C.S.No.

53A/15

11.05.2015
Present:

ProxyCounselforplaintiffswithplaintiffs
ProxyCounselforMCDwithJLOandwith
Sh.RajeevKumar,AdministrativeOfficerinperson
Sh.AjitKumar,LicensingInspectorinperson.
It is submitted on behalf of MCD that written

statement could not be filed for want of attestation, due to

Lawyersbeingonstrike.Ihaveperusedthecopyandreturned
thesame.Perusedtherecordalso.
The stand taken by the MCD appears that no
permissionwasgrantedbytheMCDeverforrunningtheweekly
Bazaar.ItisfurthersubmittedthatNOCwasdeclinedbyTraffic
Policein2011itself.
Oninquiry,itissubmittedthattherearesixweekly
BazaarsbeingorganizedinDwarkaandinnoneofthose,MCD
hasevergrantedpermission.
ItisfurthersubmittedthatMCDissimplyissuing
TehbazariReceipt/R4tothehawkersinthoseweeklyBazaars.It
isfurthersubmitted,oninquirythatonlyoncearoundin2011
for one dayTehbazarireceipt/R4 was issuedtotheHawkers.
Even,intheweeklyBazaarinSector7.Subsequentlyorearlier,
ithasneverbeenissuedandnobazaarisbeingorganizedover
thereforlong.
Myattentionwasdrawnonbehalfofplaintiffstoa
letteratpageno.21ofthelistofdocumentswhichappearstobe
aletterwrittenbyDDAinrespectofinspectionbyDwarka

2
Planning Office on 23.11.2007 wherein reference to weekly
BazaarbeingorganizedatSector7isalsothere.Thisletterwas
tobeplacedbeforetheCommissioner,MCDalso. Thisfurther
refersthatMPD2021recognizesweeklymarketandtalksabout
theplanningforoperationoftheseweeklymarketssothatthese
markets be not located on master plan road/zonal plan road
whichcouldinterferewiththeTrafficbutcouldbelocatedinthe
parkingandotheropenspace.
MCD is directed to file detailed written statement
takingintoconsiderationalltheaforesaidacpects. Itappears
that the aforesaid weekly bazaar was infact operating on the
serviceroadalongthewallofSikhshaBhartiSchoolasperthe
survey conducted by DDA, Dwarka, as reflected in the office
letterofMCDitself.
Defendantno.1&2arealsodirectedtofilewritten
statementinthismatter.Noticebeissuedtodefendantno.1&
2inthisregardalongwithcopyoftheorder.
Putupon22.05.2015at02:00p.m.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.

189/13

11.05.2015
Present:

Plaintiffinperson
Defendantno.1inperson.
ProxyCounselforDefendantno.6MCD.
Lawyers are abstaining from work on account of

strike.Caseisatthestageofcrossexaminationoftheplaintiff.
Perusedtherecord.
Plaintiff is seeking permanent and mandatory
injunction restraining defendant from transferring the suit
propertyorraisinganyillegalconstructionandfurtherpraying
fordirectionfordemolitionofillegalconstruction.
Plaintiff is claiming her right on the basis that
propertywaspurchasedbyhergrandfatherwhodiedintestate
and subsequently thereto father of plaintiff died intestate.
Defendantno.1to4whoarebrother,sisterandwifeofJawahar
SinghandGrandMotheroftheplaintiff,whoaretryingtosell
thepropertytodefendantno.5.
In the written statement contention of
maintainability of the suit without seeking partition has been
raised.ItisfurtherstatedthatJawaharSinghwhoisfatherofthe
plaintiffhadpurchasedthesuitpropertyintheyear1981and

2
expired in 2009 bequeathing his all assets including the suit
propertytohiswifeSmtRamwatiDefendantno.2throughWill
dated09.07.2009.
To come up on 05.08.2015 for tendering
clarificationsandargumentsonthemaintainabilityofthesuitin
itspresentformbeforeproceedingfurtherwiththismatter.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.

59/14

11.05.2015
Present:

Noneforplaintiff.
Defendantno.1inperson.

Affidavit of evidence not filed. Advance copy not

given. Lawyersareabstainingfromworkonaccountofstrike.
Onefurtheropportunityisgrantedtotheplaintifftocomplythe
directions for supplying the advance copy of affidavit of
evidence.
Tocomeupon 11.08.2015 fortenderingandcross
examination.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.

93/14

11.05.2015
Present:

Sh.VijaySonofplaintiffinperson
Nonefordefendant.

Lawyers are abstaining from work on account of

strike,tocomeupon04.08.2015forfilingreplyandarguments
onapplicationunderOrder7rule11CPCandalsohearingon
theaspectofpossession.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.

140/12

11.05.2015
Present:

ProxyCounselforplaintiff.
Defendantinperson.

CaseisatthestageofPE.Plaintiffhasalreadybeen
crossexamined in this case. No affidavit of evidence filed.
Advancecopyhasalsonotbeengiven. Itappearsthatthereis
nolistofwitnessesfiledinthiscase,aslawyersareabstaining
fromworkonaccountofstrike. Intheinterestofjustice,one
opportunity is granted for RPE. Advance copy of affidavit of
evidencebegiventotheoppositecounsel.Officialwitnesses,if
any,besummonedwellinadvance.
Putupon24.08.2015.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.
82/15
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
11.05.2015
Present:

ProxyCounselforplaintiffwithplaintiff

Heard.Fileperused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice to the
applicationtothedefendantonfilingofPF&RCreturnablefor
21.05.2015. Plaintiff is at liberty to accompany the Process
Serveratthetimeofservice.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.
83/15
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
11.05.2015
Present:

None

Fileperused.
Issue summons of the suit and notice to the
applicationtothedefendantsonfilingofPF&RCreturnablefor
06.07.2015.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015

C.S.No.

63/15

11.05.2015
Present:

ProxyCounselforplaintiff.

Heard.
Amended plaint was already filed on 06.04.2014
givendetailsinpara3oftheamendedplaint.
Itisfurthersubmittedthataslawyersarepresently
abstainingfromworkonaccountofstrike,anapplicationunder
Order 6 Rule 17 CPC giving specific details as to the
incorporationsandamendmentsmadewouldbefiledshortly.
SubjecttofilingoftheapplicationunderOrder6Rule17CPC,
noticeoftheamendedplaintbeissuedonfilingofPF&RCfor
27.05.2015,asprayed.

(VipinKumarRai)
JSCCASCJcumGuardianJudge,
DwarkaCourts:Delhi/11.05.2015