Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Roeleveld1
Department of Mechanical &
Industrial Engineering,
Ryerson University,
350 Victoria Street,
Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
e-mail: droeleve@ryerson.ca
D. Naylor
Department of Mechanical &
Industrial Engineering,
Ryerson University,
350 Victoria Street,
Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
W. H. Leong
Department of Mechanical &
Industrial Engineering,
Ryerson University,
350 Victoria Street,
Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
Free Convection in
Asymmetrically Heated
Vertical Channels
With Opposing Buoyancy
Forces
Laser interferometry and flow visualization were used to study free convective heat transfer inside a vertical channel. Most studies in the literature have investigated buoyancy
forces in a single direction. The study presented here investigated opposing buoyancy
forces, where one wall is warmer than the ambient and the other wall is cooler than the
ambient. An experimental model of an isothermally, asymmetrically heated vertical channel was constructed. Interferometry provided temperature field visualization and flow visualization was used to obtain the streamlines. Experiments were carried out over a range
of aspect ratios between 8.8 and 26.4, using temperature ratios of 0, 0.5, and 0.75.
These conditions provide a modified Rayleigh number range of approximately 5 to 1100.
In addition, the measured local and average Nusselt number data were compared to numerical solutions obtained using ANSYS FLUENT. Air was the fluid of interest. So the Prandtl
number was fixed at 0.71. Numerical solutions were obtained for modified Rayleigh numbers ranging from the laminar fully developed flow regime to the turbulent isolated
boundary layer regime. A semi-empirical correlation of the average Nusselt number was
developed based on the experimental data. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4026218]
Keywords: interferometry, flow visualization, numerical modeling, natural convection,
vertical channel
Introduction
TC T1
TH T1
(1)
1
Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the
JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received September 11, 2013; final
manuscript received November 28, 2013; published online March 7, 2014. Assoc.
Editor: Zhixiong Guo.
There have been numerous studies on free convection in isothermally heated vertical channels. Elenbaas [2] was one of the
first to study heat flow in a symmetrically (i.e., TH TC, RT 1),
isothermally heated vertical channel. Using two square plates separated by various channel spacings, he was able to obtain experimental data for a wide range of modified Rayleigh numbers.
Some analytical work determined that the Nusselt number
approaches two asymptotes at the upper and lower modified Rayleigh numbers. An overall channel average Nusselt number correlation was developed using the analytical work and experimental
data.
Aung et al. [3] studied the conditions of a uniform heat flux and
a uniform wall temperature in an asymmetrically heated vertical
channel. Numerical solutions were obtained over a wide range of
modified Rayleigh numbers and some experimental work was performed to verify the results. They showed that, for uniform wall
temperatures, a nearly universal curve can be used to relate the
Nusselt numbers and the modified Rayleigh numbers for a wide
range of temperature ratios. This is the case if the Nusselt number
and Rayleigh number are defined by using the appropriate characteristic temperature difference. This characteristic temperature
difference is defined as
DT
TH TC
T1
2
(2)
C 2014 by ASME
Copyright V
asymptotes at low and high modified Rayleigh numbers to develop correlations. They developed correlations for both isothermal and isoflux conditions in symmetrically and asymmetrically
heated vertical channels. The new correlations were developed to
fit various experimental and numerical data. A review of all the
correlations was performed by Raithby and Hollands [5]. It was
determined that the best correlation for the overall channel average Nusselt number for isothermally heated channel walls is
2
0
!1:9
1=1:9
1:9
@0:618Rab=L1=4
Nu 4 Nufd
qH qC b
2kDT
(4)
where qH and qC are the average convective heat fluxes at the hot
and cold walls in the vertical channel and k is the fluid thermal
conductivity. The hot wall heat flux is always positive and the
cold wall heat flux is usually negative in the negative temperature
ratio cases. All air properties are evaluated at the film temperature,
unless otherwise noted. The film temperature is defined as
Tf
TH TC =2 T1
2
(5)
4R2T 7RT 4
901 RT 2
Rab=L
(6)
Various channel heating configurations were studied by BarCohen and Rohsenow [4] using analytical expressions for the
(7)
where Nufd is determined from Eq. (6). There have been many
other studies on asymmetrically, isothermally heated vertical
channels with positive temperature ratios [610]. The existing
correlations from the literature cannot accurately predict the heat
transfer of the negative temperature ratio cases.
