Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Definitions of Culture
• Complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, arts,
morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits
acquired by man as a member of society. ~ E.B. Taylor,
1871
• The totality of mental and physical reactions and activites
that charaterize the behaviour of the individuals
composing a social group. ~ Franz Boas, 1938
• The sum total of knowledge, attitudes, and habitual
behaviour patterns shared and transmitted by the
members of a particular society. ~ Ralph Linton, 1940
• Shared, socially learned knowledge and patterns of
behaviour. ~ James Peoples & Garrick Bailey, 2009
←
← TWO TYPES OF CULTURE
• High culture – the arts (e.g. opera, painting)
• Way of life of a group of people – the anthropological
focus
←
← CULTURE is
• Learned (something/anything not innate); exosomatic
(outside the body)
• Shared; collective (public); group phenomenon; grows
naturally overtime
o Because it’s collective, the people can understand
each other
o Common identity; distinct traditions
←
← CULTURE and SOCIETY are NOT the same – they’re bound
together.
• Socio-cultural
• SOCIETY – the group of actual people living and
interacting with each other; unit of adaptation
• CULTURE – way of life: rules, values, classification of
reality/classes; mode of adaptation
←
← COMPONENTS OF CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE
1. NORMS – a shared ideal or rule about how people
should act on certain situations
o Rules of behaviour (e.g. Custom of avoidance b/w
mother-in-law and son-in-law)
o Judgment on this standard
S. Africa – don’t talk while eating vs. N. America
– polite conversations during supper
Apache – rude to ask “How are you?”
(implications are you find something wrong with
him) vs. White Man – regularly asks “How are
you?”
2. VALUES – what is desirable for members of a society
o Goals; way of life (e.g. Winnipeg = bargainers; saving
money VS. Swat Valley/Pashtun (Taliban) – keeping
honor by willingness to kill somebody else to
maintain it; Structure of Violence)
o Prime motivations of behaviour
Deeply engraved; sometimes resulting to
unconscious execution
3. SYMBOLS – immediately understood by the people in
that society
o Weber; Spider Web of Symbols; looking for
something that stands for something else
o Meanings are arbitrary; meanings are conventional
o Layers of symbolic communication
o “All human behaviour originates in the use of
symbols.” –Leslie White
o Geertz – “layers are thick” (for symbols)
4. CLASSIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTIONS OF REALITY –
categorical grid; reality is divided by categories;
different divisions
o Anything that cannot be categorized is deemed
either holy/sacred or cursed.
5. WORLDVIEWS
o Abstractions; sum of everything a society know about
themselves and the world around them
o E.g. Cheyenne VS Hutterite
Cheyenne: anthropocentric; human beings at
the centre
Hutterites: heliocentric/theocentric
← --------------------------------------
← September 16, 2009
←
← MODES OF ADAPTATION
1. Foraging
2. Cultivation
a. Horticulture
b. Agriculture
3. Pastoralism
←
← Adaptation: organisms develop characteristics to
adapt/survive in present conditions; in humans, they adapted to
the ecosystem available to them at that time
a. Abiotic Dimension – temperature, precipitation,
altitude, etc.
b. Biotic Dimension – abundance of resources
(plants, animals, crops); disease-related organisms
in the area
c. Human Dimension – the human factor: other
inhabitants; competition between groups
(sometimes these led to extinction/annihilation of
some)
FORAGING (hunting/gathering)
• Depends on natural resources
• They do things to increase the number of organisms they
hunt, but they do not cultivate anything
• Longest lasting form of adaptation (90-95% of human
history)
• Most successful and least damaging to the environment
• As cultivation and pastoralism expanded, foragers were
pushed into more marginal areas
• ~1500s onwards the Europeans came
← KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF FORAGING SOCIETIES
a) Basic division of labour by age and gender
(men:hunt; women:gather)
b) Seasonal mobility; systematic scheduling
Migratory factors
Seasonal food resources
Scheduled foraging (e.g. Weir fishing technique)
c) Patterns of concentration and dispersal of
population
The bands of people disperse seasonally
Usually they disperse in the winter and the units
regroup during the summer
E.g. The !Kungs: they gather together during
dry season
d) Reciprocal Sharing
Gift-giving (main economics)
Everybody gives to everybody else
Generosity
e) the band as the fundamental socio-political unit
the bands are about *25-25 people to 100-125
(*mobile unit)
flexible leadership; leader=headman
decisions made thru consensus; egalitarian
f) flexible rights to resources
they don’t defend territories
low population density = abundant resources
when population increases, the band group
has to split (as to not compete for
resources?)
