Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
John M. Robberts
September 2004
Although care has been taken to ensure that all data and information contained
herein is accurate to the extent that it relates to either matters of fact or accepted
practice or matters of opinion at the time of publication, the University of Pretoria
and the author assume no responsibility for any errors in or misinterpretations of
such data and/or information, or any loss or damage arising from or related to its
use.
This formula book is intended as an aid to students during tests and exams. It
therefore contains a summary of only the most important design equations and does
not replace the design code of practice SABS 0100 to which designers should refer.
Table of Contents
1.
2.
3.
Material Properties
2
1.1
Concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2
Reinforcement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Limit States Design
3
4.
5.
10
6.
7.
12
14
14
14
15
15
15
17
17
19
19
19
20
20
20
22
22
23
24
24
26
30
34
37
37
37
38
38
41
42
42
45
45
45
45
46
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...............
...............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
University of Pretoria
Material Properties
1.1
Concrete
Modulus of elasticity
Table 1:
f cu ,t
E c,t = E c,28
0
.
4
+
0
.
6
f cu ,28
(1-1)
n = 0.2
Poissons ratio
(1-2)
(1-3)
gc = 24 kN/m3
Unit weight
Shear modulus
Ec
G=
0.4 Ec
2 (1+ n)
Characteristic
cube strength
fcu,28 (MPa)
Average
Typical
range
20
25
21 - 29
25
26
22 - 30
(1-4)
30
28
23 - 33
(1-5)
40
31
26 - 36
50
34
28 - 40
60
36
30 - 42
e sh ( t ) = e sh , (1- e-a t ) where esh, ranges from 0.10 to 0.30 103 (1-7)
Creep strain
e cr ( t ) = f c C ( t ) =
Creep coefficient
1.2
fc
f( t )
Ec
(1-8)
fc
Ec
where E eff ( t ) =
E eff ( t )
1+ f( t )
(1-9)
(1-10)
Reinforcement
Table 2:
Reinforcement types.
Reinforcement type
Symbol
250
450
450
FS or FD
485
Table 3:
Concrete
Steel
1.5
1.15
Shear
1.4
1.15
Bond
1.4
Serviceability:
1.0
1.0
g f Qn f k / g m
(2-1)
Characteristic strength
f k = f m -1.64 s
(2-2)
Table 4:
Load combination
Self-weight
load
Imposed
load
Wind
load
Self-weight
load
Imposed
load
Wind
load
Self-weight load
1.5
(0.9)
1.1
(1.0)
Self-weight load
+ live load
1.2
(0.9)
1.6
(0)
1.1
(1.0)
1.0
(0)
Self-weight load
+ live load
+ wind load
1.2
(0.9)
0.5
(0)
1.3
(1.3)
1.1
(1.0)
0.3
(0)
0.6
(0.6)
See SABS 0160 (1989) for a complete discussion on loads and their combinations.
Eci
Stress
E ci = 5 . 5
Parabolic
curve
e
c0
f cu
GPa
= 2 . 4 10 -
fcu in MPa
ec0
Strain
f cu
ecu = 0.0035
University of Pretoria
Stress fs
fy
Tension
gm
e yc =
Es = 200 GPa
f yc
Es
ey =
f yc =
Compression
Strain es
fy
g m Es
fy
g m + f y / 2000
Reinforcement
type
Symbol
Mild steel
Tension
Compression
Yield
strength fy
Yield
strain ey
(103)
Yield
strength fyc
Yield
strain eyc
(103)
250
1.087
196.1
0.980
High yield
450
1.957
327.3
1.636
FS or FD
485
2.109
348.3
1.741
3.1
e st = e c
x
(3-1)
N.A.
(3-2)
As
est
esc
As
e sc = e c
x
ec
(3-3)
Cross-section
Strain
3.2
ecu = 0.0035
0.45 fcu
Fcc
Fcc s/2
s = 0.9 x
N.A.
z=d-
Fst
As
s
2
Fst
est
(a) Cross-section
(b) Strain
(c) Parabolic-rectangular
concrete stress block
Figure 4: Equivalent rectangular stress block for singly reinforced rectangular sections.
Neutral axis depth
Table 6:
x ( b b - 0 . 4 ) d 0 .5
(3-4)
where
Moment at the section following redistribution
(3-5)
Moment at the section before redistribution
bb =
with
Redi
strib.
(%)
(3-6)
bb 1
> 0.75 under normal conditions
bb
10 0.90
x/d
z/d
0.50
0.775
0.156
15
0.85
0.45
0.797
0.144
20
0.80
0.40
0.820
0.132
25
0.75
0.35
0.842
0.119
K=
M
f cu b d 2
(3-7)
where
Internal lever-arm
0 .156
K =
2
0 . 402 ( b b - 0 . 4) - 0 .18 ( b b - 0 . 4)
z = d0 .5 +
for b b 0 .9
for b b < 0 .9
0
.
25
0 .95 d
0 .9
As =
M
0 .87 f y z
(3-8)
(3-9)
(3-10)
University of Pretoria
3.3
0 . 67
f cu 0 . 45 f cu
1. 5
ecu = 0.0035
Fsc
esc
x=
(bb 0.4)d
As
s = 0.9 x
s/2
Fcc
N.A.
z
Fst
As
est
(a) Cross-section
(b) Strain
As =
where
Table 7:
( K - K ) b d 2 f cu
f yc ( d - d)
(3-11)
f yc
K f cu b d 2
A
+
0 .87 f y z
0 .87 f y s
(3-12)
As =
K
z = d0 .5 + 0 .25 and
0 .9
x=
2
( d - z)
0 .9
(3-13, 14)
Yield
strength
fy (MPa)
Tension reinforcement
yields when
x/d
d / x
250
0.7629
0.7199
0.3599
0.3239
0.2880
0.2520
450
0.6414
0.5325
0.2662
0.2396
0.2130
0.1864
485
0.6239
0.5024
0.2512
0.2261
0.2010
0.1759
d / d
f yc
d
1( b - 0 . 4)
d E s e cu b
As
bd
0.040
0.030
15
14
13
12
As
11
f y = 450 MPa
As
bd 2
(MPa)
0.015
x/d = 0.3
0.4
0.5
9
M
0.5
0.020
d
= 01
.
