Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
For emotional, social, and developmental reasons this type of feeding is recommended for all
newborn infants but for those in exceptional circumstances. The objective of this study was to
gain a better understanding of what is needed in the early days to enable women to initiate and
continue breastfeeding their infants. Methods: Data from a large-scale national survey of
womens experience of maternity care in England were analyzed using qualitative methods,
focusing on the feeding-related responses. Results: A total of 2,966 women responded to the
survey (62.7% response rate), 2,054 of whom wrote open text responses, 534 relating to infant
feeding. The main themes identified were the mismatch between womens expectations and
experiences and emotional reactions at this time, staff behavior and attitudes, and the
organization of care and facilities. Subthemes related to seeking help, conflicting advice,
pressure to breastfeed, the nature of interactions with staff, and a lack of respect for womens
choices, wishes, previous experience, and knowledge. Conclusions: Many women who succeeded felt that they had learned the hard way and some of those who did not, felt they were
perceived as bad mothers and women who had in some way failed at one of the earliest
tasks of motherhood. What women perceived to be staff perceptions affected how they saw
themselves and what they took away from their early experience of infant feeding. (BIRTH 39:1
March 2012)
Key words: breastfeeding, midwifery, postnatal support
breastfed their infants for the first few days after birth
(3). A similar proportion of mothers (70%) in a 2006
United States survey were exclusively or partially
breastfeeding at 1 week, and at 4 to 6 months this proportion had also reduced to 20 percent (4). Data from
Canada collected over the same time period indicate
higher rates of initial breastfeeding (90%), just over half
of mothers (52%) doing so at 3 months and 14 percent
at 6 months, although more than half were still giving
some breastmilk (54%) at this time (5).
Breastfeeding support has commonly been seen as an
integral part of postnatal care, and women often report
The Maternal Health and Care Research Unit within the National
Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU) is funded by the Department of
Health in England. The views expressed are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health. The original survey was funded by the Department of Health (London, UK), the
Care Quality Commission (formerly Healthcare Commission; London,
UK), and the NHS Information Centre (London, UK).
22
Methods
In a national survey of womens experience of maternity
care in England, a random sample of women who gave
birth in a week in March 2006 were selected by the
Office for National Statistics (ONS) and surveyed at
3 months after the birth (8). Structured question
response formats and some open questions were used.
Reminders were sent to nonrespondents at 2 weeks and
a further questionnaire at 4 weeks. Multi-centre
Research Ethics (MREC) approval was obtained before
the study.
Quantitative data from the survey are used to
describe the women responding and the open text
responses to two open questions used in this qualitative
analysis. The same questions, which also were used in
an earlier survey (10), were: If there was anything
about your postnatal care in hospital that you could
change, what would it be? and Is there anything
else you would like to tell us about your care while
you were pregnant or since you have had your baby?
All feeding-related responses were included in the
analysis.
In the process of qualitative analysis the responses
were read and reread separately by two researchers,
anticipated and emergent themes were identified, and
differences in interpretation were discussed (11). Initially, after reading all the responses, each was coded
under an overarching theme, and by subthemes that had
been identified and agreed upon. For the purposes of
numerical analysis, up to three predominant themes
were coded for each response. Codes were refined further as the analysis progressed in an iterative manner,
and discrepant cases were sought to illuminate the issues
(1214). In rereading the responses, new associations
were made among different facets of the analysis. The
quotations selected and discussed illustrate the themes
arising from the experience of early infant feeding and
support.
Results
The response rate to the survey was 62.7 percent representing 2,966 women. The mean age of the infants at the
time of questionnaire return was 15.5 weeks (median:
15, range: 1328 wk). Using data from the ONS sampling frame, it was possible to compare responders and
nonresponders. Compared with responders, nonresponders were more likely to live in London, be single parents,
born outside the United Kingdom, be younger, live in a
deprived area, be a student, or not state their occupation
(8).
Eighty percent of women reported putting their baby
to the breast at least once. In the first few days 59 percent of women gave breastmilk only, 16 percent breastmilk and formula, and 25 percent formula only. At the
time of the survey 26 percent of women gave breastmilk only, 17 percent breastmilk and formula, and 57
percent formula only (15). Those who responded to the
open questions were slightly more likely to be firsttime mothers, to be white, have left school after
16 years, be older, and live in more advantaged areas
(Table 1).
A total of 1,436 women (48.4%) wrote text responses
about postnatal hospital care, 254 of which (18%)
referred to one or more aspects of infant feeding, and
1,172 women responded to the Anything else you
would like to tell us question, of whom responses from
17 percent (196) related to infant feeding. The analysis
is based on these data.
Table 2 provides an overview of womens responses,
showing four broad themes, which predominantly
related to matching experiences with expectations,
staff behavior and attitudes, emotional reactions,
and the organization of care and facilities. Subthemes
related to seeking help; conflicting advice; pressure to
breastfeed; interactions with staff; and a lack of respect
for womens choices, wishes, previous experience, and
knowledge. The themes raised in response to both questions were similar and are discussed in the text.
