Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No.:
19
20
COMPLAINT
Trademark Infringement
(15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.);
Copyright Infringement
(17 USC 101 et seq);
False Advertisement
(Cal Bus & Prof Code 17500 et seq)
Unfair Competition
(Cal Bus & Prof Code 17200 et seq)
Counterfeiting
(Cal Bus & Prof Code 14245 et seq)
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
21
22
PARTIES
23
24
25
26
27
operates both an online retail website, and brick and mortar stores located in Berkeley, California
28
COMPLAINT - 1
1
2
which is within this district. The Alameda County Recorder reports no entries for Big Als in
its database. Moreover, the business name is not registered with the city of Berkeley.
3. Ali Ghannam and Sam Ghannam, was at all times pertinent to this complaint, the owners
4
5
and operators of BIG ALS and directed the intentional and tortious conduct of their business
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States;
14
b. 28 U.S.C. 1367, which gives the district courts supplemental jurisdiction over
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
INTRODUCTION
22
23
24
25
8. Precisions Owner, David Goldstein (Goldstein), is known throughout the industry for
26
27
28
his state of the art designs for high-end premium glassware that assists smoking or vaporizing
tobacco, medical marijuana, and other legal inhalants.
COMPLAINT - 2
1
2
9. In four states: Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska, recreational use of marijuana
is permitted. More importantly, in many other states, including California, medical marijuana is
an increasingly viable treatment for many chronic conditions. As a result, the demand for high4
5
quality glassware to deliver medically active ingredients ingredient has grown significantly.
10. Goldsteins interest in fritted disc technology drove him to develop a process for creating
the ideal fritted disc. After achieving promising results, Goldstein began integrating fritted discs
into his product, becoming the first in the industry to employ such technology. Goldstein has
9
10
been awarded a United States Patent 8,973,585 in connection with technology for devices needed
11
to ingest the active ingredients of medical marijuana, as well as other tobacco, and clove
12
products.
13
11. The embodiment of this technology has been marketed, and is well known throughout the
14
12. As a result of Goldsteins innovation, Precision was the first in the industry to employ
17
such technology, and is now one of the most well-known suppliers of high-end fritted disc
18
glassware used in the consumption of tobacco, clove, and traditional middle-eastern flavored
19
tobaccos. Moreover, Precision is well known in the industry as the only manufacturer and
20
13. Precision has been manufacturing the Rooster and other contemporary smoking and
23
vaporizing accessories since 2011. Goldstein is the owner of Precision and invented the
24
25
14. The Rooster image was created for and assigned to Goldstein at Precision. This image
26
27
28
has been used exclusively on fritted Precision product and trade materials since associated
therewith since 2011, and associated trade materials since 2000.
COMPLAINT - 3
1
2
15. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. Goldstein registered the Rooster mark with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on August 14, 2012. U.S. Trademark Serial Number
85,597,566 (the 566 mark). Subsequently, all rights of use of the Rooster mark were assigned
4
5
to Precision. The mark has been in continuous use since the date it was registered on various
Precision products.
7
8
16. PRECISIONs primary marketing method consists of direct manufacturer to retailer sales
at various tradeshows, most notably, the Champs Counter Culture tradeshows (CHAMPS) in
9
10
Atlantic City, NJ, Denver, CO, and Las Vegas, NV and the American Glass Exposition(AGE)
11
in Las Vegas, NV, Denver, CO, and Baltimore, MD. The two CHAMPS shows and AGE
12
account for the majority of Precisions sales throughout the year. The remaining sales are made
13
up at various direct manufacturer to consumer trade shows, other trade publications, and
14
reputational sales.
15
16
17
18
19
20
19. Except for limited use in promotional materials, Precision has never licensed the use of
21
22
its the Rooster mark to any party for their private sale or distribution.
23
20. Sometime on or around September 2013, defendant, Big Als, began to offer for sale,
24
glass product with a similar design, style, and overall appearance of Precisions Rooster products
25
21. The distribution and sale of counterfeit Rooster product for a significantly reduced price
has limited Precisions market share. Furthermore, Big Als has profited from its distribution and
COMPLAINT - 4
1
2
sale of counterfeit Rooster product. Finally, Precision has been required to pay for the costs of
this litigation.
22. On or around February, 2015 Goldstein received notice from an industry source, Rajinesh
4
5
Padarath (Padarath), informing him that Roosters were being sold at Big Als.
23. Goldstein had not sold the product in question to Big Als in over two years. Moreover,
other source identifiers suggested the product was counterfeit. Goldstein verified through photo
9
10
24. Goldstein requested that Padarath purchase the product. Pradarath purchased the product
11
on April 1, 2015, and mailed it directly to Goldstein. Pradarath provided a purchase receipt, and
12
photographic evidence of his purchase from Big Als. The receipt shows a purchase price of
13
14
25. Based on the physical evidence, Goldstein determined that Precision had not
15
16
manufactured the product bearing the Rooster image and mark purchased at Big Als.