d
10
.3
= 0 0.4
d
x/
f cu = 30 MPa
0.010
0.005
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
As
bd
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
3.4
Flanged beams
hf
M = 0 . 45 f cu b f h f
d 2
As =
sw
+ 0 . 45 f cu bw s w d - h f -
(3-15)
0 . 45 f cu b f h f + 0 . 45 f cu bw s w
(3-16)
0 .87 f y
As =
M + 0 .1 f cu bw d (0 . 45 d - h f )
0 .87 f y ( d - 0 .5 h f )
0.45 fcu
ecu
bf
(3-17)
hf
s = 0.9 x
N.A.
As
bw
Cross-section
est
Strain
Fst = fs As
Stresses and forces
z1
University of Pretoria
3.5
Find x from
(3-18)
Stresses
b
(3-19)
M (d - x)
M ( x - d)
Mx
, f st = n f ec = n
, f sc = n
I cr
I cr
I cr
(n 1) As
As
As
(3-20)
n As
N.A.
b
As
n As
n As
(a) Cross-section
( h - x)
x2
+ ( n -1) As ( x - d) = b
+ ( n -1) As ( d - x)
2
2
2
Find x from
(3-21)
As
d
(n 1) As
As
x
(3-22)
As
n As
N.A.
n As
As
(n 1) As
(a) Cross-section
V
bv d
(4-1)
where bv = width of the beam (average width of the web below the flange for a T-section)
0.75 f
cu
v u = lesser of
4 . 75 MPa
(4-2)
vc =
g m 25 bv d d
where
fcu 40 MPa
gm = 1.4
(4-3)
100 As
3
bv d
As = area of properly anchored tension reinforcement (distance d beyond the section under consideration)
Table 8:
Shear capacity vc (in MPa) for beams without shear reinforcement for
fcu = 30 MPa.
100As
bv d
125
150
175
0.15
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.50
2.00
3.00
0.4046
0.4797
0.6043
0.6918
0.7614
0.8716
0.9593
1.0981
0.3865
0.4583
0.5774
0.661
0.7275
0.8328
0.9166
1.0492
0.3719
0.441
0.5556
0.6360
0.7000
0.8013
0.8819
1.0095
Step 4:
Nominal shear reinforcement:
0.3493
0.4141
0.5217
0.5972
0.6573
0.7525
0.8282
0.9481
0.3402
0.4033
0.5082
0.5817
0.6403
0.7329
0.8067
0.9234
0.325
0.3854
0.4855
0.5558
0.6117
0.7003
0.7707
0.8823
400
500
800
0.3025
0.3586
0.4518
0.5172
0.5693
0.6517
0.7172
0.821
0.2861
0.3392
0.4273
0.4892
0.5384
0.6163
0.6783
0.7765
0.2544
0.3016
0.3799
0.4349
0.4787
0.548
0.6031
0.6904
>
s v 0 .0012 b for f yv = 450 MPa
(4-4)
d - d
s
b
(v - v c ) bv
Asb
sb
(0 .87 f yv )[cos a +sin a cot b]
(4-5)
(4-6)
where Asb = area of a bent-up bar, sb = spacing of bent-up bars, a = angle between the horizontal
10
University of Pretoria
and the bar and b = angle between compressive struts in the concrete and the horizontal.
Asv (v - v c ) b
with fyv 450 MPa.
sv
0 .87 f yv
(4-7)
75
1.340
2.094
3.016
5.362
100
1.005
1.571
2.262
4.021
Step 6:
125
0.804
1.257
1.810
3.217
150
0.670
1.047
1.508
2.681
Link spacing
200
250
0.503 0.402
0.785 0.628
1.131 0.905
2.011 1.608
0 . 75 d
Maximum spacing =
1.5 d
(mm)
300
0.335
0.524
0.754
1.340
350
0.287
0.449
0.646
1.149
for links
for bent - up bars
400
0.251
0.393
0.565
1.005
450
0.223
0.349
0.503
0.894
500
0.201
0.314
0.452
0.804
(4-8)
Further comments:
Within a distance 2d from a support, or concentrated load, the shear resistance vc may be
increased as follows
0.75 f
2 d
cu
v c
lesser of
av
4 . 75 MPa
(4-9)
For beams carrying mainly uniformly distributed loads, or where the principal load is applied
further than 2d from the face of the support, a critical section at a distance d, from the face of
the support is considered.
For slabs thinner than 200 mm the resistance of the shear reinforcement should be reduced by
10 % for every 10 mm reduction of slab thickness below 200 mm.
vt =
2T
h
2
hmin
hmax - min
(5-1)
where hmin is the smaller and hmax is the larger section dimension.
3
Step 3: Divide T- L- and I-sections into components that maximises (hmin
hmax ). Consider
11
3
hmax )
(hmin
i
Ti = T
3
(hmin hmax ) i
(5-2)
v t + v v tu
(5-3)
y1
v t v tu
550 mm
(5-4)
Sep 5: Provide torsional reinforcement if v t > v t ,min with vt,min from Table 10. For combined
shear and torsion refer to Table 11.
Table 10: Minimum and maximum stresses for torsion (MPa).
fcu (MPa)
20
25
30
40
vt,min
0.27
0.30
0.33
0.36
vtu
3.18
3.56
4.00
v t > v t ,min
v ( v c + 0 . 4)
v > ( v c + 0 . 4)
Step 6: Designed torsion reinforcement (additional to that required for shear in step 1)
Asv
T
=
sv
0 .8 x1 y1 (0 .87 f yv )
(5-5)
Asv
f yv (x + y )
1
1
sv
fy
(5-6)
As
Step 7: Detailing requirements:
12
University of Pretoria
Longitudinal torsion reinforcement must be distributed evenly around the inside perimeter of
the links so that the maximum clear distance between bars is less than 300 mm.
