Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
BI0
JOURNAL
OF GEOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
SEPTEMBER
10, 1979
loading.
In condu,cting
thisexperimental
program,
however,lected
fo'rstudy.
Westerly
granite
wasselected
because
ofthe
and fracture
that are
5525
5526
SCHOLZ
ANDKOCZYNSKI:
FATIGUEOFROCK
Palisades
PD
60
E.zo
Fig. i.
of-3
ANISOTROPY
5527
TABLE 1. ExperimentalResults
Normalized
Stress
Stress
Rate
Experi- Difference (),
ment
(a/el)
Con-
fining Cycles
to
Pressure,
Failure
MPa/s MPa
(N)
eat Failure,X10-
Failure
Average 4
4h
Cycle
Amplitude,
Time, s
MPa
WesterlyGranite'B' Block
22
21'
23*
24*
25*
11'
14'
20*
16'
18'
44
0.869
0.823
0.825
0.840
0.821
0.802
0.814
0.816
0.843
0.847
0.840
40
39
38
37
36
41
35
31
30
42
45
33
29
34
47
46
48
0.825
0.820
0.817
0.887
0.879
0.820
0.902
0.818
0.824
0.820
0.870
0.812
0.863
0.782
0.820
0.820
0.820
49
50
51
0.935
0.855
0.902
32
0.974
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0.1
100
100
I
I
100
I
I
I
creep
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
10
10
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
10
10
11
3
13
18
13
15
6
3
I
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1.2
37
24
106
260
3200
100
300
300
300
2
39
18
215
11
124
50
2
18
80
1.2
44
18
6.3
11.6
7.1
13.9
18.9
4.2
3.9
6.2
6.3
4.7
......
......
0
0
'"
0
0
.........
13.3
4.4
11.2
......
10.1
8.3
0
0
5
0
0
5
0
10
15
45
0
10
0
WesterlyGranite',4' Block
10.4
6.0
7.3
8.7
11.5
6.9
10.4
7.7
8.3
11.3
10.1
7.9
9.8
7.9
7.7
6.6
5.9
6.9
4.6
5.2
6.3
5.8
5.6
7.8
6.6
6.6
7.8
7.5
5.6
6.8
4.2
6.5
4.7
5.3
8.6
5.3
6.2
7.5
8.6
6.2
9.1
7.1
7.4
9.5
8.8
6.7
8.3
6.1
7.1
5.6
5.6
159
67
131
-20
56
138
159
147
46
52
15
155
110
56
-30
8
37
170
66
106
-24
47
137
115
93
40
90
30
150
117
56
72
-37
-42
5.9
4.9
5.4
103
101
177
135
90
126
8.8
5.0
6.0
7.4
4.2
4.6
15
30
2X 10 4
7.5 X 10 a
1.8 X 10 a
500
100
600
4 x 102
i x 104
5x 103
Palisades Diabase
52
520'{' 10
100 I
3.0
1.8 2.4
4
70
0
5X 10
53
545'{' 10
100 24
5.2 3.1 4.2
20
75
0
2.6X103
54
586'{' 10
100 114
......
4.0
......
80 1.2X104
55
585'{'
10
100 I
4.3
2.9 3.6
80 -70
20
6X 102
The
angles
0,4,and
tarereferenced
to0inthedirection
orthogonal
toxxand
thecylinder
axis
inWG'B'
samples,
areunreferenced
in
WG'A'specimens,
andarereferenced
to0inthexxdirection
forPalisades
diabase
specimens.
*Water
saturated.
$Maximum
stress
differences
arereported
forthisrock,
since
a standard
static
strength
was
notdetermined.
thatalthough
creepisimportant,
it isnotthe
anisotropy
of el. We wished,
however,
to determine
if this below,however,
sole
contributor
to
cyclic
fatigue
failure.
anisotropy
wascontrolled
bytheriftplaneoftherock,sothe
thate in WG'B'specimens
is highlyanieI gauges
wereoriented
either
at0,90,or45fromthestrike Figure2 shows
sotropic.
