PRAYER FOR JUDGMENT

17

18 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Clark as follows:

19

1. For general damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but in an amount exceeding

$25,000;

20
21

2. For exemplary and punitive damages;

22

3. For restitutionary damages in an amount to be proven at trial;

23

4. For special and consequential damages in a sum according to proof at the time of trial;

24

5. For interest according to law;

25

6. For reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1021.5, or other
applicable law; and

26
27

7. For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

28

//
-4COMPLAINT