COUNT I
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
17
18
19
20
21
22
26. Precision repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through
25, and the same incorporated herein by reference.
27. Precision is the owner of U.S. Trademark Serial Number 85/507,566 Rooster Mark.
28. Precision has placed the Rooster Mark on its water-cooled pipes in such a manner that the
23
24
consuming public has come to associate the Rooster image with the high quality fritted disk
25
water-cooled pipe. The Rooster Mark is prominently displayed on the water-cooled pipe and on
26
27
28
COMPLAINT - 5
1
2
29. Defendants distributed, offered for sale, and sold products bearing the Rooster Mark
without authorization which were not purchased from Precision the only licensed wholesaler of
Rooster product in violation of Precisions right to exclusive use of the Rooster mark.
4
5
6
7
8
30. Defendants acted willfully to distribute, offer for sale, and sell product bearing the 566
mark, and as such, their actions cause a likelihood of confusion.
31. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been infringed in an amount as yet to be
determined and is entitled to the remedies as provided for in 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.
COUNT II
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
10
11
32. Precision repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through
12
13
14
15
16
17
34. Defendants distributed, offered for sale, and sold products bearing the a replica of the
18
19
Rooster Image; Precision has not licensed the Rooster Image to Defendants nor has authorized
20
35. Defendants acted willfully to distribute, offer for sale, and sold product bearing the
21
22
copyright protected Rooster Image which were not purchased from a licensed source.
36. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff has been infringed in an amount as yet to be
23
24
determined and is entitled to the remedies provided for by 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT - 6
COUNT III
UNFAIR COMPETITION
2
3
4
5
37. Precision repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through
38, and the same incorporated herein by reference.
38. Defendants distributed, sold, and/or offered for sale Rooster product at a price that is
39. Defendants purpose was to injure competitors or destroy competition for competitors
selling legitimate goods.
40. As a result of Defendants below cost sales, Precision was harmed in an as yet to be
11
determined amount and is entitled to the remedies permitted under Cal. Civ. Code 17200 et seq.
12
13
14
41. By reason of the foregoing, Defendants conduct was a substantial factor which caused
Plaintiffs harm.
15
COUNT IV
FALSE ADVERTISING
16
17
18
19
42. Precision repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through
43, and the same incorporated herein by reference,
43. Defendants displayed, sold, stated, and held out to consumers that the unlicensed product
20
it distributed, offered for sale, and/or sold was authentic Rooster product.
21
22
44. Defendants displays, sales, statements, and holding out to consumers that the unlicensed
23
product it distributed, offered for sale, and/or sold was authentic Rooster product was material to
24
25
45. As a result of Defendants displays, sales, statements, and holding out to consumers that
26
27
28
the unlicensed product was authentic Rooster product, Precision was harmed in an as yet to be
determined amount and is entitled to the remedies permitted under Cal. Civ. Code 17500 et seq.
COMPLAINT - 7
COUNT IV
COUNTERFEITING
2
3
4
5
46. Precision repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through
45, and the same incorporated herein by reference,
47. Defendants displayed, sold, stated, and held out to consumers that the unlicensed product
it distributed, offered for sale, and/or sold was authentic Rooster product.
7
8
48. Defendants displays, sales, statements, and holding out to consumers that the unlicensed
product it distributed, offered for sale, and/or sold was authentic Rooster product was material to
10
11
49. As a result of Defendants displays, sales, statements, and holding out to consumers that
12
13
14
the unlicensed product was authentic Rooster product, Precision was harmed in an as yet to be
determined amount and is entitled to the remedies permitted under Cal. Civ. Code 14245 et seq.
15
16
17
18
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court enter judgment in favor of Goldstein and
against Defendants providing the following relief:
19
ON ALL COUNTS
20
($126,000.00), or whatever amount deemed reasonable by this court, exclusive of costs and
23
24
(b) Punitive damages against Defendants in whatever amount, exclusive of costs and interest,
25
(c) Triple the amount of damages as determined by this Court in paragraphs (a) and (b), that
the Plaintiff is entitled to under 15 U.S.C. 1117;
COMPLAINT - 8
1
2
(d) An order permanently enjoining the Defendant from further acts of manufacturing,
selling, importing, and/or distributing of counterfeit Rooster and/or PGI goods;
(e) An order requiring the Defendant permanently destroy all counterfeit Rooster and/or PGI
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
(h) Any and all other remedies provided pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117.
12
(i) Any and all other appropriate nondiscriminatory measures to overcome the above
13
described violations;
14
(j) Such other and further relief as the Court deems appropriate
15
16
17
20
21
________________________________
J. Curtis Edmondson, P.E. attorney for
Plaintiff Precision Glassworks, Inc.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COMPLAINT - 9