Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER I
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
A food may be defined as any substance, which when taken into the body can be utilized
to yield heat and energy, to built up new tissues and to repair worn-out tissues aid to aid
in production of important body compounds. The science of nutrition deals with good
values, good processing, its digestion, adsorption and metabolism, depends to a major
degree, on the use of right kinds of food. Nutrition has been established as one of the
most important environmental factors affecting health. Milk is a diary product, and is
highly nutritive. It is one of the moist essential of all foods as it is one of the most
complete single foods available in the nature for health and promotion of growth.
Milk can be defines in normal terms as the liquid from the mammary gland of healthy
and normally fed cows. Freshly drawn milk varies in chemical composition. Some of the
more important causes of variation are the species of mammals, the breed, the age of the
individual, the stage of her lactation, her feed and the season of the year. The average
chemical composition based on the analysis of a large number of milk sample are shown
in the table 1.
Table 1: Average chemical composition of milk
Constituents
Water
Lactose (Carbohydrate or milk sugar)
Butter fat
Casein (enzyme)
Albumin & Globlulin (Protein)
Mineral
Percentage (%)
87.3
5.0
3.8
2.5
0.7
0.7
Milk also conation vitamin A, B or thiamine and B-2 or riboflavin. It contains small
amount of vitamins C and D with trace quantities of other vitamins. Milk, therefore,
provides essential nutrients for excellent growth of many bacterial species. Sterile skim
milk is routinely employed in the laboratory for the growth and maintenance of bacteria.
Raw milk always source such as bacteria derived from various sources such as mild
dusts of udder and for adulteration, diseased animal (e.g. suffering from mastitis,
tuberculosis, etc). Type of bacteria likely to be found in healthy cow includes following
groups of bacteria;
1. Acid forming Streptococcus faecalis, S. lactis, Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus spp.
1
General public use the packed milk without being aware of its microbiological quality
since it is supposed to be pasteurized. However due to inadequate pasteurization or the
post pasteurization contamination at any stage of processing, handling and packaging
could create havoc in its quality. A very little contamination of such pathogens could
reach to dangerous level as soon as they obtain favourable condition for their growth. In
2
Milk, which has been allowed to age sufficiently (i.e. milk that has become old).
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
S. No
1
2
3
Counts of viable bacteria are commonly based on the number of colonies that develop in
nutrient agar plates which have been inoculated with known amounts of diluted foods
and then incubated under prescribed environmental conditions. Only those bacteria,
which will grow under the chosen environmental conditions, can be counted. The use of
plate counts has a number of advantages. If it is high, or if it varies widely among
samples from different lots or within a lot, microbiological control in processing or
transport was probably inadequate. There are, however, limitations to the value of
5
To determine the total bacteria and coliform colony in the milk by standard plate
count (SPC) method.
ii.
i.
The sampling was performed only once hence the result may not be summarised to
accurate value.
ii.
Other factors such as refrigerator temperature, quality of water used for cleaning the
equipments, percentage constitution of water in milk, duration of storage were not
taken into considered.
iii.
CHAPTER 2
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Department of Health (1997) states it is advisable that foods for which standards have
been set, be tested so that further action can be taken. This would include education of
food handlers and food processors as well as the taking of legal action. In terms of raw
foods (meat or poultry) it should be borne in mind that these products are likely to have
high microbiological counts and that certain enteric pathogens are associated with these
products. It is also important to remember that the hygiene of the premises is regarded as
extremely important and this is probably one of the important factors in ensuring a safe
product at the end of the day.
Rimal Poshana (2003) studied the microbial quality of dairy product, curd of Nepal. He
found that the average number of microorganisms observed in the curd sample was
5200 cfu/gm which included gram positive spore former yeast and fungus with blast
spores. The study concludes that the contamination may have happened from inadequate
pasteurization or post pasteurization contamination at any stage of manufacturing,
processing and handling.
Litwiczuk et al. (1999) and Przysucha et al. (2003) documented difficulties to obtain
high quality milk during the summer season. All of them reported that higher air
temperatures favour the increase of bacteria number, especially on the surfaces of no
good enough cleaned up milking equipment which were the potential source of infection.
