Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Learning outcomes
At the end of this session participants should be able to:
recognise that there are surface and deep elements in subject learning
overhead projector
13
MODULE 1
Approach
Following initial input, participants work in non-language-specific groups on
sample English texts to devise teaching strategies that encourage students
to take a deep approach to learning, using the four elements of effective
learning. Each group works for approximately 45 minutes, then shares its
ideas with the whole group. The various ideas are subsequently typed up
and distributed to all participants.
MODULE 1
Time required
Tutor input
Group work
Feedback
1 hour
45 minutes
15 minutes
Total
2 hours
14
This module provides an underpinning to all the DOPLA materials in that it introduces and
discusses important concepts in pedagogy. Good teaching is predicated on good learning,
so it is essential to understand what factors make for effective learning. The session
therefore explores students conceptions of and approaches to learning, discusses notions
of deep and surface learning, and argues that the best conditions for effective learning will
include four key elements: a motivational context, learner activity, learner interaction and
a well-structured knowledge base.
15
MODULE 1
1.1 Introduction
i.e. that some bits of knowledge have more power than others. The limitation of a concept
of knowledge that stops at this level is that the student cannot deal with knowledge or
information that does not fit the rules, and cannot see the bigger conceptual picture of
the subject as a whole. That is why when we are talking about sophisticated concepts of
learning, we need to consider categories four and five: learning as making sense and
understanding reality.
MODULE 1
Levels 4 and 5
At these levels the student genuinely makes sense of the subject, understands what the
important concepts are and sees how the various aspects of the subject fit together.
Typically, such students will have internalised their understanding of the subject and will
be able to express that understanding in their own words. The difference between Level 4
and Level 5 is to do with the scope of the conceptual overview, with Level 5 denoting
someone with a personal, integrated worldview.
University work is ultimately concerned with helping students articulate subject
understanding at Levels 4 and 5. This will include the other levels of learning, so students
will be memorising and applying procedures as well. Also, the process of understanding is
long and drawn-out and proceeds unevenly: students often appear to know and to be
able to do something one week, but then seem to have forgotten it the next week.
Integrating new knowledge into existing knowledge is a slow business. Students frequently
have to re-learn learning, or have it presented to them in a different way. That is why
much teaching (and this is especially true of language teaching) has to be recursive and
repetitive, to take account of these loops of learning that involve stops and starts, gains
and losses.
How do we know when a student has really learned something? This is hard to gauge,
but most teachers would agree that a student has understood something when they can
put it into their own words, rather than just repeat the teachers words; when they can do
this over time (showing that the knowledge is assimilated); and when they can apply their
knowledge successfully to solve new problems or deal with new situations.
How do teachers initiate and facilitate successful learning at these higher levels? This is
where the question of the students approach to learning comes in.
at a later date, possibly in an exam or when asked a question by the teacher. That type of
learning maps onto the first three levels of the hierarchy: amassing knowledge, memorising,
and applying formulae. This approach is called the surface approach.
Every subject has its blend of surface and deep learning moments: there are times when
the student has to practise without understanding, memorise without seeing the big picture,
in other words, trust the teacher. But these surface elements need to lead towards
deep learning, when the student comes to make sense of what he/she has learned and
sees how things fit together. The teacher needs to achieve the right balance, both in
recognising the blend of surface and deep approaches appropriate to learning the specific
subject, and in creating classroom strategies that bring the two together fruitfully, so that,
overall, the learner takes a deep approach to the subject.
17
MODULE 1
The other approach is seen when learners are interested in the material for its own sake
and want to understand for themselves what is going on. This is a much more inclusive,
personal approach and maps onto Levels 4 and 5 in the concepts of learning categories.
This is called the deep approach.
MODULE 1
Obviously teachers want interested, inspired, enthusiastic students who are involved in
the material being taught and want to transform it into information meaningful to them.
This is difficult to achieve, but many effective strategies are available to teachers and
these will be explored in depth during this training course. However, speaking broadly,
good teachers will:
take time to think about what they are asking their students to do
extend the learning over a period of time
be considerate towards individual students.