←
← HORTICULTURE
• Low energy; high return
• Still used in the modern world (S.E. Asia)
o Swidden/Slash and burn:
Tropical or temperate forest environments
Extensive land use patterns
Tools: fire; digging stick
Crops: many different cultigens grown all mixed
together
CULTIGEN: grows only the stuff you need
(medicines, tobacco); rids the plot of
insects; foragers carry a lot so they have
options in case some don’t yield return
• Miniature rainforest; needs aout 15-
50 years before the plot returns to
original condition
No single time of harvest
Long fallow periods: plots abandoned until
mature forest/soil fertility regenerated
SWIDDEN only works for low population and
large land area; genetic variety
o Dry Land Gardening
Arid or semi-arid environments
Extensive land use patterns
Tools: digging stick; the hoe
People vary the location and planting times of
different fields
Reason: some fields will produce but
others will not
← CULTURAL CONSEQUENCES OF HORTICULTURE
1. The size and permanence of settlements increases
2. Increased population density
3. Rights of access to land are more defined
4. Basic socio-political unit is the independent village = 150-
200 people
← --------------------------------------
← September 18, 2009
←
← KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE
1. Both fields and human settlements become permanent
2. Fallow periods ether do not exist or are fairly short
3. An emphasis on monoculture develops, resulting to a
reliance on the growing of a single, staple crop (e.g. wheat,
rice, corn)
-----------------------------------------------
September 23, 2009
~~~~
Linda Stone's Kinship and Gender Chapter 1
Hobbes ~ 1651
• people consciously chose a king and became civil
← Ferguson
• societies grow naturally like trees
←
← Cognatic are also ancestor focused.
← -------------------------------------
← October 7, 2009
←
← Read the online article listed on the syllabus
← Read Stone’s chapter 2
Bilateral = two sided kinship; trade from both mother and father;
everyone’s related to mother and mother’s kin or father and
father’s kin; in macro view everyone’s related; no boundaries
drawn between collection of relatives; quasi group called kindred
(all the people a specific person recognizes being bilaterally
related to him/her); ego-focused; not a discreet group; kin don’t
live together but they aid each other
• E.g. Iban – Bilek
• found among foragers, hunter-gatherer, and modern
industrial societies
o Why? Emphasises the importance of nuclear families
and potential mobility
Cognatic = ancestor focused; people can end up with relatively
discreet groups (Cognatic descent groups); descent groups can
form if person is able to trace descent back to common ancestor
(male and/or female) (E.g. Zigod’s story) [theoretical and actual
memberships]
--------------------------------
← October 9, 2009
←
← Forms of Marriage (cont. from last class on Kinship)
← Fictive Kinship
• “Social” kinship
• above and beyond regular consanguine kin
• used in local societies
• Janet Hiersturn? ~ article, 1995
o kinship emerges over time; people aren’t just born
into a kinship; the kinship is made and remade
o David Schneider, 1984
primordial base of kinship (birth, procreation)
o Langkai? Kinship is a process
KINSHIP = BLOOD
FOOD = BLOOD
blood is mutual and fluid, so is kinship.
So eating together/sharing food = kinship
eating at home is important and people
just don't eat at other people’s
“You are what you eat.”
