Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
AUGUST 1967
IEEE,
IEEE
INTRODUCTION
HE ELECTRICAL strength of air and exposed porcelain
insulation systems is affected by variations in barometric
pressure, temperature, and humidity. To assure a desired withstand voltage in service, the critical flashover voltage (CFO) obtained for standard sea level conditions must be increased by
correction factors pertinent to the service conditions. The influence of these factors exerts a profound effect on transmission
line economics, as has been evidenced on lines designed for highaltitude application.1E1
The degree to which correction factors can influence design
requirements is illustrated by the following equation:
CFOstandard = withstandservice X K1 X K2 X K3 X K4 X K5
conditions
conditions
where
Paper 31 TP 66-511, recommended and approved by the Transmission and Distribution Committee of the IEEE Power Group for
presentation at the IEEE Summer Power Meeting, New Orleans,
La., July 10-15, 1966. Manuscript received June 15, 1966; made
available for publication March 21, 1967.
T. A. Phillips is with the Arizona Public Service Company,
Phoenix, Ariz.
L. M. Robertson is with the Public Service Company of Colorado,
Denver, Col.
A. F. Rohlfs and R. L. Thompson are with the General Electric
Company, Pittsfield, Mass., and Schenectady, N. Y., respectively.
Test Sites
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
949
(a)
(b)
(b)
Fig. 2. Leadville, waveshapes: (a) impulse wave 2 X 45 js;
(b) switching surge wave 260 X 3600 ,us.
field in the summer and fall of 1965. Winter tests of these same
configurations were conducted at Pittsfield in early 1966 to investigate whether temperature has an effect in addition to that
accounted for by the relative air density. Tests of configurations
4 and 5 were conducted at Leadville and during the winter test
series at Pittsfield.
Scope of Tests
The flashover strength of transmission line insulation is substantially influenced by the mass of the tower and by the proximity of the insulation to the structural members of the tower.
Because of these mass and proximity effects it would have been
necessary to examine a range of tower designs at both Leadville
and Pittsfield. The expense and time involved in such a program
led to a decision to test basic configurations representing boundary conditions which would encompass most tower designs.
These tests were intended to determine the effect of air density
independent of specific tower designs, that is, to define relationships which would permit the use of existing full-scale tower test
data for high-altitude applications.
Tcst Configurations
Three basic test configurations were selected to include the
following variables:
1) length of insulator assembly
2) length of air gap
3) influence of nearby ground plane
4) wet and dry conditions
5) switching surge and impulse waveshapes.
Configuration 1, shown in Fig. 4, represents a suspension insulator string with a minimum proximity effect. Configuration 3,
shown in Fig. 6, represents a suspension insulator string with a
large proximity effect caused by the ground plane. Configuration
2, shown in Fig. 5, provides a comparison of air vs. porcelain
and represents a moderate proximity effect. In addition, cap and
pin substation insulator assemblies were tested placed directly on
the ground (configuration 4) and on an 8-foot pedestal (configuration 5) shown in Fig. 7.
A range of insulation lengths typical of 230- to 500-kV designs
was tested for configurations 1, 2, and 3 at Leadville and Pitts-
Test Runs
Each test run consisted of a critical flashover determination
using 20 shots per level. The voltage levels were changed in
approximately four percent steps until at the lowest level there
were not more than five flashovers and at the highest level there
were not less than 15 flashovers.
950
AUGUST 1967
ENSION CONDUCTOR
CH CABLE BLOCK
-x 10 SUSPENSION INSULATOR
UNDER TEST
LOAD I
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
DATA ANALYSIS
1.16
'E 1.12
Z 1.
8
:r
-o
0.2
0.
VAPOR PRESSURE
'HG
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
barometer
f)
dry bulb temperature g)
wet bulb temperature h)
sun
rain
951
i)
g)
snow
fog
wind
dew
frost.
Humidity Correction
The test data were corrected for humidity in accordance with
the curves shown in Fig. 11. For impulse voltages, the standard
correction curves from ASA C68.1, curves B and C were used.
However, for switching-surge voltages these standard corrections
have been found to be too large. Curve A represents a humidity
correction curve developed by General Electric High Voltage
Laboratory from recent flashover test programs. This curve is the
best available at the moment but may require further refinement.
