Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
brand
SUMMER PLACEMENT REPORT
M.ANOOP
Register no: - 30752
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In India, sports ware brands such as Puma, Nike, Addidas, Reebok, Fila etc are popular among
sportswear consumers. Sportswear has become a popular category among young people as it
identifies them with a more relaxed lifestyle, greater versatility and comfort. Many companies,
especially those in the sportswear industry try to enhance brand loyalty among their customers.
Brand loyalty is a consumers conscious or unconscious decision that is expressed through
the
intention
or
behavior
The aim of this research is to study the effect of product quality, brand name, price, store
environment and service quality on brand loyalty in the Bangalore. A sample size of 150
between the age group of 18 to 55 is being selected for the purpose of research. The study can be
helpful in providing useful information to Kalenji brand
branding strategies.
Chapter 1
PROFILE STUDY OF THE
ORGANIZATION
INDUSTRY PROFILE
INTRODUCTION
Sport from games and physical activity to organized competitive sport has an important role
in all societies. For the individuals, it enhances fitness, improves general health and enables a
person to be self-confident. At the national level, sport and physical education contribute to
economic and social growth, improves public health, and bring different communities together. It
is an important component of human capital development. At the global level, sports and
physical education can have a long lasting positive impact on development of poor countries
through various linkages like development of tourism sector. It helps to maintain international
peace and promotes cordial international relations through international sporting events.
Globally, the sports market is one of the most complex and diverse markets in which the
government, federations and private sector are intertwined and all of them play an important role.
In many countries the government is responsible for the development of sports infrastructure. For
instance, in countries like China, Australia and India, development of sports infrastructure is one
of the key responsibilities of the government. Government policies directly or indirectly impact
the development of sports in any country. However, these policies vary from country to country.
In countries like China and Australia sports sector got a boost due to conducive government
policies. For instance in China, the government adopted "Physical Health Law of the People's
Republic of China" in 1995 in which it aimed to build a sport and health-building service system
for the general public. Prior to 1990s, sports sector in China was completely government
funded, however, since then, there has been corporatisation of sports. This has helped in
professionalization of sports and improving sports environment in China. In Australia, the
governments focus on sports development was propelled by Australias poor performance in the
1976 Montreal Olympic Games. The government adopted a policy of Using sport to build
healthy and active communities and commissioned various studies. Despite political resistance,
a governing body called the Australian Institute of Sports (AIS) was established in 1981for
At present, the size of the sports retail market in India is small. There are no clear estimates on
the size of the sports sector alone. However, the sports, equipments, books and entertainment
sector together constituted around 2.7 per cent of the total retail market in 2006-07 while in the
organised retail market its share is around 10 per cent. India has developed as a sports good
sourcing hub and the sports goods industry has been growing at an average annual rate of around
10-12 per cent in the past five years. The focus of the industry has been on exports. However, of
late the sports market in India is growing rapidly with the continued growth of GDP, a young and
educated population, higher disposable income, urbanisation, awareness and exposure to
international markets, the presence of foreign brands, corporate entry into sports, technological
developments, and good performance of the country in some international events. The country is
hosting a series of international sporting events which is likely to boost the industry and increase
sports awareness. Also, sports promotion, training and infrastructure, and exports of sports goods
are now the focus areas of the Indian government.
In India, sports are treated as a recreational and leisure activity. As income increases, expenditure
on recreational and leisure activities also increases. In the recent years, the consumption of food
and basic necessities is declining, while spending on recreational activities is increasing. It is
predicted that recreation consumption in India, which 11 Private labels are own brands of
retailers.
The government wants to develop India as a sourcing hub for sports goods, apparel and footwear.
For this, 100 per cent FDI is allowed in manufacturing of sports product. The focus of the
governments policy in manufacturing is on exports and not on the domestic market. The
government has created special economic zones where manufacturers get various tax exemptions
on export income and easier clearances among others. The sports goods and toys sector has a
special focus in the Foreign Trade Policy (2009-14) and is treated as a priority sector under the
Marketing Development Assistance and the Market Access Initiative schemes. The allocations
for these schemes have been increased. Applications relating to sports goods and toys are given
fast-track clearance by the DGFT (Directorate General of Foreign Trade). There are duty
exemptions on the import of footwear machinery, and concessions have been given to the import
of sports vehicles, such as golf carts for hotels, travel agents and tour operators to promote the
tourism industry in general and golf tourism, in particular. For technological up gradation in the
apparel sector, the EPCG (Export Promotion Capital Goods) scheme offers zero duty for capital
goods imports. To promote modern retail infrastructure, concessional duty benefits under the
EPCG scheme have been extended to the import of capital goods required by retailers that have a
minimum area of 1,000 sq. metres; retailers availing of this scheme will have to fulfil export
obligation criteria.