Societies of the House (house based
societies)
• basic socio-economic unit is the
house
• house and women ~
o dapur (centre of the house) ~
considered as the woman’s spot
o every house has a female spirit
and senior
o a widow can live alone, but not a
widower
o a house isn’t built til one child is
born
o strong emphasis on bro/sis
relationship
expected to render help to
each other for the rest of
their life
indivisible; idea that they
cook the same food and
have lived together; they
lived inside the same womb
and gets the same blood
from their mother (nursing)
when children are fostered,
they come to resemble
those who foster them in
appearance and character
because they EAT together
o KINSHIP IS MADE.
When people move out of a house and hasn’t
been there for a long time and don’t eat
together anymore, they are not relatives
anymore overtime. O-o
←
← ~Evolution of Kinship~
• How much of what we see in our kinship system is unique
in our species?
←
← Infant Development (of chimpanzees) ~ Movie
• Chimpanzee females marry exogamous
• matri-focal family (Flo is the mother with children)
o fathers are not around
o there are brotherly ties but fathers are non-existent
their society doesn’t have specific roles for
social fathers
• Grooming ~ all primates do this…. -_-
o especially ears for Flo
Fifi does the same thing when she has her own
kid (social learning)
line of transmission
• strong kin recognition = similar to humans
• study of primates
o to gain perspective of human evolution
o 200 primate species
ground dwellers: Savannah baboons;
chimpanzees
proto-humans had lives like the baboons
who lived in the savannah areas
chimpanzees: most closely related
relatives (DNA-wise); humans and
chimpanzees have common ancestors 5-
7million years ago; the chimp-line had
another split = the bonobos; early proto-
human life
political debate about human evolution. Was it the
female’s responsibility or the male’s?
metaphysical nonsense ~ A.J. Ayer
logical posivitists
• Posivitists ~ language
1. tautologies
saying the same thing two
different ways
2. Empirical statements
statements about reality
guide to anticipation
of reality
3. Metaphysical nonsense
proto-human history cannot be verified or
falsified.
← ~~~~
← October 14, 2009
←
Stone: Chapter 2
Primates
• pentadactyly – opposable thumb and toe; grasping of
hands and feet; hand-eye-coordination; visual predators;
intelligence; sight
o retention of ancient
o adaptation to aboreal (trees) life
o early order of mammals; adaptive radiation after the
extinction of reptiles = primates were a part of this
Eocene (54-37 million years ago)
~~~ Prosimians (lemurs; Madagascar; nails not
claws; tarsier; nocturnals)
most primitive of the primates
evolved into New World and Old World
monkeys
• dental patterns retained
• brain size
• New World monkeys have tails that
they can use to grasp things
o teeth: T:2; C:1; P:3; M:3
• Old World monkeys (e.g. Baboon)
o teeth: T:2; C:1; P:2; M:3
o Homonoids – apes (lesser apes;
greater apes)
survivors: orangutan;
gorilla; chimpanzees
Orang (malay) = man;
utan = in the forest
prolongation of infant in the womb and the
infancy and the amount of time to be taken
care of; continual expansion of the brain =
more intelligence
~~~ Anthropoids
Simians
←
← FOR MIDTERM: STONE, CH.2
← ~~~~
←
October 16, 2009
(Table 9.1)
PRIMATES (continued)
DNA difference: humans vs.
• Chimpanzee: 0.3%
• Humans vs Gorillas 0.6%
• Orangutan 2.8%
• Old World Monkeys 3.9%
• New World Monkeys 7.9%
←
← Primate Bondings/Quiasi-marriage:
← Pair Bonding/Monogamous relationship = mostly with
Gibbons
← Polygyny = usually in baboons; pretty stable bond
← Polyandry = 2-4 males meet with the female and cooperate
taking care of the young; usually in Tamara?
