Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ecological Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleng
Short communication
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 August 2010
Received in revised form 6 January 2011
Accepted 23 January 2011
Available online 4 March 2011
Keywords:
Benthic ux
Mercury
Monomethylmercury
Elemental mercury
Wetland
Organic matter
a b s t r a c t
In order to evaluate the role of hypoxic conditions of overlying water in the benthic ux and speciation of Hg, we analyzed sediment cores from hypoxic or oxic sites downstream from a sewage outfall in
the Damyang Riverine Wetland, Korea. Each core was analyzed for total Hg (THg), monomethylmercury
(MMHg), and elemental Hg (Hg0 ) from sediment, and for THg and MMHg from pore water. Hypoxic conditions of the overlying water near the sewage outfall were associated with a peak production of Hg0 , but
the lowest production of MMHg, in the upper 2 cm sediments. The benthic uxes of THg and MMHg were
estimated at 1302109 ng m2 day1 and 12 to 260 ng m2 day1 , respectively. The order of MMHg ux
from sediment to overlying water at each site did not follow the order of MMHg concentration in sediment, but was highest in hypoxic water conditions. The results suggest that maintaining oxic conditions
in wetland water is important for decreasing the transfer of MMHg from sediment into overlying water.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Riverine and coastal wetlands are rich in oral and faunal
species and provide nourishing habitats for aquatic ecosystems
(Trebitz et al., 2009). In wetland habitats, pollutants such as heavy
metals can be removed from surface waters by several different
processes including particle sedimentation, ltration by macrophytes, adsorption, and biological assimilation (El-Sheikh et al.,
2010; Sasmaz et al., 2008). Of these processes, sedimentation seems
to be dominant with respect to metal removal (Lung and Light,
1996; Walker and Hurl, 2002). Therefore, understanding the key
factors affecting metal transfer from sediment to water is important for prediction of the remobilization and bioaccumulation of
heavy metals deposited in wetland sediments.
Monomethylmercury (MMHg) is a toxic form of mercury (Hg)
that bioaccumulates and biomagnies within aquatic food webs.
In stagnant freshwater environments, such as at banks or wetlands, most MMHg is produced by biotic processes occurring in
anoxic sediments (Gilmour et al., 1992; King et al., 2002). In particular, sulfate-reducing bacteria are capable of converting inorganic
Hg(II) into MMHg using methyltransferase enzymes that are normal components of the acetate metabolic pathway (Choi et al.,
1994). Given the high biological activities of wetland microbial
Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 62 715 2438; fax: +82 62 715 2434.
E-mail address: shan@gist.ac.kr (S. Han).
0925-8574/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.01.011
990
For the analysis of THg in the surface and pore water samples, each acidied water sample was oxidized with 0.22 M
BrCl solution (0.5% v/v), then subsequently reduced with 4.3 M
NH2 OHHCl (0.2% v/v) solution (US EPA, 2002). For sediment THg
analysis, approximately 0.5 g of freeze-dried sediment was oxidized overnight in PTFE bottles with 4 mL of 12 N HCl and 1 mL
of 14 N HNO3 . The THg in water samples and sediment digests
was detected using cold vapor atomic uorescence spectroscopy
(CVAFS; Choe et al., 2004). For quality control of the THg in the
water and sediment samples, BCR-579 (coastal seawater, IRMM)
and ERM-CC580 (estuarine sediment, IRMM), respectively, were
used as certied reference materials (CRM). The recoveries of the
water CRM were averaged to 98 9.7% (mean SD, n = 3), and those
of the matrix spike were averaged to 95% (n = 2). The recoveries of
the sediment CRM were averaged to 103 12% (n = 3), and those
of the matrix spike were averaged to 105 11% (n = 3). The relative percent difference for duplicate analyses of THg in water and
sediment were 11% (n = 7) and 14% (n = 22), respectively. Elemental mercury in the sediment samples was measured following the
methods described by Bouffard and Amyot (2009).
Monomethylmercury in the freeze-dried sediment samples
(0.51 g) was extracted into the organic phase following a reaction
with 5 mL of acidic KBr solution, 1 mL of 1 mol L1 CuSO4 solution,
and 10 mL of CH2 Cl2 (Bloom et al., 1999). After organic extraction,
MMHg was back-extracted from the organic phase into the aqueous phase using N2 gas, as described by Bloom et al. (1999). The
sediment extracts and water samples were analyzed for MMHg
by aqueous phase ethylation, trapping on a Tenax column, gas
chromatography separation, thermal decomposition, and detection by CVAFS (Bloom et al., 1999). The average recovery of the CRM
(ERM-CE464, tuna sh, IRMM) was 110 2% (n = 4), and that of the
matrix spike was 102 13% (n = 3). The relative percent difference
for duplicate analyses of MMHg in water and sediment averaged
19% (n = 7) and 18% (n = 22), respectively.
