Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Cryogenics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cryogenics
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 September 2013
Received in revised form 24 November 2013
Accepted 9 January 2014
Available online 20 January 2014
Keywords:
Heat exchanger
Axial conduction
Flow maldistribution
Microchannel
Cryogenic
a b s t r a c t
When a compact microchannel heat exchanger is operated at cryogenic environments, it has potential
problems of axial conduction and ow maldistribution. To analyze these detrimental effects, the heat
exchanger model that includes both axial conduction and ow maldistribution effect is developed in consideration of the microchannel heat exchanger geometry. A dimensionless axial conduction parameter (k)
is used to describe the axial conduction effect, and the coefcient of variation (CoV) is introduced to
quantify the ow maldistribution condition. The effectiveness of heat exchanger is calculated according
to the various values of the axial conduction parameter and the CoV. The analysis results show that the
heat exchanger effectiveness is insensitive when k is less than 0.005, and effectiveness is degraded with
the large value of CoV. Three microchannel heat exchangers are fabricated with printed circuit heat
exchanger (PCHE) technology for validation purpose of the heat exchanger model. The rst heat exchanger is a conventional heat exchanger, the second heat exchanger has the modied cross section to eliminate axial conduction effect, and the third heat exchanger has the modied cross section and the cross
link in parallel channel to mitigate ow maldistribution effect. These heat exchangers are tested in cryogenic single-phase, and two-phase environments. The third heat exchanger shows the ideal thermal characteristic, while the other two heat exchangers experience some performance degradation due to axial
conduction or ow maldistribution. The impact of axial conduction and ow maldistribution effects
are veried by the simulation results and compared with the experimental results.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Demand of high performance compact heat exchangers is
increasing for volume-limited cryogenic processes. The most representative example of the volume limited cryogenic process is
the natural gas liquefaction process for Liqueed Natural GasFloating Production Storage and Ofoading (LNG-FPSO).
The compact cryogenic liquefaction process inevitably requires
small components due to space limitation of a ship, as well as high
performance heat exchanger (e > 0.90 NTU > 10) for efcient operation. Microchannel heat exchangers satisfy these requirements.
First, the heat transfer area is increased due to small hydraulic
diameter of the channel, therefore, the area density is large within
same volume. Since the heat transfer coefcient is larger than that
Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 42 350 3079; fax: +82 42 350 8207.
E-mail addresses: s.baek@kaist.ac.kr (S. Baek), cheonkyu_lee@kaist.ac.kr (C. Lee),
skjeong@kaist.ac.kr (S. Jeong).
1
Tel.: +82 42 350 3079; fax: +82 42 350 8207.
2
Tel.: +82 42 350 3039; fax: +82 42 350 8207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.01.003
0011-2275/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
50
Nomenclature
A
B
C
cp
Dh
G
h
k
L
_
m
N
NTU
Nu
P
q
Re
S
t
T
th
U
area, m2
bias error
heat capacity rate, W/K
heat capacity, J/kg K
hydraulic diameter, m
mass ux, kg/m2 s
heat transfer coefcient, W/m2 K
thermal conductivity, W/m K
length of heat exchanger, m
mass ow rate, kg/s
number of channels, number of data
number of transfer units
Nusselt number
precision error
heat transfer rate, W
Reynolds number
standard deviation of data
T-distribution for a condence level
temperature, K
thickness of separator, m
heat transfer conductance, W/m2 K
axial position, m
Greek
a
e
Subscript
c
h
ideal
in
max
min
MR
out
w
cold uid
hot uid
ideal condition
inlet
maximum
minimum
mixed refrigerant
outlet
wall or wall cross sectional area
l
r
the uid streams and the metal separator, as equations from (1)
(3).