←
← Dominance Hierarchies
• associated with “Display” = aggressive show (includes:
vocalizations, bodily movement – leaping, bipedal stance,
rhythmic percussive way
o to show dominance, no real fights
o could be recognized as proto-human politics
o De Wall, Chimpanzee Politics
← Usually primates have oligarchy
← Group solidarity
← Kin recognition
• 36-47, Stone
• They can recognize their kin, particularly greater apes.
There’s a difference in how kin treat each other apart from
non-kin.
• MALES can bond together cooperatively and support each
other in dominance conflict. They also support younger
apes who are kin.
• p.39: Takayoshi Kano
o study of Bonobos (sister: kamiko died)
• chimps contract almost the same diseases as humans do
• strong emotional connection between chimps
• Sudanese monkeys know their kin and who’s related to
who
• Social deception in the Great Apes
o lying to get what you wants
• chimps are very intelligent
o capable of rudimentary language but cannot talk
because of their body -- they don’t have vocal tracts
like humans
o as intelligent as a 3 or 4 y.o. humans
• POST-MARITAL residence
o INHERITED RANK
patrilocal ; lives with the groom’s patrilineal
matrilines: sons of high-ranking mothers will
highly become high-ranking males in their
group
dominant female will support juvenile male
←
←
←
← ****
← October 19, 2009
← MIDTERM1 – OCTOBER 26
←
← PRIMATES – Chapter 2 (continued)
←
Sociobiology
• E.O. Wilson, 1975
• Richard Dawkins
• Genetic control; goal is evolutionary success – Darwinian
fitness
o surviving long enough to get your genes to the next
generation to as many as possible
o a lot of human behavior is geared towards natural
selection that leads to evolutionary success
programmed/wired into humans – genetic
unconsciously aiming for this evolutionary
success
← Altruistic behavior – doing something for somebody else
without expecting a benefit or reward for one’s self (Example:
prairie dogs)
• IS THIS REALLY AN ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR OR A STARTLED
REACTION?
o Inclusive fitness:
an individual can promote the transmission of
his genes to the next generation not only
through own offspring but also through other
individuals with the same genes, such as
sisters, brothers. Some of your genes will be in
your own kin and they can reproduce for you.
not limited to the individual but also applicable
to immediate kin.
KIN SELECTION
proposing biological basis for Darwinian
Fitness
←
← Human males and females have different reproductive
strategies
• MALES = naturally polygamous/promiscuous; to make
sure that genes are reproduced in the next generation;
Mate Quantity
• FEMALES = naturally monogamous; to make sure that
genes are reproduced they try to raise minimal children
who will surely live; looks for males who can protect and
provide; toned-down sexual appetite (Stone, p34?); Mate
Quality
o Nimya, Nepal = polyandrous marriage
• **Product of evolution
• Meredith Small - argued that females can also be sexually
aggressive; feminist critique of Sociobiologists; both sex
can be promiscuous
←
← DOMINANCE AND AGGRESSION IN PRIMATES
• both for patrilineal and matrilineal groups
• Males & females are equally aggressive; the male displays
aggression first before attacking, while females just
attack.
• sexual dimorphism – factor to aggression
• Male Dominance
o males have feeding priority
o spatial priority
o decide and initiate travel
**Male and female does his or her own food quest.**
o 1993, females still maintain autonomy
← Groups of Chimpanzees
1. Bachelor Bands
2. Adult (Male & female) with adolescent young (core of
the group)
3. Adult Females with Infant or small children on their own
– these females band together and protect their own
← Human and Primates
• reconstruct evolutionary path taken by humans
• HUMANS: bipedalism (factors that explain)
1. Hunting Hypothesis (Stone p.52)
earliest hominids came down from the trees and
adapted to open country and adapted to
hunting large prey; to effectively carry tools,
bipedalism was needed and to produce tools we
needed a bigger brain
males leading evolution; male-centric
2. Gathering Hypothesis (Tanner, Slocum)
Women’s activity of gathering plants
Women bipedal so carrying infant and plant
food will be easier as well as the tools they
made
female-centric
54-56, Stone
hunting-gathering transition
Fox; Synthesis
• development of division of labor by
sex
• food trade: male = meat; female =
vegetables
• male & females need each other not
only for sex but also for food
o start of marriage systems?
