Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
is required for the prediction of fatigue life. Depending on how stress
distribution is done, fatigue can be predicted using one of the three
approaches i.e. simplified approach, spectral approach or deterministic
approach.
INTRODUCTION
Stochastic nature of the ocean environment is the main source of the
fatigue demand for welded structural elements. Fatigue failure if not
considered at design stage can produce precarious consequences on the
floating structure. High tensile steel is extensively used in ship building
to improve strength to weight ratio. But, usage of high tensile steel has
not really enhanced the fatigue strength because of increase in hull
stress level. Fatigue strength estimation broadly can be classified into
two categories: (Xiang-chun Guo-qing and Hui-long, 2006) cumulative
fatigue damage based on S-N curve and fracture mechanics method
based on crack propagation. In cumulative fatigue damage assessment
using probabilistic approach, an appropriate stress distribution function
936
was done by Wang, Y. (2010). The author has implemented the spectral
fatigue analysis to predict the fatigue life at connection of main deck
longitudinal to a transverse web at the midship section of dredger
barge. In his analysis, he considered the cyclic stresses due to vertical
and horizontal bending moment and finally compares with IACS R56.
n = T . pi . f 0ij
f 0ij =
i =1
(2)
mean life to failure at stress range Si by utilizing the equation (Eq. 1).
Based on assumption that the fatigue damage linearly accumulative, the
cumulative fatigue damage due to stochastic load process can be
calculated with Palmgren-Miner model (Fols, R.,1998).
{ }
n
n
m
E ( s ) = s m f S ( s ) .ds
C
C 0
(3)
(7)
D=
(6)
(1)
ni
N i ( Si )
m0ij
T
m
D = (2 2) m + 1 f 0ij pi ( ij ) m
C
2
m2ij
Finally, the equation for a single sea state and heading is given as
(Wang, 2010)
C
N= m
S
1
2
(5)
(4)
( m, ij ) = a ( m ) + [1 a ( m )][1 ij ]b ( m )
937
(8)
Where,
a ( m ) = 0.926 0.033m, b ( m ) = 1.587 m 2.323
ij = 1
m22ij
(9)
m0ij m4 ij
ij =
m02ij
4
1 2 4
H S2 2 5
4
S ( ) =
Exp
4 TZ
TZ
(10)
Rices Formulation
The short term damage incurred in the i-th sea-state in j-th direction, for
bi-linear S-N curves where the negative slope changes at point Q = (NQ,
SQ) from m to r = m + m (m > 0) and the constant C changes to C,
the expression (ABS Guideline note, 2004 ) is given as follows
Based on the rice distribution term as Rician distribution the wide band
correction factor was given by Kim, Wang and Shin (2007) as
m +1
m +1
1 2
1+
2
1 2 ) 2
( m, ) =
+ 1 +
(
2
m
2
+ 1
T
m M D
D = (2 2) m + 1 (m,ij ) ij f 0ij pi ( ij ) m
C
2
i =1 j =1
(11)
= 12
in the sea state and i is the endurance factor having its value between 0
and 1 and measuring the contribution of the lower branch of the S-N
curve to the damage. It is defined as
(12)
i = 1
p(S ) =
D1
e
Q
Z2
D2 Z 2 R 2
e + D3 Ze
R2
Z 2
2
m1
m0
( m / 2 + 1)
0 ( r / 2 + 1, i )
(16)
(13)
2 ( m0 ) 2
While deriving the above equation for the fatigue damage in specific
sea state the stress range is normally expressed in terms of probability
density functions for different short-term intervals corresponding to the
individual cells of the wave scatter diagram. Linear addition of short
term damages sustained over all the sea states gives the total damage
for the structure element. Total fatigue damage accumulated over
operational service life (T) can be estimated by accounting for all sea
states encountered with the different wave directions and all possible
load cases.