There are three studies in the literature that investigate opposing buoyancy forces in free convection of an antisymmetrically
(i.e., RT 1) heated vertical channel. The antisymmetrical case
is where the temperature difference between the hot wall and the
ambient is the same as the temperature difference between the ambient and the cold wall (i.e., TH T1 T1 TC). Habib et al.
[11] studied turbulent flow in an antisymmetrically (RT 1)
heated vertical channel with a channel aspect ratio of 3.125. The
Rayleigh number was 2.0 106, with the hot wall 10 C above
ambient and the cold wall 10 C below ambient. (The Rayleigh
number was defined based on the channel height and the temperature difference between the hot wall and the ambient temperature.)
Velocity profiles of the flow were determined using a laser
Doppler anemometer. The results showed a large vortex flow,
with the air flowing up the hot wall and down the cold wall similar
to flow inside a tall vertical cavity.
Ayinde et al. [12] also investigated turbulent flow in an antisymmetrically heated vertical channel. Two temperature differences of TH TC 15 C and 30 C were used between the two
channel walls. Two aspect ratios of 6.25 and 12.5 and two
Rayleigh numbers of 1.0 108 and 2.0 108 were studied. (The
Rayleigh number was defined based on the channel height and the
temperature difference between the hot wall and the ambient.) A
particle image velocimeter was used to determine velocity profiles
and a correlation for dimensionless flow rate inside the channel
was developed. The results indicated that the flows entering at the
top and bottom of the channel were mixed with the recirculated
flow inside the channel before exiting the other side of the channel. The results also showed that the flow pattern inside the channel was similar to a sealed tall enclosure. In these two
experimental studies, velocity field measurements were made for
the antisymmetrical case, in relatively low aspect ratio channels
(A < 13). In contrast, the present work investigates the convective
heat transfer rates in higher aspect ratio channels (typically
A > 13) at lower Rayleigh numbers and over a wider range of negative temperature ratios.
The antisymmetrical case (RT 1) is a special case that has
been recently investigated by Roeleveld et al. [13]. Similar to the
current study, flow visualization and laser interferometry were
used to study free convection in an open-ended vertical channel.
The heat transfer rates were also determined using laser interferometry and a numerical model was developed to solve over a
wide range of Rayleigh numbers. The Rayleigh number was
defined based on the channel spacing and the temperature difference between the hot and cold walls. The special nature of the
RT 1 case can be illustrated by noting that the modified Rayleigh and Nusselt numbers will always be zero using the definitions in the current paper, Eqs. (3) and (4). The flow- and
temperature-field were found to have similarities to that of a tall
sealed enclosure. It was determined that the average convective
heat transfer of the antisymmetrical case can be approximated
(8)
2.3 Laser Interferometry. A 200 mm diameter beam MachZehnder Interferometer was used to obtain temperature field
measurements. A 15 mW helium-neon laser was used in a standard MZI as described in Goldstein [15]. The interferometer has
two settings: infinite fringe mode and finite fringe mode. The infinite fringe setting was used for temperature field visualization,
because a line of constant fringe shift is an isotherm in this mode.
The finite fringe mode was used for the heat transfer measurements. For steady cases, the interferogram was photographed with
a high resolution (39 megapixels) still image camera and for the
unsteady cases, a high speed digital movie camera was used.
The local Nusselt numbers on each channel wall were determined using the gradient measurement technique as described by
Poulad et al. [16]. The temperature gradient at the cold surface
was calculated using
Rk0 TS2 @e
@T
(9)
@x x0 WPG @xx0
where R is the gas constant, k0 is the wavelength of the laser light
in a vacuum, Ts is the absolute surface temperature (in this case,
Ts TC), P is the absolute pressure and G is the Gladstone-Dale
constant. (It should be noted that R 287 J/kg K for air,
k0 632.8 nm for a helium-neon laser, and G 0.226 103 m3/
kg for a helium-neon laser in air.) The fringe gradient normal to
the measurement surface, @e=@xjx0 , was extracted from the finite
fringe interferograms using a custom MATLAB [17] image processing code developed by Poulad et al. [16]. A scan of pixel intensity was taken along a horizontal line at the y-location of interest.
A nonlinear regression technique similar to Slepicka and Cha [18]
was used to unwrap the phase from the pixel intensity data. The
pixel intensity near the surface was expressed as
Ix Iavg F sinDx x1 /
(10)
@xx0 2p
For the hot surface at x b, the temperature and fringe gradients
were similarly calculated using Eqs. (9) and (11), respectively.
