Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1, 2740
INTRODUCTION
Compacted bentonite is often used as the basic material for
constructing isolating barriers in geoenvironmental applications or as basal and cap liners for landfills/retention basins
(Koch, 2002). High-density compacted bentonite in the form
of blocks has also been proposed as sealing material in
high-level radioactive waste repositories, as it provides very
low permeability, high exchange capacity, sufficient thermal
conductivity, and adequate mechanical resistance. There is
27
0.2
Dry density
Incremental pore volume: ml/g
28
1.8 Mg/m3
0.16
Intra-aggregate
1.5 Mg/m3
Inter-aggregate
0.12
0.08
0.04
10
100
1000
Pore diameter: nm
10000
100 000
Intra-aggregate
void ratio
(e 0.47)
0.2
100
Suction: MPa
0.8
29
Intra-aggregate
governing suction
10
Inter-aggregate
governing suction
1
0.1
0.0
1000
100
10
1
0.1
Pore diameter: m
0.01
0.001
0.1
10
15
20
25
30
Water content: %
35
40
45
the fact that the density of the water tightly bound to the
clay particles is higher than that of free water (Martin, 1962,
Villar, 2002). It is also likely that part of the water is
retained on the surface of the aggregates. Summarising, all
the observational data concerning the fabric of compacted
soils indicate a clear presence of two structural levels in the
material: a microstructure inside the aggregates and a
macrostructure consisting of the ensemble of aggregates and
inter-aggregate pores. Microstructure features appear to be
largely independent of compaction effort.
The saturated permeability of the bentonite compacted to
a dry density of 17 Mg=m3 is of the order of 1014 m=s
(Villar & Lloret, 2001). As a consequence, testing times of
stages requiring water content changes and hydraulic equilibration are very long, usually taking several weeks. This
places important time constraints on the laboratory testing
programme.
30
Fig. 5, where the solution reservoirs placed above the specimen can be seen.
The swelling tests under constant volume have been
performed in the UPC laboratory. These tests aim to reproduce the conditions during hydration of an engineered
barrier in underground waste repositories where the compacted bentonite is rigidly constrained by the waste canister
and the host rock (Fig. 6). Samples were compacted at an
initial dry density of 1:63 0:01 Mg=m3 at hygroscopic
water content (13:7 1:3%). This density is somewhat lower
than in the specimens reported previously because there is
some capacity for the barrier to expand slightly initially
owing to the presence of gaps between the compacted blocks
of bentonite. Four swelling pressure tests have been performed.
A schematic layout of the oedometer used in this type of
test is presented in Fig. 7. To prevent the swelling of the soil
in the constant-volume stages, the lever arm is fixed
(Bjerrum et al., 1964); a load cell measures the development
of the swelling pressure. To permit the application of high
loads, the lever arm has a loading ratio of up to 1 : 20.
Suction is again applied by means of an atmosphere with
controlled relative humidity. In this oedometer cell the air is
circulated, by means of a peristaltic pump, through the
porous plates located at the two ends of the sample.
