Documents of Interest Re Synthetic Telepathy May 26, 2015

scaterbone@live.
com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA
17603
PRESS RELEASE
Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:42:54 PM
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our website
at http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/.
____________________________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Hon. P. Michael Sturla

8 North Queen Street
Suite 1100 The Griest Building
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-3157
Fax: (717) 295-7816
Hon. P. Michael Sturla
120 Main Capitol Building
PO Box 202096
Harrisburg, PA 17120-2096
(717) 787-3555
Fax: (717) 705-1923
Hon. Bryan Cutler
207 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
(717) 786-4551
Fax: (717) 786-3645
Hon. Bryan Cutler
147A East Wing
PO Box 202100
(717) 783-6424
Fax: (717) 772-9859
Hon. John M. Perzel
7518 Frankford Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19136
(215) 331-2600
Fax: (215) 708-3135
Hon. John M. Perzel
PO Box 202172
(717) 787-2016
Fax: (717) 783-7225
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
610 North 2nd Street
(215) 503-3245
Fax: (215) 503-7850
Hon. Michael H. O'Brien
107 East Wing
PO Box 202175
(717) 783-8098
Fax: (717) 780-4787
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

852 Village Rd.,Municipal
Bldg
P.O. Box 268
Lampeter, PA 17537
(717) 464-5285
Fax: (717) 295-7817
Hon. Matthew E. Baker

115 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202068
(717) 772-5371
Fax: (717) 705-1850
Hon. Scott W. Boyd

432 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202043
(717) 783-6422
Fax: (717) 787-7731
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Judiciary, Chairman
645 Penn Street, 2nd Floor
Reading, PA 19601
(610) 376-1529
Fax: (610) 378-4406
Hon. Katie True

2938 Columbia Avenue
Manor West Commons, Suite
501
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 295-5050
Fax: (717) 295-5053
Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

106 Irvis Office Building
PO Box 202127
(717) 787-3525
Fax: (717) 772-5401
Hon. Katie True

7 East Wing
PO Box 202041
(717) 705-7161
Fax: (717) 705-1946
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver,
Health & Human Services,
Chairman
2839 West Girard Avenue
(215) 684-3738
Fax: (215) 235-4629
Hon. Frank Louis Oliver
34E East Wing
PO Box 202195
(717) 787-3480
Fax: (717) 783-0684
Hon. Matthew E. Baker
Health & Human Services,
Chairman74 Main Street
Wellsboro, PA 16901
(570) 724-1390
Fax: (570) 724-2168
Hon. Ron Marsico

Judiciary, Chairman
4401 Linglestown Road, Suite B
Harrisburg, PA 17112
(717) 652-3721
Fax: (717) 652-6276
Hon. Ron Marsico
218 Ryan Office Building
PO Box 202105
(717) 783-2014
Fax: (717) 705-2010
Hon. Camille Bud George,
Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
275 Spring Street
Houtzdale, PA 16651
(814) 378-6279
Fax: (814) 765-0609
Hon. Camille Bud George
38B East Wing
PO Box 202074
(717) 787-7316
Fax: (717) 783-8236
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Environmental Resources &
Energy, Chairman
302 Seneca Street
Oil City, PA 16301
(814) 677-6363
Fax: (814) 676-1653
Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson
PO Box 202064
(717) 783-8188
Fax: (717) 705-1945
Lloyd K. Smucker (R)
Senate District 13
Lancaster (part) and York (part)
Counties.
Senate Box 203013
Harrisburg, PA 17120-3013 185
Main Capitol
(717) 787-6535
D.O. ADDRESS:
44 North Christian Street
Suite 100
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 397-1309
lsmucker@pasen.gov
http://senatorsmucker.com
Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Senate District 15
Dauphin (part) and York
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203015
173 Capitol Building
(717) 787-6801
D.O. ADDRESS:
916-B Park Plaza
North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
(717) 896-7714
jpiccola@pasen.gov:
http://www.piccola.org
Michael W. Brubaker (R)

Senate District 36
Chester (part) and Lancaster
(part) Counties.
Senate Box 203036
16 East Wing
(717) 787-4420
FAX: (717) 783-3156
D.O. ADDRESS:
301 East Main Street
Lititz, PA 17543
(717) 627-0036
mbrubaker@pasen.gov
http://senatorbrubaker.com
City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use Against Residents | ...
1 of 2
http://www.globalresearch.ca/city-council-votes-to-ban-mind-control-we...
Print
City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use Against

Residents
By Melissa Dykes
Global Research, May 21, 2015
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/city-council-votes-to-ban-mind-control-weapon-use-against-residents/5450998
Its hard to even guesstimate the number of people, not just in

America but around the world, who feel they are being targeted by
space age directed energy mind control weapons and gangstalked
by minions of governments and shady groups for scientific
experiments and other seedy ends.
The numbers are at least in the hundreds of thousands at this
point.
Every once in a while, a little piece of this trend rises to the
surface and makes its way into mainstream headlines, if even at a local level as is the case with the
recent news that the Richmond, California City Council which just passed a resolution in support of
the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based
weapons.
Via San Jose Mercury News:
Few societal threats escape the watchful eye of the Richmond City Council, so it was no surprise
Tuesday night that it voted its opposition to airborne weapons systems that have allegedly targeted
residents with mind-control technology. You read that correctly.
After a dozen professed victims told of pain suffered from chemtrails, particle beams and
electromagnetic radiation, the council voted 5-2 in favor of Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles
resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to
permanently ban spaced-based weapons, with Mayor Tom Butt and Councilman Vinay
Pimple dissenting. [What unfortunate names>]
Im just a dumb city council person, Butt said, and this is way, way over my head. I frankly think
its way out of the purview of what this city council should be taking up.
Colleague Nat Bates was more understanding: Im going to support the resolution for the simple
reason that we have voted on a lot of dumb ideas.
With a population of nearly 108,000 people in 2013, Richmond is no small town> and this is just
one example of one town in one state in our country where at least a dozen people felt the need to
speak out about what they believe is happening to them.
While these council members can poke fun and make light of this, guaranteed the people suffering
what they believe is never ending electronic harassment by the government dont think its very
humorous at all.
And the numbers of those people who do believe that appear to be growing exponentially.
5/26/2015 11:57 AM
City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use Against Residents | ...
2 of 2
http://www.globalresearch.ca/city-council-votes-to-ban-mind-control-we...
The purpose of the Space Preservation Act of 2001, introduced by former U.S. Representative
Dennis Kucinich, was to reaffirm it is the policy of the United States that activities in space should
be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.
The bill would have permanently banned all space-based weapons and the termination of testing and
developing them. It further specifically defined weapon in part as a device capable of Inflicting
death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person via the use of land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations.
It further noted that this would include exotic weapons systems such as electronic, psychotronic,
or information weapons; chemtrails; high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; plasma,
electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; laser weapons systems; strategic, theater, tactical,
or extraterrestrial weapons; and chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
The bill, of course, got lost in committees and never passed. Not that our government would even
bother to pass such a bill in the first place as a token gesture, but even if they had, considering
most of the projects listed above are all like top secret or even above top secret military projects, it
wouldnt have been enforced anyway.
We only hear about some of the space weapons coming out now and then in the news or via the
patent office, and guaranteed whatever we hear about, you know they likely have something years
more advanced we have no idea about because the American public is on a need-to-know basis
and long ago at least back to the late-1800s when they were developing and secretly testing electric
airships, the government decided we dont need to know.
We are currently being told microwave energy weapons are still a conspiracy theory, even as
Boeing recently patented a Star Wars-style force field capable of producing a plasma field between
the target and the explosion using lasers, electricity and microwaves.
However, the bottom line here is that so many American citizens are now publicly complaining of
electronic harassment of various types at the hands of our government that city councils are being
forced by their constituency to take up resolutions about it.
The truth cannot be buried forever.
Copyright 2015 Global Research
5/26/2015 11:57 AM
STATE-OF-AFFAIRS AND OBSTACLES FOR FINDING AN EQUITABLE

LEGAL AND/OR CONGRESSIONAL REMEDY
FOR VICTIMS AND TARGETS OF
U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL AND ORGANIZED STALKING
(The following are not arranged in any meaningful order.)
Obstacle 1:
In the United States John Q. Public and every other U.S. Citizen has seen
their civil liberties and civil rights erode at an accelerated rate since September 11, 2001 with
the passage and continued renewal of the Patriot Act This dilutes the eluding compassion for
our victimizations, abuses, and torturous lives that we live. The Obama Administration has been
as relentless as the Bush Administration, if not more in perpetuating this.
Obstacle 2: The preceding has allowed 1960 COINTEL-PRO like tactics to be mainstreamed by
local and federal law enforcement agencies, especially important are the abuses of the fusion
centers in helping to aggravate our victimizations and our targeting.
Obstacle 3: Advanced aspects and components of Mind Control Technologies and devices are
being mainstreamed, legalized and commercialized at an alarming rate in the few years; for
example RFID Implants, Computer to Brain and Brain to Computer Technologies, and the
development of Mind Controlled Prosthetics. This helps to dilute and blur difference between
harmful, malicious, and illegal technologies with helpful and moral technologies.
Obstacle 4:
Lack of willing and collaborating Intelligence Officer/Official and/or Military
Officer/Official to come forward as an insider as a true whistleblower of the abuses and
victimizations/experimentations that we are seeking relief that can document the technologies
and/or programs used to harm targets and victims.
Obstacle 5: Social Media and related technologies are making Organized Stalking even more
covert and more mainstreamed; even more disturbing is the accelerating trends of its potency
and power when used against us in our targeting and victimizations.
Obstacle 6: Computer Hacking is becoming more mainstreamed and synchronized with

portable wireless devices as a weapon to harass, isolate, brainwash, sabotage our lives with the
ability to create false personas to disguise the perps or discredit and ruin us, the targets.
Obstacle 7: Lack of legal evidence useful in both civil and criminal courts relating to our
targeting with specific regards to the source of the many lethal technologies and in regards to
the user responsible for its deployment.
Obstacle 8: Lack of a solid court case or cases that can provide legal precedent for our claims
in a U.S. Court of Law that has been successfully adjudicated and unsealed that relates to the
most common of our targeting and victimizations.
Obstacle 9: Lack of direct correlation and evidence between U.S. Sponsored Mind Control type
patents and the actual entities that utilize them; and victims and targets that they harm.
Obstacle 10: The long Gap-In-Time from the outing and public disclosure of the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control Project of the CIA, named MK-ULTRA (which only occurred due to the
suicide of Frank Olson) to our present day It has been some 34 plus years.
Obstacle 11: Advancement of wireless and electromagnetic type weapons that leave no trace of
deployment and no trace to its source that are constantly deployed against us.
Obstacle 12: The new breed of Non-Lethal Weapons currently being deployed by Federal and
Local Law Enforcement that are developed from similar like technologies that have been
deployed against us as targets and victims for decades.
Obstacle 13: The unfortunate ease and ambitious tactic of diagnosing our victimizations and
targeting to simulate text-book like symptoms of highly regarded psychiatric disorders and the
increased proliferation of psychiatric abuses and misdiagnosis of targets and victims. As
important is the ever increasing role and authority of local law enforcement in enforcing this
tactic to ruin and discredit targets at will through the use of illegal forced hospitalizations.
Obstacle 14: The lack of any real scientific and/or analytical manner to measure the progress
and success of most or all activism projects that will lead the targeted community to a legal or
congressional remedy.
Obstacle 15: The ease of sabotaging and discrediting activities, lives, and activism of targets
and victims through the use of social media and covert surveillance technologies that are
commercially available today to anyone with the time and limited resources that they demand.
Obstacle 16: Lack of any real Legislator/Politician/Official, or any authoritative figure with any
kind of respect and prominence to advance our issues and shine the light on our abuses and
victimizations like Church, Kennedy, and Company in the 1970s as they related to MK-ULTRA
Church Commission Hearings.
Obstacle 17: The relentless ambition and ease of falsely criminalizing any target or victim at
will by federal or local law enforcement in order to discredit and/or quite them I site the recent
handling of Federal Whistleblowers over the past several years.
Obstacle 18:
The Mass Media is owned by too few corporations.
Obstacle 19:
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of the Wal-Mart sex
discrimination case has instantaneously diluted the effectiveness of filing a class action lawsuit
of our claims as a class action complaint.
Obstacle 20: There just seems to be no good incentive for anyone in a position of authority
and integrity to champion our issues in pursuit of a remedy and relief from our targeting and
victimizations that offsets the risk of self-destruction or from becoming a target themselves.
The Military-Intelligence-Law Enforcement Complex of the United States has become way too
powerful; way too cozy; and spends way too much of our taxpayers money all while acting
above the law without proper oversight too many activities.
For all of the above reasons I have remained quiet for the last year, especially considering that I
have had enough personal experiences with Nos (13)-(15)-(17) to last a lifetime. I cannot
afford any more of those. See the attached signed affidavit regarding my targeting and
victimizations.
Stan J. Caterbone
June 29, 2011
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
mailto: amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigator

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGATOR

24 CRIMINAL CHARGES DISMISS/WITHDRAWN/NOT-GUILTY
1987 TO 2007
1. 09/01/1987 Cc2706 Terroristic Threats - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
2. 09/03/1987 Cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
3. 09/03/1987 Cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief - F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
4. 09/03/1987 Cc3502 Burglary - F1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
5. 09/03/1987 Cc3701al Robbery - F1 Quashed /Dismis /Demur Sus
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3921a Theft By Unlwf Taking Or Dispo F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a1 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Nolle Prossed /Withdrawn
7. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a2 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Quashed / Disnis / Demur Sus
8. 12/05/2006 1 18 5503 A2 Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise - Withdrawn (Lower Court)
9. 12/05/2006 1 18 3926 A4 Theft Of Services-Acquisition Of Services Withdrawn (Lower Court)
10. 12/05/2006 1 18 2709 A7 Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly In Another Manner Withdrawn (Lower Court)
11. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
12. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
14. 01/23/2007 1 18 6501 A1 Scatter Rubbish Upon Land/Stream Etc Dismissed (Lower Court)
15. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
16. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
17. 01/18/2007 1 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked Not Guilty
18. 01/18/2007 1 75 1786 F Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Not Guilty
19. 04/30/2007 1 18 5503 A4/ Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off Not Guilty
20. 04/30/2007 2 18 5507 A / Obstruction Highways Not Guilty
21. 04/30/2007 3/ 18 2709 A3 Harassment - Course Of Conduct W/No Legitimate Purpose Nolle Prossed
22. 04/30/2007 1 75 3111 A / Disregard Traffic Control Device Not Guilty Nolle Prossed
23. 05/10/2007 M2 18 5104 Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce 08/04/2006 K4775120
24. 05/10/2007 3 M1 18 908 A Make Repairs/Sell/Etc Offens Weap 08/04/2006 K4775120 Nolle Prossed
Sheryl Crow's stalker terror

AskMen Editors
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter
NEW YORK Sheryl Crow has spoken of her terror over her alleged stalker - saying she had an "eerie"
feeling when he was waiting outside her dressing room.
The 42-year-old singer was shocked when she realised obsessive fan Ambose Kappos was stalking her
after he scuffled with her bodyguards at New York's Hammerstein Ballroom last October.
Speaking at Kappos's trial, she said: "I was really nervous. It was just an eerie feeling that someone was
standing outside my dressing room."
Kappos - who believed Crow was his "spiritual twin" - then approached the singer's entourage outside
the venue later that evening.
Crow added: "I came up to the car and there was chaos. I was pushed inside. They were saying, 'Back
away, back away.'"
Kappos, 38, became obsessed with Crow in April 2002 after seeing her photo on the back of a CD.
He told police in a video confession: "She was just shining like a star and shining with God's love. I
believe God promised me I would someday get contact with Sheryl."
Kappos - who was issued with a restraining order after contacting the
star's family - also believed he could communicate telepathically with
Crow and claimed when he asked her to marry him that way, she said
yes.
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
The Dr. Phil show (Currently on NBC TV at 3:00pm EST Monday thru Friday)
5482 Wilshire Boulevard #1902
Los Angeles, CA 90036
What is going on in your town that has everyone divided? Is there a dispute or an ongoing debate? Does
everyone in the town have a different opinion of what the fate of a certain child should be? Different opinion on
what is right or wrong in human nature? Does your town need a Dr. Phil intervention? Is there something going
on that is making headlines and is the talk of the town? Does everyone have an opinion? Tell us what your
town is struggling to make a decision with!
**We cannot help with sewage problems or whether a statue should be erected or not. Please keep that in mind
when responding.
***Dr. Phil cannot read all emails and cannot respond to every email personally. Dr. Phil producers may call to
discuss your story to be on the show. Please only respond if you are willing to appear on the show
September 19, 2008
The Dr. Phil Show (Currently on NBC TV at 3:00pm EST Monday thru Friday)
5482 Wilshire Boulevard #1902
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Dear Dr. Phil:

Lancaster County desperately needs a Dr. Phil Intervention - A.S.A.P.
Let me summarize the situation as best I can in a quick letter. You may visit my website and
blogs for additional information or your producers may provide me with an email address (secure)
to forward substantiating documentation.
In 1987 I filed complaints (Federal Whistleblower) of a large firm, International Signal & Control
(ISC of Lancaster, PA) of fraud. I was a shareholder and executives met with me regarding
involving myself and the financial firm that I have founded (Financial Management Group, Ltd.,).
I was libeled, slandered, falsely imprisoned (5 times with 30 false arrests where all charges were
dismissed), falsely hospitalized (3 times never committed) (fraudulent suicide allegations and the
like) all in an effort to discredit me.
Four years later in 1991 the company and many executives were indicted and plead guilty to
selling arms to Iraq through South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud. In essence I was covered up. I
have had one attempt on my life. In those years I went public with my allegations to local, state,
Page 1 of 2
and federal officials, with some of the meetings being recorded, which I still posses. In 1987 I
also had over 9,000 pages of documents microfilmed to preserve the truth.
The twist is that the operations were covert and part of a rogue CIA program. Some of the same
architects of the Iran-Contra saga were also involved. This is all very well documented through
congressional hearings and news reports. Ted Kopple and ABC News/Nightline did three (3)
stories on ISC/Lancaster and the CIA and the illegal sales of arms (mostly cluster bombs) to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 did the first episode on the story in February of 1991 during the Persian Gulf
War. The Nightline stories ran up until the U.S. Senate confirmation hearings for Robert Gates
(Current U.S. Secretary of Defense) for the Director of the CIA (September 1991). Questions
were asked during the hearings of his involvement in the ISC-CIA operations and subsequent
sales of arms to Iraq.
The cover-up continued, and all of my attempts for the courts were, of course, subverted, until
2005. I finally was able to file in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as
a pro se litigant. I entered on my own behalf and have been litigating ever since.
Ok, now it is 2005 and I am in federal courts and now everyone in Lancaster County again tries to
subvert and obstruct my litigation, however, there is a new twist - I am now telepathic (since
2006).
Over the years I know that some of the black budget programs (usually part of some intelligence
agency which operations were either classified or not sanctioned) were delving into my mind.
I have had meetings with at least two government agencies, the NSA (National Security Agency)
and the Defense Intelligence Agency. One of my problems is that I have extensive research
materials, all declassified, on mind control programs, but of course the source remains covert.
Anyway, I can deal with this issue.
For whatever reason that I am telepathic, I am constantly communicating with another person of
interest. I have communicated with several persons in the past two (2) years.
I am literally driving this quaint little corrupt town of Lancaster Pennsylvania CRAZY. The envy
and jealousy is beyond your wildest imagination, and it is causing a high degree of stress that is
just not normal for anyone, let alone a community.
What is the most challenging to deal with is all of the hostile and adversarial attitudes of Lancaster
County, all because I was right and they are wrong!
People will do anything for money, and there are many violations that will cost my defendants
millions of dollars, both for damages and for the violations to my intellectual property as well as
the extortion of my businesses and assets.
They cannot handle my intelligence or my history. This community needs an expert in conflict
resolution before more people get hurt.
We need your help.
Sincerely,
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Page 2 of 2
Gmail - RE: Bobby Ray Inman, ISC & Telepathy - FFCHS Conference Ca...
1 of 13
https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&search=i...
Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
RE: Bobby Ray Inman, ISC & Telepathy - FFCHS Conference Call
News 11/27/10
1 message
Stan J. Caterbone <scaterbone@live.com>
Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:35 PM
To: Derrick Robinson <derrickcrobinson@gmail.com>, Advanced Media Group <advancedmediagroup@yahoo.com>, "Stan J.
Caterbone" <scaterbone@live.com>, Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
November 28, 2010 6:30pm EST
Derrick,
Just to provide you with more background on the ISC/NSA connection, they were alleged by ABC News and the Financial
Times of London in 1991 to have been involved in black ops programs with the NSA and CIA in the exporting of arms to Iraq.
Tedd Koppel of Nightline did the reporting in segments from May to September of 1991. ABC News 20/20 did a segment in
February of 1991.
Also in September of 1991, Robert Gates, the current Secretary of Defense, was questioned in detail about his involvement
and knowledge of ISC, Lancaster, and the alleged arms sales during is confirmation hearings for Director of CIA (I have the
CNN Broadcast). This was all reported by Ted Koppel in 3 different segments in the summer of 1991 ( I have all of the
broadcasts). ISC was indicted a few months later for a massive fraud and the illegal arms sales. They (ISC) were apparently
used and left to take the fall. On a side note, Robert Gates was here in Lancaster just last year for the wedding of his niece
who lives here.
It is just too suspicious that all these mind altering/controlling victimization's and torture, including 24/7 telepathy went robust
and in high gear in 2005, the same year I filed a federal civil action (I withdrew the complaint including information of ISC and
their related activities). I have some suspicions that they were doing some type of remote monitoring back to 1987, but
nothing I can put a finger on compared to what started in 2005. Of course the stalking related victimization's began in 1987.
For what it is worth, ISC/Ferranti had many capabilities for developing technologies. I wish I knew if they were involved in any
of the non lethal weapons that terrorize us.
Also, I may have listed Bobby Ray Inman's career wrong, he was not secretary of the Navy, but Director of the NSA. Here is
part of his (Bobby Ray Inman) wikipedia: (click here) He served as Director of Naval Intelligence from September 1974 to July
1976, then moved to the Defense Intelligence Agency where he served as Vice Director until 1977. He next became the
Director of the National Security Agency. Inman held this post until 1981. His last major position was as the Deputy Director of
the Central Intelligence Agency, a post he held from February 12, 1981 to June 10, 1982.
He was also listed in this document by Thomas Porter "Brief History of MK-ULTRA" Click Here To Link To Document Some
of the Players-"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Parapsychological Association meeting arrangements, via their
'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time defense contractor, has held the
largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman is on its board of directors, among
others."
Stan J. Caterbone
From: derrickcrobinson@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:34:19 -0500
Subject: Re: Bobby Ray Inman, ISC & Telepathy - FFCHS Conference Call News 11/27/10
To: scaterbone@live.com
Hi Stan. Thanks so much for writing! I also noticed the article about Bobby Ray Inman in this collection because he was
director of NSA in the late 70's and early 80's when I was there! So I must have a look at that soon.
11/29/2010 11:24 AM
2 of 13
Also, I had no idea that you had connections and information that connect to NSA. Your case may tie into ours somehow.
Hopefully, you could be a plaintiff with us. We have had no clear connection to the federal spy agencies, such as NSA. I'll
check into this. This is valuable information.
Derrick
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Stan J. Caterbone <scaterbone@live.com> wrote:
November 27, 2010
Derrick,
I was trying to write a statement of my targeting since November 4th and at that time included
some information on U.S. Secretary of Navy and former Deputy Director of CIA and Board of
Directors of ISC, the company I blew the whistle on in 1987, Bobby Ray Inman. It just so
happens that in your link to the Document Archive of ICOMW - It covers Bobby Ray Inman and
discusses synthetic telepathy and his research on paranormal activities. I have known about
Bobby Ray Inman for years but thought it was important to let you know since he was included
in your link. It is highly probable that this has something to do with my targeting as it relates to
telepathy and electromagnetic weapons attacks. The following is (1)my unfinished statement,
(2)the document contained in your links on Bobby Ray Inman, and a (3)related news article
about Bobby Ray Inman that confirms his ISC relationship.
I think this might be of interest to you and FFCHS as far as sourcing telepathy technology with
the CIA and Navy, as well as other DOD agencies.
Stan
1-November 4, 2010 Statement: I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since
1987. In 1987 I blew the whistle (public Allegations and Complaints to State and
Federal Authorities of Fraud during merger negotiations with British Defense
Contractor Ferranti International) on an international defense contractor named
International Signal & Control, or ISC, who was selling arms (Everything from
Telemetry Systems to Cluster Bombs) to Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a
$1 Billion dollar Fraud in 1992 by the United States Attorney and several other federal
agencies. See ABC/News 20/20 and Nightline in 1991. They were founded and
headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and
was solicited by a top ISC Executives (Convicted as a Mastermind of the Billion Dollar
Fraud) to help finance some of their operations through an affiliate called United Chem
Con. ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United
States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's. One of it's first
contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland. Former Secretary of the Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was on the Board of
Directors of ISC and was also on the Board of Directors of Science Applications
International Corporation, or SAIC. SAIC was a huge defense contractor that was the
recipient of the Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA, program on Remote Viewing,
which SAIC named Project Stargate. It was reported that Bobby Ray Inman declined
the nomination for Secretary of Defense under the first Clinton Administration because
11/29/2010 11:24 AM
3 of 13
of the ISC and Trecor scandals. In the early 1990's I was a subcontractor on a project for
the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, or DARPA, with the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, or NIST called TIMIT. The project developed speech corpora for the
development of computer based speech recognition systems. I was also involved in the bidding
of other Department of Defense contracts dealing with information technologies. In 1998 I was
stalked and approached by an employee of the National Security Agency, or NSA in York,
Pennsylvania who said my problems were not with the NSA, but the good ole boys. In 2005 I
was detained by 2 Defense Intelligence Agency, or DIA officers in a museum on a military base
in Austin, Texas and was questioned and interviewed regarding my civil actions filed in federal
court for several hours. I was released and told to stay off of all military bases. My brother, a
Family Physician in Austin Texas had to verify my travel plans and the fact that I was staying
with him prior to my release.
Stan J. Caterbone
2-Document Archive of ICOMW 1982 Central Intelligence Agency

/Admiral Bobby Inman (click here)
The Wall Street Journal of April 22, 1982 reported the resignation of Admiral Bobby Inman as
Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, "a move that government sources believe
was prompted by a dispute over plans for domestic intelligence activities". The report goes on to
say that Admiral Inman objected to a new directive the White House had approved on
counterintelligence operations. "He reportedly felt the new procedures allowed intelligence
agencies to get too heavily involved in spying activities in the U.S. Also, sources said, that he
was miffed because the White House didn't allow him a greater voice in shaping the intelligence
procedures".
From our present vantage point, it seems as if Admiral Inman was in conflict with Vice
President George Herbert Walker Bush, who apparently thought it part of his portfolio
to stage-manage the CIA from his office in the White House because he was a former
director of the Central Intelligence Agency. However, at the time we found this article
(some years after it was published) we were only interested in whether the
new procedures Inman objected to included the use of synthetic

telepathy to entrap persons suspected of spying, and possibly even the
use of synthetic telepathy and other electronic affects to torture
peaceful citizens intosuicide or crimes of violence in order to prove that
the Central Intelligence Agency controlled their minds.
With the intention of resolving the issues behind Admiral Inman's departure from the Central
Intelligence Agency, we telephoned Gerald Seib at the Washington, D.C. office of the Wall
Street Journal. He greeted us quite cordially (for remembering an article he had written years
earlier), but as we proceeded to the matter-at-hand he became vague as to what, if anything,
he could add to the story he had written. We decided to call Admiral Inman himself. We found
Admiral Inman at his new job with a public-private initiative to make the United States
pre-eminent in the manufacture of semi-conductors, and managed to get through to the
aide-de-camp he had brought with him from the Navy. That man certainly could listen. He
promised to discuss the questions we had laid before him and to get back to us regarding our
request to speak with the Admiral. Several weeks later, we telephoned the aide-de-camp again
and he responded that he had, indeed, discussed our conversation with Admiral Inman. Then he
gave us the Admiral's response in a manner which was so precise that we imagined he was
reading it word-for-word from a slip of paper on which he had written it down: "Admiral Inman
is not prepared to discuss that matter - at this time".
Therefore, dear visitor, we give you Gerald Seib's article itself to see what you can make of it.
However, we wish to remind you that from 1983 to 1986 there were a plethora of arrests of
Soviet spies in Washington culminating with the kidnapping in Rome and transport to
Washington of Vitaly Yurchenko, one of the senior officers of the KGB. Yurchenko had the
misfortune of being stationed in the Soviet Embassy in Washington at the time George Herbert
Walker Bush was DCI, and apparently had incurred his enmity.
11/29/2010 11:24 AM
4 of 13
3-WITHIN A MONTH! THE BRINGING DOWN OF BOBBY RAY INMAN

(click for full article)
So let's stop the juvenile psychoanalyzing of Bobby Ray and cut to the content. The charges
about to surface against Inman in the hearings included possible financial and even criminal
peccadilloes in the private sector, centering around two companies. One was Inman's
role as a member of the board of International Signal and Control, a firm

found by a federal district judge to be a criminal enterprise engaged in
illegal arms dealing, money laundering, and business fraud on a
massive scale. The other firm was Tracor, Inc., an Austin, Texas military contractor of
which Bobby Ray was chief executive, but not before Inman received nearly $1 million in
executive compensation. Then, of course, there was Inman's Nannygate, in which he hastily
paid $6,000 in back Social Security taxes for an aged part-time housekeeper only after he
had been nominated for secretary of defense.
Stan J. Caterbone
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:14:28 -0500

From: derrickcrobinson@gmail.com
To: scaterbone@live.com
Subject: FFCHS Conference Call News 11/27/10
To receive email from Derrick Robinson, add derrickcrobinson@gmail.com to your safe sender list
Subscribe
Unsubscribe
Send to a Friend
Preferences
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022

Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Email: info@freedomfchs.com
Voicemail: 1-800-571-5618
Fax: 1-866-433-4170
Website: www.freedomfchs.com
11/29/2010 11:24 AM
Brief History Of MK-Ultra
Page 1 of 4
Mind Control
CIA MK-Ultra Program

CIA Program On Mind Control
By Tom Porter 1996
All Rights Reserved
Started during WWII with research on hypnosis for interrogation, secure courier duties, and reducing
fatigue. Also research into effects of primitive drugs like barbiturates and cannabis as far as drugassisted interrogation goes.
George Estabrooks was the leading proponent of hypnosis as the be-all and end-all of manipulating
peoples minds. His book, 'Hypnotism', published in the early forties, has been decried as too fantastic
and improbable in terms of describing the capabilities of hypnosis with certain very suggestible subjects,
but his arguments and examples remain valid to this day.
Start of Cold War and Korean War in particular gave a big boost to mind control research with the
emergence of 'Brain Washing' as a common term. Supposedly a development of the dastardly ChiComs, the term was actually coined by a magazine writer later found to be on the CIA payroll as an
agent of influence. Postulating a 'brainwashing gap' The CIA got the go-ahead for research into
countering communist mind control efforts and developing their own to aid in the espionage wars.
Hypnosis, drugs, and psycho-surgery; separately and combined, were the tools of this quest for the
ultimate truth serum on the one hand, and the capability to create an agent who could not have his or her
mission tortured out of them, or even be aware that they were carrying secret information given to them
in an altered state of consciousness. More and more sophisticated drugs were experimented with, such as
LSD, Ketamine, and Psilocybine. Lobotomy and the implantation of electrodes were considered as
methods for creating a compliant agent. Electro-Convulsive Shock, combined with LSD, sedation for
days at a time, and constantly replaying the patient's own voice through helmet-mounted headphones
was a notorious Canadian researcher's recipe for mind control.
One of the most remarkable cases of mind control involves a famous model of the late 40's and 50's
named Candy Jones. In the book, "The Control of Candy Jones" the author reviewed hours of tapes
made by Candy Jones and her husband which revealed a systematic program to create and manipulate
alter personalities as the foundation for programmed couriers resistant to torture, where the primary
personality would not even be aware of the secret information being carried. The information could be
summoned forth via a post-hypnotic command or response to a pre-programmed cue.
Research continued into early 70's by CIA's own admission during the Church hearings. John Marks,
author of the best study of CIA mind control experiments, makes the subtle differentiation that the CIA
congressional witnesses might truthfully say that all research done by the TSS Directorate had ended,
since the programs were moved into other areas once operational techniques had been developed. Many
of the names mentioned in reference to mind control research turn up in the few references to supposed
dead-end research in ESP.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/shadowlands/6583/project106.html?200926
1/26/2009
Page 2 of 4
There have been persistent rumors of Navy research involving attempts at telepathy from submarines
under water, the Nautilus being the most famous of these. Detection of enemy submarines, and
communicating with our own, has continued to be an important area of conventional research for the
Navy, so it is no surprise that researching the use of ESP for these purposes would be of interest.
Communicating with a submerged submarine is the only kind of communications where the very act of
receiving puts the receiver in danger, since submarines must normally stick an antenna out of the water
for high speed radio traffic, or rely on trailing a long wire antenna under water relatively near the surface
to receive very slow speed traffic using ELF radio waves. Newer techniques may involve the use of
blue-green wavelength lasers, but evidently penetration to any depth is still a problem.
If you look at telepathy as a problem in the transfer of information in a very noisy environment, then
certain existing solutions suggest themselves: There have already been experiments in the transmission
of five distinct symbols via telepathy, namely Zener card symbols. I suggest that there is already a way
of transmitting information using two symbols only, namely Morse Code. Current ELF or VLF radio
transmission methods for communicating with fleet ballistic missile submarines to issue them their
launch orders involve very low data transfer rates, on the order of 3 to 30 bits per minute, if I am not
mistaken. Messages are very short, consisting of pre-formulated action or targeting codes. I suggest that
telepathic 'Zener Morse' is an operational technique for information transfer under severe signal to noise
conditions. In fact the use of five Zener symbols would increase data transfer rates, but at the expense of
a higher error rate due to the problems in discriminating between five and just two symbols.
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS AND REPORTS
Reports of Project SCANNATE in 70's, most likely done by Swann, since his method for RV is very
similar to that reportedly used in this project; namely providing latitude and longitude coordinates and
telling what is there. Later changed to assigning random number for unique session number and Swann
picked up location anyway.
"The New Age Army:" Over the past 10 - 15 years a number of military personnel, most in significant
positions in Military Intelligence, have expressed interest in and directed programs or projects that have
explored paranormal activities and capabilities. Several government studies on Enhancing Human
Performance took place during this time. Most, if not all of them, were savaged in the NRC study on
Enhancing Human Performance, but recent critiques and rebuttals of this study have indicated severe
irregularities in the evaluation procedures for papers submitted to the NRC study, suppression of
favorable results, and a definitely one-sided evaluation panel.
Much modern research in parapsychology tends to support the idea that Enhanced Perception is a
survival-related trait from our distant past, not the tip of the iceberg as far as new emerging human
powers go. This is supported by the observation that many psychic episodes center around catastrophic
or traumatic events. Studies of Siberian and Eskimo shamans also show the development of ESP or
similar shamanic powers due to injury, exposure to cold, and isolation. Dissociation with tendencies
towards Multiple Personality Disorder also occurs in these Shamans due to their ordeals. This is in
contrast to the experiences of most tropical shamans who tend to find their powers through exposure to
mind-altering drugs.
The Vietnam war, with its exceedingly stressful combat environment of no clear-cut enemies combined
with ambush being the normal way of making contact, produced a large body of individual reports
stressing enhanced perception and awareness. This showed up as detecting ambushes and booby-traps
before they were sprung; detecting the presence of enemy soldiers without any conscious sign of them;
time dilation when bullets could be seen slowly traveling around the battlefield, and even reports of
soldiers avoiding those bullets by jumping out of their paths as they were shot at.
1/26/2009
Page 3 of 4
Dr. Ian Wickramasekera of Eastern Virginia Medical School has studied the expansion of sensory input
during trauma which would lead to time dilation, etc. This gentleman has also studied the effects of
sensory deprivation on hypnotic susceptibility in young women.
In a recent article in U.S. News & World Report, John Gittinger, a CIA psychologist associated with a
CIA front organization, the Human Ecology Society admitted to knowledge of experiments in
developing ESP by giving electric shocks to subjects when they gave wrong answers.
Recently, a Russian researcher in psychotronics, Dr. Igor Smirnov, has helped to start up a new Virginia
company, called Psycho-Technologies, I believe. It is supposed to conduct research on various kinds of
LTL technology, with a concentration on Soviet-developed psychotronic warfare capabilities involving
the use of electromagnetic and sonic waves to influence and disable individuals or crowds. Supposedly
this ranges from simply falling to influencing peoples thoughts via audio or visual subliminal messages.
SOME OF THE PLAYERS
The Monroe Institute, located near Charlottesville, Virginia. Bob Monroe, author of many books on Out
of Body experiences, has long and close ties with the C.I.A. James Monroe, Bob's father, if I'm not
mistaken, was involved with the Human Ecology Society, a C.I.A. front organization of the late 50's and
60's. The Monroe Institute has done research on accelerated learning and foreign language learning
through the use of altered states of consciousness for the C.I.A. and other government organizations.
Government interest in the more radical research going on at the institute remains only tantalizing
speculation. Official classified document storage boxes have been seen at their mail-order outlet located
in Lovingston, VA.
Albert Stubblebine and John Alexander. Both retired Army officers, a General and Colonel respectively.
Both worked at U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command, or INSCOM, Stubblebine as its head at
one time. Stubblebine has publicly stated that an enlisted man under his command inadvertently
'mentally fried' an intelligence gathering computer located in Augsberg Germany. This was Lynn
Buchanan, discussed later.
Alexander wrote the rebuttal to the NRC paper on Enhancing Human Performance. He used this rebuttal
as the basis for a book he co-authored called "The Warrior's Edge" which describes various techniques
for enhancing performance and perception utilizing the power of the mind. (Alexander headed up
research on Less Than Lethal weapons at Los Alamos National Laboratories until 'retiring.')
Jack Houk, Aerospace Engineer, and his Spoon bending parties, done for last 12 - 15 years. Stubblebine,
Alexander, and others have attended and hosted these parties. While even Houk admits that much of the
bending activity that occurs is due to hysterical strength, people getting excited, etc. there are always a
few really perplexing feats of bending at each party. Curled and twisted hacksaw blades comes to mind,
since these normally snap if they are bent.
S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Parapsychological Association meeting arrangements, via their
'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time defense
contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray
Inman is on its board of directors, among others.
Startup of TREAT, Center for Treatment and Research into Experienced Anomalous Trauma, by Rima
Leibow. Leibow is a psychiatrist who started studying trauma associated with alien abductions, noting
its similarities to PTSD. She has hosted open and closed meetings for the past six years. Leibow is a
1/26/2009
Page 4 of 4
close friend of/or married to Stubblebine, which certainly raises some interesting questions. Another
abduction researcher and friend is Victoria Lacas, who happens to be married to Alexander.
One other TREAT hanger-on, and friend of Stubblebine's, is Lynn Buchanan. Buchanan offers services
similar to PSI-TECH and has worked with Ed Dames on a contract basis. He taught a Remote Viewing
workshop at the latest TREAT conference. Also offers continued training in RV skills to those whom he
decides to work with. Veteran of INSCOM, and the famous 'computer frier' mentioned by Stubblebine.
A real mystery man in all of this is C.B. Scott Jones: Ex-Navy Intelligence officer, one time aide to
Senator Claiborne Pell, founder of the Human Potential Foundation; Jones appears to have his fingers in
every 'weird' pie around. He has been involved with several UFO research organizations, dolphin-human
communications research, served on the boards of several scholarly parapsychological research
organizations. Jones strikes many people as a 'Cardinal Richelieu' figure, manipulating events behind the
scenes, but rarely emerging into the spotlight.
There is literally no conference on parapsychology that he does not attend. He has traveled and done
research with Alexander and Rima Leibow. He works at keeping very well informed about the 'pulse' of
the New Age community and about UFO and parapsychological research in particular. He rarely writes
anything for print, but keeps in contact with many of the players in the fields. He has presented papers to
many conferences, most of the examples I have seen are complex, lengthy, and elaborate pieces of disinformation which leave the listeners more confused than when he started. This is an individual who
bears watching.
Back To Top Secret Projects
1/26/2009
Bobby Ray Inman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1 of 4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Ray_Inman
Bobby Ray Inman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bobby Ray Inman (born April 4, 1931) is a retired United