991
Table 1
Concentrations of THg, loss on ignition (LOI), MMHg, %MMHg/THg, Hg0 , and %Hg0 /THg in sediment cores from the Damyang Riverine Wetlands. Temperature of the overlying
water was 17 C.
B1
C1
02
24
46
68
810
02
24
46
68
810
02
24
46
68
810
02
24
46
68
810
02
24
THg (ng g1 )
1450
314
123
331
174
111
138
684
180
114
98.9
83.7
139
59.2
33.2
144
139
65.2
182
115
65.9
39.9
LOI (%)
MMHg (pg g1 )
MMHg/THg (%)
Hg0 (ng g1 )
2.0
0.72
1.1
1.1
0.74
2.8
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.7
2.2
2.2
1.3
0.96
0.27
4.6
3.5
2.0
1.4
0.89
1.0
0.80
407
46.9
53.9
352
56.3
186
594
163
96.6
133
828
432
263
23.8
11.1
454
623
364
274
53.0
757
181
0.028
0.015
0.044
0.11
0.032
0.17
0.43
0.024
0.054
0.12
0.84
0.52
0.19
0.040
0.033
0.32
0.45
0.56
0.15
0.046
1.1
0.45
985
269
80.8
201
32.4
28.8
15.4
591
62.3
7.80
2.90
0.700
38.0
34.1
11.9
45.5
3.30
3.30
94.5
55.4
26.4
3.70
68
86
67
61
19
26
11
86
34
6.9
2.9
0.83
27
57
36
31
2.3
4.9
52
48
40
9.3
in Korea (50 ng g1 , Park et al., 2009). The THg concentration measured near the STP discharge point (Site A) was similar to that
of sediments contaminated with Hg from anthropogenic activities (5008000 ng g1 ; Biester et al., 2002; Gray et al., 2006). The
sediment concentrations of THg at Site A showed a surface peak,
suggesting higher Hg deposition in recent years, which agrees with
the discharge record of the STP: the STP began releasing sewage in
1999.
In general, the LOI concentrations showed a decreasing trend
with depth (Table 1), which is typical for LOI in freshwater sediments, and indicates active carbon mineralization near the surface
of the sediment (Bouffard and Amyot, 2009). While the LOI for
Site B1 also decreased with depth, the surface concentration of
LOI was higher at Site B1 than at Sites A, B, C, or C1 which is in
agreement with the sediment composition at each site (A and C1:
sand, B and C: silty sand, and B1: sandy silt; Shepards classication). Organic matter content is known to inuence the surface
distribution of sediment THg due to a strong association between
organic matter and THg (Warner et al., 2005; Delongchamp et al.,
2009). Indeed, the surface distribution of THg showed a positive
linear relationship with %LOI for Sites B, C, B1 and C1 (Fig. 1). Site
A showed higher THg concentration (1450 ng g1 ) than expected
from the %LOI (2.0%) due to the treated sewage discharge. For other
depths, no signicant correlation was found between THg and %LOI
(r2 = 0.11, p = 0.14).
3.2. Enhanced %MMHg/THg in sediment under oxic water
conditions
0-2cm
2-4cm
4-6cm
6-8cm
8-10cm
r2=0.99
p<0.001
%LOI
Depth (cm)
Due to the treated sewage discharges from the STP close to Site
A, overlying waters at this site were hypoxic on the sampling date:
DO concentrations were 51 M (Site A), 250 M (B), 260 M (C),
240 M (B1), and 240 M (C1). Monomethylmercury in the upper
2 cm of sediment ranged from 186 to 828 pg g1 (Table 1). The
highest MMHg content was detected at the Site C, which was furthest downstream from the STP, and the lowest MMHg content
was detected at Site B, which is in contrast to the THg distribution. According to this order, MMHg discharged from the STP is
not the major source of the MMHg deposited in the surface sediment, which indicates the importance of in situ production within
the sediment (Gilmour et al., 1998; King et al., 2002). Vertically,
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
992
700
A
B
B1
C
C1
600
-1
400
Hg (ng g )
500
300
r2=0.95
p<0.001
100
200
50
100
0
200
400
50
600
100
150
800
200
1000
Fig. 3. Benthic uxes of THg and MMHg in the Damyang Riverine Wetlands, Korea.
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the THg and Hg0 in sediment cores of Sites A, B,
C, B1, and C1 ([Hg0 ] = 0.92 [THg] 69).
Dw C
x
2
(1)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Sun-Baek Bang for technical support. We appreciate the support of Hyunji Kim, Jiyi Jang, and Choonho Lee during
sample collection and preparation. This study was supported by
the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea, through
the Institute of Science and Technology for Sustainability (UNU &
GIST Joint Program). The research was also supported by a National
Research Foundation of Korea Grant, funded by the Korean government (2009-0074529).