Using the temperature gradient, the local heat fluxes on the cold
and hot walls of the channel were calculated using
@T
@T
and qy;H ks
(12)
qy;C ks
@x x0
@x xb
where ks is the thermal conductivity of the air at the surface temperature. The hot wall heat flux is always positive and the cold
wall heat flux is typically negative in this study. The local Nusselt
number was defined as
Nuy;C
qy;C b
qy;H b
and Nuy;H
DTk
DTk
(13)
1
2L
L
Nuy;C dy
Nuy;H dy
(14)
Table 1 Measured
uncertainties
Parameter
Channel height
Channel width
Channel spacing
Specific heat
Dynamic viscosity
Thermal conductivity
Pressure
Surface temperature
Temperature difference
Fringe gradient
variables
Symbol
and
their
estimated
Measured value
L
264.2 mm
W
355.1 mm
b
10 mm 30 mm
cp
l
k, ks
P
747.6 mm Hg
288.0 K 310.0 K
TS
1.25 K 7.5 K
DT
@e
@xx0;xb 200 m1 1500 m1
total
Total uncertainty
60.3 mm
63.2 mm
60.1 mm
60.8%
60.5%
61%
60.2 mm Hg
60.35 K
60.10 K
610.2%
4
Fig. 3 Boundary conditions and computational domain
Numerical Solution
Experimental Results
Fig. 4 Comparison of dimensionless velocity profiles at various temperature ratios for fully developed flow at y/L 5 0.5 and
Ra(b/L) 5 0.5 obtained from the numerical model and the analytical solution by Aung [1]
Ra(b/L)
24.8
128
(Nu)EXP
0.82
1.93
Numerical
solution
Raithby and
Hollands [5]
Numerical Results
RT 0:75; 0:5;
Table 3 Comparison of the overall channel average Nusselt numbers from the experiment and numerical predictions for RT 5 20.5
and 20.75
RT 0.5
RT 0.75
Aspect Ratio Modified Rayleigh number Experimental data Numerical solution Modified Rayleigh number Experimental data Numerical solution
A
26.4
17.6
13.2
Ra(b/L)
12.3
66.6
214
(Nu)EXP
0.67
2.19
3.51
(Nu)LAM Difference
0.70
3.6%
2.27
3.7%
3.53
0.6%
Ra(b/L)
4.7
22.9
76.6
(Nu)EXP
0.68
2.17
3.62
(Nu)LAM Difference
0.66
3.2%
2.27
4.6%
3.85
6.4%
Table 4 Comparison of the laminar and turbulent numerical models with the experimental data at aspect ratios of 13.2 and 8.8 for
RT 520.5 and 20.75
Temperature ratio
RT
0.75
0.5
0.5
Aspect ratio
Experimental data
A
13.2
13.2
8.8
Ra(b/L)
76.6
214
1084
(Nu)EXP
3.62
3.51
5.42
(Nu)LAM
3.85
3.53
4.31
Difference
6.4%
0.6%
20.5%
(Nu)TUR
3.66
3.48
5.69
Difference
1.1%
0.9%
5.0%
Semi-Empirical Correlation
A semi-empirical correlation was developed using the experimental Nusselt number data and applying the correlation method
of Churchill and Usagi [30]. A new correlation was developed
because the existing correlations in the literature were unable to
accurately predict the heat transfer of the negative temperature ratio cases. It can be seen in Figs. 12 and 13 that the Nusselt number
approaches asymptotes at low and high modified Rayleigh numbers. As discussed Sec. 5, at low modified Rayleigh numbers the
data follows the fully developed flow Nusselt number asymptote
that was developed by Aung [1]. This asymptote is given in Eq.