Each corner of a link should contain at least one longitudinal bar.
Torsion reinforcement may be included at levels of existing flexural reinforcement by
increasing the diameters of the flexural reinforcement appropriately.
Torsion reinforcement should extend for at least a distance equal to the largest section
dimension beyond the point where it is theoretically required.
For T-, L- and I-sections the reinforcement should be detailed so that they interlock and tie the
component rectangles together. If v t < v t ,min for a smaller component rectangle, torsion
reinforcement may be omitted for that component.
fs
f
4 f bu
(6-1)
Fbt
2 f cu
r f 1+ 2 (f / ab )
(6-2)
Lapping of bars:
Minimum lap length must be the greater of 15 f or 300 mm for bars and 250 mm for fabric.
Lap lengths for bars of different diameters can be based on the smaller diameter.
Compression laps must be 25% greater than design anchorage length in compression.
When both bars in a lap are 25 mm or greater in size, and the cover is less than 1.5 times the
smaller bar size, then transverse links of at least 1/4 of the smaller bar size should be provided
at a maximum spacing of 200 mm.
If bars are placed in a bundle, only one bar at a time may be lapped. The maximum number of
bars in a bundle, including laps, should not be more than 4.
Table 12: Design ultimate bond stress fbu in MPa (SABS 0100).
Bar type
Concrete grade
20
25
30
40
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.9
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.3
2.2
2.5
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.1
3.5
4.2
Reduce these values by 30% for deformed top bars and by 50% for plain top bars in
elements where the depth exceeds 300 mm.
13
Concrete grade
20
25
30
40
46
39
37
29
37
32
29
24
45
40
34
29
37
32
28
24
2 r sin
1.4
Cover < 2 f
fb
Fbt
q/2 q/2
f = Diameter
of main
reinforcement
q/2
Fbt
Bar diameter = f
ab
ab
1.0
(b) Definition of ab
1.4
f
LB
Effective anchorage B
= lesser of 4 r and 12 f
(b) Bend
4f
B
r
f
LH
Minimum radius:
Mild steel (fy = 250 MPa)
High yield strength (fy = 450 MPa)
Effective anchorage H
= lesser of 8 r and 24 f
(c) Hook
rmin = 2 f
rmin = 3 f
14
University of Pretoria
7.1
Cover to concrete
Table 14: Minimum cover (in mm) for various exposure conditions.
Concrete
Conditions of exposure
Mild
Moderate
Severe
Very severe
Extreme
20
30
40
50
60
Low-density concrete2
20
40
50
60
70
1
2
7.2
47000
but 300 mm
fs
(7-1)
where fs is the stress in the reinforcement (in MPa) under service loads and is given by
g + g 2 As,req
1
f s = 0 .87 f y 1
g 3 + g 4 As, prov b b
with
(7-2)
Slabs: If any one of the following three conditions apply, the maximum clear spacing is the
lesser of 3 d and 750 mm:
(a) For high yield strength steel (fy = 450 MPa) the slab depth h 200 mm.
(b) For mild steel (fy = 250 MPa) the slab depth h 250 mm.
(c) r 0 .3 % where r=
100 As
bd
If neither of the above conditions apply, the maximum clear spacings given in Table 15 are adjusted as follows:
If r 1 %, maximum clear spacing is taken from Table 15
If r < 1 %, maximum clear spacing is the value from Table 15 divided by r.
15
Table 15: Maximum clear spacing (in mm) between bars (SABS 0100).
Characteristic
strength of reinforcement fy
(MPa)
+10
+15
+20
+25
+30
250
215
230
245
260
275
300
300
300
300
300
300
450
120
130
135
145
155
170
185
195
205
210
220
485
110
120
125
135
140
155
170
180
190
195
205
7.3
Bars in pairs
Bundled bars
Orientation
Horizontal
(hagg + 5 mm)
Vertical
2
h
3 agg
Horizontal
(hagg + 5 mm)
Vertical
2
for bars in the pair on top of each other
h
3 agg
(hagg + 5 mm) for bars in the pair side by side
Horizontal and
vertical
(hagg + 15 mm)
7.4
7.5
100 As
100 Asc
or
4%
bh
bh
(7-3)
Where bars are being lapped the sum of the reinforcement diameters in a particular layer should
not be greater than 40 % of the section width at that level. For columns the following limits apply:
6 % for columns cast vertically
100 Asc
(7-4)
8 % for columns cast horizontally
bh
16
University of Pretoria
fy =
250 MPa
fy =
450 MPa
100As/Ac
0.8
0.45
100As/bwh
0.32
0.18
100As/bwh
0.24
0.13
(1) T-beam
100As/bwh
0.48
0.26
(2) L-beam
100As/bwh
0.36
0.20
Rectangular section (in solid slabs this reinforcement should be provided in both directions)
100As/Ac
0.24
0.13
100Asc/Acc
0.4
0.4
100Asc/Ac
0.4
0.4
100Asc/bhf
0.4
0.4
100Asc/bwh
0.2
0.2
Rectangular beam
100Asc/Ac
0.2
0.2
100Ast/hfl
0.15
0.15
Situation
Tension reinforcement
Sections subjected mainly to pure tension
Sections subjected to flexure
(a)
(b)
(c)
Compression reinforcement (where such reinforcement is required for the ultimate limit state)
General rule
Simplified rule for particular cases:
(a)
(b)
Flanged beam:
(c)
b=
width of section
Acc =
bw =
width, or effective
width of the rib*
Asc =
h=
As =
hf =
depth of flange
Ast =
l=
span of beam
For a box, T-, or I-section, bw is taken as the average width below the flange.