The deep approach needs time for consideration and reflection, and teachers should
always make allowances for the amount of time students will need if they are to become
involved in the task and to have an understanding of it.
It is also very important to tell students precisely what is expected of them, and why they
are being asked to do something. Teachers often imagine it is utterly self-evident why
students should be writing an essay or studying a particular unit in a grammar book.
Teaching needs to be more transparent so that students can contextualise a task and see
its relevance to their learning as a whole. Only in this way can they fully make sense of
what they are learning, and thus take a deep approach.
Students should have opportunities to exercise responsible choice in the method and
content of study. As far as possible, learning should be personalised by choosing examples
and tasks that students will find relevant to their own experience and concerns. It is often
useful for teachers to ask themselves: How would I feel if I were the student being asked
to do this? and How would I feel about the setting in which I am being asked to do it?.
Finally, the teacher needs to bear in mind that different students learn in different ways.
Some students prefer activity, getting on with something straightaway. Others like to reflect
on information and mull it over. Students also learn at different speeds. Planning for group
or class work needs to accommodate different learning preferences, so teachers need to
use a multiplicity of strategies and tasks, and be prepared to revisit earlier learning in new
18
ways to ensure retention and consolidation. The aim is that at the end, all students come
out with a deep level of understanding based on knowledge of broad principles supported
by a sound factual basis.
Integrated learning is very difficult to achieve, even within the confines of a single subject.
It is difficult to get students to bring knowledge from one area and put it into another, and
difficult to integrate new knowledge into existing knowledge. In language learning this is
often seen when the teacher introduces a new structure. Students will practise the new
structure and seem to know it, then the teacher will set a task that asks students to use the
new structure in the framework of their existing knowledge of the language. Often,
disconcertingly, the students fail to do this properly. This is part of the problem of the
learning loop mentioned above. Integrated learning is complex. Focussed concentration
on a simple task does not transfer easily into a complex or multi-faceted task. That is why
teaching has to be repetitive and recursive, until new knowledge gradually becomes
assimilated into the students whole way of thinking in the subject.
The above example is a good illustration of the Level 3 concept of knowledge (applying
formulae or rules). The students apply the formula and think they have learned something
new. However, it has not yet become part of Level 4 making sense. They have yet to
integrate it into the rest of their knowledge. Simply getting students to reproduce something
that they have memorised as a rule does not mean that they have internalised it.
When teachers set tasks, they start off with things that are straightforward and make them
more complex, either by making the initial task more difficult, or including some other
elements. This is cumulative learning, and an important part of planning it is the sequencing
of tasks to provide an appropriate scaffolding for students learning.
19
MODULE 1
Effective learning is active learning. As students confront material they ask themselves
such questions as: What is this about? How am I to understand this? What questions
does it raise? What do I need to know to go further?
it relevant to the student. Ideally, students should respond actively to tasks, and feel that
they need to know the answer to something because they are intellectually provoked, or
intrigued, or feel this might be useful or interesting knowledge for them personally.
MODULE 1
Learner activity
Students do not learn well if they are simply given something and told to do it. Nor do they
learn all that effectively by watching somebody else do a task (modelling), although this
can be a help. In the end, students learn by doing things themselves, because that is the
way they find out what the difficulties are for them. In learning, students need to go through
for themselves the processes of thinking and the processes of action, so active learning is
very important. Activity is also important because passive listening is difficult to sustain for
an extended period of time: concentration lapses and learning ceases. Learners attention
can be regained only if they are stimulated through active involvement.
Interaction with others
Teachers want to have as much activity and language practice going on in the classroom
as possible. It is impossible to have each student work directly with the teacher all the
time. So, at a simple level, students working together in small groups have more
opportunities to practise the material.
There is also a pedagogic reason why such interaction is a good thing. Students can learn
very effectively from each other because they are very often at similar stages of
understanding. They are speaking the same language at a level deeper than that of mere
words. Teachers are often so far ahead of students in their grasp of the subject that they
cannot clarify students difficulties for them in words best fitted for their level of
comprehension. So learners at levels of ability, understanding and knowledge that are
largely similar can work with each other and can learn from each other. This point is not
self-evident, especially because students see teachers as the experts who can tell them
what they need to know. It is therefore a good idea in this, as in all aspects of teaching, to
explain to the students why you are asking them to work together.