Wet Testing Procedure
The wet tests were made using a precipitation rate of 0.2 inches
per minute. In the case of configuration 1 the rain spray header
was supported in a horizontal position above the insulators and
the spray nozzles were directed so that the spray would be distributed over the length of the insulator string. For configuration
2, the header was placed in a vertical position and the nozzles
were directed so that the spray would cover the gap. Because of
breezes the spray could not be controlled as well as in an indoor
test facility and consequently the test results might be more
erratic.
The water available at Leadville had low resistivity. Therefore, it was processed through a demineralizer, brought up to a
high resistivity, and then mixed with the local unprocessed water
to achieve a resistivity of 18 000 to 22 000 ohm centimeters. At
Pittsfield the resistivity of the water was 22 000 ohm centimeters.
952
AUGUST
cOO
___
1[
/.71
172-
-,-
.73
1601
y99/
A02
.75
/.7
100
20
8o0o
/ .2
40
POS.
(I2C
PQs.
RoE
POS.
----W
M24EG.
0
1O
20
+ POS.
--_-_-___
xMNEG.
LEADVILLE TESTS
YPOS.
_ jNEG.
----0
4.0
30
NO. OF UNITS
401
NEG.
400
101
1.01
LEADVILLE TESTS
7
0S
10
o0
40
30
20
NO. OF UNITS
20
40
30
NO OF UNITS
2400
2001
1600
-00
Fig. 13.Cofiuraio1swt1.10
-,surge Sooy.
;6Cc1-
1967
___-
- _ __ _ -
2000
.72
///
>--
--
12061600.1
lOS'
.72-WET-
1600
!Pl
Il 0o T4
50
1#//J +1.1 1
.71
.73
~~I2D
- ___
~ 1.04
f-
.7-W
.~~~672-WET
L~~~.J
99/
.7
9DRY
//
/0 /
NEG.
WET
9 POsD
/
- '1
I06
.06
0
ffl
POS.
MEG.
10
____+
L4
POS.
LEADVILLE TESTS
--
16
0D
U,
1b
12
.7 I
, |2
THESE CURvtb wtKt
EjDRAWN TO APPROXI/
/THE SHAPE OFIMATE
/
I I |
Xl
t THE CURVES FOR
J
/
+1.08 CONFIGURATION 3
/
|___xNG
1000
II
LOl I
>
I/
--
lo
20
NO. OF UNITS
400-
41b
dry.
4II1
{st./
II'tZ
__
POS.
LEADVILLE TESTS
4 /
/-
07,
/.7
// .,74
j0 POS.
NG OF UNITS
12
'
~~~LEADVILLE
---
16
1.0
MEL
|---@.0
| ^t
4
60.
---~~~~~~
N EG.
/,
N EG.
30
L_____
1.071
>1
0)
1.03
FIGURES 176a10
~~~~~SEE
/'-
2~~~~
1600 ----
0
3
9
41,
161.07
1600
- 1
N EG.
NO. OF UNITS
200--0
1600 -
POs&
M EG.
2400-
NE
POD
MEG
NMEG.
2400
.
031___
x NEG.04
LT
.72
.0
LEADVILLE TESTS
---0
l//
~~~~+POS.
/
6/
72
400
//I
.064 1.05/
12DC
--
/~~
600
>160
11lW
1e200
PO0.
MEG.
TESTS
POE.
MEG.
12
16
NO. OF UNITS
dry.
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
20 O17
1) .06
LLiA41:i
20
ID
IS
1001.04I
4-
.74
v 74
II1600
Im.72
.072
/-10
1I.'I-'--1.06
_;;
,:; I:1200
12001
--
_ -
155
-L
1.04
-
.2
l--i
P-3
A72p
.2
____
__
NEG.
400
LEADVILLE TESTS
&
-i0POS.
-
20
DEP
LEADVILLE TESTS
40
1.086,
___
O,
NO OF UNITS
RAW
1.07+
--__
~+ p5S.
D___ x NEE.
LEADVILLE TESTS
_ t * POS.
~-- --N DEE.