Apart from these, the Foreign Trade Policy emphasised on the promotion of Indian brands in
international markets, simplification of the procedures for imports/exports, improvements in
infrastructure related to exports, and reduction in transaction costs. When the Indian exporters
were hit by the global slowdown, government announced stimulus packages to revive the sector.
The retail sector in India has received a shot in the arm by the Indian Governments recent policy
decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) of up to 51% in multibrand retail and upto
100% in single brand retail. Given that 95% of the sector constitutes unorganized retail
consisting largely of mom and pop stores, the Government have treaded cautiously by building
adequate safeguards for the domestic stakeholders in the unorganized sector. Foreign investments
in retail will have to go through Government approval first. The policy mandates a minimum
investment of $100 Mn with at least half the amount be invested in back-end infrastructure,
including cold chains, refrigeration, transportation, storage, packaging etc. Further, foreign
retailers will have to source a minimum 30% from the Indian small and micro industry. Another
key policy initiative to safeguard small/unorganized sector retailers is that FDI is being allowed
only in 53 cities having a population of over 1Mn out of nearly 8000 cities/towns in India.
Finally in Indias federal structure, retail trade is a state level regulation and it will be up to the
states to allow foreign participation in the respective 53 cities within their states.
COMPETITOR ANALYSIS
Competitors of Decathlon Sports India Private Limited are:
All the Sports company in India especially the International sports brands are the major
competitors of Decathlon Sports India Private Limited. Some of them are:
NIKE
ADIDAS
FILA
PUMA
REEBOK
KITBAG
EARLY WINTER
JD SPORTS
COMPANY PROFILE
PRODUCT LINES
The chain develops and sells its own brands. Each group of activities has a separate brand name:
B'TWIN - Cycling
CAPERLAN - Fishing
FLX - Cricket
INESIS - Golf
KALENJI - Running
NABAIJI - Swimming
NEWFEEL - Walking
SIMOND - Mountaineering
SOLOGNAC - Hunting
Decathlon has also developed brands for components which provide technical support for the
products of its passion brands:
At Decathlon we love sports, all sports and all those who play and practice sports. We offer sports
enthusiasts products and solutions to each of their level, their rhythms and their demands.
We believe that the pleasure and benefits of sports contribute to the good health, balanced education,
social integration and sustainable development the world over. In India it is our aim to do our best to
help more and more Indians play more by paying less for their sports equipment
Vision Statement
Mission statement
To provide sports products and facilities with high quality but low prices.
.Departments
Production Department
Operations Department
Logistic Department
Finance Department
IT Department
Turnover
International 55.4%
France - 44.6%
SWOT Analysis
Strength
1. Stores located throughout the world with 800 stores all over
2. Group is largest sporting goods reseller in domestic market
3. Large variety of sports goods in affordable pricing for all classes of consumers
4. Own private label brands to get high brand recall
5. Strong and innovative marketing since years have created a strong brand retention in the
minds of customers.
Weakness
1. Limited global presence as compared to leading global companies
2. E- retailing is gaining importance but still company has limited presence on the same
Opportunities
1. Brand building by tie-up with emerging clubs/teams/players
2. Company has opportunity to innovate on technology front to design new products
3. Creating high brand awareness by exploring advertising media tactically
Threats
1. High inflation doesn't give opportunity of cost advantage in competitive environment
2.High competition from global and domestic players
3.Threats from other brands who provide goods at lower price
Section-II
Problem Centered Study
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Now a day the trend of brand switching among sportswear consumers is increasing due to the
increasing number of competitors or alternatives. The study aiming to identify what are the
factors that makes the customer sticks on to a particular sportswear brand. For that, five factors
of brand loyalty which seems to be important in the Indian market has been taken. The focus
of this study is to examine the relationship exists between the variables (Product
quality, Price, Brand name, Store environment, and Service quality and brand loyalty).
Competition in the sportswear market is very much increasing today because of the increasing
number of competitors or alternatives. It resulted in rising trend of brand switching among
consumers. So it is important for the marketers to get more information about the factors that
affect brand loyalty, so that it could help them to develop brand loyal behavior among their
potential customers. As such from the study we can
based
brand
strategies
on
the
effect
of
above
Product
Chapter-2
RESEARCH PROCESS
Hypothesis
This study focuses on the factors that influencing consumers brand loyalty towards Kalenji
brand. Based on the factors that influence brand loyalty, the following hypotheses are derived.
H1: Product quality has a significant effect on brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand .
H2: Brand name has a significant effect on brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand .
H3: Price has a significant effect on brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand .
H4: Store environment has a significant effect on brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand .
H5: Service quality has a effect on brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand .
: JUNE-JULY 2013
Place : BANGALORE
RESEARCH DESIGN
The research design is survey type and the nature of the study is descriptive.