dT h
hh Ah;HT
T h T w
dx
L
dT c
hc Ac;HT
T w T c
dx
L
d
dT w
dT
dT
_ h cp;h h m
_ c cp;c c
m
k w Aw
dx
dx
dx
dx
_ h cp;h
m
_ c cp;c
m
Since the numerical scheme of heat exchanger model is fully explained in the literature [9], the important assumptions are only
highlighted in this paper. The model inputs are as followings:
constant heat transfer coefcients (hh, hc) on both sides
thickness (thw) and constant thermal conductivity (kw) of the
wall (or separator)
mass ow rate (mh,mc) on both sides
inlet temperature (Th,in, Tc,in) on both sides
constant heat capacity (cp,h, cp,c) on both sides
The pressure drop in the microchannel is neglected in this
study. The output results from the heat exchanger model are the
temperature prole in the heat exchanger. The heat transfer coefcients and heat capacity values on both streams are assumed to
have constant values. The number of transfer unit (NTU) is dened
as the following equation.
NTU
UAHT
_ p min
mc
1
1
1
51
Fig. 1. Heat exchanger geometry used in numerical simulation of a simple counterow heat exchanger.
q
qmax
T T c;in
T h;in T c;in
x
x
L
1.00
Analytic solution
=0.0002
=0.0022
=0.0043
=0.0217
=0.1085
0.90
Numerical solution
=0.0002
=0.0022
=0.0043
=0.0217
=0.1085
0.85
0.80
5
0.8
0.6
Fig. 2 displays the comparison between e-NTU relation of Kroegers analytic solution and numerical solution with various values
of k in balanced ow condition (Ch = Cc) and constant properties.
The numerical solution accurately predicts the analytical solution
over the entire range of NTU and k. The effectiveness degradation
at the same NTU value is also observed in Fig. 2; the effectiveness
is dramatically decreased when k has higher values than 0.005.
Fig. 3 shows the temperature prole of hot/cold uids and the
metal separator in the heat exchanger when k = 0.2. The nondimensional temperature and heat exchanger is used to describe
the temperature prole in the heat exchanger as the following
equations,
0.95
Hot
Wall
Cold
0.4
kw Aw
LC min
Effectiveness ()
1.0
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
Fig. 2. Effectiveness predicted by the numerical model as a function of NTU for
different values of k compared with Kroegers analytical solution.
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
x*
Fig. 3. Temperature proles of uids and metal separator (k = 0.1, NTU = 8).
exchanger. The metal separator receives heat from the hot uid,
however, not all of the heat is transferred to the cold uid. Heat
is partially transferred through the metal plate in axial direction.
Therefore, the outlet temperature shows the degraded values,
resulting in the effectiveness loss. When a compact heat exchanger
is designed for cryogenic purpose, it is very important to have low
k by controlling the length of heat exchanger, and the cross sectional area of heat exchanger body.
2.2. Heat exchanger model with axial conduction and ow
maldistribution effect
Before the ow maldistribution effect on the heat exchanger
performance is considered, it is important to dene the specic
ow maldistribution condition in microchannel heat exchanger.
Fig. 4 displays the typical structure of counterow heat exchanger
with microchannels. The horizontally parallel channels are installed on one layer, and another set of horizontally parallel
channels are installed on the different layer. Four major ow maldistribution conditions can be assumed with the header conguration of heat exchanger, as displayed in Fig. 5. When the inlet pipe is
installed in perpendicular direction, the channel near the inlet pipe
will have higher mass ow rate (Fig. 5a and c, linear weighted condition). When the inlet pipe is installed in axial direction, the mass
ow rate at the center channels has higher values than the side
channels (Fig. 5b and d, center weighted condition).
To simulate these ow maldistribution condition, two kinds of
counterow heat exchanger models are developed; the vertical
and the horizontal heat exchanger model. These heat exchanger
models are developed based on the simple counterow heat
exchanger model (Fig. 6a). The vertical heat exchanger model
52
_ h2 cp;h2
m
dT h2
hh2 Ah;HT
T h2 T w3
dx
L
hh2 Ah;HT
hh2 Ah;HT
T h2 T w4
L
L
T h2 T w5
12
The energy balance equation for the separating walls are identical with Eq. (11) except the description of adjacent walls. As
the vertical heat exchanger model, when the number of uid pair
is given, the number of energy balance equations for uids and
walls are added and modied.