States admiral who held several influential positions in the
U.S. Intelligence Community.
Bobby Ray Inman
Contents
1 Career
2 Nomination for Secretary of Defense
3 International Signal and Control (ISC) Scandal
4 Statements
5 See also
6 References
7 External links
Career
He served as Director of Naval Intelligence from September
1974 to July 1976, then moved to the Defense Intelligence
Agency where he served as Vice Director until 1977. He next
became the Director of the National Security Agency. Inman
held this post until 1981. His last major position was as the
Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, a post he held from
February 12, 1981 to June 10, 1982.
Inman's official CIA photo, 1983
Born
April 4, 1931
Rhonesboro, Texas
Allegiance
United States
Service/branch
United States Navy
Years of service
19511982
Rank
Admiral
Inman has been influential in various advisory roles. Notably,

he chaired a commission on improving security at U.S.
foreign installations after the Marine barracks bombing and the April 1983 US Embassy bombing in Beirut,
Lebanon. The commission's report has been influential in setting security design standards for U.S. Embassies.
After retirement from the Navy, he was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Microelectronics and
Computer Technology Corporation (MCC) in Austin, Texas for four years and Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Westmark Systems, Inc., a privately owned electronics industry holding company for three
years. Admiral Inman also served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 1987 through 1990.
Admiral Inmans primary activity since 1990 has been investing in start-up technology companies, where he is a
Managing Director of Gefinor Ventures and Limestone Ventures. He is a member of the Board of Directors of
Massey Energy Company and of several privately held companies. He serves as a Trustee of the American
Assembly and the California Institute of Technology. He is an elected Fellow of the National Academy of Public
Administration.
President Clinton nominated him as Secretary of Defense, but he withdrew his nomination (see below).
Inman also was on the board of SAIC.[1]
5/24/2015 9:10 AM
2 of 4
Since 2001, Inman has held the LBJ Centennial Chair in National Policy at The University of Texas at Austin
Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, and in 2005 and again in 2009 was the school's interim dean.[2]
Inman graduated from Texas with a bachelor's in history in 1950.
Inman has also served on the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations, Dell Computer, SBC
Corporation (now AT&T)[3] and Massey Energy.
In 2011 he became head of the board of directors of Xe Services, formerly Erik Prince's Blackwater and now
known as Academi.[4] As of 2013, he sits on the Board of Directors of Academi.[5]
Nomination for Secretary of Defense

Inman was announced as President Bill Clinton's choice to succeed Les Aspin as Secretary of Defense on
December 16, 1993, initially receiving broad bipartisan support. He accepted the post at first, but withdrew his
nomination during a press conference on January 18, 1994.[6]
During the press conference, Inman made angry remarks about comments by New York Times columnist William
Safire.[7] Safire wrote paragraphs on Inman's "anti-Israel bias shown", and ended in a four point list of other
negative qualifications. In reply, Inman suggested that Safire had recruited Senator Bob Dole of Kansas to
engage in a "vitriolic attack" on Inman, and also claimed that Dole and Senator Trent Lott were planning to "turn
up the heat" on his nomination.
Dole's reaction was to state that "I have no idea what's gotten into Bobby Inman... Admiral Inman's letter doesn't
make any sense to me." Lott appeared even more surprised, saying that "I am floored by [Inman's] bizarre press
conference", while an unnamed White House aide added: "Most of us were glued to the tube, our mouths open
in shock."[8]
International Signal and Control (ISC) Scandal

In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the
board of directors of the company, which was allegedly either negligent or approved illegal exports.[5]
Originally called ESI (Electronic Systems International), the company manufactured sub-assemblies for the
AGM-45 Shrike and RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles in 1974, and just after the Vietnam war which was part of a
standard arms contract for the US defense administration (DCAS). The company also had a commercial repair
facility of two meter portable amateur ("ham") radios from a company in New Jersey called Clegg,[2] and
manufactured communications helmet radios for firemen, and electronic outdoor bug zappers.
ISC was involved in two major indiscretions, for which CEO James Guerin received a 15-year prison sentence:
It defrauded and caused the collapse of the British company Ferranti, which acquired it in 1987.[3] It exported
classified military technology to South Africa, which was then forwarded to third countries, notably Iraq.
From 1984 to 1988, ISC sent South Africa more than $30 million in military-related equipment, including
telemetry tracking antennae to collect data from missiles in flight, gyroscopes for guidance systems, and photoimaging film readers, all of which would form the "backbone" of a medium-range missile system. Some of this
technology was reportedly transferred to Iraq.[7] Another link to Iraq was the supply of the specifications for the
Mk 20 Rockeye II cluster bomb through Chilean defence company Carlos Cardoen, which was able to build an
5/24/2015 9:10 AM
3 of 4
almost identical weapon that was subsequently used against coalition forces in the Persian Gulf War of January
February 1991.[8]
Statements
In 2006, Inman criticized the Bush administration's use of warrantless domestic wiretaps, making him one of the
highest-ranking former intelligence officials to criticize the program in public.[9][10]
See also
References
1. James Bamford, The Shadow Factory, Doubleday, 2008, p201
2. Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs. Biography of Bobby R. Inman (http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/faculty
/inman.html), retrieved 2007 October 16.
3. Pletz, John. "Michael Dell's view from the top", (http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories
/archive/0502dell.html) Austin American-Statesman, 2004 May 2.
4. Former Blackwater Security Firm Gets New Leaders in Image Makeover (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03
/09/blackwater-security-firm-gets-new-leaders-image-makeover/) By Justin Fishel March 09, 2011, foxnews.com
5. Academi Board of Directors (http://academi.com/pages/about-us/board-of-directors)
6. Bobby Inman Withdrawal Press Conference (http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/53874-1)
7. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/23/opinion/essay-cold-comfort-level.html William Safire column on December 23,
1993
8. Adm. Inman Asks Clinton To Withdraw Nomination - The Tech (http://tech.mit.edu/V113/N66/inman.66w.html)
9. Shachtman, Noah. "Ex-NSA Chief Assails Bush Taps (http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006
/05/70855)", Wired News, 2006 May 9.
10. "Ex-NSA Head Bobby R. Inman on the National Security Agencys Domestic Surveillance Program: This Activity
Was Not Authorized (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/17/159213)", www.democracynow.org,
2006 May 17.
External links
Biography of Bobby R. Inman (http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1993/931216i.htm)FAS.org
University of Texas Biography (http://www.utexas.edu/lbj/faculty/bobby-inman/)
Government offices
Preceded by
Lew Allen, Jr.
Director of the National Security Agency

19771981
Succeeded by
Lincoln D. Faurer
Preceded by
Frank Charles Carlucci III
CIA Deputy Director

19811982
Succeeded by
John N. McMahon
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bobby_Ray_Inman&oldid=663093410"

Categories: 1931 births Living people Directors of the National Security Agency
Deputy Directors of the Central Intelligence Agency People from Upshur County, Texas
People of the Defense Intelligence Agency United States Navy admirals
University of Texas at Austin alumni Academi Directors of the Office of Naval Intelligence
5/24/2015 9:10 AM
4 of 4
This page was last modified on 19 May 2015, at 15:01.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may
apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered
trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
5/24/2015 9:10 AM
Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the Huma...
1 of 5
About
Contact
Membership
Store
Donate
USA
http://www.globalresearch.ca/psychotronic-and-electromagnetic-weapons...
Canada
Latin America
Africa
Middle East
Europe
Russia & FSU
Asia
Oceania
Notre site en Franais: mondialisation.ca

Espaol Italiano Deutsch Portugus srpski
Asia-Pacific Research
Search...
US-NATO War
Economy
Font-size:
Civil Rights
Environment
Poverty
Media
Justice
9/11
War Crimes
Militarization
History
Science
Print:
Global Research Newsletter:

Enter Your Email
GO
Latest News / Top Stories
Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote

Control of the Human Nervous System
The Root Cause of the Migrant Crisis

Putting Profits Before People
By Mojmir Babacek
Empower Yourself to Fight the Power
Global Research, March 16, 2014

Global Research 31 January 2013
The Vietnam Syndrome: Fascists Flipping

Burgers in Saigon or Stalingrad
Sowing the GMO Seeds of Depopulation?
Egypt: Morsis Death Sentence. What was
the Role of the US?
BRICS Trample US in South America
Netanyahu Appoints Hardline Peace
Negotiator
Global March Against Monsanto Day
Alleged Drug Trafficking in Venezuela:
Government Rejects Attacks against
Cabello, Launches Campaign
All Articles
4057
Region: Russia and FSU, USA

Theme: Militarization and WMD, Science and Medicine
Like
3.6k
393
286
22.2K
In March 2012 the Russian defense minister Anatoli Serdjukov said:

The development of weaponry based on new physics principles; direct-energy
weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons,
psychotronic weapons, etc., is part of the state arms procurement program for
2011-2020,Voice of Russia
The world media reacted to this hint on the open use of psychotronic weapons by the
publication of scientific experiments from the 1960s where electromagnetic waves were used to
transmit simple sounds into the human brain. However, most of them avoided saying that since then
extensive scientific research has been carried out in this area throughout the world. Only a Colombian
newspaper, El Spectador, published an article covering the whole scale of the achievements of this
(computerized English translation).
Britains Daily Mail, as another exception, wrote that research in electromagnetic weapons has been
secretly carried out in the USA and Russia since the 1950s and that previous research has shown
that low-frequency waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it
possible to transmit suggestions and commands directly into someones thought processes. High
doses of microwaves can damage the functioning of internal organs, control behaviour or even drive
victims to suicide.
In 1975, a neuropsychologist Don R. Justesen, the director of Laboratories of Experimental
Neuropsychology at Veterans Administration Hospital in Kansas City, unwittingly leaked National
Security Information. He published an article in American Psychologist on the influence of
microwaves on living creatures behavior.
In the article he quoted the results of an experiment described to him by his colleague, Joseph C.
Sharp, who was working on Pandora, a secret project of the American Navy.
Don R. Justesen wrote in his article:
By radiating themselves with these voice modulated microwaves, Sharp and Grove
were readily able to hear, identify, and distinguish among the 9 words. The sounds heard
were not unlike those emitted by persons with artificial larynxes (pg. 396).
That this system was later brought to perfection is proved by the document which appeared on the
website of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997, where its Office of Research and
Development presented the Department of Defenses project:Communicating Via the Microwave
Auditory Effect.In the description it said:
An innovative and revolutionary technology is described that offers a low-probabilityof-intercept radiofrequency (RF) communications. The feasibility of the concept has been
established using both a low intensity laboratory system and a high power RF transmitter.
Numerous military applications exist in areas of search and rescue, security and special
operations (See web.iol.cz)
In January 2007 the Washington Post wrote on the same subject:
NEWS
MOST POPULAR
GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS
THEMES
In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using
microwaves to send words into someones headV Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the
research laboratorys directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or
current or related research in the field, citing the labs policy not to comment on its
microwave work. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this
article, the Air Force released unclassified documents surrounding that 2002 patent
5/24/2015 8:23 AM
2 of 5
I-BOOKS SERIES
IN-DEPTH REPORTS
records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994
at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of
human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least
through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear the research laboratory,
citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials
GLOBAL RESEARCH VIDEOS

THE GLOBAL RESEARCH NEWS HOUR
We can only stress again that the world media avoid publishing the full scale of the progress in the
research of the remote control of human nervous system. Dr. Robert Becker, who was twice
nominated for Nobel Prize for his share in the discovery of the effects of pulsed fields at the healing of
broken bones, wrote in his book Body Electric about the experiment from 1974 by J. F. Schapitz,
released due to the Freedom of Information Act request.
J.F. Schapitz stated:
In this investigation it will be shown that the spoken word of hypnotist may also be
conveyed by modulated electromagnetic energy directly into the subconscious parts of
the human brain i. e. without employing any technical devices for receiving or
transcoding the messages and without the person exposed to such influence having a
chance to control the information input consciously.
In one of the four experiments subjects were given a test of hundred questions, ranging from easy to
technical ones. Later, not knowing they were being irradiated, they would be subjected to information
beams suggesting the answers to the questions they had left blank, amnesia for some of their correct
answers, and memory falsification for other correct answers. After 2 weeks they had to pass the test
again (Dr. Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow
and comp., New York, 1985,. The results of the second test were never published. It is rather evident
that in those experiments the messages were sent into human brain in ultrasound frequencies which
the human brain perceives, but of which the subject is unaware. Dr. Robert Becker, due to those
publications and his refusal to support the building of the antennae for the communication with
submarines in brain frequencies, lost financial support for his research which meant an end to his
scientific career.
Transmitting human speech into the human brain by means of electromagnetic waves is apparently, for
the researchers, one of the most difficult tasks. It must be much easier to control human emotions
which motivate human thinking, decision making and actions. People who claim to be victims of
experiments with those devices complain, aside of hearing voices, of false feelings (including orgasms)
as well of aches of internal organs which the physicians are unable to diagnose.
Truth in Media: Support the Global

Research News Hour
Become a Member of Global Research
Receive Free Books!
Artworks for Peace: Support Global
Research
Donate to Global Research
In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma stated that capabilities
enabling remote control of the human nervous system or the remote infliction of health impairment are
available to many modern governments .See web.iol.cz
It is rather evident that those technologies are used, in conflict with the Nuremberg code, for
experiments on unwitting human subjects. In 2001 the newspaper of the U.S. army, Defense News,
wrote that Israel was experimenting with those weapons on Palestinians. Ibid
As well ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya, while under siege in Brazilian embassy in
Honduras, complained that he had been subjected to an electron bombardment with microwaves
which produces headache and organic destabilization The Guardian, October 2008
Advanced Search
When asked by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now:
Index by Countries
As president, do you know about this in the Honduran arsenal? He replied: Yes, of course
Index by Author
The use of those weapons is time and again reemerging in times of political crisis. According to
Russian daily newspapers, during the failed putsch against Mikhail Gorbachov in 1991, general Kobets
warned the defenders of the Russian White House that mind control technology could be used against
them (Komsomolskaya Pravda, September 7,1991, O. Volkov, Sluchi o tom chto nam davili na
psychiku nepotverzdalis. Poka).
After the putsch, the vice president of the League of Independent Scientists of the USSR, Victor
Sedlecki, published a declaration in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda where he stated:
As an expert and a legal entity I declare that mass production V of psychotronic
biogenerators was launched in Kiev (this is indeed a very serious issue). I cannot assert
for sure that that were exactly Kiev generators that were used during the putschV
However, the fact that they were used is obvious to me. What are psychotronic
generators? It is an electronic equipment producing the effect of guided control in human
organism. It especially affects the left and right hemisphere of the cortex. This is also the
technology of the U.S. Project Zombie 5. He further stated that due to the inexperience
of the personnel who operated them the attempt to use the generators failed
Global Research Publishers
(Komsomolskaya Pravda, August 27,1991, Avtory programy Zombi obnaruzheny v

Kieve,
See also http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz/img/Authors_of_project_zombie.gif).
In the USA, at present several hundred people complaining of the remote manipulation of their nervous
system are preparing a class action lawsuit against the FBI, Department of Defense and other
agencies, requesting them to release files pertaining to their persons, detect the harmful radiations
aimed at their bodies and sources of those radiations. As well perhaps over 2000 people are
5/24/2015 8:23 AM
3 of 5
complaining in Russia, over 200 in Europe, over 300 in Japan and tens of people in China and India.
Russian politician, Vladimir Lopatin, who was working on Committee on Security of the Russian State
Duma and introduced there a bill banning the use of those technologies, admitted in his book
Psychotronic Weapon and Security of Russia (publishing house Sinteg, Moscow, 1999) that in
Russia experiments on unwitting citizens are carried out, when he wrote:
Compensation of damages and losses connected with social rehabilitation of persons
suffering from destructive informational influence must be realized in legal trial (excerpts
from the book in English
(http://mojmir.webuda.com/Psychotronic_Weapon_and_the_Security_of_Russia,
113).
pg.
It should be understood that most of those people pass through mental hospitals. Vladimir Lopatin
visited the USA in 1999 as a chairman of the Military Reform Subcommittee of the USSR Supreme
Soviet Committee for Issues of Defense and State Security and met with Richard Cheney. At that time
he was described as the leader of a new breed of Soviet dissidents. Then he disappeared from top
ranks of Russian politicians.
Why has this research remained classified until present time? There are two explanations for this: First
there is a secret arms race in progress in the world where the superpowers compete to gain decisive
supremacy in this area and in this way master the control of the whole world. Second the governments
keep those technologies in store for the case that they would not be able to control, by democratic
means, the crisis that may arise as a result of their poor decisions. In both cases the era of
democracy and human freedom in history will come to an end. According to the declaration of the
former Russian Defense minister Serdjukov, there are maximally eight years left within which those
weapons will officially become a part of the Russian military arsenal. For democracy this would mean a
beginning of the end.
Join us on Facebook
Global Research (Centre for
Research on Globalization)
Like 94,976
Partner Websites
Project Censored
Stop NATO
Strategic Culture Foundation
The Corbett Report
Washington's Blog
Anyway, in the past Russians were not resolved to put those means to work. When the construction of
the American system HAARP was launched, with the system supposedly being able to target large
regions of the planet by vibrating the ionosphere in brain frequencies (in this experiment the brain
frequencies were not used, but the HAARP system can transmit in brain frequencies as well), Russia
declared its willingness to ban mind control technologies. The Russian State Duma and consequently ,
the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States addressed the United Nations,
OBSE and the European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the
development and use of informational weapons. According to the Russian newspaper Segodnya in
March 1998, the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan, and included on the
agenda of the General Assembly of the U.N. web.iol,cz, op cit
It is most likely the USA refused to negotiate this convention and in consequence the ban of
informational weapons was not discussed by the United Nations General Assembly. Even in the U.S.
congress appeared a bill proposing the ban of mind control technologies http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin
/query/r?c107:chemtrails.
But this was only for a very short period of time. The bill was then changed and in the new bill the ban of
those technologies was left out of the Space Preservation Bill. Neither the U.S. congress nor the U.S.
president made ever an effort to ban mind control weapons. The European Parliament reacted as well
to the launch of the HAARP system construction, when it called in 1999 for the ban of manipulation of
human beings.
The resolution was passed after the testimony of the American author of the book Angels Dont Play
this HAARP, Nick Begich, which apparently convinced the European Parliament of the possible use of
this system to manipulate minds of whole populations. In the report by the European Parliaments STOA
(Science and Technological Options Assessment) panel Crowd Control Technologies the originally
proposed text of the European Parliaments resolution is quoted. There the European Parliament calls
for an international convention and global ban on all research and development , whether civilian or
military , which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other
functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings, including a ban on any actual or possible deployment (stressed by
the author of the article) of such systems. (40, pg CII, ref. 369). But apparently at the same time the
European countries resigned on this intention when accepting the NATO politics of non-lethal weapons.
The same STOA report claims that the USA is a major promoter of the use of those arms and that:
In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in
allied arsenals (pg. xlv) and it goes on:
In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army includedV directed energy systems
and radio frequency weaponsEuropean Parliament
(at the bottom of the page, second reference pg. Xlvi).
Directed energy system is further defined by the STOA document:
Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human
brain activity at synapse level (at the bottom of the page, first reference, Appendix 6-67). Since 1999
those weapons have been upgraded for another 13 years. European Parliament
5/24/2015 8:23 AM
4 of 5
In 1976 the future National Security advisor to president Carter, Zbygniew Brzezinski, wrote a book
Between Two Ages, Americas Role in the Technetronic Era (Penguin Books, 1976, Massachusets).
In the book he predicted more controlled and directed society based on the development of
technology, where an elite group will play a leading role, which will take advantage of persisting social
crises to use the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under
close surveillance and control.
The use of mind control technologies was predicted as well in the publication of Strategic Studies
Institute of the U.S. Army War College, published in 1994
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=241.
The scenario for the year 2000 expected the growth of terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality and
drew a conclusion:
The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which
formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs)V it was necessary to rethink
our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies)
both international and domesticV Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated
domestic consciousness raising, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national
sovereignty changed. As technology changed the way force was applied, things such as
personal courage, face-to-face leadership, and the warfighter mentality became
irrelevant.V
Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using
the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as
potential or active, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and
focus psychological campaigns for each. So the Institute of Strategic Studies supposed
that in the year 2000 those technologies would be that advanced that it will be possible to
deprive human being of his freedom and adjust his personality to the needs of ruling elite.
Most probably those technologies were at this level already in 1994.
The attempts to make the general public acquainted with the existence of those weapons are, with
respect to the fact that it is evident that democratic public would require immediate ban of those
technologies, systematically suppressed. Vladimir Lopatin wrote:
The arms race is speeding up as a consequence of classification. Secrecy this is in
the first place the way to secure cruel control over the peopleV the way how to curtail
their creativity, turn them into biorobotsV, and that psychotronic war is already taking
place without declaration of war, secretlyV Only if the work on mind control problem is no
more covered by the screen of secrecy, extraordinariness, mysteriousness, if complex,
open scientific research with international participation, is carried out, the psychotronic
war including the use of psychotronic weapon can be prevented.
The article Informacni zbrane ohrozuji demokracii a lidstvo was deleted from the website of the Czech
internet newspaper Britske Listy (www.blisty.cz). The sharing of the original web address of the English
version of the same article Means of Information War Threaten Democracy and Mankind is
blocked on Facebook and a similar article was deleted from the webpage of the Australian magazine
New Dawn.
There exist no legislations punishing the use of those technologies by governments. Only in Russia and
some of the states in the USA there are legislations punishing the ownership or trading with those
technologies by non governmental entities. For example in the state of Michigan the sentence for this
crime is equal to the sentence for ownership or trading with weapons of mass destruction.
The readers who will be reached by this article and prefer democratic political system would help its
preservation if they forwarded the article to their friends.
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

Become a Member of Global Research
4057
Like
3.6k
393
286
22.2K
Articles by:
Mojmir Babacek
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be
responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post
original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright
5/24/2015 8:23 AM
5 of 5
must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for
research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright Mojmir Babacek, Global Research, 2014
Global Research News
Themes
I-BOOKS SERIES
US NATO War Agenda
Militarization and WMD
USA
Countries Index
Global Economy
Oil and Energy
Canada
Authors Index
Crimes against Humanity
Police State & Civil Rights
Middle East & North Africa
Most Popular
Militarization and WMD
Politics and Religion
Latin America & Caribbean
Law and Justice
Poverty & Social Inequality
Europe
Police State & Civil Rights
Science and Medicine
sub-Saharan Africa
Contact
Culture, Society & History
United Nations
Russia and FSU
Membership
9/11 & War on Terrorism
US NATO War Agenda
Asia
Online Store
Media Disinformation
Womens Rights
Oceania
Links
Geographic Regions
Privacy Policy
Copyright 2005-2015 GlobalResearch.ca
5/24/2015 8:23 AM
Mind Games
1 of 13
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR...
Mind Games
New on the Internet: a community of people who believe
the government is beaming voices into their minds. They
may be crazy, but the Pentagon has pursued a weapon that
can do just that.
By Sharon Weinberger
Sunday, January 14, 2007
IF HARLAN GIRARD IS CRAZY, HE DOESN'T ACT

THE PART. He is standing just where he said he would be,
below the Philadelphia train station's World War II
memorial -- a soaring statue of a winged angel embracing a
fallen combatant, as if lifting him to heaven. Girard is
wearing pressed khaki pants, expensive-looking leather
loafers and a crisp blue button-down. He looks like a local businessman dressed for a casual Friday -- a local
businessman with a wickedly dark sense of humor, which had become apparent when he said to look for him
beneath "the angel sodomizing a dead soldier." At 70, he appears robust and healthy -- not the slightest bit
disheveled or unusual-looking. He is also carrying a bag.
Girard's description of himself is matter-of-fact, until he explains what's in the bag: documents he believes
prove that the government is attempting to control his mind. He carries that black, weathered bag everywhere
he goes. "Every time I go out, I'm prepared to come home and find everything is stolen," he says.
The bag aside, Girard appears intelligent and coherent. At a table in front of Dunkin' Donuts inside the train
station, Girard opens the bag and pulls out a thick stack of documents, carefully labeled and sorted with
yellow sticky notes bearing neat block print. The documents are an authentic-looking mix of news stories,
articles culled from military journals and even some declassified national security documents that do seem to
show that the U.S. government has attempted to develop weapons that send voices into people's heads.
"It's undeniable that the technology exists," Girard says, "but if you go to the police and say, 'I'm hearing
voices,' they're going to lock you up for psychiatric evaluation."
The thing that's missing from his bag -- the lack of which makes it hard to prove he isn't crazy -- is even a
single document that would buttress the implausible notion that the government is currently targeting a large
group of American citizens with mind-control technology. The only direct evidence for that, Girard admits,
lies with alleged victims such as himself.
And of those, there are many.
IT'S 9:01 P.M. WHEN THE FIRST PERSON SPEAKS during the Saturday conference call.
Unsure whether anyone else is on the line yet, the female caller throws out the first question: "You got gang
stalking or V2K?" she asks no one in particular.
There's a short, uncomfortable pause.
"V2K, really bad. 24-7," a man replies.
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
2 of 13
"Gang stalking," another woman says.