TEST RESULTS
Table 1 presents the initial conditions and the stress paths
of five tests in which a combination of loading paths at
constant suction and suction change paths at constant load
Nuclear waste
Container
Compacted
bentonite
Rock
31
Pump
Salt solution
Oedometric cell
Porous stones
Soil
Load cell
Loading ram
Fig. 7. Schematic layout of the high-suction oedometer used in the UPC laboratory
Table 1. Stress paths of the tests, in which a combination of loading paths at constant suction and suction change paths at constant
load were applied. Tests performed at CIEMAT laboratory
Test
Initial conditions
rd :
Mg=m3
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
172
168
169
171
172
Path
w: %
130
137
142
129
132
II
v :
MPa
s:
MPa
v :
MPa
s:
MPa
v :
MPa
01
01
01
01
01
138
126
121
119
138
01
550
01
01
01
14
37
520
51
91
90
84
01
1000
S1
S2
Suction: MPa
100
Vapour
equilibrium
S3
10
Axis
translation
S4
0.1
0.01
III
S5
0 .1
1
Vertical stress: MPa
10
IV
s:
MPa
460
127
14
41
0
v :
MPa
s:
MPa
v :
MPa
s:
MPa
51
91
90
84
50
0
0
0
0
0
01
01
01
01
001
0
0
0
0
0
32
1.1
Applied suction
during loading
1.0
1.1
p0
S5
S5
1.0
500 MPa
127 MPa
Void ratio
14 MPa
S4
4 MPa
0.8
0 MPa
S3
0.7
S2
0.6
5.1
9.0
0.9
Void ratio
0.9
0.8
9.1
Axis translation
technique
S4
0.7
S3
0.6
S2
Initial state
S1
S1
0.1
1.0
Vertical stress: MPa
0.5
0.1
10.0
1.0
10.0
Suction: MPa
100.0
1000.0
0.08
0.06
e/[In(s patm)]
Initial state
0.5
0.0
S1
S2
S4
S5
S3
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.1
1
Vertical stress: MPa
10
0.80
Vertical stress: 0.1 MPa
0.75
0.70
Void ratio
1000
S2
Suction: MPa
100
S4
0.65
0.60
S3
S5
0.55
10
S4
0.50
10
0.1
0.1
S5
1
10
Apparent preconsolidation stress: MPa
100
100
Suction: MPa
1000
1.0
S5
500 MPa
Void ratio
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
S1
Initial state
0.5
0.0
0.1
1.0
Vertical stress: MPa
(a)
10.0
1.1
Applied suction
during loading
1.0
4 MPa
14 MPa
127 MPa
Void ratio
0.9
S4
0.8
S3
0.7
S2
0.6
Initial state
0.5
0.0
0.1
1.0
Vertical stress: MPa
(b)
10.0
Fig. 14. Observed variation of void ratio with the same initial
and final stress states: (a) tests S1 and S5; (b) tests S2, S3 and
S4
33
34
Table 2. Main features of the swelling pressure tests performed at the UPC laboratory
Test
Initial conditions
rd :
Mg=m3
w: %
162
163
162
163
146
132
146
142
II
011
015
016
015
128
146
128
128
1000
SP1
SP2
100
d 1.65 Mg/m3
SP3
Zone I
d 1.63 Mg/m3
SP4
10
Zone II
d 1.57 Mg/m3
1
Zone III
d 1.50 Mg/m3
0.1
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Vertical stress: MPa
8.0
10.0
20
SP1
15
SP2
SP3
12
SP4
Soaking tests
424
016
015
70
39
165
163
157
150
4
0
1.20
S
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
Dry density: Mg/m3
1.70
1.80
LC
Microstructure
tio
ra
id
e
g
vo
ag
al
in
k
l
al
ur ic
el
rin
ct st
ur e
sw
ct as
ru la
sh
st p
ru e
al
al
st cr
ro tio
ur
ur
ro de
ct
ac ra
ct
ru
ac ic
M id ase
ru
st
M ast
st
vo cre
ro
ro
pl
ic
ic
in
M
M
Elastic
domain
Macrostructure
Suction: MPa
Yield points in
swelling
stress tests
011
SI
NL
SD
Fig. 17. Graphical summary of the double-structure elastoplastic model for expansive soils
Compression
accumulates
upon cycles
fD
ase
ncre
on i
dM/dm
ti
Suc
Equilibrium state
for a large number
of cycles
p/p0
0
Suc
ti
on d
fI
Macroporosity
develops as a
result of drying
ecre
ase
Micropores
invade
macropores
stress path dependence, and the parameters for the microstructural behaviour have been derived from the swelling
stages of tests S1 and S5. Finally, the parameters controlling
the shape of the LC yield surface have been evaluated from
the experimental results plotted in Fig. 10, which shows the
variation of the apparent preconsolidation stress with suction.
The initial values of the microstructural and macrostructural void ratio are 045 and 011 respectively, in accordance
with the observations on the soil fabric. The static compaction stress (18 MPa) gives the initial position of the LC yield
surface. With the expression used to define the LC curve
(equation (1)), the hardening parameter p0 has an initial
value of 12 MPa.