23
Some women felt undermined when they had difficulty with breastfeeding:
After my c-section, I struggled with feeding my baby during the
night because I found it hard to sit up and was exhausted and in
discomfort. I was not given much support I felt a bit of a nuisance and it was intimated I should give bottle feeds. I may have
started bottle feeding if this had been my first child. (5061)
Characteristics
Maternal
Age (yr)
1619
2024
2529
3034
3539
40+
Age on leaving full-time education
<17 yr
1718 yr
19+ yr
Still in full-time
education
Previous births
None
One or more
Ethnicity
White
Nonwhite
Place of birth
In the United Kingdom
Outside the United
Kingdom
IMD*
Quintile 1
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5
Infant
Low birthweight (<2,500 g)
Preterm (<37 completed
weeks of gestation)
Women Responding
to Open Question on
Postnatal Stay (n = 1,436)
No. (%)
Women Responding
to Open Question on
Anything Else (n = 1,172)
No. (%)
Women Not
Responding to Open
Questions (n = 902)
No. (%)
54 (3.8)
193 (13.5)
349 (24.5)
470 (33.0)
300 (21.0)
60 (4.2)
38 (2.5)
191 (12.4)
347 (22.5)
542 (35.2)
352 (22.8)
71 (4.6)
45 (5.1)
176 (19.8)
226 (25.4)
269 (30.2)
158 (17.8)
16 (1.8)
333 (23.2)
427 (29.8)
649 (45.5)
16 (1.1)
368 (23.9)
437 (28.3)
720 (46.7)
17 (1.1)
323 (36.7)
266 (30.2)
285 (32.3)
7 (0.8)
638 (46.3)
739 (53.7)
617 (41.5)
868 (58.5)
314 (36.0)
558 (64.0)
1,247 (88.2)
167 (11.8)
1,378 (89.7)
158 (10.3)
750 (84.6)
137 (15.4)
1,192 (84.7)
215 (15.3)
1,283 (84.3)
239 (15.7)
706 (81.4)
161 (18.6)
335 (23.4)
280 (19.6)
293 (20.5)
263 (18.3)
259 (18.1)
357 (23.0)
311 (20.0)
337 (21.7)
279 (18.0)
268 (17.3)
146 (16.2)
146 (16.2)
182 (20.2)
201 (22.5)
224 (26.9)
77 (5.4)
79 (5.5)
94 (6.1)
93 (6.1)
56 (6.3)
49 (5.6)
Five hundred and forty-four women responded to both open questions. Numbers indicate women providing information on the characteristics listed,
excluding missing values, and thus vary.
*Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a small area-level UK government measure with seven domains including income, employment, crime, and
health and disability.
24
Contradictory advice about positioning and attachment were more common when women were having
problems and had seen several midwives:
To be seen by one or as few people as possible to help with
breastfeeding. Every time I pressed my buzzer for help, a
Themes
Womens needs and
expectations
Help and support
Consistent advice
Information
Care for the women
themselves
Care for their baby
Milk supply
Theme totals
Staff behavior and attitudes
Expectation women
will breastfeed
Expectation women
will look after their
own babies
Wishes, choices, and
knowledge respected
Pressure to breastfeed
Institutional rules
Attitudes and language
Physical intervention
Theme totals
Womens emotional reactions
Anxiety and worry
Engaging in a struggle
Feeling guilty
Loneliness and isolation
Theme totals
Organization of care and
facilities
Privacy
Nutrition and meals
Staffing
Length of stay
Neonatal and
transitional care
Equipment and facilities
Theme totals
Overall totals
Postnatal
Hospital Care
Anything Else
about Care
No. (%)
No. (%)
152 (29.5)
41 (8)
29 (5.6)
20 (3.9)
118 (37.8)
27 (8.7)
19 (6.1)
5 (1.6)
8 (1.6)
7 (1.4)
257 (50)
3 (1.0)
13 (4.2)
185 (59.4)
18 (3.5)
19 (6.1)
13 (2.5)
3 (1.0)
18 (3.5)
20 (6.5)
25 (4.8)
6 (1.2)
35 (6.8)
7 (1.4)
122 (23.7)
24 (7.7)
4 (1.3)
10 (3.2)
1 (0.3)
81 (26.1)
21 (4.1)
4 (0.8)
7 (1.4)
18 (3.5)
50 (9.8)
10 (3.2)
9 (2.9)
11 (3.5)
2 (0.6)
32 (10.2)
8 (1.6)
13 (2.5)
33 (6.4)
16 (3.1)
8 (1.6)
1 (0.3)
3 (1.0)
2 (0.6)
2 (0.6)
3 (1.0)
8 (1.6)
86 (16.8)
515 (100.0)
3 (1.0)
14 (4.5)
312 (100.0)
25
Finding that staff did not always support breastfeeding came as a surprise to some women:
I had trouble starting breastfeeding, I asked a midwife to help
me but she just told me to use a bottle! (6666)
Midwives and other staff could be perceived as powerful and authoritative individuals who were in control,
but not always kind or supportive:
I felt very isolated and lonely, and having a private room would
have liked my husband to be able to stay the night with me but
this was not allowed I was kept in for 2 days because I was
26
Night midwives were not very goodI had trouble breastfeeding, and they were very rough and fairly unhelpful when I asked
for help. (3349)
I suffered a few difficulties breastfeeding my baby the midwives made me feel so guilty , they left me very upset and
down about myself a midwifes job is to support a mother
and make her feel positive about herself . they should support you with what you feel is right for you. (2436)
27
just left alone with this new baby and felt very lonely and
scared . I wanted to breastfeed but struggled. (3471)
Organizational Factors
Discussion
Staff shortages, particularly of midwives, were put forward as an explanation for poor care and negative
attitudes:
Midwives were obviously overworked and
staffed often moody and short-tempered. (3075)
under-
Some women perceived staff shortages to be a particular problem at night, feeling more alone at that
time.