The effect of ow maldistribution can be simulated by assuming
different mass ow rate at each channel. Table 1 summarizes the
linear weight ow-mal distribution condition, and Table 2 shows
the center weighted ow maldistribution condition for the three
uid pair heat exchanger models. The mass ow rate of hot side
is distorted, and the cold side mass ow rate is kept uniform as
the preceding studies [2,3]. To dene the degree of ow maldistribution, the coefcient of variation (CoV) is introduced. The CoV is
dened as the following equation.
PN
2
standard deviation r
CoV
average l
_ c1 cp;c
m
dT c1
hc1 Ac;HT
hc1 Ac;HT
T c1 T w1
dx
L
L
T c1 T w2
m
13
PN
_
i1 mi T i;out
PN
_
i1 mi
14
10
3.1. Impact of ow maldistribution
d
dT w2
dT
dT
_ c1 cp;c1 c1 m
_ h2 cp;h2 h2
m
kw Aw
dx
dx
dx
dx
_ i m
m
The CoV can vary from 0 to very large positive values, and zero
value of CoV indicates the ideally distributed ow condition. The
inlet temperatures are assumed to be identical, and the mean outlet temperatures are dened as the following equation.
T out
consists of hot and cold channels located alternatively. The separating walls are situated between the hot and cold uid channels.
Fig. 6b displays the schematic of vertical heat exchanger model.
The governing equation for the each stream is modied from Eqs.
(1) and (2). From the cold uid 1, the uid encounters two separating walls upward and downward. The heat transfer rate from the
additional wall should be considered in the uid energy balance
as the following equation.
i1
11
53
Fig. 6. (a) the simple counter ow heat exchanger model, (b) vertical heat exchanger model: the ow channels are located up and down alternatively, and (c) horizontal heat
exchanger model: the ow channels are located in the right or left side simultaneously.
(a) 1.0
Table 1
Linear weighted ow mal-distribution conditions.
CoV
mh1 (%)
m2 (%)
mh3 (%)
0.8
Ideal
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
100.0
124.5
149.0
173.5
198.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
75.5
51.0
26.5
2.0
0.6
Hot-Ideal
Cold-Ideal
Hot-Flow mal
Cold-Flow mal
Cases
0.4
0.2
Table 2
Center weighted ow maldistribution conditions.
Cases
CoV
mh1 (%)
mh2 (%)
m3 (%)
Ideal
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Case 8
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
100
85.8
71.5
57.5
43.0
100
128.3
157.0
185.0
214.0
100
85.85
71.5
57.5
43.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
1.0
Hot 1=190%
Hot 2=100%
Hot 3=10%
Cold 1=100%
Cold 2=100%
Cold 3=100%
(b) 1.0
0.8
0.6
0.8
x*
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
x*
Fig. 7. (a) Average temperature prole of hot and cold uid in the horizontal heat
exchanger (Perfect case and ow maldistribution case). (b) Temperature prole of
three hot and three cold uids (ow maldistribution case).
54
(a) 1.00
0.95
Effectiveness ()
Effectiveness ()
(a) 1.00
0.90
Ideal
Case 2: CoV=0.2
Case 3: CoV=0.4
Case 4: CoV=0.6
Case 5: CoV=0.8
0.85
10
15
20
25
0.90
Ideal
Case 1: CoV=0.2
Case 2: CoV=0.4
Case 3: CoV=0.6
Case 4: CoV=0.8
0.85
0.80
0.80
5
0.95
30
10
15
NTU
(b) 1.00
25
30
0.95
Effectiveness ()
Effectiveness ()
(b) 1.00
20
NTU
0.90
Ideal
Case 6: CoV=0.2
Case 7: CoV=0.4
Case 8: CoV=0.6
Case 9: CoV=0.8
0.85
10
15
20
25
Ideal
Case 7: CoV=0.4
Case 8: CoV=0.6
Case 9: CoV=0.8
0.85
0.80
0.80
5
0.90
30
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
NTU
1.02
1.01
1.00
/0
0.99
C*=1
0.98
C*=0.8
C*=0.6
0.97
C*=0.4
0.96
C*=0.2
0.95
5
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
eratio
e
eideal
15
55
_ h1 1:4 g=s;m
_ h2 1:0 g=s;m
_ h3 0:6 g=s
at x 0 ! m
Linear weighted condition
180
160
140
16
_ h1 1:0 g=s;m
_ h2 1:0 g=s;m
_ h3 1:0 g=s
at x 1=4 ! m
The mass ow rate at each channels after the ow redistribution device is decided with the pressure drop of the ow redistribution device in actual condition. However, the mass ow rate at
each channels after the ow redistribution device is assumed to
be identical, because the pressure drop is neglected in this study.