Population
Data collection
questionnaire.
Tool for data collection
The
developed
to indicate respondents
degree of
SAMPLING DESIGN
Sampling method
Sampling Unit
Sample size
150
CHAPTER-3
ANALYSIS AND
INTERPRETATION
Type of Respondents
Male
Number
Respondents
83
of Percentage
Female
67
45%
Total
150
100
55%
Gender
Female; 45%
Male; 55%
Inference: it is clear from above figure that majority of respondents were male which
contributed 55% and females 45%. The reasons for the difference may be either the males are
more passionate towards sportswear brands and there willingness to fill the questionnaire was
much more than females who were mostly concentrated on shopping activity.
S. NO.
AGE
01
18-25
FREQUENCY PERCENTAG
E
66
44
02
26-35
49
32
03
36-45
19
13
04
46-55
16
11
150
100
Total
AGE
46-55; 11%
36-45; 13%
18-25; 44%
26-35; 33%
Inference: It is clear from above figure that majority of respondents fall in the age group of 1825 i.e. 44%, 32.0% falls in the age group of 26-35, 13.0% falls in the age group of 36-45 and
11.0% falls under the age group of 46-55.
S.NO.
Occupation
Frequency
01
Student
45
PERCENTAG
E
38
02
professional
57
30
03
self-employed
16
11
04
others
32
21
150
100
Total
occupation
others; 21%
Student
professional; 38%
; 30%
Inference: From the above graph, it is identified that professionals are more brand loyal to
Kalenji. It is clearly evident that Kalenji has lot of products especially designed for people who
are approaching sports professionally. At the same time it demands a greater concern that the
presence of students right behind professionals with 30%.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
38
25
02
Agree
64
43
03
Neutral
27
18
04
Disagree
15
10
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
strongly Disagree
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 25.0% of respondents Strongly agree, 43.0%
agree and 18.0 % are neutral in the opinion that they are concerned about the durability of the
brand.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
25
02
Agree
61
41
03
Neutral
35
23
04
Disagree
21
14
05
Strongly disagree
17
150
100
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 36.0% of respondents Strongly agree, 50.0%
agree ,23.0 % are neutal,14.0% disagree and 17.0% strongly disagree .
TABLE 6: THE
COMFORTABLE
MATERIALS
USED
BY
THE
BRAND
ARE
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
65
43
02
Agree
55
37
03
Neutral
18
12
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference:It is clear from the above Figure that 43.0% of respondents Strongly agree, 37.0%
agree and 12.0 % are neutral ,5% disagree and 3 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
70
46
02
Agree
45
30
03
Neutral
25
16
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
24
16
02
Agree
35
23
03
Neutral
61
41
04
Disagree
18
12
05
Strongly disagree
12
150
100
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
D
is
ag
re
e
st
ro
ng
ly
D
is
ag
re
e
Ag
re
e
eu
tr
al
N
st
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
Inference:It is clear from the above Figure that .46% of respondents Strongly agree, 30.0%
agree and 16.0 % are neutral, 5% disagree , and 3% strongly disagree .
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference : It is clear from the above Figure that 20% of respondents Strongly agree, 36% agree
and 31 % are neutral ,10 % disagree and 3 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
67
44
02
Agree
43
29
03
Neutral
28
19
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
D
is
ag
re
e
st
ro
ng
ly
D
is
ag
re
e
Ag
re
e
eu
tr
al
N
st
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 44% of respondents Strongly agree, 29% agree
and 19 % are neutral,6 % disagree and 2 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
32
21
02
Agree
58
39
03
Neutral
35
23
04
Disagree
17
12
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
60
40
02
Agree
53
35
03
Neutral
21
14
04
Disagree
10
05
Strongly disagree 6
TOTAL
150
4
100
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 21% of respondents Strongly agree, 39% agree
and 23 % neutral,12 % disagree, 5 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
45
30
02
Agree
62
41
03
Neutral
28
19
04
Disagree
10
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that40 % of respondents Strongly agree, 35% agree
and 14.0 % are neutral, 5 % disagree, 4% strongly disagree.
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 30% of respondents Strongly agree, 41% agree
and 19% neutral, 7 % disagree, 3% strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
18
12
02
Agree
31
21
03
Neutral
54
36
04
Disagree
32
21
05
Strongly disagree
15
10
150
100
TOTAL
60
50
40
30
20
10
st
ro
ng
ly
D
is
ag
re
e
D
is
ag
re
e
Ag
re
e
eu
tr
al
N
st
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 12% of respondents Strongly agree, 21% agree
and 36 % neutral are 21 % disagree, 10% strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
39
26
02
Agree
58
38
03
Neutral
22
15
04
Disagree
19
13
05
Strongly disagree 12
18
TOTAL
150
100
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 26% of respondents Strongly agree, 38% agree
and 15 % neutral, 13% disagree, 18 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
83
56
02
Agree
44
29
03
Neutral
14
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
D
is
ag
re
e
st
ro
ng
ly
D
is
ag
re
e
Ag
re
e
eu
tr
al
N
st
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
Inference:It is clear from the above Figure that 56% of respondents Strongly agree,29 % agree,9
% are neutral, 4 % are disagree and 2% strongly disagree .