7.6
17
f1
s b bw
fy
(7-5)
h > 750 mm
2
h
3
sb
bw
7.7
Support conditions
Rectangular section
Flanged
section
bw 0.3b
16
12.8
20
16.0
24
bd
0.00
1.00
0.15
1.05
0.25
1.08
19.2
0.35
1.10
28
22.4
0.50
1.14
5.6
0.75
1.20
1.00
1.25
1.25
1.29
1.50
1.33
1.75
1.37
2.00
1.40
2.5
1.45
3.0
1.50
477 - f s
2 .0
MFAs = 0 .55 +
120
0 .9 + 2
b
d
(7-6)
where
r =
Modification
factor
MFAs =
1+
1.5
3+ r
(7-7)
(7-8)
If the basic L/d ratio is applied to a beam with span longer than 10 m, the basic L/d ratio should be
multiplied by 10/L
18
University of Pretoria
M / bd2
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
300
1.60 1.33 1.16 1.06 0.98 0.93 0.89 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.78 0.76
290
1.66 1.37 1.20 1.09 1.01 0.95 0.90 0.87 0.84 0.81 0.79 0.78
280
1.72 1.41 1.23 1.12 1.03 0.97 0.92 0.89 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.79
270
1.78 1.46 1.27 1.14 1.06 0.99 0.94 0.90 0.87 0.84 0.82 0.80
260
1.84 1.50 1.30 1.17 1.08 1.01 0.96 0.92 0.88 0.86 0.83 0.81
250
1.90 1.55 1.34 1.20 1.11 1.04 0.98 0.94 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.82
240
1.96 1.59 1.37 1.23 1.13 1.06 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.88 0.86 0.84
230
2.00 1.63 1.41 1.26 1.16 1.08 1.02 0.97 0.93 0.90 0.87 0.85
220
2.00 1.68 1.44 1.29 1.18 1.10 1.04 0.99 0.95 0.91 0.88 0.86
210
2.00 1.72 1.48 1.32 1.20 1.12 1.06 1.00 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.87
200
2.00 1.76 1.51 1.35 1.23 1.14 1.07 1.02 0.98 0.94 0.91 0.88
190
2.00 1.81 1.55 1.37 1.25 1.16 1.09 1.04 0.99 0.96 0.92 0.90
180
2.00 1.85 1.58 1.40 1.28 1.18 1.11 1.06 1.01 0.97 0.94 0.91
170
2.00 1.90 1.62 1.43 1.30 1.21 1.13 1.07 1.02 0.98 0.95 0.92
160
2.00 1.94 1.65 1.46 1.33 1.23 1.15 1.09 1.04 1.00 0.96 0.93
150
2.00 1.98 1.69 1.49 1.35 1.25 1.17 1.11 1.05 1.01 0.98 0.94
140
2.00 2.00 1.72 1.52 1.38 1.27 1.19 1.12 1.07 1.03 0.99 0.96
130
2.00 2.00 1.75 1.55 1.40 1.29 1.21 1.14 1.09 1.04 1.00 0.97
120
2.00 2.00 1.79 1.58 1.43 1.31 1.23 1.16 1.10 1.05 1.01 0.98
8
8.1
19
Design of Beams
Effective span length
8.2
The length to the face of the support plus half an effective depth. If the
cantilever forms part of a continuous beam the effective length should be
taken as the clear length plus the distance to the centre of the support.
Moment
Shear
0.45F
F Leff /11
-F Leff / 9
F Leff /14
-F Leff /12
0.6F
0.55F
20
8.3
University of Pretoria
Flanged beams
L-section
beff
L
bw + z
= lesser of
5
(8-1)
beff
L
bw + z
= lesser of
10
actual
flange width
(8-2)
where Lz is the distance between zero moments. As a simplified approach for continuous beams,
Lz can be assumed to be 0.7 of the effective span.
8.4
(8-3)
8.5
Curtailment of reinforcement
2.
For bars in tension, the smallest distance from one of the following conditions must also apply:
3.
The bars must extend the ultimate anchorage bond length Lua beyond the theoretical cut-off
point (TCP). For the ultimate anchorage bond the stress in the bar is taken as 0.87 fy.
4.
At the physical cut-off point (PCP) the shear capacity is twice the actual shear force.
5.
At the PCP the flexural capacity of remaining bars is twice the actual bending moment.
If the conditions to the use of Table 22 applies, the simplified rules for curtailment may be used.
CL Support
21
CL Support
12 f
Equivalent
anchorage
12 f
(a)
12 f
d/2
CL Support
Greatest of
bsup /3 and
30 mm
(b)
Equivalent
anchorage
12 f
d/2
Solid slab
v < vc
bsup
(e)
(c)
(d)
d/2 + 12 f
As1
0.5 As1
0.08 L
d/2
Condition 1:
A hook or bend may not
start before the centre
line of a support
Condition 2:
A hook or bend may not
start closer than d/2 from
the face of the support
L = Effective span
0.5 As1
d
d/2
L = Effective span
(c) Cantilever
0.25 L ( 45f)
0.15 L ( 45f)
0.2 As2
As1
0.3 As1
As2
0.6 As2
0.1L
0.3 As1
0.15 L
d/2
L = Effective span
(d) Continuous beam
22
University of Pretoria
9.1
f s ( e s ) = E se s
f yc
for e s e y
for e y < e s < e yc
for e s e yc
d-x
e s =-0 .0035
x
(9-1)
Stress fs
fyc
Compression
ey
Es
eyc
Tension
Strain es
0.87 fy
(9-2)
From equilibrium:
N = 0 . 45 f cu b s + f sc As + f s As
s
M = 0 . 45 f cu b s x p - + f sc As ( x p - d) - f s As( d - x p )
2
F ( h / 2) + Fsc d+ Fs d
Moments about top of section yields plastic centroid: x p = cc
Fcc + Fsc + Fs
b
xp
ecu = 0.0035
s
(< h)
N
d
Strain
ecu = 0.0035
0.45 fcu
Fsc
esc
A s
s
(= h)
d
x
Cross-section
(b) Large axial force
Fcc
FG x < h IJ
H 0.9 K
As
s
2
Fst
est
Cross-section
(9-5)
N.A.