The dilatantstrains
occuralmostentirelyin the
of that plane.
perpendicular
to therift plane.Verylowstrains
are
We showin Figure2 resultsfrom four experiments
with direction
reported
parallel
to
it,
and
these
strains
do
not
increase
signifiorientedstraingauges.
The maximum
valuesof ei achieved
cycling.
Strainsmeasured
withgauges
duringeachcycleareplottedversus
cyclenumber;
thearrows cantlywithrepeated
orientedat 45fromtherift planeshowintermediate
behavior.
Furthermore,
the
fracture
plane
in
WG'B'
samples
always
tivepatternin timesimilarto thatof a creepcurve(seealso
indicatewhere fracture occurred.The strainsshow a cumula-
intheriftplane(except
forexperiment
18,whichfailed
Figure3).Initially,thereisaprimary
stage
inwhich
therateof formed
fracture
attheendof thespecimen).
Fromthis
additional
strainproduced
in eachcyclediminishes
withcycle witha punch
number,followedby a secondary
stagein whichthe rateof
newstraindevelopment
percyclereaches
a steadystate,after
whichit accelerates
duringthetertiarystage.In testsat high
stressthe tertiarystagemaydominate
throughout
(Figure2,
experiments
16and24). Fromthissimilarity
withcreepone
Hadley
[1975]
andourselves
withWG'B'samples
iscontrolled
bythepreexisting
preferred
orientation
of microcracks
inthe
riftplaneofWesterly
granite
andthatthisalsocontrolled
the
orientation of the fracture plane.
Westerly
granite'A'. Sincetheaxesof thesesamples
were
mightatfirstconclude
thatcyclic
fatigue
isnothing
morethan
oriented
perpendicular
to
the
rift
plane
in
Westerly
granite,
the
creeprupturebroughtaboutby cumulative
dilatantcreep
strong
influence
of
the
preferred
orientation
of
cracks
in
this
[Scholz,
1968]
produced
during
repeated
cycling.
Wewillshow
5528
SCHOLZANDKOCZYNSKI:FATIGUEOF ROCK
14--
90
D2-XooooooooOooooO
oooOO
OOXXXXXXXX
XX XXX Xx x X
+ + + + + + + +
+
+
IO
I0
+ + + + + + +
15
20
CYCLE
45
strong dilatancy anisotropy developed.The anisotropy, however, is somewhatsmallerin magnitude:the ratio of the maxi-
In Figure3, j-m,x
represents
the cumulative
development
of
dilatancyduringthecyclicloadingof the rock,whereas
j-m,,
We listthe maximum,j-,,andminimum,j-,principalstrains
at failurein Table I aswellas, thedirectionof q relativeto
the j-0strain gauge(Figure lc). We also measured19,the
o
o
o
o o
ooOOO
o00
o
--
x-
x x
xxxxxxxXXXXXX
+ + + + +
x
+
+
+
+
x x
x
+ + +
150
+ + +
+
+
I00 o
00000000000000000000
XxXXXXxx x
+++++++++
0 x x Xx xx xXXXXX
50
-o
x
x+++++++++++
+
I0
15
CYCLE
20
I
50
I
i00 o
I
150 o
SCHOLZANDKOCZYNSKI:FATIGUEOF ROCK
5529
150
IOO
50
50
I00
150
Fig. 6. The directionof maximumintrinsiclinearcompressibility, In this sectionwe turn to other aspectsof the responseof
, in the plane is plotted versus for the Westerlygranite 'A' rock to large cyclic loads. These results are not only in-
experiments.
thedilatancy
anisotropy
andorientation
of thefracture
plane reasons
thatwillbeapparent
below,
weplotthereonlydata
are controlled
by the preexisting
preferred
orientation
of fortests
atPc= 100MPa,6 = I MPas-', andstandard
cycle
cracks
withintherock.Thatis,thegreatest
dilatancy
isper- amplitude
forWG'B'(pluses)
andWG'A'(solidcircles).