"Oh, yeah, join the club," yet another man replies.
The members of this confessional "club" are not your usual victims. This isn't a group for alcoholics, drug
addicts or survivors of childhood abuse; the people connecting on the call are self-described victims of mind
control -- people who believe they have been targeted by a secret government program that tracks them
around the clock, using technology to probe and control their minds.
The callers frequently refer to themselves as TIs, which is short for Targeted Individuals, and talk about V2K
-- the official military abbreviation stands for "voice to skull" and denotes weapons that beam voices or
sounds into the head. In their esoteric lexicon, "gang stalking" refers to the belief that they are being followed
and harassed: by neighbors, strangers or colleagues who are agents for the government.
A few more "hellos" are exchanged, interrupted by beeps signaling late arrivals: Bill from Columbus, Barbara
from Philadelphia, Jim from California and a dozen or so others.
Derrick Robinson, the conference call moderator, calls order.
"It's five after 9," says Robinson, with the sweetly reasonable intonation of a late-night radio host. "Maybe we
should go ahead and start."
THE IDEA OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE CONVINCED THEY ARE TARGETED BY WEAPONS that can
invade their minds has become a cultural joke, shorthanded by the image of solitary lunatics wearing tinfoil
hats to deflect invisible mind beams. "Tinfoil hat," says Wikipedia, has become "a popular stereotype and
term of derision; the phrase serves as a byword for paranoia and is associated with conspiracy theorists."
In 2005, a group of MIT students conducted a formal study using aluminum foil and radio signals. Their
surprising finding: Tinfoil hats may actually amplify radio frequency signals. Of course, the tech students
meant the study as a joke.
But during the Saturday conference call, the subject of aluminum foil is deadly serious. The MIT study had
prompted renewed debate; while a few TIs realized it was a joke at their expense, some saw the findings as an
explanation for why tinfoil didn't seem to stop the voices. Others vouched for the material.
"Tinfoil helps tremendously," reports one conference call participant, who describes wrapping it around her
body underneath her clothing.
"Where do you put the tinfoil?" a man asks.
"Anywhere, everywhere," she replies. "I even put it in a hat."
A TI in an online mind-control forum recommends a Web site called "Block EMF" (as in electromagnetic
frequencies), which advertises a full line of clothing, including aluminum-lined boxer shorts described as a
"sheer, comfortable undergarment you can wear over your regular one to shield yourself from power lines and
computer electric fields, and microwave, radar, and TV radiation." Similarly, a tinfoil hat disguised as a
regular baseball cap is "smart and subtle."
For all the scorn, the ranks of victims -- or people who believe they are victims -- are speaking up. In the
course of the evening, there are as many as 40 clicks from people joining the call, and much larger numbers
participate in the online forum, which has 143 members. A note there mentioning interest from a journalist
prompted more than 200 e-mail responses.
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
3 of 13
Until recently, people who believe the government is beaming voices into their heads would have added social
isolation to their catalogue of woes. But now, many have discovered hundreds, possibly thousands, of others
just like them all over the world. Web sites dedicated to electronic harassment and gang stalking have popped
up in India, China, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Russia and elsewhere. Victims have begun to
host support meetings in major cities, including Washington. Favorite topics at the meetings include lessons
on how to build shields (the proverbial tinfoil hats), media and PR training, and possible legal strategies for
outlawing mind control.
The biggest hurdle for TIs is getting people to take their concerns seriously. A proposal made in 2001 by Rep.
Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban "psychotronic weapons" (another common term for mind-control
technology) was hailed by TIs as a great step forward. But the bill was widely derided by bloggers and
columnists and quickly dropped.
Doug Gordon, Kucinich's spokesman, would not discuss mind control other than to say the proposal was part
of broader legislation outlawing weapons in space. The bill was later reintroduced, minus the mind control. "It
was not the concentration of the legislation, which is why it was tightened up and redrafted," was all Gordon
would say.
Unable to garner much support from their elected representatives, TIs have started their own PR campaign.
And so, last spring, the Saturday conference calls centered on plans to hold a rally in Washington. A 2005
attempt at a rally drew a few dozen people and was ultimately rained out; the TIs were determined to make
another go of it. Conversations focused around designing T-shirts, setting up congressional appointments,
fundraising, creating a new Web site and formalizing a slogan. After some debate over whether to focus on
gang stalking or mind control, the group came up with a compromise slogan that covered both: "Freedom
From Covert Surveillance and Electronic Harassment."
Conference call moderator Robinson, who says his gang stalking began when he worked at the National
Security Agency in the 1980s, offers his assessment of the group's prospects: Maybe this rally wouldn't
produce much press, but it's a first step. "I see this as a movement," he says. "We're picking up people all the
time."
HARLAN GIRARD SAYS HIS PROBLEMS BEGAN IN 1983, while he was a real estate developer in Los
Angeles. The harassment was subtle at first: One day a woman pulled up in a car, wagged her finger at him,
then sped away; he saw people running underneath his window at night; he noticed some of his neighbors
seemed to be watching him; he heard someone moving in the crawl space under his apartment at night.
Girard sought advice from this then-girlfriend, a practicing psychologist, whom he declines to identify. He
says she told him, "Nobody can become psychotic in their late 40s." She said he didn't seem to manifest other
symptoms of psychotic behavior -- he dressed well, paid his bills -- and, besides his claims of surveillance,
which sounded paranoid, he behaved normally. "People who are psychotic are socially isolated," he recalls
her saying.
After a few months, Girard says, the harassment abruptly stopped. But the respite didn't last. In 1984,
appropriately enough, things got seriously weird. He'd left his real estate career to return to school at the
University of Pennsylvania, where he was studying for a master's degree in landscape architecture. He
harbored dreams of designing parks and public spaces. Then, he says, he began to hear voices. Girard could
distinguish several different male voices, which came complete with a mental image of how the voices were
being generated: from a recording studio, with "four slops sitting around a card table drinking beer," he says.
The voices were crass but also strangely courteous, addressing him as "Mr. Girard."
They taunted him. They asked him if he thought he was normal; they suggested he was going crazy. They
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
4 of 13
insulted his classmates: When an overweight student showed up for a field trip in a white raincoat, they said,
"Hey, Mr. Girard, doesn't she look like a refrigerator?"
Six months after the voices began, they had another question for him: "Mr. Girard, Mr. Girard. Why aren't
you dead yet?" At first, he recalls, the voices would speak just two or three times a day, but it escalated into a
near-constant cacophony, often accompanied by severe pain all over his body -- which Girard now attributes
to directed-energy weapons that can shoot invisible beams.
The voices even suggested how he could figure out what was happening to him. He says they told him to go to
the electrical engineering department to "tell them you're writing science fiction and you don't want to write
anything inconsistent with physical reality. Then tell them exactly what has happened."
Girard went and got some rudimentary explanations of how technology could explain some of the things he
was describing.
"Finally, I said: 'Look, I must come to the point, because I need answers. This is happening to me; it's not
science fiction.'" They laughed.
He got the same response from friends, he says. "They regarded me as crazy, which is a humiliating
experience."
When asked why he didn't consult a doctor about the voices and the pain, he says, "I don't dare start talking
to people because of the potential stigma of it all. I don't want to be treated differently. Here I was in
Philadelphia. Something was going on, I don't know any doctors . . . I know somebody's doing something to
me."
It was a struggle to graduate, he says, but he was determined, and he persevered. In 1988, the same year he
finished his degree, his father died, leaving Girard an inheritance large enough that he did not have to work.
So, instead of becoming a landscape architect, Girard began a full-time investigation of what was happening
to him, often traveling to Washington in pursuit of government documents relating to mind control. He put an
ad in a magazine seeking other victims. Only a few people responded. But over the years, as he met more and
more people like himself, he grew convinced that he was part of what he calls an "electronic concentration
camp."
What he was finding on his research trips also buttressed his belief: Girard learned that in the 1950s, the CIA
had drugged unwitting victims with LSD as part of a rogue mind-control experiment called MK-ULTRA. He
came across references to the CIA seeking to influence the mind with electromagnetic fields. Then he found
references in an academic research book to work that military researchers at Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research had done in the 1970s with pulsed microwaves to transmit words that a subject would hear in his
head. Elsewhere, he came across references to attempts to use electromagnetic energy, sound waves or
microwave beams to cause non-lethal pain to the body. For every symptom he experienced, he believed he
found references to a weapon that could cause it.
How much of the research Girard cites checks out?
Concerns about microwaves and mind control date to the 1960s, when the U.S. government discovered that
its embassy in Moscow was being bombarded by low-level electromagnetic radiation. In 1965, according to
declassified Defense Department documents, the Pentagon, at the behest of the White House, launched
Project Pandora, top-secret research to explore the behavioral and biological effects of low-level microwaves.
For approximately four years, the Pentagon conducted secret research: zapping monkeys; exposing unwitting
sailors to microwave radiation; and conducting a host of other unusual experiments (a sub-project of Project
Pandora was titled Project Bizarre). The results were mixed, and the program was plagued by disagreements
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
5 of 13
and scientific squabbles. The "Moscow signal," as it was called, was eventually attributed to eavesdropping,
not mind control, and Pandora ended in 1970. And with it, the military's research into so-called non-thermal
microwave effects seemed to die out, at least in the unclassified realm.
But there are hints of ongoing research: An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s
mentions the idea of a weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person's head. "The signal
can be a 'message from God' that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to
surrender," the author concluded.
In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send
words into someone's head. That work is frequently cited on mind-control Web sites. Rich Garcia, a
spokesman for the research laboratory's directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or current
or related research in the field, citing the lab's policy not to comment on its microwave work.
In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified
documents surrounding that 2002 patent -- records that note that the patent was based on human
experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the
heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility. Research appeared to continue at least through
2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear -- the research laboratory, citing classification, refused to
discuss it or release other materials.
The official U.S. Air Force position is that there are no non-thermal effects of microwaves. Yet Dennis
Bushnell, chief scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center, tagged microwave attacks against the human
brain as part of future warfare in a 2001 presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association about
"Future Strategic Issues."
"That work is exceedingly sensitive" and unlikely to be reported in any unclassified documents, he says.
Meanwhile, the military's use of weapons that employ electromagnetic radiation to create pain is well-known,
as are some of the limitations of such weapons. In 2001, the Pentagon declassified one element of this
research: the Active Denial System, a weapon that uses electromagnetic radiation to heat skin and create an
intense burning sensation. So, yes, there is technology designed to beam painful invisible rays at humans, but
the weapon seems to fall far short of what could account for many of the TIs' symptoms. While its exact
range is classified, Doug Beason, an expert in directed-energy weapons, puts it at about 700 meters, and the
beam cannot penetrate a number of materials, such as aluminum. Considering the size of the full-scale
weapon, which resembles a satellite dish, and its operational limitations, the ability of the government or
anyone else to shoot beams at hundreds of people -- on city streets, into their homes and while they travel in
cars and planes -- is beyond improbable.
But, given the history of America's clandestine research, it's reasonable to assume that if the defense
establishment could develop mind-control or long-distance ray weapons, it almost certainly would. And, once
developed, the possibility that they might be tested on innocent civilians could not be categorically dismissed.
Girard, for his part, believes these weapons were not only developed but were also tested on him more than
20 years ago.
What would the government gain by torturing him? Again, Girard found what he believed to be an
explanation, or at least a precedent: During the Cold War, the government conducted radiation experiments
on scores of unwitting victims, essentially using them as human guinea pigs. Girard came to believe that he,
too, was a walking experiment.
Not that Girard thinks his selection was totally random: He believes he was targeted because of a disparaging
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
6 of 13
remark he made to a Republican fundraiser about George H.W. Bush in the early 1980s. Later, Girard says,
the voices confirmed his suspicion.
"One night I was going to bed; the usual drivel was going on," he says. "The constant stream of drivel. I was
just about to go to bed, and a voice says: 'Mr. Girard, do you know who was in our studio with us? That was
George Bush, vice president of the United States.'"
GIRARD'S STORY, HOWEVER STRANGE, reflects what TIs around the world report: a chance encounter
with a government agency or official, followed by surveillance and gang stalking, and then, in many cases,
voices, and pain similar to electric shocks. Some in the community have taken it upon themselves to
document as many cases as possible. One TI from California conducted about 50 interviews, narrowing the
symptoms down to several major areas: "ringing in the ears," "manipulation of body parts," "hearing voices,"
"piercing sensation on skin," "sinus problems" and "sexual attacks." In fact, the TI continued, "many report
the sensation of having their genitalia manipulated."
Both male and female TIs report a variety of "attacks" to their sexual organs. "My testicles became so sore I
could barely walk," Girard says of his early experiences. Others, however, report the attacks in the form of
sexual stimulation, including one TI who claims he dropped out of the seminary after constant sexual
stimulation by directed-energy weapons. Susan Sayler, a TI in San Diego, says many women among the TIs
suffer from attacks to their sexual organs but are often embarrassed to talk about it with outsiders.
"It's sporadic, you just never know when it will happen," she says. "A lot of the women say it's as soon as you
lay down in bed -- that's when you would get hit the worst. It happened to me as I was driving, at odd times."
What made her think it was an electronic attack and not just in her head? "There was no sexual attraction to a
man when it would happen. That's what was wrong. It did not feel like a muscle spasm or whatever," she says.
"It's so . . . electronic."
Gloria Naylor, a renowned African American writer, seems to defy many of the stereotypes of someone who
believes in mind control. A winner of the National Book Award, Naylor is best known for her acclaimed
novel, The Women of Brewster Place, which described a group of women living in a poor urban
neighborhood and was later made into a miniseries by Oprah Winfrey.
But in 2005, she published a lesser-known work, 1996, a semi-autobiographical book describing her
experience as a TI. "I didn't want to tell this story. It's going to take courage. Perhaps more courage than I
possess, but they've left me no alternatives," Naylor writes at the beginning of her book. "I am in a battle for
my mind. If I stop now, they'll have won, and I will lose myself." The book is coherent, if hard to believe. It's
also marked by disturbing passages describing how Jewish American agents were responsible for Naylor's
surveillance. "Of the many cars that kept coming and going down my road, most were driven by Jews," she
writes in the book. When asked about that passage in a recent interview, she defended her logic: Being from
New York, she claimed, she can recognize Jews.
Naylor lives on a quiet street in Brooklyn in a majestic brownstone with an interior featuring intricate
woodwork and tasteful decorations that attest to a successful literary career. She speaks about her situation
calmly, occasionally laughing at her own predicament and her struggle with what she originally thought was
mental illness. "I would observe myself," she explains. "I would lie in bed while the conversations were going
on, and I'd ask: Maybe it is schizophrenia?"
Like Girard, Naylor describes what she calls "street theater" -- incidents that might be dismissed by others as
coincidental, but which Naylor believes were set up. She noticed suspicious cars driving by her isolated
vacation home. On an airplane, fellow passengers mimicked her every movement -- like mimes on a street.
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
7 of 13
Voices similar to those in Girard's case followed -- taunting voices cursing her, telling her she was stupid, that
she couldn't write. Expletive-laced language filled her head. Naylor sought help from a psychiatrist and
received a prescription for an antipsychotic drug. But the medication failed to stop the voices, she says, which
only added to her conviction that the harassment was real.
For almost four years, Naylor says, the voices prevented her from writing. In 2000, she says, around the time
she discovered the mind-control forums, the voices stopped and the surveillance tapered off. It was then that
she began writing 1996 as a "catharsis."
Colleagues urged Naylor not to publish the book, saying she would destroy her reputation. But she did
publish, albeit with a small publishing house. The book was generally ignored by critics but embraced by TIs.
Naylor is not the first writer to describe such a personal descent. Evelyn Waugh, one of the great novelists of
the 20th century, details similar experiences in The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold. Waugh's book, published in
1957, has eerie similarities to Naylor's.
Embarking on a recuperative cruise, Pinfold begins to hear voices on the ship that he believes are part of a
wireless system capable of broadcasting into his head; he believes the instigator recruited fellow passengers to
act as operatives; and he describes "performances" put on by passengers directed at him yet meant to look
innocuous to others.
Waugh wrote his book several years after recovering from a similar episode and realizing that the voices and
paranoia were the result of drug-induced hallucinations.
Naylor, who hasn't written a book since 1996, is now back at work on an historical novel she hopes will return
her to the literary mainstream. She remains convinced that she was targeted by mind control. The many
echoes of her ordeal she sees on the mind-control forums reassure her she's not crazy, she says.
Of course, some of the things she sees on the forum do strike her as crazy. "But who I am to say?" she says.
"Maybe I sound crazy to somebody else."
SOME TIS, SUCH AS ED MOORE, A YOUNG MEDICAL DOCTOR, take a slightly more skeptical
approach. He criticizes what he calls the "wacky claims" of TIs who blame various government agencies or
groups of people without any proof. "I have yet to see a claim of who is behind this that has any data to
support it," he writes.
Nonetheless, Moore still believes the voices in his head are the result of mind control and that the U.S.
government is the most likely culprit. Moore started hearing voices in 2003, just as he completed his medical
residency in anesthesiology; he was pulling an all-nighter studying for board exams when he heard voices
coming from a nearby house commenting on him, on his abilities as a doctor, on his sanity. At first, he thought
he was simply overhearing conversations through walls (much as Waugh's fictional alter ego first thought),
but when no one else could hear the voices, he realized they were in his head. Moore went through a
traumatic two years, including hospitalization for depression with auditory hallucinations.
"One tries to convince friends and family that you are being electronically harassed with voices that only you
can hear," he writes in an e-mail. "You learn to stop doing that. They don't believe you, and they become sad
and concerned, and it amplifies your own depression when you have voices screaming at you and your friends
and family looking at you as a helpless, sick, mentally unbalanced wreck."
He says he grew frustrated with anti-psychotic medications meant to stop the voices, both because the
treatments didn't work and because psychiatrists showed no interest in what the voices were telling him. He
began to look for some other way to cope.
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
8 of 13
"In March of 2005, I started looking up support groups on the Internet," he wrote. "My wife would cry when
she would see these sites, knowing I still heard voices, but I did not know what else to do." In 2006, he says,
his wife, who had stood by him for three years, filed for divorce.
Moore, like other TIs, is cautious about sharing details of his life. He worries about looking foolish to friends
and colleagues -- but he says that risk is ultimately worthwhile if he can bring attention to the issue.
With his father's financial help, Moore is now studying for an electrical engineering degree at the University
of Texas at San Antonio, hoping to prove that V2K, the technology to send voices into people's heads, is real.
Being in school, around other people, helps him cope, he writes, but the voices continue to taunt him.
Recently, he says, they told him: "We'll never stop [messing] with you."
A WEEK BEFORE THE TIS RALLY ON THE NATIONAL MALL, John Alexander, one of the people
whom Harlan Girard holds personally responsible for the voices in his head, is at a Chili's restaurant in Crystal
City explaining over a Philly cheese steak and fries why the United States needs mind-control weapons.
A former Green Beret who served in Vietnam, Alexander went on to a number of national security jobs, and
rubbed shoulders with prominent military and political leaders. Long known for taking an interest in exotic
weapons, his 1980 article, "The New Mental Battlefield," published in the Army journal Military Review, is
cited by self-described victims as proof of his complicity in mind control. Now retired from the government
and living in Las Vegas, Alexander continues to advise the military. He is in the Washington area that day for
an official meeting.
Beneath a shock of white hair is the mind of a self-styled military thinker. Alexander belongs to a particular
set of Pentagon advisers who consider themselves defense intellectuals, focusing on big-picture issues, future
threats and new capabilities. Alexander's career led him from work on sticky foam that would stop an enemy
in his or her tracks to dalliances in paranormal studies and psychics, which he still defends as operationally
useful.
In an earlier phone conversation, Alexander said that in the 1990s, when he took part in briefings at the CIA,
there was never any talk of "mind control, or mind-altering drugs or technologies, or anything like that."
According to Alexander, the military and intelligence agencies were still scared by the excesses of
MK-ULTRA, the infamous CIA program that involved, in part, slipping LSD to unsuspecting victims. "Until
recently, anything that smacked of [mind control] was extremely dangerous" because Congress would simply
take the money away, he said.
Alexander acknowledged that "there were some abuses that took place," but added that, on the whole, "I
would argue we threw the baby out with the bath water."
But September 11, 2001, changed the mood in Washington, and some in the national security community are
again expressing interest in mind control, particularly a younger generation of officials who weren't around for
MK-ULTRA. "It's interesting, that it's coming back," Alexander observed.
While Alexander scoffs at the notion that he is somehow part of an elaborate plot to control people's minds,
he acknowledges support for learning how to tap into a potential enemy's brain. He gives as an example the
possible use of functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, for lie detection. "Brain mapping" with fMRI
theoretically could allow interrogators to know when someone is lying by watching for activity in particular
parts of the brain. For interrogating terrorists, fMRI could come in handy, Alexander suggests. But any
conceivable use of the technique would fall far short of the kind of mind-reading TIs complain about.
Alexander also is intrigued by the possibility of using electronic means to modify behavior. The dilemma of
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
9 of 13
the war on terrorism, he notes, is that it never ends. So what do you do with enemies, such as those at
Guantanamo: keep them there forever? That's impractical. Behavior modification could be an alternative, he
says.
"Maybe I can fix you, or electronically neuter you, so it's safe to release you into society, so you won't come
back and kill me," Alexander says. It's only a matter of time before technology allows that scenario to come
true, he continues. "We're now getting to where we can do that." He pauses for a moment to take a bite of his
sandwich. "Where does that fall in the ethics spectrum? That's a really tough question."
When Alexander encounters a query he doesn't want to answer, such as one about the ethics of mind control,
he smiles and raises his hands level to his chest, as if balancing two imaginary weights. In one hand is mind
control and the sanctity of free thought -- and in the other hand, a tad higher -- is the war on terrorism.
But none of this has anything to do with the TIs, he says. "Just because things are secret, people tend to
extrapolate. Common sense does not prevail, and even when you point out huge leaps in logic that just cannot
be true, they are not dissuaded."
WHAT IS IT THAT BRINGS SOMEONE, EVEN AN INTELLIGENT PERSON, to ascribe the experience of
hearing disembodied voices to government weapons?
In her book, Abducted, Harvard psychologist Susan Clancy examines a group that has striking parallels to the
TIs: people who believe they've been kidnapped by aliens. The similarities are often uncanny: Would-be
abductees describe strange pains, and feelings of being watched or targeted. And although the alleged
abductees don't generally have auditory hallucinations, they do sometimes believe that their thoughts are
controlled by aliens, or that they've been implanted with advanced technology.
(On the online forum, some TIs posted vociferous objections to the parallel, concerned that the public finds
UFOs even weirder than mind control. "It will keep us all marginalized and discredited," one griped.)
Clancy argues that the main reason people believe they've been abducted by aliens is that it provides them
with a compelling narrative to explain their perception that strange things have happened to them, such as
marks on their bodies (marks others would simply dismiss as bruises), stimulation to their sexual organs (as
the TIs describe) or feelings of paranoia. "It's not just an explanation for your problems; it's a source of
meaning for your life," Clancy says.
In the case of TIs, mind-control weapons are an explanation for the voices they hear in their head. Socrates
heard a voice and thought it was a demon; Joan of Arc heard voices from God. As one TI noted in an e-mail:
"Each person undergoing this harassment is looking for the solution to the problem. Each person analyzes it
through his or her own particular spectrum of beliefs. If you are a scientific-minded person, then you will
probably analyze the situation from that perspective and conclude it must be done with some kind of
electronic devices. If you are a religious person, you will see it as a struggle between the elements of
whatever religion you believe in. If you are maybe, perhaps more eccentric, you may think that it is alien in
nature."
Or, if you happen to live in the United States in the early 21st century, you may fear the growing power of the
NSA, CIA and FBI.
Being a victim of government surveillance is also, arguably, better than being insane. In Waugh's novella
based on his own painful experience, when Pinfold concludes that hidden technology is being used to
infiltrate his brain, he "felt nothing but gratitude in his discovery." Why? "He might be unpopular; he might be
ridiculous; but he was not mad."
Ralph Hoffman, a professor of psychiatry at Yale who has studied auditory hallucinations, regularly sees
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
10 of 13
people who believe the voices are a part of government harassment (others believe they are God, dead
relatives or even ex-girlfriends). Not all people who hear voices are schizophrenic, he says, noting that people
can hear voices episodically in highly emotional states. What exactly causes these voices is still unknown, but
one thing is certain: People who think the voices are caused by some external force are rarely dissuaded from
their delusional belief, he says. "These are highly emotional and gripping experiences that are so compelling
for them that ordinary reality seems bland."
Perhaps because the experience is so vivid, he says, even some of those who improve through treatment
merely decide the medical regimen somehow helped protect their brain from government weapons.
Scott Temple, a professor of psychiatry at Penn State University who has been involved in two recent studies
of auditory hallucinations, notes that those who suffer such hallucinations frequently lack insight into their
illness. Even among those who do understand they are sick, "that awareness comes and goes," he says.
"People feel overwhelmed, and the delusional interpretations return."
BACK AT THE PHILADELPHIA TRAIN STATION, Girard seems more agitated. In a meeting the week
before, his "handlers" had spoken to him only briefly -- they weren't in the right position to attack him, Girard
surmises, based on the lack of voices. Today, his conversation jumps more rapidly from one subject to the
next: victims of radiation experiments, his hatred of George H.W. Bush, MK-ULTRA, his personal
experiences.
Asked about his studies at Penn, he replies by talking about his problems with reading: "I told you, everything
I write they dictate to me," he says, referring again to the voices. "When I read, they're reading to me. My
eyes go across; they're moving my eyes down the line. They're reading it to me. When I close the book, I can't
remember a thing I read. That's why they do it."
The week before, Girard had pointed to only one person who appeared suspicious to him -- a young African
American man reading a book; this time, however, he hears more voices, which leads him to believe the
station is crawling with agents.
"Let's change our location," Girard says after a while. "I'm sure they have 40 or 50 people in here today. I
escaped their surveillance last time -- they won't let that happen again."
Asked to explain the connection between mind control and the University of Pennsylvania, which Girard
alleges is involved in the conspiracy, he begins to talk about defense contractors located near the Philadelphia
campus: "General Electric was right next to the parking garage; General Electric Space Systems occupies a
huge building right over there. From that building, you could see into the studio where I was doing my work
most of the time. I asked somebody what they were doing there. You know, it had to do with computers. GE
Space Systems. They were supposed to be tracking missile debris from this location . . . pardon me. What was
your question again?"
Yet many parts of Girard's life seem to reflect that of any affluent 70-year-old bachelor. He travels frequently
to France for extended vacations and takes part in French cultural activities in Philadelphia. He has set up a
travel scholarship at the Cleveland Institute of Art in the name of his late mother, who attended school there
(he changed his last name 27 years ago for "personal reasons"), and he travels to meet the students who
benefit from the fund. And while the bulk of his time is spent on his research and writing about mind control,
he has other interests. He follows politics and describes outings with friends and family members with whom
he doesn't talk about mind control, knowing they would view it skeptically.
Girard acknowledges that some of his experiences mirror symptoms of schizophrenia, but asked if he ever
worried that the voices might in fact be caused by mental illness, he answers sharply with one word: "No."
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
11 of 13
How, then, does he know the voices are real?

"How do you know you know anything?" Girard replies. "How do you know I exist? How do you know this
isn't a dream you're having, from which you'll wake up in a few minutes? I suppose that analogy is the closest
thing: You know when you have a dream. Sometimes it could be perfectly lucid, but you know it's a dream."
The very "realness" of the voices is the issue -- how do you disbelieve something you perceive as real? That's
precisely what Hoffman, the Yale psychiatrist, points out: So lucid are the voices that the sufferers -regardless of their educational level or self-awareness -- are unable to see them as anything but real. "One
thing I can assure you," Hoffman says, "is that for them, it feels real."
IT LOOKS ALMOST LIKE ANY OTHER SMALL POLITICAL RALLY IN WASHINGTON. Posters adorn
the gate on the southwest side of the Capitol Reflecting Pool, as attendees set up a table with press materials,
while volunteers test a loudspeaker and set out coolers filled with bottled water. The sun is out, the weather is
perfect, and an eclectic collection of people from across the country has gathered to protest mind control.
There is not a tinfoil hat to be seen. Only the posters and paraphernalia hint at the unusual. "Stop USA
electronic harassment," urges one poster. "Directed Energy Assaults," reads another. Smaller signs in the
shape of tombstones say, "RIP MKULTRA." The main display, set in front of the speaker's lectern has a more
extended message: "HELP STOP HI-TECH ASSAULT PSYCHOTRONIC TORTURE."
About 35 TIs show up for the June rally, in addition to a few friends and family members. Speakers alternate
between giving personal testimonials and descriptions of research into mind-control technology. Most of the
gawkers at the rally are foreign tourists. A few hecklers snicker at the signs, but mostly people are either
confused or indifferent. The articles on mind control at the table -- from mainstream news magazines -- go
untouched.
"How can you expect people to get worked up over this if they don't care about eavesdropping or eminent
domain?" one man challenges after stopping to flip through the literature. Mary Ann Stratton, who is manning
the table, merely shrugs and smiles sadly. There is no answer: Everyone at the rally acknowledges it is an
uphill battle.
In general, the outlook for TIs is not good; many lose their jobs, houses and family. Depression is common.
But for many at the rally, experiencing the community of mind-control victims seems to help. One TI, a man
who had been a rescue swimmer in the Coast Guard before voices in his head sent him on a downward spiral,
expressed the solace he found among fellow TIs in a long e-mail to another TI: "I think that the only people
that can help are people going through the same thing. Everyone else will not believe you, or they are possibly
involved."
In the end, though, nothing could help him enough. In August 2006, he would commit suicide.
But at least for the day, the rally is boosting TI spirits. Girard, in what for him is an ebullient mood, takes the
microphone. A small crowd of tourists gathers at the sidelines, listening with casual interest. With the Capitol
looming behind him, he reaches the crescendo of his speech, rallying the attendees to remember an important
thing: They are part of a single community.
"I've heard it said, 'We can't get anywhere because everyone's story is different.' We are all the same," Girard
booms. "You knew someone with the power to commit you to the electronic concentration camp system."
Several weeks after the rally, Girard shows up for a meeting with a reporter at the stately Mayflower Hotel in
Washington, where he has stayed frequently over the two decades he has traveled to the capital to battle
mind control. He walks in with a lit cigarette, which he apologetically puts out after a hotel employee tells him
smoking isn't allowed anymore. He is half an hour late -- delayed, he says, by a meeting on Capitol Hill.
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
12 of 13
Wearing a monogrammed dress shirt and tie, he looks, as always, serious and professional.
Girard declines to mention whom on Capitol Hill he'd met with, other than to say it was a congressional
staffer. Embarrassment is likely a factor: Girard readily acknowledges that most people he meets with,
ranging from scholars to politicians, ignore his entreaties or dismiss him as a lunatic.
Lately, his focus is on his Web site, which he sees as the culmination of nearly a quarter-century of research.
When completed, it will contain more than 300 pages of documents. What next? Maybe he'll move to France
(there are victims there, too), or maybe the U.S. government will finally just kill him, he says.
Meanwhile, he is always searching for absolute proof that the government has decoded the brain. His latest
interest is LifeLog, a project once funded by the Pentagon that he read about in Wired News. The article
described it this way: "The embryonic LifeLog program would dump everything an individual does into a
giant database: every e-mail sent or received, every picture taken, every Web page surfed, every phone call
made, every TV show watched, every magazine read. All of this -- and more -- would combine with
information gleaned from a variety of sources: a GPS transmitter to keep tabs on where that person went,
audiovisual sensors to capture what he or she sees or says, and biomedical monitors to keep track of the
individual's health."
Girard suggests that the government, using similar technology, has "catalogued" his life over the past two
years -- every sight and sound (Evelyn Waugh, in his mind-control book, writes about his character's similar
fear that his harassers were creating a file of his entire life).
Girard thinks the government can control his movements, inject thoughts into his head, cause him pain day
and night. He believes that he will die a victim of mind control.
Is there any reason for optimism?
Girard hesitates, then asks a rhetorical question.
"Why, despite all this, why am I the same person? Why am I Harlan Girard?"
For all his anguish, be it the result of mental illness or, as Girard contends, government mind control, the
voices haven't managed to conquer the thing that makes him who he is: Call it his consciousness, his intellect
or, perhaps, his soul.
"That's what they don't yet have," he says. After 22 years, "I'm still me."
Sharon Weinberger is a Washington writer and author of Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the
Pentagon's Scientific Underworld. She will be fielding questions and comments about this article Tuesday at
washingtonpost.com/liveonline.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
2007 The Washington Post Company
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
Mind Games
13 of 13
Sponsored Links
Today ONLY: iPads Being Sold for $17.98
High-ticket items like iPads are being auctioned for 95% off!
NewsChan7.com
SHOCKING: Overstock LED TVs for $84.95
BREAKING NEWS: Online auction site to give away 1,000 TVs for $84.95!
www.channel4newstoday.com
How to Fall Asleep?
Cambridge Researchers have developed an all natural sleep aid just for you.
HealthHeadlines.com
Buy a link here
11/28/2010 1:04 PM
ICOMW
1 of 1
http://www.icomw.org/archive.asp
Document Archive
Dear Visitor:
In 1990 I became interested in whether the U.S. Government was conducting any classified
research on unconsenting human subjects and placed advertisements in two progressive
publications to find out. Of course, I was concerned that I might be deluged with hordes of
stories concocted by psychology graduate students, but I needn't have been.
I believe altogether I received seven replies over about as many months. Two of these were
congratulatory responses from persons who had harbored the same curiosity that led me to
place the ads. Five of the replies were from persons who had every reason to believe they were
the subjects of unconsented human research, one of which was from a woman who had
undergone a terrible ordeal at the hands of the Central Intelligence Agency forty years earlier,
an ordeal for which, incidentally, she had received no compensation whatsoever.
From this small beginning, by August of 1994 I had collected 28 cases in all of involuntary
human subject research. Then the cases began to multiply exponentially, as did the
documents I was collecting in an effort to reverse engineer the apparatus necessary to
produce the effects being reported.
The simplest possible explanation consistent with all of the casework and research we have
done is that yes, indeed, the United States has had an Electronic Concentration Camp System
(ECCS) up and running for 30 years now; that like its Nazi predecessors it is a system of
containment, surveillance, labor, torture and death; and that the websites and chat rooms
proclaiming as much are to be trusted no matter how subjectively (and imperfectly) the
persons concerned describe what is being done to them.
We are convinced that the best possible future would be to release the prisoners from the
ECCS and destroy the whole cruel, inhuman and degrading institution.
Sincerely yours,
Harlan Girard
Managing Director
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
11/28/2010 12:49 PM
ICOMW - Contact Us
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/contact.asp
Contact Us
In American criminal courts, prosecuting the crime of murder requires evidence of motive,
means and opportunity. We hope that we have presented sufficient evidence for you to
convict the United States of America of the protracted extra judicial killing of thousands of its
own citizens and those of its allies in what we call the Electronic Concentration System
(ECCS).
We have seen the intention of the United States to control the human organism by remote
electronic means. That speaks to motive. Then we have learned of the experiment conducted
in 1973 at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research with a microwave beam which was
ultimately memorialized in U.S. Patent 6,587,729. This apparatus is used for audibly
communicating speech into the brains of persons imprisoned in their own bodies - a process
known as 'synthetic telepathy'. This addresses the question of means. Lastly, we have read the
opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of the CIA vs. Sims and Wolfe,
which gave the Central Intelligence Agency a license to experiment on human beings just like
the Nazis did. This establishes opportunity.
So, dear visitor, sitting as a jury of one in our prosecution of successive American
governments of both political parties for crimes against humanity - can you convict them? We
would like to hear from you. Put an X through the box that most closely reflects your reaction
to the evidence:
Yes.
Yes. I believe I'm a prisoner in the ECCS.
Yes, but I would like to see more information regarding motive, means, opportunity.
Maybe. I didn't have time to read everything you've posted.
No. I don't like the idea that any of this might be true.
No.
Additional Comments:
At the end of 2006, we will post the results of this poll.
11/28/2010 12:48 PM
ICOMW - Afterword
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/afterword.asp
Afterword
The purpose of this website is to put before you, the public, the case for the existence of an
Electronic Concentration Camp System (ECCS) in which thousands of American citizens (and
citizens of our allies) have already died and in which, perhaps, as many as a thousand or two
still barely exist. Before the revelation of torture being used in our concentration camps at
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, we could understand the disbelief with which our
accusation was sometimes greeted. Since the revelations of torture at these sites, we fail to
understand why no other human rights organization (and that is what we consider ourselves,
despite our name) has stepped forward publicly to ask the United States Government whether
or not it is conducting unconsented human experiments at this time. Why has no one
investigated the complaints of the tortured and brainwashed people who proclaim themselves
to be victims on the various websites where they congregate? We support their cause, and to
that end have published this site.
In publishing this site, we have had to consider which of the many thousands of documents
we have assembled best makes our case. We have also considered how many documents a
reasonably curious person (with no personal experience of torture or the ECCS) might want
to read on this subject. We hope that we have reached a happy balance.
Inasmuch as we introduced ourselves through a document transcribed from remarks made by
our Managing Director before the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, we
thought we might close with another public document by him.
In the year 2000, a young European scientist was preparing an article on cell phones (which
in Europe are called mobile phones) for publication in Germany. Knowing of our work, he
asked us to reply to five written questions for his article. We don't know how much of Mr.
Girard's reply appeared in print, but we believe the opinions he expressed would have
appeared controversial or even outrageous if presented to an American audience at that time.
However, today they seem quite reasonable when compared with the truth on the ground. For
that reason, we think it would be appropriate to republish this document now in the English
language. We have not added anything to what Mr. Girard wrote, or changed even a comma.
We have deleted our own address and our telephone number at that time, the name and
address of the scientist who requested our answers, and part of one sentence from the
footnote on page 2. That is all.
- Download Afterword in full (443 KB)

Archive Introduction
11/28/2010 12:46 PM
CHAPTER III
INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS
"To understand human decisions and human behavior requires something more
than an appreciation of immediate stimuli. It requires, too, a consideration of the
totality of forces, material and spiritual, which condition, influence or direct human
responses. And because we are dealing with human beings, the forces which
helped shape their actions must be recognized as multiple, subtle, and infinitely
complex."
David Herlihy, The History of Feudalism
Introduction
Like all other aspects of joint operations, I0 requires effective intelligence support. 10 is
intelligence intensive in particular and therefore successful planning, preparation, execution,
and assessment of IO demand detailed and timely intelligence. This chapter briefly discusses
how intelligence supports the planning and execution of IO.
2.
Intelligence Support to Information Operations
Before military activities in the information environment can be planned, the current "state"
ofthe dynamic information environment must be collected, analyzed, and provided to commanders
and their staffs. This requires intelligence on relevant portions of the physical, informational,
and cognitive properties ofthe information environment, which necessitates collection and analysis
of a wide variety of information and the production of a wide variety of intelligence products as
discussed below.
a. Nature of I0 Intelligence Requirements. In order to understand the adversary or
other TA decision-making process and determine the appropriate capabilities necessary to achieve
operational objectives, commanders and their staffs must have current data. This includes relevant
physical, informational, and cognitive properties of the information environment as well as
assessment of ongoing 10 activities.
(1) Physical Properties of the Information Environment. Physical properties of
the information environment include people, places, things, and capabilities of information
infrastructure and adversary information capabilities. Examples include:
(a) Geographic coordinates of adversary information infrastructure and
capabilities.
(b) Organization of infrastructure and capabilities as well as identification of critical
links, nodes, and redundant communication infrastructure.
(c) Types, quantity, and configuration of information infrastructure and capabilities
(with specific makes, models, and numbers).
Ilk
Chapter III
(d) Organizational planning, decision, and execution processes.

(e) Enemy intelligence/feedback mechanism for gaining battlespace awareness,
information, and knowledge.
(f) Enemy computer attack, defense, and exploitation capabilities.
(2) Informational Properties of the Information Environment. Informational properties
of the information environment include those systems and networks where information is created,
processed, manipulated, transmitted, and shared. It includes those properties relevant to the electronic
collection, transmission, processing, storage, and display of information. These properties may be
electronic or human-to-human or a combination of both. They describe the formal and informal
communications infrastructure and networks, kinship and descent relationships, licit and illicit commercial
relationships and social affiliations and contacts that collectively create, process, manipulate, transmit,
and share information in an operational area and among TAs. Examples of informational properties
include:
(a) Specification, capacity, configuration, and usage of information infrastructure
and capabilities.
(b) Technical design of information infrastructure.
(c) Networks of human-to-human contact used for the transmission of information
(couriers, rat-lines, dead-drops, etc.).
(d) Social and commercial networks that process and share information and
influence (kinship and descent linkages, formal and informal social contacts, licit and illicit
commercial affiliations and records of ownership and transactions, etc.).
(e) Content and context.
(3) Cognitive Properties of the Information Environment. Cognitive properties
of the information environment are the psychological, cultural, behavioral, and other human
attributes that influence decision making, the flow of information, and the interpretation of
information by individuals or groups at any level in a state or organization. Cognitive properties
may include:
(a) Cultural and societal factors affecting attitudes and perceptions such as
language, education, history, religion, myths, personal experience, and family structure.
(b) Identity of key individuals and groups affecting attitudes and perceptions,
whether in the same or a different country as those they influence.
(c) Identity and psychological profile of key decision makers, their advisors, key
associates, and/or family members who influence them.
III-2
SP 3-13

(d) Credibility of key individuals or groups and specification oftheir sphere of influence.
(e) Laws, regulations, and procedures relevant to information and decision making,
decision-making processes, capability employment doctrine, timeliness, and information content.
(f) How leaders think, perceive, plan, execute, and assess outcomes of their results
and actions from their perspectives.
(g) Identify key historical events between the target country and the US, which
may affect an individual or group's attitudes and perceptions of the US, whether in the same or
different country as those they influence.
(4) While these broad types ofproperties ofthe information environment illustrate the diversity
of IO intelligence requirements, it is important to note that multiple sources and methods may be required
to collect physical, informational, and cognitive properties of specific collection targets in order to fuse
and analyze different properties in support oflO planning. For instance, if operational planning requires
intelligence on radio stations within an adversary country, that requirement may include the number and
location ofbroadcast and transmission facilities (physical), the technical specifications of each station
(informational), the identity ofowners and key personnel, and the credibility or popularity of each station
(cognitive).
b. Intelligence Support to I0 Planning. Intelligence support is an integral part of IO
planning. In particular, the joint intelligence preparation of the battlespace (JIPB) process provides
a valuable methodology for identifying capabilities, vulnerabilities, and critical nodes within the
information environment. JP 2-01.3, Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Joint
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace, discusses JIPB support to IC/ A sequential overview
of intelligence support to IO planning includes actions to:
(1) Identify adversary information value, use, flow, and vulnerabilities relevant to
specific types of decision making.
(2) Identify individual systems and target sets relevant to specified adversary or other
TA decision making.
(3) Identify desired effects appropriate to individual systems and target sets.
(4) Predict the consequences (non-objective related outcomes) of identified actions.
(5) Coordinate with planning personnel to establish priority of intelligence requirements.
(6) Assist in developing I0 assessment criteria during planning and then assist in
monitoring and assessing IO during execution (which may extend before and after execution of
conventional operations).
(7) Tailor assessment/feedback methodologies to specific operations.
III-3
Chapter III
(8) Evaluate the outcome of executed I0 activities/tasks.
(9) Provide assessment for 10 actions relative to JFC objectives and mission.
c. Intelligence Considerations in Planning Information Operations
(1) Information Environment Impact on Intelligence Support. The nature of the
information environment has profound implications for intelligence support to 10. Members of
the operational community and the intelligence community must understand these implications
in order to efficiently request and provide quality intelligence support to I.O. These implications
are listed below.
(a) Intelligence Resources are Limited. Information collection requirements
are almost limitless, especially for many types of 10. Commanders and their intelligence and
operations directorates must work together to identify IO intelligence requirements and ensure
that they are given high enough priority in the commander's requests to the intelligence community
(IC).
(b) Collection Activities are Legally Constrained. The nature ofthe information
environment complicates compliance with legal constraints and restraints. Thus the IC must
implement technical and procedural methods to ensure compliance with the law. Additionally,
intelligence may be supplemented with information legally provided by law enforcement or
other sources. Especially in the area of CNO, where the application of different domestic and
international laws may be unclear, close coordination among the operational, legal, and law
enforcement communities is essential.
(c) I0 Intelligence Often Requires Long Lead Times. The intelligence
necessary to affect adversary or other TA decisions often requires that specific sources and
methods be positioned and employed over time to collect the necessary information and conduct
analyses required for I0 planning. Commanders and their staffs, including 10 planners, must be
aware of the relative lead times required to develop different types of intelligence both for initial
planning and for feedback during operations. To deal with these long lead times, the commander
must provide detailed initial guidance to the staff during the mission analysis and estimate
processes.
(d) The Information Environment is Dynamic. The information environment
changes over time according to different factors. Physical changes may occur more slowly and
may be easier to detect than informational or cognitive changes. Commanders and their staffs
must understand both the timeliness of the intelligence they receive and the differing potentials
for change in the dimensions of the information environment. The implication is that we must
have agile intellects, intelligence systems, and organizational processes to exploit this dynamic
environment.
(e) Properties of the Information Environment Affect Intelligence. Collection
of physical and electronic information is objectively measurable by location and quantity. While
111-4
SP 3-13
ya

identification ofkey individuals and groups of interest may be a relatively straightforward challenge, the
relative importance of various individuals and groups, their psychological profiles, and how they interact
is not easily agreed upon nor quantified. Commanders and their staffs must have an appreciation for the
subjective nature of psychological profiles and human nature. They must also continue to pursue effective
means oftrying to measure subjective elements using MOEs and other applicable techniques.
(2) Coordination of Planned 10 with Intelligence. Coordination should occur among
intelligence, targeting, 10, and collection management personnel. The requirement for accurate
intelligence gain/loss and politicaUmilitary assessments, when determining targets to attack and
means of employment, is central to the integration of JO.
(3) Foreign Perceptions and Human Factors Analysis. Assessing foreign
perceptions is necessary for successful IO activities. Preparing the modern battlespace for
successful joint operations relies on a thorough understanding of the information environment,
including foreign perceptions, TA analysis, and cultural analysis. Geographic combatant
commanders require IC support to continually assess foreign perceptions of support for the
areas of responsibility (AORs) TSCP efforts, along with Joint Operation Planning and Execution
System (JOPES) planning activities. Human factors analysis in conjunction with an understanding
of the cultural environment are also important in avoiding projection of US cultural bias on TAs
(mirror imaging). Intelligence resources contribute to assessing of foreign populations through
human factors analysis, influence net modeling, foreign media analysis, media mapping, polling/
focus group analysis, and key communicators/sources of influence analysis. This is, for the
most part, open source intelligence and must be interpreted and synthesized by country/cultural
intelligence subject matter experts (SMEs).
(4) Priority of Effort. The requirement to collect, analyze, and produce detailed
intelligence of the granularity required for I0 currently exceeds the resources of the IC. Assigning
intelligence resources to IO as with all operations is regulated based on established requirements
and processes within the IC. It is imperative that intelligence requirements be coordinated and
prioritized at each level of command.
d. Sources of Intelligence Support
(1) Through the intelligence directorate of a joint staff (J-2), I0 planners and
supporting joint organizations have access to intelligence from the national and combatant
command-level intelligence producers and collectors. At the combatant command level, the
theater joint intelligence center supports IO planning and execution and provides support to
JTFs through established joint intelligence support elements. In multinational operations,
when appropriate, the J-2 should share information and assessments with allies and coalition
partners.
(2) The J-2 on each joint staffnormally assigns specific J-2 personnel to coordinate with IO
planners and capability specialties through the IO cell or other IO stafforganizations established by the
JFC.
ICOMW - 2006 Joint Chiefs of Staff / Information Operations
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/infops.asp
2006 Joint Chiefs of Staff / Information Operations

Log Out
You are currently logged in. Click here to log out.
On February 13, 2006 the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a new edition of their doctrine for
information operations, revising Joint Publication 3-13 dated October 9, 1998. The principal
changes from our point of view are the removal of the term 'information warfare' from joint
information operations doctrine, the discontinuance of the terms 'offensive IO' and 'defensive
IO' to emphasize the fact that information operations should be seen as a seamless activity, and
the addition of a separate chapter on "Intelligence Support to Information Operations".
It would not be an exaggeration to say that we are entering a new era of continuous warfare
against friend and enemy alike, that 'information warfare' has been merged into the 'cognitive
warfare' imagined by Admiral Hogg's Strategic Studies Group, and that the collection of
information to fuel the 'influence technology' developed and demonstrated in the ECCS will be
the full time job of military commanders in the future.
It is no longer to be a question of putting bad information into the enemy's
computer network operations but making certain the enemy acts on it by
controlling the decision makers' minds.
Here is a link to Joint Publication 3-13, with many thanks to Steve Aftergood of the Federation
of American Scientists for posting it on their website:
www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_13.pdf
We direct your attention especially to the definition of 'information operations' on page ix:
"Information operations are described as the integrated employment of ... to influence, disrupt,
corrupt, or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our
own." The words 'influence' and 'disrupt' and 'corrupt' are easy enough to understand. It is the
word 'usurp' to which we call your attention. It means "to take the place of someone in power
illegally or by force". The person in power in this context is your adversary, and you take his
place by studying his cognitive properties beforehand and beaming plans into his brain that
will result in his defeat during periods of conflict. How else can you conduct 'cognitive
warfare'?
ICOMW 2006
31/08/2006 09:53
ICOMW - August 2003 Sandia National Laboratory / Synthetic Humans
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/synthetic.asp
August 2003 Sandia National Laboratory / Synthetic

Humans
Log Out
The United States has to be seen as a place where life frequently imitates art, and the art most
frequently imitated is the motion picture. In 1978 Hollywood gave us a movie titled "Boys from
Brazil" in which a Mengele-like doctor succeeded in cloning replicas of der Fuhrer. The
objective was not necessarily to duplicate their physical resemblance to Adolph Hitler but to
recreate the qualities of leadership which enabled him to inspire the German people before the
disaster which ensued. Of course, the disaster which would ensue again was far off in the future
of the clones and did not come into the calculations of the doctor, played by Gregory Peck. His
ambition was to restore the pride of the remnants of the Nazi Party in exile.
As we have said, in the United States life frequently imitates art and the latest grand challenge
is not to clone our most violent personalities but to replicate the design of their minds in the
processes of a computer, so as to create 'synthetic humans.' Our opinion as to whether that can
or cannot be done is of no consequence as the intention of the U.S. government is quite clear.
However, we were recently asked to describe two or three of the experiments being conducted
on the prisoners in the ECCS and the attempt to create 'synthetic humans' is certainly one of
them.
In 1994, Anita Jones, then Assistant Secretary of Defense for Science and Technology, put out
an invitation to a variety of government contractors and government laboratories to submit
proposals for building a model of the human mind in a computer. This was to be the first step
toward 'synthetic humans,' but the model ran into a problem. The mind is not exactly logical
and consequently there is no mathematics available to describe its operation. It is thought that
to understand human reasoning and the complex information processing system within the
human brain that the mathematics of fuzzy logic (an important new field of mathematics) will
be necessary while chaos theory (another recent field of mathematics) will be necessary to
explain how the brain processes enormous amounts of information virtually instantly.
Mathematics is attempting a synthesis of the two fields and until this is accomplished, work on
the 'synthetic human' is in abeyance.
Actually, we hope that the construction of a computational mind is accomplished quickly
because we have an inkling of the first thought which will occur to it.
Document 1 is an advertisement for a new book on the subject of fuzzy logic and chaos theory.
31/08/2006 09:51
ICOMW - August 2003 Sandia National Laboratory / Synthetic Humans
2 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/synthetic.asp
Document 2 concerns the current state of affairs in the American program to create 'synthetic
humans'. Document 3 describes a more measured and less violent European approach to the
problem of increasing computational intelligence.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
31/08/2006 09:51
ICOMW - July 2003 Secretary of the Air Force / Synthetic Telepathy
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/archives/airforce.asp
July 2003 Secretary of the Air Force / Synthetic Telepathy