X--.20
30
12
---~
f, t/
A//
ooo
-
4010
72
f POS.
* PUS.
a NEG.
30
41.
---Na NEG.
NO. OF UNITS
hA
vu
I8
LD
161
1E00
:x
12
0
953
60,____25 UNITS
__
14001
I9-1
0
.D
___
20N~
1200
l--
1000
PITTSFIELD WINTER TESTS
400C
60
40
20 l
NO. OF UNITS
30
40
___0
__
RAW
I.E
1.1
117
RAD
L5
RAW
__
I600
>
Uas
1600
RAD
0.9
t00
25
CORR. FOR H
25 UNITS
21
UNITS
31
1400
40C
1-
12001 ___
1000
I_
RO
32'
~ ~9,
1063
Boool
600
6001
__
25e
R.U
U.9
0D
RAD
0.7k7
19
surge,
dry
1.1I I-R.
414
26
54!
53.
45.
--
25
2T
__+_
600. -- _
40
35-
41
1200
154'
1E8
RADuD
nq
nR
uAS
u. 7
1.2
1.1
1.0
RAD
0.9
a8
surge,
5'
0.7
dry
954
CONFIGURATION I
II
1.0
VO.7
V1.
V0.7
V1.0 0.1
RDDY
U.7
PUS. DR
PS
078
0.7
POS. DRY
NEG. IIET
impOPot
INEG. DRY
10
l.t
V0.7
u.
CONFIGURATION 2
IO
30
20
NO. OF UNITS
1.1
V1.0 0.0
S P
A0
30
NO. OF UNITS
CONFIGURATIONS 4 DiS
SWITCHING SURGE
r---IIMPULSE
n e-
1967
CONFIGURATION 3
SWITCHING SURGE
- IMPULSE
AUGUST
NEG.DRY
VO.7
,POS. DRY
'POS. WET
V I.0
CONFIGURATION
S. S.
0.8
POS.
DRY
DRYICONFIGUR TION 5
S. S. PO
Po. DRY
IPOS. DRY
v.v0
0.7
10
0.6
.-V
15
NO. OF UNITS
results show good agreement with the results for line insulation.
an insulation length equivalent to 25 suspension units, the
At
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
TRANSMISSION
955
LINE INSULATION
TABLE I
Proximity
small
moderate
3
4
5
large
large
moderate
Wet
or
Dry
dry
wet
dry
wet
dry
dry
dry
Positive Polarity
Insulation Length, * units
15
20
10
0.68
0.70
(0.59)t
0.68
0.69
0.74
0.80
0.73
0.74
0.75
0.72
0.68
0.74
25
10
0.72
0.65
0.70
0.72
0.67
0.71
0.75
0.68
0.72
0.78
0.88
0.89
0.91
0.79
0.75
0.71
0.76
0.83
0.81
0.81
0.83
0.77
0.76
Negative Polarity
Insulation Length,* units
15
20
25
0.93
* Insulation length is expressed in terms of an equivalent number of suspension insulator units for all configurations:
15
20
25
Suspension units 10
Air gap, ft
5
7.5 10
12.5
6
8
10
Cap and pin units 4
TABLE II
V0-7/V1l0 RATIOS-IMPULSE
Wet
Positive Polarity,
Insulation Length,* units
Configuration
Proximity
Dry
10
16
1
2
3
small
moderate
dry
dry
dry
0.72
0.69
0.75
0.69
large
or
20
10
0.76
0.72
0.68
0.92
0.73
Negative Polarity,
Insulation Length,* units
16
20
0.72
25
0.72
1.00
1.07
* Insulation length is expressed in terms of an equivalent number of suspension insulator units for all configurations:
16
20
25
Suspension units 10
5
8
10
12.5
Air gap, ft
TABLE III
SWITCHING SURGE STANDARD DEVIATIONS
no
Config-
uration Location
I
Leadville
1
Pittsfield
Leadville
Pittsfield
Leadville
Pittsfield
4
4
Leadville
Pittsfield
Leadville
Pittsfield
956
The relationship of the standard deviations for various conditions were studied by means of the Student's t-tests. This is a
statistical comparison method which determines for a specified
level of confidence whether the means (in this case the average
standard deviations) of two distributions are equlal or different.