AIpendicularto the grain plane,and the strike of the fracture is
parallel to it.
Palisadesdiabase. Dilatancy anisotropywas also observed
in this rock and was nearly as large as in WG'A'. One difference was observed. In Westerly granite, anisotropy was observed during the first loading cycle and maintained a fairly
constant level throughout the experiment until the tertiary
phase,where it typically increased(Figures2 and 3). In the
multicycleexperimentswith the diabase,however, dilatancy
was nearly isotropic during the first cycle and progressively
developedduring subsequentcycles.
In three of the four experiments(Table 1) the strike of the
fracture plane developedparallel or subparallelto the direction of maximum residual stressin the rock, and in two of the
cases this correlated with the minimum z direction. Ani-
+%o
+4,
.8O
5530
o-/o-f
_-0.82
' ../
'
& = I MPa/sec
800
,oo
..' ..-'
eee
/
o'/o-f = 0.82
....'/
eeee
e e
,,
e ee
400
00
m (MP)
; sac....-
I04
.-' d"'""
I05
I06
though the scatteris considerable,which is typicalof all timedependentrock strengthproperties,the data for both rock
orientationsindicate a logarithmictrend similar to the earlier amplitude, were conductedat loading ratesthat varied over 3
results.Both WG'B' and WG'A' data indicate a similar slope, orders
of magnitude
in orderto explorethisbehavior.
or fatigue sensitivity,but the WG'B' data are systematically
In Figure 8 we show the l - a loop for the initial cycleof
lower, indicating a smaller static strengthof about 2%. This three samplersof WG'A' loaded identically but at different
maynotbedueto orientation,
how,ever,
sinceall theWG'B' rates.The data in the figure are from the l gaugesshowingthe
data in Figure 7 are from water-saturatedsamples,whereasthe largeststrainsin each case.The differencesbetweenthem are
WG'A' specimens
werenominallydry. Water saturationcould not due to anisotropy,sinceeachof the three gaugeson each
producesucha reductionin strengthby enhancingstresscor- sample,when comparedin a similar way, showsimilardifferrosion, and the two dry experimentswith WG'B' sampleswere ences. It is clear from the figure that the lower the rate, the
ambiguousin resolvingwhich parameterwas responsiblefor greater the dilatant strain at the samestresslevel.Thus timethis slight differencein strength. In any case, neither water dependent deformation takes place progressivelyduring the
saturationnor specimenorientation appearsto producegross loadingcycle,and sincethisdeiormation
involves
dilatancy,
differencesin the fatigue behavior of this rock in spiteof the we conclude that it results from stresscorrosion cracking
strong differencethe latter producesin dilatancy anisotropy. [Schlz,
1968].Figure8 alsonicelyillustrates
whyweareno
Effect of loadingrate. HaimsonandKim [ 1971] and Hardy Ion:rusing
theconcept
ofC',thenset
ofdilatancy
[Brace
et
and Chugh[1970] did severalcyclicexperimentsat ratesvaried al., 1966].Wecannot
withanycC"iainty
determine
a valuefor
by about a factor of 4 and failed to detect a rate effect on C' fromanyof these
curves
or'6mpare
thatvaluebetween
fatigue. However, in view of the fundamentaltime dependence them, other than to saythat dilatancybecomesmoreevidentat
of the strengt of rock owing to stresscorrosioncracking lower stressesat lower loading rates.
[Scholz, 1968, 1972], it seemslikely that suchan effect exists.