As
(9-4)
0.45 fcu
Fsc
esc
A s
(9-3)
est
Strain
FG x h IJ
H 0.9 K
Fcc
Fst
s
2
Defining points:
23
(c)
0.0035
0.002
esc > eyc
es = 0
(d)
es > eyc
x bal =
1+
(9-6)
ey
0.0035
xbal
Compression failure
(b)
es = ey
Nbal
00035
.
Tension failure
0.0035
0.0035
esc = eyc
(e)
es < ey
es < ey
9.2
Mmin = N emin
(9-7)
. f y Asc
N u = 0.40 f cu Ac + 067
(9-8)
50
SABS 0100: 1992
1.4
1.3
1.2
40
h d
Asc
2
10
1.1
0A
b h sc
1.0
30
8
x/h = 0.9
7
N
(MPa)
bh
fy = 450 MPa
fcu = 30 MPa
d = 0.2 h
d = 0.8 h
6
x/h = 0.8
5
4
20
Asc
2
x/h = 0.7
1
0.4
10
x/h = 0.6
x/h = 0.5
x/h = 0.4
8
M
bh 2
(MPa)
10
12
14
24
University of Pretoria
(10-1)
(c) Qn 5 kPa
(10-2)
(d) Reinforcement must be curtailed according to the simplified rules (Fig. 20).
When using this single load case in the analysis of a continuous slab, a redistribution of moments
should be applied by reducing the support moments by 20% and increasing the span moments
accordingly. Nowhere should the redistributed moments be less than 70% of the elastic moments.
For v < vc /2
CL
Greatest of bs /3 and 30 mm
As1
0.5 As1
0.08 L
d/2
bs
L = Effective span
(a) Simply supported slab
0.3 L
0.5 As2
As1
Greater of
L/2 en 45f
Greatest of
0.15 L and 45f
As2
As1
0.5 As1
d
0.4 As1
d/2
0.2 L
L = Effective span
L = Effective span
*0.5 As1
0.4 As1
0.1L
*0.5 As1
0.4 As1
0.1L
L = Effective span
(d) Restrained ends where zero moments were assumed in the analysis
25
If the span adjacent to a cantilever is less than 3 times the length of the cantilever, the load case
where the cantilever carries the maximum load and the adjacent span carrying a minimum load
should also be considered.
The simplified method given in Table 23 may used if:
(a) The above conditions for the simplified load arrangement apply
(b) The spans are approximately equal
(c) There are 3 or more spans.
Table 23: Ultimate bending moments and shear forces in one-way spanning slabs.
Position
Moment
Shear
0.4F
Outer support:
Near centre of end span
0.086 F Leff
-0.086 F Leff
0.6F
0.063 F Leff
-0.063 F Leff
Interior support
0.5F
(10-3)
Load
x
L
Unsupported edge
Load width
FG
H
1. 2 x 1-
x
L
IJ
K
0.3L
Effective slab
width supporting
the load
26
University of Pretoria
For a rectangular slab, simply supported along all four edges so that lifting of the corners are not
prevented, the maximum moments per unit width in the centre of the slab is given by
m sx = a sx n l 2x
(10-4a, b)
m sy = a sy n l 2x
where
lx = short span
ly = long span
n = total design load (kN/m2)
= 1.2 gn + 1.6 qn
asx
asy
1.0
0.045
0.045
1.1
0.061
0.038
1.2
0.071
0.031
1.3
0.080
0.027
1.4
0.087
0.023
1.5
0.092
0.020
1.6
0.097
0.017
1.7
0.100
0.015
1.8
0.102
0.016
1.9
0.103
0.016
2.0
0.104
0.016
2.5
0.108
0.016
3.0
0.111
0.017
As1
0.5 As1
0.1 L
d/2
L = Effective span = lx or ly
10.2.2
(10-5a, b)
27
Table 25: Bending moment coefficients for rectangular panels supported on four sides with
provision for torsional reinforcement in corners.
Short span coefficients bsx for ly/lx
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.75
2.0
0.032
0.024
0.037
0.028
0.037
0.028
0.045
0.034
Long span
coefficients
bsy for all
ly/lx
0.034
0.045
0.034
0.044
0.044
0.056
0.058
28
University of Pretoria
Reinforcement in lx-direction
Reinforcement in ly-direction
ly
ly
lx /8
Edge strip
Middle strip
lx
Edge strip
Edge strip
lx
3/4 lx
Middle strip
lx /8
Edge strip
ly /8
3/4 ly
ly /8
ly
0.2 lx
0.2 lx
0.2 lx
3/4 Ax
Edge beam
3/8 Ax
Ax
lx
6
8
3/8 Ax
0.2 lx
None
Interior beams
Edge beam
0.1L
0.5 As1
0.5 As1
50
As1
As2
0.5 As1
0.15L
0.15L
0.25L
L = Effective span = lx or ly
Discontinuous edge
Continuous edge
Figure 26: Simplified detailing rules for two-way spanning slabs with restrained edges.
29
The method illustrated in Fig. 27 is proposed when moments at the mutual support to two adjacent slabs differ.