21 channels: CoV=0.4
11 channels: CoV=0.4
5 channels: CoV=0.4
3 channels: CoV=0.4
120
100
80
(a) 1.0
60
0.8
NTU~8, ~50
Hot 1=160%
Hot 2=100%
Hot 3=40%
40
0.6
20
21 channels: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
11 channels: 1
5 channels: 1
2
3
4
5
3 channels: 1
2
3
0.4
Channel Number
Cold 1=100%
Cold 2=100%
Cold 3=100%
0.2
Fig. 11. The ow distribution proles at different heat exchangers with identical
CoV.
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
x*
(b) 1.00
1.00
0.95
0.90
0.85
0.80
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
Fig. 12. e-NTU relation with different heat exchangers (5 pairs, 11 pairs, and 21
pairs). The performance degradation is intensied with the increase of the number
of channels.
Effectiveness ()
Effectiveness ()
0.95
~0, CoV=0
~0, CoV=0.6
0.90
0.85
=0.37, CoV=0
=0.37, CoV=0.6
0.80
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
Fig. 13. (a) Temperature prole in the horizontal heat exchanger when ow
maldistribution and axial conduction occur simultaneously. (b) Example of e-NTU
relation with axial conduction and ow maldistribution effect, (C = 1).
(a) 1.00
Effectiveness ratio (/0)
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
0.90
5
10
20
25
0.95
0.90
0.85
10
15
20
25
Fig. 15. (a) Effectiveness ratio between ow maldistribution heat exchanger and
ow redistribution structured heat exchanger in horizontal heat exchanger model
(C 1; k 0; 3 pairs), and (b) effectiveness ratio between ow maldistribution
heat exchanger and ow redistribution structured heat exchanger in vertical heat
exchanger model (C 1; k 0; 3 pairs).
channel layers alternatively, diffusion bonding is carefully performed to make complete heat exchanger in a vacuum furnace.
These PCHEs are identically composed of 10 hot streams and 10
cold streams in a counter ow arrangement. The PCHE has core
dimensions of 220 77 8 mm3. Four 1/4 in. stainless steel tubes
are welded at each entrance of the ows as headers of the PCHE.
The heat exchanger model is capable of simulating both axial
conduction and ow maldistribution effects; accordingly, three
heat exchangers are fabricated to conrm these two effects.
1.0
Hot-1
Hot-2
Hot-3
Hot - Ideal
Cold - Ideal
0.6
0.4
Cold-1
Cold-2
Cold-3
0.2
Flow
mal-distribution Flow re-distribution device
0.0
0.0
0.2
30
NTU
0.8
30
(b) 1.00
0.80
15
NTU
56
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
x*
Fig. 14. Temperature prole with ow redistribution device in vertical heat
exchanger model with ow maldistribution condition.
57
Fig. 17. Fabricated three microchannel heat exchangers by PCHE technology (a) PCHE-1 (b) PCHE-2, and (c) PCHE-3.
58
The uncertainty of measured data is determined with the following equation [17]. Table 4 shows the instrumentation errors
for the experimental setup. The experimental results show the
uncertainty around 1.5%.
s
2
S
U B2 t95%;v p
N1
17
59
(c)
Velocity (m/s)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Horizontal
Vertical
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Channel Number
Fig. 19. Velocity streamlines at the fabricated heat exchanger header (a) upper view, (b) side view, and (c) velocity distribution at specic locations.