(6). At high modified Rayleigh numbers, the Nusselt number follows the vertical isothermal flat plate asymptote. An expression
for the vertical isothermal flat plate Nusselt number asymptote
was determined to be
NuIP C
2
1 RT
n1
1 jRT jn RT Rab=Ln
(17)
This expression was obtained by combining the standard expression for the average Nusselt number for free convection from two
vertical isothermal plates into an overall Nusselt number for the
channel (see Appendix). These two asymptotes are then used with
the correlation method of Churchill and Usagi [30] as follows:
Nu
Nufd
m
NuIP m
(18)
G
I
Iavg
k
ks
L
Nu
Nufd
NuIP
Nuy
P
Pr
q
qy
R
Ra(b/L)
RT
T
DT
W
u, v
V
x, y
x1
Greek Symbols
b
e
k0
l
q
/
Subscripts
7
Conclusions
Free convective heat transfer rates in an asymmetrically, isothermally heated vertical channel with opposing buoyancy forces were
determined using laser interferometry. Some flow visualization was
also conducted to determine the streamlines inside the channel. As
the temperature ratio was decreased, the opposing buoyancy forces
caused the flow to become unstable at lower modified Rayleigh
numbers. Both steady and turbulent numerical models were developed to obtain solutions for a wide range of modified Rayleigh
numbers at various temperature ratios. The opposing buoyancy
forces produced instability inside the channel and in general, a k-e
turbulence model with enhanced wall functions showed good
agreement for this type of flow at higher modified Rayleigh numbers. A correlation for the overall channel average Nusselt number
has been obtained based on the asymptotic behavior at high and
low values of modified Rayleigh number.
C
H
s
1
Appendix
An isolated flat plate asymptote was developed for use in the
semi-empirical correlation at high Rayleigh numbers. If the channel
is comprised of two isolated flat plates, the heat flux of each plate is
qH hH TH T1 and qC hC TC T1
(A1)
Acknowledgment
This work was funded in part by the Canadian Solar Buildings
Research Network under the Strategic Network Grants Program
of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada.
cold wall
hot wall
surface
ambient
hH L
hC L
CRanL;jTH T1 j and NuC
CRanL;jTC T1 j
k
k
(A2)
Nu
Nomenclature
A
B
b
D
F
g
aspect ratio
channel inlet and outlet domain size, m
channel spacing, m
amplitude of spatial fringe intensity
rate of change of phase shift, m1
gravity, m/s2
The Rayleigh numbers need to be converted to the common characteristic temperature difference, DT:
TH T1
DT
n
jT C T 1 j
DT
n
(A4)
This Rayleigh number can then be converted to the modified Rayleigh number based on the characteristic length, b:
RanL;DT Ranb;DT
n 4n
b
L
L
b
(A5)
(A6)
where
n1
n1
TH T1 n1
2TH T1
2
1 RT
TH T1 TC T1
DT
and
n
2jTC T1 j
jTC T1 j n TC T1
TH T1 TC T1
DT
DT
n1
2TC T1
2
jRT jn RT
(A7)
1 RT
TH T1 TC T1
2
1 RT
n1
1 jRT jn RT Rab=Ln
(A8)
It was determined that the effect of aspect ratio on the upper asymptote is small (since n 0.25, (A)4n1 1), so the term (A)4n1
can be neglected. Therefore the upper asymptote becomes
NuIP C
2
1 RT
n1
1 jRT jn RT Rab=Ln
(17)
References
[1] Aung, W., 1972, Fully Developed Laminar Free Convection Between Vertical
Plates Heated Asymmetrically, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(8), pp.
15771580.
[2] Elenbaas, W., 1942, Heat Dissipation of Parallel Plates by Free Convection,
Physica, 9, pp. 128.
[3] Aung, W., Fletcher, L. S., and Sernas, V., 1972, Developing Laminar Free
Convection Between Vertical Flat Plates With Asymmetric Heating, Int.
J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15(11), pp. 22932308.
[4] Bar-Cohen, A., and Rohsenow, W. M., 1984, Thermally Optimum Spacing of
Vertical, Natural Convection Cooled, Parallel Plates, ASME J. Heat Transfer,
106(1), pp. 116123.
[5] Raithby, G. D., and Hollands, K. G. T., 1998, Natural Convection, Handbook
of Heat Transfer, Rohsenow, W. M., Harnett, J. P., and Cho, Y. I., eds.,
McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 4.324.35.
[6] Bodoia, J. R., and Osterle, J. F., 1963, The Development of Free Convection
Between Heated Vertical Plates, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 84(1), pp. 4044.
[7] Burch, T., Rhodes, T., and Acharya, S., 1985, Laminar Natural Convection
Between Finitely Conducting Vertical Plates, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
28(6), pp. 11731186.