The model is first applied to the analysis of tests S1 and
S5. They share the same initial and final generalised stress
states but their trajectories are very different (Fig. 19(a)). In
test S1 the specimen is loaded under a high (550 MPa)
suction up to a 51 MPa vertical load and is then wetted,
reducing the suction to zero in stages. In contrast, test S5 is
first wetted at a low applied vertical stress value of 01 MPa
and then the sample, already saturated, is loaded to a vertical
stress of 50 MPa. These two tests therefore provide the
opportunity to examine the behaviour over a wide range of
stress paths. Fig. 19(a) shows the computed variation of void
ratio over the stress paths followed by the two tests, together
with the experimental results. Major features of behaviour
are correctly reproduced, including the following:
(a) There are large swelling strains when the material is
wetted at low stresses (path BD, test S5).
(b) There are smaller, but still significant, swelling strains
when the soil is wetted under a 5 MPa vertical stress
(path CE, test S1).
(c) The slope of the compression line changes during
loading, indicating yield, in test S5 (path DE). No
yield is apparent during the loading at high suction of
specimen S1 (path BC).
(d) The final void ratio (point E) is different in the two
samples. There is a measure of stress path dependence,
at least in relation to volumetric strains
Good reproduction of behaviour is also achieved when
considering the experimental results in terms of void ratio
against suction variation (Fig. 19(b)), although some departures are observed at intermediate stages of the swelling of
test S5.
To summarise, the model is capable of offering a good
simulation of the observed results, and, with the set of
parameters adopted, even the quantitative agreement is quite
close. Accepting then that the constitutive law is a reasonable representation of the real behaviour, it is interesting to
explore the further information that can be obtained from
0005
0080
090
ks
pc
35
0001
050 MPa
10
2:3 3 103 MPa1
36
100
C
S1
Suction: MPa
Suction: MPa
1000
10
1
0.1
S5
D
0
2
3
Vertical stress: MPa
1000
100
2
3
Vertical stress: MPa
E
4
1.1
D
D
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
Void ratio
Void ratio
S5
D
0
1.1
S1 test
0.8
S1 model
S5 test
S5 model
0.7
0.6
Initial state
0.5
S1
10
0.1
0.1
1.0
Vertical stress: MPa
(a)
S1 model
S5 test
S5 model
0.8
E
0.7
Initial state
0.6
A
B
S1 test
C
10.0
B
C
0.5
0.1
1.0
10.0
Suction: MPa
(b)
100.0
1000.0
Fig. 19. Computed variation of void ratio for tests S1 and S5: (a) variation over stress paths; (b) constant load, varied
suction. Experimental results are provided for comparison.
100
Suction: MPa
1000
10
1
S5
0.1
0
2
3
4
Vertical stress: MPa
E
5
0.7
0.6
D
E
0.5
Void ratio
B
A
Initial state
0.4
0.3
0.2
E
0.1
0.1
A
Initial state
100.0
B
1000.0
Fig. 20. Evolution of computed microstructural and macrostructural void ratio. Test S5
Suction: MPa
100
10
1
0.1
S5
D
0
1000
Suction: MPa
1000
100
C
S1
10
1
2
3
4
Vertical stress: MPa
37
0.1
S5
D
0
2
3
Vertical stress: MPa
E
4
1000.0
B
2.0
fI
E
A
100.0
Suction: MPa
1.5
fI
fD
S5
1.0
0.5
Initial state
S1
S5
10.0
1.0
B
A
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.1
fD
0.8
1.0
p/p0
E
2
E
6
8
p0*: MPa
10
12
14
1000
Suction: MPa
Suction: MPa
1000
100
10
100
S1
10
1
1
0.1
S5
D
0
0.1
2
3
4
Vertical stress: MPa
E
0
2
3
4
Vertical stress: MPa
0.60
1000.0
E
B
100.0
Initial state
0.50
Initial state
Void ratio
Suction: MPa
0.40
p
p0
10.0
LC in loading
yield point
1.0
0.30
0.20
Final LC
Initial LC
Initial state
A
0.10
0.1
D
0.0
E
4.0
B
C
8.0
12.0
p, p0: MPa
16.0
20.0
0.1
B
C
1.0
10.0
Suction: MPa