Table 3
Specications of fabricated heat exchanger.
Specication
PCHE-1
PCHE-2
PCHE-3
340 lm
0.2024 m2
2.64 105 m2
6.21 104 m2
0.2 m
0.020
0.15
340 lm
0.2024 m2
2.64 105 m2
1.55 104 m2
0.55 m
0.001
0.15
340 lm
0.2024 m2
2.64 105 m2
1.55 104 m2
0.55 m
0.001
0
Re
GDh
l
18
60
Compressor
Helium
Compressor
Liquid nitrogen
Supply
Return
Supply
Supply
MFC
LN2
Bath
Test
PCHE
Expansion
device
P3, T4
Cold In
P2, T2
Hot out
Vacuum
Chamber
Fig. 22. Experimental setup to measure heat exchanger effectiveness in cryogenic
two phase ow environment (mixed refrigerant Joule Thomson process).
Vacuum
Chamber
Fig. 20. Experimental setup to measure heat exchanger effectiveness in cryogenic
single phase environment.
Measurement
Number
Error
Note
Temperature
Pressure
Mass ow rate
Gas chromatography
4
4
1
1
0.1 K
0.5%
0.5%
1%
(Surface mount)
Total uncertainty
1.5%
300
Table 4
The instrument errors for the experimental setup.
280
Experimental
PCHE-3
PCHE-2
PCHE-1
PCHE-2 (experimental)
PCHE-3 (experimental)
Temperature before/after (calculation)
260
240
220
200
180
160
160
1.00
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
0.90
1.00
0.85
Numerical
~0.001, CoV=0
~0.001, CoV=0.15, Horizontal, 22 pairs, center weighted
~0.020, CoV=0.15, Horizontal, 22 pairs, center weighted
0.80
5
10
15
20
25
30
NTU
Fig. 21. Comparison of experimental effectiveness with simulation e-NTU results in
various NTU values (C = 1).
Effectiveness ()
Effectiveness ()
T3 : Cold end
T,P
Cold In
T,P
Hot out
0.95
P4, T5
Cold Out
HEX
T,P
Cold Out
T,P
Hot in
Return
Experimental
PCHE-3
PCHE-2
0.98
PCHE-1 (Expected)
0.96
0.94
0.92
C*=0.98
Numerical
~0.001, CoV=0
~0.001, CoV=0.15
(Horizontal, 22 pairs, Center weighted)
~0.020, CoV=0.15
(Horizontal, 22 pairs, Center weighted)
0.90
20
40
NTU
Fig. 24. Comparison of experimental effectiveness with simulation e-NTU results in
various NTU values (C = 0.98).
hDh
Nu
kMR
7:5411 2:61a 4:97a2 5:119a3 2:702a4 0:548a5
19
where the a is the aspect ratio of the square duct.
The average thermal conductivity of the mixed refrigerant is
calculated with REFPROP 9, and then NTU values are estimated.
The calculated NTU shows the value around 30. The heat capacity
rate ratio (C) is 0.98 in the given operating condition. The effectiveness value from the experiments is calculated by the measured
temperature and pressure conditions. Note that the experimental
results include uncertainties in both NTU and effectiveness.
It is certain in Fig. 24 that the PCHE-3 shows the higher effectiveness than that of PCHE-2 on similar NTU values. Because
PCHE-3 has ow redistribution device in the heat exchanger, ow
maldistribution effect must be mitigated. The effectiveness values
deduced from the experimental results indicate that the two-phase
ow maldistribution exists in PCHE-2, but resolved in PCHE-3,
which is also veried by numerical simulations.
5. Conclusion
The heat exchanger model that includes axial conduction and
ow maldistribution effect is developed in this paper. The dimensionless axial conduction parameter (k) and ow maldistribution
coefcient (CoV) are used to describe axial conduction effect and
the ow maldistribution condition. The heat exchanger effectiveness is specically calculated based on k and CoV. The effectiveness
is degraded with high values of k and CoV. The heat exchanger
geometry modication is one solution to have low axial conduction
effect. The thermal performance degradation due to ow maldistribution effect can be mitigated by ow redistribution device inside
the heat exchanger.