• Hrdy (p.57) = female primates are
sexually driven so that males will
presume that they father the child
and they will provide for the child
Key Difference Between Primates and Humans
• FOOD
o Chimps provision themselves individually on their
own
o humans share food and division of labour
• ESTRUS/ESTROUS = “Heat”
o changes in the genitals associated with ovulation
o the only time primates mate
o Humans lost this “Heat” and year-round mating
o Lovejoy:
pair-bonding; males getting responsible for
taking care of the young
pairbonding = kissing; that’s why humans
have lips.`-` loss of estrus
~~~~~
October 21, 2009
Relationships based on:
• 1. Descent (consanguineal)
o between siblings
• 2. Marriage (alliance)
o some primates have rudimentary marriage-like
relationships called alliances
←
← Fox – noted that in primates, there’s only one of the two
relationships. What’s unique to humans is the combination of
relationships based on BOTH descent AND alliance. (p.45, Stone)
←
← Primates and Humans Difference
• Relationships based on:
o 1. Descent (consanguineal)
between siblings
o 2. Marriage (alliance)
some primates have rudimentary marriage-like
relationships called alliances
←
• Humans are distinctive from primates because they
maintain life-long ties/contact with consanguineal
kin/relatives.
• Incest Taboo – universal among humans
o primates practice incest avoidance, but ONLY
humans have formal incest TABOO.
o humans: rule of exogamy for dispersal of one’s sex
o post-marriage residence contributes to the lineal
descent means of tracing (patrilineal = son living
with parents; matrilineal = females staying near
home)
←
← Why do all human systems/societies have incest taboo?
• Incest taboo: ban on marrying primary kin
o bulk of the world’s population has this system
o primary kin: mother-son; father-daughter; brother-
sister = uniquely human
Levi-Strauss – French Anthropologist
Incest taboo is the fundamental human act: key
to being human. Humans lift themselves out of
nature into having human culture.
Culture/Nature dichotomy = basic in human
culture
transforming things from nature to culture
• e.g. cooking: transforming raw
(nature) to cooked (culture)
“Others” practice incest. “We” as humans don’t
have incest.
Fox: incest vs exogamy
incest: sex practice
exogamy: rules of marriage
these 2 can go together but they don’t need to.
You can have sex with people you can’t marry.
Even though incest is allowed, it doesn’t mean
that siblings can’t marry out.
Practically speaking, incest and exogamy,
although not linked directly, are associated with
each other.
Demographic Considerations
lifespan considerations (e.g. mother-son)
dispersal of offsprings (e.g. son driven out by
adult fathers, thus cutting out incest
relationship)
• THEORIES: Incest Taboo
o The Interbreeding (Genetic) Theory
to prevent birth defects and deleterious
consequences on the offspring; recessive genes
surfacing, but this is only applicable to people
with deleterious gene PRESENT already in the
individual (e.g. Cleopatra)
PROBLEM: early humans didn’t understand
genetics; non-association of sexual relationship
with birth defects in early humans
o The Childhood Association Theory
Edward Westermarck: The History of Human
Marriage, 1981
Natural human avoidance to incest; people
raised together/closely develop sexual
avoidance towards each other
Arthur Wolfe: N. Taiwan – adopt a daughter,
marry a sister. The rich parents adopt an infant
girl and raise her together with their son, so
that when they reach maturity they will be
married off to each other. MINOR MARRIAGE
setting. Low fertility and lot of divorce on these
types of marriages.