Joshi DR et al. (2004) accessed microbial quality of some selected national and
international brands of ice cream being sold in Kathmandu valley by studying 72 ice
cream samples of twelve different brands (6 Nepalese and 6 foreign brands). Out of total,
44 samples (61.1%), 49 samples (68.1%) and 16 samples (22.2%) exceeded standard
value of mesophilic aerobic count, total coliform count and Staphylococcal count
respectively. However, only one sample (1.4%) was found to be contaminated with
Salmonella spp. The microbial quality of with additive ice cream samples was poorer
in comparison to plain samples. The overall microbial quality of ice cream samples being
sold in Kathmandu valley was concluded to be poor.
Rajak Sudha (2004) performed qualitative estimation on quality of milk in markets of
Kathmandu. She isolated Escherichia coli in 3 of the milk samples of the total 5 milk
7
CHAPTER 3
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Method
Various methods can be employed for determining of total bacteria as well as coliform in
a food sample. Total plat count method was followed to study the total bacteria in the
milk samples whereas solid medium plating method was used for coliform count. This
was followed by bio-chemical tests such as IMViC, triple sugar iron test (TSIA), gram
staining. Method described by K.R. Aneja (2005) and Manandhar & Sharma (2006) were
adapted for enumeration.
3.1.1 Sampling
Around 15 milk sample were collected from various retailer shops, dairy farms in the
Sankhamul area of Kathmandu in the sterile sampling bottles. The collected samples
belong to various registered as well as unregistered brands of pasteurized and raw milk
as well as branded pasteurized milk. The sampling bottles were sterilized by autoclaving
it for 15 minutes at 1210C (15lb/in2). The samples were collected in an ice box and
carried to laboratory as soon as possible for microbial analysis. The collected samples
were handled aseptically in the laboratory to minimise the contamination. The milk
samples were collected between the periods of 2nd Shrawan 2068 to 10th Shrawan 2068.
Table 5: Sample categorization
Sample Number
Code
Type
Sample 1
RT 1
Unbranded pasteurized milk
Sample 2
RT 2
Unbranded pasteurized milk
Sample 3
RT 3
Unbranded pasteurized milk
Sample 4
RT 4
Unbranded pasteurized milk
Sample 5
RT 5
Unbranded pasteurized milk
Sample 6
PK 1
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 7
PK 2
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 8
PK 3
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 9
PK 4
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 10
PK 5
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 11
PK 6
Branded pasteurized milk
Sample 12
RW 1
Raw milk
Sample 13
RW 2
Raw milk
Sample 14
RW 3
Raw milk
Sample 15
RW 4
Raw milk
10
11
CHAPTER 4
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Results
The experimental results of number of colonies obtained in various medium as well as
bio-chemical tests were graphically analyzed. The bacterial load in PCA medium is
shown in figure 1. It was recorded to be high in raw milk samples with highest value
being 27.04105 cfu/mL in RW 1 followed by 24.82105 cfu/mL in RW 3 and
23.21105 cfu/mL in RW 4 respectively. The least value were recorded for both branded
pasteurized milk samples as well as in unbranded pasteurized milk samples with
3.83105 cfu/mL in PK 4, followed by 6.23105 cfu/mL in RT 1 and 7.35105 cfu/mL in
RT 4 respectively.
12
Sample
No.
MR VP Citrate
TSAI
Gram
staining
Remark
Colony
character
RT1
Acid, gas, no
H2S production
Gram
negative
Red colour,
rod shaped
RT5
Acid, gas, no
H2S production
Gram
negative
Red colour,
rod shaped
PK1
Acid, gas, no
H2S production
Gram
negative
Red colour,
rod shaped
PK5
Acid, gas, no
H2S production
Gram
negative
Red colour,
rod shaped
RW3
Gram
negative
Red colour,
rod shaped
13
E. coli,
Shigella
dysnteriae
E. coli,
Shigella
dysnteriae
E. coli,
Shigella
dysnteriae
E. coli,
Shigella
dysnteriae
Salmonella
typhimurium
Salmonella
Raw milk
24.47105
Unsatisfactory
Present
Present
4.2 Discussion
Analysis of raw, unbranded pasteurized milk and branded pasteurized milk samples in
the market of Sankhamul showed that the samples were heavily contaminated with both
coliform and bacterial load. Branded pasteurized milk was found to be contaminated by
relatively lower number of bacteria than the number found in other samples. This may be
due to processing of milk such as pasteurization, clarification and homogenization singly
or in combination. Unbranded milk sample although were stored in refrigerator but
appropriate temperature (below 00C) was hardly maintained in the retail shop whereas
the raw milk samples were directly taken to consumers without any pre-treatment. Thus
the bacterial load was found to be more in these samples.