The results of these comparisons are summarized in Table IV.
Where the averages were not found to be equal, the mean difference and the 95 percent confidence interval estimate of the difference in the averages are shown.
Referring to Table IV, it can be seen that no significant difference was found in the standard deviations under wet and dry
conditions. For this reason, wet and dry results were not shown
separately in Table III. The standard deviation is greater for
positive polarity than for negative polarity for all configurations
except configuration 3, in which the relationship is reversed.
For configuration 3, the negative polarity standard deviation can
be assumed with 95 percent confidence to be at least two percent
different from the positive polarity standard deviation. It is of
interest that for negative polarity this configuration displayed a
significantly smaller air density effect than for positive polarity or
other configurations, thus indicating a basic difference in the
mechanism of flashover.
The standard deviations at Leadville and Pittsfield were compared for positive polarity and for negative polarity with and
without configuration 3 data. In all cases the standard deviation
at Leadville was smaller than at Pittsfield. For positive polarity,
the mean difference between the Leadville and Pittsfield standard
deviations was 1.4 percent, and for negative polarity the mean
difference was 2.6 percent. When the large negative polarity
standard deviations obtained for configuration 3 at Pittsfield are
eliminated from the comparison, the mean difference for nega-
AUGUST
1967
TABLE IV
t-TEST COMPARISONS OF SWITCHING SURGE STANDARD DEVIATIONS
Standard Deviations
Compared
Wet vs. dry-positive polarity
Configuration 1 and 2
Wet vs. dry-negative polarity
Configuration 1 and 2
Positive polarity vs. negative polarity
Configuration 1, 2, 4, 5
Positive polarity vs. negative polarity
Configuration 3
Leadville vs. Pittsfield
Positive polarity
Configuration 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Leadville vs. Pittsfield
Negative polarity
Configuration 1, 2, 3, 5
Leadville vs. Pittsfield
Negative polaritv
Configuration 1, 2, 5
Configuration 1 vs. 2
Positive polarity
Configuration 1 vs. 2
Negative polarity
Configuration 1 vs. 3
Positive polarity
Configuration 1 vs. 3
Result of t-test
Comparison
Mean
Difference
o-wet
adry
orwet
ordry
1.9
1.2 - 2.6
crpos. <crneg.
3.6
1.9
orLead.
< oaPitts.
1.4
0.5 -#2.3
2.6
0.9
cPitts.
1.1
0.3 - 2.0
1.8
0.44
3.1
0.1
2.2
6.7
o-Lead. <
l Kr2
<
ar1
a
<
cr2
1.1
I=
cr3
5.3
4.2
Negative polarity
cr1
<
cr3
5.0
3.2
Configuration 2 vs. 3
Positive polarity
cr2
> 3
2.0
0.8 -3.2
3.8
1.7
Configturation 2 vs. 3
Negative polarity
6.0
957
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
Summary
5.0 percent
7.5 percent
3.0 percent
.0
2.0 percent
5.0 percent
2.0 percent
Config-
TABLE V
TABLE VI
uration
Location
Leadvile
Pittsfield
Leadville
Pittsfield
Leadville
Pittsfield
1.7-2.2
0.8-2.2
1.7-3.1
1.2-3.2
1.4-2.1
2.2-2.3
1.6-3.4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
8
2.0
1.5
2.4
2.2
1.8
2.3
2.5
1.6
3.1
2.5
1.3
5.8
2.9-3.2
1.0-3.9
1.0-2.0
3.1-10.0
25
2.0
0.8-3.9
1.6-1.6
Test Configuration
Leadville,
kV
960
4
5
2
1000
1140
1240
Single stringt
no corona rings
with corona rings
Air gap
conductor to leg or truss
conductor to guy wire
Pittsfield,
kV
1165 fall
1220 winter
1250
1500
1520 fall
1550 winter
1280
1160
1360
1300
1290
1550
958
CONCLUSIONS
Switching Surge
1) The following air density correction factors are applicable
to transmission line design:
Insulator or
Air Gap Length, ft
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
Correction
Factor
(RAD)' 0
(RAD) 9
(RAD)0.8
(RAD)0.7
2) Air density correction is the same for wet and dry conditions.
