Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Position:
Teacher I
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Name of Employee:
MFOs
Position:
Head Teacher II
Date of Phase:
Name of Rater: Arturo F. Adriatico Jr.
KRAs
WEIGHT
PER KRA
Teaching-Learning
Process
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(QUALITY,
EFFECIENCY,TIMELINES)
Instructional plan with KSA,
3Ps and 2-As
5 . O
4 .. VS
3 .. S
2 . P
1 . F
10 to more .. O
5 to 9 .. VS
5 to 6 .. S
4 below .. P
Prepared
instructional
plans with KSA, 3Ps and 2As in all subjects handled.
Prepared
appropriate,
adequate and updated
instructional materials.
August-March
40%
Cooperative learning
Applying one or more
teaching techniques and
strategies
Classroom rules
Cooperative learning activity
Initiated
discipline
of
and
Monitored attendance
Conducted remediation/enrichment
programs to improve performance
indicator
AUGUSTMARCH
30%
students
through
classroom rules, guidelines
and individual and group
tasks.
Seat Plan
Roll Call
PUPILS OUTCOMES
sheet
Monitored daily
attendance through
seat plan and roll call.
Positive/productive/saf
e learning environment
Physically motivating
and safe classroom
environment
Monitored and
evaluated and
maintained pupils/
students progress
through complete and
dully filled class record
and grading sheets.
Conducted
remediation/enrichment
programs to improve
performance indicators;
thrice a week for
grades 1 to 3 and twice
a week for grades 4 to
6.
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST MARCH
10%
Communication
letter noted by the
Grade Chairman
Home visitation form
signed by the parent
AUGUST MARCH
30%
Conducted verbal
conferences with
parents for pupils
needing academic
monitoring
Memo/Certificates/certification from
the principal
Received certificate of
Recognition for exemplary
performance in both district and
division level activities
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied to the weight assigned.
______________________
RATER
DEPED RPMS FORMS - Teachers
______________________
RATEE