Introduction
- Download Main Document (1.04 MB)
In 1973, Joseph C. Sharp, an experimental psychologist at the Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research, set up a landmark experiment on the road to synthetic telepathy (the principal
means by with the Central Intelligence Agency communicates with its prisoners in the ECCS).
He aimed a microwave beam, modulated to resemble acoustic waves, at the back of his own
head and was able to hear his own voice count off the numbers from one through ten. This
experiment was never published but it is described in James C. Lins' book, "Microwave
Auditory Effects and Applications" [Thomas, 1978]. The phenomena discovered by Sharp
became widely known in scientific circles as the microwave hearing effect, but in the subject
patent is referred to as the radio frequency or RF hearing effect.
About a year ago, Allen Barker, a prisoner in the ECCS, called our attention to United States
Patent 6,587,729 "Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency
hearing effect". He had tracked the inventors back to a laboratory at Kirtland Air Force Base
and, indeed, they have assigned the military applications of their invention to the Secretary of
the Air Force.
Apparently, Sharp's original equipment produced only a seriously distorted resemblance to
speech. If the listener did not know the content of the message, the audio signal was
unintelligible. The purpose of this patent is to protect "a novel technique for the intelligible
encoding of signals", particularly speech. The invention also overcomes the problem of the
brain becoming heated from receiving extended messages, which the inventors cautiously
describe as "undesirable".
The significance of this patent is that it is no longer possible to say that a person hearing
voices is suffering from schizophrenia, and that it is no longer possible to say that a person
hearing threatening voices is, ipso facto, suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. And it is no
longer possible for the U.S. Government to contend that it knows nothing at all about the
feasibility of producing "voices in the head", which is the principal complaint of persons
incarcerated in the ECCS.
- Download Main Document (1.04 MB)

ICOMW 2006
11/28/2010 12:45 PM
ICOMW - March 2003 Sony Corporation
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/sony.asp
March 2003 Sony Corporation

Log Out
About ten years ago we were visiting a laboratory in Europe which does a lot of work in the
field of bioelectromagnetism. We asked whether they were aware of any experimental work in
this area where unconsenting human subjects were subjected to altered states of consciousness
via remote electronic means. The scientist we asked replied with the following anecdote.
Some years earlier he had attended a conference in San Diego, CA which offered an optional
tour of a leading electronics laboratory in the area. He elected to take this tour and at one point
the group was asked if any of them would like to play some computer games under
development. A friend of his accepted the laboratory's offer. When his friend returned to the
group some time later he was in a state of disbelief. He thought as the game progressed that his
emotions were being altered to reflect the action displayed on the monitor, but he wasn't really
ready to accept that this was possible. Of course, persons in the ECCS at that time were being
subjected to emotional and psychological and physical alterations on a daily basis as their lives
progressed!
United States Patent 6,536,440 concerns a "Method and system for generating sensory data
onto the human neural cortex". It is a non-invasive system, overcoming the drawbacks of
surgical implants. Essentially, Sony claims that by targeting certain locations of the brain with
ultrasonic energy, pulsed at a low frequency, they can create hallucinations of visual, aural,
olfactory and somatosensory sensations, as well as those of taste.
Certainly, some people enjoy sensory hallucinations or they would not consume the drugs
which produce them. Of course, the United States has declared those drugs to be controlled
substances and trafficking in them results in long prison sentences. Do we want Sony
Corporation building hallucinations into computer games played by children, adolescents and
young adults? Do we want the Central Intelligence Agency and the American military torturing
peaceful citizens by remote electronic means into suicide or violent crimes they would never
otherwise have committed? Why aren't these questions being asked?
ICOMW 2006
31/08/2006 09:49
ICOMW - 2001 U.S. Marine Corps / The Offensive Microwave Weapon
1 of 3
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/usmarine.asp
2001 U.S. Marine Corps / The Offensive Microwave

Weapon
Log Out
On February 23, 2001 Air Force Times published a story which began, "The Marine Corps is
preparing to unveil perhaps the biggest breakthrough in weapons technology since the atomic
bomb - a nonlethal weapon that fires directed energy at human targets". The article went on to
say the new weapon is called the Vehicle-Mounted Active Denial System (VMADS). It was
co-sponsored by the Marine Corps and the Air Force, which had conducted much of the
research and development at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. The Marine Corps' Joint
Nonlethal Weapons Directorate had planned to announce the new weapon in April but when a
sister publication, Marine Corps Times, got a hold of the story, the program was declassified
and the unveiling accelerated.
We remember that on Tuesday, March 2, 2001 we were at the United Nations in New York.
Several persons who had been dubious that offensive microwave weapons even existed, let
alone represented a threat to humanity, approached to tell us with some amazement that there
was a story on microwave weapons in that morning's New York Times. We immediately went
to the newsstand, bought a copy and found the story at the bottom of page A14. (See Document
1, below.) Perhaps, we thought, this is the end of the ECCS.
We had the same thought again on September 11, 2001 as we watched the twin towers of the
World Trade Center collapse on television in a hotel room in Paris. Of course, at that moment
we didn't understand that the attack had been well thought out in advance and bore the
imprint "Made in USA." We actually thought the CIA might be taken off the ECCS and
reassigned to finding Osama, the black sheep of the bin Laden family. But there was only one
beneficiary of the tragedy, a prisoner in the ECCS who lived directly across the street from the
World Trade Center at that time. The persons torturing him and all of their records on him
were lost in the collapse of the towers and he has lived a free man ever since.
Then again, on March 19, 2003 when Gulf War II began, we thought of all the military
intelligence reserve units being recalled to active duty and wondered whether this was the end
of the ECCS; and after "Sixty Minutes" televised photos in April 2004 of American soldiers
degrading prisoners and themselves at Abu Ghraib (graphically demonstrating that the United
States Government does indeed practice torture) we thought this too might be the end of the
ECCS. But it was only the end of two prisoners, both of whom who could have born witness
against senior civilian appointees in the Department of Defense and were murdered on
31/08/2006 09:47
2 of 3
account of it.
At any rate, it is now 2006 and the pool of human beings regarded as expendable by the United
States Government (which we refer to as the ECCS) has grown even larger due to the insatiable
demands of senior administration officials for ever spicier reports and videotapes of torture
and murder.
The March 1, 2001 press conference on the first offensive microwave weapon to be disclosed
(which resulted in the March 2 report in the New York Times) also resulted in a lengthy report
in Defense News of March 12, 2001 (page 30). This report dwells on the possible adverse
consequences of the new weapon and the extensive human testing which accompanied its
development. The Joint Non-lethal Weapons Directorate was finally forced to admit that the
Vehicle Mounted Active Denial System (VMADS) was designed for two or three second bursts.
"If misused, it could be harmful".
Document 2 is an article from Inside The Navy (a private enterprise publication available by
subscription only from www.insidedefense.com) of March 26, 2001. The article is titled
"Questions Linger about Health Effects of DOD's 'Non-Lethal' Ray". What the title doesn't say
is that the bright reporter who wrote the article asks some penetrating questions about the
possibility of VMADS having mind control applications. The answers he gets are evasive but
the fact that the questions were asked at all is important. The electronics in the VMADS are in
fact the heart of the system used by the Government to torture and murder expendable citizens
in the privacy of their own homes.
Document 3 is the Air Force Research Laboratory's official bibliography on the biological
effects of millimeter wave radiation, which includes the 94GHz frequency at which VMADS
operates. As far as we know, this bibliography has been published nowhere else. We obtained
this copy from the Armstrong Laboratory at Brooks Air Force Base, Texas.
Two things about this bibliography are particularly interesting. Firstly, the dates of publication
of the earliest published papers on the biological effects (1982) and possible health hazards
(1981) of millimeter-wave radiation. These dates indicate that the electronics in the VMADS
has already been developed several years earlier, when those studies commenced.
Consequently, we know the technology used to torture persons in the privacy of their own
homes has been available at least since 1980, if not earlier.
Second is a point which will doubtlessly only be of interest to the members of BEMS
(Bioelectromagnetic's Society) and others engaged in basic and applied research into the
biological and health effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) at power-line and cell phone
frequencies. Their work has been stymied for years by a false assertion of Yale University
physics professor Robert Adair. He says that inasmuch as the human body is a very good
insulator, external EMR cannot produce EMF (electromagnetic fields) internally which rise
above the noise of the human body's own EM operations and, consequently, external EMR can
have no biological and/or health affects. This little invention of Professor Adair is proven false
every day in radio astronomy, for instance, where it is an observable fact that it is not the
strength of the signal which is important but the sensitivity of the receiver. And there are no
more sensitive receivers than the molecular transactions taking place in the human body.
You will also note that two names occur repeatedly among the scientists who signed off on the
Air Force's research into the biological and health effects of millimeter waves - E.R. Adair and
K.R. Foster. Eleanor Adair, a physiological psychologist, spent her career doing research at
New Haven's John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University's cover for classified government
contracts. Eleanor Adair is the wife of Robert Adair, the "inventor" mentioned above. Kenneth
Foster worked at a U.S. Navy laboratory before he came to the University of Pennsylvania
where he has been the disciple of Herman Paul Schwan, a Nazi biophysicist brought to the
United States by Project Paperclip. He was placed in a U.S. Navy aviation medicine laboratory
in Philadelphia, as a technician. But that was before Schwan metastasized into "The Father of
Biomedical Engineering ... in the United States of America". The long pause, of course, is
because biomedical engineering was pioneered in the concentration camps of Nazi Germany.
These three, Adair and Adair and Foster, have stepped forward at every opportunity to attack
ground-breaking advances in understanding the health effects of EMR, such as the studies
31/08/2006 09:47
3 of 3
finding a statistically significant association between power-line magnetic fields and childhood
leukemia. The interesting thing about their activities is how quickly their colleagues catch onto
the idea that their own government research grants will be impaired if they rise to the defense
of science rather than the needs of the military - industrial - intelligence complex. The bottom
line: this bibliography is largely irrelevant because the essential experiments on the biological
and health effects of millimeter waves have been done over the dead bodies of persons in the
ECCS, and cannot be published.
Lastly, the only honest forum on the non-thermal effects of EMR is run by Klaus Rudolph from
Germany, on the Internet. On February 19, 2003 Mr. Rudolph published a very interesting
communication from a scientist (whose name was suppressed) regarding non-thermal effects,
including at the end a very important statement concerning VMADS. I submit it to you as
Document 4, not because I object to volunteer armies slaughtering each other with whatever
weapons they choose, but because prisoners in the ECCS are being bathed in the same
millimeter wave radiation 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
31/08/2006 09:47
ICOMW - 1997 Senator John Glenn / Human Research Subject Protectio...
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/glenn.asp
1997 Senator John Glenn / Human Research Subject

Protections Act of 1997
Log Out
John Glenn was one of the most widely admired men in the United States Senate. He saw
combat with the U.S. Marine Corps in World War II and the Korean War, and rose to rank of
Colonel before retiring in 1965. In 1962 he became the first American to orbit the Earth in a
space craft. He was a member of numerous U.S. and international aviation, aeronautic and
scientific organizations. He was elected to the U.S. Senate on November 5, 1974 by the people
of Ohio - his home state - and served as Senator until his retirement from public life on
January 3, 1999. On his retirement he was the ranking minority member of the Senate
Governmental Affairs Committee and a member of its Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations, a member of the Armed Services Committee's Subcommittee on Strategic
Forces (which has oversight of the Pentagon's military intelligence activities) and the senior
Democrat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. In other words, there was no one
more knowledgeable on the subject of classified medical and scientific research on
unconsenting human subjects in the entire American Congress than Senator John Glenn of
Ohio.
At the beginning of the 105th Congress, Senator Glenn introduced a bill "to provide protections
to individuals who are the human subject of research". It was assigned the identifier S.193, by
which we will henceforth refer to this bill. S.193 was specifically designed to deal with all
human research including even that which is classified, and requires that the human subject of
classified research be given the identity of the Federal Agency providing the funding, a
statement that the research contains classified information, and an unclassified description of
the purpose of the research. With that, Senator Glenn left for Houston, Texas to resume his
career as an astronaut at age 76 while continuing to collect his salary as a Senator.
What we know for certain is this: Glenn abandoned the Senate and his legislation a few months
after introducing it, that the bill was never reported out of the subcommittee to which it was
referred, that the bill was opposed by the pharmaceutical industry, and that without Glenn's
muscle behind it we lost our best chance ever to stop Nazi-style human experiments in the
United States of America and by its proxies around the world.
Never tiring, we called Senator Glenn's office at Ohio State University after his return from
space to inquire whether he would see us to discuss a strategy for having his bill reintroduced
in the Congress. After consulting with the decrepit astronaut himself, his executive assistant
30/08/2006 17:03
ICOMW - 1997 Senator John Glenn / Human Research Subject Protectio...
2 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/glenn.asp
told us to get lost.

We are presenting here S.193 itself.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 17:03
ICOMW - 1996 U.S. Navy / Cognitive Warfare
1 of 1
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/cogwarfare.asp
1996 U.S. Navy / Cognitive Warfare

Log Out
Over the years, the International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons has joined
more organizations and subscribed to more publications than we care to remember, all in an
effort to come up with factual information concerning offensive microwave weapons and how
they can produce the variety of biological effects we know of through the anecdotal accounts of
prisoners in the ECCS. At the same time, people who seemed to be Washington-insiders would
tell us that, "Washington is like a sieve. If anything like that was happening, it would be all over
the front page (of the Washington Post, et al) in no time at all." But until March 2001 offensive
microwave weapons remained a mystery, and the unconsented human experiments with them
are yet to be revealed officially.
Defense News is a privately published, weekly newspaper read by the politicians and the
military establishments of many countries around the world. This particular article attracted
our attention because of the then recent murder of Admiral Boorda and also because of the
term 'cognitive warfare,' which we hadn't seen before. Because the term 'information warfare'
was then coming into vogue, it was obvious that this was something more than disturbing the
enemy's lines of communication or even managing to replace accurate information with false
messages. Since cognition is a property of the human mind and not of naval vessels, what is
implied by the term 'cognitive warfare' is attacking your human adversary's mental processes,
or ability to analyze and integrate and act on such information as the adversary is receiving.
Also, note that Admiral Hogg is acknowledging that this concept will call for testing and
demonstrations, which appear to be in part what the ECCS is all about.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 17:02
ICOMW - 1989 President George Herbert Walker Bush / Public Law 101-58
1 of 1
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/publiclaw.asp
1989 President George Herbert Walker Bush / Public Law

101-58
Log Out
After George Herbert Walker Bush was replaced as director of Central Intelligence by
Stansfield Turner in 1977, a person by the name of Morgan Downey began to lobby Congress
for a grand initiative to unlock the secrets of the human brain. He found an ally in Silvio Cont,
a member of the House of Representatives from Massachusetts, but Downey's efforts were
unsuccessful until Bush became President in 1989. Then a joint resolution of the Senate and
the House of Representatives named the decade beginning January 1, 1990 the "Decade of the
Brain" and authorized and requested the former Director of Central Intelligence "to issue a
proclamation calling upon all public officials and the people of the United States to observe
such decade with appropriate programs and activities". Thus it was that the death squad
operations, formerly run out of the White House through FEMA, acquired a certain legitimacy
and some permanence.
Please note that the original purpose of Public Law 101-58 of July 15, 1989 was to raise public
awareness of "disorders and disabilities that affect the brain" and make the prevention and
treatment of such disorders and disabilities a health priority. All of the mental health activity
which ensued lent a certain legitimacy to the ongoing interest of the Central Intelligence
Agency in creating an agent with no provable connection to any American intelligence
organization, the so-called Manchurian Candidate. It also lent legitimacy to their ambition to
disable and/or destroy their enemies by remote electronic means and, ultimately, to the
creation of the Electronic Camp System (ECCS) which exists today.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 17:01
ICOMW - 1989 President George Herbert Walker Bush / Public Law 101-58
1 of 1
http://www.icomw.org/archives/publiclaw.asp
1989 President George Herbert Walker Bush / Public Law

101-58
Introduction
- Download Main Document (146 KB)
After George Herbert Walker Bush was replaced as director of Central Intelligence by
Stansfield Turner in 1977, a person by the name of Morgan Downey began to lobby Congress
for a grand initiative to unlock the secrets of the human brain. He found an ally in Silvio
Cont, a member of the House of Representatives from Massachusetts, but Downey's efforts
were unsuccessful until Bush became President in 1989. Then a joint resolution of the Senate
and the House of Representatives named the decade beginning January 1, 1990 the "Decade of
the Brain" and authorized and requested the former Director of Central Intelligence "to issue
a proclamation calling upon all public officials and the people of the United States to observe
such decade with appropriate programs and activities". Thus it was that the death squad
operations, formerly run out of the White House through FEMA, acquired a certain legitimacy
and some permanence.
Please note that the original purpose of Public Law 101-58 of July 15, 1989 was to raise public
awareness of "disorders and disabilities that affect the brain" and make the prevention and
treatment of such disorders and disabilities a health priority. All of the mental health activity
which ensued lent a certain legitimacy to the ongoing interest of the Central Intelligence
Agency in creating an agent with no provable connection to any American intelligence
organization, the so-called Manchurian Candidate. It also lent legitimacy to their ambition to
disable and/or destroy their enemies by remote electronic means and, ultimately, to the
creation of the Electronic Camp System (ECCS) which exists today.

ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
11/28/2010 12:37 PM
ICOMW - 1986 Central Intelligence Agency / Domestic Operations
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/archives/cia.asp
1986 Central Intelligence Agency / Domestic Operations

Introduction
- Download Main Document (51.8 KB)
During the summer of 1986, officials of eighteen metropolitan police departments were
invited to the CIA's headquarters in Virginia and asked to provide experienced undercover
investigators for three year tours of duty. The following document from the New York Times
of November 2, 1986 proclaims that the officers were being recruited "to help fight terrorism
abroad". This has always seemed to us to be unlikely, more an excuse than an explanation,
and to substantiate the fear of extra-legal domestic surveillance operations which brought
Admiral Inman to resign from his post as Deputy Director of Central Intelligence. Perhaps
Admiral Inman's resignation caused William Casey and his sidekick, George Herbert Walker
Bush, to reconsider whatever plan they had to subjugate the American people and to decide
instead to employ local policemen to act for them.
The program reported in the New York Times has always been a matter of curiosity to us
because of the existence of the ECCS. This program would have delivered to the CIA spies
within the police departments of eighteen major cities to alert them in the event that the
police were about to move in on one of their classified human research operations. Also, these
operations consume tremendous quantities of background information on each subject which
is used to insult, ridicule and humiliate the subject. What better way to collect this
information than by dispatching police officers seconded to the CIA for a three-year tour of
duty to the homes of neighbors, classmates, employers, lovers and even the family of the
subject?
Suffice it to say that since 9/11 information on the domestic activities of the CIA has become
quite impossible to obtain. We have tried.
Many thanks to a prisoner in the ECCS for sending us this article.
- Download Main Document (51.8 KB)

ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
11/28/2010 12:34 PM
ICOMW - 1985 Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe
1 of 1
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/ciasims.asp
1985 Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe

Log Out
The Supreme Court decision in Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe sealed the fate
of Americans to be divided into two classes of citizens: those protected by the rights allegedly
accorded to all citizens under the 5th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, and
those whose liberties and even lives can be snatched from them at any moment by an edict of
the Central Intelligence Agency to the effect that it needs those liberties and lives "to fulfill its
statutory obligations with respect to foreign intelligence". This decision set the stage for the
atrocities being committed in the Electronic Concentration Camp System (ECCS) even at this
very moment. Please note, however, that some unconsented human experiments leading to the
ECCS preceded this decision by many years.
Our take on the Central Intelligence Agency is that it has conducted unconsented human
experiments on American "citizens" continuously since at least 1950 and that the only way to
stop this ingrained practice is to dismember the CIA, as proposed by Senator Daniel Patrick
Moynihan after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The attached document was furnished to us by Cheryl Welsh of Mind Justice, Inc. a non-profit
organization dedicated to educating the public about unconsented human experiments,
investigating allegations of abuse, and researching ways and means of protecting the public
from new technologies and weapons which impact the mind and nervous system.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:59
ICOMW - 1985 Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe
1 of 1
http://www.icomw.org/archives/ciasims.asp
1985 Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe

Introduction
The Supreme Court decision in Central Intelligence Agency vs. Sims and Wolfe sealed the fate
of Americans to be divided into two classes of citizens: those protected by the rights allegedly
accorded to all citizens under the 5th, 8th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution, and
those whose liberties and even lives can be snatched from them at any moment by an edict of
the Central Intelligence Agency to the effect that it needs those liberties and lives "to fulfill its
statutory obligations with respect to foreign intelligence". This decision set the stage for the
atrocities being committed in the Electronic Concentration Camp System (ECCS) even at this
very moment. Please note, however, that some unconsented human experiments leading to
the ECCS preceded this decision by many years.
Our take on the Central Intelligence Agency is that it has conducted unconsented human
experiments on American "citizens" continuously since at least 1950 and that the only way to
stop this ingrained practice is to dismember the CIA, as proposed by Senator Daniel Patrick
Moynihan after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The attached document was furnished to us by Cheryl Welsh of Mind Justice, Inc. a
non-profit organization dedicated to educating the public about unconsented human
experiments, investigating allegations of abuse, and researching ways and means of protecting
the public from new technologies and weapons which impact the mind and nervous system.

ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
11/28/2010 12:33 PM
ICOMW - 1984 U.S. Navy / Captain Paul E. Tyler
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/archives/tyler.asp
1984 U.S. Navy / Captain Paul E. Tyler

Introduction
The attached paper, "The Electromagnetic Spectrum in LIC" by Capt. Paul E. Tyler, United
States Navy, is perhaps unique in the declassified military literature. Here is a medical doctor
and scientist (assigned at that time to the Naval Medical Research and Development
Command) lecturing a military audience on the potential military applications of
electromagnetic radiation (EMR), and as he says, "many studies ... published in the last few
years indicate that specific biological effects can be achieved by controlling the various
parameters of the electromagnetic (EM) field." In fact, we regard this paper as so important in
the chain of evidence establishing the existence of an Electronic Concentration Camp System
that if our Archive consisted of only two documents, the Tyler paper would surely be one of
them!
Early on I presented this paper to a skeptic for his reaction. He remarked to me after reading
it (and having doubtlessly been surprised that it had been published in the open literature at
all) that it stops one inch short of calling for unconsented human experiments. My reply to
him today would be that there was no reason to call for un-consented human experiments in
1984 because such experiments had been proceeding quietly since at least 1976, a fact of
which Capt. Tyler would certainly have been aware.
It was the possession of this paper which led to our placing those advertisements in 1990
which we have mentioned before, and all that has ensued. Our eternal gratitude to Lou Wolf,
then editor of Covert Action Bulletin, who supported us early on and suggested we take our
search for documentation to the National Security Archive (then located in a nearby building
occupied by the Brookings Institution), and to Eddie Becker, then employed by the National
Security Archive, who remembered having seen the Tyler paper in a book recently acquired by
his employer - and hunted it down for us.

ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
11/28/2010 12:31 PM
ICOMW - 1982 Central Intelligence Agency /Admiral Bobby Inman
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/seib.asp
1982 Central Intelligence Agency /Admiral Bobby Inman

Log Out
was prompted by a dispute over plans for domestic intelligence activities". The report goes on
to say that Admiral Inman objected to a new directive the White House had approved on
was miffed because the White House didn't allow him a greater voice in shaping the
intelligence procedures".
President George Herbert Walker Bush, who apparently thought it part of his portfolio to
stage-manage the CIA from his office in the White House because he was a former director of
the Central Intelligence Agency. However, at the time we found this article (some years after it
was published) we were only interested in whether the new procedures Inman objected to
included the use of synthetic telepathy to entrap persons suspected of spying, and possibly
even the use of synthetic telepathy and other electronic affects to torture peaceful citizens into
suicide or crimes of violence in order to prove that the Central Intelligence Agency controlled
their minds.
earlier), but as we proceeded to the matter-at-hand he became vague as to what, if anything, he
could add to the story he had written. We decided to call Admiral Inman himself.
We found Admiral Inman at his new job with a public-private initiative to make the United
States pre-eminent in the manufacture of semi-conductors, and managed to get through to the
and he responded that he had, indeed, discussed our conversation with Admiral Inman. Then
he gave us the Admiral's response in a manner which was so precise that we imagined he was
reading it word-for-word from a slip of paper on which he had written it down: "Admiral
Inman is not prepared to discuss that matter - at this time".
30/08/2006 16:57
2 of 2
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:57
1 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/archives/seib.asp
1982 Central Intelligence Agency /A

Introduction
the Central Intelligence Agency. However, at the time we found this article (some years after
it was published) we were only interested in whether the new procedures Inman objected to
even the use of synthetic telepathy and other electronic affects to torture peaceful citizens
into suicide or crimes of violence in order to prove that the Central Intelligence Agency
controlled their minds.
earlier), but as we proceeded to the matter-at-hand he became vague as to what, if anything,
he could add to the story he had written. We decided to call Admiral Inman himself.
States pre-eminent in the manufacture of semi-conductors, and managed to get through to
the aide-de-camp he had brought with him from the Navy. That man certainly could listen. He
11/28/2010 12:29 PM
2 of 2
http://www.icomw.org/archives/seib.asp
misfortune of being stationed in the Soviet Embassy in Washington at the time George
Herbert Walker Bush was DCI, and apparently had incurred his enmity.

ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
11/28/2010 12:29 PM
ICOMW - 1980 U.S. Army / Colonel John Alexander
1 of 1
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/alexander.asp
1980 U.S. Army / Colonel John Alexander

Log Out
We are hesitantly including "The New Mental Battlefield: 'Beam Me Up, Spock'" in our
evidentiary time-line because it is frequently referred to but has hardly ever been read and
because its flamboyant author, years later, emerged as a leading advocate of non-lethal
weaponry. Also, the paranormal research this article advocates did serve as a cover for a
certain amount of the research which enabled the ECCS to be built.
Another way of looking at the big picture is that the very real and scientific advances into
electromagnetically controlling the human mind which had occurred by 1980 began to
feedback into greater demands for research into the pseudo-scientific, including the
paranormal. For the scientifically illiterate, success in the area of mind control suggested that
all manner of science fiction was now within reach. Colonel Alexander's last military
assignment was as Director, Advanced Systems Concepts Office, U.S. Army Laboratory
Command.
Persons wishing more information regarding the colorful colonel and his mentor/disciple,
Major General Albert Stubblebine, may wish to read the recently published book by Jon
Ronson titled, "The Men Who Stare at Goats".
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:57
ICOMW, 2006
ICOMW - 1979 United Nations / Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/ungromyko.asp
1979 United Nations / Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei

Gromyko
Log Out
We are attempting to write the story of the development of the Electronic Concentration Camp
System (ECCS) from open sources and anecdotal evidence. We believe that when the
associated, classified government documents become available it will be necessary to rewrite
the history of the last 30 years. The United States has cast itself on the world stage during this
period as the exemplar of all virtues in the conduct of its wars and other foreign affairs, and the
champion of human rights around the world. Here is a piece of that new history from the
archives of the United Nations.
The International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons has been a member of the
Coalition for an International Criminal Court (CICC) since 1996. The CICC is an assembly of
thousands of non-governmental organizations from around the world. In the spring of 1998,
we were working together for the single purpose of assisting the national delegations in writing
what is now called the Statute of Rome. We were also growing increasingly concerned that the
insatiable demands of the American Department of State might be impossible to resolve at the
approaching treaty conference or might render the nascent Court weak and inefficient.
It is against this backdrop that Cheryl Welsh of Mind Justice, Inc., who had focused in on
Russian developments in mind control weapons, asked us to do some research for her in the
archives of the United Nations. The documents she asked us to locate were so astonishing to us
that we sat down and wrote the paper which follows. It is important to remember in reading
this paper that it was written in 1998 about events that took place 20 years earlier. And, it was
over those 20 years that the United States developed, tested, and evaluated a system and
method of imprisoning human beings in their own bodies and torturing them endlessly until
they die, simply because there are no visible sequelae to their instruments of torture.
Ironically, the Plenipotentiary Treaty Conference held in Rome, Italy from June 15 to July 17,
1998 was able to resolve its differences in favor of a strong and efficient Court. The delegates
finished editing the Statute of Rome and approved it by an overwhelming vote against the
United States because of the bombast and torrent of threats that the United States had issued
over the preceding years.
President Clinton signed the Treaty for the United States on the very last day of 2000, an act
subsequently denounced by letter to the Secretary General by President George W. Bush. We
30/08/2006 16:53
ICOMW - 1979 United Nations / Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko
2 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/ungromyko.asp
can't help but wonder whether President Bush's denunciation was aimed at preventing the
prosecution of senior Administration officials (and many others) for crimes against humanity
committed in the ECCS.
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:53
ICOMW - 1968 Patrick Flanagan
1 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/flanagan.asp
1968 Patrick Flanagan

Log Out
On July 16, 1968, the United States Patent Office issued Patent 3,393,279 for an invention
described as a "nervous system excitation device". This invention involved the discovery, "...
that certain electromagnetic waves induce responses in the nervous system of mammals. In
human beings a response is produced when some or all of a person's nervous system is placed
within a field of electromagnetic waves ... ." This invention was the progenitor of the
equipment which has been used for many years in the protracted extra-judicial killing of
American citizens (and the citizens of our allies) in their own homes by the Central Intelligence
Agency.
Interestingly enough, the Patent Office held this invention in abeyance for six years because
they did not believe that Flanagan had discovered anything. He finally had to go to Washington
and demonstrate it to the astonished examiners in order to obtain the patent granted. Despite
this patent, and because they are afraid of losing their lucrative government grants, most
American scientists working in the field of bioelectromagnetism still deny, deny, deny that
electromagnetic radiation has any affect other than heating on the human nervous system.
This lie was perpetuated in the U.S. Marine Corps announcement in 2001 of an "active denial
technology" which produces the pain of being burned but no visible damage to the skin.
Please take special note that in the Flanagan patent, two of the three claims made for the
device mention coupling effects with the nervous system in the skin of the human subject, and
the remaining claim asserts coupling with "a portion of the nervous system contained in the
person's spinal column".
N.B. The device Flanagan currently markets as the Neurophone may or may not be similar to
the equipment the CIA and DOD refer to as "influence technology". The Neurophone employs
acoustic waves as a pathway into the nervous system rather than electromagnetic waves. In
other words, the end result may be the same but the mechanism by which the body converts
the disturbance into the appearance of sound is entirely different than the way his nervous
system excitation device works.
ICOMW 2006
30/08/2006 16:50
ICOMW - 1968 Patrick Flanagan
2 of 2
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/flanagan.asp
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:50
ICOMW - 1960 Central Intelligence Agency / MKULTRA
1 of 1
http://icomw.atlantis/archives/mkultra.asp
1960 Central Intelligence Agency / MKULTRA

Log Out
In July 1959, a professor of Social Psychology at Texas Christian University wrote the Human
Ecology Fund (a CIA front organization) regarding the possibility of a modest grant (by today's
standards) to study environmental affects on human behavior. He said he was planning to
make this his main research interest for the next several years. But after a visit from someone
at the Agency, he wrote that he was prepared to immediately begin "a critical review of
literature and scientific developments related to the recording, analysis and interpretation of
bioelectric signals from the human organism and activation of human behavior by remote
means". His proposal, as modified, became MKULTRA, Subproject 119. He also sent the
Agency a proposal he had made elsewhere to build a powerful EEG machine with an inbuilt
capacity for the "diagnostic and scientific interpretation of the recorded brain waves", but there
is nothing in the file to indicate what became of this proposal.
Because the CIA has recently offered for sale a CD set containing 18,000 pages of mind control
documents they have already declassified, we are displaying here only one, three-page
document. It was not taken off the CIA disks but is from the collection of documents author
John Marks donated to the National Security Archive, a non-profit organization associated
with George Washington University, Washington, D.C. His book, "The Search for 'The
Manchurian Candidate:' The CIA and Mind Control", Times Books, NY, 1979, remains the
classic work on the CIA's notorious MKULTRA program.
Note particularly John Marks' handwritten note in the left margin of page 3: "ability to
program a killer".
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:46
1 of 2
1982 Central Intelligence Agency /Admiral Bobby Inman