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
69
46
02
Agree
51
34
03
Neutral
18
12
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference:It is clear from the above Figure that46 % of respondents Strongly agree, 34% agree
and 12 % are neutral, 6% disagree and 2 % strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
60
40
02
Agree
47
31
03
Neutral
23
16
04
Disagree
12
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 40% of respondents Strongly agree, 31% agree
and 16 % are neutral, 8 % disagree, 5 % strongly disagree.
TABLE 18 : SALESPERSONS
APPEARANCE
OF THE
STORES
HAVE
NEAT
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
88
59
02
Agree
42
28
03
Neutral
13
04
Disagree
05
Strongly disagree
150
100
TOTAL
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that59 % of respondents Strongly agree, 28% agree
and 9 % are neutral,3 % disagree, 1 % strongly disagree .
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
28
19
02
Agree
41
27
03
Neutral
50
33
04
Disagree
18
12
05
Strongly disagree
13
150
100
TOTAL
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 19% of respondents Strongly agree, 27% agree
and 33 % are neutral, 12 % disagree and 9 % strongly disagree .
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
31
21
02
Agree
53
35
03
Neutral
42
28
04
Disagree
14
05
Strongly disagree
10
150
100
TOTAL
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
35
23
02
Agree
48
32
03
Neutral
39
26
04
Disagree
17
12
05
Strongly disagree
11
150
100
TOTAL
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference:It is clear from the above Figure that 21% of respondents Strongly agree, 35% agree
and 28% are neutral, 9 % disagree and7% strongly disagree.
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 23 of respondents Strongly agree, 32% agree ,
26% are neutral,12 % disagree ,7 %strongly disagree.
S.NO.
DEGREE
OF FREQUENCY
AGREEMENT
PERCENTAG
E
01
Strongly agree
20
13
02
Agree
33
22
03
Neutral
52
35
04
Disagree
27
18
05
Strongly disagree
18
12
150
100
TOTAL
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
strongly Disagree
Inference: It is clear from the above Figure that 13% of respondents Strongly agree, 22%
agree, 35 % are neutral , 18 % disagree,12 % strongly disagree.
Chapter IV
Findings & Conclusion
FINDINGS
The overall result shows that all the factors that have been taken for study are
important for the brand loyalty towards Kalenji Brand.
In those factors price, product quality, store environment and service quality are
the factors which are most crucial.
It is revealed that Brand name is the factor which is less influencing on the brand
loyalty towards kalenji. Because this brand name is not so popular among Indian
customers.
The study identifies that Males are more brand loyal than females regarding the
brand loyalty towards a sportswear brand like Kalenji.
It also came in to day light that sports professionals recognizing Kalenji brand and
they are more brand loyal towards Kalenji.
Youngsters especially students are becoming more brand loyal towards Kalenji
brand.
CONCLUSION
From the study it is understood that Price, Product quality and Store environment are the most
crucial factors that makes the customer Brand loyal to Kalenji Brand. Because Kalenji is a new
brand to India, brand name doesnt have that much effect on brand loyalty. The brands design
and functional quality makes sport professional love the brand. At the same time, what more
hopeful for the brand is that students are getting very much attracted to the brand now. This
opens a great market for the brand. So Kalenji, one of the most popular sportswear brands in
western countries can repeat the history in India also by focusing on these factors. After an year
or two the brand also can make its own influence on the brand loyalty towards Kalenji brand.
SUGGESTION
As it was found that product quality, price, store environment and service quality are the
crucial factors of brand acceptance so they should focus more on these factors to retain
their acceptance among the Indian customers.
The time period was limited to two months. Extension of the time period will
allow the researcher to go more deeply in to the research.
The study was limited to the city of Bangalore. If it was done with in a region as a
whole like southern region of India, northern India the study can come out with
more interesting results.
BIBLIOGRAPH
Marketing Management, Philip kotler
Marketing Research- An Applied Orientation ,Naresh k. Malhotra, Satyabhushan Dash
Quality and Competitiveness in a Global Environment, Russell, R. S. and Taylor.
Consumers True Brand Loyalty: The Central Role of Commitment. Journal of Strategic
Marketing, Amine. A.
Foong
Yee
ConsumerSportswear
and
Yahya
Sidek.
-Influence
of
Brand
Loyalty
on