The result of mean TBC in raw milk sample (24.47105 cfu/mL) was 24 fold of
international standard (EU standard) (1x105 cfu/mL) while mean unbrande pasturized
milk (11.87105 cfu/mL) reached 12 folds and branded pasturized milk (10.21105
cfu/mL) reached 10 folds of international standards (Hutchison, 2012). The value of
14
15
CHAPTER 5
5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The results obtained during the study on the hygienic quality of raw milk in Sankhamul
indicate that the current situation is critical and needs real improvement. In effect, a great
majority of milk samples had very high level of bacteria and coliform such as E.coli,
Shigella and Salmonella. The presence of those bacteria in milk suggested contamination
from various sources, such as animal, human, environment, utensils and others. Milking
and other handling equipment that are the potential source for increasing the bacterial
load in developing country likes Nepal where the traditional manual method of milking
is still in practice. Contaminated water, transportation time, cleanliness of equipments
and temperature of milk are the important factors for bacterial contamination.
Unsatisfactory hygiene and sanitary conditions of milk samples suggests the existence of
great risk to the health of consumers, especially when the product is taken without being
boiled.
5.2 Recommendations
The bacteriological study has drawn attention to poor microbiological quality of milk
available in the market. In order to safeguard the public health various suggestions are
recommended.
Nepal Dairy Development Board (NDDB) should bring all dairy stakeholders
together to set milk pricing policy in order to stimulate the awareness among farmers
and processors for quality milk production.
There should be a mechanism to educate the food handlers, milkers and factories for
following basic sanitation and health practices especially washing hands, use of
proper method in storing, preparing and serving food products.
16
References
Aneja, K. R. (2005), Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology and Bio-technology,
fourth edition, New Age International Publishers, India
Chatterjee S. N., Bhattacharjee I., Chatterjee S.K and Chandra G. (2006),
Microbiological Examination of Milk in Tarakeswar, India with Special Reference to
Coliforms, African Journal of Biotechnology, 5 (15): 1383-1385, Available online at
http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB
Dahal Lekh Raj, Dainik B. Nepali Karki and Ramashish Shah (2010), Total Bacterial
Counts of Raw Milk in Eastern Terai of Nepal, Technical Paper, The Journal of
Agriculture and Environment, 11: 46-50
de Centorbi, O. P. et al. (1989), Determination of Sanitary Quality and Detection of
Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in Ice-cream, Rev Agent Microbial,
21:63-69
Department of Health (1997), Guideline for Environmental Health Officers on the
Interpretation of Microbiological Analysis Data of Food, Department of Health
Directorate: Food Control, pp. 3-5
Gilbert, R.J., D Roberts, FJ Bolton, J de Louvois, C Little, T Donovan, K Nye,
CD Ribeiro, J Richards (2000), Guidelines for the Microbiological Quality of Some
Ready-to-eat Foods Samples at the Point of Sale, Communicable Disease and Public
Health 3, 163-167
Mubarack H. Muhamed, A. Doss, R. Dhanabalan and S. Balachander (2010), Microbial
Quality of Raw Milk Samples Collected from Different villages of Coimbatore District,
Tamilnadu, South India, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3 (1): 61-63
Hutchison, Dr. Charles (2012), Evaluating Milk Quality, Department of Dairy Science,
LSU Agriculture Center
Joshi DR, P. K. Shah, S Manandhar, S Sharma and P Banmali (2004), Microbial Quality
of Ice Cream Sold in Kathmandu, Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 2(2): 37-40
17
18