The microchannel heat exchangers are fabricated to examine
the geometry effect on axial conduction and ow maldistribution.
The modied geometry in the heat exchanger successfully diminishes axial conduction and ow maldistribution problems, which
resultantly increase effectiveness values.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Power Generation & Electricity
Delivery of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation
61
and Planning (KETEP) Grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (No. 2011101050002B).
References
[1] Pacio JC, Dorao CA. A review on heat exchanger thermal hydraulic models for
cryogenic applications. Cryogenics 2011;51(7):36679.
[2] Fleming R. The effect of ow maldistribution in parallel channels of
counterow heat exchangers. Adv Cryogenic Eng 1967:1235262.
[3] Jung J, Jeong S. Effect of ow mal-distribution on effective NTU in multichannel counter-ow heat exchanger of single body. Cryogenics
2007;47(4):23242.
[4] Jung J, Hwang G, Baek S, Jeong S, Rowe AM. Partial ow compensation by
transverse bypass conguration in multi-channel cryogenic compact heat
exchanger. Cryogenics 2012;52(1):1926.
[5] Prabhakara Rao B, Krishna Kumar P, Das SK. Effect of ow distribution to the
channels on the thermal performance of a plate heat exchanger. Chem Eng
Process: Process Intensicat 2002;41(1):4958.
[6] Pacio JC, Dorao CA. A study of the effect of ow maldistribution on heat
transfer performance in evaporators. Nucl Eng Des 2010;240(11):386877.
[7] Kroeger P. Performance deterioration in high effectiveness heat exchangers
due to axial heat conduction effects. Adv Cryogenic Eng 1967:1236372.
[8] Nellis GF. A heat exchanger model that includes axial conduction, parasitic
heat loads, and property variations. Cryogenics 2003;43(9):52338.
[9] Nellis G, Klein S. Heat transfer. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
[10] Baek S, Kim J-H, Jeong S, Jung J. Development of highly effective cryogenic
printed circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) with low axial conduction. Cryogenics
2012;52(79):36674.
[11] Baek S, Kim J, Hwang G, Jeong S. Elongating axial conduction path design to
enhance performance of cryogeinc compact PCHE (Printed Circuit Heat
Exchanger). AIP Conf Proc 2012;1434(1):6318.
[12] Dang MN. A study on two-phase ow characteristics in cross-linked
microchannel heat sinks. Concordia University; 2007.
[13] Megahed A. Experimental investigation of ow boiling characteristics in a
cross-linked microchannel heat sink. Int J Multiph Flow 2011;37(4):38093.
[14] ANSYS. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide; 2012.
[15] Lemmon EW, Huber ML, McLinden MO. NIST Standard Reference Database 23:
reference uid thermodynamic and transport properties-REFPROP. Version 9.0
ed: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data
Program, Gaithersburg; 2010.
[16] Peng XF, Peterson GP. Convective heat transfer and ow friction for water ow
in microchannel structures. Int J Heat Mass Transf 1996;39(12):2599608.
[17] Moffat RJ. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Thermal
Fluid Sci 1988;1(1):317.
[18] Barron RF. Cryogenic systems. Oxford University Press; 1985.
[19] Nellis G, Hughes C, Pfotenhauer J. Heat transfer coefcient measurements for
mixed gas working uids at cryogenic temperatures. Cryogenics
2005;45(8):54656.
[20] Riehl RR, Seleghim Jr P, Ochterbeck JM. Comparison of heat transfer
correlations for single- and two-phase microchannel ows for
microelectronics cooling. In: Thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in
electronic systems, 1998 ITHERM 98 The Sixth Intersociety Conference on
1998; p. 40916.
[21] Su Q, Yu GX, Wang HS, Rose JW. Microchannel condensation: correlations and
theory. Int J Refrig 2009;32(6):114952.
[22] Hesselgreaves JE. Compact heat exchangers: selection, design, and operation:
Pergamon Pr; 2001.