ATTACHMENT 1-A

SUMMARY REPORT
UTILIZATION OF FY 2013 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES EDUCATION
PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND (IPEd PSF)
As of December 31, 2014
REGIONAL/DIVISION OFFICE: __________________________________
* If Division Office, indicate region before division name (e.g., X Bukidnon)
A. PSF Allocation (in PhP)
B. Amount utilized (in PhP)
(as of Dec. 31, 2014)
C. Utilization Rate (%)
(C = B/A*100)

SUMMARY PER THEMATIC FOCUS AREA

2013 THEMATIC

NUMBER

BUDGET

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

FOCUS AREA

OF

(PhP)

NUMBER OF

AMOUNT

ACTIVITIES

SPENT/UTILIZED

CONDUCTED

(PhP)

PLANNED
ACTIVITIES

Based on
Work and

Based on
Work and
Financial
Plan
A. Establishment of
baseline and
situation
analysis
B. Capacity
building
C. Advocacy and
partnershipbuilding
* Not within the
thematic focus area, if
there are any

Financial Plan

*total amount

TOTAL

here should
match the
total amount
in the Work
and Financial
Plan based on
the office PSF
allocation

ATTACHMENT 1-B
SUMMARY REPORT
UTILIZATION OF FY 2014 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES EDUCATION
PROGRAM SUPPORT FUND (IPEd PSF)
As of May 31, 2015
Region IX , Zamboanga del Norte

A. PSF Allocation (in PhP)

P1,361,000.00
B. Amount utilized (in PhP)
(as of May 31,2015 )
C. Utilization Rate (%)

960,246

71%

(C = B/A*100)

SUMMARY PER THEMATIC FOCUS AREA

2014 THEMATIC

NUMBER

BUDGET

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

FOCUS AREA

OF

(PhP)

NUMBER OF

AMOUNT

ACTIVITIES

SPENT/UTILIZED

CONDUCTED

(PhP)

794,246

PLANNED
ACTIVITIES

Based on
Work and

Based on

Financial Plan

Work and
Financial
A. Capacity

Plan
5

P 794,246.00

building
B. Community
engagement and
partnership-

P 118,000.00

118,000

P 448,754.00

48,000

P1,361,000.00

960,246

building
C. Education
planning for
IPEd
* Not within the
thematic focus area, if
there are any
TOTAL

Prepared by:
EVELYN C. LABAD
IPED FOCAL

ATTACHMENT 2
GUIDE TO PREPARING THE STATUS REPORT ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES EDUCATION (IPED) FRAMEWORK
DEVELOPMENT
NOTE (please read carefully): For the National Conference, Divisions are requested to prepare a brief update on the status of their
IPEd Framework development.
Please start with PART A (Preparatory Phase) and update the report provided during the 3 rd Inter-Regional Conference. If your
activities have proceeded to the succeeding portions of framework development, please proceed to PART B. Otherwise, you are only
to submit PART A.
If PART A has been reported as completed during the 3 rd Inter-Regional Conference, indicate that PART A has been completed and
please proceed to PART B.
PART A.
The matrix below (discussed during the Training-Workshop on Community Engagement) is provided to guide the preparation of the
Division Report. PART A is to be presented in four (4) slides (in MS Powerpoint), with each slide containing the specified content in
the fourth column of the matrix (highlighted in gray).
PHASES

POINTS TO BE COVERED

AGREEMENTS REACHED

WHAT TO REPORT ON

A. Preparatory Phase
1. Consolidation of
DepED
Perspective
(DepED only)

K to 12, DepED Order No. 62, s. 2011

(National IPEd Policy Framework) or DO62,
Indigenous Peoples (IPs), culture and
education

K to 12 and culture-based
dimension
DO62 and the Rightsbased Approach (RBA)
Historical understanding

(SLIDE 1)

Activities done/planned

PHASES

POINTS TO BE COVERED

AGREEMENTS REACHED

2. Familiarity of
DepED with IP
matters

a.
b.
c.
d.

e.
f.

3. Determination
of IP
representation
for IPEd
framework
formulation

The IP groups in the

Division/Region
Basic demographic data
Customary governance
Which Indigenous Cultural
Communities (ICCs) are reached by
DepED services
Previous efforts of DepED with
IPs
Customs/norms we need to
know for initial meeting

Appropriate persons to invite

of IPs in the Philippine

context
Culture as a way of life
Indigenous Knowledge
Systems and Practices
(IKSPs) and Indigenous
Learning Systems (ILS)
(not just dances, songs,
artifacts, etc.)

Not Applicable

WHAT TO REPORT ON
to prepare DepED side
for engaging IP
communities

(SLIDE 2)

Data at hand
Data still needed

Not applicable

(SLIDE 3)

Listing of Indigenous
Peoples Organizations
(IPOs)/IPs contacted

PHASES

POINTS TO BE COVERED

AGREEMENTS REACHED

WHAT TO REPORT ON
and which ICC they are
related to

Sharing of any issues

encountered related to
representation
4. Consultativeorientation
discussions
with the IP
representatives
(DepED and IPs)

a. Who are IPs, ancestral domain, culture;

Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA),
particularly sections related to education
and cultural integrity
b. K to 12, DO62
c. Explain the intent to PARTNER with the
communities
d. Explain the framework formulation
process, that this will be the basis for
joint action

Common understanding of

(SLIDE 4)

both parties on the following:

a. Who are IPs, ancestral
domain, culture; IPRA
b. K to 12, DO 62
c. Framework formulation

For those who already

have initial attempts at
framework formulation
(CAR, La Union, and
Ilocos Sur):

Initial step in
permissioning/consent-

seeking process

Are the community

representatives amenable
to continuing the
discussion for the
framework formulation
process?
Setting of schedules

Status of
Framework
formulation
process
Next steps

For those who have

conducted this step,
share highlights of the

PHASES

POINTS TO BE COVERED

AGREEMENTS REACHED

Setting of requirements
for framework
formulation
Identification of other
participants, if this is
raised

WHAT TO REPORT ON
discussions:

PART B.
PART B is to be presented in four (4) slides (in MS Powerpoint).

Date
Which IP groups
came
Who participated
from the Division
Office
Did communities
agree to continue?
Why or why not?
Did the communities
set some conditions
for the framework
formulation process?
Next steps

The succeeding Phases of Framework Development are listed below. Please check what phases have

(SLIDE 1)

been covered in this last quarter.

PHASES
Ancestral Domain Analysis (which includes formulation of the AD

Please check

VMGO)
Education Situation Analysis
VMGO formulation for Culture-responsive Education
Strategic policies formulation
Formulation of PPAs for IP Education

REGARDING COMMUNITY REPRESENTATION

(SLIDE 2)

1. What were the considerations in looking for community representatives?

2. What issues have been encountered or what concerns have been raised regarding
representation?
3. Please identify position/designation of community representatives who have been
participating in the framework development sessions (e.g., Elder, Customary Governance
Elder, Culture Bearer, Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representative (IPMR), Indigenous
Peoples Organization (IPO) Officer, etc.)
REGARDING THE FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT OUTLINE/GUIDE
1. Please describe briefly the modifications done, if there were any, on the outline/guide
(additions, deletions, rearrangements, etc.) for framework development and why these changes
were done.
2. What difficulties/challenges were encountered during the framework development? How were
these resolved?

(SLIDE 3)

REGARDING THE FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

1. Please describe key concerns raised, if there were any, by the community regarding framework
development.
2. At what level is framework development being done, at the Division or school level?
3. What are the technical assistance needs in framework development for the coming months?

(SLIDE 4)