Log Out
the Central Intelligence Agency. However, at the time we found this article (some years after it
was published) we were only interested in whether the new procedures Inman objected to
even the use of synthetic telepathy and other electronic affects to torture peaceful citizens into
suicide or crimes of violence in order to prove that the Central Intelligence Agency controlled
their minds.
earlier), but as we proceeded to the matter-at-hand he became vague as to what, if anything, he
could add to the story he had written. We decided to call Admiral Inman himself.
States pre-eminent in the manufacture of semi-conductors, and managed to get through to the
30/08/2006 16:57
2 of 2
ICOMW 2006
Archive Index
Return to Home Page
30/08/2006 16:57
Cheney's `Spoon-Benders'
Pushing Nuclear Armageddon
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbenders.html
by Jeffrey Steinberg
Sometime in late 1980, then-Col. Paul E. Vallely, the Commander of the 7th Psychological
Operations Group, United States Army Reserve, Presidio of San Francisco, Ca., co-authored a
discussion paper, which received wide and controversial attention within the U.S. military,
particularly within the Special Operations community. The paper was titled "From PSYOP to
MindWar: The Psychology of Victory," and it presented a Nietzschean scheme for waging
perpetual psychological warfare against friend and enemy populations alike, and even against the
American people.
The "MindWar" paper was provoked by an article by Lt. Col. John Alexander, which appeared in
the December 1980 edition of Military Review, advocating the introduction of ESP (extra-sensory
perception), "tele-pathetic behavior modification," para-psychology, psychokinesis ("mind over
matter"), remote viewing, out of body experiences, and other New Age and occult practices into
U.S. military intelligence. Alexander's paper was titled "The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up,
Spock."
But the subsequent paper co-authored by Vallely went way beyond ESP and the other
paranormal techniques advocated by Alexander: "Strategic MindWar must begin the moment war
is considered to be inevitable," the document stated. "It must seek out the attention of the enemy
nation through every available medium, and it must strike at the nation's potential soldiers before
they put on their uniforms. It is in their homes and their communities that they are most vulnerable
to MindWar....
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued, "MindWar must be strategic in emphasis, with
tactical applications playing a reinforcing, supplementary role. In its strategic context, MindWar
must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike across the globeneither through primitive
'battlefield' leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through the weak, imprecise, and narrow
effort of psychotronicsbut through the media possessed by the United States which have the
capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth. These media are, of course the
electronic mediatelevision and radio. State of the art developments in satellite communication,
video recording techniques, and laser and optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a
penetration of the minds of the world such as would have been inconceivable just a few years
ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King Arthur's magical sworded.], we have but to reach out and
seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have the courage and the integrity to
enhance civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire
foreign cultures with our morality. If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have
no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level.
"MindWar must target all participants to be effective. It must not only weaken the enemy; it must
strengthen the United States. It strengthens the United States by denying enemy propaganda
access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our
national interest in a specific war."
Leaving nothing to the imagination, the document concluded by emphasizing that MindWar
should employ subliminal brainwashing technologies, and weapons that directly attack the
targetted population's central nervous system and brain functioning: "There are some purely
natural conditions under which minds may become more or less receptive to ideas, and MindWar
should take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic activity, air
ionization, and extremely low frequency waves," the paper concluded.
The "MindWar" paper was disturbing, for reasons beyond its fascistic and occultist content. For
one thing, Colonel Vallely's co-author was a PSYOP Research & Analysis Team Leader named
Maj. Michael A. Aquino. Five years before the circulation of the MindWar paper, Special Forces
Reserve officer Aquino had founded the Temple of Set, a Satanic organization which was the
successor to Anton Szandor LeVay's Church of Satan. Aquino would soon be grabbing
headlines, which persisted throughout the 1980s, as a leading suspect in a nationwide Satanic
pedophile ring, that particularly targetted daycare centers on such military bases as Fort Bragg
and the Presidio (see article, p. 21).
Furthermore, Vallely and Aquino's MindWar scheme is remarkably similar to the Total Information
Awareness (TIA) program launched by the Donald Rumsfeld Pentagon, under the direction of
Irangate figure Adm. John Poindexter. Ostensibly, the Total Information Awareness global
propaganda and mega-data-mining plan was scrapped after a series of negative news stories,
but Pentagon sources have reported that the program was merely "taken into a black box."
Indeed, on Aug. 16, 2005, The New York Times' Philip Shenon revealed that a super-secret
Pentagon "special action program" called Able Danger had tracked Mohammed Atta and three of
the other Sept. 11, 2001 hijackers a year prior to the attacks; but Pentagon lawyers with the
Special Operations Command refused to allow the information to be shared with the FBI, for fear
of exposing the data-mining program to any public scrutiny. The Times learned of Able Danger
from Lt. Col. Anthony Schaffer, who was the program's liaison to the Defense Intelligence Agency
at the time.
'Nuke Iran!'
Colonel Vallely's association with Aquino did little to stall the former's military career
advancement. A West Point graduate, Vallely retired in 1991 as deputy commanding general of
the U.S. Army of the Pacific. From 1982-86, he headed the 351st Civil Affairs Command, placing
him in charge of all Special Forces, Psychological Warfare, and Civil Affairs Military units in the
Western United States and Hawaii.
Today, he is practicing what he and Satanist Aquino preached in the MindWar paper, and is one
of the leading propaganda assets in Vice President Dick Cheney's push for military confrontation
with Iranone that could see the United States carry out the first pre-emptive nuclear attack in
history.
General Vallely, now retired from the military, is a senior military commentator for Rupert
Murdoch's shrill Fox TV News; is a "client" of Benador Associates, the premier public relations
firm for the neo-conservative cabal in Washington; is the Military Committee chairman for Frank
Gaffney's neo-conned Center for Strategic Policy; and is the co-founder, along with Gen. Thomas
McInerney (USAF-ret.), another Benador client, of the Iran Policy Committee. IPC is yet another
neo-con front group that: 1) promotes the Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), a group on the State
Department's list of International Terrorist Organizations (for assassinating a number of U.S.
military officers in Iran); and 2) demands U.S. military action to impose "regime change" 1n
Tehran, through such measures as a massive bombing campaign against Iran's purported secret
nuclear weapons labs, and a U.S. Naval blockade of the Straits of Hormuz. Recently General
Vallely co-authored a book with General McInerney, titled EndgameBlueprint for Victory for
Winning the War on Terror, which borrows, philosophically, from his and Aquino's original
MindWar rant (see interview with Vallely on p. 13).
The 'Jedi Warriors'
General Vallely, Colonel Alexander, and Lt. Colonel Aquino (ret.) are but three leading figures
within the Special Operations community, who have promoted the application of New Age and
outright Satanic practices to the art of war, conducting experimental programs aimed at creating a
Nietzschean "bermensch warrior."
In preparation for this article, EIR has interviewed a number of senior retired military and
intelligence officers, who have identified, from their own personal experiences, a number of other
leading military officers who promoted these efforts and funnelled massive amounts of Pentagon
money into "black programs," testing the military applications of a whole range of bizarre "nonlethal" techniques and technologies. Some of the top-secret programs funded by taxpayer dollars
over the past 25 years betray a significant degree of outright "spoon-bending" lunacy. Others lead
directly to the doorsteps of Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib military detention centers, where
prisoners have been turned into human guinea pigs for experimental torture techniques, drawn
from the same New Age bag of tricks.
And The New Yorker magazine investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, in a Jan. 24-31, 2005
article on "The Coming Wars," mooted that the Special Forces "black programs" may now have
ventured into the field of "pseudo-gang warfare," in which counterinsurgency methods blur with
insurgency.
Quoting from a September 2003 San Francisco Chronicle article by Naval Postgraduate School
defense analyst and Pentagon counterinsurgency advisor John Arquilla, Hersh hinted that U.S.
Special Forces units were being unleashed to create their own terrorist "pseudo gangs" to more
easily infiltrate terrorist groups like al-Qaeda. Arquilla wrote: "When conventional military
operations and bombing failed to defeat the Mau Mau insurgency in Kenya in the 1950s, the
British formed teams of friendly Kikuyu tribesmen who went about pretending to be terrorists.
These 'pseudo gangs,' as they were called, swiftly threw the Mau Mau on the defensive, either by
befriending and then ambushing bands of fighters or by guiding bombers to the terrorists' camps.
What worked in Kenya a half-century ago has a wonderful chance of undermining trust and
recruitment among today's terror networks. Forming new pseudo gangs should not be difficult."
Arquilla added, for good measure: "If a confused young man from Marin County can join up with
al-Qaeda [a reference to John Walker Lindh, the so-called American Talibanied.], think what
professional operatives might do."
The 'Gang of Four'
Four of the names most often cited as promoters of programs like the "Goat Lab," the "Jedi
Warriors," "Grill Flame," "Task Force Delta," and the "First Earth Battalion," have held top posts
within the military intelligence and Special Operations commands:
Gen. Albert Stubblebine III was the head of U.S. Army Intelligence, INSCOM (Intelligence and
Security Command), from 1981-84, during which time he launched a series of secret projects at
Fort Meade, Md., involving remote viewing and other occult practices. General Stubblebine was,
perhaps, the U.S. Army's most senior and loudest advocate of the full gamut of New Age warfare.
Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the current U.S. Army Chief of Staff, was Commanding General of the
Joint Special Operations Command (1994-96), Commander of the United States Army Special
Operations Command (1996-97), and Commander in Chief of the United States Special
Operations Command (1997-2000). According to a well-researched book exposing the New Age
penetration of the U.S. military, The Men Who Stare at Goats, by Jon Ronson (Simon & Schuster,
New York, 2004), General Schoomaker has created a think-tank, under the sponsorship of the
SOC office, to expand the application of these bizarre occult and para-normal operations
throughout the U.S. Army, as his contribution to President George W. Bush's Global War on
Terrorism (GWOT).
Gen. Wayne Downing also was the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Special Operations
Command, and earlier directed all special operations during the December 1989 invasion of
Panama, when some of the MindWar techniques were used, during the siege of the Vatican
compound where Gen. Manuel Noriega had taken refuge. Following the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, Downing was named National Director and Deputy National Security Advisor for
Combatting Terrorism in the Bush-Cheney White House, a post he held until June 2002.
According to military sources, General Downing left the White House as the result of a conflict
with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, over plans for the invasion of Iraq. Downing had argued that
Saddam Hussein could be overthrown by a massive "shock and awe" bombing campaign,
followed by an invasion by a force of no more than 25,000 Special Forces troops. The "Downing
Plan" was rejected by the Chiefs as "sheer madness," according to one senior military source
familiar with the events.
Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin was the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Special Operations
Command (Airborne) at Fort Bragg, N.C., from 1998-2000. Prior to that, he was the Commander
of the elite counter-terror unit, Delta Force, from 1992-95. He was, in that capacity, in charge of
the Special Forces units in Mogadishu, Somalia, during the famous 1993 "Black Hawk Down"
incident, in which a number of Special Forces soldiers were beaten to death by warlords, and
dragged through the streets of the city. Here, some of Lt. Col. John Alexander's non-lethal
systems, including "Sticky Foam," were directly put to the combat testand failed. From March
2000 until June 2003, General Boykin headed the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare
Center. He was then named Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, a post he still
holds. According to The New Yorker piece by Hersh, Boykin and his immediate boss,
Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Stephen Cambone, are directly in charge of the
Special Operations search-and-kill squads touted by John Arquilla in his pseudo-gang promo.
Shortly after his appointment to the Deputy Undersecretary position, General Boykin drew fire, for
remarks he deliveredin uniformat a fundamentalist Christian church, in which he smeared
Islam as a "Satanic" religion, and characterized the U.S. invasion of Iraq as a religious "crusade."
He also said that "God had placed George W. Bush" into the Presidency, provoking serious
debates about his own sanity and a Pentagon Inspector General's Office probe.
First Earth BattalionWhere It All Began
According to author Jon Ronson, in 1977, Lt. Col. Jim Channon, a Vietnam War combat veteran,
wrote a letter to Lt. Gen. Walter Kerwin, then the U.S. Army Deputy Chief of Staff, proposing a
fact-finding mission to unearth ways for the U.S. military to become more "cunning." Channon
was given an open-ended assignment, a small Pentagon budget, and spent the next two years,
by his own accounts, exploring the depths of the New Age movement, seeking military
applications. Channon visited over 150 New Age facilities during his travels, with such
countercultural names as: Gentle Wind, Integral Chuan Institute, Dayspring, Inc., The Center of
Release and Integration, Postural Integration Reichian Rebirthing, the New Age Awareness Fair,
Beyond Jogging, Aikido with Ki, the Biofeedback Center of Berkeley, and the Esalen Institute.
Channon particularly spent a good deal of time training under Michael Murphy, the co-founder of
Esalen, which was the leading West Coast New Age psychological experimentation center,
testing a wide array of mind-control methods, many involving the use of psychotropic drugs.
Cultist mass murderer Charles Manson spent Aug. 5, 1969 at Esalen, just four days before he
unleashed the "Helter Skelter" murder spree, for which he is still serving a lifetime jail sentence.
Manson had been tracked, from his years in state prison, by military psychologists, who were
studying behavioral patterns of what they dubbed the "pathologically violent five percent."
In 1979, Lt. Colonel Channon presented his findings to the Army brass in a 125-page document,
complete with slides, called "The First Earth Battalion." While the document was laced with New
Age vocabulary ("The First Earth is not mission oriented, it is potential oriented. That means we
shall continue to look everywhere to find non-destructive methods of control."), Channon did
propose an array of non-lethal techniques that would be soon adopted by the military, including
the use of atonal noises as a form of combat psychological warfare, oriental martial arts and
spiritualist instruction, and widespread experimentation with psychoelectronics and other means
of debilitating enemy forces.
Channon's First Earth Battalion slide show was brought to General Stubblebine, the head of
INSCOM, by Colonel Alexander, the author of the Military Review article on "The New Mental
Battlefield," and, by 1981, Stubblebine established a secret "psychic spies unit" at Fort Meade, to
test out such dubious techniques as remote viewing.
Two years later, General Stubblebine traveled to Fort Bragg, to pitch the Channon/Alexander
program to the top leadership of the Special Operations community. By now, Stubblebine was
convinced that, with the application of the right "mind over matter" techniques, he could
personally walk through walls. As of this writing, he has not yet apparently succeeded. The Fort
Bragg session, as he would later recount it to author Ronson, was a fiasco, and no action was
taken to implement his programor so Stubblebine thought.
In reality, Fort Bragg, by 1978, was already a hotbed of mind-war experimentation. Among the
programs carried out at remote corners of the sprawling special operations base: the Goat Lab,
where a team of New Age-trained Special Forces soldiers attempted to burst the hearts of goats,
in an adjacent holding pen, through the power of psychic concentration. Veterinarians working on
the base were horrified that Special Forces planes were airlifting goats up from Central America,
without going through the normal Customs inspections. The goats were used in the training of
combat medics. The goats would be shot, their limbs would be amputated, and, on some
occasions, they were "de-bleated" by having their tongues cut out or their throats slashed. Then,
they were subjected to the Goat Lab psychic warfare tests.
Keying off of Channon's blueprint, a Special Operations experimental team, dubbed "Jedi
Warriors," after the Star Wars craze, were trained in a wide array of Eastern oriental martial arts
and meditation techniques, combined with super-strenuous physical training programs. Outside
"experts" like Dr. Jim Hardt, were brought in to train the "Jedi Warriors" to heighten their mental
telepathy skills through Zen. Following Jim Channon's First Earth Battalion recipe, Stuart Heller, a
New Age psychologist, who gave classes in stress control to corporate executives and officials at
NASA, was brought in to provide similar schooling to the commandos. Channon had been
introduced to Heller by Marilyn Ferguson, the author of the 1980 book The Aquarian Conspiracy,
which peddled a New Age version of H.G. Wells' original Open Conspiracy concept of mass
social control and cultural paradigm-shifts.
Not all the instructors of the "Jedi Warriors" were counterculture psychologists. Michael Echanis,
a Green Beret who was badly wounded in Vietnam, but later developed advanced martial art
skills, was brought in to train the "Jedi" in Hwa Rang Do, a combat technique that emphasized
"invisibility." Echanis would be killed in 1978 in Nicaragua, while working as a mercenary for the
regime of Anastasio Somoza. He had been the martial arts editor of Soldier of Fortune magazine,
a well-known hiring hall for ex-soldiers and wanna-be's, seeking their fortunes as mercenaries.
By 1983, between the INSCOM program and the black box efforts at Fort Bragg, a fairly
extensive network of military "spoon-benders" had been assembled, to the point that Task Force
Delta was created, to stage quarterly meetings of as many as 300 military occult practitioners, at
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Col. Frank Burns launched Meta Network, one of the first "chat
rooms" run through DARPA's (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) computer
networking system, that would ultimately evolve into the internet.
The scheme to create a breed of Nietzschean "super soldiers" employed some very far-out
characters, like the Israeli "spoon-bender" Uri Geller, a one-time stage magician, who was
brought into the U.S. intelligence community under the original patronage of Dr. Andrija Puharich,
a doctor who had been conducting work on parapsychology and telepathy for the U.S. Army's
Psychological Warfare Division, since the 1950s. Dr. Puharich ran the Round Table Foundation of
Electrobiology, which experimented with the manipulation of brain waves. He worked closely with
Warren S. McCulloch, one of the founders of Cybernetics, and with the British intelligence
counterculture guru, Aldous Huxley.
Wolfowitz Peddles Non-Lethal Warfare
According to author Ronson, in an October 2001 interview in London, Uri Geller confided to him
that he had been "called back" to work for the U.S. government, immediately after the Sept. 11
attacks. It seems that the Bush Administration decided that the "psychic spies" could play a
productive role in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, and in efforts to prevent a replay of the terror
attacks on New York and Washington.
In fact, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz had been a big advocate of some of
Alexander and Channon's ideas, while serving as the chief policy advisor to then-Defense
Secretary Dick Cheney in the George Herbert Walker Bush Pentagon. On March 10, 1991,
Wolfowitz wrote a memo to Cheney, "Do We Need a Non-Lethal Defense Initiative?" in which he
wrote, "A U.S. lead in non-lethal technologies will increase our options and reinforce our position
in the post-Cold War world." While Wolfowitz apparently made no mention of the more bizarre
practices promoted by Colonel Alexander, the guru of the non-lethal weaponry campaign, at the
time of Wolfowitz's memo, Alexander had retired from active duty, and had been named head of
the Non-Lethal Weapons Program at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
In 1990, Colonel Alexander had also come out with a book, The Warrior's Edge, in which he
promoted a variety of unconventional methods to promote "human excellence and optimum
performance" among soldiers, based on a course he taught in 1983 called Neuro-Linguistic
Programming (NLP). Among the students in that course were then-Senator and later Vice
President Albert Gore, Gen. Max Thurman, and General Stubblebine. By his own accounts,
Alexander and Gore became close friends in 1983, and remain so today.
Colonel Alexander wrote that the goal of The Warrior's Edge was to "unlock the door to the
extraordinary human potentials inherent in each of us. To do this, we, like governments around
the world, must take a fresh look at non-traditional methods of affecting reality. We must raise
human consciousness of the potential power of the individual body/mind systemthe power to
manipulate reality. We must be willing to retake control of our past, present, and ultimately, our
future."
Uri Geller was not the only "psychic warrior" called back to government service after 9/11. Jim
Channon, the original First Earth Battalion New Age super-soldier, according to author Ronson,
began holding a series of meetings in early 2004 with the new Army Chief of Staff, Gen. Pete
Schoomaker. Schoomaker had been commander of Special Forces at Fort Bragg when the "Goat
Lab" and "Jedi Warrior" programs were under way. Ronson wrote that "The rumor was that
General Schoomaker was considering bringing Jim back from retirement to create, or contribute
to, a new and secret think-tank, designed to encourage the army to take their minds further and
further outside the mainstream." Ronson described it as a revival of Task Force Delta. Ronson
soon received an e-mail from Channon, confirming the rumor, and explaining that the think-tank
idea had been floated "because Rumsfeld has now openly asked for creative input on the war on
terrorism ... mmmm." Channon elaborated:
"The Army has requested my services to teach the most highly selected Majors. The First Earth
Battalion is the teaching exemplar of choice. I have done that in the presence of General Pete
Schoomaker.... I am in contact with players who are or have recently been in Afghanistan and
Iraq. I have sent in exit strategy plans based on Earth Battalion ideas. I talk weekly with a
member of a stress control battalion in Iraq who carries the manual and uses it to inform his
teammates of their potential service contributions...."
Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib ... and al-Qa-im
The International Committee of the Red Cross has published a series of studies and sponsored
several international conventions, to evaluate just how "non-lethal" the non-lethal technologies
are that have been promoted by Alexander, Channon, and their ilk. According to a 1998 ICRC
presentation before the European Parliament, non-lethal weapons are simply defined as weapons
with a less-than 25% fatality rate. Such now widely used non-lethal weapons as lasers, extremely
low frequency (ELF) weapons, and various chemical, biological, and audio stun weapons, can
cause permanent damage, such as blindness, deafness, and destruction of gastrointestinal
systems, which, the ICRC insists, require serious study and a new set of international treaties and
conventions.
Indeed, according to both Ronson and The New Yorker writer Jane Mayer, many of the torture
techniques employed at Guantanamo Bay, at Abu Ghraib, and at such less-well-known locales as
al-Qa-im near the Syrian border in Iraq, are based on Channon and Alexander's non-lethal
schemes, but with lethal consequences in some cases.
Ronson confirmed that a facility at al-Qa-im was conducting "interrogations" of captured Iraqi
insurgents, after playing, non-stop, for days at a time, the theme song from Barney the Purple
Dinosaur, "I Love You." Ronson is convinced that the music was a cover for subliminal
frequencies, very high- or very low-frequency sounds that affect brain functioning, to break
prisoners' resistance. The prisoners were kept in metal shipping containers in the scorching sun,
blindfolded and in crouching positions, surrounded by barbed wire, with the music (and
subliminals) blaring.
In an article published in the July 11-18, 2005 issue of The New Yorker, Mayer revealed that
Special Forces psychologists from the Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE)
program at the JFK Special Warfare School at Fort Bragg had been brought to Guantanamo Bay,
to oversee interrogation strategies. The SERE psychologists formed a core of the Behavioral
Science Consultation Teams (BSCT, or "Biscuits") that "reverse engineered" the techniques that
were used on Special Forces soldiers, to train them to survive enemy torture/interrogations, as
part of the advanced special warfare program at Fort Bragg.
Jim Channon confirmed, in another e-mail exchange with author Ronson, that many of the ideas
adopted by the Army Intelligence interrogators at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and al-Qa-im came
right out of his First Earth Battalion blueprint.
'Living Embodiment' of First Earth Battalion
At one point in his probe of the military's spoon-benders, author Jon Ronson asked Stuart Heller,
the friend of Marilyn Ferguson and Jim Channon, if he could name one soldier who was "the living
embodiment" of the First Earth Battalion. Without a second thought, Heller replied: "Bert
Rodriguez." "Bert's one of the most spiritual guys I've ever met," Heller told Ronson. "No. Spiritual
is the wrong word. He's occultic. He's like a walking embodiment of death. He can stop you at a
distance. He can influence physical events just with his mind. If he catches your attention he can
stop you without touching you."
As Jon Ronson reported, "In April 2001, Bert Rodriguez took on a new student. His name was
Ziad Jarrah. Ziad just turned up at the US 1 Fitness Center one day and said he had heard that
Bert was good. Why Ziad chose Bert, of all the martial arts instructors scattered around the
Florida shoreline, is a matter of speculation. Maybe Bert's uniquely occultic reputation preceded
him, or perhaps it was Bert's military connections. Plus, Bert had once taught the head of security
for a Saudi prince. Maybe that was it."
Ziad Jarrah presented himself as a Lebanese businessman, who traveled a great deal and
wanted to protect himself. "I liked Ziad a lot," Rodriguez later told Ronson. "He was very humble,
very quiet. He was in good shape. Very diligent." Rodriguez taught Jarrah "the choke hold and
the kamikaze spirit. You need a code you'd die for, a do-or-die desire." Rodriguez added, "Ziad
was like Luke Skywalker. You know when Luke walks the invisible path? You have to believe it's
there. And if you do believe it it is there. Yeah, Ziad believed it. He was like Luke Skywalker."
Rodriguez trained Ziad Jarrah for six months, and gave him copies of several knife-fighting books
he had written. Jarrah shared them with a friend, Marwan al-Shehhi, who boarded with him at the
Panther Motel and Apartments in Deerfield Beach, Fla.
On Sept. 11, 2001, Ziad Jarrah took control of United Airlines flight 93, and crashed it in a field in
Pennsylvania. Marwan al-Shehhi commandeered United Airlines flight 175 and crashed it into the
South Tower of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan.
Subscribe to EIW
Stan J Caterbone
Project Hope Foundation
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY,

PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
IN RE:
MEGHAN . LIAPPATT V
:
:
Docket No. CI-08-04781
CD 6 208A
AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF A CLOSED HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:
AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se,
Project Hope Foundation, and Advanced Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above
captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as Project Hope being an advocate and a 501
(3) ( c ) non-profit foundation focusing in mental health issues and mental health awareness;
Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group having similar mental health issues before the
courts with a history and experience of how misaligned community attitudes towards persons labeled
with mental health problems can carry an unnecessary and costly burden and stigma.
This amicus provides a voice for the movants as well as providing another perspective
and opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters
presented in this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the
opinion and ORDER of James P. Cullen of July 11, 2008 which ruled against a closed hearing.
Stanley J. Caterbone appeared pro se before a 7303 Section 303 Of The Pennsylvania
Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7303 hearing in the Lancaster General Hospital on April 7,
2006 and had a successful conclusion in arguing against commitment and treatment. Stanley
J. Caterbone was released after a 5-day evaluation, which is also being challenged in the
courts.
July 21, 2008 _________
Respectfully Submitted:
__________________
__________________
SSS
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Page 1 of 35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. BACKGROUND OF MOVANTS
Page 3
a. Stanley J. Caterbone
b. Project Hope
c. Advanced Media Group
2. PREFACE TO ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT
Page 7
3. ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT
Page 8
a. I) Should The Hearing On The Commonwealths Amended Petition Under

Section 304 Of The Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304 Is
Open To The Public?
b. II) Did The Court Give Due Consideration To The Claims By Meghan Lippiatt
Regarding Retaliation By The Public During And After A Public Hearing On
The Issues?
4. CONCLUSION _
Page 11
5. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Page 12
6. EXHIBITS ___
Page 13
a. Jonathon Turley Post of December 13, 2007
Page 13
b. Biography of Jonathan Turley
Page 16
c. Conditional Release and Mandated Outpatient Treatment

By George F. Parker, M.D.
Page 29
d. Griffin PA, Steadman HJ, Heilbrun K

e.
A Look Behind the Scenes of HIPAA and the

Privacy Rule
f.
Page 22
Page 24
Federal Oversight of Psychiatric Records:

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Page 28
g. More protections for patients and psychologists

under HIPAA
Page 33
Page 2 of 35
BACKGROUND OF MOVANTS
Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE)
CATERBONE has been following very closely the case of Meghan Lippiatt and was a witness
to the trial on one of the few last days before the Honorable Judge James P. Cullen in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas to hear the testimony of Psychiatrist Dr. Gotlieb of the
Lancaster General Hospital.
CATERBONE had also written a response on the blog of nationally
known law expert and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turnley on December 19, 2007 days after
the conclusion of the trial. Jonathan Turley, like other national experts, had posted an opinion on
the Lippiatt case after the verdict and conclusion of the trial. The response is EXHIBIT A.
CATERBONE has been involved with Project Hope Foundation for more than 10 years and
has conducted extensive research in the field of mental illness and has been an advocate for
mental illness for almost 3 decades.
Mental illness has been an issue in his family since the
1960s and has been an extremely challenging dilemma resulting in the untimely and suspicious
deaths of two brothers in their 30s.
His oldest brother died in Santa Barbara, California on
Christmas day of 1984 with the death being ruled a suicide, but now known to have been a
murder. In 1996 his youngest brother, Tom had committed suicide and the circums tances are
currently being litigated in the federal courts as a wrongful death complaint.
CATERBONE has
researched and investigated the causes of both deaths as it relates to the issue of mental illness
and has conducted research and instigations into his own malicious diagnosis of his own mental
health record. His father, Samuel, has a history of mental health records however; he too has a
history of psychic phenomena and a history of suspicious activities with the United States
Government and the Lancaster community. His mental health record is also in dispute. He was a
very successful businessman and had served in the U.S. Navy as a radioman and graduated from
gunner school with honors. He also developed new technologies for the Dry Cleaning industry. He
has also conducted extensive research into areas concerning U.S. Government activities.
CATERBONE has developed relationships with mental health professionals for his work with
Project Hope and has been the main person responsible for coordinating and administrating the
mission of creating awareness and education to the community-at-large with the distribution of
Project Hopes video Numbers Dont Lie; including to the Mental Health and Retardation
Department of the County of Lancaster this past year. CATERBONE has worked extensively with
Contact Lancaster, the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, and other mental health
organizations as well faith based organizations.
CATERBONE had dealings with national
professionals and organizations in the field; especially since C. EvreTt Koop, the former U.S.
Surgeon General and Tipor Gore made mental health awareness a top priority in 1998. Tipor Gore
also received the Project Hope video for distribution as a resource for other non-profit
organizations. CATERBONES research includes national and local trends of suicides; symptomatic
Page 3 of 35
behavior in bi-polar and manic depression; and the issues and stigma confronting those affected
with mental illnesses.
CATERBONE brings a unique perspective to the courts that may help to shed light into how
people with mental illnesses are treated unfairly by family, friends, and the community-at-large.
It should be noted that CATERBONE is also telepathic with a history of psychic traits in his family
dating back 2 generations. CATERBONE is currently engaged in extensive litigation challenging his
own mental health record, treatment, and diagnosis in federal and state courts. His own mental
health record includes 2 fabricated suicide stories that are part of the record in hospitals and with
police departments; this is in addition to the 30 false arrests. Mental health and criminal records
can be very damaging in destroying a persons credibility and reputation and ultimately his
professional and personal life if not respected by all.
CATERBONE is presently the founder of Advanced Media Group and conducts his business
from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. For the past several years, in addition to appearing before
the courts as a pro se litigator, Advanced Media Group has been developing several business
interests in the revitalization of downtown Lancaster,
Those projects include a downtown UPS
Copy and Shipping Store; the Theater at Hotel Brunswick; and the Excelsior Place Business Plan,
In 2006 CATERBONE began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which
is listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., a full service financial firm, CATERBONE has drawn upon the success in developing the
strategic vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public
offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial.
In 2005 CATERBONE, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in
current litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the
United States Third District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights,
anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to
this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. CATERBONE was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
Page 4 of 35
A complete biography and history is located on the website of Advanced Media Group at:
PROJECT HOPE
Project Hope Foundation was founded in 1996 after the untimely suicide of Thomas P. Caterbone,
brother of Stanley J. Caterbone.
Project Hope was initially formed by another brother, Dr. Phillip
W. Caterbone of Austin Texas, and other friends and relatives that wanted to continue the legacy
of Tom Caterbone and make a contribution to the community-at-large in dealing with mental
health issues and mental health awareness.
In 1996 Project Hope Foundation produced the extremely successful instructional video Numbers
Dont Lie for helping teenagers deal with suicide and help them to identify kids which may be at
risk. The video was produced and directed by Dr. Phil Caterbone & Psychologist Craig Crabtree,
both of Austin, Texas. The video is a approximately 20 minutes and is accompanied by an
instructional workbook for the monitors and a workbook for the students. "Numbers Don't Lie"
has been sold to the Texas School Board of Education to pay for its development and production.
The video has been provided to other Faith Based non-profit organizations, school districts, church
groups, and municipalities by CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group over the past 10 years.
The video can be viewed online at: www.advancedmediagroup.youtube.com and clic king on the
Numbers Dont Lie video.
Project Hope provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact/Lifeline
of Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. In 1999 Project Hope donated and constructed a soccer
field on the new Headquarters of the Schreiber Pediatric Center on Goods Road, in Lancaster.
Tom's Project Hope is funded by an annual golf tournament on the 1st Saturday in August, called
the Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf Tournament.
The Lancaster County Mental Health/Mental Retardation department is currently using the video
as a resource Mental Health/Mental Retardation Department.
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
In 1989 CATERBONE founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., which was one of only 4 or 65
U.S. domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's.
Advanced Media
Group also developed tools, applic ations, and provided consulting to information technologies.
Page 5 of 35
Advanced Media did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational
institutions, and foreign companies including the Department of Defense; NASA, National
Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST); Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA); and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence
Agency; (CIA), IBM; Microsoft, AMP; Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers;
and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems; which was developing
various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is
the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the Internet and is often used in
delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies.
Advanced Media Group now has interests in various business and fields including the film and
entertainment industries; information technologies; revitalizations of downtown Lancaster;
Research and Study in Mind Control and ESP; and the fulfillment and distribution of past
intellectual property assets.
PREFACE TO ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT1
Upon the verdict of the lower court trial of not guilty by reason of insanity, CATERBONE
posed the question of why a condition for release of a psychiatric evaluation was not issued by
presiding Judge James P. Cullen. This is evident in the Jonathan Turley Post of December 19,
2007 which states the following:
Here is a brief synopsis; In the VERDICT ORDER there did not seam
to be any condition for Ms. Liappatt to be held in custody until a
further psychiatric evaluation could be performed. This set in motion
a number of court filings by the District Attorney, the Defense
Counsel, and others trying to recommit her to a treatment facility.
There has been much research done on the subject of conditional releases in not guilty by
reason of insanity cases throughout this country and most all have concluded that conditional
releases are a very acceptable and successful legal alternative to quell the public fear and
animosity of persons getting away with murder.
In most cases the person is subject to a
variety of post verdict mental health treatment plans that may include community participation
The legal opinion of Stan J. Caterbone was formulated on or before December 19, 2007 prior
to conducting any research on the topic or using any internet search engine to define the words
conditional release or any similar terminology. Stan J. Caterbone again is suspicious of the
dates of the post on the Jonathan Turley blog of December 19, 2007. The post may have been
posted prior to that date.
Page 6 of 35
until it can be proven by a certified psychiatrist that the person no longer poses any threat to
society before being released into the community.2 3
ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT
1. WETHER THE HEARING ON THE COMMONWEALTHS AMENDED PETITION UNDER
SECTION 304 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES ACT P.S. 7304 IS
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
2. DID THE COURT GIVE DUE CONSIDERATION TO THE CLAIMS BY MEGHAN LIPPIATT
REGARDING RETALIATION BY THE PUBLIC DURING AND AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE ISSUES.
I) SHOULD THE HEARING ON THE COMMONWEALTHS AMENDED PETITION UNDER

SECTION 304 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MENTAL HEALTH PROCEDURES ACT P.S. 7304
IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC?
Section 304 of the Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304
7304. Court-Ordered Involuntary Treatment Not To Exceed Ninety Days.

(a) Persons for Whom Application May be Made.-1. A person who is severely mentally disabled and in need of treatment, as
defined in section 301(a), may be made subject to court-ordered
involuntary treatment upon a determination of clear and present danger
under section 301(b)(1) (serious bodily harm to others), or section
301(b)(2)(i) (inability to care for himself, creating a danger of death or
serious harm to himself), or 301(b)(2)(ii) (attempted suicide), or
301(b)(2)(iii) (self- mutilation).
2. Where a petition is filed for a person already subject to involuntary
treatment, it shall be sufficient to represent, and upon hearing to
reestablish, that the conduct originally required by section 301 in fact
occurred, and that his condition continues to evidence a clear and present
danger to himself or others. In such event, it shall not be necessary to
show the reoccurrence of dangerous conduct, either harmful or
debilitating within the past 30 days.
2
Geoge M. Parker, MD Under conditional release, such acquittees are released into the
community with various conditions imposed; for example, they are often required to live in
specified housing and not to use illegal drugs. They remain under the jurisdiction of a criminal
judge or a central monitoring agency, such as a psychiatric security review board. Adherence to
mental health treatment in the community is almost always a condition of release. As leverage,
this type of mandated community treatment uses both avoidance of jail and avoidance of
hospitalizationboth a brief jail stay and rehospitalization are possible consequences of
violation of the conditions of release, depending on the state. See Exhibit B.
3
See Exhibits A thru D.
Page 7 of 35
(c) Procedures for Initiating Court-ordered Involuntary Treatment for

Persons Not in Involuntary Treatment.-1. Any responsible party may file a petition in the court of common pleas
requesting court-ordered involuntary treatment for any person not
already in involuntary treatment for whom application could be made
under subsection (a).
2. The petition shall be in writing upon a form adopted by the department
and shall set forth facts constituting reasonable grounds to believe that
the person is within the criteria for court-ordered treatment set forth in
subsection (a). The petition shall state the name of any examining
physician and the substance of his opinion regarding the mental condition
of the person.
3. Upon a determination that the petition sets forth such reasonable cause,
the court shall appoint an attorney to represent the person and set a date
for the hearing as soon as practicable. The attorney shall represent the
person unless it shall appear that he can afford, and desires to have,
private representation.
4. The court, by summons, shall direct the person to appear for a hearing.
The court may issue a warrant directing a person authorized by the
county administrator or a peace officer to bring such person before the
court at the time of the hearing if there are reasonable grounds to believe
that the person will not appear voluntarily. A copy of the petition shall be
served on such person at least three days before the hearing together
with a notice advising him that an attorney has been appointed who shall
represent him unless he obtains an attorney himself, that he has a right
to be assisted in the proceedings by an expert in the field of mental
health, and that he may request or be made subject to psychiatric
examination under subsection (c)(5).
5. Upon motion of either the petitioner or the person, or upon its own
motion, the court may order the person to be examined by a psychiatrist
appointed by the court. Such examination shall be conducted on an
outpatient basis, and the person shall have the right to have counsel
present. A report of the examination shall be given to the court and
counsel at least 48 hours prior to the hearing.
6. Involuntary treatment shall not be authorized during the pendency of a
petition except in accordance with section 302 or section 303.
(e) Hearings of Petition for Court-order Involuntary Treatment.--A
hearing on a petition for court-ordered involuntary treatment shall be conducted
according to the following:
1. The person shall have the right to counsel and to the assistance of an
expert in mental health.
2. The person shall not be called as a witness without his consent.
3. The person shall have the right to confront and cross-examine all
witnesses and to present evidence in his own behalf.
4. The hearing shall be public unless it is requested to be

private by the person or his counsel.
5. A stenographic or other sufficient record shall be made, which shall be
impounded by the court and may be obtained or examined only upon the
Page 8 of 35
request of the person or his counsel or by order of the court on good

cause shown.
6. The hearing shall be conducted by a judge or by a mental health review
officer and may be held at a location other than a courthouse when doing
so appears to be in the best interest of the person.
A decision shall be rendered within 48 hours after the close of evidence.
Under Section (e) 4. of the Section 304 of the Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures
Act P.S. 7304 it clearly states the following:
The hearing shall be public unless it is requested to be
private by the person or his counsel.
In Judge James P. Cullen ORDER and OPINION of July 11, 2008 Judge Cullen appears to
be abusing his discretion by mandating a higher burden and threshold for showing good cause
why Ms. Lippiatt is entitled to her request of a closed hearing. It also appears that Judge Cullen
is trying to pacify the public interest and outcry when Meghan Liappitts was released at the
conclusion of her trial, which should have been addressed with a condition for release, which
Judge James P. Cullen failed to address in his VERDICT ORDER of December 13, 2008.
HIPAA CONSIDERATIONS
The privacy laws of health records addressed with the passage if the Health Information
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996 may have some controlling interest in these
matters. A summary of HIPAA is as follows:
A major upshot of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) of 1996 is a series of federal rules that have a considerable impact on
providers and patients their interactions, their rights, and their responsibilities.
In sorting through the details and compliance requirements of the privacy rule in
particular, it helps for practitioners to know something of the historical and
political context in which HIPAA and the rules that resulted from this law took
shape.
Under HIPAA, Congress tasked the Department of Health Human Services (HHS)
with developing federal rules that govern how patient records are handled,
shared, and protected in the health care system. The transactions rule, the
first rule promulgated by HHS, provides for standard formatting of electronic
patient records for health care claims and other purposes. This rule benefits
health professionals by making it easier for them to work with uniform rather
than multiple claims forms. While more rules will follow, the 800-pound gorilla
of the series, the privacy rule, was finalized last April. The privacy rule
provides some important protections for psychology records, with provisions that
will impact the confidentiality of the psychologist-patient relationship. 4
See Exhibit F: A Look Behind the Scenes of HIPAA and the Privacy Rule by Doug Walter, J.D.
Page 9 of 35
An Open Hearing would be placing mental health records in the public domain
and may be a violation of the rights of Ms. Lippiatt as defined in the HIPAA code.
The general public really has no interest in the process or the Section 304 of the
Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304 hearing, but rather has an interest in the
conclusion of the hearing in protecting itself from someone whom may pose a danger or threat
to others. That danger and or threat to the community-at-large is not compromised nor is it
supported by an open hearing. That danger and or threat is only of importance and relevant if
Ms. Lippiatt is found to have a mental health illness and is not committed for treatment. The
question of an open or closed hearing is not relevant, only the conclusion of the matters that
will be presented to the courts.
II) DID THE COURT GIVE DUE CONSIDERATION TO THE CLAIMS BY MEGHAN LIPPIATT
REGARDING RETALIATION BY THE PUBLIC DURING AND AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE ISSUES?
Stanley J. Caterbone has been subject to an unprecedented history of retaliation and
intimidation that has been the result of a stigma due to his mental health record. Although this
mental health records validity and authenticity is being challenged in several courts, the stigma
and treatment by the community-at-large is real and can be used to substantiate Ms. Lippiatts
claim of retaliation in her opposition to an open hearing. Subjecting Ms. Lippiatt to unnecessary
intimidation and retaliation for information that would be made public during an open hearing is of
concern to all who may face similar circumstances.
Stanley J. Caterbone has a criminal record of some 30 false arrests in Lancaster County
that would have never been possible without his mental health record. Law enforcement relied
upon the fact that Stanley J. Caterbone had a history and mental health record to discredit him
before the courts, in his arrests, although he was successful in having those arrests and
convictions dismissed and overturned.
Stanley J. Caterbone also must endure a systematic and problematic attack of harassment
in public that is also due to the same mental health record and his fabricated and diminished
reputation caused by the same.
The fact that Ms. Lippiatt was found not guilty by reason of insanity of murdering her small
children should compel the court to consider her claims of retaliation more seriously. If the courts
do no recognize the risks involved to Ms. Lippiatt and others that may come before the courts in
similar circumstances, the courts should be compelled to provide the burden of proof that would
Page 10 of 35
be considered in closing the hearing for the same said reasons.
CONCLUSION
The Lippiatt case is apparently precedent in the County of Lancaster of a person being found
not guilty by reason of insanity. That being the case, the court should take extra precaution in
protecting all parties in all related matters and should be careful when reaching opinions and
conclusion that will be precedent to future and similar parties that will come before the courts.
Judge Cullens ORDER and OPINION of July 11, 2008 fails to protect the rights of Ms. Lippiatt
and others that may come before the courts, but does so unnecessarily. Closing the hearing to
the general public would not diminish the public interest, nor would it make the general public
safer. Only a conclusion of an involuntary commitment of Ms. Lippiatt IF she does now possess a
mental health illness that does pose a threat or danger to others.
July 21, 2008 _________
__________________
__________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Page 11 of 35
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Service was made on this 21s t day of July 2008 upon the following by way of electronic
mails; first class U.S. mails; or personal delivery at the addresses set forth below:
Kelley M. Sekula, Esq, ADA

Lancaster County District Attorney Office
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Julie M. Cooper, Esq.,
Street: 222 South Market Street
Elizabethtown, pa 17022-2439
Phone: (717) 367-1370
George C. Werner, Esq.,
Barley Snyder, LLC
126 East King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Alspach & Ryder (Ryder, Bruce P)
232 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602-5205
Phone: (717) 393-3939
July 21, 2008 _________
__________________
__________________
Stanley J Caterbone, Pro Se

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Page 12 of 35
EXHIBIT A
Page 13 of 35
The following can be viewed online at: http://jonathanturley.org

And search on LIPPIATT
Pa. Woman Who Killed Her Two Children Found Not Guilty by
Reason of Insanity
Published 1, December 11, 2007 Criminal law , Justice by Jonathan Turley
Meghan Lippiatt has been found not guilty by reason of insanity in a Lancaster court. Lippiatt
admitted suffocating her infant son and drowning her 2-year-old son in 2004.
The killing two-year-old Silas and his four- month-old brother Miles occurred weeks after a
break-up with her husband.
Lippiatt called 911 and told the operator: I did something really bad, I just killed my kids.
She later tried to kill herself and left a note which read: I am sorry, I didnt want to hurt
anyone. I am sorry, goodbye, please help me from the grave.
There is growing interest in allowing greater use of the insanity defense after it was heavily
curtailed after the shooting of President Ronald Reagan.
For a prior column on the insanity defense, click here
For the full story, click here
Response to Pa. Woman Who Killed Her Two Children Found

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
CATERBONE of Advanced Media Group wrote:
December 19, 2007
Dear Mr. Turley,
First of all I always look for your opinion when issues are looking for expert constitutional
scholars. I have been an avid learner of your opinion for many, many years.
Regarding this case, I dont know if you are aware, but there was a problem and fiasco after
the trial and wondered what your opinion was. She was freed immediately after her bench trial
upon a Habeas corpus filed by her defense counsel. See the following news account:
http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/213886
Here is a brief synopsis; In the VERDICT ORDER there did not seam to be any condition for Ms.
Liappatt to be held in custody until a further psychiatric evaluation could be performed. This set
in motion a number of court filings by the District Attorney, the Defense Counsel, and others
trying to recommit her to a treatment facility.
The following was my ema il to someone regarding my suspicion, I have later found that
temporary insanity, if in his verdict would free her immediately after trial:
December 18, 2007
To Ron Harper of http://www.5thestate.com
Are you following this case at all? This is truly a first class Lancaster County
smoke and mirrors game?
Page 14 of 35
This is my analysis. And for the record, I did attend the trial and sat to hear
Gottlieb, the psychiatrist testify and be cross-examined. I have also studied
mental health issues for Project Hope, for my own case, and for my familys
different cases, especially my father and brothers Sam and Tom; for over 20
years. So I am not uneducated with the issues.
Being that this is the first such verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity in
Lancaster County, as reported, I think this whole case was purposely
mismanaged so that the next time such a verdict is before a Lancaster County
jury, they can say see, if you find the defendant not guilty by insanity, that
person may be released and freed without any treatment or conditions.
I think Judge Cullen should have to explain why he did not issue a
condition in his verdict to have Ms. Lippiatt held in Lancaster County
Prison or transferred to a mental health facility until the outcome of a
psychiatric evaluation. I dont understand why he did not do this, unless
the law prevented him from doing that. I will have to research this.
I would love to hear your opinion, if you find the time. Hope to meet you in the
future.
STAN J. CATERBONE
Page 15 of 35
EXHIBIT B
Page 16 of 35
Bio of JONATHAN TURLEY

Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively
in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three
dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell,
Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, and other schools.
After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the George Washington faculty in
1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law, the
youngest chaired professor in the schools history. In addition to his extensive publications,
Professor Turley has served as counsel in some of the most notable cases in the last two
decades ranging, representing whistleblowers, military personnel, and a wide range of other
clients. These include his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada;
the nuclear couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric
Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four former
United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation. In the Foretich
case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking down a federal statute
through a rare bill of attainder challenge. Professor Turley has also served as counsel in a
variety of national security cases, including espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the
highest ranking CIA officer ever accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense
counsel in the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for
alleged spying for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler,
who is facing criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of
plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence Committee
staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence Estimate to the New
York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all allegations).
Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali Al-Timimi, who was convicted in
Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the United States. He also represents Dr. Sami AlArian, accused of being the American leader of a terrorist organization while he was a
university professor in Florida. He also currently represents pilots approaching or over the age
of 60 in their challenge to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. Turley has
served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues, including the Florida
House of Representatives.
Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and
statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation. Professor Turley is also a nationally
recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited
public intellectuals in the recent study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be
the second most cited law professor in the country. In 2008, he was ranked in a study of the
nations top 500 lawyers - one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked as
one of the nations top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top 40 lawyers
under 40.
Professor Turleys articles on legal and policy issues appear regularly in national publications
with over 500 articles in such newspapers as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA
Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. He is on the Board of Contributors of USA
Today. In 2005, Turley was given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy
for his columns on civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine.
Professor Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television
networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal Analyst for NBC
News and CBS News to cover stories that ranged from the Clinton impeachment to the
presidential elections. Professor Turley is often a guest on Sunday talk shows with over twodozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This Week, Face the Nation, and Fox
Sunday.Professor Turley teaches courses on constitutional law, constitutional criminal law,
environmental law, litigation, and torts. He is the founder and exectuve director of the Project
for Older Prisoners (POPS).
Page 17 of 35
Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and his J.D. at Northwestern. (In
2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from John Marshall Law School for his
contributions to civil liberties and the public interest).
For further information: Ms. Kristen Hilderbrand 202-994-0537
Page 18 of 35
EXHIBIT C
Page 19 of 35
Letters
Conditional Release and Mandated Outpatient Treatment
George F. Parker, M.D.
To the Editor: In the thoughtful and stimulating article on mandated outpatient treatment by
Monahan and colleagues in the September 2001 issue (1), little mention was made of the fairly
substantial literature on mandated treatment of forensic populations in the community.
Conditional release has been used for decades as a technique for managing the risks inherent in
returning a person found not guilty by reason of insanity to the community.
Under conditional release, such acquittees are released into the community with various
conditions imposed; for example, they are often required to live in specified housing and not to
use illegal drugs. They remain under the jurisdiction of a criminal judge or a central monitoring
agency, such as a psychiatric security review board. Adherence to mental health treatment in
the community is almost always a condition of release. As leverage, this type of mandated
community treatment uses both avoidance of jail and avoidance of hospitalizationboth a brief
jail stay and rehospitalization are possible consequences of violation of the conditions of
release, depending on the state.
I recently conducted a thorough literature search, using PubMed and manual strategies, on the
topic of conditional release for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity. I found more than
60 articles, including more than 30 published in the past ten years. Many of the earlier studies
on conditional release focused on the demographic characteristics of persons found not guilty by
reason of insanity. However, most of the articles on this subject for the past 30 years have
reported arrest rates and hospitalization rates of persons on conditional release. A recent metaanalysis on this issue, based on statewide results from New York, California, and Oregon, found
estimated annual arrest rates to range from 3.4 to 7.9 percent, while the estimated annual
hospitalizatio n rates ranged from 14.5 to 25.8 percent (2,3). I recently presented a poster at
the annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law showing that among
persons receiving assertive community treatment the annual arrest rate was 1.2 percent and
the annual hospitalization rate was 14.5 percent (4). In addition, some of the published reports
have included statistical models for factors that are predictive of the granting or revocation of
conditional release (5).
The literature on conditional release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity thus may
hold some of the answers to the many questions about mandated community treatment posed
by Monahan and colleagues. In particular, the issues of the process of mandating treatment,
the outcomes of programs both for the individual and for the systemthat do mandate
treatment, and the legal, ethical, and political questions that result from mandating treatment
in the community have all been discussed, to greater or lesser degrees, in the conditional
release literature over the past 30 years.
Footnotes
Dr. Parker is associate professor of clinical psychiatry at Indiana University School of Medicine
in Indianapolis.
References
1. Monahan J, Bonnie RJ, Appelbaum PS, et al: Mandated community treatment: beyond
outpatient
commitment.
Psychiatric
Services
52:1198-1205,
2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Wiederanders MR, Bromley DL, Choate PA: Forensic conditional release programs and
outcomes in three states. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20:249-257,
1997[CrossRef][Medline]
Page 20 of 35
3. Harris VL: Insanity acquittees and rearrest: the past 24 years. Journal of the American
Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28:225-231, 2000[Medline]
4. Parker GF: Low reoffense rate in a conditional release program. Poster presented at the
annual meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Boston, Oct 25-28,
2001
5. Callahan LA, Silver E: Factors associated with the conditional release of persons
acquitted by reason of insanity: a decision tree approach. Law and Human Behavior
22:147-163, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Page 21 of 35
EXHIBIT D
Page 22 of 35
Griffin PA, Steadman HJ, Heilbrun K.

Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services,
Richmond 23214.
Monitored treatment in the community, also known as conditional release, has been described
a s the most important advance in the treatment of insanity acquittees in the last decade.
Despite the importance of the development of conditional release, however, there has been
relatively little written about relevant issues and planning principles important in designing and
implementing conditional release systems. The present paper discusses important
considerations relevant to conditional release that are associated with key decision points
within systems for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). Four planning
principles, generalizable to all NGRI systems, are then presented in a way that integrates the
previous discussion. It is concluded that conditional release plays a crucial role in the treatment
of insanity acquittees and that mental health administrators may either proactively modify their
systems, in a way that balances public safety with individual rights and treatment needs, or
wait for the modification mandate to be forced upon them in the wake of a highly publicized,
heinous offense.
Page 23 of 35
EXHIBIT E
Page 24 of 35
A Look Behind the Scenes of HIPAA and the Privacy Rule

by Doug Walter, J.D.
A major upshot of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 is a
series of federal rules that have a considerable impact on providers and patients their
interactions, their rights, and their responsibilities. In sorting through the details and
compliance requirements of the privacy rule in particular, it helps for practitioners to know
something of the historical and political context in which HIPAA and the rules that resulted
from this law took shape.
Under HIPAA, Congress tasked the Department of Health Human Services (HHS) with
developing federal rules that govern how patient records are handled, shared, and protected
in the health care system. The transactions rule, the first rule promulgated by HHS, provides
for standard formatting of electronic patient records for health care claims and other
purposes. This rule benefits health professionals by making it easier for them to work with
uniform rather than multiple claims forms. While more rules will follow, the 800-pound
gorilla of the series, the privacy rule, was finalized last April. The privacy rule provides
some important protections for psychology records, with provisions that will impact the
confidentiality of the psychologist-patient relationship.
The privacy rule may be divided into three parts. The provisions of the first part address when
and how patient records may be used and disclosed among treating providers and to third
parties. The second part provides patients with certain rights regarding their records, such as
the right to access and amend records. The third part outlines administrative requirements
that psychologists and other health care professionals and entities must follow in using and
disclosing patient records.
In essence, the privacy rule affords psychologists new protections regarding the records of
their patients, but it also requires psychologists to proactively ensure the protection of records
through certain administrative requirements. These include, for example, providing patients
with information about their privacy rights, implementing procedures to ensure records
privacy, and securing records in offices.
While the privacy rule includes some requirements already contained in various state laws,
some of the federal rules mandates are new. The rule may be understood, however, as
providing a national floor of patient records protections upon which states may build further
protections, since Congress has specifically provided that state laws providing for greater
records protection will not be preempted by the federal rule.
Some may question why a federal privacy rule was promulgated in the first place, since many
state laws already protect the privacy of patient records. The short answer is that state laws
vary in the extent to which they protect patient records privacy, particularly mental health
records. A federal floor of protection provides a baseline uniformity of records protection. The
long answer is rooted in the history leading to promulgation of the privacy rule.
The Stage for Conflict Is Set
HIPAA legislation and rulemaking, including development of the privacy rule, have much to do
with the emergence of managed care organizations (MCOs) in the early 1990s as the primary
payers for health care. Unlike insurers in the fee-for-service system, MCOs began demanding
broad access to patient records for payment and administrative purposes. Patients and
providers balked and fought to keep sensitive personal information outside of the claims management process.
Page 25 of 35
management process.
By the mid 1990s, the insurance and business lobbies began pitching to Congress that a
uniform, electronic patient records system to standardize health insurance claims processing,
dubbed administrative simplification, would save the health care system billions of dollars
and relieve the inefficiency and fragmentation in health care claims management. Insurers
were also looking for a federal law that legitimized their demands for broad access to patient
records. While organized psychology supported administrative simplification, it could not come
at a cost to records privacy.
APA was at the forefront of groups concerned that the onerous MCO demands for patient
records disclosures often for administrative purposes not directly related to patient care
had eroded confidentiality. Provider and patient organizations advocated for privacy and
security safeguards that would be needed if Congress were to mandate uniform electronic
claims processing.
The stage for political conflict therefore was set by the time President Clinton included both
patient records privacy and administrative simplification provisions in his Health Security Act
of 1993, which failed to win passage. The inclusion of these provisions shed light on the
bitter fight brewing between patients/providers and MCOs over control of records and
foreshadowed the rancorous congressional debate to come. The underlying conflict, which
continues to this day, was the force that shaped HIPAA law in general and the privacy rule
specifically.
Battle Pits Provider Groups Against Insurers
The advocacy battle began in earnest when Senator Robert Bennett (R-Utah) introduced the
Medical Records Confidentiality Act in late October 1995. The Practice Directorate was
concerned by the Bennett bills bipartisan co-sponsorship by powerful members of Congress
and by the strong support of insurers and other influential organizations. The concern arose
from APAs taking a careful look at the bills details. The directorates analysis revealed
substantial weaknesses in protecting the rights of patients and providers with respect to the
privacy of records. APA and allied groups mobilized to prevent the Bennett bill from being
included in broader health care legislation that Congress also was seriously considering that
fall. That broader legislation eventually was enacted as HIPAA.
A "Final" Rule Is Subject to Change
The political battle between insurance and patient and provider organizations continues to
this day. President George W. Bushs Administration put the HIPAA privacy rule into effect
Page 26 of 35
the rules privacy protections, and even expanding them. For example, the MHLG
continues to urge that the special privacy protection given to psychotherapy notes as
defined in the rule (see article on page 5) should be broadened to apply to other sensitive
information such as psychological testing data.
For several months, the directorates government relations staff worked to educate Congress
and the public about the need for a strong federal privacy bill, or at least a bill that would not
undermine existing state privacy laws that protected patients rights. APAs lobbying push
successfully countered the insurance industrys efforts to win inclusion of the Bennett bill in
HIPAA. In place of the Bennett bill, Congress incorporated a few sentences into HIPAA to
provide a timeline for action. Legislators gave themselves three years, until August 1999, to
enact a federal law governing records privacy and further directed that HHS would establish a
privacy rule within six months of Congress failure to meet its deadline.
Shortly after HIPAAs passage, it became increasingly clear that the patient and provider
lobbies and the insurance lobby were entrenched in polar positions. APA assessed that
Congress would not likely pass legislation. While the association continued to advocate for
appropriate privacy legislation in Congress, APA began focusing efforts on the Administration
in anticipation of a rule from HHS. Organized psychology sought a rule that would recognize
the particular privacy requirements of records associated with mental health treatment,
including the need for heightened protection for psychotherapy notes and other mental health
records.
Too Hot for Congress to Handle
Indeed, the privacy issue ultimately became too controversial for members of Congress to
handle, and HHS ended up proposing a federal privacy rule in November 1999. It looked like a
compromise for both sides of the debate. Insurers saw their broad access to records
recognized in the proposed rule. At the same time, consumers and providers had won strong
protections for records each time they were disclosed to insurers.
Throughout 2000, APA worked to ensure that the proposed rules strong patient protections
were preserved in a final rule. Meanwhile, the insurance lobby pushed to void the rule or at
least substantially weaken its protections. HHS released the final privacy rule in the last days
of the Clinton Administration in much the same form as the proposed rule. The Practice
Directorate considered the final rule a success, with qualification. For example, APA reiterated
in written comments to HHS that the privacy rule allowed insurers too much access to records
for administrative purposes not directly related to treatment. It appeared the conflict and
compromise characteristic of the legislative and rulemaking processes was reflected in the
final rule once it ultimately took effect last April.
The following chronology illustrates from 1993 through 2001 the major events and players
related to the HIPAA law and the final privacy rule from HHS.
Page 27 of 35
EXHIBIT F
Page 28 of 35
Federal Oversight of Psychiatric Records: The Health Insurance Portability and

Accountability Act
by Karen Welch
More than two years ago, I published an article on psychiatric records in Mental Health
World. This same article was included on one of the Internet editions of MHW found on our
website at www.mentalhealthworld.org. Since publishing that article, each month, I receive at
least one email asking questions about confidentiality and access to psychiatric records. The
previous MHW article on psychiatric records specifically addressed access to records and
confidentiality under New York State law. Since that article was written, the federal
government has created regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) which deal explicitly with access and confidentiality of all health care records. The
present article will summarize some of the main provisions of these regulations as they relate
to the confidentiality and access of psychiatric records.
It will also note how the HIPAA
regulations differ from New York Law.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act was passed by Congress in
1996. Final regulations regarding the privacy provisions of this law were issued by the Bush
administration in August 2002 and will become effective in April 14, 2003. These regulations
provide a comprehensive set of rules for the confidentiality and access to all health records.
Since this is a federal law, it affects everyone in the United States. The HIPAA privacy
regulations supersede any state law, to the extent that they provide greater protections than
state law. However if a states law provides greater privacy protections than HIPAA, then the
states rules apply.
General Provisions of HIPAA
HIPAA greatly expands the entities which must keep psychiatric records confidential.
Entities which are covered by the requirements of HIPAA include health care providers, health
plans and health care clearinghouses that transmit or maintain any health information via
electronic media. The definition of health plans includes group health plans, health insurance
issuers, HMOs, Medicaid programs, Medicare programs and long-term care policies.
Additionally, the law requires that business associates of covered entities which perform
services involving the use or disclosure of protected health information must enter into an
agreement to safeguard the privacy of the protected health information.
HIPAA also greatly expands the types of information that are protected. With a few
narrow exceptions, HIPAA applies to all individually identifiable health information in any form
held or transmitted by a covered entity. Individually identifiable means that it is information
from which a person can identify the person to whom it relates. The information is covered
whether it is oral or recorded. It also does not matter if it was created by a health care
provider, health plan, public health authority, employer, life insurer, school or university or
health care clearinghouse. The information may relate to past, present or future physical or
mental health or condition of an individual, the provision of health care to an individual or the
past, present or future payment of health care to an individual.
In contrast, under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, a clinical record means any
information covering or relating to the examination or treatment of a patient or client
maintained by the facility which has treated or is treating such patient or client.
Under the
New York Mental Hygiene Law, privacy protections apply to facilities that are operated or
licenced by the New York State Office of Mental Health. Additionally, the law requires that
disclosure of these records to third parties places the third party under an obligation to
maintain confidentiality.
For consumers of mental health services, the expansion of privacy protections found in
HIPAA is welcome. Often, individuals would successfully seal their clinical records under New
York law only to be thwarted by the fact that insurers or health information clearinghouses had
Page 29 of 35
created their own records which were not subject to the confidentiality provisions of New York
law. Under HIPAA, the likelihood of this problem is substantially decreased since these entities
must now maintain strict confidentiality or face the penalties under the law.
Access By Individuals to Their Own Records
HIPAA creates a general right for an individual to access his or her own health records
subject to a number of exceptions. Additionally, the comments to the regulations state that
individuals have a right of access to information used to make health care decisions or
determine whether an insurance claim will be paid. The four exceptions to the general right of
access to records are:
1) psychotherapy notes;
2) information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or use in, a civil, criminal or
administrative action and proceeding;
3) where access is prohibited by the Clincial Laboratory Improvements Amendments of
1988: or
4) records that are exempt under the regulations of the Clinical Laboratory
Improvements Amendment. The Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments of 1988 is an
act which forbids laboratories doing tests on human specimens to disclose the results to anyone
except the individual or entity who requested the test.
The definition of psychotherapy notes is notes recorded in any medium by a health
care provider who is a mental health professional documenting or analyzing the contents of a
conversation during a private counseling session or a group, joint, or family counseling
session.
Psychotherapy notes are intended to refer to a mental health professionals own
personal notes of a therapy session. Notes do not count as psychotherapy notes unless they
are kept separately from the patients medical chart.
Reviewable Denial of Access to Records
Under HIPAA, other than the unreviewable reasons discussed below, the right of a
patient to see his own chart can be restricted in only three circumstances. Each of these
circ umstances is reviewable by an appeal process.
First, a licensed health care professional may deny access if in the exercise of his
professional judgement it is determined that such access is reasonably likely to endanger the
life or physical safety of the individual or other person. Under this reason for denial, covered
entities may not deny the access on the basis of the sensitivity of the health information or the
potential for causing psychological or emotional harm. A health care professional must find
that the individual has exhibited suicidal or homicidal tendencies and that access to the records
would reasonably result in murder, suicide or other physical violence.
Second, there is a reviewable exception when the requested information relates to
another person (other than the health care provider) and in the professional judgement of the
licensed health care professional, the access would likely cause substantial harm to such
person.
Third, if the personal representative of an individual makes the request rather than the
individual himself, the request may be denied if the provision of access to records to the
personal representative is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the individual or other
person.
This scheme is somewhat different from that found in the New York Mental Hygiene
Law. Under New York law, the treating practitioner may review the information requested. If
after consideration of all factors, the practitioner determines that the requested review could
reasonably be expected to cause substantial and identifiable harm to the patient, client or
Page 30 of 35
others, the facility may deny access to all or a part of the record and may grant access to a
prepared summary of the record.
Unreviewable Denial of Access to Records.
Under HIPAA, there are five areas where an entity may deny access to records without
an opportunity for review of this denial. The areas are:
1) the exceptions to the right of access described above
2) the request of a prison inmate to see his records if obtaining such copy would
jeopardize the health, safety, security, custody or rehabilitation of the prisoner or other
inmates or the safety of the correctional staff.
3) if the protected health information is
contained in records subject to the Privacy Act;
4) the information was obtained from someone other than a health care provider under
a promise of confidentiality and the access would be reasonably likely to reveal the source of
the information.
5) a research subjects request to see his records during research, if the consent form
for the research advised that access to records would be suspended during research and the
patient signed the consent form.
Process of Review of Denial of Access
The review of a denial of the access is to be conducted by a health care professional
designated by the covered entity. This professional may not have been directly involved in
the original denial of the request for access. The review must be conducted in a
reasonable time period but the regulations do not impose deadlines on any entity. There is
no provision for judicial review of this denial.
New Yorks review procedure for a denial of access appears to be more helpful to
consumers. Under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, if access to a psychiatric record is
denied, a patient has the right to appeal for review by the Clinical Records Access Review
Committee. A client must be notified by the facility of his right to a review of the denial by
the appropriate clinical record access review committee. If the client requests this review,
the facility must within ten days of the request, transmit the record to the chairman of the
appropriate committee with a statement setting forth the specific reasons access was
denied. If access is denied by the records access review committee, a patient has a right
to seek judicial review of this denial. Court review must be commenced within 30 days of
receiving notification of the committee decision.
Procedure for Correcting Records
Under HIPAA, an individual has the right to have a covered entity amend protected
health information or records about the individual in a designated record set. An
individuals request for amendment may be denied if the health information or record:
1) was not created by the covered entity;
2) is not part of the designated record set;
3) would not otherwise be available for inspection by the individual;
4) is accurate and complete.
An individual should make a request for the amendment in writing. The entity may
require [that omit DN] the individual to provide reasons to support a requested
amendment to a record. An entity must act on the request within 60 days of the request
for an amendment although this time may be extended once for 30 days if it notifies the
Page 31 of 35
individual in writing of the reasons for the delay.

If the entity agrees to make the amendment to the consumers record it must do so
and make a reasonable effort to inform others about the amendment including persons
identified by the consumer as having the information and any persons that are known by
the entity to have the records. If the entity denies the consumers request to amend the
record, the entity must provide a timely written denial. The consumer can then submit a
written statement disagreeing with the denial. This information must be appended to the
record and included in any future disclosure.
Under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, an individual may challenge the accuracy
of the information maintained in his clinical record and may require that a brief written
statement prepared by him concerning the challenged information be inserted into the
clinical record. This statement shall become part of the permanent part of the record and
shall be released whenever the clinical record at issue is released. The information to be
challenged shall be only factual statements and shall not include a providers observations,
inferences or conclusions.
For information concerning access to records, confidentiality or sealing of records, or for
other questions concerning the mental health laws, please contact the PAIMI (Protection and
Advocacy for the Mentally Ill) program at Neighborhood Legal Services, 716/847-0650.
Sources
Stefan, Susan, Q&A, What effect do the recently promulgated HIPAA regulations on
privacy of records have for the rights of my clients to access their own records?, Center for
Public Representation, August 2002
Clemens, Jane F., New Federal Regulations Expand Protections For Privacy of Health
Records,
New York State Bar Journal, June 2002.
Flannery, John, Paley, Eric, and Roland, M.K. Gaedecke, With HIPPA deadlines on
horizon, whats required?, Buffalo Law Journal, September 26, 2002
Page 32 of 35
EXHIBIT G
Page 33 of 35
More protections for patients and psychologists under HIPAA

HIPAA's psychotherapy notes provision safeguards sensitive patient information.
BY JENNIFER DAW HOLLOWAY
Monitor staff
Print version: page 22
Though the mention of the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
privacy rule compliance date--April 14--can make some psychologists anxious, most applaud
the new law for increasing privacy protections.
Especially interesting to practitioners is the psychotherapy notes provision, says Russ Newman,
PhD, JD, APA's executive director for practice. The provision recognizes that certain kinds of
mental health information need to be protected more than other types of information. Under
HIPAA, psychotherapy notes are defined as "notes recorded in any medium by a mental health
professional documenting or analyzing the contents of conversation during a private counseling
session." These notes, which capture the psychologist's impressions about the patient and can
contain information that is inappropriate for a medical record, are similar to what psychologists
have historically referred to as "process notes."
HIPAA affords psychotherapy notes more protection--most notably from third-party payers-than they'd been given in the past. Under HIPAA, disclosure of psychotherapy notes requires
more than just generalized consent; it requires patient authorization--or specific permission--to
release this sensitive information. And, whereas in the past insurance companies have
requested entire patient records--including psychotherapy notes--in making coverage
decisions, now health plans cannot refuse to provide reimbursement if a patient does not agree
to release information covered under the psychotherapy notes provision.
"In the past, patients could refuse to have this type of information released, but then the
company might refuse to cover services," notes Newman. "The HIPAA privacy rule protection
stops that kind of practice from taking place."
Psychologists take note
The privacy rule gives rights to health professionals, as well as to their patients. Under the new
law, psychologists can decide whether to release their psychotherapy notes to patients, unless
patients would have access to their psychotherapy notes under state law (see the article about
HIPAA and state laws in last month's Monitor). Though the privacy rule does afford patients the
right to access and inspect their health records, psychotherapy notes are treated differently:
Patients do not have the right to obtain a copy of these under HIPAA. And when a psychologist
denies a patient access to these notes, the denial isn't subject to a review process, as it is with
other records.
There is a catch in the psychotherapy notes provision. HIPAA's definition of psychotherapy
notes explicitly states that these notes are kept separate from the rest of an individual's record.
So, if a psychologist keeps this type of information in a patient's general chart, or if it's not
distinguishable as separate from the rest of the record, access to the information doesn't
require specific patient authorization. According to the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), it makes good sense to keep the notes separate since this type of information
should not be available automatically.
This may, says Newman, be a practical difference from the way some psychologists have
previously stored patient information. But, "if psychologists want higher protections for
psychotherapy notes, then they should keep the information separate," he urges.
Daniel Abrahamson, PhD, professional affairs coordinator for the Connecticut Psychological
Association, adds that psychologists "shouldn't jump the gun." Keeping records separate is an
option and "each practitioner will need to determine whether the benefits of maintaining extra
protection outweigh keeping the records distinctly separate from medical records," he says. In
Page 34 of 35
other words, some psychologists may decide that, for some patients, the information doesn't
particularly need the extra level of protection. If a particular treatment evolves and the
psychologist wants to keep the psychotherapy notes separate, he or she can choose to do that.
"It's part of good clinical judgment," says Abrahamson. "In the past, clinicians didn't include
some information in a record and therefore wouldn't be able to later document that
information. Now they have the option to include detailed content in separate notes."
In addition to keeping these notes separate from other patient information, psychologists
should be aware, says Newman, that there are certain parts of a record that are expressly not
considered psychotherapy notes--and that don't require patient authorization for disclosure-under the HIPAA privacy rule. This information includes medication prescription and monitoring,
counseling session start and stop times, modalities and fre quencies of treatment, results of
clinical tests, and any summary of diagnosis, functional status, treatment plans, symptoms,
prognosis or progress.
This portion of the rule is likely to leave some "potential for interpretation," says Newman.
"What if a managed-care company says it needs a summary of the themes from psychotherapy
sessions? They may say that's outside the psychotherapy notes provision. We'd argue that
divulging themes of the conversations in psychotherapy is tantamount to giving away the whole
conversation," he says.
In the same vein, testing information, like summary information, isn't included under
psychotherapy notes. APA submitted comments to HHS on both the proposed and final rules
asking that psychological test data be included in the provision. Disclosing this type of
information, says Newman, could divulge intimate details about a patient much like the
information from psychotherapy sessions. Unfortunately, he says, HHS declined to expand the
definition.
Despite the exclusion of certain information, however, the psychotherapy notes provision
should be heralded "as a significant victory for privacy advocates," says Nanci Klein, PhD,
professional affairs coordinator for the Utah Psychological Association. "Practitioners have long
found it onerous to have to release psychotherapy notes for additional treatment authorization
by managed-care companies." Now, she says, managed-care companies are only entitled to
certain types of information, not including psychotherapy notes.
"I think this defines the psychologist as the treating expert whose professional analysis and
opinion represent the core information necessary for making judgments about the necessity for
continued treatment," she adds.
This article is the second in a three-part series on HIPAA topics. The next piece, on HIPAA's
minimum necessary requirement, will appear in March.
Page 35 of 35
STATE-OF-AFFAIRS AND OBSTACLES FOR FINDING AN EQUITABLE

LEGAL AND/OR CONGRESSIONAL REMEDY
FOR VICTIMS AND TARGETS OF
U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL AND ORGANIZED STALKING
(The following are not arranged in any meaningful order.)
Obstacle 1:
In the United States John Q. Public and every other U.S. Citizen has seen
their civil liberties and civil rights erode at an accelerated rate since September 11, 2001 with
the passage and continued renewal of the Patriot Act This dilutes the eluding compassion for
our victimizations, abuses, and torturous lives that we live. The Obama Administration has been
as relentless as the Bush Administration, if not more in perpetuating this.
Obstacle 2: The preceding has allowed 1960 COINTEL-PRO like tactics to be mainstreamed by
local and federal law enforcement agencies, especially important are the abuses of the fusion
centers in helping to aggravate our victimizations and our targeting.
Obstacle 3: Advanced aspects and components of Mind Control Technologies and devices are
being mainstreamed, legalized and commercialized at an alarming rate in the few years; for
example RFID Implants, Computer to Brain and Brain to Computer Technologies, and the
development of Mind Controlled Prosthetics. This helps to dilute and blur difference between
harmful, malicious, and illegal technologies with helpful and moral technologies.
Obstacle 4:
Lack of willing and collaborating Intelligence Officer/Official and/or Military
Officer/Official to come forward as an insider as a true whistleblower of the abuses and
victimizations/experimentations that we are seeking relief that can document the technologies
and/or programs used to harm targets and victims.
Obstacle 5: Social Media and related technologies are making Organized Stalking even more
covert and more mainstreamed; even more disturbing is the accelerating trends of its potency
and power when used against us in our targeting and victimizations.
Obstacle 6: Computer Hacking is becoming more mainstreamed and synchronized with

portable wireless devices as a weapon to harass, isolate, brainwash, sabotage our lives with the
ability to create false personas to disguise the perps or discredit and ruin us, the targets.
Obstacle 7: Lack of legal evidence useful in both civil and criminal courts relating to our
targeting with specific regards to the source of the many lethal technologies and in regards to
the user responsible for its deployment.
Obstacle 8: Lack of a solid court case or cases that can provide legal precedent for our claims
in a U.S. Court of Law that has been successfully adjudicated and unsealed that relates to the
most common of our targeting and victimizations.
Obstacle 9: Lack of direct correlation and evidence between U.S. Sponsored Mind Control type
patents and the actual entities that utilize them; and victims and targets that they harm.
Obstacle 10: The long Gap-In-Time from the outing and public disclosure of the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control Project of the CIA, named MK-ULTRA (which only occurred due to the
suicide of Frank Olson) to our present day It has been some 34 plus years.
Obstacle 11: Advancement of wireless and electromagnetic type weapons that leave no trace of
deployment and no trace to its source that are constantly deployed against us.
Obstacle 12: The new breed of Non-Lethal Weapons currently being deployed by Federal and
Local Law Enforcement that are developed from similar like technologies that have been
deployed against us as targets and victims for decades.
Obstacle 13: The unfortunate ease and ambitious tactic of diagnosing our victimizations and
targeting to simulate text-book like symptoms of highly regarded psychiatric disorders and the
increased proliferation of psychiatric abuses and misdiagnosis of targets and victims. As
important is the ever increasing role and authority of local law enforcement in enforcing this
tactic to ruin and discredit targets at will through the use of illegal forced hospitalizations.
Obstacle 14: The lack of any real scientific and/or analytical manner to measure the progress
and success of most or all activism projects that will lead the targeted community to a legal or
congressional remedy.
Obstacle 15: The ease of sabotaging and discrediting activities, lives, and activism of targets
and victims through the use of social media and covert surveillance technologies that are
commercially available today to anyone with the time and limited resources that they demand.
Obstacle 16: Lack of any real Legislator/Politician/Official, or any authoritative figure with any
kind of respect and prominence to advance our issues and shine the light on our abuses and
victimizations like Church, Kennedy, and Company in the 1970s as they related to MK-ULTRA
Church Commission Hearings.
Obstacle 17: The relentless ambition and ease of falsely criminalizing any target or victim at
will by federal or local law enforcement in order to discredit and/or quite them I site the recent
handling of Federal Whistleblowers over the past several years.
Obstacle 18:
The Mass Media is owned by too few corporations.
Obstacle 19:
The recent United States Supreme Court decision of the Wal-Mart sex
discrimination case has instantaneously diluted the effectiveness of filing a class action lawsuit
of our claims as a class action complaint.
Obstacle 20: There just seems to be no good incentive for anyone in a position of authority
and integrity to champion our issues in pursuit of a remedy and relief from our targeting and
victimizations that offsets the risk of self-destruction or from becoming a target themselves.
The Military-Intelligence-Law Enforcement Complex of the United States has become way too
powerful; way too cozy; and spends way too much of our taxpayers money all while acting
above the law without proper oversight too many activities.
For all of the above reasons I have remained quiet for the last year, especially considering that I
have had enough personal experiences with Nos (13)-(15)-(17) to last a lifetime. I cannot
afford any more of those. See the attached signed affidavit regarding my targeting and
victimizations.
Stan J. Caterbone
June 29, 2011
A
c
Case No.
t
i
v
e CA 06-1538
No.
Court
Case Description
United States Federal Courts
Fulton Bank Auto Stay
Court Venue
Fed Court of Appeals
Filing
Date
Stan Caterbone/Advanced Media Group

Civil And Criminal Legal Case Management Matrix
Appeal
Date
3/3/2006
Defendants
Judges
No. 05-23059
U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition
5/23/2005
Filed May 23, 2005
Judge TwardowskiJudge Fehling
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition, Dismissed

June 13,2005 Reinstated Oct 27, 2005 Judge
Brody
They want to discharge or convert to

Chapter 7
Fulton Bank; Mellon Bank;

Stone Harbor Police;
Lancaster County Sheriffs;
Avalon Police; Lancaster
County Prison; Manheim
Township Police/
US Dept of Justice Trusee
Judge Mary McLaughlin- Stuart A.

Weiss, Esquire
George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire
Cozen O'Connor-Howard L. Kelin,
Esquire
Kegel, Kelin, Almy & GrimmGeorge T. Brubaker, Esquire
Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker,
LLC-Stephanie Carfley, Esquire
Robert W. Hallinger
Appel & Yost LLP
Judge Anita Brody
Filed on 05/16/05 after abby & Lanc Dist Atty

meeting; Judge McLaughlin found at least 15
causes of actions without my amended appeal;
must only cure statute of limitations
deficiencies; RICO and National Security
Est $50 to $350 Million
Issues
Order Reversed of Judge Twardowski
Need to Amend and talk to Tony, As

soon as PP&L turns electric back on
and get back in Office with Drivers
License**
Awarded Appeal
Judge Anita Brody
Appeal Chapter 11 Brief Due by Sept 6
See **
See **
*
*
05-cv-2288
CA-05-3689
Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present

Chapter 11 Dismissal
US Dist Court Eastern District

U.S. District Ct of Appeals
5/16/2005
6/13/2005
CA-06-4154
Appealed Order to have Brief due by

Sept 06 by Judge Fehling
8/23/2006 9/18/2006
Case-06-3395
Appeal Order to Amend Complaint by

Sept 15 2006
8/25/2006
Appeal Judge McLaughlin Due by Sept 6
Appeal Hearing for PP&L did not get

notice until day of Hearing
8/25/2006
Appeal PP&L Order Only owe about $700.00
U.S. Attorney General then U.S.

District Court for the Eastern
District
10/1/2006
ISC/Ferranti/US Attorney
General Gonzales
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
4/26/2005
8/2/2006
Drew Anthon, East of Eden

Mike Caterbone
8
9
10
11
*
*
CI-05-03644
CI-06-07376
Federal False Caims Act - ISC

Whistleblowing
PA Court of Common Pleas
S Caterbone AMG PH v. D Anthon
Eden Resort
S Caterbone v. Mike Caterbone
12
CI-06-03403
S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
13
CI-06-03401
S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
Est $45 Million plus 5%

Annual Interest from
1992
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Defaulted; filed for claim; McNeese atty

Libel,slander, email; medicine for money
26.000.00
$10,000 +
Thomas Grassel
Non Assigned
Sexual Harassment filed from last June 2005
SRPD;Fiorill,Busser,Fedor
Judge Madenspacher reasgined it All physical abuse, abuse of power, theft

to Judge Georgelis so he said
of$750 cash on Apr 5, 302 document, hospital
Illegal 5 day hospitalization Apr 5 to 10th
Charged $9889.00 by LGH; Fabricated 302
document;Officer Fedor/Busser
CI-06-03349
S Caterbone v. Lancaster General

Hospital
PA Common Pleas
4/10/2006
Lancaster General HospitalDr.

