1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Eddie Haskel, pro se

Bebe Haskel, pro se
555 East Merry Lane
Phoenix, Arizona 85777
(623) 555-7777

IN THE UNITED STATES DITRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eddie Haskel, pro se and

Bebe Haskel, pro se

) Case no: CV-10-01000 GMS

)
Plaintiff,
)
Vs.
)
)
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, and/or his
successor, individually, and in his official )
capacity as PRES/CEO OF BAC HOME )

LOANS SERVICNG, LP, an ens legis

being used to conceal fraud,
JAMES F. TAYLOR and/or his successor,
individually, and in his official capacity as
PRES. OF FIN.& ADMIN. OF
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., an
ens legis being used to conceal fraud,
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, and/or his
successor, individually, and in his official
capacity as PRES/CEO OF BANK OF
AMERICA, an ens legis used to conceal
fraud,
ANGELO MAZILO, and/or his successor,
individually, and in his official capacity as
PRES/CEO OF COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS, INC., an ens legis being
used to conceal fraud,
R.K. ARNOLD and/or his successor,
individually, and in his official capacity as
PRES/CEO OF MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., an ens legis being used
to conceal fraud,
JOHN VELLA and/or his successor,
individually, and in his official capacity as
PRES/CEO EMC MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, an ens legis being used
to conceal fraud,
BEAR STERNS and/or its successor, an
ens legis being used to conceal fraud,
AND JOHN DOES (Investors) 1-10,000,
Et al,
Defendant.

JUDICIAL NOTICE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 4
NOTICE No. 4

(Assigned to Hon. G. More Snow)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

COMES NOW, Eddie Haskel, pro se Bebe Haskel, pro se, (Hereafter Plaintiff),
hereby submits the following JUDICIAL NOTICE.
FOURTH JUDICIAL NOTICE:
PLAINTIFF REFUSES TO PARTICIPATE IN DEFENDANTS FRUADLENT
AND/OR CRIMINAL AND/OR TERRORIST ACTIVITIES:
There is no law that can or does require Plaintiff to participate in Defendants
criminal and/or fraudulent and/or terrorist activities. In fact, Defendants fraudulent and/or

criminal and/or terrorist activities have discharged all obligations and/or instruments in

this matter, pursuant to, inter alia, the U.C.C. and Arizona Law.

10

Defendants often claim that the U.C.C. does not apply in these matters, which is a

11

blatant obfuscation of the law. Arizona has accepted in totality the U.C.C. as it relates to

12

ALL matters of and in commerce. Defendants often claim that U.C.C. does not apply in

13

non-judicial foreclosures; such is simply a lawyers trick to confuse the issue. Of course

14

the U.C.C. applies, but the presumption is that the lawyers have been honest and are in

15
16
17
18
19

compliance. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, since Plaintiff has rebutted
the fraudulent presumption that Defendants are in compliance with the U.C.C., Defendants
MUST immediately Present and Exhibit for this Courts inspection the Original
Promissory Note and prima facie evidence of Defendants authority to act, pursuant to,
inter alia, U.C.C. 3-501(B)(2).
Defendants failure to adhere to the U.C.C. notwithstanding, Defendants fraud and

20

criminal and terrorist activity has vitiated all purported obligations of Plaintiff as fraud

21

vitiates everything according to the Supreme Court of the United States.

22
23
24
25
26
27

DATED: This 39th day of June, in the year, of our Lord, 2010.
BY: ____________________________, agent
Eddie Haskel, pro se
Signed reserving all my rights at UCC 1-308
BY: ____________________________, agent
Bebe Haskel, pro se
Signed reserving all my rights at UCC 1-308

28
2