Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I.
INTRODUCTION
+
AC
Input
vc1(t)
_
G1
SW1
G2
+
vc2(t)
SW2
D2 _
vin(t)
_
Cout1
Charge
balancing
downstream
Stage/Load
Cout2
vout(t)
_
H1
H1
H1
Cmp2
Rsiline
iin(t)
vi_ref[n]
G1
G2
Mode
Selector
ei[n]
Windowed
ADC2
Level shifter
Cmp1
1-bit
Kn/Re[n]
DPWM
d[n]
Voltage loop
compensator
Current loop
compensator
ev[n]
Digital controller
Windowed
ADC1
Vref
1030
To minimize the inductance volume, the introduced nonsymmetric multi-level boost (NSMB) converter functions on
the same principle as other multi-level solutions. It utilizes the
fact that reducing the voltage variation across the boost
inductor reduces the inductor size as well. To lower the
variation, instead of changing the switching node (vx(t) of
Fig.1) between 0 and full output voltage value, like in the
conventional boost case, the voltage swing of vx(t) is varied
depending on the instantaneous rectified input voltage value
vin(t). The swing variation is performed through the active
capacitive divider network, such that the condition for the
proper boost operation, i.e. vx_max > vin(t), is always satisfied,
where vx_max is the maximum value of the switching node
voltage.
The relation between the inductor value L and its
maximum voltage swing Vswing, which for the conventional
buck is equal to the output voltage Vout, can be analyzed
through the following equation for the maximum inductor
current ripple [5]:
I rip p le,max
Vswin g
4L
1
,
f sw
(1)
which occurs for D = 0.5, where D is the duty ratio and fsw
is the switching frequency of the converter. It can be seen that
the maximum ripple, which determines the inductor size, is
linearly proportional to Vswing, and that by minimizing this
value the inductor can be reduced as well, while maintaining
the same current ripple.
To minimize the inductor, in the converter of Fig.1, an
active capacitive divider replaces the output capacitor of the
conventional boost. The divider limits the maximum inductor
voltage swing value to Vout/3 while maintaining the maximum
value of the switching node voltage larger than vin(t) at all
Mode 1
iin(t)
vin(t)
vx(t)
D1
Dis-charge
+
Charge
vc1(t)
SW1
2Vout/3
vin(t)
SW2
vc2(t)
+
Cout2
Vout/3
Tline/2
2Vout/3
Vout/3
0
+
Cout1
D2
Fig.2: Operation of the NSMB converter for vin(t) < Vout/3 (mode 1).
Mode 2
iin
Dis-charge
vin(t)
vx(t)
D1
Charge
vc1(t)
SW1
2Vout/3
vin(t)
Vout/3
_
0
Cout1
+
vc2(t)
SW2
+
2Vout/3
_
+
Cout2
Vout/3
Tline/2
D2
Fig.3: Operation of the NSMB converter for Vout/3 < vin(t) < 2Vout/3
(mode 2).
1031
iin
Mode 3
Dis-charge
vin(t)
vx(t)
D1
Charge
vc1(t)
SW1
2Vout/3
vin(t)
_
0
vc2(t)
SW2
2Vout/3
Vout/3
Cout1
Cout2
Vout/3
Tline/2
D2
+
vout(t)
_
_ i2
vc2(t)
NSMB
Converter
+
D3
vc1(t)
_
vc2(t)
SW2
SW1
n2
n1
SW2
D4
1032
Cout
vout(t)
_
D1
i2
L1
2n2 n3
2n1
load
Cout
SW1
D2
i1
2n 1
load
NSMB
Converter
III.
D1
i1
+
vc1(t)
Table I. Comparison of switching and conduction losses of the proposed converter compared to the conventional boost
Mode
Mode 1
Mode 2
Mode 3
Inductor state
Charge
Dis-Charge
Charge
Dis-Charge
Charge
Dis-Charge
L/3, SW1, D2
L/3, SW1, D2
L/3, D1, D2
L, SW1, SW2
L, D1, D2
L, SW1, SW2
L, D1, D2
L, SW1, SW2
L, D1, D2
SW2, D2
SW2, D2
Same
Vx
Vin 220Vrms
C. Comparison of Losses
IL
6.a)
Vsense
Mode 1
Mode 2
Mode 3
400V
Mode 2
Mode 1
Vswing
Vx
Vc2 Vc1
Vswing
Vswing
Vin 220Vrms
IL
6.b)
1033
[6]
[7]
[8]
98
96
[9]
Efficiency (%)
94
92
90
[10]
88
86
[11]
84
Boost
NSMB
82
80
0
100
200
300
Output Power (W)
400
[12]
500
[13]
V.
CONCLUSIONS
A PFC rectifier based on a novel digitally-controlled nonsymmetric multi-level boost converter (NSMB) converter that
requires three times smaller inductor and has lower losses than
the conventional boost based solution is introduced. The
NSMB is a modified version of the three-level boost topology.
Instead of maintaining the same voltages across the output
divider capacitors, in this system, they are regulated at 1/3 and
2/3 of the full output level. This modification allows for a
further reduction of the inductor voltage swing and,
consequently, its minimization. To regulate the centre-tap
voltage, input current of a two-input low-volume downstream
converter stage is utilized. Experimental comparisons with a
conventional PFC verify advantages of the new system.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
REFERENCES
[1]
[14]
1034