Fhenumber
of cycles
to failureis shown
in Figure9 asa
Furthermore, the similarityof the fatiguecurve(Figures2 and functionof loadingrate for samplestestedunder'otherwise
3) to the creepcurveand of the S-N curveto the staticfatigue identicalconditiqns.A rate effectis clearlyev,dent:those
curve [Kranz and Scholz, 1977] arguesthat time-dependent samplesthat loaded at faster rates undergomore cyclesprior
dilatancythrough stresscorrosioncrackingis important, if not to failure. We also show in the figure, as da.shedlines, two
fundamental,to cyclic fatigue of rock. A number of experi- extremehypotheses.
We first might assumethat failure occurs
ments, at the samepeak load, confiningpressure,and cycle solelyas a resultof progressivestresscorrosioncrackingand
that thereforeeachsamplefailsafter a fixedelapsedtime ,under
o-/f =.82
fromweakening
duetocycling.
In thatcaseeachsamP!e
would
fail after a fixed number of cyclesirrespec.tive
of the loading
rate, as indicatedby the line labeled'cyclicfatigue.'The data
clearly indicate a behavior intermediate between these ex.tremes,showingthat cyclicfatigue of rock is a resultof both
progressive
stresscorrosioncrackingand damageproducedby
cycling.
Effect of cycleamplitude. In all the experimentsthus far
O.I
described,the minimum stressdifferencein eachcyclewas25
MPa. We alsowishedto seewhat would happenif we dictests
i
I
IO
IOO
at the samepeak stressand loadingrate but at highervaluesof
COES TO FA,URE
the minimum stress.In theseteststhen the mean stressduring
Fig. 9. The effect of loading rate on cyclic fatigue for Westerly
granite 'A'. The line labeledstatic fatigue is one of constantelapsed each cycle would be higher than in the standard test, which
time underload, and that labeledcyclicfatigueis one of constantcycle might increasethe amount of stresscorrosioncrackingduring
number. Seethe text for explanation.
eachcycle,but the cycleamplitudewould be smallerand thus
SCHOLZANDKOCZYNSK!.'
FATIGUEOF ROCK
5531
CREEP
0.1
section.
Wecouldthenalsocompare
theseresults
witha creep
testatthesame
peakstress,
since
thatistheend-member
ofthe
serieS,With zero cycleamplitude.
The ri:sultsof such experimentsare given in Figure 10,
wherewe plot total elapsedtime to fractureversuscycleamplitude for a suite of experiments,each conductedwith 6 = l
MPa s-;,. (r/trf = 0.82, and Pc = 100 MPa. We found that
failure time is a double-valuedfunctionof cycleamplitude.As
I00
I0
(x)f, o-S
Fig. 12. The averagex strain at fracture is plotted versusloading
rate for WG'A'. The upper data point is from the creeptest.
hysteresis
loopsizeinbreases
rapidly,resulting
in anincrease
in
STRESS
F REMOVED
discussion.
These experimentsshowedidentical characteristicsto the experimentsat Pc = 100 MPa, and all the specimens
eventually
failed. The three experimentsat 300 MPa, in fact, showa S-N
trend similar
Thus we find no
90
I0
20
30
CYCLES
2.0
.9
.7
(Ez)f, I0-$
5532
510 _oo
o
o
: 10-4sec
-I
o
o
o
490-
o
o
o
o
o
OoooOo
470-
Ooo o
450C;
I0
2_0
:50
the eleventh cycle was again large, as in the first cycle, and
immediately stabilized to a steadyvalue on the twelfth cycle.
This type of recovery has been observedbefore, in acoustic
emissionmeasurementsby Goodman[ 1963],and was discussed
by Scholzand Kranz [1974]. Sufficientexperimentswere not
performed to determine if the increased rate of deformation
after reloadingis a generalphenomenon,perhapsdueto damage resultingfrom the releaseof the confiningpressure.
Severalrelaxationexperimentswerecarriedout, usingloading piston displacementas the servofeedbacksignal(Figure
14). Stresswas found to relax in a way expectedfrom the
fatiguecurve(Figures2 and 3), but theseexperimentswere not
carried long enoughto determine if failure would occur under
relaxation
conditions.