3) Air density correction is approximately the same for air gaps
and insulators.
4) Air density effect decreases with increasing length and increasing proximity of insulation to ground planes.
5) Negative polarity switching surges produce higher flashover
voltages than positive polarity. Therefore, positive polarity
switching surges determine the criteria to be followed in designing
transmission line insulation.
6) There seems to be a slight temperature effect that is independent of RAD. However, this effect is small and will need to
be investigated further for verification.
7) The use of a humidity correction improved the correlation
of the CFO data with RAD. Therefore, it is concluded that it is
valid to use a humidity correction.
8) A standard deviation of five percent is applicable to transmission line design.
9) The standard deviation of CFO voltages is essentially independent of proximity on positive polarity. On negative polarity
it increases with large proximity effects.
10) The standard deviation of CFO voltages is smaller at high
altitude than at low altitude.
Impulse
The air density correction that should be used for transmission line design for impulse waves is (RAD) 1.0 and the standard deviation is 2.0 percent of the CFO voltage.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution made by T.
Brownlee of the General Electric Company in supervising the
Leadville portion of the program and the support he received
from P. K. Jones of Public Service Company of Colorado and J.
P. Benedict of the General Electric Company. The Pittsfield tests
were supervised by F. J. Turner and performed by L. W. Graham
and T. W. Armstrong of the General Electric Company. The
ingenuity of these people in coping with problems in the field and
their close attention to details contributed much to the success
of the program.
AUGUST 1967
REFERENCES
Discussion
A. E. Kilgour (Allis-Chalmers, Milwaukee, Wis.): This paper holds
considerable interest and the authors are to be commended for their
fine presentation. It is encouraging that the comparative information
presented is in generally close agreement. The explanations, procedures, and graphic display will certainly be of value for future
design and operational purposes.
Several questions have been generated from reading this work.
1) Regarding ground resistivity: we appreciate the elimination
of as many variables as possible for some testing, but were differences
found in ground resistivity and what effect would the authors expect
the ground resistivity to have on the results obtained?
2) The details of factors effecting the variance between CFO and
CWS seem to add to the complexity. Practical applications are that
the relationship between CFO and CWS be weighed with a good
confidence level but without excessive margins of safety so as to
prevent an economic burden. Therefore, which factors do the
authors feel to be most significant?
3) The paper states the General Electric Company's method of
variance was used in place of existing standards. What are the
merits of the G.E. method? What efforts are being made to incorporate them into the standards now under discussion for revision
and updating?
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
959
withJstand level.
1966.
240 ps.
pressure variations.
While the use of full RAD correction for low altitude designs[4]
does not incur a significant economic penalty, the use of full RAD in
comparison to (RAD)0-6 as suggested by the authors would require
about three additional insulators for 500-kV lines at 10 000 feet.
Thus the application of these data will be of economic benefit to
utilities with EHV lines in mountainous regions.
Using the authors' data in Table I, Fig. 30 has been prepared to
illustrate the variation of n of the expression (RAD)n as a function of
the equivalent number of suspensioin insulators. The dotted line shows
the authors' suggestions as given in the conclusioin and is a good
practical estimate of the factor n. Do the authors have a theoretical
for configuration 1?
explanation for the flatness of the curve simulated
full-scale tower
The standard deviation for recent
conditions of
switching surge tests[3] was 4.6 and 3.7 percent for test
Vpositive polarity, wet and dry, respectively, for insulators in the
string configuration. For insulators in vertical configuration
standard deviation was approximately 3.7 for wet and 3.3 percent
for dry conditions. From tests on the Southern California Edison's
500-kV tower[3] in which V-strings are employed, the standard
deviation was 4.8 and 3.2 percent for wet and dry conditions, respectively. The more recent tests performed on the Allegheny5.2Power
and
Systems 500-kV tower[5] showed a standard deviation of for
these
4.0 percent for wet and dry conditions, respectively. Thus,
extensive tests it would be concluded that, 1) the standard deviation
for wet condition on V-string insulators, positive polarity, is over
960
X;
30
~I D
0.8~~~~~~~~~~2
0.8
,I __, _
_
0.6
_
_J
oil
5
0.4
0.2 _
10
_I
D7
2
25
31
5
10
2515
20
NO. OF EOUIVALENT SUSPENSION INSULATOR S
3C,o
AUGUST 1967
are the best way to solve the problem of the economical design of
high altitude EHV transmission-lines insulation.