100.0
1000.0
Fig. 22. Stress path and successive LC yield surfaces for test S5
Fig. 24. Evolution of computed microstructural and microstructural void ratio. Test S1
38
B
1000
Suction: MPa
100
C
S1
10
1
0.1
E
0
2
3
Vertical stress: MPa
2.0
fI
C
1.5
fI
fD
S1
1.0
0.5
B
0.0
A
E
0.5
0.0
0.2
fD
0.4
0.6
0 .8
1.0
p/p0
Suction: MPa
1000
100
S1
10
1
1.0
1000.0
100.0
Suction: MPa
E
0
2
3
4
Vertical stress: MPa
C
Initial
LC
A
Initial state
Final
LC
CONCLUSIONS
The mechanical behaviour of compacted bentonite has
been investigated by the performance of a testing programme carried out in suction-controlled oedometers capable
of applying high suctions and large vertical loads. Two types
of test have been performed: (a) tests with simultaneous
control of vertical stress and suction, and (b) suction-controlled swelling pressure tests. Examination of the results
has revealed significant features of behaviour, such as yield
phenomena, dependence of swelling strains on applied stresses, stress path dependence of strains, and compound stress
paths in swelling pressure tests. In spite of the complexity of
the behaviour, a good understanding of the behaviour is
possible by considering explicitly the fabric of the soil,
which has been independently studied, revealing a dual
arrangement with microstructural and macrostructural components.
1000.0
Model predictions
10.0
Tests
SP1
SP2
SP3
SP4
100.0
0.1
0.1
1.0
p: MPa
10.0
100.0
Suction: MPa
1.0
10.0
1.0
0.1
0
4
6
Vertical stress: MPa
Fig. 27. Computed stress paths for swelling pressure tests SP1
SP4. Experimental results provided for comparison
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by ENRESA and the
European Commission through contract FI4W-CT95006
(FEBEX I). The authors also wish to acknowledge the
support of the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologa through
research grant BTE20012227.
APPENDIX 1
The relevant equations for the elasto-plastic model are as follows.
LC yield surface:
!0sk
k
p0
p0 pc
and (s) (0)[r (1 r)es ]
pc
Hardening law:
d p0
(1 eM )dv
(0) k
p
(1)
(2)
d p ds
(1 eM ) p
and
with K t
K t Ks
k
(1 eM )(s patm )
ks
(3)
d( p s)
em ( ps)
with K m
Km
m
(4)
Interaction micromacro:
dpvM f D devm when SD is activated
(5)
(6)
NOTATION
e void ratio
eM macrostructural level void ratio
f I , f D interaction function between micro and
macrostructural levels for suction increase and
decrease respectively
K m microstructural bulk modulus for changes in
suction plus mean stress
K s macrostructural bulk modulus for changes in
suction
K t macrostructural bulk modulus for changes in mean
stress
p net mean stress (excess of mean stress over gas
pressure)
pc reference stress
p0 net mean yield stress at current suction
p90 net mean yield stress for saturated conditions
patm atmospheric pressure (01 MPa)
r parameter defining the maximum macrostructural
soil stiffness
s suction
w gravimetric water content
39
REFERENCES
Al-Mukhtar, M., Qi, Y., Alcover, J. F. & Bergaya, F. (1999).
Oedometric and water-retention behavior of highly compacted
unsaturated smectites. Can. Geotech. J. 36, 675684.
Alonso, E. E. (1998). Modelling expansive soil behaviour: keynote
lecture. Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. Unsaturated Soils, Beijing 2,
3770.
Alonso, E. E., Gens, A. & Hight, D. W. (1987). Special problem
soils: general report. Proc. 9th Eur. Conf. Soil Mech. Found.
Engng 3, 19871146.
Alonso, E. E., Gens, A. & Josa, A. (1990). A constitutive model
for partially saturated soils. Geotechnique 40, No. 3, 405430.
Alonso, E. E., Vaunat, J. & Gens, A. (1999). Modelling the mechanical behaviour of expansive clays. Engng Geol. 54, 173183.
