JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
DIVISION NINE
JUDGE JUDITH E. McCDONALD-BURKMAN
CASE NO. 15-CI-754
KENTUCKY RESTAURANT PLAINTIFFS
ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
ve ORDER
LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO DEFENDANT
GOVERNMENT
This matter comes before the Court on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
filed by Plaintiffs Kentucky Restaurant Association, Inc. ("KRA"), Kentucky Retail
Federation, Inc. ("KRF"), and Packaging Unlimited, LLC (‘Packaging Unlimited”)
(collectively, “Plaintiffs"). Defendant Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
("Metro Government’) has responded and filed a cross-motion for Judgment on the
Pleadings. A hearing was held June 10, 2015 and the matters are now submitted.
On January 2, 2015, Mayor Greg Fischer approved Ordinance 0-470-14 (“the
Ordinance”), which is to become effective July 1, 2015. The relevant approved language
of the Ordinance reads:
Every Employer within the jurisdictional boundaries of Louisville Metro
shall pay to each of its Employees wages at a rate of not less than $7.75
per hour beginning on July 1, 2015, $8.25 per hour beginning on July 1,
2016, and $9.00 per hour beginning on July 1, 2017
Plaintiffs allege the Ordinance conflicts with Kentucky's minimum wage of $7.25 per
hour set by KRS 337.275(1), and is therefore null and void,
IKRS 337.275(1) adopts the federal minimum wage statute as part of the wage
and hour laws chapter:
Except as may otherwise be provided by this chapter, every employer shall
pay to each of his employees wages at a rate of not less than five dollars
and eighty-five cents ($5.85) an hour beginning on June 26, 2007, not less
than six dollars and fifty-five cents ($6.55) an hour beginning July 1, 2008,
and not less than seven dollars and twenty-five cents ($7.25) an hour
beginning July 1, 2009. If the federal minimum hourly wage as prescribed
by 29 US.C. sec. 206(a)(1) is increased in excess of the minimum hourly
wage in effect under this subsection, the minimum hourly wage under this
subsection shall be increased to the same amount, effective on the same
date as the federal minimum hourly wage rate. If the state minimum
hourly wage is increased to the federal minimum hourly wage, it shall
include only the federal minimum hourly rate prescribed in 29 US. sec.
206(a)(1) and shall not include other wage rates or conditions, exclusions,
or exceptions to the federal minimum hourly wage rate. In addition, the
increase to the federal minimum hourly wage rate does not extend or
modify the scope or coverage of the minimum wage rate required under
this chapter.
This statute establishes a floor for wages; employers may voluntarily pay more, but not
less than the stated minimum wage. The Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets
forth the federal minimum wage, anticipates state and/or local governments adopting
higher minimum wages. 29 USC. § 218(a). KRS 337.275 does not contain express
language authorizing a local government to increase the minimum wage within that
jurisdiction. Neither is there express language reserving the wage and labor laws
exclusively to the General Assembly. “When the legislature seeks to expressly preempt
entire fields of local regulation and ordinance, it does so by clear and unmistakable
language." Lexington Fayette County Food & Beverage Association v. Lexington-Fayette
Urban County Government, 131 S.W.3d 745, 752 (Ky.2004), Such preemptive language
is absent in KRS 337.275.Louisville Metro is a consolidated local government per KRS 67C.101, with “all the
powers and privileges that cities of the first class and their counties are, or may
hereafter be, authorized to exercise under the Constitution and the general laws of the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, including but not limited to those powers granted to cities
of the first class and their counties under their respective home rule powers.” KRS
67C.101(2)(a). The General Assembly granted cities of the first class such as Louisville
broad authority to govern itself, finding conditions in such cities to be “sufficiently
different from those found in other cities to necessitate this grant of authority and
complete home rule,” which is to be construed broadly. KRS 83.410 (emphasis added).
Those “sufficiently different” conditions include economic factors such as cost of living
and economic development and viability
The Ordinance is not in conflict with KRS 337.275. It does not seek to set a
minimum wage lower than that stated in KRS 337.275, nor does it seek to change any
other provision of the wage and labor laws adopted by the General Assembly.
Plaintiffs’ argument that it will be too burdensome to comply with the Ordinance
when the rest of the state is at a different wage rate is without merit. It is no different
than an employer's duty to withhold occupational taxes for its employees, rates which
vary from county to county in Kentucky. An employee may work in different counties as
part of his or her employment, and the employer must calculate the wages earned in
each county to determine the appropriate occupational tax withholding, Additionally,
what is legal in one county may be illegal in another, such as indoor smoking andalcohol and fireworks sales. A business owner must comply with the laws and
ordinances in the various locales in which it chooses to operate, even if variances exist.
Therefore, after a careful review of the record, applicable law and the Court being
otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT Motion
for Judgment on the Pleadings and injunctive Relief filed by Plaintiffs Kentucky
Restaurant Association, Inc, Kentucky Retail Federation, Inc, and Packaging Unlimited,
LLC is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT Defendant
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
iS GRANTED. Louisville Metro Government's Minimum Wage Ordinance is hereby
deemed lawful and enforceable.
This is a final and appealable order there being no just cause for delay.
DITH E. McCDONALD-BURKMAN, JUDGE.
JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT
DATE: 6 ma 7 ea
Distribution to:
Hon. Mike O'Connell, Jefferson County Attorney
Hon, Sarah J. Martin, Asst. Jefferson County Attorney
Hon. Brent R, Baughman
Hon. Aleksandr Litvinow