Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
VIBRATION ANALYSIS
OF LARGE YACHT STRUCTURES
D. Bootea, T. Paisb
a
S. McCartan
Coventry University, EBDIG-IRC, Coventry (United Kingdom)
SOMMAIRE
Le confort bord des grands yachts moteur fait l'objet d'une attention particulire de la part des plus
grandes Socits de Classification qui ont publi de nouvelles rgles et rglements pour l'valuation
des niveaux sonores et de vibrations. Ces rgles, gnralement dsignes comme Rgles de Classe
Confort", contiennent les critres gnraux des mesures de bruit et de vibration dans diffrentes zones
dun yacht, et des valeurs limites maximales auxquelles ces mesures doivent se conformer. Afin
d'amliorer le niveau de confort bord des superyachts l'Universit de Gnes, en collaboration avec
l'un des chantiers navals italiens les plus importants, a dcid de lancer une enqute approfondie sur le
comportement dynamique des structures des superyachts. La premire phase de cette activit a t de
faire une revue complte des rgles et rglements de confort dits par les plus importantes Socits de
Classification, une synthse est prsente dans ce travail. Dans la deuxime phase, un maillage par
lments finis dtaille d'un superyacht de 60 mtres a t ralis afin d'tudier les frquences
naturelles du pont principal en acier et de la superstructure, en alliage lger. Les rsultats numriques
ont t compars avec une premire srie de donnes exprimentales recueillies au cours de la
construction de navire.
SUMMARY
The comfort on board large motoryachts has become a key area of concern for the majority
Classification Societies, resulting in new rules and regulations for the evaluation of noise and vibration
maximum levels. These rules, called "Comfort Class Rules", contain the general criteria for noise and
vibration measurements in various yacht areas, and maximum limit values. In order to improve the
comfort level on board superyachts the University of Genova, in cooperation with one of the most
important Italian shipyards, decided to start a comprehensive investigation on the dynamic behaviour
of superyacht structures. The first phase of this activity is presented, a review of existing comfort rules
of the Classification Societies. In the second phase a detailed FEM analysis of a 60m superyacht has
been carried out in order to investigate the natural frequencies of the main steel deck and the
superstructure light alloy decks. The numerical results have been compared with experimental data
gathered during the vessel construction.
ATMA 2014
1. INTRODUCTION
Yacht designers and builders are continuously
looking for new solutions to reduce
construction costs and to improve the quality
and innovation of their vessels. In the case of
superyachts, over 30 meters in length, hull
performance is not a primary objective. The
design team focus on aspects related more to
the aesthetic impact of the vessel and the
onboard comfort. From this point of view,
vibrations and noise represent the most
difficult issues for designers to deal with, both
in the initial phase of the project, when it is
necessary to have preliminary information
about the response of the structure not yet
defined, and during construction, in case some
critical behaviours arise in any part of the
structure.
2. COMFORT RULES
The problem of vibration and noise on board
large yachts falls within comfort characteristics
required by owner specifications and suggested
by Classification Society Rules. This subject
was initially regulated by ISO 6954, 1984
edition and then by the new, more restrictive
ISO 2000 Standards [1]. Recently, most
Classification Societies assumed new Comfort
Class Rules based on maximum levels of
vibration and noise.
As an example, Baker and McSweeney [2],
present a complete analysis of present ABS
Rules concerning vibrations and noise
published in the 'Guide for the Class Notation
Comfort - Yacht' [3]. Two notational options
are considered: COMF(Y), which establishes a
level of comfort based on ambient noise and
vibration alone and COMF(Y+) which adds a
slightly more demanding criteria for noise and
vibration, and provides additional criteria for
the assessment of motion sickness. Some
aspects of the ABS Yacht Comfort guide, have
been recently revised.
ATMA 2014
Some examples of maximum allowable levels
for vibration are shown in Table 1 for
American Bureau of Ships, Bureau Veritas,
Lloyd's Register and RINA. For what ABS is
concerned a synthesis of COM(Y) and
COMF(Y+) rules is presented for yachts larger
than 45 meters in length. The vibration
parameter is the spectral peak of structural
velocity in mm/s.
Table 1. Maximum whole-body vibration
according to American Bureau of Ships,
Bureau Veritas, Lloyd's Register and RINA
Comfort Rules for yachts.
Location
CS
BV
BV
LR
LR
RINA
Open decks
Hz
1 - 80
1 - 80
1.25 - 2.0
1.25 - 2.0
1 - 80
1 - 80
1 - 80
1.0 - 1.5
1.0 - 1.5
1.0 - 1.5
1 - 80
1 - 80
1 - 80
1.0 - 3.0
1.0 - 3.0
1.0 - 3.0
1 - 80
1 - 80
1 - 80
1.8- 2.5
1.8 - 2.5
1.8 - 2.5
0 - 100
0 - 100
0 - 100
1.0 - 3.0
1.0 - 3.0
1.0 - 3.0
1 - 80
ABS (Y+)
ABS
Public
spaces
lounge
ABS (Y)
ABS
Cabins
and
Hz
[mm/s]
Hz
[mm/s]
Hz
[mm/s]
Hz
RINA [mm/s]
ATMA 2014
remain below the cruise speed BPF. Even in
this case a detailed FEM analysis is the only
way to identify critical areas and to look for
possible solutions in advance.