The well-structured knowledge base
In simple language, teachers aim to start from where the students are and move at a
speed appropriate for them. This entails initial diagnosis of their knowledge and ability,
and the consequent tailoring of tasks. Teachers should introduce new knowledge only
when existing knowledge is consolidated. And, bearing in mind the learning loop, they
should incorporate frequent revision and reinforcement through a variety of settings and
activities to ensure that, over time, students internalise and integrate the knowledge.
20
For this exercise participants should work in non-language-specific groups to put into
practice the ideas they have just been considering. A number of short English texts (to
provide a common language) should be provided. Each group should choose a text and
devise language-teaching strategies for that text that will encourage students to take a
deep approach to learning. Groups should include the four elements of effective learning
in their strategies. The time for the task should be approximately 45 minutes, and the
results copied onto flipchart paper. Each piece of paper should then be pinned onto the
classroom walls, and each group should elect a member to talk the rest of the class
through their ideas, explaining the thinking behind them. After the session, the course
tutors should have the sheets typed up and each participant should receive a copy of all
the strategies produced, together with the relevant texts.
21
MODULE 1
Honey P. & Mumford A. (1989): The Manual of Learning Opportunities. Peter Honey,
Maidenhead.
Honey P. & Mumford A. (1990): The Opportunist Learner: A Learners Guide to Using
Learning Opportunities. Peter Honey, Maidenhead.
Honey P. & Mumford A. (1992): The Manual of Learning Styles. Peter Honey, Maidenhead.
Marton F., Hounsell D. and Entwistle N. (1997): The Experience of Learning. Scottish
Academic Press Ltd, Edinburgh.
Mumford A. (1999): Effective Learning. IPD, London.
MODULE 1
Parlett M., Simons H., Simmonds R. & Hewton E. (1988): Learning from Learners. (SCED
paper 54) SCED Publications, Birmingham.
Rust C. & Wallace J. (1995): Helping Students to Learn from Each Other - Supplemental
Instruction. SEDA, Birmingham.
22
OHT 1.1
1.
2.
Learning as memorising
3.
4.
5.
23
MODULE 1
OHT 1.2
Surface approach
MODULE 1
24
OHT 1.3
25
MODULE 1
Deep approach
OHT 1.4
MODULE 1
26
OHT 1.5
27
MODULE 1
OHT 1.6
Effective learning
MODULE 1
Active learning
- posing own questions and seeking the
respective answers
Integrated learning
- learning applied to a variety of subjects/
disciplines concurrently
- learning applied in context of real-life
situations
Cumulative learning
- sequenced learning experiences
- experiences that become p rogre ssive ly
less straightforward and more complex a n d
challenging
28
OHT 1.7
MODULE 1
Learner activity
Interaction with others
A well-structured knowledge base
29
Handout 1
Module 1
HOW STUDENTS LEARN
Students concepts of learning
1. Learning as an increase of knowledge
2. Learning as memorising
3. Learning as acquiring facts or procedures to be used
4. Learning as making sense
5. Learning as understanding reality
MODULE 1
Surface approach
Students motivated by concern to complete the course or by fear of failure
Students fulfil the assessment requirements by memorising factual material
The process most used is rote learning
Outcome: a knowledge of factual information and a superficial level of understanding
Deep approach
Students motivated by an interest in the subject matter and/or its vocational relevance
Effective learning
Active Learning
- posing own questions and seeking the respective answers
Integrated Learning
- learning applied to a variety of subjects/disciplines concurrently
- learning applied in context of real-life situations
Cumulative Learning
31
MODULE 1
lecturers personal commitment to the subject matter and stresses its meaning and
relevance to students
Clearly stated academic expectations
Opportunities to exercise responsible choice in the method and content of study
Interest in and background knowledge of the subject matter
Previous experience of educational settings that encourage these approaches
MODULE 1
32