We agree that the data shown in the paper allow the statement
that air density strongly affects insulation strength, but we think
that further work is required to establish definite values for the
exponent n of the RAD correction factor. Our findings, as explained
in our paper,' show that when comparing results coming from
different test plants, a confidence limit must always be taken into
account, as when test conditions are carefully duplicated. This
means that, in this case, it is possible to attribute t) air density
the variations due to other factors. For instance, in the case of
negative impulse tests of configuration 3, the discrepancies found by
the authors can be justified by the low consistency of the results.
In fact, in our paper, the rod-to-plane configuration shows (Table
I) the poorest consistency (a = 6 percent), so that differences
higher than 34 percent between two results obtained in two different
laboratories can occur with 5 percent of probability. Furthermore,
large discrepancies in these results are reported by the authors (20
units, Pittsfield tests).
We could not completely agree with conclusion 5): "Negative
polarity switching surge produce higher flashover voltages than
positive polarity." According to our test experience, which is confirmed also by the literature, this statement is not generally valid,
as wet negative can be, in quite a number of cases, more restrictive
than positive. On this point, we will be glad to have more detailed
information on the spraying apparatus used both in Pittsfield and
Leadville, particularly concerning nozzles, angle, and uniformity of
precipitation.
Apropos of the general remark on the consistency of the results,
we think that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to find a
temperature effect independent of the RAD effect. We would also
like to ask if any correlation was found between the results and
conditions of sun, fog, snow, dew, wind, frost, and rain, recorded
during all the tests.
We strongly support the opinion of the authors that "the standard
deviation for a single test, should not be given much weight," but an
average value obtained from many tests must be used for each test
condition as the proper standard deviation. These values for insulator strings, calculated on the basis of very large number of
tests, are given on Table VI of our paper. Table VII, given here,
shows substantial agreement between our figures and those proposed by the authors.
TABLE VII
AVERAGE STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF FLASHOVER
DISTRIBUTION FOR INSULATOR STRINGS
air gaps and insulator strings under the action of switching surges,"
Elec. Tech. (USSR), vol. 3, pp. 460-473, 1962.
[2] G. N. Aleksandrov, V. Y. Kizeretter, V. M. Rudakova, and A. N.
Tushnov, "The AC flashover voltage of long air gaps and strings of
insulators," Elec. Tech. (USSR), vol. 2, p. 255, 1962.
[3] A. W. Atwood, Jr., A. R. Hileman, J. W. Skooglund, and J. F.
Wittibschlager, "Switching surge tests on simulated and full-scale
EHV tower-insulator systems," IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus and
Systems, vol. PAS-84, pp. 293-303, April 1965.
[4] W. C. Guyker, A. R. Hileman, and J. F. Wittibschlager, "Fullscale tower-insulation tests for APS 500-kV system," IEEE Trans.
Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-85, pp. 614-623, June 1966.
[5] A. R. Hileman, W. C. Guyker, H. M. Smith, and G. E. Grosser,
Jr., "Line insulation design for APS 500-kV system," this issue,
pp. 987-994.
E. Brasca and L. Zaffanella: (CESI-Centro Elettrotecnico Sperimentale Italiano, Milan, Italy): We are happy to compliment
the authors of this very interesting paper on the extensive experimental work performed, which, for the first time, makes a substantial contribution to the investigation of air density effects. We
completely agree that full-scale tests performed at different sea levels
Paper
This paper
Brasca et al.1
Lightning
Impulse
Switching Impulse
negposnegative
ative positive
itive
dry dry wet dry wet
dry
2
1.1
2
1.4
5
4.2 4.3
3
2.2 3.3
LINE
AIR DENSITY AND TRANSMISSION INSULATION
961
PHILLIPS ET AL.:
particularl
ps
region.
any
under
switching
experienced
statistical
maximum
inthe
mminimum