Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Introduction
Office Profile Overview
HDA are specialist design consultants on
glazing and structure generally for projects where
these elements are key elements of architectural
composition. HDAs work involves exploring the
Main Frame
Paper Structural Glass Architecture
Structural use of glass has seen a considerable
popularity during the last decade, and in particular
thanks to the use of more sophisticated point fixed
glazing systems. The exploitation of these systems
has reached extensive possibilities through the
greater understanding of the structural potential
of glass itself and the analytical techniques made
possible with computers. Our own phobias on the
fragility of glass is gradually becoming replaced
by an acceptation of its structural potential. This
liberation of glass as an architectural component
has led to a greater potential in the articulation of
wind bracing structures in cable, steel and
glass itself. The understanding of the symbiotic
relationship between these bracing structures and
the glass leads to a development in a change of
attitude toward these two traditionally distinct
domains glass belonged to cladding and
curtain-wall trades while structure belonged to
a separate steel trade. The building industrys
professional designers and contractors are
adapting their working methods to the new potentials of glass and its bracing structure in
architecture and a different relationship within the
industry.
Point-fixed glass first appeared with Pilkington
Glasss point fixed glass system used on the
Farnborough office building by Arup Associates
and Sir Norman Fosters Swindon Renault factory
in the early 1980s. Following these projects the
monumental greenhouses at the La Villette
Science museum was a significant development
503
Session 10
Session 10
Case Studies
Greenhouses, Cite des Sciences et Industrie,
La Villette, Paris 19811986
Image
Client: Channel 4; Architects: Richard Rogers and Partners;
Engineers :Ove Arup and Ptns; Contractor: Eiffel Constructions
Metalliques, with design and engineering consultant RFR
Image
Client: Etablissement Public du Parc de La Villette; Architect:
Adrien Fainsilber; Facade Design and Engineering: RFR;
Contractor: CFEM (now Eiffel Constructions Metalliques)
504
Session 10
Image
Client: SNC Avenue Montaigne, Arc Union; Architects:
Glaiman, Epstein, Vidal; Facade Design and Engineering: RFR;
Contractor: Eiffel Constructions Metalliques
Image: Photo
Client Swire; Arch. Wong & Ouyang; Facade Consultants:
Meinhardt Faade Technology; Contractor URC with Hugh
Dutton
505
Session 10
506
Image: Photo
Client: ; Arch. Rocco; Facade Consultant: Heitmann &
Associates; Contractor: URC with Hugh Dutton
Session 10
Image: Perspective
Client: Columbia University of New York; Arch. Bernard
Tschumi Gruzen Samton associated architects; Design
Consultant: Hugh Dutton; Engineers: Ove Arup NY; Contractor:
Eiffel
Image: Perspective
507
Image: Perspective
Image: Axo
Session 10
508
Image: Perspective
Client, Osaka Port and Harbour Bureau; Architect: Paul
Andreu; Engineers: Ove Arup and Partners International Ltd.
and Tohata; Facade design consultant: Hugh Dutton
7: Summary
Future considerations and potential architectural developments: Light Skins, Structure and
Glass
We can consider a building envelopes
fundamental technical components as Structure
and Skin. The structure supports it and the skin
keeps the weather out. Lighter, more compact and
efficient structures allow the skin to play a larger
and more responsive role to light, the critical
ingredient in the perception of architecture. The
skin can become a filter to light -either as a
transparent, translucent or even a variable
chameleon type surface that can change its
nature.
Technology has permitted a slow and gradual
transformation of buildings from solid structural
walls with only small holes for light to penetrate
through, to thin envelopes which modulate and
control light and architectural transparency as well
as energy gains and losses.
Structure
Technological advances in the building
industry and developments in structural
engineering have removed structure from walls.
High performance materials such as reinforced
concrete, steel etc. have allowed efficient
structures, reducing the quantity of it. Engineering
developments have through a greater understanding of how buildings behave, further contributed to lightweightness. In particular the use
of computers which enable more interactive
structures to be conceived and analysed. Nonlinear analysis methods exploit computers by
doing multitudes of reiterative calculations for a
structure simulating its change in shape as it
reacts to load. This closer analysis of how
structures behave allows designers to better
understand the nature of structures and to further
exploit their potential than would be the case with
more primitive analysis methods.
These building technology developments lead
to a concentration of structure It gets thinner and
becomes more efficient. Columns get smaller,
bearing walls disappear and generally structure
becomes lighter weight.
Skin
509
Session 10
References
Session 10
510