Atabek, R. B. , Felix, B., Robinet, J. C. & Lahlou, R. (1991).
Rheological behaviour of saturated expansive clay materials.
Workshop on Stress Partitioning in Engineered Clay Barriers,
Duke University, Durham, NC.
Bernier, F., Volckaert, G., Alonso, E. & Villar, M. (1997). Suctioncontrolled experiments on Boom clay. Engng Geol. 47, 325
338.
Bjerrum, L., Brekke, T. L., Moum, J. & Selmer-Olsen, R. (1964).
Some Norwegian studies and experiences with swelling materials in rock gauges. NGI Publication, Oslo, No. 57.
Brackley, I. J. (1973). Swell pressure and free swell in compacted
clay. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Expansive Soils, Haifa 1, 169176.
Callaghan, I. C. & Ottewill, R. H. (1974). Interparticle forces
in montmorillonite gels. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 57,
110118.
Cui, Y. J., Loiseau, C. & Delage, P. (2002a). Microstructure changes
of a confined swelling soil due to suction controlled hydration.
Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Unsaturated Soils, Recife 2, 593598.
Cui, Y. J., Yahia-Aissa, M. & Dalage, P. (2002b). A model for the
volume change behavior of heavily compacted selling clays.
Engng Geol. 64, 233250.
Cuisinier, O. & Masrouri, F. (2001). Study of the hydromechanical
behaviour of a swelling soil from low to very high suctions.
Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Key Issues in Waste Isolation Research,
Paris, 6170.
Delage, P., Howat, M. D. & Cui, Y. J. (1998). The relationship
between suction and swelling properties in a heavily compacted
unsaturated clay. Engng Geol. 50, 117126.
Dueck, A. & Borgesson, L. (2001). Constant volume tests with
suction control performed on a swelling clay. Proc. 6th Int.
Workshop Key Issues in Waste Isolation Research, Paris,
83101.
Escario, V. & Saez, J. (1973). Measurement of the properties of
swelling and collapsing soils under controlled suction. Proc. 3rd
Int. Conf. Expansive Soils, Haifa, 2, 195200.
Esteban, F. (1990). Caracterizacion experimental de la expansividad
de una roca evaportica. PhD thesis, Universidad de Canabria,
Santander (in Spanish).
Gens, A. & Alonso, E. E. (1992). A framework for the behaviour
of unsaturated expansive clays. Can. Geotech. J. 29, 10131032.
40
Justo, J. L., Delgado, A. & Ruiz, J. (1984). The influence of stresspath in the collapse-swelling of soils at the laboratory. Proc. 5th
Int. Conf. Expansive Soils, Adelaide, 6771.
Kraehenbuehl, F., Stoeckli, M. F., Brunner, F., Kahr, G. & MullerVonmoos, M. (1987). Study of the waterbentonite system by
vapour adsorption, immersion calorimetry and X-ray technique:
I. Micropore volumes and internal surface areas, following
Dubinins theory. Clay Miner. 22, 19.
Koch, D. (2002). Bentonites as a basic material for technical base
liners and site encapsulation cut-off walls. Appl. Clay Sci. 21,
111.
Martin, R. T. (1962). Adsorbed water on clay: a review. Proc. 9th
Nat. Conf. Clays and Clay Minerals, Purdue University Pergamon Press: Oxford, 2870.
Ormerod, E. C. & Newman, A. C. D. (1983). Water sorption of Casaturated clays: II. Internal and external surfaces of montmorillonite. Clay Miner. 18, 289299.
Pusch, R. (1982). Mineralwater interactions and their influence on
the physical behaviour of highly compacted Na bentonite. Can.
Geotech. J. 19, 381387.
Pusch, R. & Moreno, L. (2001). Saturation and permeation of
buffer clay. Proc. 6th Int. Workshop Key Issues in Waste Isolation Research, Paris, 7181.
Romero, E., Gens, A. & Lloret, A. (1999). Water permeability,
water retention and microstructure of unsaturated Boom clay.
Engng Geol. 54, 117127.
Sanchez, M., Gens, A., Gimaraes, L. N. & Olivella, S. (2001).
Generalized plasticity model for THM simulations involving