References
Allard, B., Arsenie, I., 1991. Abiotic reduction of mercury by humic substances in
aquatic systeman important process for the mercury cycle. Water Air Soil
Pollut. 56, 457464.
Andra, M.A.N., Edmar, C.S., 2003. Operon mer: Bacterial resistance to mercury and
potential for bioremediation of contaminated environments. Genet. Mol. Res. 2,
92101.
Benoit, J.M., Gilmour, C.C., Mason, R.P., 2001. Aspects of bioavailability of mercury for
methylation in pure cultures of desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 67, 5158.
Biester, H., Mller, G., Schler, H.F., 2002. Binding and mobility of mercury in soils
contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants. Sci. Total Environ. 284,
191203.
Bloom, N.S., Gill, G.A., Cappellino, S., Dobbs, C., McShea, L., Driscoll, C., Mason, R.,
Rudd, J., 1999. Speciation and cycling of mercury in Lavaca Bay, Texas, Sediments.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 713.
Boudreau, B.P., 1996. The diffusive tortuosity of ne-grained unlithied sediments.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 31393142.
Bouffard, A., Amyot, M., 2009. Importance of elemental mercury in lake sediments.
Chemosphere 74, 10981103.
Canrio, J., Vale, C., Caetano, M., Madureira, M.J., 2003. Mercury in contaminated sediments and pore waters enriched in sulphate (Tagus Estuary Portugal). Environ.
Pollut. 126, 425433.
Choe, K.Y., Gill, G.A., Lehman, R.D., Han, S., Heim, W.A., Coale, K.H., 2004. Sedimentwater exchange of total mercury and monomethyl mercury in the San Francisco
Bay-Delta. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 15121527.
Choi, S.-C., Chase Jr., T., Bartha, R., 1994. Metabolic pathways leading to mercury methylation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60,
40724077.
Covelli, S., Faganeli, J., Horvat, M., Brambati, A., 1999. Porewater distribution and
benthic ux measurements of mercury and methylmercury in the Gulf of Trieste
(Northern Adriatic Sea). Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci. 48, 415428.
Covelli, S., Faganeli, J., De Vittor, C., Predonzani, S., Acquavita, A., Horvat, M., 2008.
Benthic uxes of mercury species in a lagoon environment (Grado Lagoon,
Northern Adriatic Sea Italy). Appl. Geochem. 23, 529546.
Delongchamp, T.M., Lean, D.R.S., Ridal, J.J., Blais, J.M., 2009. Sediment mercury
dynamics and historical trends of mercury deposition in the St. Lawrence
River area of concern near Cornwall, Ontario Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 407,
40954104.
Driscoll, C.T., Yan, C., Schoeld, C.L., Munson, R., Holsapple, J., 1994. The mercury
cycle and sh in the Adirondack lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 136A143A.
Drott, A., Lambertsson, L., Bjrn, E., Skyllberg, U., 2007. Importance of dissolved
neutral mercury suldes for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 22702276.
El-Sheikh, M.A., Saleh, H.I., El-Quosy, D.E., Mahmoud, A.A., 2010. Improving water
quality in polluted drains with free water surface constructed wetlands. Ecol.
Eng. 36, 14781484.
Gill, G.A., Bruland, K.W., 1990. Mercury speciation in surface freshwater systems in
California and other areas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24, 13921400.
Gill, G.A., Bloom, N.S., Cappellino, S., Driscoll, C.T., Dobbs, C., McShea, L., Mason,
R., Rudd, J.W.M., 1999. Sediment-water uxes of mercury in Lavaca Bay Texas.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 663669.
Gilmour, C.C., Henry, E.A., Mitchell, R., 1992. Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 22812287.
Gilmour, C.C., Riedel, G.S., Ederington, M.C., Bell, J.T., Benoit, J.M., Gill, G.A., Stordal,
M.C., 1998. Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic
gradient in the northern Everglades. Biogeochemistry 40, 327345.
Gobeil, C., Cossa, D., 1993. Mercury in sediments and sediment pore water in the
Laurentian Trough. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 17941800.
Gray, J.E., Hines, M.E., Biester, H., 2006. Mercury methylation inuenced by areas
of past mercury mining in the Terlingua district, Southwest Texas USA. Appl.
Geochem. 21, 19401954.
Guentzel, J.L., 2009. Wetland inuences on mercury transport and bioaccumulation
in South Carolina. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 13441353.
993
Goulet, R.R., Holmes, J., Page, B., Poissant, L., Siciliano, S.D., Lean, D.R.S., et al.,
2007. Mercury transformations and uxes in sediments of a riverine wetland.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 33933406.