Non Assigned
Emily Preston
15
16
CI-06-07330
CI-O6~04939
S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville

S Cat AMG v Pflumm,Stabley,Mike
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
8/1/2006
5/24/2006
Harleysville Insurance
Dave, Mike, Brett, AlleyKat
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Non Payment of Insurance Claims due

$7500.00 for damaged and stolen items
Libel,slander, IFP Denied/Note Recorded
PA Common Pleas
3/8/2006
Stanley J. Caterbone
Non Assigned
Fulton Mortgage Foreclosure
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
7/26/2006
7/14/2006
PP&L Electric
PennDOT Drivers License
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Illegal Service Interuption, Business damage

Appeal Drivers License Suspension
Illegal Drivers License Siezure Non Assigned
Drivers License Under Appeal, no authority,

pulled me over in Lancaster City Jurisdiction
took Honda to Towing Yard St. Dennis in
Mountville $25 per day
17
CI-06-02271
18
19
*
*
CI-06-07188
CI-06-06658
S Caterbone AMG v. PPL Electric

S Caterbone AMG v. PennDOT
CI-06-08490
S Caterbone AMG v. M. Schaefer

Millersvill Boro Police Dept
20
PA Common Pleas
9/2/2006
Lost appeal
15% to 25% of Assets recovered in 1991 with

accumulated interest; estimated $300 Million
reclaimed
14
Fulton Bank v. S Caterbone

Foreclosure
Notes
Appeal from . Eastern Dist. Bankruptcy Court

Fulton Stay
3
4
Judement
Value
Judge Anita Brody
Fulton Bank
*
2
Description
Must Collect
Defaulted
$100,000.00 Defaulted
$300,000.00
$1,000,000.00 Defualted, May move to Federal

$7900 plus damages
Defualted
Never Recorde by Prothonetary
$97,000.00 Appeal Superior Ct

$5,000.00 Remove to Ch 11
Appeal Superior Ct
$50,000.00
TR-0001010-06 TR-000101006 Appeal by Trial De Novo for

Fiorill Citations leading to
7/13/2006 7/13/2006 Drivers License Suspension
CV-0000207-05
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. S
Caterbone; Appeal by Trial De Novo for
PA Common Pleas
Fiorill Citations
TR-0001011-06
1250 Renovations Payment
District Court 02-1-01
Y. Caterbone
DJ Sheryl Hartman
DJ Sheryl Hartman 07/11/05 Hearing
$4,958.00 Won and Collected
24 *
25
26
27
28 *
Cv-160-06
S Cat AMG v Comcast
6/27/2006
Comcast;Susan Gibson
MDJ Ballentine
Chapter 11 Illegal Interuption of Service
Awaiting Verdict from July 20th,

$5,000.00 2006
1463 MDA 2006
PA Superior Court
Fulton Bank v. S. Caterbone
PA Superior Court
8/30/2006
Fulton Bank
29 *
30 *
31
32
1462 MDA 2006

1461 MDA 2006
S Caterbone v. PennDOT
S. Caterbone v. S Regional Police
PA Superior Court
PA Superior Court
8/30/2006
8/30/2006
PennDOT
STAYED S Regional Police Dept
21
22
23 *
Fulton Mortgage Dec Judge Georgelis

Judge Collier to Judge Georgelis? Appeal Drivers License Suspen Georgelis
Appeal Amend Due by August 20 2006
Page 1 of 39
No Opinion
Motion to Quash
05/26/2015
A
c
t
i
v
e
No.
33
Case No.
Court
Case Description
Criminal District Justice
Court Venue
Filing
Date

Appeal
Date
Defendants
MDJ Eckert
MDJ Eckert to Hamilton
MDJ Eckert to Mylin
Change of Venue to Quarryville DJ by Judge

Eckert
Stan Caterbone
Judge Thomas Xavios
April 25th; 10:00 am 1259 North 10th Street,

Reading,PA 19604/610-373-4424
Stan Caterbone
Judge QuarryvilleJudge Eckert
2 Girls Walking fabricated harassment

chargesApril 2, 2006
* * CV-0000207-05
* District Justice
Harrasment; Letter about cat

Buser File Fleeing Arresting Officer

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
36
TR-0000245-06
Southern Regional Speeding &

InspectionHearing Jun 9th 9:00 am
7/7/2006 Stan Caterbone
37
TR-0003020-06
Reading Parking Meter & Inspection
TR-0000085-06
Southern Regional 2 Girls Walking

asked time when burglar in 220 Stone
Hill Went to Store for help
SP2421099
Vineland, NJ 856-691-4111 39:4-97
Stan Caterbone
39
4/3/2006
Description
Tim Deacon 236 Stone Hill Road, My Cat
Killed,Appeal due on 06/10/05 paid fine/Judicial
Complaint to file /Southern Regional file
harrassment
Filed Fleeing charges on April 10, 2006
34
35
38
Judges
Was never in Vineland, New Jersey
TR-0001010-06
Firorill Careless Driving
Stan Caterbone
41
TR-0001011-06
Firorill Careless Driving to Close
Stan Caterbone
42
43
*
*
TR-0002658-06
NT-0000220-06
Whiteford Insurance Card

Terroristic Threat Evacuate Bld

7/11/2006
4/3/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Eckert to Commins
Whiteford illegal stop said went through stope

sign, but did not.
Wagon Wheel?
44
CR-0000141-06
DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons
8/8/2006
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Hamilton to Commins
See Notes; Fabricated charges by SRPD
*
*
CR-000038506
TR-0004428-06
Disorderly Conduct
Parking Meter Violation

8/11/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Simms
MDJ Simms
Simms wrong on IFP got mad arrested me

Parking Meter
47
48
49
*
*
*
TR-0002645-06
TR-0004428-06
Comcast v. S Caterbone
Careless Driving; Stop Sign Violation
Meter Violation

4/12/2006
7/7/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Simms
Cable/Internet Past Due-See Illegal Interuption

LCPD Whiteford Lied; did not
Parking Meter
TR-0001517
TR-0005057
HIA Parking Violation


5/19/2006
6/16/2006
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Smith/Dauphin Cty

MDJ Solomon/Duaphin
Page 2 of 39
Must File Appeal, Never received

Notice for Appeal Hearing Sept
$381.00 2005Cat killed, I'm charged
$187.50 Appeal No. SA159-2006

$62.50
$247.50 Must file Appeal - All lies; burglary

Driving Violation, was never stopped
or saw any police
A complete lie, took picture, he had

$75.00 matress on top of car
45
46
*
*
*
*
*
Notes
A complete lie, Fiorill perjury, off

$287.50 duty
40
50
51
52
53
54
Judement
Value
Picking Up Sheryl; No ticket on van; lied

Parking Meter
He was on bike, never went through

stop sign, he was the one at the
$381.50 Police Station that did illusion trick
Fabricated
.073 w/ mouth wash/I turned then
they put lights on, wood hatchet in
van
Got mad when he was wrong about
IFP law, Right before Littering
Hearing, Lanc Cop would have been
made fool of
$81.89 S
$997.50 verdict on July 20 2006
$81.89 verdict on June 28 2006
Picking up Sheryl at Harrisburg
International, grounded plane,
Lance;Clinton; Wendell married on
$67.50 Sat night
$62.00
05/26/2015
No.
55
56
57 *
58
59
60 *
61 *
62 *
63
64 *
A
c
Case No.
t
i
v 2006-2 14
e 2006-215
2006-220
*
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 2006-224
Court
Case Description
Court Venue
Filing
Date

Appeal
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Judement
Value
Notes
PA Judicial Conduct Review Board

(MDJ William G. Reuter)
MDJ B. Denise Commins)
(MDJ Lm H. Eckert, Jr.)
(MDJ Stuart J. Mylh)
(MDJ Maynard A. Hamilton, Jr.)
(Judge David Reineker)
Geogelis August
Eckert
Page 3 of 39
05/26/2015
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP-STAN CATERBONE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

A
c
Case No.
t
i
v
e CA 06-1538
No.
Court
Case Description
United States Federal Courts
Fulton Bank Auto Stay
Court Venue
Fed Court of Appeals
Filing
Date
Appeal
Date
Defendants
Judges
Fulton Bank
3/3/2006
No. 05-23059
4
5
9
9
Appeal from . Eastern Dist. Bankruptcy Court

Fulton Stay
Judge TwardowskiJudge Fehling
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition, Dismissed

June 13,2005 Reinstated Oct 27, 2005 Judge
Brody
They want to discharge or convert to

Chapter 7
Filed on 05/16/05 after abby & Lanc Dist Atty

meeting; Judge McLaughlin found at least 15
causes of actions without my amended appeal;
must only cure statute of limitations
deficiencies; RICO and National Security
Est $50 to $350
Issues
Million
Need to Amend and talk to Tony, As

soon as PP&L turns electric back on
and get back in Office with Drivers
License**
Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present
5/16/2005
CA-05-3689
Chapter 11 Dismissal
6/13/2005
US Dept of Justice Trusee Judge Anita Brody
Order Reversed of Judge Twardowski
Awarded Appeal
CA 06-5117
Appealed Order to have Brief due by Sept 06

by Judge Fehling
8/23/2006
Judge Anita Brody
Appeal Chapter 11 Brief Due by Sept 6
See **
Judge Anita Brody

Judge Mary McLaughlin
Appeal PP&L Order Only owe about $700.00
Wenger, et al
ISC/Ferranti/US Attorney
General Gonzales
Judge Mary McLaughlin
06-cv-4154
06-CV-4650
Appeal Hearing for PP&L did not get notice

until day of Hearing
RICO Complaint
U.S. Attorney General then U.S.

District Court for the Eastern
District
Habeas Corpus Lanc County Prison
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Court Venue
07-cv-2151
Appeal Order to 06-5012 CH 11 Dismissal

by US DOJ Trustee
11
06-cv-3955
Appeal Order to Amend Complaint by Sept

15 2006 05-2288
06-cv-3054
Appeal Brody PP&L
Case No.

Federal False Caims Act - ISC

Whistleblowing
12
Filed May 23, 2005
Lost appeal
05-cv-2288
10
12
5/23/2005
Notes
Judge Mary McLaughlin- Stuart A.

Weiss, Esquire
George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire
Fulton Bank; Mellon
Cozen O'Connor-Howard L. Kelin,
Esquire
Bank; Stone Harbor
Police; Lancaster County Kegel, Kelin, Almy & GrimmGeorge T. Brubaker, Esquire
Sheriffs; Avalon Police;
Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, LLCLancaster County Prison; Stephanie Carfley, Esquire
Manheim Township
Robert W. Hallinger
Police/
Appel & Yost LLP
06-cv-4734
06-cv-5138
Case No.
U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition
Judement
Value
Judge Anita Brody
*
2
Description
8/25/2006
10/25/2006
10/1/2006
11/20/2006
Date
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
4/13/2007

Court Venue
8/25/2006
S Caterbone v. Mike Caterbone
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
4/26/2005
8/2/2006
Drew Anthon, East of Eden Non Assigned

Mike Caterbone
Non Assigned
Defaulted; filed for claim; McNeese atty

Libel,slander, email; medicine for money
Sexual Harassment filed from last June 2005
PA Court of Common Pleas

S Caterbone AMG PH v. D Anthon Eden
Resort
Date
US Dept of Justice Trusee
15% to 25% of Assets recovered in 1991 with

accumulated interest; estimated $300 Million
reclaimed
Est $45 Million plus

5% Annual Interest
from 1992
Value

Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
13
14
CI-05-03644
CI-06-07376
15
CI-06-03403
S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
Thomas Grassel
Non Assigned
16
CI-06-03401
S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police
PA Common Pleas
4/11/2006
SRPD;Fiorill,Busser,Fedor
Judge Madenspacher reasgined it All physical abuse, abuse of power, theft

to Judge Georgelis so he said
of$750 cash on Apr 5, 302 document, hospital
Illegal 5 day hospitalization Apr 5 to 10th
Charged $9889.00 by LGH; Fabricated 302
document;Officer Fedor/Busser
Notes
See **
See **
Value
26.000.00
$10,000 +
Notes
Must Collect
Defaulted
$100,000.00 Defaulted
$300,000.00
17
CI-06-03349
S Caterbone v. Lancaster General

Hospital
PA Common Pleas
4/10/2006
Lancaster General
HospitalDr. Emily Preston
18
CI-06-07330
CI-O6-04939
S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville

S Cat AMG v Pflumm,Stabley,Mike
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
8/1/2006
5/24/2006
Non Assigned
Harleysville Insurance
Dave, Mike, Brett, AlleyKat Non Assigned
Non Payment of Insurance Claims due

$7500.00 for damaged and stolen items
Libel,slander, IFP Denied/Note Recorded
20
CI-06-02271
Fulton Bank v. S Caterbone

Foreclosure
PA Common Pleas
3/8/2006
Non Assigned
Fulton Mortgage Foreclosure
21
22
CI-06-07188
CI-06-06658
S Caterbone AMG v. PPL Electric

S Caterbone AMG v. PennDOT
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
7/26/2006
7/14/2006
PP&L Electric
PennDOT Drivers License
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Illegal Service Interuption, Business damage

Appeal Drivers License Suspension
9/2/2006
Illegal Drivers License

Siezure
Non Assigned
Drivers License Under Appeal, no authority,

pulled me over in Lancaster City Jurisdiction
took Honda to Towing Yard St. Dennis in
Mountville $25 per day
Y. Caterbone
DJ Sheryl Hartman
DJ Sheryl Hartman 07/11/05 Hearing
$4,958.00 Won and Collected
MDJ Ballentine
Chapter 11 Illegal Interuption of Service
Awaiting Verdict from July 20th,

$5,000.00 2006
Defendants
Fulton Bank
Judges
Judge Georgelis
Description
Fulton Mortgage Dec Judge Georgelis
PennDOT
S Regional Police Dept
Judge Cullen to Judge Georgelis? Appeal Drivers License Suspen Georgelis

Judge Allison
Appeal Amend Due by August 20 2006
19
25 *
CV-0000207-05
S Caterbone AMG v. M. Schaefer

Millersvill Boro Police Dept
District Justice
1250 Renovations Payment
26 *
Cv-160-06
S Cat AMG v Comcast
6/27/2006
Comcast;Susan Gibson
CI-07-00019
CI-07-00150
Emergency Petition Set Aside Stone

Hill Road Sheriff Sale
Emergency Petition Food Stamps
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
1/2/2007
1/8/2007
Addendum 01/05/2007
CI-07-00366
CI-07-03924
Case No.
1463 MDA 2006
Emergency Injuncion
Obstruction,Fraud,Embezzlement
Caterbone v Lombardo & Office Max
PA Superior Court
Fulton Bank v. S. Caterbone
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
Court Venue
CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court
1/16/2007
5/7/2007
Date
8/30/2006
1462 MDA 2006

1461 MDA 2006
S Caterbone v. PennDOT
S. Caterbone v. S Regional Police

8/30/2006
8/30/2006
23
CI-06-08490
24
*
27 *
28 *
29 *
29
30 *
31 *
32 *
PA Common Pleas
Date
Non Assigned
4 of 39
$1,000,000.00 Defualted, May move to Federal

$7900 plus damages Defualted
Never Recorde by Prothonetary
$97,000.00 Appeal Superior Ct
$5,000.00 Remove to Ch 11
Appeal Superior Ct
$50,000.00
Value
Notes
No Opinion
05/26/2015

No.
33
34
35
36
37
A
c
Case No.
t
i 855 MDA 2007
v
e 951 MDA 2007
Court
Case Description
Comm of PA v Caterbone Fiorill
Court Venue
SA-0160-06 PA Superior Court
Filing
Date
5/7/2007
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 May 11

Judement
06-00366 PA Superior Court
950 MDA 2007
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 Feb 24

Reconsider IFP Frivelous
06-00366 PA Superior Court
125 MDA 2007
Comm of PA v Caterbone East

Lampeter Judge Farina
CP-36-CR-0002843-06
435 MDA 2007
Comm of PA v Caterbone Dauphin

County Harrisburg Airport Ticket
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
CI-06-03349
Defendants
Officer Fiorill
Judges
Judge Reinaker
6/1/2006
Totaro, Farina, Cullen,etal
Judge Cullen
1/4/2007
Bezzard, East Lampeter
3/9/2007
MDJ Smith, Dauphin Cty
Caterbone v. Lancaster General

Hospital/Dr. Emily Pressley
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
38
248 MDA 2007
Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA 1463 CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court
2/5/2007
39
248 MDA
Reconsideration
Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA 1463 CI-06-02271 PA Superior Court
7/20/2007
40
432 MT 2007
Superior Court Appeal 950 MDA 2007
CI-07-00366
8/16/2007
41
433 MT 2007
CI-07-00366
8/16/2007
418 MT 2007
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
8/8/2007
128 MM 2007

Commonwealth Court
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007 PA
Superior Court
8/8/2007
45
1130 CD 2007
1444 CD 2007
1442 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003

Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-004A
April 26, 2007 ORDER Rosen

July 5 2007 ORDER Cooksey
July 10, 2007 ORDER Rosen
8/2/2007
8/2/2007
45
Case No.
42
Description
Judement
Value
Notes
Description
Value
Notes
Judge Cullen
1565 MDA 2007

37
Appeal
Date
8/30/2007
Judge Farina
Judge Cullen
42
43
44
46
47
48
49
50
51
Criminal District Justice - 27

Overturned
Court Venue
Date
Docket/Brief Schedule
Date
Defendants
MDJ Eckert
Tim Deacon 236 Stone Hill Road, My Cat

Killed,Appeal due on 06/10/05 paid fine/Judicial
Complaint to file /Southern Regional file
harrassment
Filed Fleeing charges on April 10, 2006
MDJ Eckert to Mylin
Change of Venue to Quarryville DJ by Judge

Eckert
Stan Caterbone
Judge Thomas Xavios
April 25th; 10:00 am 1259 North 10th Street,

Reading,PA 19604/610-373-4424
Stan Caterbone
Judge QuarryvilleJudge Eckert
2 Girls Walking fabricated harassment

chargesApril 2, 2006
CV-0000207-05
District Justice
Harrasment; Letter about cat

Buser File Fleeing Arresting Officer

Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
TR-0000245-06
Southern Regional Speeding &

InspectionHearing Jun 9th 9:00 am
7/7/2006 Stan Caterbone
TR-0003020-06
Reading Parking Meter & Inspection
TR-0000085-06
Southern Regional 2 Girls Walking

asked time when burglar in 220 Stone
Hill Went to Store for help
SP2421099
Vineland, NJ 856-691-4111 39:4-97
Stan Caterbone
4/3/2006
Judges
Was never in Vineland, New Jersey
TR-0001010-06
Firorill Careless Driving
Stan Caterbone
53
TR-0001011-06
Firorill Careless Driving to Close
Stan Caterbone
54
TR-0002658-06
NT-0000220-06
Whiteford Insurance Card

Terroristic Threat Evacuate Bld

7/11/2006
4/3/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Eckert to Commins
Whiteford illegal stop said went through stope

sign, but did not.
Wagon Wheel?
CR-0000141-06
DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons
8/8/2006
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Hamilton to Commins
See Notes; Fabricated charges by SRPD
56
57
58
60
61
62
Disorderly Conduct

8/11/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Simms
MDJ Simms
Simms wrong on IFP got mad arrested me

Parking Meter
TR-0002645-06
TR-0004428-06
Comcast v. S Caterbone
Careless Driving; Stop Sign Violation
Meter Violation

4/12/2006
7/7/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Simms
Cable/Internet Past Due-See Illegal Interuption

LCPD Whiteford Lied; did not
Parking Meter
TR-0001517
HIA Parking Violation
5/19/2006
Stan Caterbone
MDJ Smith/Dauphin Cty
5 of 39
$62.50
$247.50 Must file Appeal - All lies; burglary

Driving Violation, was never stopped
or saw any police
A complete lie, took picture, he had

$75.00 matress on top of car
CR-0000385-06
TR-0004428-06
59
$187.50 Appeal No. SA159-2006
A complete lie, Fiorill perjury, off

$287.50 duty
52
55
Must File Appeal, Never received

Notice for Appeal Hearing Sept
$381.00 2005Cat killed, I'm charged
Picking Up Sheryl; No ticket on van; lied
He was on bike, never went through

stop sign, he was the one at the
$381.50 Police Station that did illusion trick
Fabricated
.073 w/ mouth wash/I turned then
they put lights on, wood hatchet in
van
Got mad when he was wrong about
IFP law, Right before Littering
Hearing, Lanc Cop would have been
made fool of
$81.89 S
$997.50 verdict on July 20 2006
$81.89 verdict on June 28 2006
Picking up Sheryl at Harrisburg
International, grounded plane,
Lance;Clinton; Wendell married on
$67.50 Sat night
05/26/2015

Court
Case Description
Court Venue
Filing
Date
6/16/2006
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
Parking Meter
10/16/2006
65
A
c
Case No.
t
i TR-0005057
v TR-0008503-06
e
TR-0008735-06
Parking Meter
66
* TR-0006812-06
Parking Meter
10/25/2006
timeserved
67
TR-0008037-06
Parking Meter
timeserved
68
TR-0008066-06
Parking Meter
timeserved
76.89
69
TR-0007880-06
Parking Meter
timeserved
76.89
70
TR-0008721-06
Parking Meter
10/25/2006
71
TR-0008578-06
Parking Meter
10/16/2006
72
TR-0003557-06
No Parking or Stoping
73
TR-0004428-06
Parking Meter Oct 5 Sentence
5/26/2006
74
TR-0003557-06
Parking Meter
4/28/2006
75
TR-0000598-06
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas-MDJ Roth
Rubbish-Littering Oct 10 sentence
76
TR-0002645-06
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
Careless Driving-Aug 15 Sentence
7/7/2006
75
77
TR-0002646-06
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
Stop Sign
7/7/2006
112
78
TR-0007528-06
MDJ Simms/Wilcox-Bourne Witness
Driving Under Suspension Aug 30
9/13/2006
79
TR-2183-2006
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
Driving Under Suspension Aug 30
9/5/2006
DISMISSED 01/18/200
80
TR-2184-2006
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
Driving w/out Insurance
9/5/2006
DISMISSED 01/18/200
80
81
82 *
83
84
85 *
86 *
87 *
88
2006-214
2006-215
2006-220
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 -
(MDJ William G. Reuter)

MDJ B. Denise Commins)
(MDJ Lm H. Eckert, Jr.)
(MDJ Stuart J. Mylh)
(MDJ Maynard A. Hamilton, Jr.)
Geogelis August
Eckert
89
2007-
Farina,Reinaker,Cullins,Eckert,Commins
No.
63
64
89
Case No.
Case No.
PA Judicial Conduct Review Board
Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas of Pennsylvania
Court Venue
Appeal
Date
Defendants
Date
Defendants
Judges
Date
Defendants
Judges
Description
Value
Notes
1/18/2007
Court Venue
Date
8/11/2006
Burger
92
Appeal Summary Conviction Eckert-Stoltzfus

Ap NT-0000562-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Disorderly Conduct
8/7/2006
Michner
93

Ap NT-0000561-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Obstruct Roadway
8/11/2006
Michner
94
MD-6-2006
Simms
Common Pleas
Cullin
Appeal MD-6Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus
Jan 16-Brief by Commonwealth, Parking Tickets and

Driving Under Suspension
Notes
TR-0008735;TR-0008578;TR-8721;TR0008503;TR-0007528
TR-0002184-06;tr-0002183-06;NT0000569-06;NT-0000561-06;NT0000562-06
Judge Cullin Dismissed 01/09/2006

1/15/2006
96
MD-10-2007
Nunc Pro Tunc
Reinaker DENIED 01/08/07
97
MD-11-2007
TR-3557-06 Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets
98
MD-12-2007
Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets
99
CP-36-SA-00001592006
Nunc Pro Tunc
100
MD-0006-2007
Eckert Change Venue
Reinaker DENIED 01/05/07 MOOT not

recorded until 01/08/2007
101
SA-158-07
Simms NT-0001707-2006
Common Pleas - Summary Conviction

- Harassment
6/4/2007
Simms/Gjurich
Ballentine TR-0002658-2006
Common Pleas - Summary Conviction

- w/o Insurnance
5/30/2007
Ballentine/Whiteford
SA-154-2007
Value
Dismissed June 2006

Ap NT-0000569-2006 jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Harassment
102
Description
Dismissed
Dismissed
MD 51-2007
95
Notes
282.5
91
Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus
Judement
Value
$62.00
325 Roth
90
Change Venue/Continuance Simms Jan23
Description
Parking Meter
87.89
1/7/2007
Date
Judges
MDJ Solomon/Duaphin
6 of 39
05/26/2015

Pro Se Hourly Billing Report
March 28 2007 (Work-In-Progress Not Completed)
Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
3/1/2007 7001
05-2288
CI-06-03401
7002
3/18/2007
05-23059
CP-36-SA00001412005
Line Description
Item Description
01/01/05
Jan 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case Finding of Facts and Research Hours
Data
Billed
02/01/05
Feb 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Meetings & Communications with Chief of Southern
Regional Police Fiorill
02/01/05
Feb 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
03/01/05
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Meetings & Communications with Chief of Southern
Regional Police Fiorill
04/01/05
Apr 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
05/01/05
May 2005 Research Filing of Petition for Bankruptcy, Russell Kraft, Chapter 11 Hours
Nettleton & Fenefrock
Billed
05/01/05
May 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
05/01/05
May 2005 General Hours Billed For May 16 2005 Legal Work Done
On Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al U.S. District Court Civil Litigation
05-2288 Pro Se Civil Case
Hours Billed
05/01/05
May 2005 Prepare all Chapter 11 Filing Submittals for Case 0523059
05/10/05
May 10 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Case 18$2709$$A3 Harassment w/Tim Decker Killing Hours Billed For
of Cat SRPD Humane Legue Witness
Criminal Case
05/16/05
May 16 2005 File for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection in Federal Chapter 11 Hours
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Reading Billed
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
$125.00
$625.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
60
$75.00
$4,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
40
$125.00
$5,000.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
06/01/05
Jun 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
06/01/05
Jun 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

Creditors and Accounts Payables for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Chapter 11 Hours
05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
06/01/05

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
06/21/05
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone

Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's Failure to Chapter 11 Appeal
Timely File Required Documents to
Hours
$125.00
$625.00
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
Line Description
Item Description
07/01/05
Jul 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
07/01/05
Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant Designation of Contents For

Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Fact Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: #
07/01/05
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
$125.00
$625.00
Jul 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
May-89 07/25/05
Jul 25 2005 Appeal Judge Twardowski Order of June 13, 2005

General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Hours Billed For
Case
Civil Appeals
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
08/01/05
Aug 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
08/01/05
Aug 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
09/01/05
Sep 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
09/01/05
Sep 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
09/28/05
Sep 28 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case Notice of Appeal Stolen From Mail, Never
Hours Billed
Appeared For Trial, Judge Allison
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
10/01/05
Oct 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
10/01/05
Oct 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
11/01/05
Nov 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
11/01/05
Nov 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
11/19/05
Nov 19 2005 Letter (dated 11/3/2005) Filed by Debtor Stanley J.

Caterbone addressed to Department of Justice, US Trustee Office - Chapter 11 Hours
RE: Summation on reason to fi
Billed
$125.00
$875.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
CP-36-CR00028432006
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
12/01/05
Dec 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
12/01/05
Dec 2005 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
12/05/05
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Judge Reuter, Bezzard had to

Refile or Dismiss General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case East Lampeter Twp
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
12/15/05
Dec 15 2005Chapter 11 341 Meeting of Creditors in Reading

Bankruptcy Court with Hugh Ward/Joe Adams
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
12/15/05
Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules F & G Filed by Amended Matrix

Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number 20074028, Fee Amount
Chapter 11 Hours
$26.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 12/16/2005)
Billed
$125.00
$375.00
12/16/05
Dec 16 2005 Response dated 12/14/2005 Filed by Stanley J.

Chapter 11 Hours
Caterbone Regarding HEMAP Appeal Hearing Request. (P., Cathy) Billed
$125.00
$375.00
01/01/06
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed For Jan 23 2006 Legal Work
Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al 05-2288 Case Served Civil Litigation
Defendants per Judge Mclaughlin
Hours Billed
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
01/01/06
Jan 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
01/19/06
Jan 19 2006Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone RE: AmendedSchedules and Response to Creditor Status Order
(related document(s)27). (P., Cath
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
$125.00
$1,000.00
01/30/06
Jan 30 2006 Advanced Media Group Income Statements for the the Chapter 11 Hours
year 2005 Filed in Reading Bankruptcy Court
Billed
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
02/01/06
Feb 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
02/01/06
Feb 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
02/08/06
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of Mandamus From Lancaster County

PrisonGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$1,000.00
02/21/06
Feb 21 2005 Hearing Held on 31 Motion for Relief from Stay Filed
by Fulton Bank Represented by SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel).
Matter Taken Under Advisement.
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
03/01/06
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
120
$75.00
$9,000.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
CI-06-03349
CI-05-03403
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
03/01/06
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case Finding of Facts and Court Time Hours
Data
Billed
30
$150.00
$4,500.00
03/01/06
Mar 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
03/17/06
Mar 17 2006 Notice of Appeal - RE: Order dated 2/23/2006

Granting Motion for Relief from Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Chapter 11 Appeal
Hill Road, Filed byFulton Bank ;
Hours
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
03/18/06
May 18 2006 Lancaster County DA Office Refile Charges General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case 4
Charges-Harras Dis Ord,Theft,Harrasment
$125.00
$250.00
03/19/06
Mar 19 2006 Debtor Request for Hearing, and Certificate of Service Chapter 11 Hours
thereto Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
Billed
$125.00
$250.00
03/26/06
Mar 26 2007 File Response to Preliminary Objections to Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas General Hours Billed For Legal
Civil Litigation
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Hours Billed
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
04/01/06
Apr 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
04/01/06
Apr 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
04/04/06
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Prepared Complaint and Email to Don Totaro, Lancaster Civil Litigation
County DA
Hours Billed
$125.00
$500.00
04/06/06
Apr 6 2006 Request for Continuance of Chapter 11 Case Filed by

Stanley J. Caterbone from Lancaster General Hospital
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
$125.00
$250.00
04/10/06
Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint, walked to Courthouse directly after

discharge from Hospital - General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
04/10/06
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v. Lancaster

County Prison, et al from Lancaster General Hopital to Judge
McLaughlin Granted
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$625.00
04/10/06
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v. Lancaster

County Prison, et al from Lancaster General Hopital to Judge
McLaughlin Granted
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$625.00
04/11/06
Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint - General Hours Billed For Legal Work Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
04/11/06
Apr 11 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation
Civil Case Filed Complaint
Hours Billed
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
04/28/06
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint General Hours Billed For Legal

Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
$125.00
$500.00
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
06-1538
CI-06-04939
Line Description
04/28/06
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended Complaint - General Hours Billed For

Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Item Description
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
$125.00
$1,000.00
05/01/06
May 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
05/01/06
May 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
05/15/06
May 15 2006 File Appeal to Automatic Stay Order of Judge Fehling

to Judge Anita Brody General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Hours Billed
On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Criminal Appeal
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
05/15/06
May 15 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Civil Case Certificate of Service Personal Delivery to William
Cambell of Quarryville
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$625.00
05/24/06
May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Application General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$1,000.00
06/01/06
Jun 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
06/01/06
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte Meeting w/Judge McLaughlin

Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05- Civil Litigation
2288 Case
Hours Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
06/01/06

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
06/06/06
Jun 6 2006 Filed Important Notice of Default - General Hours Billed Civil Litigation
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Hours Billed
$125.00
$500.00
06/10/06
Jun 10 2006 Motion for Continuance General Hours Billed For

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
06/14/06
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton Bank's response to plff's motion for

ex parte meeting with Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin,
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
06/15/06
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to Preliminary Objections General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
06/22/06
Jun 22 2006 Debtor's Objection/Answer to United States Trustee's

Motion to Dismiss or Convert Case to Chapter 7 ; Answer and
Chapter 11 Hours
Exhibits Filed by Stanley J. Cate
Billed
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
06/23/06
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt Bomberger, Public Defender

General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
06/25/06

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
TR-0000085--2006
CP-36-CR00031792006
Item Description
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
06/26/06
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma Pauperis Granted General Hours Billed

For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$250.00
06/28/06
Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation General Hours Billed For Legal

Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
06/28/06
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S 28th St. Harrisburg Guilty MDJ

Smith Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
06/29/06
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss Case, or

Conversion of Case to Chapter 7 Filed by United States Trustee (
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$1,050.00
07/01/06
Jul 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
07/01/06
Jul 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
07/05/06
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing General Hours Billed For Legal Work

Done On Pro Se Criminal Case MDJ Hamilton, Fire M. Bomberger, Hours Billed For
Public Defender, MDJ Hamilton Guilty
Criminal Case
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
07/14/06
Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Denied by
Civil Litigation
Georgelis
Hours Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
CP-36-CR00001602006
07/14/06
Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ Hamilton General Hours Billed For Legal Hours Billed For
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Fines $367.50
Criminal Case
$125.00
$1,000.00
CI-06-07188
07/25/06
Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation
Civil Case Filed Complaint with Advanced Media Group
Hours Billed
$125.00
$1,000.00
07/25/06
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior Court of Pennsylvania General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Hours Billed For

Civil Appeals
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
07/25/06
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary Appeal to Court of Common

PleasGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Appeal Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
07/26/06
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Lanaster County Court of

Common PleasTime For Court Appearance and Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
08/01/06
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
CI-06-07330
08/01/06
Aug 1 2006 Complaint & Informa Pauperis Filed with Advanced

Media Group - General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Civil Case, IFP Granted by Georgeli
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
CP-36-SA00000282007
08/01/06
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office Correspondence & Complaint to

SRPDTime For Court Appearance and Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
08/01/06
2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se

Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking Meter Violation MDJ
Simms
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
CI-06-06658
1462-MDA-2006
3/17/2007
Line Description
No. of
TR-0003557-2006

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
TR-0004428-2006
CI-06-07376
CI-06-08490
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
08/01/06
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking Meter Violation MDJ
Simms
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
08/01/06
Aug 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster County

Data
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
08/01/06
Aug 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
08/02/06
Aug 2 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation
Civil Case Filed Complaint
Hours Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
08/02/06
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of Particulars Discovery General Hours Hours Billed For
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
08/09/06
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Time For Court

Appearance and Litigation Shawn Long Appeared at Defendants
Table before Court, walked out
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
08/10/06
10 Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Chapter 11 Hours
Chapter 11 Case Transfered to Chapter 11 Case by PP&L
Billed
$125.00
$125.00
08/15/06
Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ Commins Robert M. Fedor General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case 2 Girls Hours Billed For
Walking Guilty Fine $315.66
Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
08/18/06
Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to Fulton Bank's motion to establish

deadline for plff to file amended complaint in accordance with the
Court's order of 6/19/06,
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
08/24/06
Aug 24 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation
Civil Case Filed Default Notice
Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
08/24/06
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of Default Filed - General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
08/25/06
Aug 25 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Civil Litigation
Case Refiled In Forma Pauperis Granted by Cullen
Hours Billed
$125.00
$625.00
09/01/06
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Filed General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP Granted
Judge Ashworth
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
09/01/06
Sep 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
09/01/06
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
$125.00
$1,000.00
09/01/06
2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation For Parking Meter Court Time Hours
Violation
Billed
$150.00
$450.00
09/05/06
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed For
Civil Appeal Case Filed Appeal to Superior Court of Pennsylvania Civil Appeals
$125.00
$1,000.00
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
CI-06-08742
06-cv-5138
Item Description
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
09/05/06
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal
Case Transfered from Superior Court to Commonwealth Court of
Hours Billed For
Common Pleas
Civil Appeals
$125.00
$250.00
09/11/06
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by
Judge Reinaker
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$1,000.00
09/14/06
Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma Pauperis Application Filed &

Approved by Judge Joseph Madenspacher
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$500.00
09/14/06
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Judge AllisonTime For Court

Appearance and Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
09/27/06
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to Preliminary Objections - General Hours Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$875.00
10/01/06
Oct 2006Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Oct 3 2006 Filed Appeal General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Jun-54 10/03/06
3/16/2007
Line Description
No. of
Hours Billed For

Civil Appeals
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
10/05/06
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation MDJ Simms Court Time Hours
Billed
$150.00
$450.00
10/08/06
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter For Payment of Fine & Costs
Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$375.00
10/12/06
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued Judge Allison

Case $75$3733$$A M2
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
10/20/06
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge Farina Time For Court
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
10/23/06
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of Arbitration - General Hours Billed

For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$625.00
10/30/06
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended Complaint from Bausman Post Office,

Case
Civil Appeals
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
10/30/06
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to MDJ Eckert Picked Up by

Constables General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
11/01/06
Nov 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Appeal Case Harbeas Corpus filed from Lancaster County
Prison on November 17, 2006
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
11/01/06
Nov 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Hours Billed For

Civil Appeals

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
11/06/06
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued Judge Allison

Case From Lanc Co Prison
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
11/07/06
Nov 7 2006 Filed for Continuance from Lancaster County Prison

General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
11/07/06
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60 Day Continuance - General Hours

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
11/14/06
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus to U.S. District Court of Eastern

District of PA General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case Lanc Pri
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$875.00
11/14/06
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for Continuance From Lancaster County

PrisonJudge Cullen Denied General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
11/22/06
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial Judge Farina
(Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case Janice Longer Appo
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
11/27/06
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge FarinaTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation From Lancaster County Prison
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
12/01/06
Dec 2006 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
12/01/06
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals & Motions General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case From Lancaster
Hours Billed
County Prison
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$750.00
12/01/06
Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From Lancaster County Prison Research Hours
Law Library
Billed
$75.00
$375.00
12/01/06
Dec 2006 Lancaster County Prison Law Library Research Billed For Research Hours
Case
Billed
$75.00
$375.00
12/04/06
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina Sent to 1250 Fremont & 220 Stone
Hill Rd to get files Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
Dismiss Harassment, Change to Summa
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$1,050.00
12/05/06
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harrasment & Disorderly Conduct, Not Guilty Thef of Service
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
12/05/06
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous Granted Motion For Continuance Court Time Hours
Billed
$150.00
$600.00
12/08/06
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
12/14/06
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Continued Judge Ashworth

(Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case From Lanc Co Prison
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
Item Description
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
12/15/06
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal Trial Judge Perezous Found

Guilty ?? April 2 Day of Daylight Person Broke Into 220 Stone Hill
Road, Mike on Cell Phone, Kennet SPoli
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
12/22/06
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Eckert From

Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$750.00
12/22/06
Dec 22 2006 Motion for Transcripts Filed from Lancaster County

Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
12/22/06
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Commins From

Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$750.00
12/28/06
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From Lancaster County Research Hours
Prison Law Library
Billed
$75.00
01/01/07
Jan 2007 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
01/01/07
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith Re Payment of Fines General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
01/04/07
Jan 4 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court Filed at

Lancaster County Clerk of CoGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
01/04/07
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to Superior Court Case No. MDA 125
Appeal Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
01/04/07
Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for Continuance/Change Venue General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Moved From Eckert to Stotlzfus
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$375.00
01/05/07
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
01/05/07
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
01/05/07
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File In Forma Pauperis for MDJ

Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
CP-36-CR00000122007
01/05/07
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
CP-36-MD00000102007
01/09/07
Jan 09 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal Case Filed Nunc Pro Tunc, Denied by Reainaker Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
CP-36-MD00000062007
3/22/2007
Line Description
No. of
MDA 125-2006
CP-36-CR00000102007
CP-36-CR00000112007
CP-36-CR00000112007
1116
$525.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
3/20/2007
CP-36-CR00000512007
CP-36-CR00000552006
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
01/09/07
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for Change of Venue Deinied Judge

Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$375.00
01/11/07
Jan 11 2007 Motion for Continance Filed Denied Judge Reinaker

Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
01/11/07
Jan 11 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted General Hours Hours Billed
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
01/12/07
Jan 12 2007 File Change of Venue/ Continuance MDEckert

Citations Denied by Judge Cullen General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
01/17/07
Jan 17 2007 Motion for Reconsideration Filed Denied Judge

Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
01/18/07
Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ StoltzfusTime For Court Appearance and

Litigation Guilty Harr, Dis Con, Obs, Dismiss DUSus Fin Responsi
Fine $954 Joe Caterbone
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$900.00
01/19/07
Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis General

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$250.00
01/19/07
Jan 19 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal Case Refiled, Denied Again
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
01/25/07
Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo Appeal to Lancaster County Court

of Common Pleas General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$625.00
01/25/07
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application For Leave Nunc Pro TuncGeneral

Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
01/26/07
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court Reporters Office to Get Electronic

Version of Transcript & ReGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
01/26/07
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted Judge

Perezous General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
02/01/07
Feb 2007 Administration, Reporting and Communication with

05-23059
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
02/07/07
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court Collections Office

for Payment of Fines and Costs and Remove Payment Due
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
02/12/07
Feb 12 2997 Filed Concise Statement of Matters Complainted on

Appeal General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
82
$500.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
MDA 435-2007
3/28/2007
248 MAL 2007
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
02/15/07
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma Pauperis In Dauphin County Court of

Common Pleas Granted General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
02/23/07
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to Lancaster County Bar v. Janice

Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
02/23/07
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court Collections to

Have Payment Due Removed General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
02/25/07
Fines $442.00 Paid General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
02/26/07
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
02/28/07
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to Longer Petition to Withdraw From

Case General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
03/01/07
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed For
Criminal Case Meeting with Janice Longer To Prepare
Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
03/04/07
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen Continued Case to April Court Hours Billed For
ScheduleTime For Court Appearance and Litigation
Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
03/04/07
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court Diciplinary Complaint v. Janice

Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
03/07/07
Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended Complaint - General Hours Billed For

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$875.00
03/08/07
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court in Dauphin

County Court MDA 435-2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
03/22/07
Mar 22 2007 Research & Review Pa Consolodated Statutes

Annotated at Law Library General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$375.00
03/25/07
Mar 25 2007 Filed Docketing Statement to Superior Court of

Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
03/26/07
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Review Motion to Dismiss

QuashGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Criminal Case
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
$125.00
$250.00
03/27/07
Mar 27 2007 File Response to Fulton Bank Motion to Dismiss Case

Case
Civil Appeals
$125.00
$375.00
03/27/07
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with Lancaster County Clerk of Courts

Review & Correct Index of RecorGeneral Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
$125.00
$375.00
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
48
$750.00

Invoice
Invoice
Case
Date
Date
No.
Number
Of Billing
39169
248 MAL 2007
03/27/07
Line Description
Item Description
Mar 27 2007 File Response to Fulton Bank Motion to Dismiss Case

Case
Civil Appeals
No. of
Hourly
Debit
Credit
Hours
Rate
Amount
Amount
$125.00
Fulton Bank v Caterbone, Stan
06-cv-4734
$375.00
375
03/16/07
Mar 16 2007 Letter to U.S. Senator Arlen Specter Regarding

Obstruciton of Justice General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
03/12/07
Mar 12 2007 Meet Lisa Owings staffer on Judiciary Comitte from

Senator Specter at Chamber Building General Hours Billed For
Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
03/13/07
Mar 13 2007 Letter to Lisa Owings of Senator Specter Office

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
03/19/07

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
03/20/07

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
03/24/07
Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator Specter General Hours Billed For