SM 2 =
M A + M B2
2
MB3
+ M2
MO = MB3 MB2
MB2
MA
SM2
M2
(a) Bending moments from Eq. 9-5
MB = MB2 + DBA MO
or MB = MB3 DBC MO
MB
MA
SM2
C
M 2 = SM 2 -
M2
(b) Adjusted bending moments
12 f
As
0.5 As
0.5 x
x
Edge beam
B
C
A
45
lx
60
60
Edge beam
45
M A + MB
2
30
University of Pretoria
Notation
l1 = length of the panel, measured between column centre lines in the direction
under consideration
l2 = width of the panel, measured between column centre lines perpendicular to
the direction under consideration
lx = shorter span
ly = longer span
2
l = effective span = l 1 - hc
(10-1)
=
2
4lh
1 l 1 + l 2
4
2
(10-2)
l ho
= lesser of
l h ,max = l c + 2 (d h - 40 mm)
(10-3)
Analysis
Following the analysis of an equivalent frame, the bending moments should be divided in column and middle strips (see Fig. 31) as shown in Table 26. The maximum design moment at a
support can be taken as the moment a distance hc/2 from the column centre line, provided the
sum of the positive span moment and the average of the support moments is greater than the following
2
nl 2
2
l 1 - hc
8
3
(10-4)
(10-5)
be = width of a strip depending on the distance between the column and the free
31
Middle strip
Negative moment
75%
25%
Positive moment
55%
45%
For the case where the width of the column strip is taken as equal to that of the drop and the
width of the middle strip therefore increases, the design moments resisted by the middle strip
should be increased in proportion to its increase in width. The design moments to be resisted
by the column strip may then be decreased by an amount such that the total negative and total
positive moments resisted by the column and middle strips together are unchanged.
lh,max
lh,max
dh
45
dh
40 mm
45 40 mm
lc
lc
lho
lho
lh = lh,max
lh = lho
(a) Flared column head
lh,max
dh
lh,max
45
dh
40 mm
45 40 mm
lc
lc
lho
lho
lh = lh,max
lh = lho
(b) Constant column head
be = Cx
y
be = Cx + Cy
be = Cx + y
y
y
x
be = Cx + y
column strip
be = Cx + y/2
be = x + y/2
32
University of Pretoria
short span = lx
lx /4
lx /2
lx /4
= Column strip
lx /4
ly lx /2
long span = ly
lx /4
ldrop
ldrop /2
ly ldrop
long span = ly
ldrop /2
ldrop
ldrop
(b) Slab with drops
short span = lx
ldrop
Note:
Ignore drops if < lx /3
33
Position
Moment
Shear
Total column
moment
0.04 F l
0.02 F l
0.45 F
0.4 F
0.04 F l
+ 0.083 F l
0.063 F l
0.6 F
0.022 F l
+ 0.071 F l
Interior support
0.055 F l
0.5 F
0.022 F l
2
l = Effective span in the direction under consideration = l 1 - hc
edge of the slab (see Fig. 30). For an internal column be should not be greater
than the width of the column strip.
d = effective depth of top reinforcement in the column strip
fcu = characteristic concrete strength
If the conditions for the simplified load arrangement (see section 10.1) apply, the simplified
method given in Table 27 may be used to obtain the bending moments and shear forces in the
slab. The following additional requirements must also be met before the simplified method may
be used:
(d) The structure is braced so that sideways stability of the frame does not depend on the
slab-column connection. (The structure is braced).
(e) There should be at least three spans in the direction under consideration.
(f) The span lengths should be approximately equal. (It is assumed here that the spans will be
approximately equal if they do not differ by more than 15% from the longest span).
(g) The curtailment rules for solid one-way spaning slabs (Fig. 20, sec. 10.1) should be used.
10.3.3
Deflections
For flat slabs with drops the basic allowable l/d-ratio for beams is used but multiplied by a factor
of 0.9. If the plan dimensions of the drops are at least a one-third of the respective span in each
direction, the 0.9 factor can be omitted.
The l/d-ratio should always be considered in the critical direction, which is usually the
long-span direction in flat slabs.
34
University of Pretoria
Bcol
0.1 Bcol
Bcol
lx
0.4 lx
= Column strip
0.4 ly
0.1 Bcol
ly
(b) Opening common to two
column strips
Bcol
0.25 Bcol
(c) Opening common to a column strip and a middle strip
10.3.4
Detailing of reinforcement
If the simplified method have been used to obtain the bending moments (section 10.1), the curtailment rules for solid two-way spaning slabs (see section 10.1.2) should be used.
The column strip reinforcement that passes over the column must be placed so that two-thirds of
this reinforcement is placed within half the width of the column strip, centrally over the column.
(10-6)
35
= Failure zone
0.75 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
1.5 d
SAsv
(v - v c ) u d
0 .87 f yv
with (v - v c ) 0 . 4 MPa
5 (0 . 7 v - v c ) u d
For (1.6 v c < v < 2 v c ) : SAsv
0 .87 f yv
(10-4)
where:
u = outside perimeter of the failure zone
Asv = area of shear reinforcement
fyv = characteristic strength of the shear reinforcement (not exceeding 450 MPa)
These equations apply only when:
v < 2 vc
Links are used as shear reinforcement.
The slab is at least 200 mm thick. For every 10 mm less than 200 mm, a 10 % loss of
efficiency should be assumed for the shear reinforcement.
36
University of Pretoria
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp
lp is a multiple of 0.75 d
lp
Slab edge
<6d
Slab edge
Perimeter b
Perimeter a
Perimeter a
Perimeter b
Edge
column
Cy
Veff = 1.25 Vt
Veff = 1.25 Vt
Veff = Vt 1.25 +
Veff = 1.4 Vt *
Mt
Internal column
1.5 Mt
Vt x or
1.5 Mt
or
Vt x
Veff = 1.15 Vt *
Veff = Vt 1 +
Cx x
lp
Perimeter being
considered
Bending
moments
Vt
Shear
forces
37
(11-1)
where lo = clear height between end restraints and b = factor obtained from Table 28.