Han, S., Obraztsova, A., Pretto, P., Choe, K.Y., Gieskes, J., Deheyn, D.D., Tebo, B.M.,
2007. Biogeochemical factors affecting mercury methylation in sediments of
the Venice Lagoon Italy. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 655663.
Han, S., Obraztsova, A., Pretto, P., Deheyn, D.D., Gieskes, J., Tebo, B.M., 2008. Sulde
and iron control on mercury speciation in anoxic estuarine sediment slurries.
Mar. Chem. 111, 214220.
Holmes, J., Lean, D., 2006. Factors that inuence methylmercury ux rates from
wetland sediments. Sci. Total Environ. 368, 306319.
Horvth, O., Vogler, A., 1998. Photoreduction of mercury(II) in aqueous solution
in the presence of cyclohexene hydroxomercuration and two-stage photolysis.
Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1, 270272.
King, J.K., Kostka, J.E., Frischer, M.E., Saunders, F.M., Jahnke, R.A., 2001. A quantitative
relationship that demonstrates mercury methylation rates in marine sediments
are based on the community composition and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 24912496.
King, J.K., Harmon, S.M., Fu, T.T., Gladden, J.B., 2002. Mercury removal, methylmercury formation, and sulfate-reducing bacteria proles in wetland mesocosms.
Chemosphere 46, 859870.
KWRC (Korea Water Resources Corporation), 2010, http://english.kwater.or.kr/.
Lalonde, J.D., Amyot, M., Kraepiel, A.M.L., Morel, F.M.M., 2001. Photooxidation of
Hg(0) in articial and natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 13671372.
Lung, W.S., Light, R.N., 1996. Modelling copper removal in wetland ecosystems. Ecol.
Model. 93, 89100.
Mason, R.P., Fitzgerald, W.F., Hurley, J., Hanson Jr., A.K., Donaghay, P.L., Sieburth, J.M.,
1993. Mercury biogeochemical cycling in a stratied estuary. Limnol. Oceanogr.
38, 12271241.
NWC (National Wetland Center), 2010, http://www.wetland.go.kr/en/main.html.
Park, J.S., Lee, J.S., Kim, G.B., Cha, J.S., Shin, S., Kang, H.G., Hong, E.J., Chung, G.T.,
Kim, Y.H., 2009. Mercury and methylmercury in freshwater sh and sediments
in South Korea using newly adopted purge and trap GCMS detection method.
Water Air Soil Pollut. 207, 391401.
Qumerais, B., Cossa, D., Rondeau, B., Pham, T.T., Fortin, B., 1998. Mercury distribution in relation to iron and manganese in the waters of the St Lawrence river.
Sci. Total Environ. 213, 193201.
Ramalhosa, E., Segade, S.R., Pereira, E., Vale, C., Duarte, A., 2006. Mercury cycling
between the water column and surface sediments in a contaminated area. Water
Res. 40, 28932900.
Rothenberg, S.E., Ambrose, R.F., Jay, J.A., 2008. Mercury cycling in surface water, pore
water and sediments of Mugu Lagoon CA, USA. Environ. Pollut. 154, 3245.
Sasmaz, A., Obek, E., Hasar, H., 2008. The accumulation of heavy metals in Typha
latifolia L. grown in a stream carrying secondary efuent. Ecol. Eng. 33, 278284.
Shi, J., Liang, L., Jiang, G., Jin, X., 2005. The speciation and bioavailability of mercury
in sediments of Haihe River. Chin. Environ. Int. 3, 357365.
Trebitz, A.S., Brazner, J.C., Pearson, M.S., Peterson, G.S., Tanner, D.K., Taylor, D.L.,
2009. Patterns in habitat and sh assemblages within Great Lakes coastal
wetlands and implications for sampling design. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66,
13431354.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Method 1631, Revision E:
Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry. USEPA 821-R-02-019, Washington, DC.
Walker, D.J., Hurl, S., 2002. The reduction of heavy metals in a stormwater wetland.
Ecol. Eng. 18, 407414.
Warner, K.A., Bonzongo, J.C.J., Roden, E.E., Ward, G.M., Green, A.C., Chaubey, I., Lyons,
W.B., Arrington, D.A., 2005. Effect of watershed parameters on mercury distribution in different environmental compartments in the Mobile Alabama River
Basin, USA. Sci. Total Environ. 347, 187207.
Wiatrowski, H.A., Ward, P.M., Barkay, T., 2006. Novel reduction of mercury(II) by
mercury-sensitive dissimilatory metal reducing bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol.
40, 66906696.
Wiatrowski, H.A., Das, S., Kukkadapu, R., Ilton, E.S., Barkay, T., Yee, N., 2009. Reduction of Hg(II) to Hg(0) by magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 53075313.