3. FEM MODELLING
For this study a three-deck superyacht, 60m in
length, under construction in a Italian shipyard,
has been used as case study. The ship has a
steel hull and aluminium superstructure,
longitudinally framed with web frame interval
of 1200 mm. In order to perform accurate and
reliable FEM calculations a detailed numerical
model of the yacht structures has been
developed using the multi-purpose code
ANSYS version 13.0 (Swanson Analysis
System Inc., [10]).
The mesh was created using "SHELL63"
elements of the ANSYS library for plating and
main reinforcements such as keelsons, floors
and girders. For secondary stiffeners, such as
longitudinals, simple "BEAM44" elements
have been selected to keep the model
dimension as low as possible. The mass and
Figure 2: Assembly
prefabrication blocks.
scheme
of
hull
ATMA 2014
Figure 5: Geometry of the stern part of the
vessel.
ATMA 2014
Figure 8: View of the left hand side of the
complete model.
with different
ATMA 2014
to behave as a cantilever (see fig. 13).
Constraints are located far enough from the
area of interest; as a consequence the
constraint effect on the results of the analysis
can be assumed to be insignificant. The same
solution has been assumed for single deck
models; in figures 14 and 15, as an example,
the upper and sun deck constraint schemes are
shown.
4. MODAL ANALYSIS
The first calculations has been carried out on
the complete model. The natural frequencies of
the whole structure have been determined by
modal analysis; the Lanczos mode extraction
method (LANB approach in ANSYS code) has
been employed. This solver is particularly
suitable for large models consisting of shells or
a combination of shells and solids.
The first analysis was been performed on the
hull first natural frequency, the results were
found to be in accordance with the typical
natural frequency of similar yachts built by the
same shipyard. In terms of local vibrations, as
expected the most significant vibration modes
have been individuated on the main deck and
on the superstructure decks. The results
obtained by FEM calculations were compared
with those measured on the same vessel during
construction phases. In Table 2 the most
significant natural frequencies, calculated on
the two models "A" and "B" and measured on
the
real
structure
(assembled
and
corresponding to the "B" model), are reported.
The displacement plot of the first natural
frequencies of the three decks ("B" model) are
shown in figures 16, 17 and 18. These plots are
useful to individuate other local modes taking
place at the same frequency. As it is possible
to see, while the main and sun deck modes are
quite isolate, the upper deck mode frequency
identifies a number of other minor local
vibrations. As one of the aims of this
investigation is to propose resolutive remedies,
a situation such as that of fig. 17 significantly
complicates the designers work.
ATMA 2014
Item
Calculated
Hz
"C"
"D"
24.8
13.2
25.5
12.3
16.2
8.6
Measured
Hz
13.5
11.5
11.3
Calculated
Hz
"A"
"B"
24.5
12.9
25.0
12.6
14.6
7.6
Measured
Hz
13.5
11.5
11.3
ATMA 2014
and without outfitting ("E", "F", "G", "H", "I"
and "L" numerical models). The results are
shown in Table 4. As previously done, the
displacement plots of the considered models
("F", "H" and "L" models with outfitting) are
shown as well (figures 22, 23 and 24).
"F"
"G"
"H"
"I"
"L"
24.1
12.8
24.4
12.3
17.0
9.0
"E"
Main deck
("n.o.")
Main deck
("w.o.")
Upper deck
("n.o.")
Upper deck
("w.o.")
Sun deck
("n.o.")
Sun deck
("w.o.")
Calculated [Hz]
Single Measure
Global Stern
[Hz]
deck
model model
model
24.5
24.8
24.1
12.9
13.2
12.8
13.5
25.0
25.5
25.4
12.6
12.3
12.3
11.5
14.6
16.2
17.0
7.6
8.6
9.0
11.3
5. CONCLUSIONS
The study presented in this paper is the first
part of a research program aimed at thoroughly
analysing the structural problems of modern
motor yachts. In this phase attention has been
focused on those aspects having a direct
impact on the comfort characteristics of the
ATMA 2014
vessel. At first a complete overview of recent
rules issued by ISO and Classification
Societies has been carried out in order to
highlight the most important parameters to be
considered. Then attention has been focused on
hull vibrations, at local level.
6. AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to aknowledge Mr. Ciro
Busiello for his cooperation with this
research, carried out within his master
thesis.
7. REFERENCES