Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PVP2012
July 15-19, 2012, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA
PVP2012-78589
ABSTRACT
The use of creep strength enhanced ferritic alloys such
as Grade 91 in fossil power plants has become popular for
high temperature piping applications. Since Grade 91 has
higher stress allowables than Grade 22, a designer can
specify thinner component wall thicknesses, resulting in
lower through-wall thermal stresses during transient events
and lower material and piping support costs.
During the past two decades, Grade 91 has been used
successfully in fossil power plants. However, this alloy
has had some incidents of non-optimal weldment
microstructure. In this case study, Brinell hardness tests of
an ASME A182 Grade F91 (F91) wye block, including
upstream and downstream F91 spools, revealed several
readings of soft material, as low as 168HB. A study of
creep rupture tests of degraded Grade 91 specimens
revealed that the lower bound creep rupture curve of the
degraded Grade 91 material is above the average creep
rupture curve of Grade 22 material for the range of the
specific piping operating stresses.
Based on the empirical evidence that the average
Grade 22 material creep rupture curve is conservative for
the creep rupture of degraded Grade 91 material, a life
consumption evaluation was performed for the degraded
Grade 91 weldments using Grade 22 creep rupture
properties.
A life fraction analysis was performed
considering the redistributed maximum principal stresses,
based on simulation of piping displacements obtained from
the hot and cold walkdowns. This study also considered
the recent history of the specific piping system operating
pressures and temperatures.
1
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
2
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
CONCLUSIONS
This paper provides a life consumption study on the
evaluation of degraded Grade 91 weldments. This study
indicates that API 579 and ASME B31.1 Grade 91 creep
rupture properties are not conservative for the worst
Grade 91 creep rupture data anomalies. It was determined
that the creep rupture properties of degraded Grade 91
weldments can be conservatively evaluated using Grade 22
average base metal creep rupture properties.
The life consumption evaluations for the Grades F91to-F91 weldments indicated that less than 30% life had
3
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
APTECH
is
[9]
Table 1
greatly
REFERENCES
[1] Isamu Nonaka, Takuya Ito, Fumio Takemasa,
Kensuke Saitou, Yoshikazu Miyachi, Akigo Fujita,
2007, Full Size Internal Pressure Creep Test for
Welded P91 Hot Reheat Elbow, International
Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Volume 84,
pp. 97-103.
[2] Kong, B.O., Kin, J.T., Lee, Y.S., and Ryu, S.H.,
2007, Thermal Histories Causing Low Hardness and
the Minimum Hardness Replacement in a
Mod.9Cr1Mo Steel for Boiler, EPRI International
Conference on Boiler Tube and HRSG Tube Failures
and Inspections, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
(October 16-18, 2007).
[3] Shingledecker, J. P., Santella, M. L., and Kleuh, R.
L.,
2007,
Evaluation
of
Heat-Treatment
Temperatures and Corresponding Properties of
Improperly Heat-Treated Grade 91, Proceedings of
Industry and Research Experience in the Use of P/T
91 and Other New Steels, European Technology
Development (ETD), London, UK (June 20-21,
2007).
[4] Brett, S. J., Bates, J. S., and Thomson, R. C., 2004,
Aluminum Nitride Precipitation in Low Strength
Grade 91 Power Plant Steels, Proceedings to the
Fourth International Conference on Advances in
Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants,
Hilton Head, SC (October 25-28, 2004). ASMInternational, Materials Park, OH, 2005. 1183-1197.
[5] Ryu, S. H., Lee, Y. S., Kong, B. O., and Kim, J. T.,
2002, A Study on the Variation of the Hardness and
the Creep Rupture Strength with Thermal Histories in
a Mod. 9Cr-1Mo Steel, First Int. Conference on
Advanced Structural Steels (ICASS2002,) Organized
by NIMS, Tsukuba, Japan (May 22-24, 2002).
[6] B.S. 860, 1967, Tables for Comparison of Hardness
Scales, British Standards Institute.
[7] API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, 2007,Second Edition, June
2007, Table F.31.
[8] ASME, 2010, ASME B31.1-2010 Edition, Power
Piping, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31, An
American National Standard, The American Society
of Mechanical Engineers, New York., NY.
Diamond
Pyramid Scale
HV10 HV30
Brinell Standard
Ball (HB)
421
400
263
214
195
189
180
175
162
155
400
380
250
200
186
180
172
167
155
148
4
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
5
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
6
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms
1.0
Support Number
0.0
1NE
1SW
12
4E
4W
6E
6W
31
10E
10W
11E
11W
-1.0
Displacement (Inches)
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
Observed
-7.0
Design
-8.0
-9.0
1.0
Support Number
0.0
Displacement (inches)
1NE
1SW
12
4E
4W
6E
6W
31
10E
10W
11E
11W
-1.0
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
Observed
Simulated
-5.0
-6.0
7
Downloaded From: http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 04/20/2015 Terms of Use: http://asme.org/terms