Table 28: b-Values for effective lengths.
b-Values for effective lengths
End
condition
top
0.75
0.80
0.90
1.2
1.3
1.6
0.80
0.85
0.95
1.3
1.5
1.8
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.6
1.8
2.2
Braced column
Unbraced column
The end of the column is connected to members which, while not designed to
provide restraint to rotation, will nevertheless, provide some restraint.
The end of the column is unrestrained against both lateral movement and rotation.
38
University of Pretoria
l 0 . 7 + 0 .05( a + a )
o
c,1
c, 2
l o
Braced columns:
l e = lesser of
[
]
0
85
0
05
l
+
.
.
a
c,min
o
l 1.0 + 0 .15( a + a )
o
c,1
c, 2
Unbraced columns:
l e = lesser of
l o [2 .0 + 0 .3 a c,min ]
where
(11-2)
(11-3)
ac,1 = ratio of the sum of the column stiffness to the sum of the beam stiffnesses at
the lower end of the column
ac,2 = ratio of the sum of the column stiffness to the sum of the beam stiffnesses at
the upper end of the column
ac,min = lesser of ac,1 and ac,2
If a base have been designed to resist the moment, ac can taken as 1, otherwise ac should be taken
as 10. For a very large stiff base, ac can taken as 0. For simply supported beams framing into a
column ac should be taken as 10.
11.3 Slenderness
A column should be considered slender when
l e 17 - 7M 1 / M 2
>
h 10
where
le =
(11-4)
M1 = smaller initial end moment due to ultimate design moments (negative for
bending in double curvature)
M2 = larger initial end moment due to ultimate design moments
Limits:
(11-5)
(11-6)
Minimum eccentricity
All columns should therefore be designed for a minimum moment resulting from eccentric loading
M min = N emin
where
(11-7)
(11-8)
11.4.2
39
(11-9)
au = ba K h
(11-10)
2
1 le
ba =
2000 h
(11-11)
N uz - N
N - N bal
K = uz
Mi
M bal
vir K 1
(11-12)
vir K > 1
(11-13)
(11-14)
(11-15)
0.1
1
SABS 0100: 1992
0.3
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.05hN
b
fy = 450 MPa
d = 0.2 h
d = 0.8 h
0.7
0.8
Mmin =
0.2
Asc
2
.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.4
h d
0.5
0.8
0.6
Asc
2
1.2
0.5
0.3
1.6
1.4
0.6
N
b h f cu
103 Asc
( MPa )-1
b h f cu
0.2
0.9
0.9
K = 1.0
0.1
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
M
b h 2 f cu
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
40
University of Pretoria
11.4.3
(11-16a b c)
(c) N emin
where
Mi = 0.4 M1 + 0.6 M2
(11-17)
M2 Madd / 2
M2
(b)
End conditions
for column
M2
Madd / 2
M1
Smaller moment
(a)
Braced frame
Madd
M2 Madd / 2
Larger moment
M2
Mi
M2
Madd / 2
(c)
Initial moments
from analysis
Madd
Mmax
Madd / 2
M1 + Madd / 2
(d)
Additional moments
caused by slenderness
(e)
Moment envelope
M add ,unbr
(a) M 2 = M V + M H
1+
MV +M H
(b) 0 .6 M 2 + 0 . 4 M 1 + M add ,braced
(c) N emin
where
(11-18a b c)
41
Madd,braced = additional moment from Eq. (11-3), but using the braced effective length in
Eq. (11-5)
M1, M2 = smaller and larger end moment including the effects of sway
M2 =
M add ,unbr
MV + MH
FG M IJ
H M +M K
H
Smaller moment
Stiffer end
joint
(a)
Unbraced
frame
MV + MH
Larger moment
(c)
(b)
End conditions Initial moments
from analysis
for column
M add ,unbr
M H + MV
IJ
K
Less stiff
end joint
FG
H
MV + M H 1+
M1
M add ,unbr
FG M IJ
H M +M K
M2 =
FG
H
MV + M H 1+
(d)
Additional moments
caused by slenderness
M add ,unbr
M H + MV
(e)
Moment envelope
IJ
K
(11-19a b)
bb
0.000
0.50
0.075
0.60
0.150
0.70
0.250
0.70
0.300
0.65
0.400
0.53
0.500
0.42
0.600
0.30
42
University of Pretoria
12 Staircases
T
The unit weight of the waist, measured horizontally, is determined by multiplying the unit weight measured along the
slope of the stair with
R +G
G
2
W
R
(12-1)
G
R
T
N
W
= Going
= Rise
= tread
= Nosing
= Waist
l2
EcI e
M 3
M cr 3
cr
I e =
I cr I g
I g +1-
Ma
Ma
where
M cr =
065
.
f cu
fr =
.
f cu
030
frIg
yt
(13-1)
(13-2)
(13-3)
Values for K are given in Figure 41. The total deflection (elastic and creep) is given by
D = l D i
where l = 1+ x i f and x i = x / d
(13-5)
(13-6)
(13-7)
Loading
43
0.125
M
al W
3- 4a 2
48(1- a )
M = Wa(1- a )l
l
M
0.0625
W/2 W/2
al
al
0125
. -
Wal
M=
2
l
q
MA
0.104
ql 2
15.6
0.102
FG
H
MB
K = 0104
.
1-
l
qa 2 l 2
2
MA
MB
FG
H
K = 0.083 1-
MC
al
b
10
IJ
K
and b =
M A + MB
MC
End deflection
a(3- a )
If a =1, K = 0.333
K=
6
End deflection
a( 4 - a )
If a =1, K = 0.25
K=
12
Wal
al
a2
6
ql 2
8
MC
al
1
1
If a = , K =
2
12
al
b
4
IJ
K
b=
M A + MB
MC
1 ( 5 - 4a 2 ) 2
80 3- 4a 2
Wl 2
(3- 4a 2 )
24
(13-8)
1 for cantilevers
2
(13-9)
D s = K s K cs
where
44
University of Pretoria
0.7
K cs =
1
r=
r
r
1 en 0 for uncracked members
1-
r
r
[1-011
. (3 - r) 2 ] 1 en 03
. for cracked members
r
(13-10)
100 As
3
bd
r =
100As
bd
r
1
r
The maximum crack width is determined from
w max =
where
3 acr e m
a - cmin
1+ 2 cr
h- x
e m = e1 -
bt ( h - x )( a- x )
3E s As ( d - x )
(13-11)
(13-12)
45
14 Prestressed Concrete
14.1 Sign convention
Tensile stresses and forces are positive.