[8] Naylor, D., Floryan, J. M., and Tarasuk, J. D., 1991, Numerical Study of
Developing Free Convection Between Isothermal Vertical Plates, ASME
J. Heat Transfer, 113(3), pp. 620626.
[9] Kazeminejad, H., 2005, Laminar Free Convection in a Vertical Channel With
Asymmetrical Heating, Proceedings of the ASME Summer Heat Transfer
Conference, San Francisco, CA, Vol. 3, pp. 521530.
[10] Roeleveld, D., Naylor, D., and Oosthuizen, P. H., 2009, Empirical Correlations
for Free Convection in an Isothermal Asymmetrically Heated Vertical
Channel, Heat Transfer Eng., 30(3), pp. 189196.
[11] Habib, H. A., Said, S. A. M., Ahmed, S. A., and Asghar, A., 2002, Velocity
Characteristics of Turbulent Natural Convection in Symmetrically and Asymmetrically Heated Vertical Channels, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 26(1), pp.
7787.
[12] Ayinde, T. F., Said, S. A. M., and Habib, M. A., 2008, Turbulent Natural Convection Flow in a Vertical Channel With Anti-Symmetric Heating, Heat Mass
Transfer, 44(10), pp. 12071216.
[13] Roeleveld, D., Naylor, D., and Leong, W. H., 2014, Free Convection in Antisymmetrically Heated Vertical Channels, J. Heat Transfer, 136(1), p. 012502.
[14] ANSYS, Inc., 2010, ANSYS FLUENT (Version 13.0).
[15] Goldstein, R. J., 1976, Optical Temperature Measurement, Measurement
Techniques in Heat Transfer, E. R. G. Eckert and R. J. Goldstein, eds., Technivision Services, Slough, UK, pp. 177228.
[16] Poulad, M. E., Naylor, D., and Oosthuizen, P. H., 2011, Measurement of
Time-Averaged Turbulent Free Convection in a Tall Enclosure Using Interferometry, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 133(4), p. 042501.
[17] The Mathworks, Inc., 2010, MATLAB (Version R2010a), Natick, MA.
[18] Slepicka, S. S., and Cha, S. S., 1995, Stabilized Nonlinear Regression for
Interferogram Analysis, Appl. Opt., 34(23), pp. 50395044.
[19] Kline, S. J., and McClintock, F. A., 1953, Describing Uncertainties in SingleSample Experiments, Mech. Eng., 75(1), pp. 38.
[20] Touloukian, Y. S., Liley, P. E., and Saxena, S. C., 1970, Thermal Conductivity: Nonmetallic Liquids and Gases, Thermophysical Properties of Matter,
Vol. 3, Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.
[21] Touloukian, Y. S., and Makita, T., 1970, Specific Heat: Nonmetallic Liquids
and Gases, Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 6, Plenum Publishing
Corporation, New York.
[22] Touloukian, Y. S., Saxena, S. C., and Hestermans, P., 1975, Viscosity: Nonmetallic Liquids and Gases, Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 11,
Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York.
[23] Roeleveld, D., 2013, Experimental and Numerical Study of Free Convection
in a Vertical Channel With Opposing Buoyancy Forces, Ph.D. thesis, Ryerson
University, Toronto, Ontario.
[24] Walsh, P. C., and Leong, W. H., 2004, Effectiveness of Several Turbulence
Models in Natural Convection, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 14(5),
pp. 633648.
[25] Versteeg, H. K., and Malalasekera, W., 1995, An Introduction to Computational
Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Longman Group Ltd., Essex, UK.
[26] Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere
Publishing Corporation, New York.
[27] Van Doormaal, J. P., and Raithby, G. D., 1984, Enhancements of the SIMPLE
Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows, Numer. Heat Transfer,
7(2), pp. 147163.
[28] Celik, I. B., Ghia, U., Roache, P. J., Freitas, C. J., Coleman, H., and Raad, P. E.,
2008, Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications, ASME J. Fluids Eng. 130(7), p. 078001.
[29] Sparrow, E. M., Chrysler, G. M., and Azevedo, L. F., 1984, Observed Flow
Reversals and Measured-Predicted Nusselt Numbers for Natural Convection in
an One-Sided Heated Vertical Channel, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 106(2), pp.
325332.
[30] Churchill, S. W., and Usagi, R., 1972, A General Expression for the Correlation of Rates of Transfer and Other Phenomena, AIChE J., 18(6), pp.
11211128.