Civil Litigation
Hours Billed
$125.00
Federal False Claims Act

Totals
Hours Billed
2,114.00
Weeks of Billing
March Hours
57
$250.00
1625
52.85
57
$225,550.00
Date
Invoice No Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Caterbone
v. Lanc Co
Prison et
AMG
Chapter
11
Bankruptc
y
Federal
Habeau
Corpus
Caterbone
v. Penn
DOT
Caterbone
v.
Caterbone
,Michael
Caterbone
v. Penn
DOT
Caterbone
v. PP&L
Electric
Unit Price Debit AmntCredit Amnt
77,375.00
47,800.00
1,875.00
2,250.00
1,500.00
3,750.00
1,125.00
Caterbone
v.
Southern
Regional
12,100.00
Caterbone
v.
Millersville
Poli
4,375.00
Caterbone
v.
Benjamin
Roda
1,500.00
Caterbone
v.
Harleysvill
e et
5,500.00
Caterbone
v.
Grassell,
Thomas
2,375.00
Caterbone
v.
Lancaster
General
4,125.00
Caterbone
v.
Pflumm,Mi
ke et al
1,000.00
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
1,075.00
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
1,075.00
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
1,875.00
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
500.00
Court
Time
Hours
Billed
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
0.1
150
15
8,990.00
11,650.00
6,275.00
1,000.00
3,600.00
2,875.00
250.00
500
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Chapter
11
Dismissal
Appeal
Fulton
Auto Stay
Appeal
Chapter
11 Amend
Dismissal
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v. S.
Caterbone
Common
of PA v S.
Caterbone
Fulton
Bank v
Caterbone
, Stan
Total
500
500
500
250
3,125.00
2,500.00
3,125.00
2,625.00
3,250.00
500
375
###
###

Court Case Billing Summary Report
05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
3/1/2007
Invoice
No.
7001
Case
Number
05-cv-2288
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Jan 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Billed
Prison, et al U.S. District Court 052288 Case Finding of Facts and Data
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
Feb 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
Mar 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
Apr 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
May 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
60
$75.00
$4,500.00
May 2005 General Hours Billed For

May 16 2005 Legal Work Done On
Prison, et al U.S. District Court 052288 Pro Se Civil Case
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jun 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Jul 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Aug 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Sep 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Oct 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Nov 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Civil Litigation Hours

Billed

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Dec 2005 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed For

Jan 23 2006 Legal Work Caterbone Civil Litigation Hours
v. Lancaster County Prison, et al 05- Billed
2288 Case Served Defendants per
Judge Mclaughlin
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
Feb 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
Mar 2006 Research Billed for

Court Time Hours
Billed
30
$150.00
$4,500.00
Apr 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
$125.00
$625.00
May 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
Jun 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte

Meeting w/Judge McLaughlin
Prison, et al U.S. District Court 052288 Case
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton Bank's

response to plff's motion for ex parte Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
meeting with Honorable Mary A.
McLaughlin,
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jul 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
Aug 2006 Research Billed for

Research Hours
Billed
20
$75.00
$1,500.00

Billed

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to Fulton
Bank's motion to establish deadline
for plff to file amended complaint in
accordance with the Court's order of
6/19/06,
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
15
$125.00
$125.00
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et
05-23059
Credit
Amount

Billed
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
7002
Debit
Amount
$1,875.00
$625.00
$77,375.00
May 2005 Research Filing of Petition Chapter 11 Hours

for Bankruptcy, Russell Kraft,
Billed
Nettleton & Fenefrock
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
May 16 2005 File for Chapter 11

Bankruptcy Protection in Federal
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
$125.00
$625.00
40
$125.00
$5,000.00
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal Filed

Chapter 11 Appeal
by Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding
Hours
6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Case for
Debtor's Failure to Timely File
Required Documents to
$125.00
$625.00
Jun 2005 Administration, Reporting

and Communication with Creditors
and Accounts Payables for Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant

Designation of Contents For Inclusion Chapter 11 Hours
in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Billed
Fact Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: #
$125.00
$625.00
Jul 2005 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Aug 2005 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Sep 2005 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Oct 2005 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Nov 2005 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
May 2005 Prepare all Chapter 11

Filing Submittals for Case 05-23059
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Nov 19 2005 Letter (dated 11/3/2005)

Chapter 11 Hours
Filed by Debtor Stanley J. Caterbone
Billed
addressed to Department of Justice,
US Trustee Office - RE: Summation
on reason to fi
$125.00
$875.00
Dec 2005 Administration, Reporting

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Dec 15 2005Chapter 11 341 Meeting Court Time Hours

Billed
of Creditors in Reading Bankruptcy
Court with Hugh Ward/Joe Adams
$150.00
$750.00
Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules F

Chapter 11 Hours
& G Filed by Amended Matrix Stanley
Billed
J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number
20074028, Fee Amount $26.00. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 12/16/2005)
$125.00
$375.00
Dec 16 2005 Response dated

Chapter 11 Hours
12/14/2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Billed
Caterbone Regarding HEMAP Appeal
Hearing Request. (P., Cathy)
$125.00
$375.00
Jan 2006 Administration, Reporting

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jan 19 2006Certificate of Service

Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone - RE: Chapter 11 Hours
AmendedSchedules and Response to Billed
Creditor Status Order (related
document(s)27). (P., Cath
$125.00
$1,000.00
Jan 30 2006 Advanced Media Group

Income Statements for the the year Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
2005 Filed in Reading Bankruptcy
Court
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
Feb 2006 Administration, Reporting

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Feb 21 2005 Hearing Held on 31

Motion for Relief from Stay Filed by Court Time Hours
Fulton Bank Represented by SHAWN Billed
M. LONG (Counsel). Matter Taken
Under Advisement.
$150.00
$750.00
Mar 2006 Administration, Reporting

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Mar 17 2006 Notice of Appeal - RE:

Order dated 2/23/2006 Granting
Chapter 11 Appeal
Motion for Relief from Stay Regarding Hours
Property 220 Stone Hill Road, Filed
byFulton Bank ;

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Chapter 11 Hours
Mar 19 2006 Debtor Request for
Billed
Hearing, and Certificate of Service
thereto Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
$125.00
$250.00
Apr 2006 Administration, Reporting

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Apr 6 2006 Request for Continuance

of Chapter 11 Case Filed by Stanley Chapter 11 Hours
J. Caterbone from Lancaster General Billed
Hospital
$125.00
$250.00
May 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jun 22 2006 Debtor's

Chapter 11 Hours
Objection/Answer to United States
Billed
Trustee's Motion to Dismiss or
Convert Case to Chapter 7 ; Answer
and Exhibits Filed by Stanley J. Cate
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE:

Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
Filed by United States Trustee (
$150.00
$1,050.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Court Time Hours

Billed
Jul 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Aug 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Sep 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Oct 2006Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Nov 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Dec 2006 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
Jan 2007 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Feb 2007 Administration, Reporting

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed

Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
3/16/2007
06-cv-5138
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
Hours Billed For Civil

Appeals
15
$125.00
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For

Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Case

Billed
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed For

Case

Billed
10
$125.00
$125.00
Aug 2 2006 General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Case Filed Complaint
10
$125.00
Aug 24 2006 General Hours Billed

For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Billed
Case Filed Default Notice
$125.00
$1,000.00
$1,250.00
$250.00
$1,500.00
Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Case Filed Complaint & In Forma
Pauperis Denied by Georgelis
15
$125.00
$1,875.00

Case Refiled In Forma Pauperis
Granted by Cullen
$125.00
$625.00
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed For

Appeal Case Filed Appeal to Superior Appeals
Court of Pennsylvania
$125.00
$1,000.00
General Hours Billed For Legal Work

Transfered from Superior Court to
Appeals
Commonwealth Court of Common
Pleas
$125.00

Billed
Caterbone v. Penn DOT
CI-06-07188
$1,250.00
$2,250.00
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael
CI-06-06658
$1,875.00
$1,875.00
Caterbone v. Penn DOT
CI-06-07376
$1,250.00
$47,800.00
Federal Habeau Corpus
1462-MDA-2006
Credit
Amount
10
AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Nov 2006 General Hours Billed For
Appeal Case Harbeas Corpus filed
from Lancaster County Prison on
November 17, 2006
Debit
Amount
Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed For

Case Filed Complaint with Advanced Billed
Media Group
$250.00
$3,750.00
$125.00
$1,000.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
10 Aug 2006 General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Chapter 11 Case Transfered to
Chapter 11 Case by PP&L
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
$125.00
$125.00
$1,125.00
Feb 2005 General Hours Billed For

Case Meetings & Communications
with Chief of Southern Regional
Police Fiorill

Billed
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed For

Case Meetings & Communications
with Chief of Southern Regional
Police Fiorill

Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Case Prepared Complaint and Email
to Don Totaro, Lancaster County DA
$125.00
$500.00
Apr 11 2006 General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Case Filed Complaint
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint

General Hours Billed For Legal Work Billed
$125.00
$500.00
May 15 2006 General Hours Billed

For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Civil Litigation Hours
Case Certificate of Service Personal Billed
Delivery to William Cambell of
Quarryville
$125.00
$625.00
Jun 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Civil Litigation Hours

$125.00
$375.00
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to

Preliminary Objections General Hours Civil Litigation Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Billed
Se Civil Case
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior

Court of Pennsylvania General Hours Hours Billed For Civil
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Appeals
Se Civil Appeal Case
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas Time For Court
Court Time Hours
Appearance and Litigation Shawn
Billed
Long Appeared at Defendants Table
before Court, walked out
$150.00
$600.00
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended

Complaint from Bausman Post
Office, General Hours Billed For
Appeal Case
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$125.00

Appeals
Nov 7 2006 Filed for Continuance

from Lancaster County Prison
Caterbone v. Southern Regional
CI-06-08490
Credit
Amount
Chapter 11 Hours
Billed
Caterbone v. PP&L Electric
CI-06-03401
Debit
Amount
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In Forma

Pauperis Filed General Hours Billed Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Case IFP Granted Judge Ashworth
$250.00
$12,100.00
15
$125.00
$1,875.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli
CI-06-08742
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint & In

Forma Pauperis General Hours Billed Billed
Case IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
$125.00
Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma

Pauperis Application Filed &
Approved by Judge Joseph
Madenspacher
$125.00
Aug 1 2006 Complaint & Informa

Pauperis Filed with Advanced Media Civil Litigation Hours
Group - General Hours Billed For
Billed
Case, IFP Granted by Georgeli
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of

Default Filed - General Hours Billed Civil Litigation Hours
Case
$125.00
$375.00
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to

Preliminary Objections - General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case
$125.00
$875.00
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of

Arbitration - General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Case
$125.00
$625.00
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60 Day

Continuance - General Hours Billed Civil Litigation Hours
Case
$125.00
$250.00
Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended

Complaint - General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Case
$125.00

Billed
Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint Civil Litigation Hours

15
$125.00
Jun 6 2006 Filed Important Notice of

Default - General Hours Billed For
Billed
Case
$125.00
25
$125.00
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended

Complaint - General Hours Billed For Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
Case
$125.00
Caterbone v. Pflumm,Mike et al
$1,875.00
$500.00
$2,375.00
Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint, walked

to Courthouse directly after discharge Civil Litigation Hours
from Hospital - General Hours Billed Billed
Case
May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & In

Forma Pauperis Application - General Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
On Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by
Judge Reinaker
$875.00
$5,500.00
Caterbone v. Lancaster General
CI-06-04939
$500.00
$1,500.00
Caterbone v. Grassell, Thomas
CI-06-03349
$1,000.00

Billed
Caterbone v. Harleysville et
CI-05-03403
Credit
Amount
$1,875.00
Caterbone v. Benjamin Roda
CI-06-07330
Debit
Amount
$3,125.00
$1,000.00
$4,125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
3/17/2007
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
TR-0003557-2006
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Hours Billed For

Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Criminal Case
Downtown Lancaster Parking Meter
Violation MDJ Simms
$125.00
2006 Time For Court Appearance

and Litigation For Parking Meter
Violation
$150.00
Court Time Hours

Billed
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
TR-0004428-2006
$125.00
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court

Appearance and Litigation MDJ
Simms Parking Meter Violation
$150.00
Court Time Hours

Billed
3/18/2007
Credit
Amount
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00

Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Criminal Case
Case Downtown Lancaster Parking
Meter Violation MDJ Simms
May 10 2005 General Hours Billed

Criminal Case 18$2709$$A3
Harassment w/Tim Decker Killing of
CP-36-SA0000141-2005 Cat SRPD Humane Legue Witness
Debit
Amount
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00
Hours Billed For

Criminal Case
Sep 28 2005 General Hours Billed

Criminal Appeal Case Notice of
Appeal Stolen From Mail, Never
Appeared For Trial, Judge Allison
Hours Billed Criminal

Appeal
Fines $442.00 Paid General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case

Appeal
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$1,875.00
Jan 09 2007 General Hours Billed For

Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
Appeal Case Filed Nunc Pro Tunc,
CP-36-MD0000010-2007 Denied by Reainaker
$125.00
Jan 19 2007 General Hours Billed For Hours Billed Criminal

Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Appeal Case Refiled, Denied Again
$125.00
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing General
Hours Billed For
On Pro Se Criminal Case MDJ
Criminal Case
Hamilton, Fire M. Bomberger, Public
CP-36-CR0003179-2006 Defender, MDJ Hamilton Guilty
$250.00
$250.00
$500.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference

Case Continued Judge Allison
Court Time Hours
$75$3733$$A M2
$150.00
$600.00
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference

Case Continued Judge Allison
Court Time Hours
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From
Lanc Co Prison
$150.00
$600.00
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List

Continued Judge Ashworth (Cullen) Court Time Hours
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From
Lanc Co Prison
$150.00
$600.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List

Scheduled for Trial Judge Farina
Court Time Hours
(Cullen) General Hours Billed For
Billed
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case Janice Longer Appo
$150.00
$600.00
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to

Lancaster County Bar v. Janice
Hours Billed For
Longer General Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Case
$125.00
$625.00
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List

Scheduled for Trial General Hours
Se Criminal Case
$150.00
$600.00
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to

Hours Billed For
Longer Petition to Withdraw From
Criminal Case
Case General Hours Billed For Legal
$125.00
$750.00
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed For

Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Hours Billed For
Case Meeting with Janice Longer To Criminal Case
Prepare
$125.00
$625.00
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen

Hours Billed For
Continued Case to April Court
ScheduleTime For Court Appearance Criminal Case
and Litigation
$125.00
$625.00
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court

Diciplinary Complaint v. Janice
Hours Billed For
Longer General Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Case
$125.00
$625.00
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen

Court Time Hours
Continued Case to April Court
ScheduleTime For Court Appearance Billed
and Litigation
$150.00
Time For Court Appearance and

Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
$750.00
$9,100.00
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing

Hours Billed For
Judge Reuter, Bezzard had to Refile
Criminal Case
or Dismiss General Hours Billed For
CP-36-CR0002843-2006 Case East Lampeter Twp
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
May 18 2006 Lancaster County DA

Hours Billed For
Office Refile Charges General Hours
Criminal Case
Se Criminal Case 4 Charges-Harras
Dis Ord,Theft,Harrasment
$125.00
$250.00
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt

Hours Billed For
Bomberger, Public Defender General Criminal Case
On Pro Se Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment

Lanaster County Court of Common
PleasTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
$150.00
$600.00

Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
Court Time Hours

Billed

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma Pauperis

Hours Billed For
Granted General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Criminal Case
Case
$125.00
$250.00
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of

Particulars Discovery General Hours Hours Billed For
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Criminal Case
Se Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference

Judge AllisonTime For Court
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$600.00
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List

Judge Farina Time For Court
Court Time Hours

Billed
$150.00
$750.00
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial List

Judge FarinaTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation From
Lancaster County Prison
Court Time Hours

Billed
5
$150.00
$750.00
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed For Research Hours

Case From Lancaster County Prison Billed
Law Library
$75.00
$525.00
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina Sent

to 1250 Fremont & 220 Stone Hill Rd Court Time Hours
to get files Time For Court
Billed
Appearance and Litigation Dismiss
Harassment, Change to Summa
$150.00
$1,050.00
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court

Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harrasment & Disorderly Conduct,
Not Guilty Thef of Service
$150.00
$750.00
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals & Motions

General Hours Billed For Legal Work Appeal
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case From Lancaster County Prison
$125.00
$750.00
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to

Superior Court Case No. MDA 125
Case
$125.00
$500.00
Jan 11 2007 Motion for Continuance

Granted General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Appeal Case
$125.00
$375.00
Feb 11 2007 Statement of Matters

Complained Filed to Superior Court Hours Billed Criminal
Case
$125.00
$875.00
Mar 1 2007 File Superior Court

Docket Record General Hours Billed Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
Mar 15 2007 Review Superior Court

Index of Record General Hours Billed Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed Criminal

Appeal
Case
$125.00
Court Time Hours

Billed
$375.00
$13,025.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office

Correspondence & Complaint to
SRPDTime For Court Appearance
CP-36-SA0000028-2007 and Litigation
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
Court Time Hours

Billed
10
$150.00
$1,500.00
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to MDJ Hours Billed For

Eckert Picked Up by Constables
Criminal Case
$125.00
$625.00
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus to

U.S. District Court of Eastern District Hours Billed Criminal
of PA General Hours Billed For Legal Appeal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case Lanc Pri
$125.00
$875.00
Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case

From Lancaster County Prison Law
Library
$75.00
$375.00
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of Mandamus Hours Billed For

From Lancaster County
Criminal Case
PrisonGeneral Hours Billed For Legal
$125.00
$1,000.00
Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for

Hours Billed For
Continuance/Change Venue General
Criminal Case
On Pro Se Criminal Case Moved
From Eckert to Stotlzfus
$125.00
$375.00
Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ StoltzfusTime

Court Time Hours
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Billed
Guilty Harr, Dis Con, Obs, Dismiss
DUSus Fin Responsi Fine $954 Joe
Caterbone
$150.00
$900.00
Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo

Appeal to Lancaster County Court of Hours Billed Criminal
Common Pleas General Hours Billed Appeal
$125.00
Research Hours
Billed
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ Commins
Robert M. Fedor General Hours Billed Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Criminal Case 2 Girls Walking Guilty
Fine $315.66
$125.00
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal Trial

Judge Perezous Found Guilty ?? April Hours Billed Criminal
2 Day of Daylight Person Broke Into Appeal
220 Stone Hill Road, Mike on Cell
Phone, Kennet SPoli
$125.00
Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ Hamilton
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed For
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Fines Criminal Case
CP-36-CR0000160-2006 $367.50
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary
Appeal to Court of Common
PleasGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Appeal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Appeal Case
$625.00
$6,275.00
$625.00
$375.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$500.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
Credit
Amount
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for

Continuance From Lancaster County
Appeal
PrisonJudge Cullen Denied General
$125.00
$375.00
Dec 2006 Lancaster County Prison

Law Library Research Billed For
Case
Research Hours
Billed
$75.00
$375.00
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous

Granted Motion For Continuance
Litigation
Court Time Hours

Billed
4
$150.00
$600.00
Dec 22 2006 Motion for Transcripts

Filed from Lancaster County Prison Hours Billed Criminal
Case
$125.00
$250.00
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For

Continuance Granted Judge
Perezous General Hours Billed For
Appeal
Appeal Case
$125.00
$500.00
$3,600.00
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus

v. MDJ Eckert From Lancaster
Hours Billed For
County Prison General Hours Billed Criminal Case
CP-36-MD0000006-2007 Criminal Case
$125.00
$750.00
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus

v. MDJ Commins From Lancaster
Hours Billed For
County Prison General Hours Billed Criminal Case
Criminal Case
$125.00
$750.00
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for Change Hours Billed For

of Venue Deinied Judge Reinaker
Criminal Case
$125.00
$375.00
Jan 11 2007 Motion for Continance

Hours Billed For
Filed Denied Judge Reinaker General Criminal Case
On Pro Se Criminal Case
$125.00
$500.00
Jan 17 2007 Motion for

Reconsideration Filed Denied Judge Hours Billed For
Reinaker General Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Case
$125.00
$125.00
Jan 12 2007 File Change of Venue/
Continuance MDEckert Citations
Denied by Judge Cullen General
CP-36-CR0000051-2007 On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
$500.00
$2,875.00
Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to Proceed Hours Billed For

In Forma Pauperis General Hours
Criminal Case
CP-36-CR0000055-2006 Se Criminal Case
3/20/2007
Debit
Amount
$250.00
$250.00

Appeal
4
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00

05/26/2015
Invoice
Date
Invoice
No.
Case
Number
Line Description
Item Description
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File

Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ Simms
Citations General Hours Billed For
Appeal
CP-36-CR0000012-2007 Appeal Case
No. of
Hours
Hourly
Rate
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
Jul 25 2005 Appeal Judge
Twardowski Order of June 13, 2005 Appeals
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
$3,125.00
Hours Billed
Criminal Appeal
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00

Appeals
25
Chapter 11 Amend Dismissal

Total
$250.00
$250.00
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal
06-4154
$500.00
$500.00

In Forma Pauperis for MDJ Simms
Appeal
Oct 3 2006 Filed Appeal General

On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
$500.00
$500.00

Appeal
06-1538
$500.00
$125.00
May 15 2006 File Appeal to

Automatic Stay Order of Judge
Fehling to Judge Anita Brody General
Credit
Amount
$500.00

Appeal
06-3689
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$3,125.00
$3,125.00
Hours Billed
Weeks of Billing
2036
50.9
$215,800.00
Diary of Mental Duress

Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,
I started to log incidents of mental duress in December of 1997 after the incidents
became consistent and demonstrated not be random acts of mere occurrences. This
behavior and malicious treatment was an extreme divergence from the previous 45
months of my tenure and a polarization of my relationships with all employees involved,
including Mr. David Pflumm.
Ms. Susan Bare (Office Manager, Reporting Directly To Me)
In December, her attitude became especially hostile toward me, upon many occasions
challenging my computer knowledge when in fact she has limited experience. She had
continued to persist in wanting to change procedures, which I had repeatedly told her that
systems are reviewed at the end of the fiscal year, and any necessary changes would only
be made during the off-season, as in previous years. She had continued to challenge my
authority, which was out-of -character, and not consistent with her job description. She
had often become upset and snippy when I would not go out and get her lunch, which
was not in my job description.
Mr. James Leonards, (Asphalt Paving Supervisor)
In the week preceding Christmas vacation, Mr. Leonards had requested that I submit a
form to Wholsen Contractors, which was incidental to any contracts. The form requested
banking accounts, which I had refused to answer. I would not release the corporate
confidential banking information to a General Contractor of whom we were at credit risk
for collecting payments for services rendered, not the other way around. Mr. Leonards
continued to harass me about the document, and kept waiving the document in front of
my face. He continued, and I told him to have Wholsen call me. I had counted five
incidents regarding this document, which I never submitted. This information was
immaterial to any negotiations with Wholsen, and was intended only as a means of
mental duress.
Mr. Leonards had shown interest in learning estimating software on the computer. He
persistently requested the opportunity, and I had suggested that he evaluate competing
software before any final decisions were made. He had on his own, obtained a
demonstration of software, which he evaluated. It was not what we required, and before
Christmas, I had procured another demonstration disc for his evaluation. He promised to
evaluate that software over the Christmas vacation. Mr. Leonards kept giving me
excuses, and was never evaluated., merely to inflict mental duress.
On many occasions Mr. Leonards insisted on challenging my computer knowledge with
incidental technical questions, knowing that I was becoming annoyed. Mr. Leonards
only began working on a computer at home, within the past several months.
On January 15th, I went out to start my car, and Mr. Leonards and Mr. Ralph Carruthers
from the lobby door, made gestures at me thinking that I was leaving, when in fact I was
1
merely warming up my car. When I returned to the lobby, Mr. Leonards and Mr.
Carruthers had disappeared.
On or about February 24th, upon logging into my AOL account, a Buddy List message
from Mr. James Leonards appeared on my computer screen that said Stan is that you?.
The only way that I am able to receive Buddy List messages is to sign up for the
service, of which I had never done, which means that Mr. Leonards must have illegally
accessed my account and signed my account up for the service. The evening before, a
neighbor saw me looking for my cats with a spot light, and yelled Stan is that you?.
This is certainly a clear example of mental duress, among other electronic privacy
violations.
Mr. John Brown, (Truck Driver)
On January 9th, Mr. John Brown was receiving his pay check and made the following
remark Stan, why didnt you go to Cancun with Dave, you look like one of those
Mexicans.
LN Dockey (Office Assistant, part-time)
Consistently called my car phone upon leaving the office to ask where I was going, and
when I was coming back, which was none of her business. She reported to me, I did not
report to her. She knew that this annoyed me, and was out-of-character and inconsistent
with prior behavior.
Mr. Brian Langsett (Subcontractor)
Mr. Brian Langsett continued to make calls to my home, and during the week of February
20th, screamed and yelled into my voice mail, which resulted in my changing my line to a
private phone line. Mr. Langsett consistently left messages on my voice mail, knowing
that I was not going to answer them back.
Mr. Ralph Carruthers (General Manager)
On January 22nd, Mr. Ralph Carruthers entered my office and requested that I redo a pay
application for the Lancaster Township Park Avenue project that I had done. I informed
him that I had nothing to do with that pay application because I was on vacation. He
stormed out of my office, mad that I wouldnt redo the pay application and telling me
that I had done it. Immediately following his departure, Mr. David Pflumm stormed into
my office and got inches away from my face and said Do you and Ralph have a
problem, what is your problem? I nervously and quite upset said, Dave, I didnt
prepare that pay application, I was on vacation. Mr. Pflumm replied, Yes you did. I
immediately said, Dave, mental duress is a serious matter, you dont mess with
someones mind, like that you just dont play with someones mind like this., I was on
vacation Mr. Pflumm went on to say that I did do the pay application. I asked him Do
you have a problem with me?. He replied no.
I later went to the file and retrieved the original pay application for Lancaster Townships
Park Avenue. It was prepared by Mr. David Pflumm with his handwriting. I later
showed it to him and he said nothing. THIS IS MENTAL DURESS.
Mr. David Pflumm (President, Owner, Best Friend)

See Above.
In August of 1997, I was responsible for the formulation, presentation, and collection of a
Change Order for the removal of rock at the Cecil County Community College, which we
subcontracted the work from e.e. Murray Construction Company. We had negotiated a
unit price per cubic yard of rock removed, and we were required to document the
measurements which accounted for a billing of some $275,000 to e.e. Murray.
I had spent several hundred hours on the project, most of which I had done at my office
at home. Through November, it became apparent that the e.e. Murray was trying to pass
on their own problems and mistakes with their contract with the College to us, in an
effort to relieve themselves of the $275,000 contractual liability they had with Pflumm
Contractors, Inc., This process was an enormous burden, given the impact the loss would
have to our financial, and especially considering that e.e. Murray had no legal loophole to
avoid payment to us, irregardless of any dispute they had with the college. I had proven
this through thorough documentation and the specifics of our contractual arrangements.
My policy and the policy of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., up to this point had always been to
take legal action after all other efforts for collections and contract disputes have failed. I
had demonstrated an outstanding performance in reducing the amount of bad receivables,
which had almost caused the company into bankruptcy prior to my affiliation. More Mr.
David Pflumm had always demonstrated a hard line stance in all collection matters, even
to the extreme of causing the dismissal of his own employee for failing to reimburse the
company for a $700 repair bill. Mr. David Pflumm was not known for his fairness or
good faith negotiating. His tendency was to inflate production figures, and was lack in
leniency to anyone that owed him money. This was clearly demonstrated in past
contractual disputes with the Hershey Library, Dutch Family Inn, Consolicated
Construction, and various other small accounts. His policy was consistent no matter
what the amount of the payable. Mr. Pflumm was quick to take legal action in all
disputes as soon as negotiations proved fruitless.
As early as late October I had advised Mr. Pflumm that we were exhausting our efforts
for collection of the $275,000 and that e.e. Murray was not negotiating in good faith and
was in my opinion engaging in fraudulent tactics. This transaction was of even greater
importance than any other bad receivable due to the fact that a majority of the funds at
risk were pure profits. As early as November, it was the advise of our corporate attorney,
Mr. Matt Ssamley of Xakellis, Reeese and Pugh, that a civil law suit should be
immediately filed. I had Mr. Matt Samley detail all of the legal parameters of his legal
opinion supporting his contentions.
In November, I had informed Mr. David Pflumm that I personally removed myself form
the dispute on the grounds that e.e. Murray Construction Company was not acting in
good faith, I had exhausted all available resources and means of collecting the monies
without a civil law suit being filed, and Mr. David Pflumm refused to take legal action.
By my departure on February 20th, all efforts for collecting the $275,000 proved fruitless,
and Mr. David Pflumm continued his procrastination of filing a civil lawsuit.
I am of the firm belief that the many of the negotiations and situations surrounding the
collection of payments from e.e. Murray was strategically used as ploy to inflict mental
duress for the following reasons:
1. I had exhausted most of my time during September, October, and November
while also managing my regular duties, and had requested a fee for the
collection of funds that was well beyond the scope of my duties.
2. e.e. Murray Construction Company had no legal foundation for not paying
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., irregardless of whether e.e. Murray collected
the funds from the Cecil County Community College.
3. e.e Murray had collected enough funds from Cecil County Community
College in January, and still refused any payment to Pflumm Contractors,
Inc.,
4. Mr. David Pflumm had exhibited and demonstrated an extreme sense of
leniency toward filing a civil lawsuit that was unprecedented during my
tenure and in the history of the company.
5. Over half of the $275,000 was cash for the company.
6. I allege that during the month of February, communications were used to
deceive the true nature of the situation.
7. Mr. Pflumm had always taken my advice on such matters during my tenure.
8. Lastly, the only reasonable explanation for not filing a civil complaint is that
the situation was not being truly disclosed by Mr. David Pflumm and e.e.
Murray and that a lawsuit would become public record and have adverse and
irrevocable damages to e.e. Murray Construction Company.
In late January Mr. David Pflumm laid an large envelope addressed to his home on my
desk. Inside was a letter addressed to me from AirWays Charter Service, including a
brochure depicting a plane, identical to that which was illegally repossessed from me in
1987. This was clearly a demonstrated tactic for mental duress. In the history of my
tenure, we have never discussed or had any remote need for such a service, and more
importantly, the package was addressed to Mr. David Pflumms home.
On week of February 20th, Mr. David Pflumm had provided me with documentation that
required my signature from Town & Country Leasing for my automobile that that had I
signed would have given the leasing company the right to repossess the automobile at any
given time while providing me with no legal recourse to prevent such repossession. Mr.
Pflumm had agreed to personally guarantee the payments for the automobile for the
duration of the lease, under any and all circumstances. He has breached his agreement.
During the weeks preceding my departure, in the course of my travels, I had passed many
employees on many different occasions during the course of the day. On every occasion,
not one employee would acknowledge me with a gesture or waive.
During my tenure at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., not only did I resurrect the company from
near bankruptcy, and restore the company to the best financial condition it has ever
experienced, even as important was the management policies that I had implemented that
had for the first time given the employees fair and equitable place of employment. And
their gratitude was often displayed and demonstrated toward me. The behavior of the
company, as a whole, was drastically out of character and malicious, which had resulted
in a hostile environment directly threatening my mental welfare. There is not a reason in
the world where I should have been so maliciously treated. The pain and suffering was
so great, that I specifically sought the advice and help of Fr. Edward Lavelle on January
14th, in the Office of the Bishiop.
Any further detail to this document would greatly compromise my rights for any future
litigation which may or may not transpire.
I Attest,
M ANSCO, INC.
Develop Images
Called 03/07/90
Jim Dering/ In Contact
Pre-Qualify Question
2/10/1990
NATIONAL ASSOC
OF WATCH &
Develop Multimedia
Applciation
CLOCK COLLECTOR
Bid $ 47,500
32925
Inf ormal Budget
Meeting July
PAT TOM ES/
PAUL WILLS
1/5/1990
PARSONS &
Develop Technical
Project 4th on Priority
Application
6-8 Weeks
32988
Pre-Qualifying Quest
Meeting 03/28/90
Call 05/31/90
Contact Tao /Status
BRINKERHOFF
Approval 02/25/90
General Council
Contact 04/05/90
Test Image
05/31/90 Storyboard
Send ROM Inf ormation
ENGINEERS
TAO M ATLOCK
M ARCIA EARLE
FORD
NEW HOLLAND
ROBERT SHIVELY
1/27/1990
General Discussions
Replication Bid
Commitment to
2/8/1990
DATAWARE
Bid W/Steve Sw an ?
Keep in Touch
CARM EN M ARTIN
M OBIL OIL, INC.
LYNN HYLAND
GENERIC
SOFTWARE, INC.
Legal Documentation
Verbal Approval
Contacted 06/01/90
03/08/90/S. Robertson
Left Message
Bid $47,500
1/13/1990
June or July Start Date
Develop Sof tw are
CONTACT
and Technical Docs
M ARK WILEY?
INDIANA BELL
CONTACT
2/5/1990
REF BRUCE KLINE
CONGRESSIONAL
CD-DIAGNOSTICS
INFO SYSTEM S
Sent Version 1.2
CONTACT
& Technical Specs

M ICROSOFT, INC
CD-DIAGNOSTICS
License Agreement
CONTACT
Evaluate 02/28/90
Tech Docs 03/08/90
BELL ATLANTIC
Develop Directory
Sample Date by
Cost Meeting f or
Invoice Story $1,000
Called 05/31/90
"PAPER GLUT"
32952
Prototype & Present
"CD-ROM" $450
Lef t Message Data?
Inf o f or Demo
Send "CD-ROM TECH"
3/20/1990
3/26/1990
TANDY
Develop 2000 Images
Submit Data ?
Contact D. Williams
CDD Rev 1.4 to Phil
ELECTRONICS, INC
Technical Document
M. Grubbs "get data
05/02,03,05/90 No Ans.
Debord 05/31/90
KEN CLARK
Storyboard 04/12/90
M IKE GRUBBS
DAVE WILLIAM S
Will verif y Data & Qty

5/3/1990
from D. Williams"
Meeting 03/15/90
32992
Letter to Dave Willims
Called M. Grubbs
PHIL DEBORD/CDD
Action Plan 03/22/90
CDD rev1-4
33001
Lef t Mssg 05/31/90
EXXON RESEARCH
Multimedia Application
D. Benf er "having
Storyboard Demo PBS
AND PRODUCTION
Technical Application
trouble w /security
to D. Benf er 06/01/90
COM PANY
Sample Data ??
clearance f or data"
Meeting 03/15/90
D. Benf er "w ill deliver
32995
CD-DIAGNOSTICS
Revised CDD 1.2
License Agreement
With Tech Docs
DAVE BENFER
COM PAQ, INC
KEN SHUFFLEBEAM
soon" 04/09/90
3,000-6,000 users
32939
KEEP IN TOUCH
letter 03/29/90
IPSOA
CD-DIAGNOSTICS
License 8,000 Users
Send CDD Rev 1.2
3/7/1990
VEDA, INC.
Air Force Tech Docs
05/31/90 "Moving Slow

Writing Specs f or Bid"
DAVE TUEM LER
Called 03/26/90
Call back 04/26/90
Will Call w hen he has

any new s---inf luence
CBIS, INC
Netw ork Solutions
Send Questionairs
other Docs
JIM YOUNG
Ref f eral Relationship

Meeting 04/12/90
LIBRARY OF
CONGRESS
32983
Call f or V isitation
Demo Retrieval
Send Follow Up
Wayne Called on
System to Comittee
Package 03/22/90
04/25/90 -- Data ???
3/14/1990
DREW LEWIS
COM MODORE
Called on 04/04/90
Replicate on 01/15/90
BUSINESS
Sent f or RFP'S
f or Replication Bid
05/18/90 -- 05/28/90
Meeting
Developer Application
32946
In 05/22/90
Developer Package
M ACHINES, INC
M IKE KAWAHARA
GAIL WITTENBERG
AM P, INC
ED BEAUREGARD
Out 05/31/90
Replicate on 03/09/90
PO #30246784 @100
$3,000
Run 05/04/90 - 05/11/90
Reorder 100 03/22/90
$3000 / $7250
$200
PO # N/A @2500
Run 06/11/90 - 06/15/90
U. S. POSTAL
SERVICE
Telephone Tag
CONTACT
PAUL JACKSON
ARTHUR
ANDERSON
AT&T / DATA DEV.
Replicate 2 IBM Discs
Bid World Bank Project
Tapes 03/27/90
32952
200,000 Images
STEVE SWAN
Waiting For Tapes
From Steve Sw an
BANCROFT AND
WHINTNEY
965,000 PAGES OF
Steve visit 04/10/90
CA Legal Statutes
Wayne prepare Demo
DDI / STEVE SWAN

NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF
Specs on 03/31/90
Replication Bid Due
Never Finished
Ref errals given 04/25/90 05/09/90 Aw ard Contract
3/30/1990
STANDARDS AND Test Tapes on 04/16/90

TECHNOLOGY To Distics 04/18/90 "ok"
Verif y "excellent rec."
$20,000 Replication
on 05/03/90
Order As Needed
JOHN GARFOLIO
AMERICAN
BANKERS
Complience Manuals
Meeting At Helix
Meet At ABA
& Regulations
33022
06/15/90 @11:00
ASSOCIATION
GOOD Meeting

Documents of Interest Re Synthetic Telepathy May 26, 2015

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Documents of Interest Re Synthetic Telepathy May 26, 2015

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

scaterbone@live.

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Hon. P. Michael Sturla

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Matthew E. Baker

Hon. Scott W. Boyd

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone,

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Thomas R. Caltagirone

Hon. Katie True

Hon. Ron Marsico

Hon. Scott E. Hutchinson,

Jeffrey E. Piccola (R)

Michael W. Brubaker (R)

City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use Against

Its hard to even guesstimate the number of people, not just in

STATE-OF-AFFAIRS AND OBSTACLES FOR FINDING AN EQUITABLE

Obstacle 6: Computer Hacking is becoming more mainstreamed and synchronized with

The Mass Media is owned by too few corporations.

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigator

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGATOR

Sheryl Crow's stalker terror

September 19, 2008

Dear Dr. Phil:

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>

2-Document Archive of ICOMW 1982 Central Intelligence Agency

new procedures Inman objected to included the use of synthetic

3-WITHIN A MONTH! THE BRINGING DOWN OF BOBBY RAY INMAN

role as a member of the board of International Signal and Control, a firm

Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:14:28 -0500

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

P.O. Box 9022

Brief History Of MK-Ultra

Brief History Of MK-Ultra

Brief History Of MK-Ultra

Brief History Of MK-Ultra

Brief History Of MK-Ultra

Bobby Ray Inman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bobby Ray Inman

Bobby Ray Inman (born April 4, 1931) is a retired United

Bobby Ray Inman

Inman's official CIA photo, 1983

United States Navy

Inman has been influential in various advisory roles. Notably,

Bobby Ray Inman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination for Secretary of Defense

International Signal and Control (ISC) Scandal

Bobby Ray Inman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Director of the National Security Agency

CIA Deputy Director

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bobby_Ray_Inman&oldid=663093410"

Bobby Ray Inman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was last modified on 19 May 2015, at 15:01.

Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote Control of the Huma...

Russia & FSU

Notre site en Franais: mondialisation.ca

Global Research Newsletter:

Latest News / Top Stories

Psychotronic and Electromagnetic Weapons: Remote

The Root Cause of the Migrant Crisis

Empower Yourself to Fight the Power

Global Research, March 16, 2014