28
The responses and the analysis provide insights. The
poor treatment received by some women suggests that
there is room for change. The underlying root causes of
poor care deserve further research, but one may speculate that midwives acting in this manner are likely to be
stressed, have problems in other areas, and not likely to
be enjoying midwifery. Some responses suggested that
staff shortages may be an influential factor, others that
more effective support and advisory systems need to be
in place to help new mothers with infant feeding and
care.
This study was limited by being based on written
responses to questions in a survey. In an interview,
probes can be used to explore the issues raised. However, women may give more forthright and honest
answers to a survey without feeling the need to convey a
positive image to the interviewer. Moreover, it was possible to look at the views of a much greater number of
women than would have been possible using other methods. Peer examination, in which the research process
and outcomes are discussed in an iterative way with
another researcher, increased the validity of the coding
and themes identified. Transferability of the findings can
to some extent be assessed from the detailed description
of the sample given in Table 1.
A summary of the literature on feeding support noted
the importance of consistent advice and information,
practical support, and respect for body boundaries (7).
When breastfeeding is a technically managed activity
and a hands-on approach used to attach the baby to
the breast, they may undermine womens confidence in
their own ability. The problem of conflicting advice has
been emphasized in another qualitative study (16) and in
these analyses. Another study highlighted the importance of time constraints on staff trying to provide a high
standard of care (17). In postnatal care, midwives and
nurses often do not have time to form relationships with
women, leading to labeling and stereotyping of the kind
that some women felt was in operation here. Some
women thought that staff saw them as bad mothers,
and some took on this identity, echoing other observations of breastfeeding women and health professionals
showing that for women breastfeeding is generally equated with being a good mother (18). A qualitative
study examining the association between breastfeeding
and depression noted the devastating effect of unfulfilled
expectations when women had difficulties breastfeeding,
and described the unsupportive, bossy, and judgmental
attitudes of some staff (19).
These study findings are consistent with the literature
described and with that arising in different country contexts (20,21). Women reflected on their own expectations and needs and their emotional and physical
vulnerability, with accounts of inconsistent advice, a
lack of postnatal support, and judgmental attitudes that
Conclusions
Many of the women who succeeded felt that they had
learned the hard way, and some of those who did not,
felt they were perceived as bad mothers and women
who had in some way failed at one of the earliest
tasks of motherhood. What women perceived to be staff
perceptions affected how they saw themselves and what
they took away from their early experience of infant
feeding. Women would prefer information given in
pregnancy to be realistic rather than idealistic. Midwives
working with postnatal women need ongoing training in
breastfeeding to enable them to support women
effectively.
29
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to give many thanks to the women
who participated in the survey.
References
1. Department of Health. Infant Feeding Recommendation. London:
The Stationery Office, 2003.
2. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Infant and Young
Child Feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization,
2003.
3. Healthcare Commission. Towards Better Births: A Review of
Maternity Services in England. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, 2008.
4. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S. Listening to
Mothers II: Report of the Second National US Survey of
Womens Childbearing Experiences, 2006. Accessed July 13,
2011. Available at: http://www.childbirthconnection.org/pdf.asp?
PDFDownload=LTMII_report.
5. Chalmers B, Levitt C, Heaman M, et al. Breastfeeding rates and
hospital breastfeeding practices in Canada: A national survey of
women. Birth 2009;36(2):122132.
6. Cooke M, Sheehan A, Schmied V. A description of the relationship between breastfeeding experiences, breastfeeding satisfaction
and weaning in the first three months after birth. J Hum Lact
2003;19:112.
7. Dykes F. A critical ethnographic study of encounters between
midwives and breast-feeding women in postnatal wards in
England. Midwifery 2005;21:241252.
8. Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C, Brocklehurst P. Recorded
Delivery: A National Survey of Womens Experience of Maternity
Care 2006. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2007.
9. Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, Thornton A. Infant Feeding Survey 2005. London: The Information Centre, 2007.