m2
S
, = 1 2 , Z =
1
m4
2 ( m0 ) 2
D2 + D3
2 m + 1 2
m / 2
0 ( a, x) = u a 1 exp ( u ) du
1.25( D3 D2 R )
m D12
,R=
D1
1 D1 + D12
m =
0 ( m / 2 + 1, i ) (1/ i )
SQ
Where, i =
2 2
ij
Where,
2( 2 )
1 D1 + D12
D1 =
,
D
=
, D3 = 1 D1 D2
2
1+ 2
1 R
Q=
(15)
Where, M and D denotes the total number of sea states and direction
respectively. ij = m0 ij is the standard deviation of the stress response
Z
Q
(14)
(14)
938
RAO , v =
z z0
RAOM ,Ver
I yy
(17)
RAO , h =
y
RAOM , Hor
I zz
(18)
Hydrodynamic Model
+
Load distribution
Where, z = Vertical distance of the structural part from the base line in
meters. y=Horizontal distance of the structural part from the centre line
in meters. z0=Distance of the neutral axis from the Base line. Iyy, Ixx =
Midship section modulus with respect to neutral axis and the centre line
axis of the vessel respectively in m4. The combined transfer function
can be derived as
(19)
Where v and h denotes phase of the stress process due to vertical and
horizontal hull girder bending respectively. Stress transfer function can
be obtained
H ( | ) = RAO ,t
(21)
mn = n S ( | H s , Tz , ) d
0
(22)
Where, = p V p 2 cos / g
Where, p represents the regular frequency and V is the vessel speed.
For confused short-crested sea directional spreading conditions must be
apply. Confused short-crested seas result in a kinetic energy spread,
which is modeled using the cosine-squared approach, (2/) cos2.
Generally, cosine-squared spreading is assumed from +90 to 90
degrees on either side of the selected wave heading. Applying the
wave spreading function modifies the spectral moment as follows:
' = + 90
mn = '
= 90
2 2 ' n
cos . S ( | H s , Tz , ) d
Spectral Analysis
(20)
(23)
METHODOLOGY
Table 1. Principle particulars of analyzed transportation barge
In this paper, spectral fatigue analysis is discussed for the deck
longitudinal stiffener of a transportation barge. Procedure for the
spectral analysis is shown in Fig. 1. Spectral analysis can be performed
by using the following steps:
Principal dimensions
Length overall
Breadth
Depth
Sectional properties of midship section
Distance from baseline to Neutral axis, z0
Moment of Inertia, Ixx
Moment of Inertia, Iyy
Step-I identify all load cases and loading conditions, a vessel is going
to encounter during its operational life. Formulate load cases for
different and most probable load combination to obtain the load
distributions for the seakeeping analysis.
939
91.5 m.
27.46 m.
5.5 m.
2.9247 m.
4.5832 m4.
33.417 m4.
It has been observed that most of the time transportation barges are
carrying either jacket or topsides. Four load cases have been taken for
the fatigue strength assessment considering two loading conditions for
each of the type of loaded module as shown in table 2.
Table 2. Different load cases considered for the analysis
Load Conditions
LC1
LC2
LC3
LC4
Module
Top Sides
Top Sides
Jacket
Jacket
Draft
2.41 m.
3.30 m.
2.26 m.
3.30 m.
Displacement
5294 ton.
7450 ton.
4945 ton.
7436 ton.
Ton/m
175
RESULTS
Ideally, frequency domain hydrodynamic analysis tool should be used
for the seakeeping analysis, i.e. stress RAO computation in this case.
3D panel method based seakeeping programs are most suited for the
spectral fatigue analysis. Frequency domain tool like SWAN1 (RPM
based) imposes certain restrictions (SWAN1-User Manual, 2001) in
terms of combination of vessel speed, wave heading and frequency.