Hogging bending (concave curvature) is positive.
The eccentricity e of the prestressing force is measured from the centroid of the section and is
taken positive below the centroidal axis.
The sign of the section modulus Z = I/y with respect to a particular fibre is determined by the
distance y of the fibre measured from the centroidal axis. This distance is taken positive for
fibres located below the centroidal axis.
(14-1)
E p2 =
f py - f p1
e py - e p1
f ps = f p1 + E p 2 e ps - e p1
Ep
ep1 0.005 epy
Strain eps
f=
P Pey M y P Pe M
+
+
= +
+
A
I
I
A Z
Z
(14-2)
46
University of Pretoria
where
(14-2)
f se
Ep
(14-3)
P P e2 1
e ce = +
I E c
A
(14-4)
d-x
e
e s =
x cu
(14-5)
(14-6)
0 . 45 f cu b s = f ps A ps
M u = Fcc z = Fps z
(14-7)
0 . 67
f cu 0 . 45 f cu
1. 5
ecu
s = 0.9 x
Fcc
s/2
N.A.
h
Centroidal
axis
e
z
Fp= Aps fps
Aps
ece
ese
(a)
Strain induced by
effective prestress
only (i.e. zero moment)
es
ese
ece
eps = es - ece + ese
(b)
Strain distribution
at ultimate conditions
(c)
Concrete stresses and
resultant forces
47
48
University of Pretoria
49
10
12
1000
975
950
925
900
875
850
825
800
775
750
725
700
675
650
625
600
575
550
525
500
475
450
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
50
52
53
54
56
57
59
61
63
65
67
69
72
74
77
80
84
87
91
96
101
106
112
118
126
134
144
155
168
183
201
223
251
287
335
402
503
670
1005
2011
79
81
83
85
87
90
92
95
98
101
105
108
112
116
121
126
131
137
143
150
157
165
175
185
196
209
224
242
262
286
314
349
393
449
524
628
785
1047
1571
3142
113
116
119
122
126
129
133
137
141
146
151
156
162
168
174
181
188
197
206
215
226
238
251
266
283
302
323
348
377
411
452
503
565
646
754
905
1131
1508
2262
4524
314
322
331
340
349
359
370
381
393
405
419
433
449
465
483
503
524
546
571
598
628
661
698
739
785
838
898
967
1047
1142
1257
1396
1571
1795
2094
2513
3142
4189
6283
12566
25
32
40
491
503
517
531
545
561
577
595
614
633
654
677
701
727
755
785
818
854
892
935
982
1033
1091
1155
1227
1309
1402
1510
1636
1785
1963
2182
2454
2805
3272
3927
4909
6545
9817
19635
804
825
847
869
894
919
946
975
1005
1038
1072
1109
1149
1191
1237
1287
1340
1399
1462
1532
1608
1693
1787
1892
2011
2145
2298
2475
2681
2925
3217
3574
4021
4596
5362
6434
8042
10723
16085
32170
1257
1289
1323
1359
1396
1436
1478
1523
1571
1621
1676
1733
1795
1862
1933
2011
2094
2185
2285
2394
2513
2646
2793
2957
3142
3351
3590
3867
4189
4570
5027
5585
6283
7181
8378
10053
12566
16755
25133
50265
50
University of Pretoria
10
12
50.3
101
151
201
251
302
352
402
452
503
553
603
653
704
754
804
855
905
955
1005
1056
1106
1156
1206
1257
1307
1357
1407
1458
1508
1558
1608
1659
1709
1759
1810
1860
1910
1960
2011
78.5
157
236
314
393
471
550
628
707
785
864
942
1021
1100
1178
1257
1335
1414
1492
1571
1649
1728
1806
1885
1963
2042
2121
2199
2278
2356
2435
2513
2592
2670
2749
2827
2906
2985
3063
3142
113.1
226
339
452
565
679
792
905
1018
1131
1244
1357
1470
1583
1696
1810
1923
2036
2149
2262
2375
2488
2601
2714
2827
2941
3054
3167
3280
3393
3506
3619
3732
3845
3958
4072
4185
4298
4411
4524
314.2
628
942
1257
1571
1885
2199
2513
2827
3142
3456
3770
4084
4398
4712
5027
5341
5655
5969
6283
6597
6912
7226
7540
7854
8168
8482
8796
9111
9425
9739
10053
10367
10681
10996
11310
11624
11938
12252
12566
25
32
40
490.9
982
1473
1963
2454
2945
3436
3927
4418
4909
5400
5890
6381
6872
7363
7854
8345
8836
9327
9817
10308
10799
11290
11781
12272
12763
13254
13744
14235
14726
15217
15708
16199
16690
17181
17671
18162
18653
19144
19635
804.2
1608
2413
3217
4021
4825
5630
6434
7238
8042
8847
9651
10455
11259
12064
12868
13672
14476
15281
16085
16889
17693
18498
19302
20106
20910
21715
22519
23323
24127
24932
25736
26540
27344
28149
28953
29757
30561
31366
32170
1256.6
2513
3770
5027
6283
7540
8796
10053
11310
12566
13823
15080
16336
17593
18850
20106
21363
22619
23876
25133
26389
27646
28903
30159
31416
32673
33929
35186
36442
37699
38956
40212
41469
42726
43982
45239
46496
47752
49009
50265