CYCLES
We have found that cyclic fatigue of rock at low temperature is a brittle processinvolving the cumulativegrowth of
real but is a reductionrather than a stabilizationof fatigueby internal cracks that produce dilatant strains and result in
pressure.Experimentation at pressureslower than 100 MPa brittle fracture. Unlike the ductile metals, fatigue rupture of
will be required to resolvethis issue,sincemost of the effectof rock produces a brittle shear fracture macroscopicallyindistinguishablefrom brittle fracture producedin a convenpressureis in the range0.1-100 MPa [Kranz, 1979].
Strain at fracture. Kranz and Scholz[1977] have recently tional fracturetestor, for that matter,in creeprupture(see,for
pointed out that tertiary creep beginsin rock when the in- example,Kranz and Scholz [1977]).
elastic dilatant strain reaches a critical value. This would be a
useful criterion for rock failure if this critical strain is a univer-
Notice
thatthereisa strong
increase
in (eDfwithpeakload. causing
a crackto propagate
spontaneously.
Type2 issubThisisseveral
times
grehter
thanthecalculated
contribution
of critical
crackgrowth
aidedbystress
corrosion.
Therateat
elastic
strain(solidlinein Figure11),indicating
thatfailure which
thisoccurs
isstrongly
dependent
onstress,
waterconoccurswith greater dilatancy at higher peak stresses.
centration, and temperature [Scholz, 1972; Martin, 1972]. Finally, thereis type 3, fatiguecracking.This type of crackingis
producedby the working of cracksas they openand closein
responseto cyclicloading.The area within the hysteresisloop
is a measureof the number of cracksbeingworked during a
/il= oant
-rn
(1)
/ X
STRESS
CRACK
/6
F % COR
ROAS*ION
WORKING
t
0
200
400
600
ci
-2
CYCLEAMPLITUDE,
MP
a
creased,
atafaster
rate
than
before,
butnoprimary
stage
waspredicted
bytheparameter
A*/As*,
and
fatigue
cracking,
proporobserved.
Theparameter
co
decreased
toasteady
value
duringtional
toas/a,fortheexperiments
withthesame
peak
stress
but
thefirst10cycles,
asin Figure4. Afterrecovery,
however,
coon different
cycle
amplitude.
Seetextforexplanation.
5533
ao--O'p--fro
T tt-2/adt
A*=E
0fF
loop
and
hence
type
3cracking
are
strongly
reduced
(Figure
(2) mately
15).
Thus
experiments
30,31,and
33,stressed
toapproxia/a t = 0.82 at standardcycleamplitude,broke after a
whereA* isthetotalstrainproduced
bycreep
inthetestand fewtensof cycles
in a fewhours,whereas
experiment
46,
wetaken = 4 andrn= ]. Thisintegration
yieldstheresult stressed
to thesamepeakvaluebutcycled
overonlythetop
100 MPa of load, withstood 3200 cyclesover 8 days. In the
latter case the hysteresiswas too small to be measured,and
455(243a4
+ 81aSaP
+ 54a2aP
+ 42aaPS
+ 35ap4)
almost all cracking was therefore type 2.
Although to first order, dilatancy at fracture is a constant,
(3)
there are the observedeffectsof stressand rate on this paramewhich predictsthe observedtime dependence
of strainat peak ter (Figures 11 and 12). Theseeffectsindicatethat althoughwe
stressaveragedover many cycles(see Figure 3, for example). do not know at presentthe microscopicdifferencesbetween
We plot, in Figure 15, the normalizedparameter A*/As*, the three types of cracks, it is clear that either the cracks
3otT / a
parameter
isplotted
inFigure
15,where
5 wasmeasured
asthe thatmanymoretype2 thantype3 cracks
canbetolerated
maximum
width
ofthel hysteresis
loopduring
thesecondary
(Figure
12).In those
data(Figure
12)theexperiments
athigh
stage
offatigue
foreach
ofthetests
compared
inFigure
10.We rates
underwent
more
cycles
inless
elapsed
timeandproduced
notice
thatthisparameter
decreases
withdecreasing
cycle
am- less
strain
thandidthose
atlower
rates.
