Committee : Special Political and Decolonization Committee
Topic Area A : Sovereignity, Intervention, And Syria Ukraine considers the world stands largely divided on the issue of intervention within Syria; many western countries, such as the United States, advocate for swift and decisive military intervention on the part of the UN, while China, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, and of course the Syrian government itself, continue to argue vehemently against such actions in support of the current Al-Assad regime, As blood has continued to be shed. Conflict syria is no longer talking about intervention, the conflict sovereignty, the limits of the area, the authority of the state etc. , But already confronted with the interests of humanity, those are the interests of all nations including United Nation Security Council. this level of discord within the international community that has caused the peace process of Syria to be essentially stagnant, Conflict has continued to escalate despite international peace efforts. 15,152 people were. In addition, the vast majority of those killed were civilians, many of whom were innocent of any participation in rebellious activities. The cause of this military escalation of conflict is the perception that governmental control is eroding within Syria. There have been numerous high level defections within the Syrian elite. In particular, Ukraine believes that the United Nations has interests and involve themselves from Syria and it needs to have a support to make a move a step in adoption of a decision by the interests of humanity. The future for Syria is a bleak picture. In addition to the fact that the current war is leading to an incredible amount of devastation, death, and displacement, there is little hope for long term peace. Syria is immensely divided. There are countless rebel groups in Syria, and many have different visions of how the country should be led, Ukraine insist upon intervention in helping the opposition to become more unified, There are many different groups who also have vested interests within the country and are involving themselves in the conflict, whether they exist within or without Syria itself. The only hope for a successful end to the conflict in Syria may be if foreign powers can reconcile their differences and present a united front to the Syrian government and opposition. China should support the intervention of syria, for the creation of peace, stop the conflict, which killed many civilians China has simply repeatedly voted intervention because of their consistently opposition to involvement in the majority of foreign matters. They have few vested interests in Syria. Ukraine with the exception of the specifically mentioned countries in the first bloc group (as well as some other exceptions as each country adjusts its foreign policy to the developing situation) the vast majority of the other nations in the world seek some form, however small, of intervention into the Syrian crisis. To cite a few specific examples in this bloc the European Union and its member nations have frequently stated a need to stop the bloodshed. The European Union remains hesitant upon which course of action would be best to take in order to successfully bring about a cease to the violence while simultaneously providing an environment for a political settlement to be reached between the opposition and President Assads government, the ukraine remains opposed to the violence and seeks an immediate cease to the bloodshed.