Communal marriages: Israel; children have no
attraction towards each other
People reared in close proximity from childhood
do not develop sexual feelings for each other
and therefore adverse to incest.
o The Incest Taboo and Repression
Freud: Totem and Taboo, 1918
The incest taboo exist to stifle conscious or
unconscious desire to have sex with kin; people
are guilted out of this desire.
Horde example; memory of primal cannibalism
strong erotic impulses towards a parent
(Oedipus Complex; Electra Complex)
the horror of incest is an unconscious want to
do incest -_-; mechanism of repression?
Father-daughter incest; brother-sister; mother-
son; ranking of incest from most common to
least
incest are usually child abuse
People have repressed desires for incestuous
relationships which are very strong and hence
they insitute stern penalties for incest to keep
them repressed.
o The Functionalist Theory
Malinowski: Sex and Repression in Savage
Society, 1924
focus on family and rules in the family
aka Psychological Theory
before you develop sexuality, affection for
family members thus cementing family bond
sex within the family will disrupt the family
structure
violent emotions that can be caused by sexual
rivalry and will burst the family unit
incest taboo is to keep the family unit intact
family has role structure = structure is rule
might be a very Romantic approach
e.g. Fulani incident
o The Alliance Theory
Levi-Strauss: Elementary Structures of Kinship
1949
started from Tyler, 1900s
choice made by humans is either dying in
or marrying out
binding families together; affinal kinship and
consanguineal alliances = better chance for
survival
families who practice incest become isolated
and culturally stagnant and eventually die out
Levi-Strauss (S. America) – people marrying
outside to get Brothers-in-law to go hunting with
Neanderthals – overtime declined
homo sapiens have trade/exchange
connections outside of their boundaries
Neanderthals stayed within themselves;
supports the Alliance Theory
~~~~~~
October 23, 2009
← Freud and Westermarck cannot be both true should they be
considered universals. Each may be partially true.
←
← Incest is a form of Child Abuse. It damages people. None of
the theories support this.
←
← Exceptions to Incest Taboo (Cultural)
• insisted in various societies in different areas
o e.g. Royal families of Egypt, Incas, Hawaii
royal marital marriages are prescribe.
Royalty is viewed divine and should only be
married to another divinity – marriage to a
mortal can be polluting.
they may not have wanted power, wealth, and
status shared with another group.
Cleopatra – married 12 year old brother and
murdered him
o Azande
Father-daughter marriages in the royal family
agriculture society in Africa
to keep outsiders and others out
ONLY kings and not ordinary people can do this
*exceptions to Incest Taboo is usually routed in social
(political); not biological instinct
o Lakher (S. Asia)
Father owns children
Divorced woman’s half-offsprings can marry
each
divorced man’s half offsprings cannot marry
← Extension of the Incest Taboo
• Anyone you call mother or father or any other form of
kinship you cannot marry them
• must look into exogamous marriages/sexual relationships
• through lineage and clan
← Penalties for Incest
• Can be severe, mild, or non-existent
• Australia: most tribes punish incest with death
• Bali: humiliation, banishment
• N.America (Plains Tribe): incest is inconceivable and only
insane people will indulge on incest; punishments are mild
• Quite often SEVERE
• supernatural sanction; spirits will be offended along with
the rest of the group
• Oedipus Rex story – example of incest in Western culture
and supernatural sanction
• handsome young tien:
o Gar/DeGar (mountain tribes)
o blood anointment
o Aang (widow)
o Tieng (widower)
o beng – taboo; fornication b/w siblings
o the guilty has to pay a fine (goes to rich people) and
they would have to eat shit (just lick) to appease the
spirits and to stop the rain
o coincidence (rain) interpreted as divine displeasure
o Tieng commits suicide because he didn’t want to
move outside the village.
Suicide also has taboo.
← Incest:
• Supernatural aspect that threatens the whole group.
• social disapproval
23/10/2009 09:58:00
←
23/10/2009 09:58:00
←