However,
asstress
and
plitude.
Type3 andtype2 cracking
seem
to besimilar
in cycle
amplitude
areincreased,
theamount
ofdilatancy
also
importance
in these
tests,
judging
fromtheresults
shown
in increases
(Figure
11).
Figure9 andfromthefactthatthefracture
timeforthe These
results
therefore
show
thatnotonlyisdilatancy
typistandard
cycle
amplitude
testwasnearly
thesame
asforthe callyanisotropic
owingto subtle
microstructural
anisotropy
creep
testat thesame
peakstress
(Figure
10).Therefore
the butthreedifferent
types
of cracks
and/orcrackdistributions
totalamount
of dilatancy
thatwill occurin a givenelapsedcanresultin dilatancy
andthatrockfracture
is sensitive
to
timeshouldtakea form similarto thesumof thetwocurvesin whichtypeis prevalent.
Figure 15. Since,to first order, the amount of dilatancyat
fracture
isconstant,
theresults
shown
inFigure
15predict
that
APPENDIX:
SERVO-CONTROLLED
TRIAXIAL
ascycle
amplitude
isdecreased
fromthestandard
amplitude,
fracture time should at first increase,have a maximum at
abouta = 300MPa (wheretheminimumin A*/As* + &a/&a
occurs),and thendecrease
again.This is quite similarto the
observedbehavior(Figure 10). In Figure 15 we indicatethat
stresscorrosioncrackingdominatesthe deformationat high
mean stressand low cycleamplitudeand that crackworking
effectsdominate for large cycleamplitude tests.
The single-cycle,constantloading rate fracture test producestype I and type 2 cracking,the proportionof type 2
decreasing
as the loadingrate increases.
In a creeptest,type 1
TESTING
APPARATUS
5534
Sc.oLz
D. Holcomb
reviews. Lamont-
cortrolled,
or a displacement
transducer
(LVDT),in which Attewell, P. B., and I.
monitoring the travel of this cylinder with an LVDT the volu- Constantino, M. S., Statistical variation in stress-volumetric strain
behavior of Westerly granite, Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 15,
metric strainof the samplecan be measureddirectly,without
105-111, 1978.
using strain gauges.
Friedman, M., and J. M. Logan, Influenceof residualelasticstrain on
Porepressureis servo-controlledby a double-actingAminco
the orientation of experimental fractures in three quartzose sandpump driven by a second5-cm Miller cylinder which is also
stones,J. Geophys.Res., 75, 387-405, 1970.
controlled by a Moog servovalve.If constantpore pressureis Goodman, R. E., Subaudiblenoiseduring compressionof rocks,Geol.
Soc. Amer. Bull., 74, 487-490, 1963.
required, feedbackis from a BLH Corp. pressurecell in the
K., Azimuthal variation of dilatancy, J. Geophys.Res., 80,
pore pressuresystem.If a constant(or variable) pore pressure . Hadley,
4835-4850, 1975.
gradient acrossthe sample is required, as in a permeability Hadley, K., The effectof cyclic stresson dilatancy, another look, J.
test, a differential pressuretransducer,capable of detecting
Geophys.Res., 81, 2471-2474, 1976.
pressuredifferencesof 0.01 MPa at 500-MPa ambient pres- Haimson, B.C., and C. M. Kim, Mechanical behavior of rock under
sure, is used for feedback.
ondilatancy
in Westerly
graniteunderuniaxialandtriaxialconditions,J. Geophys.
Res.,80, 1526-1530,
1975.
piston
load
ortravel
exceeds
presettable
levels
andshuts
offall
(Received
October
3,1978;
system
powerif operation
isunattended
anda fail-safe
condi-
revised
March
23,1979;
accepted
April 12, 1979.)