Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
*Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The discount rate that forces a projects NPV to equal zero
-discount rate that forces the pv of its inflows to equal its cost.(NPV=0)
-an estimate of the projects rate of return (comparable to the UTM on a bond)
IRR calculating procedure:
1. Trial and Error: try a discounted rate; see if the equation solves to zero -> if x -> try different rate
2. Calculator Solution: put cash flows and CPT IRR
IRR is an estimate of the projects rate of return (= YTM)
If return exceeds the cost of the funds -> difference will be an additional return that goes to the
stockholders and causes the stock price
Projects should be accepted or rejected depending on whether their NPVs are positive. However, IRR
is used to rank projects and make capital budgeting decisions
-Independent projects: IRR>WACC -> accept the project / IRR<WACC -> reject
-Mutually exclusive projects: accept the project with the highest IRR provided thst IRR is greater than
WACC.
-NPV and IRR can produce conflicting conclusions when a choice is being made b/t mutually exclusive
projects -> select based on NPV
If firm generated cash flows from past projects -> it will save cost of capital
-IRR assumption (cash flow can be reinvested at the IRR) is flawed but assumption into the NPV is
generally correct.
- true investment rate < IRR -> true rate of return on the investment must be less than the calculated
IRR.
Project S-1000
500
400
300
100
-Project L
-1000
100
300
400
675
CF.S-CF.L
400
100
-100
-575
IRR =
11.975%
Crossover rate
-Project L has the higher NPV if the cost of the capital is less than the crossover rate, but S has the
higher NPV if the cost of capital is greater than that rate (Figure 11.6 pg. 386)
- Project L has the steeper the steeper slope, indicating that a given increase in the cost of capital
causes a larger decline in NPV.L than in NPV.S. (Remember Ls cash flows come in later than those
of S)
-L is LT project (cash inflow bigger) <-> S is ST project (smaller)
-If a project has most of its cash flows coming in the later years, its NPV will decline sharply of the cost
of capital increases. (but project whose cash flows come earlier will not be severely penalized by high
capital costs)
-Independent Projects: NPV and IRR criteria always lead to the same accept/reject decision
(Figure 11.5 -> accept when cost of capital is less than the IRR and NPV is positive) if the IRR says
accept, so will the NPV
-Mutually Exclusive Projects: As long as the cost of capital is greater than the crossover rate, both
method agree that project S is better: NPV.S > NPV.L & IRR.S > IRR.L (NO CONFLICT)
-if the cost of capital is less than the crossover rate, a conflict arises: NPV ranks L higher but IRR
ranks S higher (CONFLICT)
-Basic conditions that cause NPV profiles to cross and thus lead to conflicts
1) Timing differences: come in early vs come in later -> profiles may cross and result in a conflict
2) Project size difference
-> the rate of return at which differential cash flows can be reinvested is a critical issue ->USE NPV
Quick Question
0
Project A -1000
Project B-1000
1
1150
100
2
100
1300