SWAN1 requires Froude number ( Fn = V / g.L ) in the range of
LC1
150
LC2
125
LC3
LC4
100
75
50
25
0
0
20
40
60
Length of Ship (m)
80
100
Fatigue Life =
940
Design Life
Damage Ratio
(24)
This analysis was done based on the assumption that during its service
life only these four loading conditions will be encounter by the barge
and each load case is experienced during one fourth of the barge
operational service life. If predicted fatigue life for the structure detail
due to different load cases are represented as L1, L2, L3 and L4, then
combined fatigue life is
LC = 1
P ( S > SR ) = 1
(25)
0.85 0.25 (1/ L1) + 0.25 (1/ L 2 ) + 0.25 (1/ L3) + 0.25 (1/ L 4 )
Table 3. Results for fatigue life obtained for the individual loading
condition as well as combined fatigue life considering long crested seas
(DR Damage ratio, Flife expected fatigue life)
Wirsching
Load
Cases
LC1
LC2
LC3
LC4
LC
DR
0.30
0.30
0.28
0.25
Flife
(years)
16.94
16.50
17.86
20.05
20.87
Rice
DR
0.32
0.32
0.30
0.27
Flife
(years)
15.83
15.42
16.70
18.78
19.51
k = S R / ( ln N R )
0.27
0.28
0.26
0.23
= 1.1 0.35
Flife
(years)
18.32
17.87
19.48
21.54
22.59
Wirsching
LC1
LC2
LC3
LC4
LC
DR
0.24
0.26
0.25
0.22
Flife
(years)
20.88
19.29
19.77
22.83
24.24
Rice
DR
0.26
0.28
0.27
0.24
Flife
(years)
19.33
17.86
18.35
21.20
22.48
Dirlink
DR
0.21
0.23
0.22
0.20
Flife
(years)
23.42
21.64
22.29
25.21
27.13
(28)
L 100
300
(29)
N km m
D = L + 1
(30)
The factor of 0.85 accounts for the non operative time of the barge such
as maintenance and load out operations at shore. Final results and
fatigue life using Wirching, Rice and Dirlik wideband rain flow
correction factors for long creasted and short crested seas are presented
in table 3 and table 4. With Wirching correction factor the fatigue life
for long creased and long creasted seas were estimated 20.87 years and
24.24 years respectively.
m + m
0 + 1, 0
+ 1,
=1
m
+ 1
(31)
S
Where, = Q ln N R
SR
Table 4. Results for fatigue life obtained for the individual loading
condition as well as combined fatigue life considering short crested
seas (DR Damage ratio, Flife expected fatigue life)
Load
Cases
Dirlink
DR
(27)
NR
Using F2 class bilinear S-N curve, the fatigue life for the selected
structural configuration was predicted as 19.86 years and 26.25 years
using long crested and short crested seas respectively.
(26)
CONCLUSIONS
Where, S is the stress range for the random loading process, Weibull
shape parameter and k is the characteristic value of the stress range.
This assumption enables the use of a closed form equation for
calculation of the fatigue life when the two parameters of the Weibull
distribution are determined. For the estimation of k, reference stress
941
structure as well. The present study was carried out considering the
global hull structural loads. In principal, consideration of loads for the
fatigue life demand of any structural element strongly depends on its
location. For the structure detail, the stress range has been estimated by
linear summation of the wave induced stress components.
Total four load cases have been considered for the analysis. It is
observed that load cases LC2 and LC4 having same draft (3.30m each)
and almost same displacement (7450t and 7436t) the damage ratio
(0.303 and 0.2494 using Wirschings correction factor and long crested
sea states) varies considerably. It is depicted that for the fatigue
analysis, vessel draft is not only the main fatigue strength influencing
parameter but the mass distribution is also one of the critical variable to
consider.
Analysis was performed using short crested and long crested sea waves
assuming that damage accumulated due to each short term sea state for
the scatter table. From results it has been observed that modeling of sea
state as long crested wave predicts the high damage as compare to
modeling the sea environment as short crested wave. The reason is
being the high unidirectional value of stress range for the long crested
wave as compare to spreading waves, representing the realistic sea
conditions. For detail fatigue analysis it is recommended to model short
crested sea state. However, this requires a high computational effort. At
initial phase of design, designers can use long crested sea state as quick
check for being on more conservative side.
Various wide band correction factors have been used based on the
spectral moment obtained from the spectral analysis. It has been found
that Dirlik correction predict high fatigue life as compare to Wirsching
and Rice correction factors. On the other hand, Rice wide band
correction gives relatively low fatigue life. The result obtain using
IACS R56 predicts a good agreement with the result calculated using
Rice correction for long crested sea and Dirlik for the short crested sea
environment.
REFERENCES
ABS Guidance notes (2004). spectral-based fatigue analysis for
vessels,American Bureau of Shipping.
Bendat, J.S. (1964). Probability functions for random responses
Technical report, NASA.
Cartwright and Higgins (1956). The statistical distribution of the
maxima of a random function,. Mathematical and physical sciences,
Vol 237, No.1209, pp 212232.
942